Infection control in the bronchoscopy suite: effective reprocessing and disinfection of reusable bronchoscopes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With advancements in technology, flexible bronchoscopes have become thinner in diameter and in need of more thorough reprocessing to prevent infection transmission than ever before. Many experienced bronchoscopists are not aware of the critical steps involved in effective bronchoscope reprocessing and we hope to bridge this gap by describing this process in detail. RECENT FINDINGS: Bronchoscope reprocessing includes several distinct steps (precleaning, leak testing, manual cleaning, visual inspection, terminal reprocessing, rinsing and drying). Each step is comprehensive and needs to be carried out systematically by trained personnel. Failure of any step can lead to serious downstream events such as outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks. Some experts now recommend sterilization when feasible, although high-level disinfection remains the minimum standard. We also will review some literature on the utility of borescopes, automated endoscope reprocessors and disposable bronchoscopes. SUMMARY: Our article will focus on the most recent recommendations for effective reprocessing and disinfection of reusable bronchoscopes.

Effectiveness of oolong tea and simethicone solution for lens cleansing during colonoscopy: A double-blinded randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: water is an imperfect agent for lens cleansing during endoscopy due to its incompetence to clean hydrophobic dirt, whereas amphiphilic surfactants have the potential to overcome the limitation of water. The trial was aimed to evaluate the cleansing effectiveness of 2 typical surfactants (simethicone solution and oolong tea) for colonoscopic lens. METHODS: Oolong tea (O-), low concentration simethicone solution (S1-), high concentration simethicone solution (S2-) and distilled water (D-) were used as washing solutions for colonoscopic lens. Study I: The tip of the colonoscope was immersed in lard oil in order to simulate the blur, and photographs were taken toward a standard colonoscopy image in-vitro pre- and post- each cleansing procedure. The blurred areas of each image were quantified and compared. Study II: 395 consecutive patients who were due to colonoscopy examination were enrolled and randomized into O-, S2-, D-group. The volume of washing solution used and cleansing level during the examination procedure, adenoma and polyp detected per colonoscopy, insertion time and withdraw time were analyzed. RESULTS: Study I: There were no differences in 4 groups for the blurred areas on images before lens cleansing. The blurred areas after lens cleansing were significantly smaller in 3 groups (O- 8.47 ±â€Š20.91 vs S1- 13.06 ±â€Š10.71 vs S2- 6.76 ±â€Š8.49 vs D- 38.24 ±â€Š29.69, P < .05) than water. The decline range of blurred areas after lens cleansing in oolong tea, low concentration simethicone solution, high concentration simethicone solution groups were significantly higher than that in distilled water group (O- 87.35 ±â€Š20.81 vs S1- 78.12 ±â€Š19.24 vs S2- 89.57 ±â€Š8.50 vs D- 53.39 ±â€Š28.45, P < .05). Study II: The volume of washing solution used in S2-group was significantly smaller than that in O-group and D-group. The cleansing level of the colonoscopic lens of O-group was significantly superior than that of S2-group and D-group. CONCLUSIONS: The in-vitro test showed oolong tea and simethicone solution can effectively cleans the colonoscopic lens. The clinical trial demonstrated that oolong tea instead of water is effective to provide better visualization during colonoscopy.Registration: Chictr.org.cn No: ChiCTR1900025606.

Comparación de los desenlaces clínicos con cuatro técnicas de apendicetomía laparoscópica tras la implementación de políticas de reúso de dispositivos médicos / Comparison of clinical outcomes with four laparoscopic appendectomy techniques after implementation of medical devices reuse policy

Resumen Objetivo: En este estudio se comparan los desenlaces clínicos de cuatro técnicas de apendicectomía laparoscópica utilizadas en una institución colombiana para el manejo de la apendicitis aguda tras la adopción de políticas de reúso y reprocesamiento de dispositivos médicos para la Región de las Américas (2014). Materiales y Método: Mediante el análisis de varianza de una vía (ANOVA) y la prueba de Kruskal Wallis, se compararon las tasas de infección de sitio operatorio (ISO), reoperación no planeada, readmisión y mortalidad (en los primeros 30 días del postoperatorio) de las siguientes técnicas: Técnica 1: Ligadura del muñón apendicular con endonudo y disección del mesenterio apendicular con electrocoagulación bipolar convencional; Técnica 2: Clipaje del muñón con endoclip de polímero y disección del mesenterio con electrocoagulación bipolar convencional; Técnica 3: Clipaje del muñón con endoclip de polímero y disección del mesenterio con electrocoagulación monopolar; Técnica 4: Clipaje del muñón y disección roma y ligadura del mesenterio con endoclip de polímero. Resultados: Se incluyeron 551 pacientes. No se encontraron diferencias en los ANOVAs en cuanto a las características demográficas de los pacientes por cada técnica. Los desenlaces globales fueron: ISO (5,44%), reoperación no planeada (3,08%), readmisión (15,97%) y mortalidad (0,18%). Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p < 0,05) en estos desenlaces explicados por mayores tasas de ISO y reoperación con la Técnica-1. Conclusiones: Los desenlaces globales de la apendicectomía laparoscópica tras la adopción de políticas de reúso de dispositivos médicos se encuentran dentro de los aceptados globalmente cuando se utilizan las Técnicas 2-3-4 en poblaciones equivalentes de pacientes con apendicitis aguda. En este contexto, nuestros resultados invitan a utilizar con precaución la Técnica-1.

Aim: The present study sought to compare the clinical outcomes between four operative techniques for laparoscopic appendectomy in a Colombian institution, following the adoption of reuse and reprocessing policies for medical devices in the Region of Americas (2014). Materials and Methods: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare the rates of Surgical Site Infection (SSI), unplanned reoperation, readmission and mortality (confined to 30 days after surgery) of these operative techniques: Technique 1: Ligature of appendiceal stump with endo stitch plus mesenteric dissection with conventional bipolar electrocoagulation; Technique 2: Clipping of stump with polymer endoclip plus mesenteric dissection with conventional bipolar electrocoagulation; Technique 3: Clipping of stump with polymer endoclip plus mesenteric dissection with monopolar electrocoagulation; Technique 4: Clipping of stump plus mesenteric dissection with polymer endoclip. Results: A total of 551 patients were included. No differences were found in the demographic characteristics of the patients between techniques during ANOVAs. The global outcomes were SSI (5.44%), unplanned reoperation (3.08%), readmission (15.97%) and mortality (0.18%). Significant differences were found (p < 0.05) in these outcomes explained by higher rates of SSI and unplanned reoperation with Technique 1. Conclusions: The overall outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy, after the adoption of policies for the reuse and reprocessing of medical devices, are similar to those accepted globally when using operative techniques 2-3-4 in equivalent populations of patients with acute appendicitis. In this context, our results invite to use with caution technique-1.

Deactivation of SARS-CoV-2 with pulsed-xenon ultraviolet light: Implications for environmental COVID-19 control.

OBJECTIVES: Prolonged survival of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on environmental surfaces and personal protective equipment may lead to these surfaces transmitting this pathogen to others. We sought to determine the effectiveness of a pulsed-xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV) disinfection system in reducing the load of SARS-CoV-2 on hard surfaces and N95 respirators. METHODS: Chamber slides and N95 respirator material were directly inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 and were exposed to different durations of PX-UV. RESULTS: For hard surfaces, disinfection for 1, 2, and 5 minutes resulted in 3.53 log10, >4.54 log10, and >4.12 log10 reductions in viral load, respectively. For N95 respirators, disinfection for 5 minutes resulted in >4.79 log10 reduction in viral load. PX-UV significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 on hard surfaces and N95 respirators. CONCLUSION: With the potential to rapidly disinfectant environmental surfaces and N95 respirators, PX-UV devices are a promising technology to reduce environmental and personal protective equipment bioburden and to enhance both healthcare worker and patient safety by reducing the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Reúso de dispositivos médicos de uso único e implicações para a segurança do paciente / Reuse of single use medical devices and implications for patienty safety / Reutilización de dispositivos médicos de uso individual e implicaciones para la seguridad del paciente

Objetivo: Descrever aspectos do reúso dos dispositivos médicos de uso único e as implicações dessa prática para a segurança do paciente. Método: Ensaio acadêmico, utilizando dados de revisão integrativa e expertise da autora. Resultados: O reúso de produtos de uso único é realidade mundial e ocasiona debates regulatórios, técnicos, econômicos, éticos e de segurança do paciente, denotando diversos interesses dos distintos atores envolvidos: Estado, fabricantes, serviços de saúde, academia, profissionais e usuários. Embora haja risco teórico, dados não identificam relação causal entre evento adverso e reúso desses produtos. Existem argumentos a favor e contra que compreendem riscos e benefícios e justiça distributiva e social. O rótulo desses produtos representa nó crítico e elemento fomentador dos dilemas que permeiam essa prática. Conclusão: Há consenso de que o reúso de um produto médico deve ter o mesmo padrão de segurança, independentemente se rotulado como de uso único ou de multiuso. Alguns produtos ditos de uso único podem ser seguramente reusados, mas essa prática requer condições organoestruturais dos serviços de saúde, além de expertise, adoção de protocolos e supervisão dessas atividades.

Objective: to describe aspects of the reuse of single-use medical devices and implications for patient safety. Method: academic essay, using integrative review data and author's expertise. Results: the reuse of single-use products is a worldwide reality and causes regulatory, technical, economic, ethical and patient safety debates, denoting several interests of the different actors involved: State, manufacturers, health services, academia, professionals and users. Although there is a theoretical risk, data do not identify a causal relationship between adverse events and reuse of these products. There are arguments for and against and are involved: risks and benefits, distributive and social justice. The label of these products represents a critical node and fomenting element of the dilemmas that permeate this practice. Conclusion: There is consensus that the reuse of a medical product should have the same safety standard, regardless of whether labeled as single-use or multipurpose. Some so-called single-use products can be safely reused, but this practice requires organo-structural conditions of health services, as well as expertise, adoption of protocols and supervision of these activities.

Objetivo: Describir aspectos de la reutilización de dispositivos médicos de un solo uso e implicaciones para la seguridad del paciente. Método: ensayo académico, utilizando datos de revisión integradores y la experiencia del autor. Resultados: La reutilización de productos de un solo uso es una realidad mundial y provoca debates regulatorios, técnicos, económicos, éticos y de seguridad del paciente, que denotan diversos intereses de los diferentes actores involucrados: Estado, fabricantes, servicios de salud, academia, profesionales y usuarios. Aunque existe un riesgo teórico, los datos no identifican una relación causal entre el evento adverso y la reutilización de estos productos. Hay argumentos a favor y en contra y están involucrados: riesgos y beneficios, justicia distributiva y social. La etiqueta de estos productos representa un nodo crítico y un elemento que fomenta los dilemas que impregnan esta práctica. Conclusión: Existe un consenso de que la reutilización de un producto médico debe tener el mismo estándar de seguridad, independientemente de si está etiquetado como de uso único o multipropósito. Algunos de los llamados productos de un solo uso pueden reutilizarse de manera segura, pero esta práctica requiere condiciones organoestructurales para los servicios de salud, además de experiencia, adopción de protocolos y supervisión de estas actividades.

The use of germicidal ultraviolet light, vaporized hydrogen peroxide and dry heat to decontaminate face masks and filtering respirators contaminated with a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, the supply of personal protective equipment remains under severe strain. To address this issue, re-use of surgical face masks and filtering facepiece respirators has been recommended; prior decontamination is paramount to their re-use. AIM: We aim to provide information on the effects of three decontamination procedures on porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV)-contaminated masks and respirators, presenting a stable model for infectious coronavirus decontamination of these typically single-use-only products. METHODS: Surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirator coupons and straps were inoculated with infectious PRCV and submitted to three decontamination treatments, ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, vaporized H2O2, and dry heat treatment. Viruses were recovered from sample materials and viral titres were measured in swine testicle cells. FINDINGS: UV irradiation, vaporized H2O2 and dry heat reduced infectious PRCV by more than three orders of magnitude on mask and respirator coupons and rendered it undetectable in all decontamination assays. CONCLUSION: This is the first description of stable disinfection of face masks and filtering facepiece respirators contaminated with an infectious SARS-CoV-2 surrogate using UV irradiation, vaporized H2O2 and dry heat treatment. The three methods permit demonstration of a loss of infectivity by more than three orders of magnitude of an infectious coronavirus in line with the United States Food and Drug Administration policy regarding face masks and respirators. It presents advantages of uncomplicated manipulation and utilization in a BSL2 facility, therefore being easily adaptable to other respirator and mask types.

Microwave- and heat-based decontamination of N95 filtering facepiece respirators: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In pandemics such as COVID-19, shortages of personal protective equipment are common. One solution may be to decontaminate equipment such as facemasks for reuse. AIM: To collect and synthesize existing information on decontamination of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) using microwave and heat-based treatments, with special attention to impacts on mask function (aerosol penetration, airflow resistance), fit, and physical traits. METHODS: A systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020177036) of literature available from Medline, Embase, Global Health, and other sources was conducted. Records were screened independently by two reviewers, and data was extracted from studies that reported on effects of microwave- or heat-based decontamination on N95 FFR performance, fit, physical traits, and/or reductions in microbial load. FINDINGS: Thirteen studies were included that used dry/moist microwave irradiation, heat, or autoclaving. All treatment types reduced pathogen load by a log10 reduction factor of at least three when applied for sufficient duration (>30 s microwave, >60 min dry heat), with most studies assessing viral pathogens. Mask function (aerosol penetration <5% and airflow resistance <25 mmH2O) was preserved after all treatments except autoclaving. Fit was maintained for most N95 models, though all treatment types caused observable physical damage to at least one model. CONCLUSIONS: Microwave irradiation and heat may be safe and effective viral decontamination options for N95 FFR reuse during critical shortages. The evidence does not support autoclaving or high-heat (>90°C) approaches. Physical degradation may be an issue for certain mask models, and more real-world evidence on fit is needed.

Efficacy and safety of disinfectants for decontamination of N95 and SN95 filtering facepiece respirators: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Decontaminating and reusing filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) for healthcare workers is a potential solution to address inadequate FFR supply during a global pandemic. AIM: The objective of this review was to synthesize existing data on the effectiveness and safety of using chemical disinfectants to decontaminate N95 FFRs. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on disinfectants to decontaminate N95 FFRs using Embase, Medline, Global Health, Google Scholar, WHO feed, and MedRxiv. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility and extracted predefined data fields. Original research reporting on N95 FFR function, decontamination, safety, or FFR fit following decontamination with a disinfectant was included. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION: A single cycle of vaporized hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) successfully removes viral pathogens without affecting airflow resistance or fit, and maintains an initial filter penetration of <5%, with little change in FFR appearance. Residual hydrogen peroxide levels following decontamination were within safe limits. More than one decontamination cycle of vaporized H2O2 may be possible but further information is required on how multiple cycles would affect FFR fit in a real-world setting before the upper limit can be established. Although immersion in liquid H2O2 does not appear to adversely affect FFR function, there is no available data on its ability to remove infectious pathogens from FFRs or its impact on FFR fit. Sodium hypochlorite, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, and ethylene oxide are not recommended due to safety concerns or negative effects on FFR function.

Decontaminating N95 and SN95 masks with ultraviolet germicidal irradiation does not impair mask efficacy and safety.

Inadequate supply of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) for healthcare workers during a pandemic such as the novel coronavirus outbreak (SARS-CoV-2) is a serious public health issue. The aim of this study was to synthesize existing data on the effectiveness of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) for N95 FFR decontamination. A systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020176156) was conducted on UVGI in N95 FFRs using Embase, Medline, Global Health, Google Scholar, WHO feed, and MedRxiv. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility and extracted predefined variables. Original research reporting on function, decontamination, or mask fit following UVGI were included. Thirteen studies were identified, comprising 54 UVGI intervention arms and 58 N95 models. FFRs consistently maintained certification standards following UVGI. Aerosol penetration averaged 1.19% (0.70-2.48%) and 1.14% (0.57-2.63%) for control and UVGI arms, respectively. Airflow resistance for the control arms averaged 9.79 mm H2O (7.97-11.70 mm H2O) vs 9.85 mm H2O (8.33-11.44 mm H2O) for UVGI arms. UVGI protocols employing a cumulative dose >20,000 J/m2 resulted in a 2-log reduction in viral load. A >3-log reduction was observed in seven UVGI arms using >40,000 J/m2. Impact of UVGI on fit was evaluated in two studies (16,200; 32,400 J/m2) and no evidence of compromise was found. Our findings suggest that further work in this area (or translation to a clinical setting) should use a cumulative UV-C dose of 40,000 J/m2 or greater, and confirm appropriate mask fit following decontamination.

Dry heat and microwave-generated steam protocols for the rapid decontamination of respiratory personal protective equipment in response to COVID-19-related shortages.

BACKGROUND: In the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and unprecedented global demand, clinicians are struggling to source adequate access to personal protective equipment. Respirators can be in short supply, though are necessary to protect workers from SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Rapid decontamination and reuse of respirators may provide relief for the strained procurement situation. METHOD: In this study, we investigated the suitability of 70°C dry heat and microwave-generated steam (MGS) for reprocessing of FFP2/N95-type respirators, and Type-II surgical face masks. Staphylococcus aureus was used as a surrogate as it is less susceptible than enveloped viruses to chemical and physical processes. RESULTS: We observed >4 log10 reductions in the viability of dry S. aureus treated by dry heat for 90 min at 70°C and >6 log10 reductions by MGS for 90 s. After 3 reprocessing cycles, neither process was found to negatively impact the bacterial or NaCl filtration efficiency of the respirators that were tested. However, MGS was incompatible with Type-II surgical masks tested, as we confirmed that bacterial filtration capacity was completely lost following reprocessing. MGS was observed to be incompatible with some respirator types due to arcing observed around some types of metal nose clips and by loss of adhesion of clips to the mask. CONCLUSION: Considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, we propose a reprocessing personal protective equipment/face mask workflow for use in medical areas.

Microwave-Generated Steam Decontamination of N95 Respirators Utilizing Universally Accessible Materials.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has caused a severe, international shortage of N95 respirators, which are essential to protect health care providers from infection. Given the contemporary limitations of the supply chain, it is imperative to identify effective means of decontaminating, reusing, and thereby conserving N95 respirator stockpiles. To be effective, decontamination must result in sterilization of the N95 respirator without impairment of respirator filtration or user fit. Although numerous methods of N95 decontamination exist, none are universally accessible. In this work, we describe a microwave-generated steam decontamination protocol for N95 respirators for use in health care systems of all sizes, geographies, and means. Using widely available glass containers, mesh from commercial produce bags, a rubber band, and a 1,100-W commercially available microwave, we constructed an effective, standardized, and reproducible means of decontaminating N95 respirators. Employing this methodology against MS2 phage, a highly conservative surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 contamination, we report an average 6-log10 plaque-forming unit (PFU) (99.9999%) and a minimum 5-log10 PFU (99.999%) reduction after a single 3-min microwave treatment. Notably, quantified respirator fit and function were preserved, even after 20 sequential cycles of microwave steam decontamination. This method provides a valuable means of effective decontamination and reuse of N95 respirators by frontline providers facing urgent need.IMPORTANCE Due to the rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there is an increasing shortage of protective gear necessary to keep health care providers safe from infection. As of 9 April 2020, the CDC reported 9,282 cumulative cases of COVID-19 among U.S. health care workers (CDC COVID-19 Response Team, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:477-481, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e6). N95 respirators are recommended by the CDC as the ideal method of protection from COVID-19. Although N95 respirators are traditionally single use, the shortages have necessitated the need for reuse. Effective methods of N95 decontamination that do not affect the fit or filtration ability of N95 respirators are essential. Numerous methods of N95 decontamination exist; however, none are universally accessible. In this study, we describe an effective, standardized, and reproducible means of decontaminating N95 respirators using widely available materials. The N95 decontamination method described in this work will provide a valuable resource for hospitals, health care centers, and outpatient practices that are experiencing increasing shortages of N95 respirators due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Evidence for decontamination of single-use filtering facepiece respirators.

Single-use filtering face respirators (FFRs) are critical pieces of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers treating patients with suspected upper respiratory tract pathogens. Experiences during pandemics in the 2000s, as well as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-2-CoV-2, have highlighted concerns over the pressures that sustained respiratory virus pandemics may have on supplies of FFRs globally. Decontamination of FFRs has been posited as one solution to support the re-use of FFRs with a growing body of literature over the last 10+ years beginning to examine both the efficacy of disinfection of contaminated FFRs but also the impact of the decontamination process on the FFR's performance. Physical and chemical methods of decontamination have been tested for treatment of FFRs with ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, sterilization by steam, ethylene oxide and vaporous hydrogen peroxide, demonstrating the most promising results thus far. Many of these methods utilize existing equipment that may already be available in hospitals and could be re-purposed for FFR decontamination. Importantly, some methods may also be replicated on household equipment, broadening the utility of FFR decontamination across a range of healthcare settings. Utilizing techniques to experimentally contaminate FFRs with a range of microorganisms, most decontamination methods appear to reduce the risk of the mask as a source of infection to the wearer and others to negligible levels. The performance of the filter, especially the efficiency of particle penetration following treatment, varied greatly depending on the processing method as well as the model of the filter itself, however. Urgent regulatory body-supported research is required to endorse the routine decontamination of FFRs. In emergency settings, these methods should nevertheless be carefully considered as one strategy to address potential shortfalls in supplies of FFRs for healthcare workers.

Uso y re-uso de respiradores N95 en estados de escasez / Use and reuse of N95 respirators in states of scarcity

INTRODUCCIÓN: De acuerdo con la Food and Drug Administration (FDA), los respiradores N95, son dispositivos de protección respiratoria diseñados para lograr un ajuste facial y una filtración eficiente de partículas. Estos dispositivos protegen al usuario de partículas contaminantes suspendidas en el aire, como aerosoles, humo o polvo, así como de líquidos. En general, los respiradores N95 tienen una gama amplia de uso que incluye el campo de la construcción, el campo hospitalario, entre otros campos industriales. La denominaión N95 denota dos cosas. La primera de ellas es que, durante las pruebas realizadas por los fabricantes, estos respiradores pueden bloquear al menos 95% de partículas muy pequeñas (tamaño promedio de 0.3 micras). En segundo lugar, estos respiradores no son resistentes a aceites (FDA 2020b). El organismo competente para otorgar una certificación N95 es el National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) el cual forma parte de los Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Por otro lado, dado que un subgrupo de respiradores N95 son diseñados específicamente para el uso en ambientes hospitalarios para proteger tanto al paciente como al profesional de la salud de la transferencia de microorganismos, fluidos corporales y material particulado, la aprobación para comercialización de estos respiradores N95 destinados al uso médico es competencia de la FDA. Esta entidad gubernamental de los Estados Unidos puede autorizar incluso la venta (dentro del territorio americano) de respiradores N95 por fuera de su tiempo de caducidad siempre que hayan sido previamente evaluados y cumplan con las condiciones de almacenamiento requeridas (CDC 2020c). De este modo, los respiradores N95 de uso sanitario son considerados como dispositivos médicos que forman parte del arsenal de equipos de protección personal (EPP) recomendados por distintos organismos internacionales (OMS, CDC, FDA) para protección respiratoria en ambientes hospitalarios (CDC 2020b). Estos dispositivos, en conjunto con otras medidas de prevención, ayudan a reducir el riesgo de infección por agentes biológicos adquiridos por vía respiratoria, como bacterias (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Legionella) o virus (del sarampión, influenza, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-SARS, entre otros) (Balazy et al. 2006; Cascella et al. 2020). METODOLOGÍA Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica que tuvo el objetivo recabar publicaciones científicas y académicas pertinentes al uso prolongado y la reutilización de los respiradores N95. Para ello se buscó sistemáticamente en las principales bases de datos, tales como MEDLINE vía PubMed y en Cochrane Library. Así mismo, se realizó una búsqueda manual en las páginas web de grupos dedicados a la investigación y educación en salud, tales como la World Health Organization (WHO) y Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug administration (FDA) y NIOSH. Finalmente, se buscaron estudios adicionales que pudiesen haber escapado a las búsquedas sistemáticas con una estrategia de "bola de nieve" mediante la revisión de las listas de referencias de los estudios primarios y revisiones narrativas seleccionadas que sean de relevancia. ANALISIS: Este reporte breve de la literatura ha condensado tanto guías de práctica clínica, evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias, así como revisiones narrativas concernientes al uso prolongado y reutilización de los respiradores N95 en el contexto de una pandemia que ha afectado de manera grande los suministros de dichos dispositivos médicos. Este documento busca responder si las estrategias de uso prolongado y reutilización de respiradores N95 tienen un adecuado perfil de seguridad, es decir, que sean estrategias que no incrementen el riesgo de transmisión o infección por virus respiratorios. De la literatura revisada se conoce que las estrategias de uso prolongado y reutilización limitada ya han sido implementadas anteriormente en otros países durante epidemias pasadas ocasionadas por virus respiratorios. En ese sentido, estas prácticas no son ajenas al contexto en el que se encuentran diversos países a causa del COVID-19. La CDC recomienda que ante la escasez de respiradores N95 se considere implementar las estrategias de uso prolongado y re-utilización de dichos dispositivos médicos y que es facultad de cada establecimiento de salud la toma de decisiones respecto a cuál estrategia es más factible de ser implementada. A través del NIOSH, la CDC describe una miríada de medidas preventivas conjuntas que se deben aplicar una vez que se ha decidido implementar las estrategias de uso prolongado o reutilización o ambas. Esto con el objetivo de disminuir al máximo los riesgos de transmisión y auto-inoculación que devienen del contacto con la superficie de un respirador N95 potencialmente contaminado. Dentro de las medidas preventivas más relevantes se encuentran el desechar inmediatamente los respiradores que se encuentren visiblemente dañados o contaminados y lavarse las manos con agua corriente y jabón antes y después de manipular los respiradores. APIC por su parte emite recomendaciones en consonancia con lo expresado por CDC, pero precisa que, entre las dos estrategias, se prefiere el uso extendido por sobre la re-utilización debido a que la primera condiciona una menor manipulación del respirador y por consiguiente conferiría un menor riesgo de transmisión o auto-inoculación. Sin embargo, de tener que reutilizar el respirador, entonces precisa recomendaciones para ello. La evaluación de tecnología sanitaria desarrollado por CADTH revisa y evalúa la evidencia entorno a la seguridad del uso y reutilización de respiradores N95, encontrando evidencia limitada. No obstante, los autores de esta ETS presentan los resultados de un estudio y tres guías de practica clínica que señalan que las prácticas de uso y reutilización de respiradores pueden emplearse en situaciones de escasez de estos dispositivos limitando su reutilización a un máximo de cinco veces consecutivas. La revisión narrativa de la literatura no solo revisa las recomendaciones existentes acerca del uso prolongado y reutilización limitada de los respiradores N95, sino que realiza una revisión y análisis de la literatura publicada para evaluar dichas estrategias desde la perspectiva de cuatro factores que se cree que pueden influenciar el riesgo de transmisión o contagio de patógenos infecciosos durante el uso prolongado o la re-utilización prolongada. Es importante señalar que, al momento, ninguna guía ni estudio ha podido precisar por cuánto tiempo se pueden utilizar prolongadamente los respiradores ni cuántas reutilizaciones se pueden realizar para un mismo respirador. No obstante, la evidencia contenida en los estudios incluidos parece señalar que los profesionales de la salud pueden tolerar largos periodos de tiempo (en promedio 5.8 a 6.6. horas) con los respiradores puesto y que, de necesitarse la reutilización, un margen seguro que garantice que no disminuya la funcionalidad protectora del respirador es de 5 reutilizaciones. CONCLUSIONES Actualmente, existe una escasez de EPP como los respiradores N95 en el mercado nacional e internacional. De este modo, surge la necesidad de evaluar estrategias basadas en evidencia y en experiencia que puedan contribuir a preservar los suministros de estos dispositivos médicos necesarios para la protección de los profesionales de la salud en medio de la pandemia del COVID-19. En primer lugar, se ha observado que tanto la estrategia de uso prolongado como la de reutilización limitada de los respiradores tienen un mínimo riesgo de contagio o transmisión de agentes patógenos a los profesionales de la salud. Por otro lado, de la literatura revisada se puede concluir que es preferible el uso prolongado de los respiradores N95 por sobre la re-utilización limitada para minimizar la manipulación del respirador y en consecuencia reducir al mínimo los riesgos de transmisión y auto-inoculación. En condiciones de desabastecimiento, cuando sea necesario prolongar la vida útil de los respiradores N95 ya distribuidos entre los profesionales de la salud, se puede optar por la re-utilización limitando esta a un máximo de cinco veces por respirador y haciendo énfasis en la implementación de otras medidas preventivas como una adecuada higiene de manos antes y después de la manipulación del respirador, el correcto almacenaje en contenedores limpios y transpirables, y el uso de escudos faciales.

Microbiological surveillance of endoscopes and implications for current reprocessing procedures adopted by an Italian teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Hospital acquired infections have been associated with the contamination of flexible endoscopes caused by a failure of the reprocessing procedure. Microbiological surveillance of endoscope reprocessing is valuable for assessing contamination by pathogens. The aim of this study is to evaluate microbiological contamination of endoscopes after reprocessing, and the involvement of reprocessing procedures adopted in endoscopy units of an Italian teaching-hospital. METHODS: The study was carried out, on several dates in 2014, in 11 endoscopic operation units equipped with 100 endoscopes (18 bronchoscopes, 41 gastroduodenoscopes, 29 colonoscopes, 12 laryngoscopes) and 9 Automated Endoscope Reprocessors. Presence/absence of common pathogens and indicator micro-organisms (including multi-drug resistant bacteria) and Total Microbiological Count (TMC) were obtained from the biopsy channels of endoscopes after reprocessing, from final rinse water of automated endoscope reprocessors and from tap water applying standard microbiological culture methods. Following the European Guidelines for quality assurance in reprocessing, the post-reprocessing criteria were "absence of indicator micro-organisms and absence of TMC in samples obtained from endoscopes' channels". RESULTS: A total of 180 samples were collected (143 endoscopes, 25 Automated Endoscope Reprocessors and 12 water supply). Compliance to the European Guidelines was achieved for 112 out of the 180 (62.2%) samples analyzed. Presence of indicator micro-organisms (mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria) was found in 51 out of 143 endoscopes (35.7%). Multi-drug resistant bacteria were also found. Presence of pathogen micro-organisms was statistically associated with the increase of TMC level, but not with time after reprocessing. CONCLUSION: The study provides information about the microbiological quality of endoscope reprocessing procedures adopted by different endoscopic operation units. The high prevalence of contaminated endoscopes provides evidence of the need to improve the quality of reprocessing.

Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance and surgical outcomes of two different single-use digital flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable video flexible ureteroscope. METHODS: Patients undergoing retrograde flexible ureteroscopy at Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia, were included in this study. Three different flexible ureteroscopes were used in this study: (i) single-use digital LithoVue (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA); (ii) single-use digital PU3022A (Pusen, Zhuhai, China); and (iii) reusable digital URF-V2 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Visibility and maneuverability was rated on a 5-point Likert scale by the operating surgeon. Operative outcomes and complications were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included in the present study. Of these, 141 patients had ureteroscopy for stone treatment, four for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and five for diagnostic/tumor treatment. There were 55 patients in the LithoVue group, 31 in the PU3022A group and 64 patients in the Olympus URF-V2 group. The URF-V2 group had higher visibility scores than both the single-use scopes and higher maneuverability scores when compared with the PU3022A. The LithoVue had higher visibility and maneuverability scores when compared with the PU3022A. There were no differences in operative time, rates of relook flexible ureteroscopes, scope failure or complication rates observed. CONCLUSIONS: Single-use digital flexible ureteroscopes have visibility and maneuverability profiles approaching that of a reusable digital flexible ureteroscope. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes achieve similar clinical outcomes to the more expensive reusable versions.

Reprocessing Single-Use Devices in the Ambulatory Surgery Environment.

Reprocessing single-use surgical supplies and devices is an option for hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The US Federal Government has recognized the practice since 2000, and regulatory oversight has increased dramatically since that time. Reprocessing single-use devices is safe when personnel use approved methods, and health care facilities can experience significant cost savings by participating in this type of initiative. This article explores reprocessing and its benefits in ASCs, including a review of the oversight that the US Food and Drug Administration currently has for reprocessing and a discussion of the results of studies pertaining to this practice. The article also describes some issues that ASC leaders need to be aware of when considering the implementation of a reprocessing program. Single-use device reprocessing can be an effective tool for ASC leaders to conserve and manage resources.