COVID Arm After Moderna Booster in Healthcare Worker: A Case Report.

SARS CoV-2 virus has infected more than 200 million people worldwide and more than 4.4 million in Indonesia. The vaccination program has become one of the solutions launched by many countries globally, including Indonesia, to reduce the transmission rate of COVID-19. Various vaccination platforms are produced, such as inactivated, viral vector, mRNA, and protein subunit. The vaccination booster program with mRNA platform (Moderna) was launched by the Indonesian government to give better protection for health care workers, particularly from delta variant. In this case report, we discuss one of the typical side effects of Moderna vaccine, which is referred to as the COVID arm.

Delayed Localized Hypersensitivity Reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Series.

Importance: In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 2 mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2020. Some patients in the US have developed delayed localized cutaneous vaccine reactions that have been dubbed "COVID arm." Objective: To describe the course of localized cutaneous injection-site reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, subsequent reactions to the second vaccine dose, and to characterize the findings of histopathologic examination of the reaction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series study was performed at Yale New Haven Hospital, a tertiary medical center in New Haven, Connecticut, with 16 patients referred with localized cutaneous injection-site reactions from January 20 through February 12, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: We collected each patient's demographic information, a brief relevant medical history, clinical course, and treatment (if any); and considered the findings of a histopathologic examination of 1 skin biopsy specimen. Results: Of 16 patients (median [range] age, 38 [25-89] years; 13 [81%] women), 14 patients self-identified as White and 2 as Asian. The delayed localized cutaneous reactions developed in a median (range) of 7 (2-12) days after receiving the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. These reactions occurred at or near the injection site and were described as pruritic, painful, and edematous pink plaques. None of the participants had received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Results of a skin biopsy specimen demonstrated a mild predominantly perivascular mixed infiltrate with lymphocytes and eosinophils, consistent with a dermal hypersensitivity reaction. Of participants who had a reaction to first vaccine dose (15 of 16 patients), most (11 patients) developed a similar localized injection-site reaction to the second vaccine dose; most (10 patients) also developed the second reaction sooner as compared with the first-dose reaction. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinical and histopathologic findings of this case series study indicate that the localized injection-site reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine are a delayed hypersensitivity reaction. These reactions may occur sooner after the second dose, but they are self-limited and not associated with serious vaccine adverse effects. In contrast to immediate hypersensitivity reactions (eg, anaphylaxis, urticaria), these delayed reactions (dubbed "COVID arm") are not a contraindication to subsequent vaccination.

Subcutaneous Injection Site Pain of Formulation Matrices.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to systematically evaluate the effects of formulation composition on subcutaneous injection site pain (ISP) using matrices comprising of common pharmaceutical excipients. METHODS: Two randomized, blinded, crossover studies in healthy subjects were conducted at a single site, where subjects received 1 mL SC injections of the buffer matrices. ISP intensity was measured using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), which was then analyzed via heatmap, categorical grouping, subgroup analysis, and paired delta analysis. RESULTS: Buffer type, buffer concentration and tonicity agent showed a substantial impact on ISP. Citrate buffer demonstrated a higher ISP than acetate buffer or saline). The 20 mM citrate buffer was more painful than 10 or 5 mM citrate buffers. NaCl and propylene glycol were significantly more painful than sugar alcohols (mannitol, sucrose, trehalose or glycerol). Histidine buffers exhibited ISP in the descending order of 150 mM > 75 mM > 25 mM > 0 mM NaCl, while histidine buffers containing Arginine-HCl at 0, 50, or 150 mM all showed very low ISP. Histidine buffer at pH 6.5 showed a lower ISP than pH 5.7. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic study via orthogonal analyses demonstrated that subcutaneous ISP is significantly influenced by solution composition.

Clinical Evaluation of an Investigational 5 mL Wearable Injector in Healthy Human Subjects.

An investigational wearable injector (WI), the BD Libertas Wearable Injector (BD Libertas is a trademark of Becton, Dickinson and Company), was evaluated in an early feasibility clinical study for functional performance, tissue effects, subject tolerability, and acceptability of 5 mL, non-Newtonian ~ 8 cP subcutaneous placebo injections in 52 healthy adult subjects of 2 age groups (18-64 years and ≥ 65 years). Randomized WI subcutaneous injections (n = 208, 4/subject) were delivered to the right and left abdomen and thigh of each subject, 50% (1 thigh and 1 abdomen) with a defined movement sequence during injection. Injector functional performance was documented. Deposition was qualified and quantified with ultrasound. Tissue effects and tolerability (pain) were monitored through 24 hours with corresponding acceptability questionnaires administered through 72 hours. WI (n = 205) automatically inserted the needle, delivered 5 mL ± 5% in 5.42 minutes (SD 0.74) and retracted. Depots were entirely (93.2%) or predominantly (5.4%) localized within the target subcutaneous tissue. Slight to moderate wheals (63.9%) and erythema (75.1%) were observed with ≥ 50% resolution within 30-60 minutes. Subject pain (100 mm Visual Analog Scale) peaked mid-injection (mean 9.1 mm, SD 13.4) and rapidly resolved within 30 minutes (mean 0.4 mm, SD 2.6). Subjects' peak pain (≥ 90.2%), injection site appearance (≥ 92.2%) and injector wear, size, and removal (≥ 92.1%) were acceptable (Likert responses) with 100% likely to use the injector if prescribed. Injection site preference was divided between none (46%), abdomen (25%), or thigh (26.9%). The investigational WI successfully delivered 5 mL viscous subcutaneous injections. Tissue effects and pain were transient, well-tolerated and acceptable. Neither injection site, movement or subject age affected injector functional performance or subject pain and acceptability.

Cutaneous adverse events induced by azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndrome patients: Case reports and a lesson from published work review.

Subcutaneous injection of azacitidine (AZA) is an important treatment option for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), which improves overall survival. In hematology, the incidence of AZA-induced cutaneous adverse events (AE) has been known to be relatively high, which has not been well recognized by dermatologists. Discontinuation of AZA can result in the deterioration of MDS disease activity. Therefore, on dermatological consultation, precise evaluation of AE severity and careful consideration is required for post-AE medication management. To enhance our understanding of AZA-induced cutaneous AE, we report four cases with two representative cutaneous AE subtypes and summarize the clinicopathological phenotypes and courses of the cases in the published work. Case 1, a 71-year-old man, developed neutrophilic dermatosis involving the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The other three cases, a 75-year-old man, a 78-year-old woman and a 68-year-old man, presented injection-site erythema associated with flare-up reaction. Discontinuation of AZA was necessary for case 1 alone. The published work review delineated three major subtypes of AZA-induced cutaneous AE: systemic cutaneous reaction, neutrophilic dermatosis type and erythematous type injection-site reaction. Histologically, the first two subtypes are mostly characterized by neutrophil infiltration, while the third subtype presents lymphocytic cell infiltration. Neither AZA discontinuation nor intensive interventions were required for the erythematous type injection-site reaction, while AZA termination or systemic treatments, represented by corticosteroid administration, were preferentially conducted for the systemic cutaneous reaction or the neutrophilic dermatosis type injection-site reaction subgroup. These observations support the necessity of subtype-dependent treatment strategies for the management of AZA-induced cutaneous AE.

Mycobacterium abscessus infections following injection of botulinum toxin.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Mycobacterium abscessus infections has increased in recent years. Some of these infections are caused by invasive cosmetic procedures. AIMS: Raising the awareness of cosmetic procedure related Mycobacterium abscessus infection for clinicians. PATIENTS/METHODS: We presented a 28-year-old woman who developed multiple erythema and painful nodules in her lower extremities after injections of botulinum toxin. RESULTS: Mycobacterium culture and strain identification of the tissue confirmed Mycobacterium abscessus. Combination antibiotics therapy was given and the lesion healed with scar and pigmentation. CONCLUSION: Mycobacterium abscessus infections following injection of botulinum toxin are rare and easily misdiagnosed as common suppurative infections. Early microbiologic tests are necessary for diagnose. Standardized operation should be performed to avoid this particular infection.

Cutaneous necrotic lesion: A wonderful delay adverse effect of interferon beta-1b injection for multiple sclerosis treatment.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and inflammatory autoimmune disease. These patients may manifest severe inflammatory cutaneous reactions after using interferon beta-1b. This article describes a 55-year-old man with severe injection site reactions after 10 years administration of interferon beta-1b. The biopsy specimens revealed skin and subcutaneous tissue necrosis. Histologic evaluation revealed nonspecific inflammatory reactions with no evidence of vasculitis or granulomatous reactions. Based on clinical and pathological findings, the diagnosis of skin and soft tissue necrosis due to interferon injection was given. The injection of interferon beta-1b in the affected areas was stopped, and the patient's clinical condition improved by wound care. This report is aimed to increase awareness about severe adverse skin reactions, which may infrequently occur with subcutaneous interferon beta-1b injection after several years. Early diagnosis of this reaction can help to prevent associated complications.

Efficacy and Safety of Prabotulinumtoxin A and Onabotulinumtoxin A for Crow's Feet: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Split-Face Study.

BACKGROUND: Prabotulinumtoxin A has been shown to have efficacy for the treatment of upper-limb spasticity and improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines. However, the efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxin A for crow's feet have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of crow's feet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, split-face study was conducted in subjects with bilateral symmetric, moderate to severe crow's feet at maximum smile. The investigators assessed the severity of crow's feet by using the facial wrinkle scale, and the subjects reported the improvement in severity, their subjective satisfaction, and perceived age. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of subjects with Grade 0 or 1 severity of crow's feet at maximum smile at Week 4 as assessed by the investigators. RESULTS: In the primary efficacy outcome assessment, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (prabotulinumtoxin A, 65.02%; onabotulinumtoxin A, 62.56%; p = .0956). All secondary efficacy outcomes were also achieved. Adverse events related to injection were mild and recovered spontaneously. CONCLUSION: Prabotulinumtoxin A and onabotulinumtoxin A have comparable efficacy and safety in the treatment of crow's feet.

Serious complication as a result of lip augmentation with vitamin E.

Nowadays lip augmentation with FDA-approved fillers is becoming popular. However, because of financial concerns many patients seek for unregistered materials. Here, we report two cases who use vitamin E for lip augmentation. They experience severe infiltration and discharge less than one month after injection. Biopsy revealed lipogranuloma formation. They were treated with incision and drainage, antibiotic, and corticosteroids. Although these complications are usually difficult to treat, the patients had good clinical response and no recurrence in 5-month follow-up.

Clinical significance of rituximab infusion-related reaction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients receiving R-CHOP.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was to evaluate the clinical significance of infusion-related reaction (IRR) of rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who received R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) as a first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: The medical records of 326 patients diagnosed with DLBCL were re trospectively analyzed. Both doctor's progress records and nursing records were reviewed. IRR was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria. RESULTS: IRR was not associated with overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) of DLBCL patients as compared to those who did not have IRR (OS: median 78.0 months vs. 69.0 months, p = 0.700; PFS: median 65.4 months vs. 64.0 months, p = 0.901). IRR grade did not affect OS or PFS. B symptoms was independently associated with IRR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.850; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.041 to 3.290; p = 0.036). Further, bone marrow involvement was independently associated with re-IRR (HR, 4.904; 95% CI, 0.767 to 3.118; p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that IRR of rituximab is not associated with OS or PFS of DLBCL patients who received R-CHOP. Furthermore, our study suggests a need for more careful observation for IRR in patients with B symptoms or bone marrow involvement.

Feline injection site sarcoma: immunohistochemical characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: Feline injection site sarcoma (FISS) is a rapid growing locally aggressive tumor with a low metastatic rate. Its histologic features are clearly defined, but there are few studies regarding its immunohistochemical characteristics. The present study investigated the immunohistochemical characteristics of 21 cases of FISS. METHODS: FISSs from 12 male and nine female cats, 20 mixed-breed and one Siamese, were included in the study. After histopathological diagnosis, additional histologic sections were immunostained for vimentin, cytokeratin, desmin, S100 protein, viral feline leukemia virus (FeLV) particles, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and c-KIT. Positive and negative controls were adopted accordingly. Immunostainings were classified as positive or negative according to the number of positive cells from a total of 1000 cells per tumor section. RESULTS: Histopathologic diagnosis of the tumors revealed 18 (85.7%) fibrosarcomas and three (14.3%) other sarcomas; four fibrosarcomas (22.2%) were grade III, five (27.8%) were grade II and nine (50.0%) were grade I. Two sarcomas were grade III and one was grade II. Seventeen (81%) tumors were negative for desmin. All samples were positive for vimentin. Twenty tumors (95.2%) were positive for S-100 protein. Positivity for c-KIT was observed in four (19%) samples; COX-2 was positive in 13 (61.9%) and FeLV viral particles were positive in nine (42.9%) FISSs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Immunohistochemical findings of FISSs revealed positive immunostainings for desmin, vimentin, S-100 protein, c-KIT, COX-2 and FeLV viral particles.

Incidence and Management of Infusion Reactions to Infliximab in an Alternate Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is a chimeric anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody that ameliorates inflammation when it binds to and neutralizes TNF-α. It is often used in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to reduce the severity of disease symptoms and induce disease remission. Infusions are generally administered in the hospital setting due to concerns over patient safety, and limited data exist regarding the incidence and management of infusion reactions (IRs) in an alternate care setting without direct physician oversight. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of IRs following administration of infliximab and associated management approaches in an alternate care setting. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 796 patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis that received a combined 5581 infusions with one home infusion provider between January 2014 and November 2016 was conducted. Timing, severity, management approach, and outcomes of IRs were abstracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 109 infusion reactions (2.0% of all infusions) were recorded in 62 patients (7.8% of all patients). The majority of these reactions were acute and mild or moderate in severity and resolved with rate adjustments and/or medication. Emergency room visits were required in 0.1% of all infusions, and 0.3% of all infusions were not completed due to a reaction. CONCLUSIONS: IRs to infliximab were uncommon and mostly mild or moderate in severity. Resolution of the IR and continuation of therapy was achieved in most patients through a management approach that included prompt recognition and initial treatment via rate adjustments and medications according to physician's orders.

Carcinosarcoma mimicking a feline injection-site sarcoma in a cat.

A 15-year-old spayed female domestic short-haired cat with cutaneous/subcutaneous well-circumscribed, alopecic mass approximately 25 × 30 mm in diameter, localized to the left shoulder region was brought to the veterinary surgery department. Despite the suggestive location and macroscopic appearance, feline injection-site sarcoma was not suspected based on the cytologic examination of fine-needle aspirates. The tumor was surgically resected, and tissue sections were evaluated microscopically. The tumor was found to be nonencapsulated with a distinct border between the neoplastic parenchyma and surrounding connective tissue. The neoplastic tissue consisted of 2 cell populations: elongated to spindle-shaped cells arranged in bands and cords and malignant epithelial-like cells. Both populations showed microscopic features of malignancy. Multinucleate giant cells with irregular cytoplasm were scattered among the neoplastic cells. The spindle-shaped cells strongly expressed vimentin but did not express α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) or cytokeratin. Desmin was strongly expressed in about 0-5% of cells. Epithelial-like cells expressed cytokeratin, but not vimentin, desmin, or α-SMA. Multinucleate giant cells expressed vimentin, but did not α-SMA, desmin, or cytokeratin. Based on microscopic observations and IHC results, the final diagnosis was carcinosarcoma with histologic features compatible with feline injection-site sarcoma, but without the clinical aggressiveness of this tumor.