A retrospective multicenter study on clinical and serological parameters in patients with MuSK myasthenia gravis with and without general immunosuppression.

Introduction: Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)- myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by pathogenic autoantibodies against MuSK that correlate with disease severity and are predominantly of the IgG4 subclass. The first-line treatment for MuSK-MG is general immunosuppression with corticosteroids, but the effect of treatment on IgG4 and MuSK IgG4 levels has not been studied. Methods: We analyzed the clinical data and sera from 52 MuSK-MG patients (45 female, 7 male, median age 49 (range 17-79) years) from Italy, the Netherlands, Greece and Belgium, and 43 AChR-MG patients (22 female, 21 male, median age 63 (range 2-82) years) from Italy, receiving different types of immunosuppression, and sera from 46 age- and sex-matched non-disease controls (with no diagnosed diseases, 38 female, 8 male, median age 51.5 (range 20-68) years) from the Netherlands. We analyzed the disease severity (assessed by MGFA or QMG score), and measured concentrations of MuSK IgG4, MuSK IgG, total IgG4 and total IgG in the sera by ELISA, RIA and nephelometry. Results: We observed that MuSK-MG patients showed a robust clinical improvement and reduction of MuSK IgG after therapy, and that MuSK IgG4 concentrations, but not total IgG4 concentrations, correlated with clinical severity. MuSK IgG and MuSK IgG4 concentrations were reduced after immunosuppression in 4/5 individuals with before-after data, but data from non-linked patient samples showed no difference. Total serum IgG4 levels were within the normal range, with IgG4 levels above threshold (1.35g/L) in 1/52 MuSK-MG, 2/43 AChR-MG patients and 1/45 non-disease controls. MuSK-MG patients improved within the first four years after disease onset, but no further clinical improvement or reduction of MuSK IgG4 were observed four years later, and only 14/52 (26.92%) patients in total, of which 13 (93.3%) received general immunosuppression, reached clinical remission. Discussion: We conclude that MuSK-MG patients improve clinically with general immunosuppression but may require further treatment to reach remission. Longitudinal testing of individual patients may be clinically more useful than single measurements of MuSK IgG4. No significant differences in the serum IgG4 concentrations and IgG4/IgG ratio between AChR- and MuSK-MG patients were found during follow-up. Further studies with larger patient and control cohorts are necessary to validate the findings.

[AChR Antibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis].

Herein, we describe the mechanisms, diagnostic procedures, and treatment options for acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG). The upstream pathomechanism of this condition involves AChR-sensitized T cell-dependent B cell proliferation and the subsequent production of pathogenic autoantibodies. Downstream molecules include AChR antibodies that activate complement pathways, resulting in the destruction of motor endplates. We further introduce newly-developed molecular targeted drugs for the treatment of MG that aims to secure patients' health-related quality of life.

[Muscle-Specific Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Antibody Positive Myasthenia Gravis].

Reportedly, patients with muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MG) account for approximately 3.0% of all patients with MG in Japan. Compared with patients who have acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive MG, those with MuSK antibody-positive MG show young-onset disease with female predominance, a low rate of ocular involvement (5.9%), and greater severity of dysphagia. The aforementioned types of MG are indistinguishable based on clinical symptoms and electrophysiological tests, and measurement of MuSK antibodies is essential for diagnosis. Thymectomy and complement inhibitors are not indicated for treatment, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, steroids, immunosuppressants, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, and neonatal Fc receptor inhibitors are used.

B-cell immune dysregulation with low soluble CD22 levels in refractory seronegative myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG), primarily caused by acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibodies, is a chronic autoimmune disorder causing severe muscle weakness and fatigability. In particular, seronegative MG constitutes 10%-15% of MG cases and presents diagnostic challenges especially in early-onset female patients who often show severe disease and resistance to immunosuppressive therapy. Furthermore, the immunopathology of seronegative MG remains unclear. Thus, in this study, we aimed to elucidate the pathogenic mechanism of seronegative MG using scRNA-seq analysis and plasma proteome analysis; in particular, we investigated the relationship between immune dysregulation status and disease severity in refractory seronegative MG. Employing single-cell RNA-sequencing and plasma proteome analyses, we analyzed peripheral blood samples from 30 women divided into three groups: 10 healthy controls, 10 early-onset AChR-positive MG, and 10 refractory early-onset seronegative MG patients, both before and after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. The disease severity was evaluated using the MG-Activities of Daily Living (ADL), MG composite (MGC), and revised 15-item MG-Quality of Life (QOL) scales. We observed numerical abnormalities in multiple immune cells, particularly B cells, in patients with refractory seronegative MG, correlating with disease activity. Notably, severe MG cases had fewer regulatory T cells without functional abnormalities. Memory B cells were found to be enriched in peripheral blood cells compared with naïve B cells. Moreover, plasma proteome analysis indicated significantly lower plasma protein levels of soluble CD22, expressed in the lineage of B-cell maturation (including mature B cells and memory B cells), in refractory seronegative MG patients than in healthy donors or patients with AChR-positive MG. Soluble CD22 levels were correlated with disease severity, B-cell frequency, and RNA expression levels of CD22. In summary, this study elucidates the immunopathology of refractory seronegative MG, highlighting immune disorders centered on B cells and diminished soluble CD22 levels. These insights pave the way for novel MG treatment strategies focused on B-cell biology.

Detection of Autoantibodies Against the Acetylcholine Receptor, Evaluation of Commercially Available Methodologies: Fixed Cell-Based Assay, Radioimmunoprecipitation Assay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay1.

Background/Objective: Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by pathogenic autoantibodies (AAbs) targeting nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChR), disrupting neuromuscular communication. RadioImmunoPrecipitation Assay (RIPA) is recommended to detect AChR AAbs, but its complexity and radioactive requirements limit widespread use. We compare non-RIPA anti-AChR immunoassays, including Cell-Based Assay (CBA) and two ELISA kits, against the gold standard RIPA. Methods/Results: 145 samples were included with medical indication for anti-AChR testing. By the RIPA method, 63 were negative (RIPA-Neg < 0.02 nmol/L), 18 were classified as Borderline (≥0.02 -1 nmol/L), and 64 were positive (RIPA-Pos > 1 nmol/L). The competitive ELISA showed poor agreement with RIPA (Kappa = 0.216). The indirect ELISA demonstrated substantial agreement with RIPA (Kappa = 0.652), with ∼76% sensitivity and ∼94% specificity for MG diagnostic. The CBA, where fixed cells expressing clustered AChR were used as substrate, exhibited almost perfect agreement with RIPA (Kappa = 0.984), yielding ∼98% sensitivity and 96% specificity for MG. In addition, a semiquantitative analysis showed a strong correlation between CBA titration, indirect ELISA, and RIPA levels (r = 0.793 and r = 0.789, respectively). Conclusions: The CBA displayed excellent analytical performance for MG diagnostic when compared to RIPA, making it a potential replacement for RIPA in clinical laboratories. Some solid-phase assays (such as the indirect ELISA applied here), as well as CBA titration, offer reliable options to estimate anti-AChR AAb levels after confirming positivity by the CBA.∥.

Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods. METHODS: The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab). RESULTS: For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): - 52.6 (- 103.0, - 2.3)], at week 4 [- 4.0 (- 6.6, - 1.4)], and at time of best response [- 3.9 (- 6.5, - 1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [- 1.9 (- 3.3, - 0.5)] and at time of best response [- 1.4 (- 2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [- 3.2 (- 5.2, - 1.2)] and at time of best response [- 3.0 (- 5.0, - 1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [- 8.7 (- 36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [- 13.7 (- 50.3, 22.9)]. CONCLUSION: Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.

Gut microbiota-derived butyrate restores impaired regulatory T cells in patients with AChR myasthenia gravis via mTOR-mediated autophagy.

More than 80% of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) are positive for anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) suppress overproduction of these antibodies, and patients with AChR antibody-positive MG (AChR MG) exhibit impaired Treg function and reduced Treg numbers. The gut microbiota and their metabolites play a crucial role in maintaining Treg differentiation and function. However, whether impaired Tregs correlate with gut microbiota activity in patients with AChR MG remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that butyric acid-producing gut bacteria and serum butyric acid level are reduced in patients with AChR MG. Butyrate supplementation effectively enhanced Treg differentiation and their suppressive function of AChR MG. Mechanistically, butyrate activates autophagy of Treg cells by inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin. Activation of autophagy increased oxidative phosphorylation and surface expression of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 on Treg cells, thereby promoting Treg differentiation and their suppressive function in AChR MG. This observed effect of butyrate was blocked using chloroquine, an autophagy inhibitor, suggesting the vital role of butyrate-activated autophagy in Tregs of patients with AChR MG. We propose that gut bacteria derived butyrate has potential therapeutic efficacy against AChR MG by restoring impaired Tregs.

Juvenile ocular myasthenia gravis: a report of two cases.

We report 2 cases of pediatric ocular myasthenia gravis. The first case was a 7-year-old girl who presented with bilateral ophthalmoplegia and ptosis that correlated with the onset of upper respiratory symptoms. Neuroimaging and acetylcholine receptor antibody testing were unremarkable. The ice pack test was positive. Symptoms greatly improved with pyridostigmine, with full resolution of ophthalmoplegia achieved by 8-month follow-up. The second case was a 4-year-old girl who presented emergently with ptosis and bilateral ophthalmoplegia. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies testing was positive. The patient was started on pyridostigmine and intravenous immunoglobulin and is scheduled to follow-up with pediatric ophthalmology in the outpatient setting.

Unveiling the antinociceptive mechanisms of Methyl-2-(4-chloro-phenyl)-5-benzoxazoleacetate: insights from nociceptive assays in mice.

OBJECTIVE: Methyl-2-(4-chloro- phenyl)-5-benzoxazoleacetate (MCBA), a synthetic benzoxazole derivative with established antipsoriatic efficacy, was investigated for potential antinociceptive effects. This study employs various nociceptive assays in mice to elucidate MCBA's antinociceptive mechanisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MCBA's antinociceptive potential was tested against various nociception models induced by formalin, glutamate, capsaicin, a transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) receptor agonist, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, a protein kinase C (PKC) activator. It was then assessed using the hot plate test and examined within the acetic acid-induced writhing test. During the acetic acid-induced writhing test, MCBA was pre-challenged against selective receptor antagonists such as naloxone, caffeine, atropine, yohimbine, ondansetron, and haloperidol. It was also pre-challenged with ATP-sensitive potassium channel inhibitor (glibenclamide) to further elucidate its antinociceptive mechanism. RESULTS: The results showed that oral administration of MCBA led to a dose-dependent and significant inhibition (p < 0.05) of nociceptive effects across all evaluated models at doses of 60, 120, and 240 mg/kg. Moreover, the efficacy of MCBA's antinociceptive potential was significantly counteracted (p < 0.0001) by specific antagonists: (i) directed at adenosinergic, alpha-2 adrenergic, and cholinergic receptors using caffeine, yohimbine, and atropine, respectively; and (ii) targeting ATP-sensitive potassium channels, employing glibenclamide. Antagonists aimed at opioidergic and serotoninergic receptors (naloxone and ondansetron, respectively) had poor utility in inhibiting antinociceptive activity. Conversely, the dopaminergic receptor antagonist haloperidol potentiated locomotor abnormalities associated with MCBA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: MCBA-induced antinociception involves modulation of glutamatergic-, TRVP1 receptors- and PKC-signaling pathways. It impacts adenosinergic, alpha-2 adrenergic, and cholinergic receptors and opens ATP-sensitive potassium channels.

Alpha5 nicotine acetylcholine receptor subunit promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma metastasis.

Neurotransmitter-initiated signaling pathway were reported to play an important role in regulating the malignant phenotype of tumor cells. Cancer cells could exhibit a "neural addiction" property and build up local nerve networks to achieve an enhanced neurotransmitter-initiated signaling through nerve growth factor-mediated axonogenesis. Targeting the dysregulated nervous systems might represent a novel strategy for cancer treatment. However, whether intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) could build its own nerve networks and the role of neurotransmitters in the progression ICC remains largely unknown. Immunofluorescence staining and Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay suggested that ICC cells and the infiltrated nerves could generate a tumor microenvironment rich in acetylcholine that promotes ICC metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Acetylcholine promoted ICC metastasis through interacting with its receptor, alpha 5 nicotine acetylcholine receptor subunits (CHRNA5). Furthermore, acetylcholine/CHRNA5 axis activated GSK3ß/ß-catenin signaling pathway partially through the influx of Ca2+-mediated activation of Ca/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CAMKII). In addition, acetylcholine signaling activation also expanded nerve infiltration through increasing the expression of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), which formed a feedforward acetylcholine-BDNF axis to promote ICC progression. KN93, a small-molecule inhibitor of CAMKII, significantly inhibited the migration and enhanced the sensitivity to gemcitabine of ICC cells. Above all, Acetylcholine/CHRNA5 axis increased the expression of ß-catenin to promote the metastasis and resistance to gemcitabine of ICC via CAMKII/GSK3ß signaling, and the CAMKII inhibitor KN93 may be an effective therapeutic strategy for combating ICC metastasis.

[A case of myasthenia gravis with coexistence of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies and anti-P/Q-type VGCC antibodies].

A 79-year-old woman who presented ptosis and dysphagia were admitted to our hospital. Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies and anti-P/Q-type VGCC antibodies were both positive. Electrophysiological examination showed postsynaptic pattern which supported myasthenia gravis. She did not meet the diagnostic criteria for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). In cases which these antibodies coexist, careful electrophysiological evaluation is required for the diagnosis. In addition, although anti-P/Q-type VGCC antibodies have been specific to LEMS, patients with these antibodies represent various symptoms other than LEMS. Low and middle titer of the antibodies may be not specific to LEMS.

Epidemiology of seropositive myasthenia gravis in Sardinia: A population-based study in the district of Sassari.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The global incidence and prevalence of myasthenia gravis (MG) range between 6-31/million and 10-37/100,000, respectively. Sardinia is a high-risk region for different immune-mediated disorders, but the epidemiology of MG remains unclear. We determined the epidemiology of MG with acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-immunoglobulin G (IgG) and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-IgG in the district of Sassari (North-Western Sardinia; population, 325,288). METHODS: From the laboratory of the University Hospital of Sassari (reference for AChR/MuSK-IgG testing in Sardinia since 1998) and the main neurology units in Sardinia, we retrospectively identified MG patients with (1) AChR-IgG and/or MuSK-IgG positivity by radioimmunoprecipitation assay; and (2) residency in the district of Sassari. Incidence (January 2010-December 2019) and prevalence (December 31, 2019) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included (incident, 107; prevalent, 180). Antibody specificities were AChR (n = 187 [93%]) and MuSK (n = 15 [7%]). The crude MG incidence (95% confidence interval) was 32.6 (26.8-39.2)/million, while prevalence was 55.3 (47.7-63.9)/100,000. After age-standardization to the world population, incidence decreased to 18.4 (14.3-22.5)/million, while prevalence decreased to 31.6 (26.1-37.0)/100,000. Among incident cases, age strata (years) at MG onset were: <18 (2%), 18-49 (14%), 50-64 (21%), and ≥65 (63%). DISCUSSION: Sardinia is a high-risk region for MG, with a prevalence that exceeds the European threshold for rare disease. Identification of the environmental and genetic determinants of this risk may improve our understanding of disease pathophysiology.

Functional Signature of LRP4 Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Antibodies (Abs) specific for the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) occur in up to 5% of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). The objective of this study was to profile LRP4-Ab effector actions. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy of LRP4-specific compared with AChR-specific IgG to induce Ab-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and Ab-dependent complement deposition (ADCD). Functional features were additionally assessed in an independent AChR-Ab+ MG cohort. Levels of circulating activated complement proteins and frequency of Fc glycovariants were quantified and compared with demographically matched 19 healthy controls. RESULTS: Effector actions that required binding of Fc domains to cellular FcRs such as ADCC and ADCP were detectable for both LRP4-specific and AChR-specific Abs. In contrast to AChR-Abs, LRP4-binding Abs showed poor efficacy in inducing complement deposition. Levels of circulating activated complement proteins were not substantially increased in LRP4-Ab-positive MG. Frequency of IgG glycovariants carrying 2 sialic acid residues, indicative for anti-inflammatory IgG activity, was decreased in patients with LRP4-Ab-positive MG. DISCUSSION: LRP4-Abs are more effective in inducing cellular FcR-mediated effector mechanisms than Ab-dependent complement activation. Their functional signature is different from AChR-specific Abs.

Comparison of three methods for the detection of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase.

OBJECTIVES: To compare 3 different methods for the detection of antibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). METHODS: MuSK antibody testing was performed in 237 serum samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fixed cell-based assay (f-CBA-IFA). One hundred and forty-eight (148) of the sera had previously been tested by RIA during clinical testing: 47 MuSK antibody positive and 101 MuSK antibody negative. Of the MuSK RIA negative antibodies, 46 tested positive for other neural antibodies. Additionally, 89 sera were subsequently tested by all three methods: 70 healthy controls and 19 sera positive for other neural antibodies. RESULTS: Qualitative inter-assay agreement based on tiered RIA values was 100% for results of 1.00 nmol/L or greater by both methods; 81% and 94% for results between 0.21 and 0.99 nmol/L by ELISA and f-CBA-IFA, respectively; and 0% for results of 0.04-0.20 nmol/L by both methods. Negative results showed 100% agreement between RIA and both ELISA and f-CBA-IFA (n = 55). None of the controls positive for other neural autoantibodies or healthy controls were positive in any assay. CONCLUSION: Overall, excellent agreement was observed between the 3 methods used to detect antibodies against MuSK. Both the f-CBA-IFA and ELISA performed comparably to RIA and exhibited excellent overall accuracy for MuSK IgG detection, with the f-CBA-IFA demonstrating higher agreement between positive samples with the RIA than the ELISA without identifying false positives in the control samples. Advantages of non-radioactive methods for the detection of MuSK antibodies include reduced handling and disposal of hazardous materials, potential for automation and the reagents having a longer shelf-life, reducing costs associated with both workflow and lot validations. Thus, commercially available ELISA and transfected cell-based assays are viable alternatives to the traditional radioactive assay used for serologic determination of MuSK IgG.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis. METHODS: Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients. DISCUSSION: Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment.

BACKGROUND: Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research. METHODS: MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings. RESULTS: Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: From Old Drugs to Innovative Therapies with a Glimpse into the Future.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease that causes debilitating muscle weakness due to impaired neuromuscular transmission. Since most (about 80-90%) MG patients present autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor, standard medical therapy consists of symptomatic treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., pyridostigmine). In addition, considering the autoimmune basis of MG, standard therapy includes immunomodulating agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclosporine A, and cyclophosphamide. New strategies have been proposed for the treatment of MG and include complement blockade (i.e., eculizumab, ravulizumab, and zilucoplan) and neonatal Fc receptor antagonism (i.e., efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab). The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the five pharmacological treatments most recently approved for the treatment of MG, by identifying both preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov. A description of the molecules currently under evaluation for the treatment of MG is also provided.

Myasthenia gravis: the changing treatment landscape in the era of molecular therapies.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder that affects the neuromuscular junction, leading to muscle weakness and fatigue. MG is caused by antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) or other AChR-related proteins that are expressed in the postsynaptic muscle membrane. The standard therapeutic approach for MG has relied on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which have shown good efficacy in improving MG-related symptoms in most people with the disease; however, these therapies can carry a considerable burden of long-term adverse effects. Moreover, up to 15% of individuals with MG exhibit limited or no response to these standard therapies. The emergence of molecular therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, B cell-depleting agents and chimeric antigen receptor T cell-based therapies, has the potential to revolutionize the MG treatment landscape. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of the progress achieved in molecular therapies for MG associated with AChR antibodies and MuSK antibodies, elucidating both the challenges and the opportunities these therapies present to the field. The latest developments in MG treatment are described, exploring the potential for personalized medicine approaches.

Subcutaneous batoclimab in generalized myasthenia gravis: Results from a Phase 2a trial with an open-label extension.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety, tolerability, and key pharmacodynamic effects of subcutaneous batoclimab, a fully human anti-neonatal Fc receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis and anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies. METHODS: A Phase 2a, proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is described. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of batoclimab 340 mg, batoclimab 680 mg, or matching placebo for 6 weeks. Subsequently, all patients could enter an open-label extension study where they received batoclimab 340 mg once every 2 weeks for 6 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and change from baseline in total immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin G subclasses, and anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies at 6 weeks post-baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline to 6 weeks post-baseline for Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, Myasthenia Gravis Composite, and revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life scores. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were randomized to batoclimab 680 mg (n = 6), batoclimab 340 mg (n = 5), or placebo (n = 6). Batoclimab was associated with significantly greater reductions in total immunoglobulin G and anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies from baseline to 6 weeks post-baseline than placebo. Reductions in immunoglobulin G subclasses were generally consistent with total immunoglobulin G. While clinical measures showed directionally favorable improvements over time, the study was not powered to draw conclusions about therapeutic efficacy. No safety issues were identified. INTERPRETATION: The safety profile, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical benefits observed in this study support further investigation of subcutaneous batoclimab injections as a potential patient-administered therapy for seropositive generalized myasthenia gravis.