Differential activity and selectivity of N-terminal modified CXCL12 chemokines at the CXCR4 and ACKR3 receptors.

Chemokines play critical roles in numerous physiologic and pathologic processes through their action on seven-transmembrane (TM) receptors. The N-terminal domain of chemokines, which is a key determinant of signaling via its binding within a pocket formed by receptors' TM helices, can be the target of proteolytic processing. An illustrative case of this regulatory mechanism is the natural processing of CXCL12 that generates chemokine variants lacking the first two N-terminal residues. Whereas such truncated variants behave as antagonists of CXCR4, the canonical G protein-coupled receptor of CXCL12, they are agonists of the atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3/CXCR7), suggesting the implication of different structural determinants in the complexes formed between CXCL12 and its two receptors. Recent analyses have suggested that the CXCL12 N-terminus first engages the TM helices of ACKR3 followed by the receptor N-terminus wrapping around the chemokine core. Here we investigated the first stage of ACKR3-CXCL12 interactions by comparing the activity of substituted or N-terminally truncated variants of CXCL12 toward CXCR4 and ACKR3. We showed that modification of the first two N-terminal residues of the chemokine (K1R or P2G) does not alter the ability of CXCL12 to activate ACKR3. Our results also identified the K1R variant as a G protein-biased agonist of CXCR4. Comparative molecular dynamics simulations of the complexes formed by ACKR3 either with CXCL12 or with the P2G variant identified interactions between the N-terminal 2-4 residues of CXCL12 and a pocket formed by receptor's TM helices 2, 6, and 7 as critical determinants for ACKR3 activation.

Proteolytic chemokine cleavage as a regulator of lymphocytic infiltration in solid tumors.

In the past decade, immune-based therapies such as monoclonal antibodies against tumor epitopes or immune checkpoint inhibitors have become an integral part of contemporary cancer treatment in many entities. However, a fundamental prerequisite for the success of such therapies is a sufficient trafficking of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes into the tumor microenvironment. This infiltration is facilitated by chemokines, a group of about 50 small proteins capable of chemotactically guiding leukocytes. Proteolytic inactivation of chemokines leading to an impaired infiltration of immune effector cells appears to be an efficient immune escape mechanism of solid cancers.The CXCR3 and CX3CR1 chemokine receptor ligands CXCL9-11 and CX3CL1, respectively, are mainly responsible for the tumor-suppressive lymphocytic infiltration into the tumor micromilieu. Their structure explains the biochemical basis of their proteolytic cleavage, while in vivo data from mouse models and patient samples shed light on the corresponding processes in cancer. The emerging roles of proteases, e.g., matrix metalloproteinases, cathepsins, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4, in chemokine inactivation define new resistance mechanisms against immunotherapies and identify attractive new targets to enhance immune intervention in cancer.

Conformational analysis of the human chemokine receptor CXCR3.

In the last years, some studies showed the patho-genetic role of CXCR3 bound to its ligands in many human inflammatory diseases and cancers. Thus, the blockage of the CXCR3 interaction site to its ligands is seen as a possible therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer. The presence of flexible regions in the chemokine receptors determines their capability to develop specific mechanisms of action. We have recently focused on the features of the N-terminal region of human CXCR3 free in solution, where we demonstrate the presence of numerous conformational ensembles, dynamically stabilized by H-bonds. Since up to now no structure was experimentally determined for CXCR3, we decided to approach the study of its conformational behavior by molecular dynamics simulations, in a lipid bilayer, surrounded of water, at neutral pH and 300K. Furthermore, we modeled the CXCR3/CXCL11 complex, where CXCL11 is one of its natural ligands. The aim of this work is to have a vision as realistic as possible in dynamic terms of the biological mechanism that drives the search for the ligand, its interaction and the formation of a stable complex between CXCR3 and CXCL11. Overall, our approach has been able to describe the structural events which dynamically characterize the molecular mechanisms involved in the binding of CXCR3 to CXCL11 and the critical role exerted by its N-terminal region in "hunting" and capturing the ligand.

[Preparation and bioactivity evaluation of streptavidin-tagged human interferon- inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant bifunctional fusion protein].

OBJECTIVE: To prepare streptavidin-tagged human interferon-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant bifunctional fusion proteins (SA/hI-TAC) and evaluate its biological activity. METHODS: pET24a-SA-hI-TAC/pET21a-hI-TAC-SA plasmids were constructed and expressed in BL21. SA-hI-TAC and hI-TAC-SA fusion proteins were purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, refolded by dialysis and identified by Western blotting. The bifunctionality of the fusion proteins (biotin-binding function and hI-TAC activity) was analyzed by flow cytometry and lymphocyte chemotaxis experiment, respectively. RESULTS: SA-hI-TAC/hI-TAC-SA fusion proteins were expressed at about 12% and 25% of the total bacterial protein, respectively. The two fusion proteins had a purity of about 85% and 90% after purification, and their purity reached 98% after purification with S-100 gel filtration chromatography. Both of the fusion proteins were efficiently immobilized on the surface of biotinylated mouse bladder cancer MB49 cells (91.3% for SA-hI-TAC and 98.8% for hI-TAC-SA). SA/hI-TAC induced lymphocyte chemotaxis in a dose-dependent manner, and hI-TAC-SA showed a stronger chemotactic effect than SA-hI-TAC. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully obtained SA/hI-TAC bifunctional fusion proteins, which may potentially be used in local treatment of tumor and as a tumor vaccine.

The N-terminal region of CXCL11 as structural template for CXCR3 molecular recognition: synthesis, conformational analysis, and binding studies.

The chemokines and their receptors play a key role in immune and inflammatory responses by promoting recruitment and activation of different subpopulations of leukocytes. The membrane receptor CXCR3 binds three chemokines, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, and its involvement is recognized in many inflammatory diseases and cancers. Therefore, the inhibition of CXCR3 pathway through interactions with three ligands was indicated as putative therapeutic target for the treatment of these diseases, and some inhibitory compounds have already been described in the literature. Recently, we studied the interaction between CXCR3 and its three natural ligands and showed that three CXCR3 ligands bound the receptor mainly by their N-terminal regions using aromatic and electrostatic interactions, and, in particular, CXCL11 had the highest affinity for CXCR3. In light of these results, we focused our attention on what structural region(s) of CXCL11 interacted with CXCR3 and what were the structural features. Therefore, we have synthesized three peptides, corresponding to the N-terminal region of CXCL11, but with different aromatic amino acids, analyzed their conformations by circular dichroism, NMR, and molecular dynamics simulations, simulated their complexes with CXCR3 by docking methods, and validated these data by in vitro studies. The results showed that two peptides were able to bind CXCR3 and to mimic the molecular recognition of CXCL11 and demonstrated that N-terminal region of CXCL11 can be used as template and starting point to obtain new molecules by de novo design approaches.

CXCR3/ligands are significantly involved in the tumorigenesis of basal cell carcinomas.

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin malignancy encountered worldwide. We hypothesized that CXC chemokines, small cytokines involved in inducing directed leukocyte chemotaxis, could play a key role in the modulation of BCC growth. In this study, quantitative RT-PCR revealed that the chemokines CXCL9, 10, 11, and their receptor CXCR3 were significantly upregulated by an average 22.6-fold, 9.2-fold, 26.6-fold, and 4.9-fold, respectively in BCC tissue samples as compared with nonlesional skin epithelium. Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that CXCR3, CXCL10, and CXCL11, but not CXCL9, colocalized with cytokeratin 17 (K17) in BCC keratinocytes. In addition, CXCR3 and its ligands were expressed in cells of the surrounding BCC stroma. The chemokines and K17 were also expressed in cultured human immortalized HaCaT keratinocytes. Exposure of HaCaT cells or primary BCC-derived cells to CXCL11 peptides in vitro significantly increased cell proliferation. In primary BCC-derived cell cultures, addition of CXCL11 progressively selected for K17+/CXCR3+ co-expressing cells over time. The expression of CXCR3 and its ligands in human BCC keratinocytes, the enhancement of keratinocyte cell proliferation by CXCL11, and the homogeneity of K17+ BCC cells in human BCC-isolated cell population supported by CXCR3/CXCL11 signaling all suggest that CXCR3 and its ligands may be important autocrine and/or paracrine signaling mediators in the tumorigenesis of BCC.

Modelling of the membrane receptor CXCR3 and its complexes with CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 chemokines: putative target for new drug design.

The chemokines play a key role in immune and inflammatory responses by promoting recruitment and activation of different subpopulations of leukocytes. These comprise over 50 proteins grouped into four classes, in basis to the arrangement of conserved cysteine residues within the sequence. CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 are the members of the family of ELR-CXC chemokines and bind the same CXCR3 receptor. During the past few years, several studies have demonstrated a pathogenetic role of CXCR3 and its ligands in many human inflammatory diseases. The blockade of CXCR3 interactions with its ligands has been suggested as a possible therapeutic target for the treatment of these diseases. Therefore, we modelled the three-dimensional structure of CXCL9 and CXCR3, and, successively, of the CXCL9/CXCR3 complex in comparison to CXCL10/CXCR3 and CXCL11/CXCR3 complexes. We have then shown the structural determinants of these interactions and their physico-chemical features. Finally, the interaction residues involved in the formation of the complexes have been highlighted and analyzed in order to be used for drug design.

Stromal cell-derived factors 1alpha and 1beta, inflammatory protein-10 and interferon-inducible T cell chemo-attractant are novel substrates of dipeptidyl peptidase 8.

N-terminal truncation of chemokines by proteases including dipeptidyl peptidase (DP) IV significantly alters their biological activity; generally ablating cognate G-protein coupled receptor engagement and often generating potent receptor antagonists. DP8 is a recently recognised member of the prolyl oligopeptidase gene family that includes DPIV. Since DPIV is known to process chemokines we surveyed 27 chemokines for cleavage by DP8. We report DP8 cleavage of the N-terminal two residues of IP10 (CXCL10), ITAC (CXCL11) and SDF-1 (CXCL12). This has implications for DP8 substrate specificity. Chemokine cleavage and inactivation may occur in vivo upon cell lysis and release of DP8 or in the inactivation of internalized chemokine/receptor complexes.