Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With STEMI vs NSTEMI.

BACKGROUND: Patients who sustain an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), remain at high risk for heart failure (HF), coronary events, and death. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to significantly decrease the risk for cardiovascular events in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine whether angiotensin-receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan, compared with ramipril, has impact on reducing cardiovascular events according to the type of AMI. METHODS: The PARADISE-MI (Prospective ARNI versus ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction) trial enrolled patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and/or pulmonary congestion and at least 1 risk-enhancing factor. Patients were randomized to either sacubitril/valsartan or ramipril. The primary endpoint was death from cardiovascular causes or incident HF. In this prespecified analysis, we stratified patients according to AMI type. RESULTS: Of 5,661 enrolled patients, 4,291 (75.8%) had STEMI. These patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors than NSTEMI patients. After adjustment for potential confounders, the risk for the primary outcome was marginally higher in NSTEMI vs STEMI patients (adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00-1.41), with borderline statistical significance (P = 0.05). The primary composite outcome occurred at similar rates in patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan vs ramipril in STEMI (10% vs 12%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.73-1.04; P = 0.13) and NSTEMI patients (17% vs 17%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.75-1.25; P = 0.80; P interaction = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ramipril, sacubitril/valsartan did not significantly decrease the risk for cardiovascular death and HF in patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, irrespective of the type of AMI. (Prospective ARNI vs ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI; NCT02924727).

Protective Effect of Ramipril Against Oxidant and Proinflammatory Cytokine Damage Induced by Ischemia-Reperfusion in Ovarian Tissue in Rats.

BACKGROUND: It is known that the increase in oxidants and proinflammatory cytokines, as well as the decrease in antioxidants, play a role in ovarian ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of ramipril have been studied in various diseases. This study aims to investigate the effect of ramipril on I/R-induced ovarian damage in rats. METHODS: Rats were divided into healthy (HG), sham (SG), ovary I/R (OIR), and ramipril + ovary I/R (ROIR) groups (n = 6/each group). One hour before the surgical procedures, ROIR was given 2 mg/kg ramipril. The lower abdomen of the SG, OIR, and ROIR was surgically opened. Right ovarian tissues of OIR and ROIR were subjected to 2 hours of ischemia and 6 hours of reperfusion. Then, all animals were euthanized, and their right ovaries were removed. Ovarian tissues were examined for oxidants (malondialdehyde), antioxidants (total glutathione, superoxide dismutase, and catalase), and proinflammatory cytokines (nuclear factor kappa-B, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin 1 beta, and interleukin-6) analysis was performed. Tissues were examined histopathologically. RESULTS: The ovarian tissue of the OIR, which underwent the I/R procedure, exhibited a significant increase in oxidant and proinflammatory cytokine levels, along with a decrease in antioxidant levels (P < .001). Ramipril suppressed the I/R-induced increase in oxidants and pro-inflammatory cytokines and the decrease in antioxidants (P < .001). Ramipril also attenuated I/R-induced histopathological damage in ovarian tissue (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Ramipril treatment may be a treatment strategy to protect ovarian tissue against oxidative and inflammatory damage of I/R.

Evaluation of the efficacy of hydro-alcoholic extract of Evolvulus alsinoides L. for the treatment of primary hypertension - A randomized controlled trial.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Evolvulus alsinoides L. (Sankhaholi) has been traditionally used in Unani (Greco-Arabic) medicine to treat diverse cardiovascular disorders. Notably, preclinical and clinical investigations have substantiated its remarkable potential as an antihypertensive agent. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hydroalcoholic extract of Evolvulus alsinoides L. and ramipril in treating hypertension using a higher dose of the test drug within the recommended limit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label randomized controlled trial, 57 participants (29 in the test group, 28 in the control group) completed the 42-day study. The test group received 630 mg of dried hydro-alcoholic extract of Evolvulus alsinoides L. in capsule form orally once daily, while the control group received 5 mg of Ramipril orally once daily. Participants in both groups were advised to adhere to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) eating plan in terms of diet and lifestyle adjustments recommended by JNC-8. The primary outcome measures were changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as changes in plasma levels of hsCRP and IL6. Secondary outcome measures included changes in symptoms such as palpitations, giddiness, headaches, fatigue and shortness of breath. Headaches, palpitations, and giddiness were assessed using a customized Visual Analog Scale (VAS) graded as "none," "mild," "moderate," and "severe". Fatigue was assessed on a binary scale as either absent or present, and dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale for breathlessness. Both primary and secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline and each follow-up visit (2nd week, 4th week, and 6th week) until the completion of the trial. RESULTS: At the end of the trial, the mean differences for the primary outcomes were as follows:SBP:-1.8895%CI:-4.82,1.05,p=0.203,d=0.33, DBP: -2.8395%CI:-4.67,-0.10,p=0.003,d=0.8, hsCRP: -1.4095%CI:-2.80,-0.003,p=0.49,d=0.53, and IL6: -88.6795%CI:-148.90,-28.43,p=0.005,d=0.78. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preliminary results, it can be inferred that the hydro-alcoholic extract of Evolvulus alsinoides L. exhibits significant antihypertensive potential, comparable to that of ramipril. Furthermore, it appears that Evolvulus alsinoides L. may be more effective than ramipril in reducing the biochemical markers of inflammation associated with primary hypertension. However, additional research is required to validate these findings.

Effect of pharmacological heart failure drugs and gene therapy on Danon's cardiomyopathy.

Danon disease is a rare X-linked genetic disease resulting from LAMP2 mutations leading to defective lysosomal function. Heart failure is the main causes of morbidity and mortality. Mice with an LAMP2-exon-6-deletion (L2Δ6), develop cardiac hypertrophy followed by dilated cardiomyopathy, in association with accumulation of autophagosomes, fibrosis and oxidative stress. We investigated the effect of drugs used to treat heart failure and of LAMP2 gene therapy on the phenotype, molecular markers and ROS in LAMP2 cardiomyopathy. L2Δ6 mice were treated with Angiotensin II, Ramipril, Metoprolol or Spironolactone. Gene therapy was delivered by IP injection of Adeno-associated-virus (AAV9) -LAMP2 vector to neonates ("AAVLAMP2-Prevention"), or at 15 weeks of age ("AAVLAMP2-Treatment"). Angiotensin II markedly aggravated the cardiac phenotype. Ramipril and Spironolactone were effective in attenuating left ventricular hypertrophy and preserving the systolic function. Cardiac protection was associated with decreased autophagosome accumulation, reduced fibrosis and oxidative stress. Gene therapy effectively attenuated autophagosome accumulation and ROS in L2Δ6 hearts, lowering troponin release to nearly normal levels. AAVLAMP2-Prevention protected against systolic dysfunction and decreased hypertrophy. AAVLAMP2-Treatment prevented ventricular dilatation and dysfunction but had no effect on wall thickness. We conclude that RAAS inhibitors are highly effective against cardiomyopathy progression in an experimental mouse model of Danon's and shall be considered in human patients for this purpose until novel therapies become clinically available.

Cost-effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill versus separate monocomponents in cardiovascular secondary prevention in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Despite advances in treatment, cardiovascular disease is the second leading cause of death in Spain. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill strategy (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg, atorvastatin 20/40 mg, ramipril 2.5/5/10 mg) compared with the same separate monocomponents for the secondary prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events in adults in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov cost-utility model was adapted considering 4 health states (stable, subsequent major adverse cardiovascular event, subsequent ischemic stroke and death) and the SMART risk equation over a lifetime horizon from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System. The CNIC-Polypill strategy was compared with monocomponents in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 secondary prevention patients. Effectiveness, epidemiological, cost and utilities data were obtained from the NEPTUNO study, official databases and literature. Outcomes were costs (in 2021 euros) per life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted LY (QALY) gained. A 3% discount rate was applied. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the model. RESULTS: The CNIC-Polypill strategy in secondary prevention results in more LY (13.22) and QALY (11.64) gains at a lower cost than monocomponents. The CNIC-Polypill is dominant and saves є280.68 per patient compared with monocomponents. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 82.4% of the simulations are below the threshold of є25,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: The CNIC-Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention is cost-effective compared with the same separate monocomponents, resulting in a cost-saving strategy to the Spanish National Healthcare System.

In silico and in vitro screening for carcinogenic potential of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and their degradation impurities.

According to some clinical observations, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) may be associated with an increased risk of cancer. The aim of the present study was to screen for the potential carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and genotoxicity of these drugs using in silico methodology. Delapril, enalapril, imidapril, lisinopril, moexipril, perindopril, ramipril, trandolapril, spirapril were thereby analyzed. In parallel, the corresponding degradation impurities, the diketopiperazine (DKP) derivatives, were also investigated. (Q)SAR computer software (VEGA-GUI and Lazar), available in the public domain, was employed. The obtained predictions suggested that none of the compounds tested (from the group of ACE-Is and DKPs) was mutagenic. Moreover, none of the ACE-Is was carcinogenic. The reliability of these predictions was high to moderate. In contrast, in the DKP group, ramipril-DKP and trandolapril-DKP were found to be potentially carcinogenic, but the reliability of this prediction was low. As for the genotoxicity screening, all compounds tested (ACE-I and DKP) were predicted to be active and genotoxic, with moexipril, ramipril, spirapril, and all DKP derivatives within the highest risk group. They were prioritized for experimental verification studies to confirm or exclude their toxic activity. On the other hand, the lowest risk of carcinogenicity was assigned to imidapril and its DKP. Then, a follow-up in vitro micronucleus assay for ramipril was performed. It showed that this drug was genotoxic via aneugenic activity, but only at concentrations exceeding real-life levels. At concentrations found in human blood after standard dose, ramipril was not genotoxic in vitro. Therefore, ramipril was considered safe for human use with a standard dosing regimen. The other compounds of concern (spirapril, moexipril and all DKP derivatives) should be subjected to analogous in vitro studies. We also concluded that the adopted in silico software was applicable for ACE-I toxicity prediction.

Supplementation of antihypertensive drug regimen with vitamin E ameliorates alterations of primary haemodynamic parameters and total antioxidant capacity in ovariectomised rats.

OBJECTIVES: Ovariectomy induces heightened response to vasoconstrictors, alters vasorelaxation and consequently causes hypertension due to increased oxidative stress in rats. METHODS: This study evaluated the ameliorative effects of ramipril and vitamin E, on primary haemodynamic parameters and cardiac antioxidant defence status, in ovariectomised rats using 64 adult female rats of the Wistar strain randomly divided as follows: Control (sham); Ovariectomised (OVX); OVX plus Ramipril; OVX plus vitamin E; and OVX plus Ramipril plus vitamin E. RESULTS: The plasma level of oestrogen was significantly lower (p<0.05), in the ovariectomised rats compared with the sham. The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure of ovariectomised rats increased significantly (p<0.05), but the alteration was significantly reduced by the administration of ramipril alone or in combination with vitamin E. Significant decrease (p<0.05) was observed in the serum level of nitric oxide in OVX group compared with Sham. Also, analysed markers of oxidative stress: Malondialdehyde (MDA) contents and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) generated decreased significantly (p<0.05), but systemic antioxidants: reduced glutathione (GSH) contents; glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities increased significantly (p<0.05) in the ovariectomised rats treated with ramipril and vitamin E compared with untreated ovariectomised rats. The study concludes that alteration, in the primary haemodynamic parameters, associated with ovariectomy in rats is potently ameliorated by co-administration of the antihypertensive drug ramipril and vitamin E. CONCLUSIONS: The supplementation of antihypertensive regimen with antioxidants such as vitamin E in the treatment of hypertension is therefore justifiable especially in ovariectomised or hypogonadal patients.

The Effects of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition on Major Coronary Events in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the PARADISE-MI Trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients who survive an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decrease the risk of subsequent major cardiovascular events. Whether angiotensin-receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan reduce major coronary events more effectively than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in high-risk patients with recent AMI remains unknown. We aimed to compare the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on coronary outcomes in patients with AMI. METHODS: We conducted a prespecified analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs ACE Inhibitors Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI), which compared sacubitril/valsartan (97/103 mg twice daily) with ramipril (5 mg twice daily) for reducing heart failure events after myocardial infarction in 5661 patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, or both. In the present analysis, the prespecified composite coronary outcome was the first occurrence of death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina, or postrandomization coronary revascularization. RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned at a median of 4.4 [3.0-5.8] days after index AMI (ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction 76%, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction 24%), by which time 89% of patients had undergone coronary reperfusion. Compared with ramipril, sacubitril/valsartan decreased the risk of coronary outcomes (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.74-0.99], P=0.04) over a median follow-up of 22 months. Rates of the components of the composite outcomes were lower in patients on sacubitril/valsartan but were not individually significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of an AMI with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and pulmonary congestion, sacubitril/valsartan-compared with ramipril-reduced the risk of a prespecified major coronary composite outcome. Dedicated studies are necessary to confirm this finding and elucidate its mechanism. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02924727.

Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Ramipril on Cardiac Structure and Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction: The PARADISE-MI Echocardiographic Substudy.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors attenuate left ventricular (LV) enlargement after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Preclinical data suggest similar benefits with combined angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition, but human data are conflicting. The PARADISE-MI Echo Study (Prospective ARNI Versus ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After Myocardial Infarction) tested the effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared with ramipril on LV function and adverse remodeling after high risk-AMI. METHODS: In a prespecified substudy, 544 PARADISE-MI participants were enrolled in the Echo Study to undergo protocol echocardiography at randomization and after 8 months. Patients were randomized within 0.5 to 7 days of presentation with their index AMI to receive a target dose of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg or ramipril 5 mg twice daily. Echocardiographic measures were performed at a core laboratory by investigators blinded to treatment assignment. The effect of treatment on change in echo measures was assessed with ANCOVA with adjustment for baseline value and enrollment region. The primary end points were change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial volume (LAV), and prespecified secondary end points included changes in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. RESULTS: Mean age was 64±12 years; 26% were women; mean LVEF was 42±12%; and LAV was 49±17 mL. Of 544 enrolled patients, 457 (84%) had a follow-up echo at 8 months (228 taking sacubitril/valsartan, 229 taking ramipril). There was no significant difference in change in LVEF (P=0.79) or LAV (P =0.62) by treatment group. Patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated less increase in LV end-diastolic volume (P=0.025) and greater decline in LV mass index (P=0.037), increase in tissue Doppler e'lat (P=0.005), decrease in E/e'lat (P=0.045), and decrease in tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity (P=0.024) than patients randomized to ramipril. These differences remained significant after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics. Baseline LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, LV mass index, LAV, and Doppler-based diastolic indices were associated with risk of cardiovascular death or incident heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan compared with ramipril after AMI did not result in changes in LVEF or LAV at 8 months. Patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan had less LV enlargement and greater improvement in filling pressure. Measures of LV size, systolic function, and diastolic properties were predictive of cardiovascular death and incident heart failure after AMI in this contemporary, well-treated cohort. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02924727.

Differential effects of RYGB surgery and best medical treatment for obesity-diabetes on intestinal and islet adaptations in obese-diabetic ZDSD rats.

Modification of gut-islet secretions after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYBG) surgery contributes to its metabolic and anti-diabetic benefits. However, there is limited knowledge on tissue-specific hormone distribution post-RYGB surgery and how this compares with best medical treatment (BMT). In the present study, pancreatic and ileal tissues were excised from male Zucker-Diabetic Sprague Dawley (ZDSD) rats 8-weeks after RYGB, BMT (daily oral dosing with metformin 300mg/kg, fenofibrate 100mg/kg, ramipril 1mg/kg, rosuvastatin 10mg/kg and subcutaneous liraglutide 0.2mg/kg) or sham operation (laparotomy). Insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, PYY, GLP-1 and GIP expression patterns were assessed using immunocytochemistry and analyzed using ImageJ. After RYGB and BMT, body weight and plasma glucose were decreased. Intestinal morphometry was unaltered by RYGB, but crypt depth was decreased by BMT. Intestinal PYY cells were increased by both interventions. GLP-1- and GIP-cell counts were unchanged by RYGB but BMT increased ileal GLP-1-cells and decreased those expressing GIP. The intestinal contents of PYY and GLP-1 were significantly enhanced by RYGB, whereas BMT decreased ileal GLP-1. No changes of islet and beta-cell area or proliferation were observed, but the extent of beta-cell apoptosis and islet integrity calculated using circularity index were improved by both treatments. Significantly decreased islet alpha-cell areas were observed in both groups, while beta- and PYY-cell areas were unchanged. RYGB also induced a decrease in islet delta-cell area. PYY and GLP-1 colocalization with glucagon in islets was significantly decreased in both groups, while co-staining of PYY with glucagon was decreased and that with somatostatin increased. These data characterize significant cellular islet and intestinal adaptations following RYGB and BMT associated with amelioration of obesity-diabetes in ZDSD rats. The differential responses observed and particularly those within islets, may provide important clues to the unique ability of RYGB to cause diabetes remission.

Sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril for patients with acute myocardial infarction: win-ratio analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial.

AIM: The win ratio can incorporate different types of outcomes and enhance statistical power, making it a useful method for analysing composite outcomes in cardiovascular trials. The application of this approach to the PARADISE-MI trial provides an additional perspective into understanding the effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial, which randomly assigned patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary congestion, or both to receive either sacubitril/valsartan (97 mg of sacubitril and 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or ramipril (5 mg twice daily) in addition to guideline-recommended therapy. The principal composite outcome was analysed in the hierarchical order of death due to cardiovascular causes, first hospitalization for heart failure, and first outpatient episode of symptomatic heart failure. We included events confirmed by the clinical events classification (CEC) committee as well as events identified by investigators that did not meet study definitions. Results were analysed by the unmatched win-ratio method. A win ratio that exceeds 1.00 reflects a better outcome. A total of 5661 patients underwent randomization; 2830 were assigned to receive sacubitril/valsartan and 2831 to receive ramipril. The hierarchical analysis of the principal composite outcome demonstrated a larger number of wins (1 265 767 [15.7%]) than losses (1 079 502 [13.4%]) in the sacubitril/valsartan group (win ratio of 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.33; p = 0.015). Sensitivity analyses using alternative definitions of the composite outcome showed results similar to those of the principal analysis, except for analysis restricted to events that met CEC definitions (win ratio of 1.11, 95% CI 0.96-1.30; p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: In this post-hoc analysis of the PARADISE-MI trial using the win ratio and including investigator-identified events not having CEC confirmation, sacubitril/valsartan was superior to ramipril among high-risk survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention.

BACKGROUND: A polypill that includes key medications associated with improved outcomes (aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and statin) has been proposed as a simple approach to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular death and complications after myocardial infarction. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patients with myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months to a polypill-based strategy or usual care. The polypill treatment consisted of aspirin (100 mg), ramipril (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), and atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg). The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischemic stroke. RESULTS: A total of 2499 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a median of 36 months. A primary-outcome event occurred in 118 of 1237 patients (9.5%) in the polypill group and in 156 of 1229 (12.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.96; P = 0.02). A key secondary-outcome event occurred in 101 patients (8.2%) in the polypill group and in 144 (11.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.90; P = 0.005). The results were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Medication adherence as reported by the patients was higher in the polypill group than in the usual-care group. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin within 6 months after myocardial infarction resulted in a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than usual care. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020; SECURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02596126; EudraCT number, 2015-002868-17.).

Effects of Ramipril on Biomarkers of Endothelial Dysfunction and Inflammation in Hypertensive Children on Maintenance Hemodialysis: the SEARCH Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in end-stage kidney disease. We evaluated the effects of ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibition on biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in hypertensive children with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 135 (72 males/63 females) children and adolescents (age 7-15 years) were randomly assigned to treatment with either 2.5 mg once daily ramipril (n=68) or placebo (n=67) for 16 weeks. Primary outcome were the serum concentrations of asymmetrical dimethylarginine, a marker of endothelial dysfunction and hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), a marker of inflammation. Changes in IL-6 (interleukin-6), TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), systolic (S), and diastolic (D) blood pressure were secondary outcomes. Change in potassium levels and incidence of hyperkalemia were among the safety parameters. RESULTS: Ramipril, but not placebo, significantly reduced serum levels of asymmetrical dimethylarginine (-79.6%; P<0.001), hs-CRP (-46.5%; P<0.001), IL-6 (-27.1%; P<0.001), and TNF-α (-51.7%; P<0.001). Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were significantly lowered in both groups with a greater reduction in children receiving ramipril (median between-group differences -12.0 [95% CI -18.0 to -9.5] and -9.0 [95% CI -12.0 to -4.5]; P<0.001, respectively). Changes in asymmetrical dimethylarginine, hs-CRP, IL-6, or TNF-α in the ramipril group did not significantly correlate with blood pressure reductions. No severe cases of hyperkalemia or other serious treatment-associated adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ramipril improves biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in hypertensive children on maintenance hemodialysis in addition to its efficacious and safe potential to lower blood pressure. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04582097.

Ramipril Improves Endothelial Function and Increases the Number of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Endothelial dysfunction and reduced number of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in peripheral blood are contributing factors to cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Endothelial progenitor cell proliferation is regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. METHODS: This was a randomized trial including 37 female SLE patients without cardiovascular risk factors allocated into 2 groups: 19 patients received ramipril 10 mg/d for 12 weeks (IG) and 18 patients maintained without ramipril (CG). Endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery ultrasound measuring flow-mediated dilation, and EPCs were quantified by flow cytometry and cell culture, at baseline and after 12 weeks. Serum VEGF levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analysis was intention to treat. p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, higher flow-mediated dilation (6.17% vs. 11.14%, p < 0.001) was observed in IG, without change in CG (5.37% vs. 5.02%, p = 0.630). Higher number of EPC colony-forming units was also observed in IG (21.3 ± 10.4 vs. 31.6 ± 8.5, p < 0.001), without difference in CG ( p = 0.714). No difference was found in EPCs evaluated by flow cytometry. Vascular endothelial growth factor level increased after 12 weeks in IG ( p = 0.048), with no difference in CG ( p = 0.661). CONCLUSION: Ramipril improved endothelial function and increased the numbers of EPCs evaluated by cell culture and VEGF levels in SLE patients without cardiovascular risk factors. These data suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor bring an extra benefit beyond the hypotensive action and should be considered as a preferred antihypertensive drug in SLE patients.

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

In patient with symptomatic heart failure sacubitril valsartan has been found to reduces the risk of hospitalization and death from cardiovascular causes more effectively then angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitor trail comparing the effect of these drugs in acute myocardial infarction is lacking. MATERIAL: We randomly assigned patient with acute myocardial infarction complicated with reduced LVEF, or pulmonary congestion to recieve sacubitril 97mg-valsartan 103mg and ramipril 5mg twice daily the primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or incident heart failure, outpatient symptomatic heart failure or heart failure leading to hospitalization whichever occure first. OBSERVATION: Total 566 patient was taken in randomization 283 receive sacubitril-valsartan and 283 receive ramipril over a median of 22 months total outcome occure in 138 patient in sacubitril-valsartan group and in137 patient with ramipril group(hazard ratio 0.90: 95%confidence interval death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure occure i 10.9% patient reciveing sacubitril-valsartan and in 11.8%patient with ramipril group death from cardiovascular causes is 5.9 and 6.7% respectively death from anyother causes is 7.5 and 8.5 % respectively in both sacubitril-valsartan and ramipril group. CONCLUSION: Sacubitril-valsartan was not associated with significantly lower incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or incidents heart failure then ramipril in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

DPP4 (Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4) Inhibition Increases Catecholamines Without Increasing Blood Pressure During Sustained ACE (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) Inhibitor Treatment.

BACKGROUND: DPP4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitors comprise a class of oral diabetes medication that have the potential for off-target cardiovascular effects. We previously showed that DPP4 inhibition attenuates the hypotensive effect of acute ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibition and increases norepinephrine. Here, we investigated the effects of DPP4 during sustained ACE inhibition compared with during therapy with an ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker) or calcium channel blocker (neutral comparator) in a randomized, double-blinded crossover study. METHODS: We enrolled 106 adults with type 2 diabetes and hypertension and 100 received intervention. Subjects were randomized to one of 3 blood pressure arms: ramipril, valsartan, or amlodipine for a total of 15 weeks and received 3 one-week crossover therapies in random order: placebo + placebo, sitagliptin + placebo, and sitagliptin + aprepitant separated by 4-week washout. RESULTS: We found that DPP4 inhibition increased norepinephrine during ramipril but did not increase blood pressure. Aprepitant, a NK1 (substance P) receptor blocker, lowered standing heart rate during renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade with ramipril or valsartan. CONCLUSIONS: Increased catecholamines during concurrent ACE and DPP4 inhibition may contribute to cardiovascular complications in patients predisposed to heart failure.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists and angiotensin-receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor utilization in heart failure patients: Sub-analysis of a nation-wide population-based study in the Czech Republic.

AIMS: Sub-analysis of a retrospective nation-wide observational analysis of heart failure (HF) epidemiology reported to the Czech National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services between 2012 and 2018 aimed at angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists (ARB) and angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use. METHODS AND RESULTS: ACEi and ARBs were generally used in 87.6% of all HF patients in 2012 (n=154 627); 84.5% in 2013 (n=170 861); 83.5% in 2014 (n=186 963); 81.6% in 2015 (n=198 844); 80.1% in 2016 (n=205 793); 78.0% in 2017 (n=212 152) and in 76.7% in 2018 (n=219 235). In a sub-analysis of patients with a medical procedure and/or examination using an I50.x ICD code accounted for in the given year, ACEi and ARBs were generally used in 99.3% in 2012 (n=63 250); 96% in 2013 (n=62 241); 95.2% in 2014 (n=64 414); 93.3% in 2015 (n=65 217); 91.8% in 2016 (n=65 236); 90.1% in 2017 (n=65 761) and in 88.6% in 2018 (n=66 332). In 2018, the majority of patients with HF were prescribed ramipril (n=49 909; 17.5%) and perindopril (n=44 332; 15.5%). The mostly prescribed ARBs in 2018 were telmisartan (n=18 669; 6.5%); losartan (n=13 935; 4.9%) and valsartan (n=4 849; 1.7%). In 24.5% of cases, ACEIs and ARBs were prescribed in a fixed combination with another drug. ARNI became gradually more prescribed from 2018 (n=9 659 in November 2020). CONCLUSION: In an analysis of ACEIs, ARBs and ARNIs utilization in all patients treated for heart failure in the given year in the whole country, we found a comparable rate of drug prescription in comparison with specific heart failure registries. This indicates a good translation of current standard of care into common clinical practice. Ramipril and perindopril remained the mostly prescribed ACEIs and telmisartan became the mostly prescribed ARB. Since 2018, ARNIs began to be widely prescribed.

Associations between systemic medications and development of wet age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To examine whether systemic medications are associated with the subsequent development of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective study of 259 562 individuals based on registry data, from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2017. End-point event was the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnosis for wet AMD. Association between use of systemic medication covering 85 generic drugs categorized according to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes and the incidence of wet AMD was evaluated using multivariate Poisson regression model (adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, cancer and socioeconomic group) and nested case-control design. RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up was 9.84 years. The number of cases with wet AMD was 2947 and incidence rate was 1.15 per 1000 person-years. After adjustment, we observed an increased risk for the development of wet AMD for patients exposed to amlodipine (IRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16-1.53), or felodipine (1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.50). Similarly, an increased risk of wet AMD was associated with the use of bicalutamide (2.14, 95% CI 1.14-4.02), estradiol (1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.40) and atorvastatin (1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.43). Of note, digoxin (0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.91), and ramipril (0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.99) users had a lower incidence of wet AMD. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the use of second-generation calcium channel blockers could be associated with an increased risk for wet AMD development. Of note, the incidence of wet AMD seemed to be lower in patients using ramipril and digoxin. More studies are needed to elucidate the associations further.

Randomised controlled trial into the role of ramipril in fibrosis reduction in rheumatic heart disease: the RamiRHeD trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a major burden in developing countries and accounts for 80% of all people living with the disease, where it causes most cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in children and young adults. Chronic inflammation and fibrosis of heart valve tissue due to chronic inflammation in RHD will cause calcification and thickening of the impacted heart valves, especially the mitral valve. This fibrogenesis is enhanced by the production of angiotensin II by increased transforming growth factor ß expression and later by the binding of interleukin-33, which is known to have antihypertrophic and antifibrotic effects, to soluble sST2. sST2 binding to this non-natural ligand worsens fibrosis. Therefore, we hypothesise that ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) would improve rheumatic mitral valve stenosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial with a pre-post test design. Patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and valve dysfunction will be planned for cardiac valve replacement operation and will be given ramipril 5 mg or placebo for a minimum of 12 weeks before the surgery. The expression of ST2 in the mitral valve is considered to be representative of cardiac fibrosis. Mitral valve tissue will be stained by immunohistochemistry to ST2. Plasma ST2 will be measured by ELISA. This study is conducted in the Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, National Cardiac Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, starting on 27 June 2019. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The performance and dissemination of this study were approved by the ethics committee of National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita with ethical code LB.02.01/VII/286/KEP.009/2018. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03991910.