RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Posterior fixation without fusion can treat thoracolumbar and lumbar traumatic fractures effectively in certain cases. However, whether patients benefit from implant removal and the correlation between the range of motion (ROM) of the involved segments and the removal time have not been determined. METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, we retrospectively reviewed data of patients with AO spine type A or B thoracolumbar or lumbar traumatic fractures who underwent implant removal. A total of 17 patients (group A), 21 patients (group B), and 12 patients (group C) underwent implant removal after the index surgery within 12 months, between 12 and 24 months, and over 24 months, respectively. Clinical and radiological outcomes, including visual analog scale for back pain, patient satisfaction, Oswestry disability index, and EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire, for quality of life and segmental ROM were analyzed. RESULTS: The average follow-up time was 9.1 ± 5.7 months after implant removal. There were no significant differences in visual analog scale and patient satisfaction among the 3 groups at the same observation time point. Among the 3 groups, patients in group A gained the lowest Oswestry disability index and highest EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire scores after removal and at the final follow-up. The best ROM was obtained in group A followed by groups B and C (11.5° ± 6.2°, 5.5° ± 1.6°, and 2.4° ± 0.6°, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Immobilization of the involved segments over 24 months may lead to loss of ROM. Regained segmental ROM is correlated negatively with implant removal time, and removal within 12 months promises a better ROM and quality of life.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/tendências , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The characteristics of and indications for open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have evolved over time. We evaluated these trends through the experience at a tertiary care academic center. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing open AAA repair (inclusive of type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms) from 2005 to 2018 at an academic institution. Trends over time were evaluated using the Spearman test; Cox regression was used to determine predictors of mortality and to generate adjusted survival curves. RESULTS: There were 628 patients (71.5% male; 88.2% white) with a mean age of 70.5 ± 9.4 years who underwent open AAA repair with a mean aneurysm diameter of 6.2 ± 1.5 cm. The median length of stay was 10 days, and the median intensive care unit length of stay was 3 days. Urgent repair was undertaken in 21.1%; 22.3% were type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, and 9.9% were performed for explantation. Our series favored a retroperitoneal approach in the majority of cases (82.5%). The proximal clamp sites were supraceliac (46.1%), suprarenal (29.1%), and infrarenal (24.8%), with approximately a third requiring renal artery reimplantation. The average cross-clamp time was 25.5 ± 14.9 minutes; the mean renal ischemia time for supraceliac and suprarenal clamp sites was 28.4 ± 12.3 minutes and 23.5 ± 12.7 minutes, respectively. Postoperative renal dysfunction occurred in 19.6% of the overall cohort, with 6.2% requiring hemodialysis. Of those requiring postoperative hemodialysis, the majority (75%) received an urgent repair. The in-hospital mortality was 2.3% for elective cases vs 20.9% for urgent repair, and 29.8% of patients were discharged to rehabilitation, with an overall 30-day readmission rate of 7.9%. Over time, there were trends of increased aneurysm repair complexity, with decreasing infrarenal clamp sites, increasing supraceliac clamp sites, increasing proportion of explantations, and increasing need for bifurcated grafts. The acuity of aneurysm repair likewise changed, with the proportion of urgent repairs increasing over time, largely attributable to the rise in explantations. Clamp site influenced the frequency of perioperative complications. Urgent repairs and age at operation were associated with mortality, whereas mortality was not associated with need for explantation and clamp location. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm repair reflected increasing complexity over time, with the need for explantation among urgent repairs significantly on the rise. Urgency and clamp location independently predicted long-term mortality, even after adjustment for age. These findings underscore the changing landscape of open AAA repair in the current era.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/tendências , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/tendências , Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/tendências , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Stents/efeitos adversos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While major complications associated with CIED lead extractions are uncommon, they carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality in the absence of surgical intervention. However, there is limited data on the differences in outcomes of these procedures between centers with and without on-site CS support. The present study examined outcomes of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extractions according to admitting hospitals' cardiac surgery (CS) facilities. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample for CIED lead extraction procedures, stratified by hospitals' CS facilities into two groups; on-site and off-site CS. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the adjusted odds (aOR) of procedure-related complications in off-site CS centers. RESULTS: In 221,606 procedures over an 11-year-period, CIED lead extractions were increasingly undertaken in on-site as opposed to off-site CS centers (Onsite CS 2004 vs. 2014: 78.2% vs. 90.4%, pâ¯<â¯0.001) during the study period. In comparison to on-site CS group, patients admitted to off-site CS group were older, less comorbid, and experienced lower adjusted odds of major adverse cardiovascular events (0.72 [0.67, 0.77]), mortality (0.60 [0.52, 0.69]), procedure-related bleeding (0.48 [0.44, 0.54]) and complications (thoracic: 0.81 [0.75, 0.88]; cardiac: 0.45 [0.38, 0.54]) (pâ¯<â¯0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our national analysis demonstrates that transvenous CIED lead extractions are being increasingly undertaken in centers with on-site CS surgery, in compliance with international guideline recommendations. Patients managed with lead extractions in on-site CS centers are more comorbid and critically ill compared to those admitted to off-site CS centers, and remain at a higher risk of procedure-related complications.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/tendências , Serviço Hospitalar de Cardiologia/tendências , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Eletrodos Implantados/tendências , Marca-Passo Artificial/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ureteral stents are necessary in the routine practice of an urologist. Choosing the correct stent and being aware of the options available will allow urologists to provide the best possible care for patients and value to the healthcare system. This review seeks to educate urologists regarding improvements in stent technology currently available or in development. RECENT FINDINGS: Research from around the world is underway to discover an ideal stent - one that is comfortable for patients, resists infection and encrustation and is affordable for hospital systems. Stent design alterations and stent coatings are revealing reductions in encrustation and bacterial colonization. Biodegradable stents and magnetic stents are being tested to prevent the discomfort of cystoscopic removal. Intraureteral stents are proving efficacious while eliminating an irritating coil from the bladder and the symptoms associated with it. SUMMARY: The studies highlighted in this review provide encouraging results in the pursuit of the ideal stent while opening discussion around new concepts and further areas of research.
Assuntos
Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/normas , Stents/efeitos adversos , Stents/normas , Ureter/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/efeitos adversos , Implantes Absorvíveis , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/prevenção & controle , Remoção de Dispositivo/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/normas , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese , Ureteroscopia/instrumentação , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) complicate 1% to 9% of elective spine surgeries. Previously identified risk factors include diabetes mellitus type 2, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. We sought to determine whether the use of postoperative surgical site drains is associated with deep SSIs. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients operated for deep SSIs after surgery for degenerative spine pathologies between July 2016 and December 2018. Patients were excluded if the reason for operation was other than deep SSI or if their primary operation was for infection or tumor. Using their index procedure and the electronic medical record, patients were matched to controls based on age, surgical invasiveness, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code, race, and sex. Our main outcome of interest was whether drain retention time, total output, or daily output differed significantly between cases and controls. RESULTS: We identified 38 patients who met inclusion criteria. Infected patients had a higher body mass index (34.2 vs. 29.9 kg/m2; P = 0.001), higher odds of having diabetes mellitus type 2 (55.3% vs. 18.4%; P = 0.002), longer drain retention time (5.5 vs. 3.5 days; P = 0.02), and longer inpatient stay (9.5 vs. 4.3 days; P = 0.005). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that even after controlling for the other risk factors, drain retention time independently predicted postoperative surgical site infection (odds ratio: 1.36; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged surgical drain retention correlates with risk of deep SSI after surgery for degenerative spine disease independent of surgical invasiveness, diabetes mellitus type 2 status, and total drain output. Our data suggest early postoperative drain removal may potentially decrease the risk of SSI and shorten duration of hospital stay.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirurgia , Drenagem/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
AIMS: The aim of this survey was to assess the management and organization of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) replacement in Italy. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 24 questions on organizational aspects and on the peri-procedural management of anticoagulant therapies and antibiotic prophylaxis was sent via the Internet to 154 Italian arrhythmia centers. RESULTS: A total of 103 out of 154 centers completed the questionnaire (67% response rate). In 43% of the centers, the procedures were performed under day-case admission, in 40% under ordinary admission, and in 17% under either day-case or ordinary admission. The most frequent reason (66%) for choosing ordinary admission rather than day-case admission was to obtain full reimbursement. Although warfarin therapy was continued in 73% of the centers, nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants were discontinued, without bridging, 24âh or less prior to replacement procedures in 88%. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy was systematically administered in all centers; in 97%, the first antibiotic dose was administered 1-2âh prior to procedures. Local antibacterial envelopes were also used in 43% of the centers in patients with a higher risk of device infection. CONCLUSION: This survey provides a representative picture of how CIED replacements are organized and managed in current Italian clinical practice. The choice of the type of hospitalization (short versus ordinary) was more often motivated by economic reasons (reimbursement of the procedure) than by clinical and organizational factors. Peri-procedural management of anticoagulation and prophylactic antibiotic therapy was consistent with current scientific evidence.
Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/tendências , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/tendências , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Cardioversão Elétrica/tendências , Marca-Passo Artificial/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/economia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/economia , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Esquema de Medicação , Cardioversão Elétrica/economia , Cardioversão Elétrica/instrumentação , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Tempo de Internação , Marca-Passo Artificial/economia , Admissão do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Falha de Prótese , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine practice patterns of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion and retrieval at a tertiary care institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of all IVC filter procedures performed at the University of Pennsylvania and entered into the Penn cohort of the Vascular Quality Initiative registry between January 2013 and September 2017 was performed. Data collected included demographics, venous thromboembolism risk factors, indications for filter placement, and presence and timing of retrieval. Trend analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with failure to retrieve the filter. RESULTS: During the study period, 627 IVC filters were inserted. The mean age was 52.8 ± 16.9 years, and 49.3% were male; 39.2% were placed for a major indication, whereas 58.1% were placed for prophylaxis. There was a significant decline in overall frequency of filter placement during the period observed, with a 33% decrease from 2015 to 2016 and a 26% decrease from 2016 to 2017 (P < .001), with an overall retrieval rate of 44.9%. In contrast, there was a corresponding increase in filter retrieval, with a 20% increase in 2015 and a 68% increase in 2016 (P = .02). In evaluating trends separated by indication, there was a significant decline in prophylactic filter placement (P < .001) and a trend toward an increase in retrieval of prophylactic filters (P = .09). Whereas there was not a significant change in number of filter insertions for major indication (P = .06), filter retrievals for major indication filters increased (P = .01). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that longer time to follow-up (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; P < .001) and discharge to rehabilitation facility (OR, 6.14; P < .001) were predictive of failure to retrieve the filter. In contrast, filter placement at a later date within our study period (OR, 0.90; P < .001) and prophylactic indication for filter placement (OR, 0.36; P < .001) were protective from filter nonretrieval. CONCLUSIONS: These results show both a decline in overall IVC filter placement and an increase in overall IVC filter retrieval at our institution. These trends are predominantly due to a decrease in prophylactic filter placement as well as an overall increase in filter retrieval. Further study should be dedicated to increasing the retrieval rate in this population of patients.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Implantação de Prótese/tendências , Centros de Atenção Terciária/tendências , Filtros de Veia Cava/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Philadelphia , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether leukoaraiosis severity is associated with outcome in acute stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with stent-retriever devices. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, we evaluated 251 acute stroke patients (pretreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥8) treated with stent-retriever devices. Leukoaraiosis severity was graded as 0-2 (absent-to-moderate) versus 3-4 (severe) according to the van Swieten scale. The main clinical outcome was the proportion of good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 at 90 days. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the severe LA group than in the absent-to-moderate LA group achieved a good functional outcome (18.4% vs 50.2%, P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, severe leukoaraiosis was a significant negative predictor of good functional outcome at 90 days (OR, 0.27; 95% CI 0.10-0.77; P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of leukoaraiosis is independently associated with 90-day functional outcome in acute stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with stent-retriever devices.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Leucoaraiose/terapia , Trombólise Mecânica/tendências , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Stents , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Leucoaraiose/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Trombólise Mecânica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombectomia/métodos , Trombectomia/tendências , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Practice patterns associated with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement have seen considerable variation in the last decade. We used a statewide administrative database to examine trends in IVC filter placement and retrieval in the general population. METHODS: We reviewed Florida state inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases from 2004 to 2014. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were searched for patients undergoing inpatient or outpatient IVC filter placement, and each patient was longitudinally tracked to the time of inpatient or outpatient filter retrieval. For inpatient filter placements, associated diagnoses were reviewed to identify indications for placement. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify factors associated with improved retrieval rates. RESULTS: During the 11-year period, 131,791 IVC filter placements were identified, with a 50% increase from 2004 to 2010 and a 24% decline from 2010 to 2014. Median age at filter placement was 71 years (interquartile range, 57-81 years). Mean follow-up after filter placement was 17.3 ± 25.5 months. Only 8637 filters (6.6%) were retrieved. The annual retrieval rate trended upward, from 3.4% in 2004 to 8.5% in 2013 (P < .001). Median filter dwell time was 96.5 days (interquartile range, 44-178 days). Diagnoses associated with filter placement included venous thromboembolism (75.9%), trauma (35.0%), hemorrhage (29.9%), malignant disease (29.4%), and stroke (5.1%). Retrieval rates were highest in younger patients (34.0% in patients younger than 20 years) and lowest in Medicare patients (2.5%). In a multivariate logistic regression model, Medicare was associated with decreased retrieval rates (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.35; P < .001) after adjusting for age and associated diagnoses. Weaker risk factors included increased age, white race, and diagnoses of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and malignant disease. A trauma diagnosis was associated with improved retrieval. To further investigate the Medicare effect, a propensity score-matched model was created to better account for confounding effects. In this model, Medicare persisted as a risk factor for decreased filter retrieval (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.46; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: IVC filter placements, after a substantial increase between 2004 and 2010, have been declining since 2010. Retrieval rates in the general population are steadily improving but continue to lag behind those described in center-specific literature. Increased age and Medicare as the primary payer are the strongest risk factors for lack of filter retrieval. Widespread improvements on a national scale are needed to improve the appropriateness of filter placements and to enhance filter retrieval rates.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Implantação de Prótese/tendências , Filtros de Veia Cava/tendências , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Florida , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Various implant materials have been used in medial, opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) including traditional metal and modern polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants. The purpose of this study was to compare metal and PEEK implants and determine safety, varus deformity correction, as well as short- to mid-term hardware removal and arthroplasty rates. METHODS: HTO performed with metal and PEEK implants were reviewed between 2000 and 2015 at two institutions with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Postoperative complications, radiographic measures, and osteotomy union were compared between groups using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact testing. Survival free of hardware removal and arthroplasty was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier testing. Risk factors for HTO conversion to arthroplasty were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Ninety-five HTOs were performed in 90 patients (59 M, 31 F) using 50 metal and 45 PEEK implants. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range 2.0-16.5). Two metal and two PEEK HTO patients experienced nonunions, resulting in revision HTO at a mean of 1.0 years postoperatively (range 0.4-1.4 years). Both implant groups demonstrated similar, significant improvements in coronal deformity, with mean angulation improving from 6.0° and 5.4° varus preoperatively to 1.1° and 1.0° valgus postoperatively for the metal (p < 0.01) and PEEK groups (p < 0.01), respectively. 2- and 5-year hardware removal-free survival was 94% and 94% for PEEK, which was significantly superior to 80% and 73% observed for metal (p = 0.02). 2- and 5-year arthroplasty-free survival was similar for the metal (98% and 94%) and PEEK groups (100% and 78%) (n.s.). HTO performed for focal cartilage defects was observed to demonstrate decreased arthroplasty risk (HR 0.36, p = 0.03) when compared to HTO performed for osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Both metal and PEEK implants were found to be effective in obtaining and maintaining coronal varus deformity correction, with 88% overall arthroplasty-free survival at 5 years. Metal fixation demonstrated a higher rate of hardware removal while HTO performed for medial compartment osteoarthritis predicted conversation to arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Cetonas , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Osteotomia/métodos , Polietilenoglicóis , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Benzofenonas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Previsões , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico , Polímeros , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Radiografia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Oesophageal stents are widely used for palliating dysphagia from malignant obstruction. They are also used with increasing frequency in the treatment of oesophageal perforation, as well as benign strictures from a variety of causes. Improved oncological treatments have led to prolonged survival of patients treated with palliative intent; as a consequence, stents need to function and last longer in order to avoid repeat procedures. There is also increasing need for meticulous procedure planning, careful selection of the device most appropriate for the individual patient and planned follow-up. Furthermore, as more patients are cured, there will be more issues with resultant long-term side-effects, such as recalcitrant strictures due to radiotherapy or anastomotic scarring, which will have to be addressed. Stent design needs to keep up with the progress of cancer treatment, in order to offer patients the best possible long-term result. This review article attempts to illustrate the changing realities in oesophageal stenting, differences in current stent designs and behaviour, as well as the pressing need to refine and modify devices in order to meet the new challenges.
Assuntos
Doenças do Esôfago/terapia , Stents/tendências , Implantes Absorvíveis/tendências , Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias/etiologia , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Fístula Esofágica/etiologia , Migração de Corpo Estranho/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese/tendências , Recidiva , Stents/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) during transvenous lead extractions (TLEs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-one high-risk patients who underwent TLE in the operating room from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, were included in the study. Of these, 9 patients underwent VATS during TLE. Their clinical characteristics, indications for lead extraction, and complications associated with TLE in the 9 patients who had VATS were compared with those for the 82 patients who did not have VATS. The mean (SD) age of the study patients was 61 (17) years (64.8% were male). The lead dwell time, number of leads extracted, and clinical comorbidities were similar between the 2 groups. Superior vena cava (SVC) tear occurred in 2 of the 9 patients in VATS group and in 1 of the 82 in the non-VATS group (22.2% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.03). Of the 2 patients in the VATS group who had SVC tears, in 1 the tear was visualized immediately and there was no hemodynamic compromise. In the other patient, the SVC tear was within the pericardium; the blood pressure recovered quickly after sternotomy and repair. Both patients had complete lead extraction and survived hospitalization. The patient in the non-VATS group who had an SVC tear had a successful repair but died of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of VATS to facilitate TLE is beneficial for early recognition of SVC tear and timely surgical repair in select high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/métodos , Veia Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Cava Superior/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/tendências , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are increasingly used in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who have contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. However, previous studies have shown that many retrievable filters are left permanently in patients. This study aimed to identify the common indications for IVC filter insertion, the filter retrieval rate, and the predictive factors for filter retrieval attempts. To this end, a retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary care center in South Korea between January 2010 and May 2016. Electronic medical charts were reviewed for patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) who underwent IVC filter insertion. A total of 439 cases were reviewed. The most common indication for filter insertion was a preoperative/procedural aim, followed by extensive iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Retrieval of the IVC filter was attempted in 44.9% of patients. The retrieval success rate was 93.9%. History of cerebral hemorrhage, malignancy, and admission to a nonsurgical department were the significant predictive factors of a lower retrieval attempt rate in multivariate analysis. With the increased use of IVC filters, more issues should be addressed before placing a filter and physicians should attempt to improve the filter retrieval rate.
Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Implantação de Prótese/tendências , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Filtros de Veia Cava/tendências , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware infection is a serious complication, often resulting in multiple hardware salvage attempts, hospitalizations, and long-term antibiotic therapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to quantify the costs of DBS hardware-related infections in patients undergoing eventual device explantation. METHODS: Of 362 patients who underwent 530 electrode placements (1 January 2010 to 30 December 2014), 16 (4.4%) had at least 2 hardware salvage procedures. Most (n = 15 [93.8%]) required complete explantation due to recurrent infection. Financial data (itemized hospital and physician costs) were available for 13 patients and these were analyzed along with the demographic data. RESULTS: Each patient underwent 1-5 salvage procedures (mean 2.5 ± 1.4; median 2). The mean total cost for a patient undergoing the median number of revisions (n = 2), device explantation, and subsequent reimplantation after infection clearance was USD 75,505; just over half this cost (54.2% [USD 40,960]) was attributable to reimplantation, and nearly one-third (28.9% [USD 21,816]) was attributable to hardware salvage procedures. Operating-room costs were the highest cost category for hardware revision and explantation. Medical and surgical supplies accounted for the highest reimplantation cost. CONCLUSIONS: DBS infection incurs significant health care costs associated with hardware salvage attempts, explantation, and reimplantation. The highest cost categories are operating-room services and medical and surgical supplies.
Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/efeitos adversos , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/economia , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Contaminação de Equipamentos/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Reoperação/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Reoperação/tendências , Adulto JovemRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A cost-utility analysis (CUA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of pedicle screw removal after posterior fusion in thoracolumbar burst fractures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw instrumentation is a standard fixation method for unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture. However, removal of the pedicle screw after successful fusion remains controversial because the clinical benefits remain unclear. CUA can help clinicians make appropriate decisions about optimal health care for pedicle screw removal after successful fusion in thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, longitudinal matched-cohort study of prospectively collected outcomes. In total, 88 consecutive patients who had undergone pedicle screw instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fracture with successful fusion confirmed by computed tomography (CT) were used in this study. In total, 45 patients wanted to undergo implant removal surgery (R group), and 43 decided not to remove the implant (NR group). A CUA was conducted from the health care perspective. The direct costs of health care were obtained from the medical bill of each patient. Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores, validated by Short Form 6D, were used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Total costs and gained QALY were calculated at 1 year (1 year) and 2 years (2 years) compared with baseline. Results are expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Different discount rates (0%, 3%, and 5%) were applied to both cost and QALY for sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Baseline patient variables were similar between the two groups (all Pâ>â0.05). The additional benefits of implant removal (0.201 QALY at 2 years) were achieved with additional costs ($2541 at 2 years), equating to an ICER of $12,641/QALY. On the basis of the different discount rates, the robustness of our study's results was also determined. CONCLUSION: Implant removal after successful fusion in a thoracolumbar burst fracture is cost-effective until postoperative year 2. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Remoção de Dispositivo/economia , Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Parafusos Pediculares/economia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício/tendências , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação de Fratura/economia , Fixação de Fratura/tendências , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parafusos Pediculares/tendências , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Vértebras Torácicas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead removal (TLR) has made significant progress with respect to innovation, efficacy, and safety. However, limited data exist regarding trends in use and adverse outcomes outside the centers of considerable experience for TLR. The aim of our study was to examine use patterns, frequency of adverse events, and influence of hospital volume on complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified 91 890 TLR procedures. We investigated common complications including pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with TLR, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. We specifically assessed in-hospital death (2.2%), hemorrhage requiring transfusion (2.6%), vascular complications (2.0%), pericardial complications (1.4%), open heart surgery (0.2%), and postoperative respiratory failure (2.4%). Independent predictors of complications were female sex and device infections. Hospital volume was not independently associated with higher complications. There was a significant rise in overall complication rates over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing TLR was higher than previously reported. Female sex and device infections are associated with higher complications. Hospital volume was not associated with higher complication rates. The number of adverse events in the literature likely underestimates the actual number of complications associated with TLR.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/tendências , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To prevent urinary retention, urinary catheters commonly are removed only after thoracic epidural discontinuation after thoracotomy. However, prolonged catheterization increases the risk of infection. The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of urinary retention and catheter-associated infection after early catheter removal. DESIGN: This study described a prospective trial instituting an early urinary catheter removal protocol compared with a historic control group of patients. SETTING: The protocol was instituted at a single, academic thoracic surgery unit. PARTICIPANTS: The study group was comprised of patients undergoing surgery requiring thoracotomy who received an intraoperative epidural for postoperative pain control. INTERVENTIONS: An early urinary catheter removal protocol was instituted prospectively, with all catheters removed on or before postoperative day 2. Urinary retention was determined by bladder ultrasound and treated with recatheterization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were urinary retention rate, defined as bladder volume>400 mL, and urinary tract infection rate. Results were compared with a retrospective cohort of 210 consecutive patients who underwent surgery before protocol initiation. Among the 101 prospectively enrolled patients, urinary retention rate was higher (26.7% v 12.4%, p = 0.003), while urinary tract infection rate improved moderately (1% v 3.8%, p = 0.280). CONCLUSIONS: Early removal of urinary catheters with thoracic epidurals in place is associated with a high incidence of urinary retention. However, an early catheter removal protocol may play a role in a multifaceted approach to reducing the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Toracotomia , Cateteres Urinários , Idoso , Analgesia Epidural/tendências , Estudos de Coortes , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Toracotomia/efeitos adversos , Toracotomia/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Cateteres Urinários/microbiologia , Cateteres Urinários/tendênciasRESUMO
This study reports cerebral angiographic findings observed after stent retriever thrombectomy that is suggestive of a higher risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT). A woman aged 65-75 presented with a right middle cerebral artery syndrome confirmed by non-contrast CT brain scan. Endovascular revascularization using the Solitaire device was placed across the thromboembolic occlusion and thromboembolectomy was performed. Angiography showed complete recanalization of the left internal carotid artery, anterior and middle cerebral artery branches. Twelve hours following the procedure the patient had a hemorrhagic conversion of the ischemic infarct with significant mass effect causing herniation. Despite surgical intervention (hemicraniectomy) the patient died. The angiographic features following revascularization of the vessels distal to the occlusion showed subtle dilations which were visualized at the branch points of the vessels. This may be a warning sign of increased risk of HT.
Assuntos
Angiografia Cerebral/tendências , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Stents , Trombectomia/tendências , Idoso , Hemorragia Cerebral/cirurgia , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vena cava filter (VCF) use in the United States has increased dramatically with prophylactic indications for placement and the availability of low-profile retrievable devices, which are overtaking the filter market. We surveyed the practice patterns of a large group of vascular surgeons from a regional vascular surgery society to see whether they mirrored current national trends. METHODS: A 17-question online VCF survey was offered to all members of the Southern Association of Vascular Surgery. The responses were analyzed using the χ(2) goodness of fit tests. RESULTS: Of the 276 members surveyed, 126 (46%) responded, with 118 (93%) indicating that they placed filters during their practice. Highly significant differences were identified with each question (at least P < 0.002). Regarding the inferior vena cava, the preferred permanent filters were the Greenfield (31%), the TrapEase (15%), the Vena Tech (5%), and a variety of retrievable devices (49%). Fifty percent of the respondents placed retrievable filters selectively; 26% always placed them; and 24% never did. Filters were placed for prophylactic indications <50% of the time by 63% of the respondents. Overall, retrievable filters (when not used as permanent filters) were removed <25% of the time by 64% of the respondents and <50% of the time by 78% of the respondents. The femoral vein was the preferred access site for 84% of the respondents. Major complications were few but included filter migration to the atrium (one), atrial perforation (one), abdominal pain requiring surgical filter removal (two), inferior vena cava thrombosis (12 vena cava thrombosis--4 due to TrapEase filters), strut fracture with embolization to heart or lungs (three Bard retrievable filters), and severe tilting precluding percutaneous retrieval and protection from pulmonary emboli (8 filters with severe tilt--7 of which were Bard). Of the respondents, 59% had never placed a superior vena cava filter, and 28% had placed five or fewer. CONCLUSIONS: Although VCF insertion overall appears safe, some complications are specific to biconical and certain retrievable filters. Given the low removal rate and lack of long-term experience with retrievable filters, routine use of these devices as permanent filters should be questioned. If used on a temporary basis, there should be a plan for filter removal at the time of implantation.
Assuntos
Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Implantação de Prótese/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Filtros de Veia Cava/tendências , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Remoção de Dispositivo/tendências , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Desenho de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The rising number of device implantation has seen a parallel in the rising numbers of lead extraction. Herein we have analysed our experience in cardiac device and lead extraction in a single tertiary centre over the last decade. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing lead extractions performed between 2001 and 2010. Procedural success and complications as defined by the Heart Rhythm Society policy. RESULTS: A total of 745 leads were extracted with a procedural success of 98.9% [382 cases; partial success in 6.9% (26) cases] and failure in 1.1% (4). Major complication rate was 1% (four cases) and minor complication rate was 3.6%. By both univariate and multivariate analysis only duration of lead implantation was an indicator for success (p < 0.0001). The mean implantation time for failed lead extraction was 203 ± 64 months compared with 71.8 ± 16.5 months in the successful cohort (p < 0.0001). Laser-assisted extraction was required in 176 cases. With regard to extraction indication, lead malfunction/recall showed a significant increase during the study period (p = 0.03). On time trend analysis the rise in coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction over time was significant. (p = 0.02) Despite a trend for increased laser use over time this did not achieve statistical significance, p = 0.06. CONCLUSIONS: A decade's experience of percutaneous lead extraction suggests that a high procedural success rate with a low complication rate is achieved in a high-volume centre. During this time, an increase in both defibrillator and CS lead explantation and a rising trend in laser assistance with almost 50% of cases needing laser usage were observed.