Adaptation and restructuring of an academic anesthesiology department during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: Challenges and lessons learned.

The novel SARS-CoV-2 pandemic starting in 2019 profoundly changed the world, and thousands of residents of New York City were affected, leading to one of the most acute surges in regional hospital capacity. As the largest academic medical center in the Bronx, Montefiore Medical Center was immediately impacted, and the entire hospital was mobilized to address the needs of its community. In this article, we describe our experiences as a large academic anesthesiology department during this pandemic. Our goals were to maximize our staff's expertise, maintain our commitment to wellness and safety, and preserve the quality of patient care. Lessons learned include the importance of critical care training presence and leadership, the challenges of converting an ambulatory surgery center to an intensive care unit (ICU), and the management of effective communication. Lastly, we provide suggestions for institutions facing an acute surge, or subsequent waves of COVID-19, based on a single center's experiences.

Do standards of care and early outcomes of periprosthetic fractures change during the COVID-19 pandemic? A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) are a growing matter for orthopaedic surgeons, and patients with PPFs may represent a frail target in the case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether hospital reorganisations during the most severe phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected standards of care and early outcomes of patients treated for PPFs in Northern Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrieved from a multicentre retrospective orthopaedics and traumatology database, including 14 hospitals. The following parameters were studied: demographics, results of nasopharyngeal swabs, prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), comorbidities, general health status (EQ-5D-5L Score), frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale, CFS), pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), anaesthesiologic risk (American Society of Anaesthesiology Score, ASA Score), classification (unified classification system, UCS), type of operation and anaesthesia, in-hospital and early complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification, CDC), and length of stay (LOS). Data were analysed by means of descriptive statistics. Out of 1390 patients treated for any reason, 38 PPFs were included. RESULTS: Median age was 81 years (range 70-96 years). Twenty-three patients (60.5%) were swabbed on admission, and two of them (5.3%) tested positive; in three patients (7.9%), the diagnosis of COVID-19 was established on a clinical and radiological basis. Two more patients tested positive post-operatively, and one of them died due to COVID-19. Thirty-three patients (86.8%) presented a proximal femoral PPF. Median ASA Score was 3 (range, 1-4), median VAS score on admission was 3 (range, 0-6), median CFS was 4 (range, 1-8), median EQ-5D-5L Score was 3 in each one of the categories (range, 1-5). Twenty-three patients (60.5%) developed post-operative complications, and median CDC grade was 3 (range, 1-5). The median LOS was 12.8 days (range 2-36 days), and 21 patients (55.3%) were discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PPFs did not seem to change during the lockdown. Patients were mainly elderly with comorbidities, and complications were frequently recorded post-operatively. Despite the difficult period for the healthcare system, hospitals were able to provide effective conventional surgical treatments for PPFs, which were not negatively influenced by the reorganisation. Continued efforts are required to optimise the treatment of these frail patients in the period of the pandemic, minimising the risk of contamination, and to limit the incidence of PPFs in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

[Development of organizations in Norwegian hospitals]. / Organisasjonsutvikling ved norske sykehus.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals in Norway are changing as a result of altered hospital environments and the constraints they are placed under. This article describes the organizational development in Norwegian hospitals from 1999 to 2005 and discusses whether the developments observed can be interpreted as a modernization of the Norwegian hospital system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The article is based on a survey sent to all public hospitals in 2001, 2003 and 2005. In 2001 the hospitals were asked retrospectively about 1999. In 2005, 60 of 63 hospitals responded to the survey. RESULTS: Results indicate a consistent pattern of organizational development from 1999 to 2005. Some areas change to a greater degree than others; the most noticeable is decentralization in terms of financial routines and personnel responsibilities. Other major organizational developments include ring fencing of elective surgery, co-localization of hospital reception rooms and emergency wards, and increased use of computerized routines, both for patient management and treatment. INTERPRETATION: It has been demonstrated that Norwegian hospitals are able to change and adapt. Several standardized organizational and leadership structures recommended by official reviews are increasingly being adopted into practice. Hospitals are being modernized.

Propuesta conceptual de la restructuración de la dirección general de epidemiología / Conceptual proposal of the restructuring of the general direction of epidemiology

El objetivo del documento es definir nuevas funciones, atribuciones y responsabilidades a nivel nacional, departamental y distrital de la DGE y las otras Direcciones en relación a la epidemiolog1a, definir compotencias intrainstitucionales e interinstitucionales, contar con un organigrama de funcionamiento acorde con un Ministerio de Salud en el marco de la descentralización y la epidemiología del siglo XXI.