Histamine deficiency exacerbates cisplatin-induced ferroptosis in cochlea hair cells of HDC knockout mice.

Cisplatin (CDDP) is extensively utilized in the management of diverse types of cancers, but its ototoxicity cannot be ignored, and clinical interventions are not ideal. Histidine decarboxylase (HDC) is the exclusive enzyme for histamine synthesis. Anti-histamine receptor drugs are ubiquitously employed in the therapeutics of allergies and gastrointestinal diseases. Yet, the specific role of histamine and its signaling in the inner ear is not fully understood. This study utilized cisplatin treated mice and HEI-OC1 auditory hair cell line to establish a cisplatin-induced ototoxicity (CIO) model. Histidine decarboxylase knockout (HDC-/-) mice and histamine receptor 1 (H1R) antagonist were utilized to investigate the influence of HDC/histamine/H1R signaling on ototoxicity. The results identified HDC and H1R expression in mouse hair cells. Transcriptomics indicated that the expression levels of oxidative stress-related genes in the cochlea of HDC-/- mice increased. Furthermore, histamine deficiency or suppression of H1R signaling accelerated HC ferroptosis, a pivotal factor underlying the aggravation of CIO in vivo and in vitro, conversely, the supplementation of exogenous histamine reversed these deleterious effects. Mechanistically, this study revealed that the malfunction of HDC/histamine/H1R signaling induced upregulation of NRF2 expression, accompanied by the upregulation of ACSL4 and downregulation of GPX4 expression, which are major regulatory factors of ferroptosis. In summary, histamine deficiency may induce hair cell death by regulating the H1R pathway and exacerbate CIO. Our findings have indicated a potential therapeutic target for CIO.

Blockade of histamine receptor H1 augments immune checkpoint therapy by enhancing MHC-I expression in pancreatic cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has proven to be extremely effective at managing certain cancers, its efficacy in treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been limited. Therefore, enhancing the effect of ICB could improve the prognosis of PDAC. In this study, we focused on the histamine receptor H1 (HRH1) and investigated its impact on ICB therapy for PDAC. METHODS: We assessed HRH1 expression in pancreatic cancer cell (PCC) specimens from PDAC patients through public data analysis and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The impact of HRH1 in PCCs was evaluated using HRH1 antagonists and small hairpin RNA (shRNA). Techniques including Western blot, flow cytometry, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and microarray analyses were performed to identify the relationships between HRH1 and major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) expression in cancer cells. We combined HRH1 antagonism or knockdown with anti-programmed death receptor 1 (αPD-1) therapy in orthotopic models, employing IHC, immunofluorescence, and hematoxylin and eosin staining for assessment. RESULTS: HRH1 expression in cancer cells was negatively correlated with HLA-ABC expression, CD8+ T cells, and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Our findings indicate that HRH1 blockade upregulates MHC-I expression in PCCs via cholesterol biosynthesis signaling. In the orthotopic model, the combined inhibition of HRH1 and αPD-1 blockade enhanced cytotoxic CD8+ T cell penetration and efficacy, overcoming resistance to ICB therapy. CONCLUSIONS: HRH1 plays an immunosuppressive role in cancer cells. Consequently, HRH1 intervention may be a promising method to amplify the responsiveness of PDAC to immunotherapy.

Histamine H1 Receptor-Mediated JNK Phosphorylation Is Regulated by Gq Protein-Dependent but Arrestin-Independent Pathways.

Arrestins are known to be involved not only in the desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors but also in the G protein-independent activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), to regulate cell proliferation and inflammation. Our previous study revealed that the histamine H1 receptor-mediated activation of ERK is dually regulated by Gq proteins and arrestins. In this study, we investigated the roles of Gq proteins and arrestins in the H1 receptor-mediated activation of JNK in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing wild-type (WT) human H1 receptors, the Gq protein-biased mutant S487TR, and the arrestin-biased mutant S487A. In these mutants, the Ser487 residue in the C-terminus region of the WT was truncated (S487TR) or mutated to alanine (S487A). Histamine significantly stimulated JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR but not S487A. Histamine-induced JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR was suppressed by inhibitors against H1 receptors (ketotifen and diphenhydramine), Gq proteins (YM-254890), and protein kinase C (PKC) (GF109203X) as well as an intracellular Ca2+ chelator (BAPTA-AM) but not by inhibitors against G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2/3) (cmpd101), ß-arrestin2 (ß-arrestin2 siRNA), and clathrin (hypertonic sucrose). These results suggest that the H1 receptor-mediated phosphorylation of JNK is regulated by Gq-protein/Ca2+/PKC-dependent but GRK/arrestin/clathrin-independent pathways.

Histamine H1- and H4-receptor expression in human colon-derived cell lines.

In previous studies, we demonstrated the involvement of H4R in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and IBD-associated colon cancer in mice and could ascribe H4R-mediated histamine function to colon epithelial cells. The transferability of obtained data to humans is however lacking. Functional expression of H4R on colon epithelial cells is a prerequisite to pursue the hypothesis of involvement of H4R in carcinogenesis. Thus, we here compared the expression of histamine receptor subtypes in a series of cell lines. Out of these, three colon-derived cell lines displaying different combinations of H1R and H4R expression were submitted to functional analyses. Human hematopoietic HMC-1, HL-60, and U937, lung-derived A549 and Calu-3, and colorectal LoVo, SW 480, Caco-2, HT-29, and HCT116 cells were included in the study. mRNA expression was quantified by RT-qPCR. For functional analyses, Caco-2, HT-29, and HCT116 cells were treated by incubation with 1 - 10 µM histamine in the presence or absence of selective histamine receptor antagonists. Calcium mobilization, cAMP accumulation, and cell proliferation were measured by fluorimetry, mass spectrometry, and real-time bioimpedance measurements, respectively. Histamine receptor expression was heterogeneous in the cell lines tested. In most cell lines, we detected H1R mRNA while H4R mRNAs were found only occasionally. The colon-derived epithelial cell lines LoVo, SW480, and HT-29 expressed H1R mRNA exclusively, while in HCT116 cells H1R and H4R mRNAs and in CaCo-2 H2R mRNA were detectable. Subsequent functional analyses in HT29, Caco-2, and HCT116 cells, however, indicated that only HT-29 responded to histamine stimulation, by means of H1R. For a detailed analysis of histamine receptor function, esp. that of H1R and H4R, in human colon-derived cell lines, the cell lines tested here are not fully convenient unless genetically modified.

Exploring the interactions of antihistamine with retinoic acid receptor beta (RARB) by molecular dynamics simulations and genome-wide meta-analysis.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is one of the most common AIDS-related malignant neoplasms, which can leave lesions on the skin among HIV patients. These lesions can be treated with 9-cis-retinoic acid (9-cis-RA), an endogenous ligand of retinoic acid receptors that has been FDA-approved for treatment of KS. However, topical application of 9-cis-RA can induce several unpleasant side effects, like headache, hyperlipidemia, and nausea. Hence, alternative therapeutics with less side effects are desirable. There are case reports associating over-the-counter antihistamine usage with regression of KS. Antihistamines competitively bind to H1 receptor and block the action of histamine, best known for being released in response to allergens. Furthermore, there are already dozens of antihistamines that are FDA-approved with less side effects than 9-cis-RA. This led our team to conduct a series of in-silico assays to determine whether antihistamines can activate retinoic acid receptors. First, we utilized high-throughput virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations to model high-affinity interactions between antihistamines and retinoic acid receptor beta (RARß). We then performed systems genetics analysis to identify a genetic association between H1 receptor itself and molecular pathways involved in KS. Together, these findings advocate for exploration of antihistamines against KS, starting with our two promising hit compounds, bepotastine and hydroxyzine, for experimental validation study in the future.

Histamine promotes angiogenesis through a histamine H1 receptor-PKC-VEGF-mediated pathway in human endothelial cells.

Histamine is a well-known inflammatory mediator, but how histamine induces angiogenesis remains poorly understood. In the present study, we demonstrated a dose-dependent dynamic tube formation in the human endothelial cell line EA.hy926 in the presence of histamine that was completely blocked by histamine H1 receptor (H1R) and protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors. However, histamine H2, H3, and H4 receptor inhibitors did not inhibit tube formation, suggesting that H1R-PKC signaling is involved in histamine-induced tube formation. Moreover, we found an H1-specific induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. Inhibition of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) suppressed the histamine-induced tube formation, indicating that VEGF is downstream of histamine signaling. Additionally, we demonstrated that histamine stimulation induces the expression of critical regulators of angiogenesis such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and MMP-14 metalloproteases, as histamine-induced tube formation is blocked by MMP inhibitors. In summary, our study indicates that histamine can activate the H1R in human endothelial cells and thereby promote tube formation through the PKC, MMP, and VEGF signaling pathways.

Epigallocatechin gallate stimulated histamine production and downregulated histamine H1 receptor in oral cancer cell lines expressing histidine decarboxylase.

OBJECTIVES: Increased histamine production and the overexpression of receptors (H1R∼H4R) has been reported in several tumors. The effects of TGFß1 and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) on histamine synthesizing enzymes (HDCs), and the histamine transporter systems and receptors were investigated in this study. METHODS: Four oral cancer cell lines (HSC2, HSC3, HSC4, and SAS) were treated with or without TGFß1 or EGCG for 24 h. The expression levels of HDC, SLC22A3, H1R∼H4R, and TAS2R14 were investigated by Western blotting. Histamine concentrations were determined using the enzyme immune assay. Bitter taste receptor (TAS2R14 and TAS2R39) mRNAs were investigated by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Varying expression levels of HDC, SLC22A3, H1R∼H4R, and TAS2R14 were observed in the four cell lines, where histamine concentrations were found to be ∼500 fmol/ml in cell culture media and induced 2-2.5 times higher amounts of histamine following EGCG treatment. TGFß1 increased HDC expression in three cell lines, SLC22A3 expression in three cell lines, H1R expression in two cell lines, H2R expression in three cell lines, H3R expression in three cell lines, and H4R expression in three cell lines. EGCG decreased HDC expression in all four cell lines, SLC22A3 expression in three expression, H1R expression in all four cell lines, H2R expression in two cell lines, H3R expression in three cell lines, and H4R expression in two cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: EGCG upregulated histamine production and decreased the expression level of H1R in the oral cancer cell lines. It might prove useful for cancer therapy during histamine regulation.

Molecular Signaling and Transcriptional Regulation of Histamine H1 Receptor Gene.

Histamine-activated histamine H1 receptor (H1R) signaling regulates many gene expressions, mainly through the protein kinase C (PKC)/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) signaling. Involvement of other signaling, including NF-κB, Wnt, RUNX-2, and Rho A signaling was also demonstrated. In addition, cAMP production through the activation of H1R signaling was reported. H1R gene itself is also up-regulated by the activation of H1R signaling with histamine. Here, we review our recent findings in the molecular signaling and transcriptional regulation of the H1R gene. Stimulation with histamine up-regulates H1R gene expression through the activation of H1R in HeLa cells. The PKCδ/ERK/poly(ADP)ribosyl transferase-1 (PARP-1) signaling was involved in this up-regulation. Heat shock protein 90 also plays an important role in regulating PKCδ translocation. Promoter analyses revealed the existence of two promoters in the human H1R gene in HeLa cells. H1R-activated H1R gene up-regulation in response to histamine was also observed in U373 astroglioma cells. However, this up-regulation was mediated not through the PKCδ signaling but possibly through the PKCα signaling. In addition, the promoter region responsible for histamine-induced H1R gene transcription in U373 cells was different from that of HeLa cells. These findings suggest that the molecular signaling and transcriptional regulation of the H1R gene are different between neuronal cells and non-neuronal cells.

Histamine H1 receptor antagonists selectively kill cisplatin-resistant human cancer cells.

Cancer therapy is often hampered by the disease's development of resistance to anticancer drugs. We previously showed that the autonomously upregulated product of fibroblast growth factor 13 gene (FGF13; also known as FGF homologous factor 2 (FHF2)) is responsible for the cisplatin resistance of HeLa cisR cells and that it is likely responsible for the poor prognosis of cervical cancer patients treated with cisplatin. Here we show that cloperastine and two other histamine H1 receptor antagonists selectively kill HeLa cisR cells at concentrations that little affect parental HeLa S cells. The sensitivity of HeLa cisR cells to cloperastine was abolished by knocking down FGF13 expression. Cisplatin-resistant A549 cisR cells were similarly susceptible to cloperastine. H2, H3, and H4 receptor antagonists showed less or no cytotoxicity toward HeLa cisR or A549 cisR cells. These results indicate that histamine H1 receptor antagonists selectively kill cisplatin-resistant human cancer cells and suggest that this effect is exerted through a molecular mechanism involving autocrine histamine activity and high-level expression of FGF13. We think this represents a potential opportunity to utilize H1 receptor antagonists in combination with anticancer agents to treat cancers in which emergent drug-resistance is preventing effective treatment.

Histamine receptor 1 is expressed in leukaemic cells and affects differentiation sensitivity.

Despite the success of immunotherapy in several haematological neoplasms, the effectiveness in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is still controversial, partially due to the lack of knowledge regarding immune-related processes in this disease and similar neoplasias. In this study, we analysed the role and expression of histamine receptor 1 (HRH1) in haematological malignancies. Although the histamine receptor type 1 was widely expressed in healthy and malignant haematopoiesis, especially along the myeloid lineage, HRH1 lacked a relevant role in survival/proliferation and chemoresistance of AML cells, as analysed by HRH1 knockdown (KD) and pharmacological modulation. However, HRH1-mediated signalling was critical for the activation of the differentiation process induced by several agents including all-trans retinoic acid, establishing a role for HRH1 in myeloid differentiation. Pharmacological activation of Erk was able to partially restore differentiation capacity in HRH1 KD AML cells, suggesting that HRH1 signalling acts upstream MAPK-Erk pathway. As an indirect consequence of our results, treatment-related histamine release is not expected to confer a proliferative advantage in leukaemic cells.

Individualized treatment for allergic rhinitis based on key nasal clinical manifestations combined with histamine and leukotriene D4 levels / Tratamento individualizado para a rinite alérgica baseado nas principais manifestações clínicas nasais e dos níveis de histamina e leucotrieno D4

Abstract Introduction The types of allergic rhinitis are roughly classified based on the causative antigens, disease types, predilection time, and symptom severity. Objective To examine the clinical typing and individualized treatment approach for allergic rhinitis and to determine the optimal treatment method for this disease using various drug combination therapies. Methods A total of 108 participants with allergic rhinitis were divided into three groups based on symptoms. Subsequently, each group was further categorized into four subgroups based on the medications received. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated using the visual analog scale VAS scores of the total and individual nasal symptoms, decline index of the symptom score, histamine and leukotriene levels, and mRNA and protein expression levels of histamine 1 and cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptors. Results Loratadine + mometasone furoate and loratadine + mometasone furoate + montelukast significantly improved the sneezing symptom and reduced the histamine levels compared with the other combination therapies (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, montelukast + mometasone furoate and montelukast + mometasone furoate + loratadine considerably improved the nasal obstruction symptom and decreased the leukotriene D4 levels compared with the other combination therapies (p < 0.05). Conclusion Clinical symptom evaluation combined with experimental detection of histamine and leukotriene levels can be an objective and accurate method to clinically classify the allergic rhinitis types. Furthermore, individualized treatment based on allergic rhinitis classification can result in a good treatment efficacy.

Resumo Introdução A rinite alérgica é basicamente classificada de acordo com os antígenos causadores, tipos de doença, peridiocidade e gravidade dos sintomas. Objetivo Avaliar os tipos clínicos e a abordagem terapêutica individualizada para cada tipo de rinite alérgica e determinar o método de tratamento ideal utilizando várias terapias de combinação de fármacos. Método Um total de 108 participantes com rinite alérgica foram divididos em três grupos com base nos sintomas. Posteriormente, cada grupo foi subsequentemente categorizado em quatro subgrupos com base nos medicamentos recebidos. A eficácia dos tratamentos foi avaliada utilizando os escores da escala visual analógica EVA dos sintomas nasais totais e individualmente, índice de declínio do escore de sintomas, níveis de histamina e leucotrienos e níveis de expressão de mRNA e proteína dos receptores de histamina 1 e cisteinil-leucotrieno 1. Resultados As associações entre loratadina + furoato de mometasona, assim como a de loratadina + furoato de mometasona + montelucaste melhoraram significativamente o sintoma de espirros e reduziram os níveis de histamina em comparação às outras terapias combinadas (p < 0,05). Por outro lado, a associação montelucaste + furoato de mometasona, assim como a associação montelucaste + furoato de mometasone + loratadina melhoraram consideravelmente o sintoma de obstrução nasal e diminuíram os níveis de leucotrieno D4 em comparação com as outras combinações (p < 0,05). Conclusão A avaliação clínica dos sintomas combinada com a detecção experimental dos níveis de histamina e leucotrieno pode ser um método objetivo e preciso para classificar clinicamente os tipos de rinite alérgica. Além disso, o tratamento individualizado baseado na classificação da rinite alérgica pode resultar no aumento da eficácia do tratamento.

Ameliorative Effect of Hesperidin Against Motion Sickness by Modulating Histamine and Histamine H1 Receptor Expression.

Motion sickness (MS) is the visceral discomfort caused due to contradicting visual and vestibular inputs to the brain leading to nausea and vomiting. Sensory conflict theory which proves histamine elevations as the primary reason for MS provides a path for an effective pharmaco-therapy. We aimed to evaluate the anti-MS effect of hesperidin (HSP) by modulating histamine and histamine receptor H1 (HRH1) expression. The inhibitory effect of HSP on histamine release was studied in KU812 cells treated with 10 µM calcium ionophore. The in vivo anti-MS effect of HSP was evaluated in Balb/c mice. Thirty six mice were divided into six groups namely, normal control (NC, no rotation), hesperidin at 80 mg/kg body weight control (HSP80, no rotation), motion sickness (MS, rotation induced), dimenhydrinate (Standard drug) at 20 mg/kg body weight + rotation (STD + MS), hesperidin at 40 mg/kg body weight + rotation (HSP40 + MS) and hesperidin at 80 mg/kg body weight + rotation (HSP80 + MS). Hypothalamus and brainstem samples were analysed for histamine levels and HRH1 expression by RT-PCR, Western blot and immunohistochemistry analysis. Calcium ionophore treated KU812 cells significantly increased histamine release when compared to control cells. Pre-treatment with HSP inhibited histamine, HRH1 mRNA and protein expression. Histamine, HRH1 mRNA and protein expression in hypothalamus and brainstem samples of MS group increased significantly when compared to the NC group. Pre-treatment with HSP significantly reduced histamine, HRH1 mRNA and protein expression. Thus, indicating that HSP has a potent anti- MS effect by decreasing the elevated levels of histamine, HRH1 mRNA and protein expression in hypothalamus and brainstem regions.

Individualized treatment for allergic rhinitis based on key nasal clinical manifestations combined with histamine and leukotriene D4 levels.

INTRODUCTION: The types of allergic rhinitis are roughly classified based on the causative antigens, disease types, predilection time, and symptom severity. OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical typing and individualized treatment approach for allergic rhinitis and to determine the optimal treatment method for this disease using various drug combination therapies. METHODS: A total of 108 participants with allergic rhinitis were divided into three groups based on symptoms. Subsequently, each group was further categorized into four subgroups based on the medications received. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated using the visual analog scale VAS scores of the total and individual nasal symptoms, decline index of the symptom score, histamine and leukotriene levels, and mRNA and protein expression levels of histamine 1 and cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptors. RESULTS: Loratadine+mometasone furoate and loratadine+mometasone furoate+montelukast significantly improved the sneezing symptom and reduced the histamine levels compared with the other combination therapies (p<0.05). Meanwhile, montelukast+mometasone furoate and montelukast+mometasone furoate+loratadine considerably improved the nasal obstruction symptom and decreased the leukotriene D4 levels compared with the other combination therapies (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Clinical symptom evaluation combined with experimental detection of histamine and leukotriene levels can be an objective and accurate method to clinically classify the allergic rhinitis types. Furthermore, individualized treatment based on allergic rhinitis classification can result in a good treatment efficacy.

Upregulation of histamine receptor H1 promotes tumor progression and contributes to poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

H1 histamine receptor (H1HR) belongs to the family of rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptors. Recent studies have shown that H1HR expression is increased in several types of cancer. However, its functional roles in tumor progression remain largely unknown, especially in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We found that H1HR is frequently unregulated in HCC, which is significantly associated with both recurrence-free survival and overall survival in HCC patients. Functional experiments revealed that H1HR promoted both the growth and metastasis of HCC cells by inducing cell cycle progression, formation of lamellipodia, production of matrix metalloproteinase 2, and suppression of cell apoptosis. Activation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase A was found to be involved in H1HR-mediated HCC cell growth and metastasis. In addition, we found that overexpression of H1HR was mainly due to the downregulation of miR-940 in HCC cells. Moreover, the H1HR inhibitor terfenadine significantly suppressed tumor growth and metastasis in an HCC xenograft nude mice model. Our findings demonstrate that H1HR plays a critical role in the growth and metastasis of HCC cells, which provides experimental evidence supporting H1HR as a potential drug target for the treatment of HCC.

Interleukin-1 and histamine are essential for inducing nickel allergy in mice.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that (a) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a potent adjuvant for inducing Nickel (Ni) allergy in mice at both the sensitization and elicitation steps, (b) LPS induces Interleukin-1 (IL-1) and histidine decarboxylase (HDC, the histamine-forming enzyme), and IL-1 induces HDC, (c) Ni allergy is induced in mast cell-deficient, but not IL-1-deficient (IL-1-KO) or HDC-KO mice. OBJECTIVE: To examine the roles of IL-1 and HDC (or histamine) and their interrelationship during the establishment of Ni allergy. METHODS: Ni (NiCl2 ) 1 mmol/L containing IL-1ß and/or histamine was injected intraperitoneally (sensitization step). Ten days later, test substance(s) were intradermally injected into ear pinnas (elicitation step), and ear swelling was measured. RESULTS: In wild-type mice, Ni + LPS or Ni + IL-1ß injection at sensitization step followed by Ni alone at elicitation step induced Ni allergy. In IL-1-KO, injection of Ni + IL-1ß (but not Ni + histamine) was required at both sensitization and elicitation steps to induce Ni allergy. In HDC-KO, Ni + IL-1ß + histamine at sensitization step followed by Ni + histamine at elicitation step induced Ni allergy. In histamine H1 receptor-deficient mice, IL-1ß induced HDC, but was ineffective as an adjuvant for inducing Ni allergy. In wild-type mice, injection into ear pinnas of Ni 10 mmol/L alone or Ni 1 mmol/L + LPS induced IL-1ß, HDC and a prolonged swelling of ear pinnas. In non-sensitized mice, injection of IL-1ß by itself into ear pinnas in IL-1-KO mice induced prolonged ear swelling. Ni augmented IL-1 production (both IL-1α and IL-1ß) and HDC induction in wild-type mice sensitized to Ni. CONCLUSIONS: In mice: (a) for inducing Ni allergy, IL-1 is essential at both the sensitization and elicitation steps, and HDC induction is involved in the effect of IL-1, (b) stimulation of H1 receptor is also essential for inducing Ni allergy at both sensitization and elicitation steps, and (c) the 'sensitization to Ni' state may be a state where tissues are primed for augmented production of IL-1α and/or IL-1ß in response to Ni. (within 300 words, now 300).

Rab46 integrates Ca2+ and histamine signaling to regulate selective cargo release from Weibel-Palade bodies.

Endothelial cells selectively release cargo stored in Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs) to regulate vascular function, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we show that histamine evokes the release of the proinflammatory ligand, P-selectin, while diverting WPBs carrying non-inflammatory cargo away from the plasma membrane to the microtubule organizing center. This differential trafficking is dependent on Rab46 (CRACR2A), a newly identified Ca2+-sensing GTPase, which localizes to a subset of P-selectin-negative WPBs. After acute stimulation of the H1 receptor, GTP-bound Rab46 evokes dynein-dependent retrograde transport of a subset of WPBs along microtubules. Upon continued histamine stimulation, Rab46 senses localized elevations of intracellular calcium and evokes dispersal of microtubule organizing center-clustered WPBs. These data demonstrate for the first time that a Rab GTPase, Rab46, integrates G protein and Ca2+ signals to couple on-demand histamine signals to selective WPB trafficking.

Loratadine, an H1 Antihistamine, Inhibits Melanogenesis in Human Melanocytes.

It has long been believed that histamine is associated with cutaneous melanogenesis. Specifically, H2-receptor antagonists reportedly inhibit melanogenesis, but H1-receptor antagonists, which are some of the most commonly prescribed medicines in dermatology, have not been studied to determine whether and how they regulate melanogenesis. Therefore, we screened H1-receptor antagonists to determine whether they inhibit melanogenesis and found that loratadine was particularly effective, in this regard without compromising cellular viability. Loratadine downregulated microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) and tyrosinase in melanocytes. To determine the intracellular signaling pathways, Akt was consistently activated by loratadine. PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor, LY294002, restored the reduced melanin content that was induced by loratadine. In addition, phospho-GSK-3ß also was found to be increased following loratadine treatment. Loratadine reduced the amount of PKC-ßII in the membrane fraction, thereby decreasing its activity. Taken together, our data indicate that loratadine regulates melanogenesis via Akt/MITF and PKC-ßII signaling, thereby leading to the inhibition of melanogenic proteins. The antimelanogenic effects of loratadine have potentially significant and useful roles in dermatologic practice, although further clinical studies will be required to test this.

Suppression of IFN-γ Production in Murine Splenocytes by Histamine Receptor Antagonists.

Accumulating evidence suggests that histamine synthesis induced in several types of tumor tissues modulates tumor immunity. We found that a transient histamine synthesis was induced in CD11b⁺Gr-1⁺ splenocytes derived from BALB/c mice transplanted with a syngeneic colon carcinoma, CT-26, when they were co-cultured with CT-26 cells. Significant levels of IFN-γ were produced under this co-culture condition. We explored the modulatory roles of histamine on IFN-γ production and found that several histamine receptor antagonists, such as pyrilamine, diphenhydramine, JNJ7777120, and thioperamide, could significantly suppress IFN-γ production. However, suppression of IFN-γ production by these antagonists was also found when splenocytes were derived from the Hdc-/- BALB/c mice. Suppressive effects of these antagonists were found on IFN-γ production induced by concanavalin A or the combination of an anti-CD3 antibody and an anti-CD28 antibody in a histamine-independent manner. Murine splenocytes were found to express H1 and H2 receptors, but not H3 and H4 receptors. IFN-γ production in the Hh1r-/- splenocytes induced by the combination of an anti-CD3 antibody and an anti-CD28 antibody was significantly suppressed by these antagonists. These findings suggest that pyrilamine, diphenhydramine, JNJ7777120, and thioperamide can suppress IFN-γ production in activated splenocytes in a histamine-independent manner.

Effects of irradiation with narrowband-ultraviolet B on up-regulation of histamine H1 receptor mRNA and induction of apoptosis in HeLa cells and nasal mucosa of rats.

Narrowband-ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Previously, we reported that irradiation with 200 mJ/cm2 of 310 nm NB-UVB suppressed phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA)-induced up-regulation of histamine H1 receptor (H1R) gene expression without induction of apoptosis in HeLa cells. However, the effect of NB-UVB irradiation on nasal symptoms is still unclear. Here, we show that low dose irradiation with 310 nm NB-UVB alleviates nasal symptoms in toluene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI)-sensitized allergy model rats. Irradiation with 310 nm NB-UVB suppressed PMA-induced H1R mRNA up-regulation in HeLa cells dose-dependently at doses of 75-200 mJ/cm2 and reversibly at a dose of 150 mJ/cm2 without induction of apoptosis. While, at doses of more than 200 mJ/cm2, irradiation with 310 nm NB-UVB induced apoptosis. Western blot analysis showed that the suppressive effect of NB-UVB irradiation on H1R gene expression was through the inhibition of ERK phosphorylation. In TDI-sensitized rat, intranasal irradiation with 310 nm NB-UVB at an estimated dose of 100 mJ/cm2 once a day for three days suppressed TDI-induced sneezes and up-regulation of H1R mRNA in nasal mucosa without induction of apoptosis. These findings suggest that repeated intranasal irradiation with low dose of NB-UVB could be clinically used as phototherapy of AR.

Regulation of apolipoprotein A-I gene expression by the histamine H1 receptor: Requirement for NF-κB.

AIMS: Earlier it had been found by us that apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I) is suppressed by histamine in HepG2 cells. Histamine has been shown to regulate NF-κB activity, though not in hepatocytes. Therefore we examined the role of the histamine receptors and NF-κB in histamine-mediated apo A-I gene expression in HepG2 liver cells. MAIN METHODS: The effect of histamine on histamine H1 receptor expression, and NF-κB p65 and p50 subunits was examined by Western blot. Histamine H1 receptor involvement was examined by loss-of-function (via siRNA) and gain-of-function studies overexpressing the histamine H1 receptor. The requirement for the p65 subunit of NF-κB for histamines effect was elucidated by loss-of-function studies (siRNA). Finally, the effect of histamine on NF-κB binding to the apo A-I gene promoter was examined by chromatin immunoprecipitation. KEY FINDINGS: Treatment of HepG2 cells with histamine had no effect on histamine H1 receptor expression. However, treatment with histamine increased NF-κB p65 and p50 subunit expression significantly. At low levels, the exogenous histamine H1 receptor plasmid suppressed apo A-I gene promoter activity while addition of higher levels of plasmid DNA actually increased apo A-I gene promoter activity. Inhibition of NF-κB activity with SN50 prevented histamine from repressing apo A-I promoter activity as did silencing p65 expression via siRNA. Finally, treatment with histamine increased binding of the p65 subunit of NF-κB to the apo A-I gene promoter. SIGNIFICANCE: Histamine suppresses apo A-I gene expression in hepatocytes via the histamine H1 receptor by elevating NF-κB expression and binding to the apo A-I promoter.