A novel peptide antagonist of the human growth hormone receptor.

Excess circulating human growth hormone (hGH) in vivo is linked to metabolic and growth disorders such as cancer, diabetes, and acromegaly. Consequently, there is considerable interest in developing antagonists of hGH action. Here, we present the design, synthesis, and characterization of a 16-residue peptide (site 1-binding helix [S1H]) that inhibits hGH-mediated STAT5 phosphorylation in cultured cells. S1H was designed as a direct sequence mimetic of the site 1 mini-helix (residues 36-51) of wild-type hGH and acts by inhibiting the interaction of hGH with the human growth hormone receptor (hGHR). In vitro studies indicated that S1H is stable in human serum and can adopt an α-helix in solution. Our results also show that S1H mitigates phosphorylation of STAT5 in cells co-treated with hGH, reducing intracellular STAT5 phosphorylation levels to those observed in untreated controls. Furthermore, S1H was found to attenuate the activity of the hGHR and the human prolactin receptor, suggesting that this peptide acts as an antagonist of both lactogenic and somatotrophic hGH actions. Finally, we used alanine scanning to determine how discrete amino acids within the S1H sequence contribute to its structural organization and biological activity. We observed a strong correlation between helical propensity and inhibitory effect, indicating that S1H-mediated antagonism of the hGHR is largely dependent on the ability for S1H to adopt an α-helix. Taken together, these results show that S1H not only acts as a novel peptide-based antagonist of the hGHR but can also be applied as a chemical tool to study the molecular nature of hGH-hGHR interactions.

Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus.

The 13th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was held in November 2019 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and comprised acromegaly experts including endocrinologists and neurosurgeons who considered optimal approaches for multidisciplinary acromegaly management. Focused discussions reviewed techniques, results, and side effects of surgery, radiotherapy, and medical therapy, and how advances in technology and novel techniques have changed the way these modalities are used alone or in combination. Effects of treatment on patient outcomes were considered, along with strategies for optimizing and personalizing therapeutic approaches. Expert consensus recommendations emphasize how best to implement available treatment options as part of a multidisciplinary approach at Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence.

Hippocampal growth hormone modulates relational memory and the dendritic spine density in CA1.

Growth hormone (GH) deficiency is associated with cognitive decline which occur both in normal aging and in endocrine disorders. Several brain areas express receptors for GH although their functional role is unclear. To determine how GH affects the capacity for learning and memory by specific actions in one of the key areas, the hippocampus, we injected recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs) in male rats to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) combined with either GH, antagonizing GH (aGH), or no hormone, in the dorsal CA1. We found that aGH disrupted memory in the Morris water maze task, and that aGH treated animals needed more training to relearn a novel goal location. In a one-trial spontaneous location recognition test, the GH treated rats had better memory performance for object locations than the two other groups. Histological examinations revealed that GH increased the dendritic spine density on apical dendrites of CA1, while aGH reduced the spine density. GH increased the relative amount of immature spines, while aGH decreased the same amount. Our results imply that GH is a neuromodulator with strong influence over hippocampal plasticity and relational memory by mechanisms involving modulation of dendritic spines. The findings are significant to the increasing aging population and GH deficiency patients.

Long-term safety and treatment outcomes of pegvisomant in Japanese patients with acromegaly: results from the post-marketing surveillance.

This post-marketing surveillance is to investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant, which is used in patients with acromegaly in routine clinical practice. This surveillance included all cases treated with pegvisomant during the study period from the start of marketing (June 5, 2007) to December 2015. Data for 251 patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant were collected from 119 institutions nationwide in Japan. Eighty-five patients received pegvisomant monotherapy throughout their treatment, while 165 patients were treated with somatostatin analogue or dopamine agonist in combination with pegvisomant. Mean dose of pegvisomant was 10.6 ± 6.1 mg/day in the entire treatment period (except for initial loading dose). The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 35.6% (89/250). No new safety concerns related to long-term treatment were observed. The major investigation items of incidence of abnormal liver function and tumor enlargement were 16.0% (40/250), and 5.2% (13/250) respectively. Efficacy at the final evaluation point was 96.4% (217/225) based on the overall clinical judgement of attending physicians, and efficacy in each observation period was over 94%. Improvement in IGF-I levels and clinical symptoms scores were also observed by comparing the data at baseline with each observation point during treatment. IGF-I normalization rate was 68.2% at 5 years. Pegvisomant monotherapy showed similar improvement here as well. These results suggest that long-term treatment with pegvisomant is effective in clinical practice.

Growth hormone receptor promotes osteosarcoma cell growth and metastases.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents, with a high incidence of lung metastasis and poor prognosis. Here, we report that growth hormone receptor (GHR) is overexpressed in OS samples compared with osteofibrous dysplasia. We subsequently demonstrated that GHR knockdown inhibited colony formation, promoted cell apoptosis and decreased the number of cells at G2/M phase in 143B and U2OS cells. Furthermore, knockdown of GHR inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Together, these findings indicate that GHR modulates cell proliferation and metastasis through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway and may be suitable for use as a putative biomarker of OS.

Plasma Agouti-Related Protein Levels in Acromegaly and Effects of Surgical or Pegvisomant Therapy.

CONTEXT: GH activates agouti-related protein (AgRP) neurons, leading to orexigenic responses in mice. The relationship between serum GH and plasma AgRP, which has been shown to reflect hypothalamic AgRP, has not been evaluated in humans. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that central stimulatory actions of GH on hypothalamic AgRP could be reflected in plasma AgRP in acromegaly. METHODS: We studied 23 patients with active acromegaly before and for ≤2 years after surgical (n = 13) or GH receptor antagonist therapy with pegvisomant (n = 10), and 100 healthy subjects with morning fasting blood samples for AgRP, leptin, GH, and IGF-1 and anthropometric measurements. RESULTS: The plasma AgRP levels were higher in those with active acromegaly than in the matched healthy subjects [median, 100 pg/mL; interquartile range (IQR), 78 to 139 pg/mL vs median, 63 pg/mL; IQR, 58 to 67 pg/mL; P < 0.0001]. Plasma AgRP decreased from before to after surgery (median, 102 pg/mL; IQR, 82 to 124 pg/mL vs median, 63 pg/mL; IQR, 55.6 to 83 pg/mL; P = 0.0024) and from before to during pegvisomant therapy (median, 97 pg/mL; IQR, 77 to 175 pg/mL vs median, 63; IQR, 61 to 109 pg/mL; P = 0.006). The plasma AgRP level correlated with GH (r = 0.319; P = 0.011) and IGF-1 (r = 0.292; P = 0.002). In repeated measure analysis, AgRP was significantly associated with IGF-1. CONCLUSIONS: Our data have provided evidence of a stimulatory effect of GH on plasma AgRP in humans. The levels were greater in active acromegaly and decreased in parallel with GH and IGF-1 decreases with acromegaly treatment. Data from mice suggest that AgRP may mediate some of the known effects of GH on energy metabolism. This warrants further study in patients with acromegaly and other populations.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly.

Acromegaly is associated with high morbidity and elevated mortality when not adequately treated. Surgery is the first-line treatment for most patients as it is the only one that can lead to immediate cure. In patients who are not cured by surgery, treatment is currently based on a trial-and-error approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are initiated for most patients, although approximately 25% of patients present resistance to this drug class. Some biomarkers of treatment outcome are described in the literature, with the aim of categorizing patients into different groups to individualize their treatments using a personalized approach. In this review, we will discuss the current status of precision medicine for the treatment of acromegaly and future perspectives on the use of personalized medicine for this purpose.

Growth Hormone Receptor Knockdown Sensitizes Human Melanoma Cells to Chemotherapy by Attenuating Expression of ABC Drug Efflux Pumps.

Melanoma remains one of the most therapy-resistant forms of human cancer despite recent introductions of highly efficacious targeted therapies. The intrinsic therapy resistance of human melanoma is largely due to abundant expression of a repertoire of xenobiotic efflux pumps of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family. Here, we report that GH action is a key mediator of chemotherapeutic resistance in human melanoma cells. We investigated multiple ABC efflux pumps (ABCB1, ABCB5, ABCB8, ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCG1, and ABCG2) reportedly associated with melanoma drug resistance in different human melanoma cells and tested the efficacy of five different anti-cancer compounds (cisplatin, doxorubicin, oridonin, paclitaxel, vemurafenib) with decreased GH action. We found that GH treatment of human melanoma cells upregulates expression of multiple ABC transporters and increases the EC50 of melanoma drug vemurafenib. Also, vemurafenib-resistant melanoma cells had upregulated levels of GH receptor (GHR) expression as well as ABC efflux pumps. GHR knockdown (KD) using siRNA in human melanoma cells treated with sub-EC50 doses of anti-tumor compounds resulted in significantly increased drug retention, decreased cell proliferation and increased drug efficacy, compared to mock-transfected controls. Our set of findings identify an unknown mechanism of GH regulation in mediating melanoma drug resistance and validates GHR as a unique therapeutic target for sensitizing highly therapy-resistant human melanoma cells to lower doses of anti-cancer drugs.

Pregnancy and acromegaly.

INTRODUCTION: Acromegaly is a rare disorder in which, due to the high incidence of secondary hypogonadism, pregnancies are relatively rare. However, some women with acromegaly do get pregnant, which brings along questions about medication, complications and follow-up. This review tries to address these issues and provide the reader with practical information. METHODS: This review summarizes published data. CONCLUSIONS: Acromegaly is a disorder that is characterized by changes in growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin concentrations and actions. All these hormones are important in pregnancy as well. In principle, the fetal-placental collaboration between mother and child more-or-less takes over the control over GH and IGF-1, not only in normal physiology but also to a certain extend in acromegaly. When medication for the high GH levels or actions is continued during pregnancy, both dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs and GH receptor antagonists have been used and the available data suggest that there are no adverse consequences on mother or fetus to date. However, it is strongly advised to stop any medical intervention during pregnancy until more data are available on the safety of these compounds. Also, medical treatment is not needed as tumor size and disease activity are not reported to escape.

Pegvisomant: a growth hormone receptor antagonist used in the treatment of acromegaly.

PURPOSE: To review published data on pegvisomant and its therapeutic role in acromegaly. METHODS: Electronic searches of the published literature were conducted using the keywords: acromegaly, growth hormone (GH) receptor (antagonist), pegvisomant, therapy. Relevant articles (n = 141) were retrieved and considered for inclusion in this manuscript. RESULTS: Pegvisomant is a genetically engineered, recombinant growth hormone receptor antagonist, which is effective in normalizing serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels in the majority of patients with acromegaly and ameliorating symptoms and signs associated with GH excess. Pegvisomant does not have direct antiproliferative effects on the underlying somatotroph pituitary adenoma, which is the etiology of GH excess in the vast majority of patients with acromegaly. Therefore, patients receiving pegvisomant monotherapy require regular pituitary imaging in order to monitor for possible increase in tumor size. Adverse events in patients on pegvisomant therapy include skin rashes, lipohypertrophy at injection sites, and idiosyncratic liver toxicity (generally asymptomatic transaminitis that is reversible upon drug discontinuation), thus necessitating regular patient monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Pegvisomant is an effective therapeutic agent in patients with acromegaly who are not in remission after undergoing pituitary surgery. It mitigates excess GH action, as demonstrated by IGF-1 normalization, but has no direct effects on pituitary tumors causing acromegaly. Regular surveillance for possible tumor growth and adverse effects (hepatotoxicity, skin manifestations) is warranted.

The role of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly.

PURPOSE: Uncontrolled acromegaly results in approximately 2-fold excess mortality. Pituitary surgery is first-line therapy, and medical treatment is indicated for persistent disease. While cabergoline and pegvisomant are used in select patients, somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) remain the cornerstone of medical treatment. Management of patients poorly responsive to SRLs is therefore, challenging. The purpose of this review is to highlight the options for combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly, with an emphasis on efficacy and safety. METHODS: All original articles/abstracts detailing combination medical therapy in acromegaly were identified from a PubMed search. RESULTS: Studies reviewed included retrospective and open-label prospective studies. While the combination of SRL and cabergoline was generally well tolerated, a lower baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level was the best predictor of efficacy; this combination may be most effective in patients with mildly elevated IGF-1. SRL-pegvisomant combination normalized IGF-1 in the majority of patients; continued efficacy despite individual drug dosing reduction was also reported. The risk of significant liver enzyme elevation was, however, higher than that reported with SRL monotherapy; close monitoring is recommended. Data on pegvisomant-cabergoline combination is limited, but this may be an option in the setting of SRL intolerance. Reports on temozolomide used in combination with other medical therapies in patients with aggressive GH-secreting tumors are also summarized. CONCLUSION: While more prospective, randomized controlled trials on long-term efficacy and safety are needed, combination medical therapy remains a treatment strategy that should be considered for acromegaly patients poorly responsive to SRLs.

Growth hormone receptor antagonism suppresses tumour regrowth after radiotherapy in an endometrial cancer xenograft model.

Human GH expression is associated with poor survival outcomes for endometrial cancer patients, enhanced oncogenicity of endometrial cancer cells and reduced sensitivity to ionising radiation in vitro, suggesting that GH is a potential target for anticancer therapy. However, whether GH receptor inhibition sensitises to radiotherapy in vivo has not been tested. In the current study, we evaluated whether the GH receptor antagonist, pegvisomant (Pfizer), sensitises to radiotherapy in vivo in an endometrial tumour xenograft model. Subcutaneous administration of pegvisomant (20 or 100 mg/kg/day, s.c.) reduced serum IGF1 levels by 23% and 68%, respectively, compared to vehicle treated controls. RL95-2 xenografts grown in immunodeficient NIH-III mice were treated with vehicle or pegvisomant (100 mg/kg/day), with or without fractionated gamma radiation (10 × 2.5 Gy over 5 days). When combined with radiation, pegvisomant significantly increased the median time tumours took to reach 3× the pre-radiation treatment volume (49 days versus 72 days; p = 0.001). Immunohistochemistry studies demonstrated that 100 mg/kg pegvisomant every second day was sufficient to abrogate MAP Kinase signalling throughout the tumour. In addition, treatment with pegvisomant increased hypoxic regions in irradiated tumours, as determined by immunohistochemical detection of pimonidazole adducts, and decreased the area of CD31 labelling in unirradiated tumours, suggesting an anti-vascular effect. Pegvisomant did not affect intratumoral staining for HIF1α, VEGF-A, CD11b, or phospho-EGFR. Our results suggest that blockade of the human GH receptor may improve the response of GH and/or IGF1-responsive endometrial tumours to radiation.

Pituitary gigantism: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary gigantism (PG) is a rare pediatric disease with poorly defined long-term outcomes. Our aim is to describe the longitudinal clinical course in PG patients using a single-center, retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients younger than 19 years diagnosed with PG were identified. Thirteen cases were confirmed based on histopathology of a GH secreting adenoma or hyperplasia and a height >2 SD for age and gender. Laboratory studies, initial pathology, and imaging were abstracted. RESULTS: Average age at diagnosis was 13 years with an average initial tumor size of 7.4×3.8 mm. Initial transsphenoidal surgery was curative in 3/12 patients. Four of the nine patients who failed the initial surgery required a repeat procedure. Octreotide successfully normalized GH levels in 1/6 patients with disease refractory to surgery (1/6). Two out of five patients received pegvisomant after failing octreotide but only one patient responded to treatment. Five patients were ultimately treated with radiosurgery or radiation patients were followed for an average of 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: PG is difficult to treat. In most patients, the initial transsphenoidal surgery failed to normalize GH levels. If the initial surgery was unsuccessful, repeat surgery was unlikely to control GH secretion. Treatment with octreotide or pegvisomant was successful in less than half the patients failing surgery. Radiosurgery was curative, but is not an optimal treatment for pediatric patients. Despite the small sample, our study suggests that the treatment outcome of pediatric PG may be different than adults.

Long-term treatment with pegvisomant for acromegaly: a 10-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant (PEG) has differed between preclinical and observational studies mainly due to dose adjustment and IGF-I normalization criteria. An escape phenomenon has also been described, but its definition and underlying causes have not been fully established. OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate the outcomes of long-term PEG in a series of previously published patients and analyse the escape phenomenon. METHODS: We reviewed all patients with acromegaly resistant to SSA in whom PEG was started as monotherapy, who had been included in a previous publication. We prospectively evaluated 64 (56·3% women) from six tertiary care referral hospitals in Spain, for whom data as of June 2014 were available. Escape to PEG was defined as confirmed loss of biochemical control (IGF-I >1·2xULN), after at least 6 months of previous control with a stable dose of PEG. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for 13·0 (5·9-34·8) years since diagnosis, and 9·0 (4·1-10·4) years since the first administration of PEG. Fifty-one (89·5%) patients had an adequate IGF-I control at the last follow-up visit, 9 of them without treatment. Tumour growth was reported in 6 of 64 cases (9·4%), none of whom had received prior radiotherapy (P = 0·011). Seven patients died during follow-up. We found 16 escapes in 10 patients (15·6%). We identified potential underlying causes in 9 cases (tumour regrowth, previous treatment modifications, concomitant menopause and change in testosterone administration). The reason was unknown in 7 escapes, which occurred in 6 patients (9·4%). All patients, except one, achieved subsequent biochemical control after treatment adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: We reassure the efficacy and safety of long-term PEG. An escape phenomenon may occur, but it can be overcome by adjusting therapy.

Current therapies and mortality in acromegaly.

UNLABELLED: Acromegaly is a rare disease most frequently due to a GH secreting pituitary adenoma. Without an appropriate therapy, life of patients with acromegaly can be shortened with ten years. Pituitary surgery is usually the first line therapy for GH secreting pituitary adenomas. A meta-analysis proved that mortality is much lower in operated patients, even uncured, than the entire group of patients and is similar with the general population in patients with GH<1 µg/ L. For the patients with hypersecreting postoperative remnant tumor, those with low chance of surgical cure or with life-threatening comorbidities, medical therapies are available: somatostatin receptor analogues (SRA), dopamine agonists (DA) and GH receptor antagonists. Studies with >30% utilization of SRAs reported a lower mortality ratio than studies with lower percentages of SRA administration. Although therapy with DA has long been used in patients with acromegaly, there are no studies reporting its effect on mortality, but its efficacy is limited by the low remission rate obtained. The use of conventional external radiotherapy, although with good remission rate in time, was linked with increased mortality, mostly due to cerebrovascular diseases. CONCLUSION: Mortality in acromegaly can be reduced to expected levels from general population by using modern therapies either in monotherapy or by using multimodal approaches in experienced centers.

Pegvisomant treatment in patients with acromegaly in clinical practice: The French ACROSTUDY.

OBJECTIVE: To monitor long-term pegvisomant treatment of patients with acromegaly in routine clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The French ACROSTUDY is part of the global ACROSTUDY, an observational post-authorization safety surveillance study of acromegaly treatment with pegvisomant. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up of the 292 included patients was 5.2 years. Overall 272 (93%) patients received somatostatin analogues before initiation of pegvisomant. The most prescribed initial dose of pegvisomant (after possible administration of a loading dose) was 10mg/day and, starting from the 2nd year, the median dose was 20mg/day. Serum IGF-1 concentration decreased as soon as pegvisomant was started and after 5 years there was a 62% mean decrease in serum IGF-1 concentration. The percentage of patients with serum IGF-1 concentration within normal ranges (for age and sex) of the local laboratory shifted from 11% at start of pegvisomant to 43% at 6 months and 63% after 5 years. The last available imaging (242 patients) showed an increased or decreased tumor size in 4 and 10% of patients, respectively. Mean weight increased by 3 kg over the 5-year period (P<10(-3)). Mean fasting blood glucose significantly decreased over time (P<0.05), while HbA1c level remained unchanged. Tolerance profile was generally good and similar to that described in clinical studies. CONCLUSION: This analysis showed a significant decrease in IGF-1 levels throughout the follow-up period, and confirmed that pegvisomant treatment is safe in acromegaly. The results of this interim analysis remain to be confirmed by the final analysis.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of preoperative treatment of acromegaly with somatostatin analogue on surgical outcome.

CONTEXT: There is no uniform standard of care for acromegaly. Due to the high costs involved, steps must be taken to ensure the cost-effective delivery of treatment. OBJECTIVE: Taking the results of an earlier meta-analysis as a starting point, this study aims to determine whether treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogue (SSA) prior to surgery improves the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of acromegaly. METHODS: The results are presented as an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) immediately after surgery, for the following year and over the next four decades. The cure rates percentage (95% CI) for the three randomized prospective controlled trials were 44.4% (34.2-54.7) and 18.2% (10.1-26.3) for preoperative treated and untreated patients respectively. The cost of pharmacological treatments was based on the number of units prescribed, dose and length of treatment. RESULTS: The mean (95% CI) ICER immediately after surgery was €17,548 (12,007-33,250). In terms of the postoperative SSA treatment, the ICER changes from positive to negative before two years after surgery. One decade after surgery the ICER per patient/year was €-9973 (-18,798; -6752) for postoperative SSA treatment and €-31,733 (-59,812; -21,483) in the case of postoperative pegvisomant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In centres without optimal surgical results, preoperative treatment of GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas with SSA not only shows a significant improvement in the surgical results, but is also highly cost-effective, with an ICER per patient/year one decade after surgery, of between €-9973 (-18,798; -6752) and €-31,733 (-59,812; -21,483) for SSA and pegvisomant respectively.

A male patient with acromegaly and breast cancer: treating acromegaly to control tumor progression.

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly is a rare disease associated with an increased risk of developing cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 72-year-old man who was diagnosed with acromegaly (IGF-1 770 ng/ml) and breast cancer. Four years before he suffered from a colon-rectal cancer. Pituitary surgery and octreotide-LAR treatment failed to control acromegaly. Normalization of IGF-1 (97 ng/ml) was obtained with pegvisomant therapy. Four years after breast cancer surgery, 2 pulmonary metastases were detected at chest CT. The patient was started on anastrozole, but, contrary to medical advice, he stopped pegvisomant treatment (IGF-I 453 ng/ml). Four months later, chest CT revealed an increase in size of the metastatic lesion of the left lung. The patient was shifted from anastrozole to tamoxifen and was restarted on pegvisomant, with normalization of serum IGF-1 levels (90 ng/ml). Four months later, a reduction in size of the metastatic lesion of the left lung was detected by CT. Subsequent CT scans throughout a 24-month follow-up showed a further reduction in size and then a stabilization of the metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a male patient with acromegaly and breast cancer. The clinical course of breast cancer was closely related to the metabolic control of acromegaly. The rapid progression of metastatic lesion was temporally related to stopping pegvisomant treatment and paralleled a rise in serum IGF-1 levels. Normalization of IGF-1 after re-starting pegvisomant impressively reduced the progression of metastatic breast lesions. Control of acromegaly is mandatory in acromegalic patients with cancer.

Poorly-controlled acromegaly accompanied by subclinical adrenal Cushing's syndrome after surgery for multiple endocrine tumors.

A 48-year-old woman diagnosed with acromegaly 21 years earlier presented at our hospital with a left adrenal tumor. Her medical history included breast cancer, thyroid cancer and an incompletely resected growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenoma. Endocrinological and radiological examinations revealed subclinical adrenal Cushing's syndrome. She subsequently underwent left adrenalectomy, followed by glucocorticoid replacement therapy. Her GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels were insufficiently controlled, and pegvisomant was administered in addition to octreotide acetate. Following adrenalectomy, a giant hepatic hemangioma and papillary thyroid carcinoma in the residual right lobe developed, indicating the high risk of tumor development in patients with acromegaly.

Long-term treatment with pegvisomant as monotherapy in patients with acromegaly: experience from ACROSTUDY.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate use of pegvisomant, a growth hormone (GH) receptor antagonist, as monotherapy in ACROSTUDY, a global safety surveillance study set in 14 countries (373 sites). METHODS: A descriptive analysis of safety, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading, and treatment outcomes in 710 subjects who received at least 1 pegvisomant dose as monotherapy during and up to 5 years follow-up in ACROSTUDY. RESULTS: Subjects received a mean of 5.4 years of pegvisomant and were followed in ACROSTUDY for a mean of 3.8 years. A total of 1,255 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 345 subjects (48.6%). Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 133 (18.7%) subjects, including 22 deaths, none of which were attributed to pegvisomant use. Of 670 (94%) subjects with at least 1 liver function test (LFT) reported in ACROSTUDY, 8 (1.2%) had reported increases in transaminases >3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). No liver failure was reported. Based on central MRI reading, 12 of 542 subjects (2.2%) had a confirmed increase or increase/decrease in tumor size. Injection-site reactions were reported in 2.3%. At 5 years of therapy, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level was reported normal in 67.5% (mean dose 17.2 mg/day) and elevated in 29.9% (mean dose 19.8 mg/day). Subjects on 20 mg per day or more rose from 36% at 3 years to 41% at 5 years of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: ACROSTUDY data indicate that pegvisomant used as sole medical therapy is safe and effective for patients with acromegaly. The reported low incidence of pituitary tumor size increase and liver enzyme elevations are reassuring and support the positive benefit-risk of pegvisomant therapy.