Publicações científicas ampliadas uma revisão integrativa / Extended scientific publications: an integrative review / Publicaciones científicas extendidas: una revisión integradora

Objetivo: investigar o estado da arte das publicações científicas ampliadas voltadas para a dinamização da ciência. Método: pesquisa qualitativa de cunho integrativo nas seguintes bases de dados Web of Science, Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts e Scopus via Portal Periódicos Capes, Dimensions, PLOS ONE, Base de Dados Referencial de Artigos de Periódicos em Ciência da Informação e Scientific Eletronic Library Online no período de junho de 2022. Resultados: onze artigos divididos em duas categorias: caracterização das publicações ampliadas e infraestrutura de suporte para as publicações ampliadas. Conclusão: apesar de multivariadas, as publicações ampliadas possuem características peculiares que as tornam objetos digitais compostos e dinâmicos e com melhor experiência para o usuário. Os artigos apontam que não há infraestrutura de suporte nas plataformas de periódicos e quando encontrado, se apresenta simples e com poucos recursos.

Objectives: to investigate the state of the art of expanded scientific publications aimed at boosting science. Method: qualitative research of an integrative nature in the following databases: Web of Science, Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts and Scopus via Portal Periodicals Capes, Dimensions, PLOS ONE, Reference Database of Journal Articles in Science of Information and Scientific Electronic Library Online in the period of June 2022. Results: eleven articles divided into two categories: characterization of expanded publications and support infrastructure for expanded publications. Conclusion: Despite being multivariate, expanded publications have peculiar characteristics that make them composite and dynamic digital objects with a better user experience. The articles point out that there is no support infrastructure on journal platforms and when found, it is simple and with few resources.

Objetivos:investigar el estado del arte de las publicaciones científicas ampliadas destinadas al impulso de la ciência. Método: investigación cualitativa de carácter integrador em las siguients bases de datos: Web of Science, Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts y Scopus vía Portal Periodicals Capes, Dimensions, PLOS ONE, Reference Database of Journal Articles in Science of Information y Scientific Electronic Library Online en el período de junio de 2022. Resultados:once artículos divididos em dos ctegorías: caracterización de publicaciones expandidas e infraestructura de soporte para publicaciones expandidas. Conclusión: a pesar de ser multivariadas, las publicaciones expandidas tienen características peculiares que las convierten em objetos digitales compuestos y dinâmicos com uma mejor ecperiencia de usuário. Los artículos señalan que no existe uma infraestructura de apovo em las plataformas de revistas y cuando se encuentra es sencilla y com pocos recursos.

Conocimiento libre en tiempos de pandemia. Estudio de los artículos "Covid-19" y "Pandemia por Covid-19" en Wikipedia* / Free knowledge in times of pandemic. Study of articles on "Covid-19" and the "Covid-19 pandemic" on Wikipedia / Conhecimento livre em tempos de pandemia. Estudos dos artigos sobre "Covid-19" e "Pandemia por Covid-19" em Wikipédia

Esta investigación estudia los artículos de "Covid-19" y de "Pandemia por Covid-19" en cuatro versiones lingüísticas de Wikipedia (inglés, español, italiano y portugués). El período de estudio comienza con la denominación oficial de la enfermedad como Covid-19, el 11 de febrero de 2020, por la Organización Mundial de la Salud y desde la proclamación por dicha institución de la pandemia causada por esta enfermedad, el 11 de marzo de 2020. En ambos casos se estudia hasta el 11 de abril de 2020. La investigación aborda el modo de creación y de lectura de dichos artículos, analizando si se trata de trabajos construidos desde referencias científicas y sanitarias o prensa generalista. Este proyecto muestra cómo los wikipedistas han reaccionado rápidamente y han generado un gran trabajo colaborativo, con artículos argumentados y construidos desde una perspectiva científica y sanitaria. (AU)

This article studies articles about "Covid-19" and the "Covid-19 pandemic" in four language versions of Wikipedia (English, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese). The study periods start with the official naming of the Covid-19 disease on February 2020 by the World Health Organization and the announcement of the pandemic on March 11 2020, respectively. In both cases, the period goes up to April 11 2020. The study addresses the creation and reading of these publications, analyzing whether they are built upon scientific and health references or information from the general press. The findings show that that the Wikipedists responded quickly and generated collaborative works, with articles based on and built around a scientific and health perspective. (AU)

Este artigo estuda os textos sobre "Covid-19" e "Pandemia por Covid-19" em quatro versões linguísticas da Wikipédia (inglês, espanhol, italiano e português). O período de estudo começa com a denominação oficial da doença como Covid-19, em 11 de fevereiro de 2020, pela Organização Mundial da Saúde e desde a declaração por esta instituição de pandemia causada pela doença, em 11 de março de 2020. Em ambos os casos se estuda até 11 de abril de 2020. A pesquisa aborda o modo de criação e de leitura dessas publicações, analisando se são trabalhos construídos a partir de referências científicas e da saúde ou da imprensa em geral. Este projeto mostra como os wikipedistas reagiram rapidamente e geraram um trabalho colaborativo, com artigos argumentados e construídos a partir de uma perspectiva científica e da saúde. (AU)

Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows.

INTRODUCTION: Open access (OA) publishing rates have risen dramatically in the biomedical sciences in the past decade. However, few studies have focused on the publishing activities and attitudes of early career researchers. The aim of this study was to examine current publishing activities of clinical and research fellows and their perceptions of OA publishing and public access. METHODS: This study employed a mixed methods approach. Data on publications authored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center fellows between 2013 and 2018 were collected via an in-house author profile system and citation indexes. Journals were categorized according to SHERPA/RoMEO classifications. In-person and telephone interviews were conducted with fifteen fellows to discern their perceptions of OA publishing. RESULTS: The total percentage of fellows' publications that were freely available OA was 28.6%, with a relatively flat rate between 2013 and 2018. Publications with fellows as first authors were significantly more likely to be OA. Fellows cited high article processing charges (APCs) and perceived lack of journal quality or prestige as barriers to OA publishing. Fellows generally expressed support for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access policy. CONCLUSIONS: While the fellows in this study acknowledged the potential of OA to aid in research dissemination, they also expressed hesitation to publish OA related to confusion surrounding legitimate OA and predatory publications and frustration with APCs. Fellows supported the NIH public access policy and accepted it as part of their research process. Health sciences information professionals could potentially leverage this acceptance of public access to advocate for OA publishing.

Current State in Scientific Publishing: AOA Critical Issues Symposium.

Orthopaedic surgery has a rich history of publication of the science that supports the practice of our specialty, which dates from 1887. Orthopaedic publishing has evolved since that time, expanding from print to online access, with increasing variation in publication models, including open-access journals and article repositories, and methods of information delivery that include video, data archives, and commentary. This symposium provides an overview of the changes and challenges in the publication of orthopaedic science.

Open Access Journal Policies: A Systematic Analysis of Radiology Journals.

OBJECTIVE: The open access movement has pushed for greater access to scientific knowledge by expanding access to scientific journal articles. There is limited information about the extent to which open access policies have been adopted by radiology journals. We performed a systematic analysis to ascertain the proportion of radiology journals with open access options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was performed with the assistance of a clinical informationist. Full and mixed English-language diagnostic and interventional radiology Web of Science journals (impact factors > 1.0) were included. Nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, physics, and solicitation-only journals were excluded. Primary outcome was open access option (yes or no) with additional outcomes including presence or absence of embargo, complete or partial copyright transfer, publication fees, and self-archiving policies. Secondary outcomes included journal citations, journal impact factors, immediacy, Eigenfactor, and article influence scores. Independent double readings were performed with differences resolved by consensus, supplemented by contacting editorial staff at each journal. RESULTS: In all, 125 journals were identified; review yielded 49 journals (39%, mean impact factor of 2.61). Thirty-six of the journals had open access options (73.4%), and four journals were exclusively open access (8.2%). Twelve-month embargoes were most commonly cited (90.6%) with 28.6% of journals stating that they did not require a complete transfer of copyright. Prices for open access options ranged from $750 to $4,000 (median $3,000). No statistically significant differences were found in journal impact measures comparing journals with open access options to journals without open access options. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic and interventional radiology journals have widely adopted open access options with a few radiology journals being exclusively open access.