The Price of Courage: The Life and Legacy of Dr LaSalle D. Leffall Jr.

This historical retrospective details the life and legacy of Dr LaSalle D. Leffall Jr, a leader in the field of surgical oncology, passionate surgical educator, and indelible mentor. His courage, against the backdrop of the many obstacles presented by American racism, paved the way for the inclusion of multiple generations of women and minority surgeons leaving a lasting impact on the history of American surgery.

How can pediatric surgeons address racism and become actively anti-racist?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This is an article submitted on behalf of the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons. We assert that Pediatric Surgeons must work to dismantle systemic racism. Pediatric Surgeons have expertise in both common and rare surgical diseases affecting patients ranging from premature neonates to adolescents. Thus, our professional obligation is to transform our health and social systems to prevent the harms of racism to our patients. METHODS: Specific to the Canadian context, we describe a brief history, the ongoing impact on individuals and communities, and the harmful effect on the surgical community and trainees. Finally, we developed a series of practical recommendations to help surgeons become actively anti-racist. RESULTS: Four primary recommendations are made: (1) Increasing and supporting anti-racism education; (2) Changing individual behaviours to combat racism; (3) Developing strategies for organizational change; and (4) Committing to diversity in leadership. CONCLUSION: As surgeons, we are actors of change, and we can take meaningful steps to combat racism in our health systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Antiracist symptom science: A call to action and path forward.

Nurse scientists recognize the experience of racism as a driving force behind health. However, symptom science, a pillar of nursing, has rarely considered contributions of racism. Our objective is to describe findings within symptom science research related to racial disparities and/or experiences of racism and to promote antiracist symptom science within nursing research. In this manuscript, we use an antiracist lens to review a predominant symptom science theory and literature in three areas of symptom science research-oncology, mental health, and perinatal health. Finally, we make recommendations for increasing antiracist research in symptom science by altering (a) research questions, (b) recruitment methods, (c) study design, (d) data analysis, and (e) dissemination of findings. Traditionally, symptom science focuses on individual level factors rather than broader contexts driving symptom experience and management. We urge symptom science researchers to embrace antiracism by designing research with the specific intent of dismantling racism at multiple levels.

An Organizational Approach to Addressing Racism in Orthopaedic Surgery: AOA Critical Issues Symposium.

ABSTRACT: This article highlights the key topics that were presented at a symposium of the American Orthopaedic Association in May 2021, with the primary objectives of acknowledging the existence of systemic racism within the field of orthopaedic surgery, developing a plan for combating racism before it manifests within orthopaedic departments and practices, and understanding the benefit of pipeline programs in diversifying the orthopaedic surgeon workforce. When the word racism is mentioned among a group of orthopaedic surgeons, it may have the immediate effect of stifling honest conversations. Therefore, the crippling effects of racism within orthopaedic surgery are not addressed, and there are downstream effects that influence patient care by perpetuating disparities in health care. If orthopaedic departments want to fix the lack of diversity within the specialty, the magnitude of the problem must first be measured. Fortunately, through the efforts of the J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society, data sets are being created that better measure the diversity of individual orthopaedic residency programs. In addition to hiring diverse faculty, orthopaedic departments and practices should focus on the mentorship, sponsorship, retention, and promotion of these faculty. Finally, pipeline programs such as Nth Dimensions have a proven track record for improving the diversity of the orthopaedic workforce and can serve as the primary mechanism employed by departments and practices in making their orthopaedic surgeon workforce look more like the demographics of the United States.

Patient activation reduces effects of implicit bias on doctor-patient interactions.

Disparities between Black and White Americans persist in medical treatment and health outcomes. One reason is that physicians sometimes hold implicit racial biases that favor White (over Black) patients. Thus, disrupting the effects of physicians' implicit bias is one route to promoting equitable health outcomes. In the present research, we tested a potential mechanism to short-circuit the effects of doctors' implicit bias: patient activation, i.e., having patients ask questions and advocate for themselves. Specifically, we trained Black and White standardized patients (SPs) to be "activated" or "typical" during appointments with unsuspecting oncologists and primary care physicians in which SPs claimed to have stage IV lung cancer. Supporting the idea that patient activation can promote equitable doctor-patient interactions, results showed that physicians' implicit racial bias (as measured by an implicit association test) predicted racially biased interpersonal treatment among typical SPs (but not among activated SPs) across SP ratings of interaction quality and ratings from independent coders who read the interaction transcripts. This research supports prior work showing that implicit attitudes can undermine interpersonal treatment in medical settings and provides a strategy for ensuring equitable doctor-patient interactions.

The REPAIR Project: A Prospectus for Change Toward Racial Justice in Medical Education and Health Sciences Research: REPAIR Project Steering Committee.

Amidst ongoing efforts to address racial injustice, U.S. medical institutions are grappling with the structural roots of anti-Black racism. The REPAIR (REParations and Anti-Institutional Racism) Project is a 3-year strategic initiative at the University of California, San Francisco aiming to address anti-Black racism and augment the presence and voices of people of color in science, medicine, and health care. The REPAIR Project was designed in response to an unmet need for critical dialogue, cross-disciplinary research, and curriculum development addressing structural racism. It offers a framework for thinking and acting to achieve repair in relation to racial injustice and is anchored by 3 concepts-reparations, abolition, and decolonization-which have been deployed as annual themes in academic years 2020-2021, 2021-2022, and 2022-2023, respectively. The theme of medical reparations builds on the longstanding call for slavery reparations and the paying of debts owed to Black Americans for the harms of slavery. The REPAIR Project focuses on the specific debts owed to Black Americans for racial harm in health care settings. The theme of medical abolition examines the intersections of incarceration, policing, and surveillance in health care and the role of clinicians in furthering or stopping oppressive practices that bind patterns of Black incarceration to health and health care. The theme of decolonizing the health sciences targets "othering" practices entrenched in scientific methodologies that have arisen from colonial-era beliefs and practices around imperialism, including how the colonial-era concept of race contributes to ongoing racial harm. In this article, the authors describe the REPAIR Project, preliminary outcomes from its first year, and potential future lines of inquiry for medical educators and health sciences researchers. The authors argue that the full damage from slavery and its legacies cannot be undone, but everyone can work in new ways that reduce or eliminate harm.

Structural Racism and Cancer: Calls to Action for Cancer Researchers to Address Racial/Ethnic Cancer Inequity in the United States.

As leaders with the American Society of Preventive Oncology (ASPO) Cancer Health Disparities Special Interest Group, we describe the role of structural racism in perpetuating cancer health inequity historically, and potential implications of COVID-19 in exacerbating the effects of structural racism on patients with cancer seeking screening, diagnostic care, treatment, and survivorship support. As a strategy to reduce cancer inequities in the United States, we provide the following calls to action for cancer researchers to help alleviate the burden of structural racism: (i) identify and name structural racism while describing its operation within all aspects of scientific research; (ii) comprehensively integrate discussions on structural racism into teaching, mentoring, and service activities; and (iii) understand and support community actions to address structural racism.

Place Is Power: Investing in Communities as a Systemic Leverage Point to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities by Race.

Racial disparities in breast cancer present a vexing and complex challenge for public health. A diverse array of factors contributes to disparities in breast cancer incidence and outcomes, and, thus far, efforts to improve racial equity have yielded mixed results. Systems theory offers a model that is well-suited to addressing complex issues. In particular, the concept of a systemic leverage point offers a clue that may assist researchers, policymakers, and interventionists in formulating innovative and comprehensive approaches to eliminating racial disparities in breast cancer. Naming systemic racism as a fundamental cause of disparities, we use systems theory to identify residential segregation as a key leverage point and a driver of racial inequities across the social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. We call on researchers, policymakers, and interventionists to use a systems-informed, community-based participatory approach, aimed at harnessing the power of place, to engage directly with community stakeholders in coordinating efforts to prevent breast cancer, and work toward eliminating disparities in communities of color.