Urinary WT1-positive cells as a non-invasive biomarker of crescent formation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between urinary WT1-positive cells (podocytes and active parietal epithelial cells) and WT1-positive cells in renal biopsy to investigate whether urinary WT1-positive cells are useful for detection of crescent formation. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with kidney disease were investigated (15 cases with crescentic lesions and 37 cases with non-crescentic lesions) for immunoenzyme staining using anti-WT1 antibody for urine cytology and renal biopsy. Numbers of WT1-positive cells in urine and renal biopsy were counted. RESULTS: There was no correlation between urinary WT1-positive cells and WT1-positive cells in renal biopsy. However, the number of urinary WT1-positive cells in patients with crescentic lesions was significantly higher than in patients with non-crescentic lesions. In addition, the best cut-off value to detect patients with crescentic lesions using urinary was 5 cells/10-mL (area under the concentration-time curve=0.735). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest urinary WT1-positive cells can be used to detect patients with crescent formation using 5 cells/10-mL cutoff value. WT1-positive glomerular podocytes and parietal epithelial cells may be shed into urine in active glomerular disease. This study, investigating the relationship between WT1-positive cells in urine and in the renal biopsy found no correlation; however, the results do suggest that, using a cutoff value of 5 cells/10 mL, WT1 positive urinary cells can be used to detect patients with crescent formation.

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of UBC® Rapid in bladder cancer: a Swedish multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of UBC® Rapid - a urine-based marker for bladder cancer - in patients with bladder cancer and controls, and to compare the test results across risk groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective phase II study was conducted at four Swedish hospitals. UBC Rapid was evaluated in four groups: A, newly diagnosed bladder cancer (n = 94); B, follow-up of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (n = 75); C, benign urinary tract diseases (n = 51); and D, healthy controls (n = 50). Tumours were divided into high risk (carcinoma in situ, TaG3, T1, T2 and T3) and low risk (low malignant potential, TaG1 and TaG2). Urine samples were quantitatively analysed by UBC Rapid. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated based on optimal cut-off (receiver operator characteristics curve analysis). A linear regression compared the UBC Rapid results in the different risk groups. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off was 8.1 µg/l. The median UBC Rapid values were 9.3 µg/l [interquartile range (IQR) 30.9] and 4.3 µg/l (IQR 7.8) in patients with positive and negative cystoscopy, respectively (p < .001). The value for group A was 15.6 µg/l (IQR 37.9), group B 5.6 µg/l (IQR 8.6), group C 5.1 µg/l (IQR 9.0) and group D 3.3 µg/l (IQR 7.1). Sensitivity was 70.8%, specificity 61.4%, PPV 71.3% and NPV 60.8%. The high-risk group had significantly higher UBC Rapid values than the low-risk group: 20.5 µg/l (IQR 42.2), sensitivity 79.2% and specificity 61.4% versus 7.0 µg/l (IQR 9.9), sensitivity 60.0% and specificity 61.4% (p = .039). CONCLUSIONS: The UBC Rapid urine-based marker for bladder cancer gave higher values in patients with positive than in those with negative cystoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy was better in patients with high-risk than in those with low-risk tumours, and was better during primary detection than during surveillance.

Expression of vimentin and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin (clone 34ßE12) in differentiating reactive renal tubular cells from low-grade urothelial carcinoma cells in voided urine.

OBJECTIVE: Reactive renal tubular cells show features of an atypical repair reaction. Differentiation between reactive renal tubular cells and low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LG-UC) cells can therefore be a diagnostic challenge based on morphology alone. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of vimentin and a high-molecular-weight cytokeratin antibody (clone 34ßE12) in differentiating reactive renal tubular cells from LG-UC. METHODS: We evaluated voided urine cytology and surgical specimens from 40 patients with renal disease, and 17 patients with LG-UC. All slides were stained with vimentin and 34ßE12. RESULTS: In the reactive renal tubular cells in voided urine cytology, vimentin showed strong cytoplasmic staining in 39/40 (97.5%) cases, but all were negative for 34ßE12. LG-UC cells showed positive staining for 34ßE12 in 3/17 (17.6%) cases, whereas none were positivity for vimentin. The reactive renal tubular cells of histological specimens in the renal disease group demonstrated positive for vimentin in all 40 cases and all were negative for 34ßE12. The LG-UC group showed abnormal staining for 34ßE12 in 4/17 (23.5%) cases, whereas none were positive for vimentin. CONCLUSIONS: Vimentin expression in urine cytology can help to distinguish reactive renal tubular cells from LG-UC. However, 34ßE12 does not appear to be a useful adjunct to distinguish these two groups in voided urine cytology.

Focus on urinary bladder cancer markers: a review.

Finding and development of new bladder cancer markers is still a very dynamic field. Because of the mass of all these markers it is impossible to report all of them. This paper reviews the role of bladder cancer markers in diagnosis and highlights the most important biomarkers studied and reported recently. A medline based literature search was performed to examine the field of bladder cancer markers. Major topics focus on selected bladder cancer markers from nearly all categories of the wide field of bladder cancer markers: Hematuria, FISH, FGFR3, SURVIVIN, u-PAR, TP53 mutation, HER-2/neu, TPA, NMP22, CK-19, CK-20, CYFRA 21-1. The use and clinical importance as diagnostic help are discussed. In this review a highlight to some of the most important markers was made. Further determination of recurrence and progression marker will contribute to establish better treatments for the individual patient. Molecular staging of urological tumors will allow selecting cases that will require systemic treatment. It is necessary and important to integrate under the same objectives basic and clinical research.

Evaluation of urine tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor, CYFRA 21-1, and urinary bladder cancer antigen for detection of high-grade bladder carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of urine tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI), CYFRA 21-1, which measures cytokeratin 19 fragment, and urinary bladder carcinoma antigen (UBC) for the detection of high-grade bladder carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 160 individuals were enrolled in the present study. Of these, 80 were patients with proven primary high-grade urothelial bladder cancer (group 1), 40 were healthy volunteers (group 2), and 40 had history of benign urologic disease (group 3). All were evaluated with respect to urinary TATI, CYFRA 21-1, and UBC levels. All these markers were evaluated using commercial kits. Cytology was also performed. RESULTS: The TATI measurements were significant greater in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3. The cutoff point used for TATI, CYFRA 21-1, and UBC was 22, 2.8, and 12 microg/L, respectively. The overall sensitivity was 85.7% for TATI, 61.9% for CYFRA 21-1, 50% for UBC, and 42.8% for cytology. TATI was significantly more sensitive in Stage Ta (80%) than was CYFRA 21-1 (32%), UBC (12%), and cytology (20%). TATI was also more sensitive compared with other tumor markers for Stage T1 but not for Stage T2 or T3. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that TATI is a promising urinary tumor marker for high-grade urothelial bladder cancer. It is more sensitive than CYFRA 21-1, UBC, and cytology for Stage Ta and T1 bladder cancer.

Combined assay of CYFRA21-1, telomerase and vascular endothelial growth factor in the detection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: CYFRA21-1, telomerase and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are regarded as useful tumor markers in the detection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma. However, the sensitivity of each single marker seemed to be unsatisfactory. In the current study, we assessed the sensitivity of the combined assay of these three markers in the detection of human bladder transitional cell carcinoma. METHODS: Voided urine samples of 100 patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma were obtained and each sample was aliquoted for the various assay. Urinary CYFRA21-1 and VEGF were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and telomerase detected by the telomeric repeat amplification protocol. The sensitivity of combined assay was compared to that of each single marker and urinary cytology, respectively. RESULTS: In the 100 patients, the sensitivity was 74% for urinary CYFRA21-1, 71% for telomerase, 69% for VEGF, and 38% for cytology. CYFRA21-1, telomerase and VEGF proved significantly more sensitive than cytology, respectively (P = 0.000). The sensitivity of the combined assay in the current study was 94% and it was significantly higher than that of cytology, urinary telomerase, CYFRA21-1 or VEGF (P = 0.000). In 50 patients with hematuria but without bladder cancer, the overall specificity of the assays was 78% for CYFRA21-1, 84% for telomerase, 88% for VEGF, and 92% for cytology. CONCLUSIONS: Combined assay of the markers which show different characteristics of the tumor behaviors seemed to be of interest in the detection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma.

Urinary CYFRA 21.1 is not a useful marker for the detection of recurrences in the follow-up of superficial bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this prospective study is to establish an appropriate cutoff value of urinary CYFRA 21.1 assay and to assess its utility combined with voided cytology and/or haemoglobin dipstick in the follow-up of patients with superficial bladder cancer. METHODS: From December 2000 to November 2003, 446 patients in follow-up for superficial bladder cancer (Ta-T1) after transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) were included in a prospective study. Voided urine specimens were collected 7-14 d before cystoscopy and/or TURB for CYFRA 21.1 (one sample), haemoglobin dipstick (one sample), and cytology (three samples). All samples were processed for CYFRA 21.1 and haemoglobin dipstick according to manufacturer instructions. A control group (n=185) was obtained from patients in follow-up after transurethral resection of superficial disease (without recurrences within the following 6 mo). There were 125 recurrent transitional tumours detected by cystoscopy (34 TaG1; 53 TaG2/T1G1-2; 23 Ta-1G3/Tis, and 15 T2-4). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and cutoff values were chosen. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV (positive predictive value), NPV (negative predictive value), and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: ROC curve analysis based on the previously reported cutoff value of 4ng/ml for CYFRA 21.1 demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 43% and 68%, respectively. At a cutoff value of 1.5ng/ml, sensitivity was 73.8% with a low specificity (41%). Further lowering of the cutoff point below 1.5ng/ml did not demonstrate a significant increase in sensitivity. Therefore, this value was chosen as the most sensitive CYFRA 21.1 cutoff point during the rest of the study. Specificity increased when all the patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy or with UTI, urethral catheterisation, and intravesical instillations within 3 previous months were not included in our analysis. CYFRA 21.1 plus cytology and the combination of CYFRA 21.1, cytology, and haemoglobin dipstick demonstrated the highest overall sensitivities, and detected 91.3% of Ta-1G3 tumours and 93.3% of T2-4 tumours. However, there were one muscle-invasive tumour, two T1G3/Tis, three T1G2, and nine T1G1 neoplasms with negative combination of cytology and CYFRA 21.1 (1,5ng/ml). All these tumours were smaller than 2cm in size; most were single tumours. Nevertheless, there were 16 tumours larger than 0.5cm (0.5-2cm), and multiple neoplasms were endoscopically detected in 14 patients. Similar results were obtained through the combination of CYFRA 21.1 (cutoff: 1.5ng/ml), cytology, and haemoglobin dipstick. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience the low sensitivity of urinary CYFRA 21.1, even using lower cutoff values and/or a combination with cytology and/or haemoglobin dipstick, makes its application not very useful as a surveillance tool for superficial bladder carcinoma.

Pre and postoperative quantitative detection of fragments of cytokeratins 8 and 18 (UBC IRMA) as markers of early recurrence of superficial bladder tumor.

OBJECTIVES: The Urinary Bladder Cancer (UBC) test is a marker that detects urinary fragments of cytokeratin 8 and 18. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of the pre and post operative UBC test to detect early recurrences of a bladder tumor in the first year after the transurethral resection of a bladder tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentric perspective study on 36 patients with superficial bladder cancer (pTa-pT1) treated with transurethral resection (TUR) was performed. Each patient underwent 4 specific urine collections: 1) preoperatively, 2) 3 days after TUR, 3) 7 days after TUR, 4) 30 days after TUR. UBC was analysed on urine with the IRMA method and the cut off value of 12 mg/L was used. Cystoscopy was performed after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after TUR, with the aim of identifying all cancer recurrences in the first year postoperatively. Statistical analyses to identify differences between patients with or without early recurrence were performed in accordance with Fisher's exact test and Chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients included in the study 15 showed early recurrence and 21 were recurrence free 1 year after surgery. UBC levels measured in recurrence free patients 30 days after TUR showed normal values, values decreasing as compared with preoperative levels or both circumstances, even if a statistically significant difference was not found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we reported an insignificant correlation between the postoperative modifications of UBC levels and the risk of tumor recurrence during the first year of follow-up. A larger study group with longer follow-ups will probably allow better evaluation of the real power of UBC tests in clinical practice.

Rapid diagnosis and follow up of bladder cancer patients using urinary high molecular weight cytokeratins.

We have developed an office-based dot-EIA for the detection of a urinary high molecular weight cytokeratin (CK). Immunohistochemical staining and western blot based on CK1K10 monoclonal antibody were used to identify the CK. Urine of 192 patients with different types, grades, and stages of bladder tumor and 72 controls were evaluated using dot-EIA. An intense and diffuse cytoplasmic reaction was shown in bladder squamous cell carcinoma. The target epitope was identified in urine at 65, 56, and 40-kDa. The CK purified from urine showed single polypeptide at 65-kDa using SDS-PAGE and single peak at 7.4 min using capillary zone electrophoresis. The dot-EIA detected the CK with high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (94%). The CK was not detected in urine of bladder cancer patients showing response to radiotherapy. The sensitive and specific office-based detection of urinary cytokeratin would be helpful in rapid diagnosis and follow up of bladder carcinoma.

Prognostic value of cytology, nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test, and urinary bladder cancer II (UBC II) test in early recurrent transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

This study addresses the diagnostic value of the Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 (NMP22) test and the Urinary Bladder Cancer (UBC II) test, in comparison to bladder wash cytology for the detection of early recurrence of bladder cancer. Patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (TCC, n = 60) and patients with benign urological diseases (n = 30) were included in this study. Voided urine samples were divided into 2 aliquots: aliquot 1 was assayed for NMP22 and aliquot 2 was tested for UBC II. Saline bladder washings were used for cytologic examination. Urine samples from TCC patients were collected before transurethral resection and on postoperative day 10. On day 10, 15 NMP22 results and 7 UBC II results exceeded the normal ranges; 4 of the cytology samples were positive for malignancy. Based on cystoscopic findings at 3 mo post-resection, 21 of the cases were classified as early recurrence; 11 of the early recurrences had been in the elevated NMP22 group, 4 in the elevated UBC II group, and 3 in the positive cytology group at 10 days post-resection. The NMP22 test gave the highest sensitivity for detecting early recurrent tumors (11 of 21, 52%). Such high sensitivity did not occur with the UBC II test (4 of 21, 19%) or cytology (3 of 21, 14%). These differences were significant (p = 0.024 and 0.009, respectively). Thus, the NMP22 test showed superiority over the other tests for detection of early recurrence of bladder cancer.

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of urinary cytokeratin 8 and 18 fragments compared with voided urine cytology in diagnosis of bladder carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of urine tests based on the detection of cytokeratins 8 and 18 for the diagnosis of bladder cancer compared with urine cytology. METHODS: Samples from 112 patients before transurethral resection (group 1), 40 patients before secondary surgical treatment (group 2), 29 healthy control subjects (group 3, controls), and 10 women with acute urinary tract infection (group 4, controls) were examined with the UBC Rapid and UBC II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests and voided urine cytology. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients in group 1, 90 had transitional cell carcinoma. For the UBC Rapid, UBC ELISA, and cytology, the sensitivity and specificity was 64.4%, 46.6%, and 70.5% and 63.6%, 86.3%, and 79.5%, respectively. The cytology had the greatest accuracy (72.3%) compared with both cytokeratin tests (54.4% and 64.2%). For all three tests, sensitivity increased with tumor grade and stage. In group 2, 16 of 40 patients had residual carcinoma. The sensitivity was similar for all three tests, and the specificity of cytology was lower compared with its specificity in group 1 (47.9% versus 70.5% in group 1). In the controls with or without urinary tract infection, the specificity of cytology was greater than that of both other tests. The combination of the UBC ELISA test with cytology increased the sensitivity to 83% (specificity 68%). CONCLUSIONS: Both cytokeratin tests detected patients with transitional cell carcinoma, but were inferior to voided urine cytology in test quality.

Late recurrence of renal cholesteatoma after 15 years.

We report a late recurrence of a cholesteatoma of the left kidney after 15 years. Both the initial case and the recurrence were treated by endourologic and percutaneous approaches.

Comparison of urine cell characteristics by flow cytometry and cytology in patients suspected of having bladder cancer.

The diagnosis of bladder cancer is confirmed by histological analysis of tissue biopsies. Cytology of urine samples is a noninvasive alternative. The aim of this work was to find out whether flow cytometry of urine samples is more sensitive than cytology. For this purpose we studied 115 patients suspected of having bladder cancer. Cells isolated from urine samples were analyzed by cytometry for the expression of cytokeratin and CD 45 and for DNA measurements such as: DNA index, synthesis phase fraction and proliferative index (SPF + G2/M phase). At the same time we carried out cytological analysis. All positive cases were confirmed by histology (21/115), 18 were diagnosed by flow cytometry and 16 by cytology, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and 76.1%, respectively. Two cases were found to be positive by flow cytometry, which were not confirmed by histology, while no false positives were detected by cytology. We found that both techniques gave almost identical results for the diagnosis of bladder cancer, although there were differences in non-malignant samples. In conclusion, flow cytometry is slightly more sensitive than cytology but the combination of the two techniques improves the diagnosis.

Qualitative and quantitative detection of urinary human complement factor H-related protein (BTA stat and BTA TRAK) and fragments of cytokeratins 8, 18 (UBC rapid and UBC IRMA) as markers for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of BTA stat, BTA TRAK, UBC Rapid, UBC IRMA and voided urinary cytology in the detection of bladder transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). METHODS: The study included 78 patients with TCC of the bladder (group A), 62 patients with a history of bladder TCC without tumor recurrence at the time of examination (B, control group), 20 patients with other malignancy of the urinary tract (C), 38 patients with non-malignant urinary tract diseases (D), 10 patients with urinary tract infection (E) and 10 healthy volunteers (F). Except in group F, voided urine was collected before cystoscopy or cystectomy. RESULTS: The specificity and sensitivity in bladder cancer detection were 87.1 and 74.4%, respectively with BTA stat, 79.3 and 48.7%, respectively with UBC Rapid, 100 and 33.3%, respectively with cytology, 72.6 and 75.6%, respectively with BTA TRAK, 64.5 and 70.5%, respectively with UBC IRMA. CONCLUSIONS: The BTA stat and BTATRAK tests are superior to UBC Rapid, UBC IRMA and urinary cytology in detection of bladder TCC. In daily practice however cytology remains the best adjunct to cystoscopy because of its high sensitivity in Tis and 100% specificity. Cystoscopy cannot be replaced by any of evaluated methods.

Diagnostic performance of the urinary bladder carcinoma antigen ELISA test and multiparametric DNA/cytokeratin flow cytometry in urine voided samples from patients with bladder carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to comparatively analyze the sensitivity and specificity of flow cytometric DNA/cytokeratin 8/18 measurements and the urinary bladder carcinoma antigen (UBC) enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) test for the detection of bladder carcinoma in voided urine samples. METHODS: Eighty-one fresh urine voided samples, preserved frozen for a maximum period of 3 months, belonging to patients with an active bladder carcinoma (n = 37), patients who were free of disease as confirmed by cystoscopy (n = 19), patients receiving intravesical therapy (n = 17), and individuals with other benign and malignant conditions (n = 8), were collected. Flow cytometry measurements of thawed samples were based on the detection of cytokeratin (CK) 8+ and CK18+ cells using the 3F3 and 6D7 monoclonal antibodies alone or in combination with the measurement of cell DNA contents, after propidium iodide staining. Urinary bladder carcinoma antigen test was measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Patients were grouped according to the presence (n = 44) or absence (n = 29) of bladder carcinoma as confirmed by cystoscopy, and taking cutoffs of 9.7 microg/L for UBC-ELISA, 75% for the percentage of 3F3 (+) and 6D7 (+) cells, and 10.6% for the proportion of hyperdiplod cells that suggested a specificity of 83%, the individual sensitivity obtained for each parameter was 77%, 5%, 9%, and 77%, respectively. The presence of DNA aneuploid populations showed a relatively low sensitivity (36%) although it was the most specific parameter (93%). Combining UBC antigen test with the proportion of cells showing DNA content higher than 2n increased to 89% the sensitivity of the UBC antigen alone. However, false-positive results for both techniques were found in individuals with urologic diseases other than bladder carcinoma and in patients receiving intravesical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results suggest that the combined use of the UBC antigen test and DNA/cytokeratin flow cytometry double stainings for the analysis of freshly obtained urine voided samples, cryopreserved to assure cellular integrity, is of great clinical utility for the detection of tumor recurrence in patients with bladder carcinoma.

Bladder cancer. II. Molecular aspects and diagnosis.

The current system used to classify bladder carcinoma by stage and histological grade is very useful, yet still has limited ability to predict the natural history, or treated natural history, of a bladder tumor. Cystoscopy and urine cytology are currently the gold standard in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder cancer. Classical urine cytology, however, at least in the diagnosis of G1 tumors, is definitely characterized by a relative low sensitivity. The low sensitivity and subjective interpretation of cytology led to the development of several tests to detect bladder cancer in urine. We provide a current, comprehensive review of the literature on bladder tumor markers and summarize their diagnostic potential. In conclusion, under the premise that cystoscopy has never been subjected to evaluation, no diagnostic marker with a sensitivity and specificity comparable to cystoscopy currently exists. The combined analysis of several tumor markers, as in the Immunocyt test, seems to be the most promising approach. In the future, rather highly sensitive tests may be able to replace cystoscopy or prolong the intervals of cystoscopies in the follow-up of selected patients.

Urine based markers of urological malignancy.

PURPOSE: A number of urine based markers have been and are being investigated for the diagnosis and prognostication of urological conditions. A majority of these markers have been evaluated in urological neoplasms, particularly bladder cancer. The diagnosis of bladder cancer currently relies on identifying malignant cells in the urine and subsequently visualizing the tumor on cystoscopy. This diagnosis is further confirmed by transurethral resection or biopsy. While urine cytology is specific, it is not sensitive, especially for detecting low grade disease. This characteristic has prompted the search for more accurate markers of bladder cancer. In this review we critically examine the results of studies evaluating various markers for bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The published literature on urine based markers for all urological diseases, particularly bladder cancer, was identified using a MEDLINE search and critically analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the various markers were compared. The benefit of using combined markers rather than a single marker was also analyzed from published reports. RESULTS: Most published literature on urine based markers for urological malignancies involve such markers for diagnosing and prognosticating bladder cancer. Hence, we focused mainly on urine based markers in bladder cancer. Most markers appear to have an advantage over urine cytology in terms of sensitivity, especially for detecting low grade, superficial tumors. However, most markers tend to be less specific than cytology, yielding more false-positive results. This scenario is more common in patients with concurrent bladder inflammation or other benign bladder conditions. However, there is reason to be optimistic about several new markers that appear to provide better specificity. Few urine based markers have been identified and investigated in other urological tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Detecting bladder cancer using diagnostic markers still presents a challenge. A number of new markers are currently available that appear to be significantly more accurate than cytology. However, further studies involving a larger number of patients are required to determine their accuracy and widespread applicability for diagnosing bladder cancer. Urine based markers do not appear to have a significant role in the diagnosis or prognosis of other urological malignancies, such as prostate, kidney or testicular cancer.

Urinary bladder cancer test: a new urinary tumor marker in the follow-up of superficial bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To study the diagnostic performance of the Urinary Bladder Cancer (UBC) test in patients with superficial bladder carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred one patients in follow-up for superficial bladder cancer (pTa, pT1, carcinoma in situ) were recruited for this study. Each patient underwent cystoscopy and transurethral resection or biopsy, with subsequent histologic confirmation in the case of abnormalities. In addition, specimens were assessed with an immunoenzymometric assay for cytokeratin expression (the UBC test), and the urinary creatinine concentration was determined to correct for different degrees of urinary dilution. Different methods were applied to calculate the diagnostic value of the UBC test. RESULTS: Both noncorrected and corrected median values of the UBC test were comparable between patients with and without a recurrent bladder tumor. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the noncorrected UBC test was 20.7%, 84.7%, 35.3%, and 72.6%, respectively. For the corrected UBC test, the corresponding values were 20.7%, 79.2%, 28.6%, and 71.3%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was not significantly different from 0.50, indicating no diagnostic value of the UBC test in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic value of this new urinary marker appears insufficient for the follow-up of patients with superficial bladder cancer.