A phase II study of anlotinib plus whole brain radiation therapy for patients with NSCLC with multiple brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the mainstay of treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with multiple brain metastases (BMs); however, the BRAIN study showed that the efficacy of WBRT is unsatisfactory. This prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with anlotinib, a novel anti-angiogenic multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), in patients with multiple BMs (>3) from advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC with multiple BMs who had received two or more lines of treatment were eligible for enrolment into this study. All patients were treated with anlotinib (8-12 mg, QD, on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) combined with WBRT (DT 30 Gy/12 F), followed by maintenance therapy with anlotinib until disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary endpoint of this study was the intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). The secondary endpoints were intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial disease control rate (iDCR), overall survival (OS) and treatment safety. RESULTS: Between May 2019 and January 2021, 28 patients were enrolled, all of whom were evaluable for efficacy and safety. The median age was 57.7 years, and 46.4% were male. Twenty-five patients had adenocarcinoma (89.3%), six had EGFR mutations (21.4%) and two had ALK mutations (7.1%). The median iPFS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.4-16.8 months) and the median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 5.2-21.6 months). The iORR was 71.4% (six complete responses + 14 partial responses). The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (71.4%), fatigue (64.3%), anorexia (46.4%), and foot and hand skin reactions (25.0%). No patients developed ≥ grade 4 AEs. No intracranial haemorrhages occurred during treatment. Dose adjustment due to AEs occurred in 17.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib combined with WBRT is effective and well-tolerated in patients with NSCLC with multiple BMs.

Efficacy and safety of Anlotinib based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib, an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown the ability to inhibit tumor angiogenesis. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TEC) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced TNBC. METHODS: Locally advanced TNBC patients who had received no prior systemic treatment were eligible for this study. The enrolled patients were scheduled to undergo six cycles of anlotinib (12 mg, d1-14, q3w) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w), epirubicin (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, d1, q3w) prior to surgery, unless there was disease progression or severe toxicity. The primary objective of this study was the safety of this therapeutic regimen, and the secondary objective was the tumor response. The safety of this regimen was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 and the efficacy of this treatment was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in this study. Participants completed an average of 5.56 neoadjuvant treatment cycles. The objective response rate (ORR) was 83.33%, and the disease control rate was 100%, respectively. The pCR was 55.6%. No patients discontinued therapy because of Adverse effects (AEs). Grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed in 5 cases (27.8%), with neutropenia and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib combined with TEC as neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity for locally advanced TNBC. Further investigation of this combination regimen is warranted.

Benmelstobart plus anlotinib in patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC after failure of EGFR TKIs therapy: a phase I/II study.

The effect of immune-based therapies on patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy remains unclear. The ALTER-L038 study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of a chemotherapy-free combination of benmelstobart, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody, and anlotinib, a small-molecule multi-target anti-angiogenic TKI, in EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC patients who progressed after EGFR TKI therapy. Patients were enrolled in a phase I/II study. In phase I (dose-escalation), patients received anlotinib (8, 10, 12 mg) plus benmelstobart (1200 mg). Recommended phase II dose, determined during phase I, was used in phase II dose-expansion cohort. Primary endpoints were maximum tolerable dose in phase I and progression-free survival (PFS) in phase II. At the data cutoff date (March 10, 2024), 55 patients were enrolled in phase II dose-expansion cohort. Median PFS of patients included in phase II cohort was 9.0 months, median overall survival was 28.9 months, objective response rate was 25.5%, disease control rate was 87.3%, and median duration of response was 19.8 months. Incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in study population was 25.5% (14/55), whereas grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 10.9% (6/55) of patients. Benmelstobart plus anlotinib showed promising anti-tumor efficacy with tolerable safety profile, supporting the value of further development of this convenient chemotherapy-free regimen for patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC who progressed after EGFR TKI therapy. Trial Registration: ChiCTR1900026273.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies plus GEMOX chemotherapy as non-first-line systemic therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy have shown significant antitumor activity as first-line therapy against biliary tract cancer. This study evaluated their efficacy and safety as non-first-line therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS: Patients with advanced GBC who received lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and GEMOX chemotherapy as a non-first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients with advanced GBC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 11.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-20.9) months, and the ORR was 36.1%. The median OS and PFS were 15.1 (95% CI: 3.2-26.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 4.9-7.2) months, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 75% and 61.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression. Additionally, patients with a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5.57 had a longer OS than those with an NLR ≥ 5.57. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with 61.1% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs, including myelosuppression (13.9%) and fatigue (13.3%), alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase levels (8.3%), and diarrhea (8.3%). No grade 5 AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX chemotherapy are effective and well-tolerated as a non-first-line therapy in advanced GBC. PD-L1 expression and baseline NLR may potentially predict treatment efficacy.

Effectiveness, safety, and biomarker analysis of lenvatinib plus toripalimab as chemo-free therapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are currently limited. Chemo-containing regimens are the mainstay treatments but associated with notable toxicity, poor tolerance, and reduced compliance, necessitating exploration of alternative therapies. Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors has shown substantial clinical activity in preliminary studies. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib plus toripalimab (a novel PD-1 antibody) as chemo-free therapy in advanced ICC. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive advanced ICC patients receiving lenvatinib plus toripalimab between February 2019 and December 2023. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Prognostic factors and exploratory analyses for genetic alternations were also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 25.9 months. Median OS and PFS were 11.3 (95% CI: 9.5-13.1) and 5.4 (95% CI: 3.8-7.0) months, respectively. ORR was 19.2% and DCR was 75.6%. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) was 50.0%, with no grade 5 AEs reported. Patients with normal baseline CA19-9 levels exhibited a higher ORR (p = 0.011), longer PFS (11.5 versus 4.6 months; HR 0.47; p=0.005), and OS (21.0 versus 9.7 months; HR 0.43; p=0.003). The presence of IDH1 mutations correlated with increased ORR (60.0% versus 8.9%, p=0.016). CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib plus toripalimab represents an effective and well-tolerated chemo-free therapeutic option for advanced ICC. Baseline CA19-9 levels and IDH1 mutations may serve as predictive treatment-related biomarkers.

Phase I/II study of nivolumab plus lenvatinib for advanced biliary tract cancer (JCOG1808/NCCH1817, SNIPE).

BACKGROUND: Although cisplatin plus gemcitabine and other combinations have improved the survival of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), high unmet medical needs remain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus lenvatinib in the second-line treatment for advanced BTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nivolumab (240 mg) was administered biweekly. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose of lenvatinib (20 mg or 14 mg). In phase II, the primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned sample size was 32 patients with a power of 80%, a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold ORR of 10%, and expected ORR of 30%. RESULTS: In phase I, the recommended dose of lenvatinib was determined to be 20 mg in six patients, with one dose-limiting toxicity (myocarditis). In phase II, we enrolled 26 patients. ORR, DCR, and median OS and PFS were 9.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 22.5%], 53.1% (95% CI 34.7% to 70.9%), and 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-4.1 months), respectively. No response was observed in patients with the usage of antibiotics. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (59.4%) and biliary tract infection (37.5%). Rash (28.1%) and hypothyroidism (21.9%) were observed as immune-mediated adverse events of any grade. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety in advanced BTC, but its efficacy in the second-line treatment was limited.

Estimated cost of VEGFR TKI associated adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receive one or more VEGFR TKI agents, alone or in combination with an immune-oncology (IO) agent or an mTOR inhibitor. To date, the cost of adverse events (AEs) common to VEGFR TKIs has not been quantified. This study estimated the potential impact of differences in VEGFR TKI AE profiles on treatment cost efficiency in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. METHODS: Patients with documented mRCC who were treated with VEGFR TKI therapies between Jan 2015 and Mar 2021 were identified using EMR. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify the first occurrence of each class effect AE. Patients were matched to 3rd party insurance claims, and costs associated to TKI AEs within 90 days of index event were captured. Average per patient AE cost data was calculated and applied to published incidence data to estimate regimen-specific AE total cost burden within a hypothetical commercial plan for mRCC patients undergoing treatment in the R/R setting. RESULTS: The highest total cost for AE management was attributed to lenvatinib and everolimus use at $13,303, followed closely by sunitinib at $13,092. Tivozanib treatment was associated with the lowest total cost of AE management at $7,523, driven by the relatively lower incidence of certain high-cost AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated costs of managing VEGFR TKI class-effect AEs were lowest with tivozanib, and highest with lenvatinib and everolimus, indicating potentially differential healthcare resource burden by TKI regimen. The use of tivozanib in the 3 L + mRCC setting suggests potential costs offsets when compared to other TKI regimens.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus Sorafenib versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus Lenvatinib for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted that TACE in conjunction with Lenvatinib (TACE-L) offers a promising adjunct therapy for advanced HCC patients, outperforming TACE plus Sorafenib (TACE-S). However, there has been a lack of research comparing these two regimens for intermediate HCC. AIMS: This study aims to address the research gap by evaluating the efficacy of TACE-L versus TACE-S in intermediate HCC patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of consecutive intermediate HCC patients who received either TACE-L or TACE-S from November 2018 to December 2022. Portal vein width was assessed using abdominal NMRI or Doppler ultrasonography, and inflammatory markers were derived from routine blood counts. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). RESULTS: The study included 117 patients, with 56 in the TACE-S group and 61 in the TACE-L group. The TACE-S group demonstrated superior OS (HR = 1.704, 95% CI: 1.012-2.870, p = 0.045) compared to the TACE-L group. No significant difference was observed in PFS (HR:1.512, 95% CI: 0.988-2.313, p = 0.057) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that male patients, those with cirrhosis, and those with more than four tumors had better OS and PFS in the TACE-S group than in the TACE-L group. Inflammatory markers were comparable between the groups. The TACE-S group experienced a higher incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPE) (14/56 [25%] vs. 5/61 [8.1%], p = 0.014) but a lower incidence of hypertension (3/56 [5.3%] vs. 11/61 [18%], p = 0.035) compared to the TACE-L group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with intermediate HCC, TACE-S was found to be more effective in terms of OS than TACE-L. No significant disparity was noted in PFS between the two treatment groups.

Anlotinib plus oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SALTER TRIAL): a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal overall survival (OS) after failed platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: The eligibility criteria of this phase II clinical trial included patients with measurable disease, age of 18 to 75 years, a confirmed diagnosis of disease progression or recurrence after prior platinum-based chemotherapy with a pathologically proven diagnosis of SCLC. Patients were treated with anlotinib at a dosage of 12 mg once daily (QD) and S-1 at 60 mg twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval. After six cycles of the above treatment, patients continued the maintenance therapy using S-1 monotherapy at 60 mg/ BID for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval until disease progression. RESULTS: From March 2019 to June 2020, a total of 71 patients were initially assessed for eligibility in this study. Out of these, 52 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and 48 patients received at least two doses of the study drug. The median follow-up time was 25.1 months. The ORR was seen in 21 patients (43.8%). The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.5 months), and the median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6-7.3 months). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (16.7%), anemia (14.6%), neutropenia (14.6%), and hypertension (10.4%). No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of anlotinib with oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 demonstrated notable activity in relapsed or refractory SCLC, showing a favorable ORR and an acceptable, manageable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03823118) on 3 January 2019.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors versus transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Background: Locoregional treatment combined with systemic therapy is expected to play a synergistic anticancer role. We conducted this systemic meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib with or without programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (TLP group) compared with TACE + lenvatinib (TL group) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods: From the inception date to April 2024, the data from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials. gov were used for meta-analysis. All clinical outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure the pooled effect. Results: This study included 10 retrospective cohort studies, including 1128 patients. The OS (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.43-0.60, P < 0.05), PFS (HR=0.52; 95% CI: 0.45-0.61, P < 0.05), ORR (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.37-1.83; P < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20-1.43; P < 0.05) were significantly higher in TLP group than in the TL group. The incidence of AEs was acceptable. Prognostic factor analysis identified that ECOG PS (1/0), Child-Pugh class (B/A), BCLC stage (C/B) and main portal vein invasion (yes/no) were independent prognostic factors for OS. BCLC stage (C/B) and main portal vein invasion (yes/no) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusion: The TLP group had better efficacy for uHCC than that of the TL group, with acceptable safety. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42023420093).

Sintilimab combined with anlotinib and chemotherapy as second-line or later therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a phase II clinical trial.

Treatment options for patients with relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining anlotinib and sintilimab plus chemotherapy as a second line or later therapy for ES-SCLC patients. This is a phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR2100049390) conducting at Shandong Cancer Hospital. Patients with ES-SCLC and received at least one prior systemic treatment were enrolled. The trial design involved a combination therapy (sintilimab, anlotinib, and nab-paclitaxel) administered over six 21-day cycles, followed by maintenance sintilimab therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Circulating tumor DNA sequencing was employed for exploratory analysis. From July 2021 to April 2023, 25 eligible patients were enrolled. The confirmed ORR was 60% (95% CI: 38.7-78.9%) and the DCR was 76% (95% CI: 54.9-90.6%). The mPFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.7), and the 6-month PFS rate was 49.2%. The mOS was 13.4 months (95% CI: 11.8-NR), with a 12-month survival rate of 62.2%. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 80% of patients, with the most common being fatigue (40%) and nausea (32%). TRAEs of Grade 3 or higher were reported in 12% of patients. ctDNA analysis indicated that low on-treatment blood tumor mutation burden was associated with longer PFS and OS and a potential role of KMT2D mutation in treatment resistance. This combination therapy shows promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile as a second-line or later treatment for ES-SCLC, with genomic insights providing potential biomarkers for treatment response.

The impact of lenvatinib on sarcopenia in patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Lenvatinib is a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TKI are suspected of exacerbating muscle loss in patients with cancer. In this study, we analyze the role of muscle loss in patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib. This is a retrospective analysis of a real-life cohort of 25 patients with advanced HCC who were treated with lenvatinib from 2018 to March 2021 in Germany. Patients were stratified for loss of skeletal muscle area during the first three months of lenvatinib therapy. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed for all patients, especially regarding loss of muscle before and during the first three months of therapy with lenvatinib. Three months after beginning of therapy with lenvatinib, a significant reduction of muscle mass was observed in 60% of patients (p = 0.035). Despite increase of loss of skeletal muscle, patients benefitted from lenvatinib in our cohort of patients in terms of OS and PFS and did not experience increased toxicity. Furthermore, muscle loss was not a negative predictor of survival in the univariate analysis (p = 0.675). Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma experience muscle loss with lenvatinib therapy. However, despite progressive muscle loss, patients benefit from a therapy with lenvatinib in terms of OS and PFS without increased toxicity. However, assessment and prophylaxis of skeletal muscle status should be recommended during a therapy with lenvatinib.

Efficacy and safety of bosutinib in previously treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: final results from the BYOND trial.

This final analysis from the phase 4 BYOND trial reports outcomes with bosutinib in patients with previously treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); 163 patients with CML resistant/intolerant to previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors received bosutinib (starting dose: 500 mg QD). At study completion (median follow-up, 47.8 months), 48.1% (n = 75/156) of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML were still receiving treatment. Among evaluable patients, 71.8% (95% CI, 63.9-78.9) and 59.7% (95% CI, 51.4-67.7) attained or maintained major molecular response (MMR) and molecular response (MR)4, respectively, at any time on treatment. The majority of patients achieved a deeper molecular response relative to baseline while on bosutinib. Kaplan-Meier probabilities (95% CI) of maintaining MMR and MR4 at 36 months were 87.2% (78.0-92.7) and 80.7% (69.4-88.1), respectively. At 48 months, the Kaplan-Meier overall survival rate was 88.3% (95% CI, 81.8-92.6); there were 17 deaths, including 2 that were considered CML related. Long-term adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety profile of bosutinib, and no new safety issues were identified. The management of AEs through dose reduction maintained efficacy while improving tolerability. These results support the use of bosutinib in patients with previously treated CML.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02228382.

A lower initial dose of bosutinib for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant and/or intolerant to prior therapy: a single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 trial (BOGI trial).

Although bosutinib is generally safe and effective, drug-related toxicities (DRTs) such as diarrhea or increased transaminase levels often lead to treatment discontinuation. To clarify whether a lower initial dose of bosutinib (i.e., starting at 200 mg) would reduce rates of discontinuation due to DRTs, we conducted a phase 2 study of BOsutinib Gradual Increase (BOGI trial, UMIN 000032282) as a second/third-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Between February 4, 2019 and May 24, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled. The rate of bosutinib discontinuation at 12 months was 25.7% vs. 35.9% in a historical control study (Japanese phase 1/2 study) (p = 0.102). The rate of bosutinib discontinuation due to DRTs was significantly lower, at 11.4% vs. 28.2% (p = 0.015). The incidence of grade 3/4 transaminase elevation was 20% vs. 29% (p = 0.427), while the incidence of diarrhea was 3% vs. 25% (p = 0.009). The median dose intensity of bosutinib was higher (391.7 mg/day vs. 353.9 mg/day). Pharmacokinetic analysis of bosutinib showed that patients who achieved a major molecular response tended to have high trough concentrations. Thus, a low initial dose of bosutinib followed by dose escalation reduced discontinuation due to severe DRTs while maintaining high dose intensity and efficacy.

Patterns in use and tolerance of adjuvant neratinib in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: One year of neratinib therapy is known to derive a significant invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) benefit in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR +), HER2 + , node-positive breast cancer after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy. Limitations to neratinib use include significant gastrointestinal side effects, which often result in treatment discontinuation. In this study, we aimed to identify clinicopathologic features associated with adjuvant neratinib use and factors impacting treatment completion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with early-stage HR + HER2 + breast cancer who were prescribed neratinib from 2017 to 2023 at our institution. We used the electronic medical record to extract information on patient characteristics, clinical features, and treatment information. Patients were identified as high risk based on definitions adapted from the standard high-risk definition in HR + HER2- breast cancer combined with studies correlating high Ki67 or high tumor grade with lower recurrence-free survival. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sided T-tests and chi-square tests. RESULTS: We identified 62 eligible patients of whom 55% completed 1 year of neratinib and 45% did not. Sixty percent (N = 37) of patients offered neratinib were considered high risk at diagnosis. The most common reason for neratinib discontinuation was inability to tolerate side effects (54%) followed by pill burden (18%). The most common side effect experienced by patients was diarrhea despite anti-diarrheal prophylaxis (56%), followed by rash (8%). Patients who received an up-titration of neratinib were more likely to complete the full course of neratinib when compared to those who did not (76% vs. 40.5% p = 0.013). The median starting dose of those who completed neratinib treatment was 140 vs. 240 mg in those who did not (p = 0.016). Neither group experienced a statistically significant greater likelihood of treatment holds or dose reductions. In terms of outcomes, 10 patients had progression of disease of whom 7 did not complete neratinib treatment (p = 0.169). Interestingly, those 7 patients developed metastatic disease and 57% (N = 4) had central nervous system metastases. CONCLUSION: Patients are more likely to complete 1 year of adjuvant neratinib with dose up-titration. Dose reductions and interruptions did not affect neratinib adherence in our patient population. Seven patients (11%) in our study developed metastatic disease, all of whom did not complete adjuvant neratinib treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in EGFR-Positive Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Compared with Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

There are no standard third-line or beyond treatments for patients with driver mutation-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Anlotinib was approved as a third-line multitarget drug in China in 2018. Limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with chemotherapy. To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib compared with traditional chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced LUAD. We conducted a retrospective study of 83 EGFR mutation-positive patients with advanced LUAD between 2011 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, whereas the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were the secondary endpoints. Anlotinib-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety of anlotinib. 39 patients with LUAD received anlotinib and 44 patients with LUAD received chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. Patients treated with anlotinib exhibited longer PFS (11.2 vs 4.5 months, P < .01) and OS (18.8 vs 15.8 months, P < .05) than patients treated with chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in ORR (7.9% vs 20.5%, P = .129) or DCR (100% vs 93.2%, P = .120) between the two groups. Anlotinib-related AEs grading 3-4 level were observed in 2 (5.1%) patients, no anlotinib-related death was recorded. Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS showed that brain metastases and age < 30 years at diagnosis had negative effects on clinical outcomes. Anlotinib is effective and safe in patients with EGFR-positive advanced LUAD. Patients without brain metastases had better clinical outcomes.

Hepatic arterial infusion of GEMOX plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy (GEM-SYS) in combination with lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). METHODS: From November 2019 to December 2022, 21 large uICC patients who underwent GEMOX-HAIC (Day 1) and GEM-SYS (Day 8) (3w/cycle) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor were retrospectively enrolled. Local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. AEs were evaluated by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 16.0 months (range 5-43.5 months), 17 patients had died. The median OS was 19.5 months (range 9-43.5 months), and the median PFS was 6.0 months (range 2.5-38.5 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 71.4 %, 42.9 %, and 19.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 33.3 %, 19.0 %, and 9.5 %, respectively. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 0 (0 %), 11 (52.3 %), 5 (23.8 %), and 5 (23.8 %) patients, respectively. The disease control rate and objective response rate were 76.1 % and 52.3 %, respectively. None of the enrolled patients experienced grade 5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS: GEMOX-HAIC plus GEM-SYS in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor was effective and well tolerated for patients with large uICC.

Efficacy and safety of a novel TKI (anlotinib) for the treatment of advanced digestive system neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib targeted therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced digestive system neoplasms (DSNs). Methods: Clinical trials were extracted from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and the Wanfang database up to October 2023. Outcome measures, including therapeutic efficacy, quality of life (QOL) and adverse events, were extracted and evaluated. Results: Twenty trials, including 1,613 advanced DSNs patients, were included. The results indicated that, compared with conventional treatment alone, the combination of anlotinib targeted therapy with conventional treatment significantly improved the patients' 6-months overall survival (OS, OR=1.76, CI=1.53 to 2.02, P<0.00001), overall response (ORR, OR=1.76, CI=1.53 to 2.02, P<0.00001) and disease control rate (DCR, OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.25 to 1.84, P<0.0001). Moreover, the group that received the combined therapy had higher rates of hypertension (P<0.00001), proteinuria (P<0.00001), fatigue (P<0.00001), diarrhea (P<0.00001), hypertriglyceridemia (P=0.02), alanine aminotransfease (ALT)increased (P=0.004), aspartate transaminase (AST) increased (P=0.006), anorexia (P<0.00001), weight loss (P=0.002), abdominal pain (P=0.0006), hypothyroidism (P=0.02), prolonged QT interval (P=0.04). Analyses of other adverse events, such as gastrointestinal reaction, leukopenia, and neutropenia, did not reveal significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusion: The combination of anlotinib targeted therapy and conventional treatment is more effective for DSNs treatment than conventional treatment alone. However, this combined treatment could lead to greater rates of hypertension, albuminuria and hand-foot syndrome. Therefore, the benefits and risks should be considered before treatment.