Parent and oncologist perspectives on prognostic disclosure in advanced childhood cancer: communication pearls and pitfalls.

PURPOSE: For children with advanced cancer and their families, communication about prognosis is critical. Unfortunately, data demonstrate that prognostic communication occurs infrequently and inconsistently across advancing illness. Prior to developing an intervention to improve prognostic communication, we aimed to (1) characterize parent and oncologist perspectives on "best" approaches for prognostic communication, and (2) explore similarities and differences between parent and oncologist perspectives. METHODS: Children with poor-prognosis solid tumors, their parents, and oncologists were followed prospectively for 24 months or until death. Matched semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents and oncologists 0-7 days after medical encounters at timepoints of disease progression or relapse. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to describe parent and oncologist impressions of communication quality. RESULTS: A total of 68 interviews were conducted following serial disease reevaluation encounters involving 13 parents and five oncologists. Nine main themes were identified as "best" approaches: (1) speaking with honesty and clarity, (2) leaving room for hope, (3) leaning into a long-standing relationship, (4) personalizing language, (5) empowering the patient and family, (6) collaborating with the multidisciplinary team, (7) providing anticipatory guidance, (8) setting the scene, and (9) creating a therapeutic space. Parents and oncologists generally agreed on themes related to helpful communication approaches, while parents more explicitly described communication pitfalls. CONCLUSION: Parents and oncologists described clear recommendations for helpful communication strategies and pitfalls to avoid during difficult prognostic disclosure. Future work should integrate patient perspectives in the design and testing of an intervention to improve prognostic communication in advanced childhood cancer.

Interdisciplinary Simulation Courses to Train Residents on Communication of Unexpected Complications from Perioperative Care: A Randomized Comparison of Within-Event (Microdebriefing) and Postscenario Debriefing.

INTRODUCTION: Training to disclose bad news in a pluridisciplinary format facilitates communication and improves learning. There are many different debriefing methods described in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the value of final debriefing and microdebriefing with interruptions of the scenario in a simulation program about communication in unexpected complications from perioperative care. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, single center study between October 2018 and July 2019 in a simulation center. Three scenarios were related to patient or family disclosure of complications which had occurred during gynecologic surgery by a dyad involving 2 residents (a gynecology and an anesthesia resident). All sessions involved 6 residents (3 gynecologist and 3 anesthesiologist). The main outcome measure was the immediate residents' self-assessment of the impact of the course on their medical practice immediately after the session. RESULTS: We performed 15 simulation sessions including 80 residents. Thirty-nine residents were included in final debriefing group and 41 in micro-debriefing group. There was no significant difference on the impact for medical practice between groups (9.3/10 in the micro-debriefing group versus 9.2 in the final debriefing group (p = 0.53)). The overall satisfaction was high in the 2 group (9.1/10 in the 2 groups). CONCLUSION: This study is the first one to compare two debriefing methods in case of breaking bad news simulation. No difference between the 2 techniques was found concerning the students' feelings and short and long-term improvement of their communication skills.

How to HEEAL: A Patient and Peer-Centric Simulation Curriculum for Medical Error Disclosure.

Introduction: Medical errors are an unfortunate certainty with emotional and psychological consequences for patients and health care providers. No standardized medical curriculum on how to disclose medical errors to patients or peers exists. The novel HEEAL (honesty/empathy/education/apology-awareness/lessen chance for future errors) curriculum addresses this gap in medical education through a multimodality workshop. Methods: This 6-hour, two-part curriculum incorporated didactic and standardized patient (SP) simulation education with rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP). The morning focused on provider-patient error disclosure; the afternoon applied the same principles to provider-provider (peer) discussion. Summative simulations with SPs evaluated learners' skill baseline and improvement. Formative simulations run by expert simulation educators used RCDP to provide real-time feedback and opportunities for adjustment. Medical knowledge was measured through pre- and postintervention multiple-choice questions. Learners' confidence and attitude towards medical errors disclosure were surveyed pre- and postintervention with assistance of the Barriers to Error Disclosure Assessment tool, revised with the addition of several questions related to provider-provider disclosure. Results: Fourteen medical students participated in this pilot curriculum. Statistical significance was demonstrated in medical knowledge (p = .01), peer-disclosure skills (p = .001), and confidence in medical error disclosure (p < .001). Although there was improvement in patient-disclosure skills, this did not reach statistical significance (p = .05). Discussion: This curriculum addresses the need for designated training in medical error disclosure. Learners gained knowledge, skills, and confidence in medical error disclosure. We recommend this curriculum for medical students preparing for transition to residency.

Etch a Sketch.

This poem imagines being on the receiving end of bad news and seeks the little joys as solace.

Teaching breaking bad news in a gyneco-oncological setting: a feasibility study implementing the SPIKES framework for undergraduate medical students.

BACKGROUND: It is a crucial task for physicians to deliver life threatening information to patients (breaking bad news; BBN). Many aspects influence these conversations on both sides, patients, and doctors. BBN affects the patient-physician relationship, patients' outcome, and physicians' health. Many physicians are still untrained for this multi-facetted task and feel unprepared and overburdened when facing situations of BBN. Therefore, any faculties should aim to integrate communication skills into their medical curricula as early as possible. The SPIKES protocol is an effective framework to deliver BBN. Aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and obstacles of a BBN seminar and its acceptance and learning curve among undergraduate medical students. METHODS: 158 2nd year undergraduate medical students attended a compulsory BBN seminar. The task was to deliver a cancer diagnosis to the patient within a patient - physician role-play in a gyneco-oncological setting before and after a presentation of the SPIKES protocol by the lecturer. The students evaluated important communication skills during these role-plays respectively. Self-assessment questionnaires were obtained at the beginning and end of the seminar. RESULTS: Most students indicated that their confidence in BBN improved after the seminar (p < 0.001). They like the topic BBN to be part of lectures (76%) and electives (90%). Communication skills improved. Lecturer and seminar were positively evaluated (4.57/5). CONCLUSION: The seminar significantly increased confidence and self-awareness in delivering life-threatening news to patients among undergraduate medical students. Important learning aspects of BBN and communication skills could be delivered successfully to the participants within a short time at low costs. The integration of communication skills should be implemented longitudinally into medical curricula starting before clinical education to increase the awareness of the importance of communication skills, to decrease anxiety, stress, and workload for future doctors and- most importantly- to the benefit of our patients.

The Communication of Bad News in Palliative Care: The View of Professionals in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Communication is one of the central axes around which end-of-life care revolves in the context of palliative care. Communication of bad news is reported as one of the most difficult and stressful tasks by palliative care professionals. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify aspects related to the communication of bad news in palliative care in Spain. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study. An ad hoc questionnaire was designed and sent by e-mail to all palliative care teams in Spain. RESULTS: Overall, 206 professionals (102 nurses, 88 physicians and 16 psychologists) completed the questionnaire. A total of 60.2% considered their communication of bad news skills to be good or very good. This was related to older age, experience in both the profession and palliative care, and to having received specific postgraduate training (P < .001). Around 42.2% perform communication of bad news with the patient first, which is associated with lower skill (P = .013). About 78.15% of the professionals do not use any specific protocol. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients access palliative care with little information about their diagnosis and prognosis. The barriers identified in the communication of bad news are the lack of specific education and training in protocol management, the difficult balance between hope and honesty, the young age of the patient, and the family.

How to break bad news and how to learn this skill: results from an international North-Eastern German Society for Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO) survey among physicians and medical students with 1089 participants

BACKGROUND: Delivering bad news to patients is one of the most challenging tasks in medical practice. Despite its great relevance to patients, relatives, and medical staff, there is a paucity of data pertaining to training, experience, expectations, and preferences of physicians and medical students on breaking bad news. METHODS: We conducted an international survey in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria using an online questionnaire among physicians and medical students. RESULTS: A total of 786 physicians and 303 medical students completed the survey. Physicians stated that 32.7% deliver bad news several times a week and 45.2% several times a month. Difficulties controlling their emotions (35.1%) and remaining professional (43.4%) were the greatest challenges for physicians. Delivering bad news is associated with feelings of anxiety, both among experienced physicians (median of 3.8 out of 10.0) and medical students (median of 5.3). Conveying bad news is a burden to physicians and consequently has a substantial impact on their job satisfaction. All participants reported the need for more communication training concerning this subject. Only 49.5% of medical students and 67.3% of physicians mentioned having learned adequate communication skills. Our data demonstrate that communication training decreases the level of anxiety and increases the feeling of self-confidence towards breaking bad news. Preferred educational tools were seminars with simulation (students: 71.4%, physicians: 49.5%), observing more senior faculty (students: 57.4%, physicians: 55.1%), and supervision and feedback sessions (students: 36.3%, physicians: 45.7%). The largest barriers regarding education on communication were limited time (students: 77.0%, physicians: 74.9%) and missing awareness of supervisors (students: 60.6%, physicians: 41.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a great need for systematic training and education in breaking bad news among physicians and medical students. Hospitals, medical schools, and postgraduate training programs are strongly encouraged to fill this gap, and improve sustainable doctor-patient communication to overcome the psychological burden for physicians.

DIAGNOSIS DISCLOSURE RATE AND ITS ASSOCIATIONS AMONG ADOLESCENTS LIVING WITH HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS IN GOMBE METROPOLIS, NIGERIA.

Introduction: Disclosure of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status is one of the major challenges in the management of children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV). With the increasing number of adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) and the peculiarities of the adolescent stage of development, there is a need for local data on the disclosure of HIV status among adolescents living with HIV in our area of practice. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of disclosure of HIV status and its associated factors among Adolescents living with HIV in Gombe Metropolis. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study among 130 ALHIV aged 12-18 years, attending Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) clinics in Federal Teaching Hospital and State Specialist Hospital- Gombe who were recruited consecutively over 10 months. Disclosure of HIV status was assessed using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire in both the adolescents and their respective caregivers. Results: The prevalence of HIV status disclosure by caregivers' report and self-report was 66.2% and 63.1% respectively. Older adolescents' age and a higher level of education were significantly associated with disclosure (p value < 0.05). The commonest reason for disclosure was 'increasing curiosity' 23/130(26.7%) while 'being too young' was the commonest reason for non-disclosure 19/44(43.2%). About half 42/86(48.8%) of the disclosures were done by the mothers while 15/86(17.4%) disclosure processes were carried out by healthcare workers. Conclusion: The disclosure rate was relatively high among ALHIV in the Gombe Metropolis. Caregivers should be encouraged on early disclosure.

Patients' preferences for delivering bad news in palliative care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges for healthcare professionals relates to awareness of patients' preferences relative to how and when to break bad news and how much information should be disclosed in the eventuality of a serious medical diagnosis or prognosis. On occasions, a serious medical diagnosis or prognosis is withheld from the patient. There is a scarcity of evidence about cultural preferences regarding breaking bad news in the palliative care setting in Ethiopia. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the surrounding cultural issues to properly convey bad news. The purpose of the study was to explore Ethiopian patients' cultural preferences for receiving bad news in a palliative care setting. METHODS: A qualitative research approach and nonprobability, purposive sampling method were applied. In-depth interviews were employed to collect data from eight patients who were diagnosed with cancer and cancer with HIV/AIDS during the time of data collection. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes and subthemes. The data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using ATLAS.ti 22 computer software. RESULTS: The following three themes emerged and are reported in this study: (1) Perceptions about life-threatening illness: religious values and rituals are essential for establishing perspectives on life-threatening illnesses and preferences in receiving bad news. (2) Experiences with life-threatening illness: study participants' experience with the method of breaking bad news was sad, and they were not provided with sufficient details about their medical condition. Making appropriate decisions, fulfilling the ordinance of religious faith, and avoiding unnecessary costs were outlined as benefits of receiving bad news. (3) Preferred ways of breaking bad news; the findings revealed that incremental, amiable and empathic methods for delivering bad news were preferred. It was suggested that the presence of family members is crucial when receiving bad news. CONCLUSION: Patients choose to be told about their medical conditions in the presence of their family. However, the patient's needs for receiving bad news were unmet. Patients should be involved in the treatment decision process. Delivery of bad news needs to tailor the preferred methods, cultural values, and religious beliefs. Delivering bad news according to the patients' preferences helps to fulfil their wishes in palliative care.

Adapting Compassionate Conversations for Virtual Mediated Communication.

OBJECTIVE: The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a shift in communication of difficult, emotionally charged topics from almost entirely in-person to virtual mediated communication (VMC) methods due to restrictions on visitation for safety. The objective was to train residents in VMC and assess performance across multiple specialties and institutions. DESIGN: The authors designed a teaching program including asynchronous preparation with videos, case simulation experiences with standardized patients (SPs), and coaching from a trained faculty member. Three topics were included - breaking bad news (BBN), goals of care / health care decision making (GOC), and disclosure of medical error (DOME). A performance evaluation was created and used by the coaches and standardized patients to assess the learners. Trends in performance between simulations and sessions were assessed. SETTING: Four academic university hospitals - Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center in Richmond, Virginia, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus, Ohio, Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas and The University of Cincinnati in Cincinnati, Ohio- participated. PARTICIPANTS: Learners totaled 34 including 21 emergency medicine interns, 9 general surgery interns and 4 medical students entering surgical training. Learner participation was voluntary. Recruitment was done via emails sent by program directors and study coordinators. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement in mean performance on the second compared to the first simulation was observed for teaching communication skills for BBN using VMC. There was also a small but statistically significant mean improvement in performance from the first to the second simulation for the training overall. CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests that a deliberate practice model can be effective for teaching VMC and that a performance evaluation can be used to measure improvement. Further study is needed to optimize the teaching and evaluation of these skills as well as to define minimal acceptable levels of competency.

From threat to challenge-Improving medical students' stress response and communication skills performance through the combination of stress arousal reappraisal and preparatory worked example-based learning when breaking bad news to simulated patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Breaking bad news (BBN; e.g., delivering a cancer diagnosis) is perceived as one of the most demanding communication tasks in the medical field and associated with high levels of stress. Physicians' increased stress in BBN encounters can negatively impact their communication performance, and in the long term, patient-related health outcomes. Although a growing body of literature acknowledges the stressful nature of BBN, little has been done to address this issue. Therefore, there is a need for appropriate tools to help physicians cope with their stress response, so that they can perform BBN at their best. In the present study, we implement the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat as theoretical framework. According to this model, the balance between perceived situational demands and perceived coping resources determines whether a stressful performance situation, such as BBN, is experienced as challenge (resources > demands) or threat (resources < demands). Using two interventions, we aim to support medical students in shifting towards challenge-oriented stress responses and improved communication performance: (1) stress arousal reappraisal (SAR), which guides individuals to reinterpret their stress arousal as an adaptive and beneficial response for task performance; (2) worked examples (WE), which demonstrate how to BBN in a step-by-step manner, offering structure and promoting skill acquisition. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial with a 2 (SAR vs. control) x 2 (WE vs. control) between-subjects design, we will determine the effects of both interventions on stress response and BBN skills performance in N = 200 third-year medical students during a simulated BBN encounter. To identify students' stress responses, we will assess their perceived coping resources and task demands, record their cardiovascular activity, and measure salivary parameters before, during, and after BBN encounters. Three trained raters will independently score students' BBN skills performances. DISCUSSION: Findings will provide unique insights into the psychophysiology of medical students who are tasked with BBN. Parameters can be understood more comprehensively from the challenge and threat perspective and linked to performance outcomes. If proven effective, the evaluated interventions could be incorporated into the curriculum of medical students and facilitate BBN skills acquisition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05037318), September 8, 2021.

Comunicação do Diagnóstico da Síndrome de Down: Experiências de Mães e Médicos / Communication of Down Syndrome Diagnosis: Experiences of Mothers and Doctors / Comunicación del Diagnóstico del Síndrome de Down: Experiencias de Madres y Médicos

O estudo teve como objetivo conhecer as experiências de mães e médicos em relação ao comunicado do diagnóstico da síndrome de Down (SD). Trata-se de uma pesquisa exploratória e transversal, com delineamento qualitativo. Participaram 9 mães e 7 médicos. Foram realizadas 16 entrevistas semiestruturadas individuais. Os dados foram transcritos e submetidos à análise de conteúdo temática. Constatou-se que, para mães e médicos, é uma experiência complexa e difícil, permeada por sentimentos ambivalentes. Nas mães, predominam a tristeza, medo e angústia. A maioria delas sentiram-se insatisfeitas na maneira como receberam o diagnóstico, isso foi atribuído por elas e pelos médicos à falta de preparo durante a formação profissional. Conclui-se que algumas sugestões podem nortear a comunicação do diagnóstico, no intuito de favorecer a elaboração do mesmo, a saber: respeitar o tempo para a mãe observar e conhecer o bebê antes de receber o diagnóstico, comunicar a mãe com sensibilidade e empatia, preferencialmente na presença do outro genitor e de um psicólogo, procurar dar ênfase aos aspectos positivos da saúde do bebê.

The study aimed to know the experiences of mothers and doctors in relation to the statement of the Down syndrome (DS) diagnosis. This is a exploratory and transversal research, with a qualitative design. 9 mothers and 7 doctors participated. 16 individual semi-structured interviews were carried out. The data were transcribed and submitted to thematic content analysis. It was found that for mothers and doctors, it is a complex and difficult experience, permeated by ambivalent feelings. In mothers, sadness, fear and anguish predominate. Most of them felt dissatisfied in the way as they received the diagnosis, this was attributed by them and the doctors to the lack of preparation during vocational training. It is concluded that, some suggestions can guide the communication of the diagnosis, in order to favor its elaboration, namely: respect the time for the mother to observe and get to know the baby before receiving the diagnosis, communicate it to the mother with sensitivity and empathy, preferably in the presence of the other parent and a psychologist, try to emphasize the positive aspects of the baby's health.

El estudio tuvo como objetivo conocer las experiencias de madres y médicos en relación al comunicado del diagnóstico del síndrome de Down (SD). Se trata de una investigación exploratoria y transversal, con delineamiento cualitativo. Participaron 9 madres y 7 médicos. Se realizaron 16 entrevistas semiestructuradas individuales. Los datos fueron transcritos y sometidos al análisis de contenido temático. Se constató que, para madres y médicos, es una experiencia compleja y difícil, impregnada de sentimientos ambivalentes. En las madres predominan la tristeza, el miedo y la angustia. La mayoría de ellas se sintieron insatisfechas en la forma en que recibieron el diagnóstico, eso fue atribuido por ellas y por los médicos a la falta de preparación durante la formación profesional. Se concluye que algunas sugerencias pueden guiar la comunicación del diagnóstico, con el fin de favorecer la elaboración del mismo, a saber: respetar el tiempo para la madre observar y conocer al bebé antes de recibir el diagnóstico, comunicar la madre con sensibilidad y empatía, preferiblemente en presencia del otro progenitor y de un psicólogo, buscar dar énfasis a los aspectos positivos de la salud del bebé.