Meta-Analysis of Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonists as the Treatment for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Corticosteroid is the first-line treatment for aGVHD, but its response rate is only approximately 50%. At present, no uniformly accepted treatment for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) is available. Blocking interleukin-2 receptors (IL-2Rs) on donor T cells using pharmaceutical antagonists alleviates SR-aGVHD. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of four commercially available IL-2R antagonists (IL-2RAs) in SR-aGVHD treatment. A total of 31 studies met the following inclusion criteria (1): patients of any race, any sex, and all ages (2); those diagnosed with SR-aGVHD after HSCT; and (3) those using IL-2RA-based therapy as the treatment for SR-aGVHD. The overall response rate (ORR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.87)] and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.54 (95% CI: 0.39-0.68) and denileukin diftitox 0.56 (95% CI: 0.35-0.76). The complete response rate (CRR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42-0.68) and 0.42 (95%CI: 0.29-0.56), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16-0.51) and denileukin diftitox 0.37 (95% CI: 0.24-0.52). The ORR and CRR were better after 1-month treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab than after treatment with inolimomab and denileukin diftitox. The incidence of the infection was higher after inolimomab treatment than after treatment with the other IL-2RAs. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs varied. The response rate of basiliximab was the highest, followed by that of daclizumab. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs.

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Following Kidney Transplantation: A Review.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is one of the most feared complications following kidney transplantation. Over a 10-year period, the risk of PTLD in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is 12-fold higher than in a matched nontransplanted population. Given the number of kidney transplants performed, KTRs who experience PTLD outnumber other organ transplant recipients who experience PTLD. Epstein-Barr virus infection is one of the most important risk factors for PTLD, even though 40% of PTLD cases in contemporary series are not Epstein-Barr virus-associated. The overall level of immunosuppression seems to be the most important driver of the increased occurrence of PTLD in solid organ transplant recipients. Reduction in immunosuppression is commonly accepted to prevent and treat PTLD. Although the cornerstone of PTLD treatment had been chemotherapy (typically cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristinr-prednisone), the availability of rituximab has changed the treatment landscape in the past 2 decades. The outcome of PTLD in KTRs has clearly improved as a result of the introduction of more uniform treatment protocols, improved supportive care, and increased awareness and use of positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography in staging and response monitoring. In this review, we will focus on the most recent data on epidemiology, presentation, risk factors, and management of PTLD in KTRs.

Antithymocyte Globulin Versus Interleukin-2 Receptor Antagonist in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at increased risks of rejection and graft failure. The optimal induction agent for this population remains controversial, particularly regarding concerns that antithymocyte globulin (ATG) might increase HCV-related complications. METHODS: Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare claims data, we studied 6780 HCV+ and 139 681 HCV- KT recipients in 1999-2016 who received ATG or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) for induction. We first examined the association of recipient HCV status with receiving ATG (versus IL2RA) using multilevel logistic regression. Then, we studied the association of ATG (versus IL2RA) with KT outcomes (rejection, graft failure, and death) and hepatic complications (liver transplant registration and cirrhosis) among HCV+ recipients using logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS: HCV+ recipients were less likely to receive ATG than HCV- recipients (living donor, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.640.770.91; deceased donor, aOR = 0.710.810.92). In contrast, HCV+ recipients who received ATG were at lower risk of acute rejection compared to those who received IL2RA (1-y crude incidence = 11.6% versus 12.6%; aOR = 0.680.820.99). There was no significant difference in the risks of graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.861.001.17), death (aHR = 0.850.951.07), liver transplant registration (aHR = 0.580.971.61), and cirrhosis (aHR = 0.730.921.16). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ATG, as compared to IL2RA, may lower the risk of acute rejection without increasing hepatic complications in HCV+ KT recipients. Given the higher rates of acute rejection in this population, ATG appears to be safe and reasonable for HCV+ recipients.

Immunological risk stratification and tailored minimisation of immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of minimisation of immunosuppression including early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients treated with Basiliximab induction remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reports the outcomes from 298 consecutive renal transplants performed since 1st July 2010-June 2013 treated with Basiliximab induction and early steroid withdrawal in low immunological risk patients using a simple immunological risk stratification and 3-month protocol biopsy to optimise therapy. The cohort comprised 225 low-risk patients (first transplant or HLA antibody calculated reaction frequency (CRF ≤50% with no donor specific HLA antibodies) who underwent basiliximab induction, steroid withdrawal on day 7 and maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and 73 high-risk patients who received tacrolimus, MMF and prednisolone for the first 3 months followed by long term maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus and prednisolone. High-risk patients not undergoing 3-month protocol biopsy were continued on triple immunosuppression. RESULTS: Steroid withdrawal could be safely achieved in low immunological risk recipients with IL2 receptor antibody induction. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 15.1% in the low-risk and 13.9% in the high-risk group (including sub-clinical rejection detected at protocol biopsy). One- year graft survival was 93.3% and patient survival 98.5% in the low-risk group, and 97.3 and 100% respectively in the high-risk group. Graft function was similar in each group at 1 year (mean eGFR 61.2 ± 23.4 mL/min low-risk and 64.6 ± 19.2 mL/min high-risk). CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression regimen comprising basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, MMF and prednisolone with early steroid withdrawal in low risk patients and MMF withdrawal in high risk patients following a normal 3-month protocol biopsy is effective in limiting acute rejection episodes and produces excellent rates of patient survival, graft function and complications.

Induction therapy with thymoglobulin or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist for Chinese recipients of living donor renal transplantation: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recipients of living donor renal transplantation are typically considered to have a relatively lower immunological risk. This retrospective study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety between rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) induction therapies in Chinese population. METHODS: A total of 188 patients receiving living donor renal transplantation between February 2004 and December 2013 were included and divided into the rATG group and based on their induction therapy. The primary outcome was clinically-suspected rejection. The incidences of de novo donor-specific antigen (dn-DSA), graft survival, and infection were also compared between groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the influential factors associated with clinically-suspected acute rejection and graft survival. RESULTS: The rATG group had a higher panel reactive antibody (PRA) score and more complete HLA mismatches than the IL2-RA group (both P < 0.001). The incidences of clinically-suspected acute rejection (9.8% vs. 8.8%; P = 0.832) and dn-DSA formation (4.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.44) were not significantly different between groups. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated that the graft survivals of two groups were comparable (P = 0.857). After adjusting for patients' age, sex, PRA, HLA mismatch confounders, and the use of corticoids, the multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that methods of induction therapy were not associated with clinically-suspected acute rejection and graft survival (both P > 0.05). The incidences of complications (infections, pneumonia, liver injury and myelosuppression) were all comparable between groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that rATG could be a safe and efficient immunosuppressant when used in a Chinese recipient population with a higher immunological risk in living donor renal transplantation.

Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin for the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplantation.

This report describes the results of 2 international randomized trials (total of 508 kidney transplant recipients). The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG, Thymoglobulin® ) versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) for the quadruple endpoint (treatment failure defined as biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up) to serve as the pivotal data for United States (US) regulatory approval of rATG. The pooled analysis provided an incidence of treatment failure of 25.1% in the rATG and 36.0% in the IL2RA treatment groups, an absolute difference of -10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] -18.8% to -2.9%) supporting noninferiority (noninferiority margin was 10%) and superiority of rATG to IL2RA. In a meta-analysis of 7 trials comparing rATG with an IL2RA, the difference in the proportion of patients with BPAR at 12 months was -4.8% (95% CI -8.6% to -0.9%) in favor of rATG. In conclusion, a rigorous reanalysis of patient-level data from 2 prior randomized, controlled trials comparing rATG versus IL-2R monoclonal antibodies provided support for regulatory approval for rATG for induction therapy in renal transplant, making it the first T cell-depleting therapy approved for the prophylaxis of acute rejection in patients receiving a kidney transplant in the United States.

Inhibiting IL-2 signaling and the regulatory T-cell pathway using computationally designed peptides.

Background Increased serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor alpha (sIL-2Rα) are an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). By binding to IL-2, sIL-2Rα upregulates Foxp3 expression and induces the development of regulatory T (Treg) cells. Methods To inhibit the binding of IL-2 to sIL-2Rα with the goal of suppressing the induction of Foxp3 and decreasing Treg cell numbers, we developed peptides by structure-based computational design to disrupt the interaction between IL-2 and sIL-2Rα. Each peptide was screened using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and 10 of 22 peptides showed variable capacity to inhibit IL-2/sIL-2Rα binding. Results We identified a lead candidate peptide, CMD178, which consistently reduced the expression of Foxp3 and STAT5 induced by IL-2/sIL-2Rα signaling. Furthermore, production of cytokines (IL-2/interferon gamma [IFN-γ]) and granules (perforin/granzyme B) was preserved in CD8+ T cells co-cultured with IL-2-stimulated CD4+ T cells that had been pretreated with CMD178 compared to CD8+ cells co-cultured with untreated IL-2-stimulated CD4+ T cells where it was inhibited. Conclusions We conclude that structure-based peptide design can be used to identify novel peptide inhibitors that block IL-2/sIL-2Rα signaling and inhibit Treg cell development. We anticipate that these peptides will have therapeutic potential in B-cell NHL and other malignancies.

A Review of Induction with Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients.

Pediatric heart transplantation (pHTx) represents only a small proportion of cardiac transplants. Due to these low numbers, clinical data relating to induction therapy in this special population are far less extensive than for adults. Induction is used more widely in pHTx than in adults, mainly because of early steroid withdrawal or complete steroid avoidance. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is the most frequent choice for induction in pHTx, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG, Thymoglobulin®) (Sanofi Genzyme) is the most widely-used ATG preparation. In the absence of large, prospective, blinded trials, we aimed to review the current literature and databases for evidence regarding the use, complications, and dosages of rATG. Analyses from registry databases suggest that, overall, ATG preparations are associated with improved graft survival compared to interleukin-2 receptor antagonists. Advantages for the use of rATG have been shown in low-risk patients given tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in a steroid-free regimen, in sensitized patients with pre-formed alloantibodies and/or a positive donor-specific crossmatch, and in ABO-incompatible pHTx. Registry and clinical data have indicated no increased risk of infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in children given rATG after pHTx. A total rATG dose in the range 3.5-7.5 mg/kg is advisable.

Interleukin-2 receptor antagonists: Protective factors against new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to examine the association between interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2Ra) and new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) among renal transplant recipients (RTRs). METHODS: Between January 1993 and March 2014, 915 patients underwent renal transplantation at Zhongshan Hospital. In all, 557 RTRs were included in the present retrospective cohort study. The incidence of NODAT in this cohort was determined and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for NODAT and to show the association between IL-2Ra use and NODAT development among RTRs. The cumulative incidence of NODAT was compared between groups treated with or without IL-2Ra. RESULTS: The mean ±SD postoperative follow-up was 5.08 ±3.17 years. The incidence of NODAT at the end of follow-up was 20.3%. After adjusting for potential confounders in the multivariate logistic regression (i.e. age, sex, body mass index, history of smoking, family history of diabetes, duration of dialysis, type of dialysis, donor type, recovery of graft function, acute rejection, hepatitis B or C or cytomegalovirus infection, fasting plasma glucose levels before and 1 week after transplantation, preoperative total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, daily dose of glucocorticoid, immunosuppressive regimen type, and immunosuppressant concentration after transplantation), IL-2Ra use was found to be related to a reduced incidence of NODAT. CONCLUSIONS: Use of IL-2Ra is associated with protection against the development of NODAT in RTRs.

Basiliximab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy for living-related renal transplantation: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term effects of the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist basiliximab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin as an induction therapy for living-related renal transplantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, controlled study including 213 cases of renal transplant. Immunosuppressive therapy containing calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids was applied in all cases. The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist group (IL2Ra group) included 108 cases with 20 mg basiliximab induction on Day 0 and Day 4. The other 105 cases comprised the rabbit antithymocyte globulin group (rATG group) with 1.0 mg/kg/day ATG induction from Day 0 to Day 4. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection. Other endpoints included delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss and death. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 3 years. Acute rejection rates in the IL2Ra group and the ATG group were 5.6 and 3.8 % (P = 0.781), and the differences in the DGF rates, graft loss and death were insignificant between groups. All-cause infection rates in the IL2Ra and rATG groups were 26.9 and 43.8 % (P = 0.010). Urinary tract infections were more common in the rATG group than in the IL2Ra group (15.2 vs 6.5 %, P = 0.040). Specific viral infection rates were significantly different (18.1 % in rATG group vs 8.3 % in IL2Ra group, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: IL2Ra and rATG had no significant differences as induction therapies during the perioperative period of living-related renal transplantation, according to acute rejection rates, DGF rates, graft loss, 1- and 3-year patient/graft survival rates. However, the incidence of infection, especially of urinary tract infection and specific viral infection, was higher in rATG-induced patients.

Efficacy and safety of antibody induction therapy in the current era of kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Antibody induction with polyclonal rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (rATG) or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) is widely used in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Collaborative Transplant Study data from 38 311 first deceased-donor kidney transplants (2004-13) were analysed. Transplants were classified as 'normal risk' or 'increased risk' according to current guidelines. Cox regression analysis was applied to subpopulations of propensity score-matched recipients. RESULTS: rATG or IL-2RA induction was given to 64% of increased-risk and 53% of normal-risk patients, respectively. rATG and IL-2RA induction were each associated with reduced risk for graft loss versus no induction in increased-risk patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, P = 0.046 and HR 0.89, P = 0.011, respectively]. The HR values for incidence of treated rejection in increased-risk patients for rATG and IL-2RA versus no induction were 0.75 (P = 0.037) and 0.77 (P < 0.001), respectively. In the normal risk subpopulation, neither induction therapy significantly affected the risk of graft loss or treated rejection. Hospitalization for infection was increased by rATG (P < 0.001) and IL-2RA (P < 0.001) induction. In contrast to patients transplanted during 1994-2003, among patients transplanted during 2004-13, rATG did not significantly affect the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma versus no induction (P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Induction therapy following kidney transplantation should be targeted to increased-risk transplants. In this analysis, a beneficial effect of antibody induction in normal-risk transplants could not be demonstrated.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after kidney transplantation in pediatric recipients: Two cases.

PRES is a neuro-clinical and radiological syndrome that can result as a consequence of several different conditions including hypertension, fluid overload, and immunosuppressive treatment. Herein, we report two children who received kidney and combined liver-kidney transplantation as treatment for renal hypodysplasia associated with bilateral vesico-ureteral reflux and methylmalonic acidemia, respectively. Early after surgery (seven and 10 days), both patients presented with hypertension and seizures. The patients' immunosuppressive regimen included steroid and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporine, respectively) and basiliximab and one with anti-IL2 receptor. In both cases, the imaging strongly supported the diagnosis of PRES. In details, the CT scan showed hypodensities in the posterior areas of the brain, and brain MRI demonstrated parieto-occipital alterations indicative of vasogenic edema. Treatment with calcineurin inhibitors was temporally discontinued and restarted at lower dosage; arterial hypertension was treated with Ca-channel blockers. Both children fully recovered without any neurological sequels. In conclusion, in children undergoing solid organ transplantation, who develop neurological symptoms PRES, should be carefully considered in the differential diagnosis and once the diagnosis is ruled in, we recommend strict arterial blood pressure control and adjustment or withholding of calcineurin inhibitor therapy should be considered based upon blood levels.

Interleukin-2 receptor antagonist compared with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction therapy using the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) under a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death. METHODS: It was a single-centre, retrospective, cohort study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-2RA vs. ATG induction therapy in adult renal transplant recipients from donors after cardiac death. The primary end-point was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 6 months, and the secondary end-point included the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), the renal function, and the patient and graft survival at 6 months. The safety end-point was the incidence of infectious complications. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients (n = 37 in the IL-2RA group and n = 95 in the ATG group) were enrolled from March 2013 to April 2014. The BPAR at 6 months was similar between the two groups (IL-2RA vs. the ATG group, 5.4% vs. 12.6%, respectively, p = 0.228). There were no differences in the DGF, renal function at 1 and 3 months, and the patient and graft survival at 6 months between the two groups, but the renal function at 6 months in the IL-2RA group was superior to that of the ATG group (p = 0.02). The IL-2RA group experienced less infection than the ATG group (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of IL2-RA and ATG induction under a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimen in low-risk DCD transplantation did not differ, but the safety of the IL2-RA induction was better than that of the ATG induction.

Induction Therapies in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate With or Without Steroid Maintenance.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Induction therapy with IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) is recommended as a first line agent in living donor renal transplantation (LRT). However, use of IL2-RA remains controversial in LRT with tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) with or without steroids. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry was studied for patients receiving LRT from 2000 to 2012 maintained on TAC/MPA at discharge (n=36,153) to compare effectiveness of IL2-RA to other induction options. The cohort was initially divided into two groups based on use of maintenance steroid at time of hospital discharge: steroid (n=25,996) versus no-steroid (n=10,157). Each group was further stratified into three categories according to commonly used antibody induction approach: IL2-RA, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG), and no-induction in the steroid group versus IL2-RA, r-ATG and alemtuzumab in the no-steroid group. The main outcomes were the risk of acute rejection at 1 year and overall allograft failure (graft failure or death) post-transplantation through the end of follow-up. Propensity score-weighted regression analysis was used to minimize selection bias due to non-random assignment of induction therapies. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic and Cox analysis adjusted for propensity score showed that outcomes in the steroid group were similar between no-induction (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.86 to 1.08 for acute rejection; and hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.08 for overall allograft failure) and IL2-RA categories. In the no-steroid group, odds of acute rejection with r-ATG (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90) and alemtuzumab (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67) were lower; however, overall allograft failure risk was higher with alemtuzumab (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.56) but not with r-ATG (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.45), compared with IL2-RA induction. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with no-induction therapy, IL2-RA induction was not associated with better outcomes when TAC/MPA/steroids were used in LRT recipients. r-ATG appears to be an acceptable and possibly the preferred induction alternative for IL2-RA in steroid-avoidance protocols.

Clinical outcomes associated with induction regimens among retransplant kidney recipients in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have evaluated outcomes and risk factors associated with induction protocols among kidney transplant recipients. However, few studies have evaluated outcomes in the subset of retransplant recipients who often have unique immunologic condition and risk profile and represent an increasing proportion of transplant patients in the United States. METHODS: We evaluated the association of common induction treatments (alemtuzumab, thymoglobulin, interleukin-2 receptor blockers, and no induction) given at transplantation with clinical outcomes among adult recipients retransplant between 2003 and 2011 using national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (n = 14,336). We used a propensity score analysis to minimize potential selection biases for allocation of treatment. RESULTS: In adjusted models, there were no significant differences between induction groups for outcomes of delayed graft function, 1-year acute rejection, 1-year BK virus or patient death. Acute rejection before hospital discharge was lowest among patients treated with thymoglobulin and alemtuzumab. The no induction group had the highest average 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (62 mL/min/1.73 kg/m(2)) and lowest incidence of any malignancies within 1 year (1.0%). Hospitalizations after transplantation were highest among patients treated with thymoglobulin (42% at 1 year). Recipients with alemtuzumab had the highest relative risk for graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.40, relative to patients treated with thymoglobulin). CONCLUSION: There is moderate variation in clinical outcomes associated with induction treatment among retransplant kidney recipients in the United States, including higher graft loss rates among recipients treated with alemtuzumab but similar patient survival between all regimens.

Association of antibody induction immunosuppression with cancer after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Induction immunosuppression is a mainstay of rejection prevention after transplantation. Studies have suggested a connection between antibody induction agents and cancer development, potentially limiting important immunosuppression protocols. METHODS: We used a linkage of U.S. transplantation data and cancer registries to explore the relationship between induction and cancer after transplantation. A total of 111,857 kidney recipients (1987-2009) in the Transplant Cancer Match Study, which links the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and U.S. Cancer Registries, were included. Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and other cancers with increased incidence after transplantation (lung, colorectal, kidney, and thyroid cancers, plus melanoma). RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred sixty-three cancers of interest were identified. Muromonab-CD3 was associated with increased NHL (aIRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.76). Alemtuzumab was associated with increased NHL (aIRR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.02-3.14), colorectal cancer (aIRR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.03-5.91), and thyroid cancer (aIRR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.55-7.33). Polyclonal induction was associated with increased melanoma (aIRR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.06-2.14). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the relative safety with regard to cancer risk of the most common induction therapies, the need for surveillance of patients treated with alemtuzumab, and the possible role for increased melanoma screening for those patients treated with polyclonal anti-T-cell induction.

Antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is an established treatment option for end-stage liver failure. To date, no consensus has been reached on the use of immunosuppressive T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction of immunosuppression after liver transplantation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction for prevention of acute rejection in liver transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) on 30 September 2013 together with reference checking, citation searching, contact with trial authors and pharmaceutical companies to identify additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised clinical trials assessing immunosuppression with T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction in liver transplant recipients. Our inclusion criteria stated that participants within each included trial should have received the same maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used RevMan for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) and of continuous data with mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed risk of systematic errors (bias) using bias risk domains with definitions. We used trial sequential analysis to control for random errors (play of chance). MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 randomised trials with a total of 1589 liver transplant recipients, which studied the use of T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction. All trials were with high risk of bias. We compared any kind of T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction in 10 trials with 1589 participants, including interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction versus corticosteroid induction in nine trials with 1470 participants, and polyclonal T-cell specific antibody induction versus corticosteroid induction in one trial with 119 participants.Our analyses showed no significant differences regarding mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.43), graft loss (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.53) and acute rejection (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00), infection (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.09), hepatitis C virus recurrence (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.00), malignancy (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.73), and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.07 to 15.38) when any kind of T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (all low-quality evidence). Cytomegalovirus infection was less frequent in patients receiving any kind of T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.75; low-quality evidence). This was also observed when interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83; low-quality evidence), and when polyclonal T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.70; low-quality evidence). However, when trial sequential analysis regarding cytomegalovirus infection was applied, the required information size was not reached. Furthermore, diabetes mellitus occurred less frequently when T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.60; low-quality evidence), when interleukin-2 receptor antagonist induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.61; low-quality evidence), and when polyclonal T-cell specific antibody induction was compared with corticosteroid induction (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.95; low-quality evidence). When trial sequential analysis was applied, the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit was crossed. We found no subgroup differences for type of interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (basiliximab versus daclizumab). Four trials reported on adverse events. However, no differences between trial groups were noted. Limited data were available for meta-analysis on drug-specific adverse events such as haematological adverse events for antithymocyte globulin. No data were available on quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Because of the low quality of the evidence, the effects of T-cell antibody induction remain uncertain. T-cell specific antibody induction seems to reduce diabetes mellitus and may reduce cytomegalovirus infection when compared with corticosteroid induction. No other clear benefits or harms were associated with the use of T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction. For some analyses, the number of trials investigating the use of T-cell specific antibody induction after liver transplantation is small, and the numbers of participants and outcomes in these randomised trials are limited. Furthermore, the included trials are heterogeneous in nature and have applied different types of T-cell specific antibody induction therapy. All trials were at high risk of bias. Hence, additional randomised clinical trials are needed to assess the benefits and harms of T-cell specific antibody induction compared with corticosteroid induction for liver transplant recipients. Such trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic error and of random error.

Polyomavirus BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and rituximab improves transplantation rates. It is unclear if desensitization increases the risk of polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia. Here, BKV viremia in HLA-sensitized patients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab was analyzed. METHODS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared in the desensitized group (N=187) and the non-desensitized group (N=284). Surveillance for BKV viremia was done at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: BKV viremia was observed in 20% of the desensitized and 10% of the non-desensitized (P<0.001) groups by 2 years posttransplant. The desensitized group had more lymphocyte depleting induction and more rejection. They also had a greater degree of viremia with more patients having a peak viral load greater than 10,000 copies per milliliter (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in BKV-associated nephropathy or graft loss in the two groups. There was an association of BKV viremia with desensitization and lymphocyte induction. Only desensitization remained a significant predictor in the multivariable model with an adjusted HR of 2.13 (95% CI 1.21-3.77, P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab is associated with a higher incidence of BKV viremia with high viral copies and was the major predictor of BKV viremia in the multivariable model. More frequent surveillance for BKV viremia and an early, aggressive treatment strategy are essential for preventing high BKV viral loads in this patient population.

Prospective randomized controlled trial of rabbit antithymocyte globulin compared with IL-2 receptor antagonist induction therapy in kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) compared with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists in a racially diverse kidney transplant patient population under modern immunosuppression. BACKGROUND: The optimal induction therapy in patients at risk for rejection, particularly black recipients, in the modern era of immunosuppression with flow cytometry-based cross-matching is unclear. METHODS: This was a prospective, risk-stratified, randomized, single-center, open-label study of 200 consecutively enrolled patients in a large academic teaching center. Patients were randomized to receive either daclizumab or basiliximab versus RATG for induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Patients were stratified between groups to ensure equal numbers of black, retransplants, high panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) (>20%), and prolonged cold ischemic times (>24 hours) in each group. Primary outcome measure is treatment efficacy defined as the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection and estimated creatinine clearance. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Renal transplant recipients were included if they were adult (≥18 years old) and received an allograft from a deceased, living unrelated, or nonhuman leukocyte antigen identical living-related donor. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients (n = 98 in the interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, and n = 102 in the RATG) were enrolled from February 2009 through July 2011. One-year acute rejection rates were low and similar between groups (10% in the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist group vs 6% in the RATG group; P = 0.30). Creatinine clearance was also similar between groups (interleukin-2 receptor antagonist group 56 ± 20 mL/min per 1.73 m2 vs RATG group 55 ± 22 mL/min per 1.73 m2; P = 0.73). Subanalysis of recipient race revealed that in blacks only RATG was protective against 6- and 12-month acute rejection, without an increased risk of infection. Induction did not affect rejection rates according to recipient calculated PRAs; however, RATG was associated with an increased risk of BK virus in low-PRA patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: RATG induction provides improved protection against early acute rejection in black renal transplant recipients, whereas sensitized patients do not seem to demonstrate a similar benefit from this therapy. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00859131).

Immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation has become a valuable and well-accepted treatment option for end-stage heart failure. Rejection of the transplanted heart by the recipient's body is a risk to the success of the procedure, and life-long immunosuppression is necessary to avoid this. Clear evidence is required to identify the best, safest and most effective immunosuppressive treatment strategy for heart transplant recipients. To date, there is no consensus on the use of immunosuppressive antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation. OBJECTIVES: To review the benefits, harms, feasibility and tolerability of immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction versus placebo, or no antibody induction, or another kind of antibody induction for heart transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to November Week 1 2012), EMBASE (Ovid) (1946 to 2012 Week 45), ISI Web of Science (14 November 2012); we also searched two clinical trial registers and checked reference lists in November 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients. Within individual trials, we required all participants to receive the same maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently. RevMan analysis was used for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR), and of continuous data with mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components were used to assess risks of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was used to assess the risks of random errors (play of chance). We assessed mortality, acute rejection, infection, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidaemia. MAIN RESULTS: In this review, we included 22 RCTs that investigated the use of T-cell antibody induction, with a total of 1427 heart-transplant recipients. All trials were judged to be at a high risk of bias. Five trials, with a total of 606 participants, compared any kind of T-cell antibody induction versus no antibody induction; four trials, with a total of 576 participants, compared interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2 RA) versus no induction; one trial, with 30 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus no antibody induction; two trials, with a total of 159 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) induction; four trials, with a total of 185 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus polyclonal antibody induction; seven trials, with a total of 315 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus polyclonal antibody induction; and four trials, with a total of 162 participants, compared polyclonal antibody induction versus another kind, or dose of polyclonal antibodies.No significant differences were found for any of the comparisons for the outcomes of mortality, infection, CMV infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or hyperlipidaemia. Acute rejection occurred significantly less frequently when IL-2 RA induction was compared with no induction (93/284 (33%) versus 132/292 (45%); RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90; I(2) 57%) applying the fixed-effect model. No significant difference was found when the random-effects model was applied (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17; I(2) 57%). In addition, acute rejection occurred more often statistically when IL-2 RA induction was compared with polyclonal antibody induction (24/90 (27%) versus 10/95 (11%); RR 2.43; 95% CI 1.01 to 5.86; I(2) 28%). For all of these differences in acute rejection, trial sequential alpha-spending boundaries were not crossed and the required information sizes were not reached when trial sequential analysis was performed, indicating that we cannot exclude random errors.We observed some occasional significant differences in adverse events in some of the comparisons, however definitions of adverse events varied between trials, and numbers of participants and events in these outcomes were too small to allow definitive conclusions to be drawn. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that acute rejection might be reduced by IL-2 RA compared with no induction, and by polyclonal antibody induction compared with IL-2 RA, though trial sequential analyses cannot exclude random errors, and the significance of our observations depended on the statistical model used. Furthermore, this review does not show other clear benefits or harms associated with the use of any kind of T-cell antibody induction compared with no induction, or when one type of T-cell antibody is compared with another type of antibody. The number of trials investigating the use of antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation is small, and the number of participants and outcomes in these RCTs is limited. Furthermore, the included trials are at a high risk of bias. Hence, more RCTs are needed to assess the benefits and harms of T-cell antibody induction for heart-transplant recipients. Such trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic and random error.