[Expert consensus on BRAF inhibitors in the treatment of malignant solid tumors (2024 edition)].

The global aging population is leading to an increasing incidence of cancer, exacerbating the global burden of cancer. By 2040, the total number of cancer patients worldwide is projected to reach 28 million. With advancements in tumor molecular biology research and the widespread application of next-generation sequencing technology, precision treatment for cancer has made significant progress in clinical settings. Selective targeting of the Braf gene has emerged as one of the early successful cases of precision medicine for tumors. Braf gene mutations can result in unrestricted activation of downstream kinases in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cell signaling pathway, promoting rapid proliferation of tumor cells. BRAF inhibitors, either as monotherapy or in combination with MEK inhibitor, have been approved for various cancers, including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer and glioma, among others. Clinical studies related to BRAF inhibitors are continuously exploring new applications. However, there is currently no consensus on the use of BRAF inhibitors in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple solid cancers in China. This article integrates clinical evidence of Braf mutations in multiple solid cancers to establish an expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of malignant solid cancers with Braf gene mutations. The goal is to promote and guide the standardized application of BRAF inhibitors.

New S-substituted-3-phenyltetrahydrobenzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one scaffold with promising anticancer activity profile through the regulation and inhibition of mutated B-RAF signaling pathway.

Novel 3-phenyltetrahydrobenzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives were synthesized and screened for their antiproliferative activity against a panel of 60 cancer cell lines. Derivatives 5b, 5f, and 9c showed significant antitumor activity at a single dose with mean growth inhibition of 55.62%, 55.79%, and 71.40%, respectively. These compounds were further investigated against HCT-116, colon cancer cell line, and FHC, normal colon cell line. Compound 9c showed the highest activity with IC50 = 0.904 ± 0.03 µM and SI = 20.42 excelling doxorubicin which scored IC50 = 2.556 ± 0.09 µM and SI = 6.19. Compound 9c was also the most potent against B-RAFWT and mutated B-RAFV600E with IC50 = 0.145 ± 0.005 and 0.042 ± 0.002 µM, respectively in comparison with vemurafenib with IC50 = 0.229 ± 0.008 and 0.038 ± 0.001 µM, respectively. The cell cycle analysis showed that 9c increased the cell population and induced an arrest in the cell cycle of HCT-116 cancer cells at the G0-G1 stage with 1.23-fold. Apoptosis evaluation showed that compound 9c displayed an 18.18-fold elevation in total apoptosis of HCT-116 cancer cells in comparison to the control. Compound 9c increased the content of caspase-3 by 3.52-fold versus the control. A molecular modeling study determined the binding profile and interaction of 9c with the B-RAF active site.

Ursolic acid interaction with transcription factors BRAF, V600E, and V600K: a computational approach towards new potential melanoma treatments.

CONTEXT: Melanoma is one of the cancers with the highest mortality rate for its ability to metastasize. Several targets have undergone investigation for the development of drugs against this pathology. One of the main targets is the kinase BRAF (RAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma). The most common mutation in melanoma is BRAFV600E and has been reported in 50-90% of patients with melanoma. Due to the relevance of the BRAFV600E mutation, inhibitors to this kinase have been developed, vemurafenib-OMe and dabrafenib. Ursolic acid (UA) is a pentacyclic triterpene with a privileged structure, the pentacycle scaffold, which allows to have a broad variety of biological activity; the most studied is its anticancer capacity. In this work, we reported the interaction profile of vemurafenib-OMe, dabrafenib, and UA, to define whether UA has binding capacity to BRAFWT, BRAFV600E, and BRAFV600K. Homology modeling of BRAFWT, V600E, and V600K; molecular docking; and molecular dynamics simulations were carried out and interactions and residues relevant to the binding of the inhibitors were obtained. We found that UA, like the inhibitors, presents hydrogen bond interactions, and hydrophobic interactions of van der Waals, and π-stacking with I463, Q530, C532, and F583. The ΔG of ursolic acid in complex with BRAFV600K (- 63.31 kcal/mol) is comparable to the ΔG of the selective inhibitor dabrafenib (- 63.32 kcal/mol) in complex to BRAFV600K and presents a ΔG like vemurafenib-OMe with BRAFWT and V600E. With this information, ursolic acid could be considered as a lead compound for design cycles and to optimize the binding profile and the selectivity towards mutations for the development of new selective inhibitors for BRAFV600E and V600K to new potential melanoma treatments. METHODS: The homology modeling calculations were executed on the public servers I-TASSER and ROBETTA, followed by molecular docking calculations using AutoGrid 4.2.6, AutoDockGPU 1.5.3, and AutoDockTools 1.5.6. Molecular dynamics and metadynamics simulations were performed in the Desmond module of the academic version of the Schrödinger-Maestro 2020-4 program, utilizing the OPLS-2005 force field. Ligand-protein interactions were evaluated using Schrödinger-Maestro program, LigPlot + , and PLIP (protein-ligand interaction profiler). Finally, all of the protein figures presented in this article were made in the PyMOL program.

BRAF inhibitor candidate molecule usnic acid might use both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis.

Background/aim: Melanoma is one of the most aggressive cancers and treatment methods commonly used for patients with skin cancer include checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, traditional chemotherapy drugs, radiation, and adjuvant treatment methods. Due to the resistance and toxic effects that patients develop against the drugs, an effective treatment method has not been developed for melanoma yet. In this study we evaluated the anticancer effect of usnic acid (UA) on A-375 melanoma cells and human epidermal melanocytes using the xCELLigence real-time cell analysis system. Materials and methods: To determine the cell death pathway through which UA exerts its antiproliferative effect, its potential for apoptotic effects was investigated. Caspase-3 and caspase-9 enzyme assays and the expression analysis of 84 genes from the apoptosis pathway were carried out in UA-treated and nontreated A-375 cells. Results: UA was found to have an antiproliferative effect on A-375 cells while it did not have a cytotoxic effect on human epidermal melanocytes. UA treatment led to statistically significant increases in both caspase-3 and caspase-9 enzyme activities. Moreover, the expression levels of 61 genes (mainly proapoptotic genes) were increased and the expression levels of 23 genes (mainly antiapoptotic genes) were decreased in response to UA treatment. This effect might have developed through both the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis pathways; however, the extrinsic pathway was more pronounced. Conclusion: As a result of the obtained findings, it could be concluded that UA might be a promising candidate drug molecule for melanoma treatment in the future through topical application or encapsulation with nanocarriers.

Sequencing of Checkpoint or BRAF/MEK Inhibitors on Brain Metastases in Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the order of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors on the development of brain metastases in patients with metastatic unresectable BRAFV600-mutant melanoma is unknown. The SECOMBIT trial examined the impact of the order of receipt of these treatments in such patients. METHODS: In this three-arm trial, we reviewed patients without brain metastases who received the BRAF/MEK inhibitors encorafenib and binimetinib until they had progressive disease followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab (arm A); or treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by encorafenib and binimetinib (arm B); or treatment with encorafenib and binimetinib for 8 weeks followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by retreatment with encorafenib arm binimetinib (arm C). RESULTS: Brain metastases were discovered during the trial in 23/69 patients in arm A, 11/69 in arm B, and 9/68 in arm C. At a median follow-up of 56 months, the 60-month brain metastases-free survival rates were 56% for arm A, 80% for arm B (hazard ratio [HR] vs. A: 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.58), and 85% for arm C (HR vs. A: 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma, the treatment sequence of immune checkpoint inhibition followed by BRAF/MEK inhibitors was associated with longer periods of new brain metastases-free survival than the reverse sequence. A regimen in which immune checkpoint inhibition was sandwiched between BRAF/MEK inhibition also appeared to be protective against brain metastases. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02631447.).

Cataract Formation in a Child Receiving Dabrafenib and Trametinib Therapy.

The authors report a case of bilateral cataract in a 9-year-old girl after being treated with a combination of the targeted therapy drugs dabrafenib and trametinib. Although adverse effects have been reported with this treatment, this report is the first documented case of cataract as a complication. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(5):e47-e49.].

Confined copper depletion via a hydrogel platform for reversing dabrafenib/cetuximab resistance in BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancer.

BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) is resistant to most first-line therapeutics, including the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab. Although copper depletion shows promise in reversing dabrafenib/cetuximab resistance in BRAFV600E-mutant CRC, its application is limited by the potential for excessive copper depletion in non-tumor objects. In this study, we have developed a hydrogel platform for confined copper depletion in BRAFV600E-mutant CRC cells, which effectively reverses dabrafenib/cetuximab resistance and enhancing therapeutic efficiency. The hydrogel platform enables precise intracellular copper depletion through localized administration, acidity-triggered drug release, and oxidized activation of a copper prochelator. The dosage of this prochelator is 37.5 µg/kg in mouse models, which is significantly lower than the commonly used tetrathiomolybdate. Furthermore, both dabrafenib and the prochelator are preloaded into acid-responsive nanoparticles before being embedded in the hydrogel matrix to facilitate efficient endocytosis and acid-activatable drug release. Confined copper depletion inhibits MEK1 signaling and suppresses the MAPK signaling pathway when combined with BRAF and EGFR inhibitors. Moreover, the hydrogel platform inhibits tumor growth and prolongs survival in subcutaneous and postsurgical models of BRAFV600E-mutant CRC. This study provides an innovative strategy for overcoming dabrafenib/cetuximab resistance in BRAFV600E-mutant CRC through precise intracellular copper depletion.

A real world analysis of secondary BRAF variations after targeted therapy resistance in driver gene positive NSCLC.

Secondary BRAF variations have been identified as a mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with driver gene-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the characteristics and subsequent treatment strategies for these patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with driver gene-positive NSCLC who received TKIs therapy at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between May 2016 and December 2023. The clinical and genetic characteristics of these patients were assessed, along with the impact of various treatment strategies on survival. This study enrolled 27 patients with advanced NSCLC, in whom BRAF variations occurred at a median time of 28 months after the initiation of targeted therapy. The multivariate accelerated failure time (AFT) model revealed that, compared to chemotherapy-based regimens group, the combined targeted therapy group (p < 0.001) and the combined local treatment group for oligo-progression (p < 0.001) significantly extended patient survival. In contrast, continuing the original signaling pathway's targeted monotherapy was associated with shorter survival (p = 0.034). The median global OS for each treatment group was as follows: chemotherapy-based regimens group, 45 months; combined targeted therapy group, 59 months; combined local treatment group for patients with oligo-progression, 46 months; and targeted monotherapy group, 36 months. Study results indicate that the combination targeted therapy group (including TKIs, BRAF inhibitors, and/or MEK inhibitors) and the localized treatment group are more effective than traditional chemotherapy-based regimens in improving survival. Additionally, continuing targeted monotherapy along the original signaling pathway proves less effective than chemotherapy-based regimens.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals melanoma cell state-dependent heterogeneity of response to MAPK inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is a heterogeneous cancer influenced by the plasticity of melanoma cells and their dynamic adaptations to microenvironmental cues. Melanoma cells transition between well-defined transcriptional cell states that impact treatment response and resistance. METHODS: In this study, we applied single-cell RNA sequencing to interrogate the molecular features of immunotherapy-naive and immunotherapy-resistant melanoma tumours in response to ex vivo BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment. FINDINGS: We confirm the presence of four distinct melanoma cell states - melanocytic, transitory, neural-crest like and undifferentiated, and identify enrichment of neural crest-like and undifferentiated melanoma cells in immunotherapy-resistant tumours. Furthermore, we introduce an integrated computational approach to identify subsets of responding and nonresponding melanoma cells within the transcriptional cell states. INTERPRETATION: Nonresponding melanoma cells are identified in all transcriptional cell states and are predisposed to BRAF/MEK inhibitor resistance due to pro-inflammatory IL6 and TNFɑ signalling. Our study provides a framework to study treatment response within distinct melanoma cell states and indicate that tumour-intrinsic pro-inflammatory signalling contributes to BRAF/MEK inhibitor resistance. FUNDING: This work was supported by Macquarie University, Melanoma Institute Australia, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC; grant 2012860, 2028055).

Role of mitochondria and potential of mitochondria-targeted therapy in BRAF mutant cancer: A review.

The classical mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, the Ras/Raf/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase)/ERK protein kinase cascade, is a conserved cascade that regulates cell growth, differentiation, and proliferation. The significance of BRAF in cancer was established with the discovery of cancer-activating mutations in BRAF in several human tumors in 2002. Currently, BRAF is recognized as a driver mutation that affects cancer phenotypes in different ways, making it an important therapeutic target for cancer. BRAF-selective inhibitors have shown promise in clinical trials involving patients with metastatic melanoma. However, resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors therapy have resulted in short-lived therapeutic responses. Further in-depth research is imperative to explore resistance mechanisms that oppose the effectiveness of BRAF inhibitors. Metabolic reprogramming has emerging role in BRAF-mutant cancers. In particular, mitochondrial metabolism and its closely related signaling pathways mediated by mitochondria have become recognized as potential new targets for treating BRAF-mutant cancers. This review, examines the progress in understanding BRAF mutations in cancer, the clinicopathological correlation of BRAF inhibitors, and recent advances in mitochondrial metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics and mitochondrial mediated death in BRAF-mutant cancer. This review will inform future cancer research and lay the foundation for novel treatment combinations of BRAF-mutant cancers.

Characterization of two melanoma cell lines resistant to BRAF/MEK inhibitors (vemurafenib and cobimetinib).

BACKGROUND: BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1)/MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase) inhibitors are used for melanoma treatment. Unfortunately, patients treated with this combined therapy develop resistance to treatment quite quickly, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not yet fully understood. Here, we report and characterize two melanoma cell lines (WM9 and Hs294T) resistant to BRAF (vemurafenib) and MEK (cobimetinib) inhibitors. METHODS: Cell viability was assessed via the XTT test. The level of selected proteins as well as activation of signaling pathways were evaluated using Western blotting. The expression of the chosen genes was assessed by RT-PCR. The distribution of cell cycle phases was analyzed by flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy was used to take photos of spheroids. The composition of cytokines secreted by cells was determined using a human cytokine array. RESULTS: The resistant cells had increased survival and activation of ERK kinase in the presence of BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The IC50 values for these cells were over 1000 times higher than for controls. Resistant cells also exhibited elevated activation of AKT, p38, and JNK signaling pathways with increased expression of EGFR, ErbB2, MET, and PDGFRß receptors as well as reduced expression of ErbB3 receptor. Furthermore, these cells demonstrated increased expression of genes encoding proteins involved in drug transport and metabolism. Resistant cells also exhibited features of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells as well as reduced proliferation rate and elevated cytokine secretion. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, this work describes BRAF/MEK-inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells, allowing for better understanding the underlying mechanisms of resistance. The results may thus contribute to the development of new, more effective therapeutic strategies.

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 5-Amino-4-fluoro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-6-carboxamide Derivatives as Novel and Potential MEK/RAF Complex Inhibitors Based on the "Clamp" Strategy.

Herein, we described the rational drug design and synthesis of a series of 5-amino-4-fluoro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-6-carboxamide derivatives that inhibit MEK and RAF kinases. The detailed screening cascades revealed that 16b was a preferred compound, which might act like a "clamp" to stabilize the MEK/RAF complex, thereby effectively inhibiting MEK1, BRAF, and BRAFV600E with IC50 values of 28, 3, and 3 nM, respectively. 16b possessed an excellent selectivity over other 312 human-related kinases at 1 µM. In vitro, 16b showed potent antiproliferative activities against MIA PaCa-2 (G12C KRAS), HCT116 (G13D KRAS), and C26 (G12D KRAS) cells with IC50 values of 0.011, 0.079, and 0.096 µM, respectively. CoIP experiments demonstrated that 16b could induce MEK/RAF complex formation. Most importantly, in the C26 syngeneic colorectal and HCT116 mice xenograft tumor models, 16b demonstrated tumor growth inhibition of 70 and 93%, respectively, suggesting that 16b may be a promising MEK/RAF complex inhibitor and worthy of further development.

In vivo vulnerabilities to GPX4 and HDAC inhibitors in drug-persistent versus drug-resistant BRAFV600E lung adenocarcinoma.

The current targeted therapy for BRAFV600E-mutant lung cancer consists of a dual blockade of RAF/MEK kinases often combining dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T). This regimen extends survival when compared to single-agent treatments, but disease progression is unavoidable. By using whole-genome CRISPR screening and RNA sequencing, we characterize the vulnerabilities of both persister and D/T-resistant cellular models. Oxidative stress together with concomitant induction of antioxidant responses is boosted by D/T treatment. However, the nature of the oxidative damage, the choice of redox detoxification systems, and the resulting therapeutic vulnerabilities display stage-specific differences. Persister cells suffer from lipid peroxidation and are sensitive to ferroptosis upon GPX4 inhibition in vivo. Biomarkers of lipid peroxidation are detected in clinical samples following D/T treatment. Acquired alterations leading to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) reactivation enhance cystine transport to boost GPX4-independent antioxidant responses. Similarly to BRAFV600E-mutant melanoma, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors decrease D/T-resistant cell viability and extend therapeutic response in vivo.

Multi-omics analysis delineates resistance mechanisms associated with BRAF inhibition in melanoma cells.

Mutant BRAF is a critical oncogenic driver in melanoma, making it an attractive therapeutic target. However, the success of targeted therapy using BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib has been limited due to development of resistance, restricting their clinical efficacy. A prior knowledge of resistance mechanisms to BRAFi or any cancer drug can lead to development of drugs that overcome resistance thus improving clinical outcomes. In vitro cellular models are powerful systems that can be utilized to mimic and study resistance mechanisms. In this study, we employed a multi-omics approach to characterize a panel of BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines to develop and systematically characterize BRAFi persister and resistant cells using exome sequencing, proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Our datasets revealed frequently observed intrinsic and acquired, genetic and non-genetic mechanisms of BRAFi resistance that have been studied in patients who developed resistance. In addition, we identified proteins that can be potentially targeted to overcome BRAFi resistance. Overall, we demonstrate that in vitro systems can be utilized not only to predict resistance mechanisms but also to identify putative therapeutic targets.

Real-world evidence on efficacy and toxicity of targeted therapy in older melanoma patients treated in a tertiary-hospital setting.

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. The median age at diagnosis is 66. While most patients are treated with immunotherapy, the use of targeted therapy is a valid alternative for patients whose tumors harbor a BRAF or c-KIT driver mutation. These agents, while effective, come with a variety of side effects which limit their use, especially in older patients. We sought to assess the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in older melanoma patients. Melanoma patients over 65 treated with BRAF/MEK or c-KIT inhibitors were retrospectively identified, and their data were analyzed for treatment efficacy and toxicity. All data were compared using the Chi-square test for categorical comparisons and the Kruskal-Wallis method for median comparisons. One hundred and sixteen patients were identified. One hundred and six patients were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. The assessed response rate (RR) was 83% and was comparable across different subgroups, including advanced line patients and those with a more aggressive disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.7 months. Twenty-seven percent experienced grade 3-4 toxicity leading to a 24% treatment discontinuation rate. Another 10 patients were treated with the c-KIT inhibitor imatinib, for whom the assessed RR was 55%. The median PFS was 4.3 months, and the median OS was 22.6 months. Forty percent needed dose reductions, yet none had to stop treatment due to adverse effects. The use of targeted therapy in older patients is effective yet challenging due to toxicity. Deploying mitigation strategies can help maximizing their usefulness.

BRAF and MEK inhibitor targeted therapy in papillary craniopharyngiomas: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF/MEK inhibitors has emerged as a potential treatment in papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCPs). However, standardized data on large cohorts are lacking. Our study aimed to assess real-life efficacy and safety of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with PCPs. DESIGN: Retrospective French multicenter study involving BRAF V600E-mutated PCP patients, treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination dabrafenib and trametinib, from April 2019 to July 2023. METHODS: Objective response and clinical and safety outcomes were assessed after 3 months and at the last available follow-up during TT. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (8 females, mean age 50.5 ± 15.75 years), receiving either neoadjuvant therapy (NEO) for non-resectable tumors (n = 6), post-surgical adjuvant therapy (ADJ; n = 8), or palliative therapy (PAL) following failure of multimodal treatment (n = 2), were included.At the last follow-up (mean 7.6 ± 5.3 months), 12 patients showed subtotal response, 3 exhibited partial response, and 1 maintained stable disease. Mean volume reduction was 88.9 ± 4.4%, 73.3 ± 23.4%, and 91.8 ± 4.3% in the NEO, ADJ, and PAL groups, respectively.Targeted therapy resolved headaches in 5/5 patients and visual impairment in 6/9; 2/3 patients had improved neurological symptoms, 1/4 presented weight loss, and 2/14 recovered endocrine function.Targeted therapy was well-tolerated in 62.5% of cases; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 5 patients and definitive discontinuation in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 94% of patients showed partial response or better to TT. Adverse events were acceptable. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols; however, these results advocate for a NEO approach in invasive PCPs.

Evaluation of Pan-RAF Inhibitor LY3009120 on Human Uveal Melanoma Cell Line 92-1.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Uveal melanoma (UM) represents a prevailing primary intraocular malignancy, with a limited median overall survival among metastatic patients, and most tumors lack RAF/RAS mutations. The pan-RAF inhibitor LY3009120 has demonstrated valuable anti-tumor effects in a wide range of RAF/RASmut and wild-type (WT) tumor models. This study aimed to evaluate the antitumor effect of LY3009120 on 92-1 UM cell line. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of the pan-RAF inhibitor LY3009120 on cell proliferation, metabolic activity, biomass, early and late apoptosis/necrosis, and morphology was characterized in vitro (0.1-5 µM for 48 h/72 h). Furthermore, targeted panel sequencing was used to characterize the mutational landscape of the human 92-1 UM cell line. RESULTS: LY3009120 showed a significant concentration-dependent anti-proliferative effect on 92-1 cells. Cell proliferation and viability were significantly reduced at the lowest effective concentration of 0.5 µM (at 48 and 72 h, p<0.001). Furthermore, LY3009120 caused significant early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis in 92-1 cells at 5 µM. Except for TP53, NGS showed that all 49 additional analysed genes (Oncomine myeloid panel) of 92-1 were wild-type, including BRAF, NRAS, and KRAS. CONCLUSION: The pan-RAF inhibitor LY3009120 demonstrated a significant anti-tumor effect on human UM cell line 92-1 independent of the molecular BRAF and RAS mutational status.

Complete response of metastatic microsatellite-stable BRAF V600E colorectal cancer to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade.

The randomized METIMMOX trial (NCT03388190) examined if patients with previously untreated, unresectable abdominal metastases from microsatellite-stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) might benefit from potentially immunogenic, short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alternating with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Three of 38 patients assigned to this experimental treatment had metastases from BRAF-mutant MSS-CRC, in general a poor-prognostic subgroup explored here. The ≥70-year-old females presented with ascending colon adenocarcinomas with intermediate tumor mutational burden (6.2-11.8 mutations per megabase). All experienced early disappearance of the primary tumor followed by complete response of all overt metastatic disease, resulting in progression-free survival as long as 20-35 months. However, they encountered recurrence at previously unaffected sites and ultimately sanctuary organs, or as intrahepatic tumor evolution reflected in the terminal loss of initially induced T-cell clonality in liver metastases. Yet, the remarkable first-line responses to short-course oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy alternating with ICB may offer a novel therapeutic option to a particularly hard-to-treat MSS-CRC subgroup.