The deconstructed procedural description in robotic colorectal surgery.

Increasing robotic surgical utilisation in colorectal surgery internationally has strengthened the need for standardised training. Deconstructed procedural descriptions identify components of an operation that can be integrated into proficiency-based progression training. This approach allows both access to skill level appropriate training opportunities and objective and comparable assessment. Robotic colorectal surgery has graded difficulty of operative procedures lending itself ideally to component training. Developing deconstructed procedural descriptions may assist in the structure and progression components in robotic colorectal surgical training. There is no currently published guide to procedural descriptions in robotic colorectal surgical or assessment of their training utility. This scoping review was conducted in June 2022 following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to identify which robotic colorectal surgical procedures have available component-based procedural descriptions. Secondary aims were identifying the method of development of these descriptions and how they have been adapted in a training context. 20 published procedural descriptions were identified covering 8 robotic colorectal surgical procedures with anterior resection the most frequently described procedure. Five publications included descriptions of how the procedural description has been utilised for education and training. From these publications terminology relating to using deconstructed procedural descriptions in robotic colorectal surgical training is proposed. Development of deconstructed robotic colorectal procedural descriptions (DPDs) in an international context may assist in the development of a global curriculum of component operating competencies supported by objective metrics. This will allow for standardisation of robotic colorectal surgical training and supports a proficiency-based training approach.

Operating under the influence: the effect of alcohol on operative performance using a virtual robotic training platform-an experimental comparative cohort study.

An elevated percentage of medical personnel reports using alcohol to relieve stress. Levels of alcohol addiction are almost double that of the general population. Robotic surgery is becoming more widespread. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of alcohol ingestion on performance of a standardized curriculum using a robotic training platform. Surgeons and surgical trainees were recruited. Candidates performed 4 standardized exercises (Vitruvian Operation (VO), Stacking Challenge (SC), Ring Tower (RT), Suture Sponge (SS)) at 0.0 blood alcohol concentration (BAC), followed by testing in the elimination phase at a target BAC of 0.8‰. Learning effects were minimised through prior training. A total of 20 participants were recruited. Scores for RT and SS exercises were significantly worse under the influence of alcohol [instruments out of view (SS (z = 2.012; p = 0.044), RT (z score 1.940, p = 0.049)), drops (SS (z = 3.250; p = 0.001)), instrument collisions (SS (z = 2.460; p = 0.014)), missed targets (SS (z = 2.907; p = 0.004)]. None of the scores improved with alcohol consumption, and there were measurable deleterious effects on the compound indicators risk affinity and tissue handling. Despite the potential mitigating features of robotic surgery including tremor filtration, motion scaling, and improved three-dimensional visualization, alcohol consumption was associated with a significant increase in risk affinity and rough tissue handling, along with a deterioration of performance in select virtual robotic tasks. In the interest of patient safety, alcohol should not be consumed prior to performing robotic surgery and sufficiently long intervals between alcohol ingestion and surgical performance are mandatory.

Learning curves for itinerant nurses to master the operation skill of Ti-robot-assisted spinal surgery equipment by CUSUM analysis: A pilot study.

This study aimed to investigate the minimum number of operations required for itinerant nurses in the operating room to master the skills needed to operate the Ti-robot-assisted spinal surgery equipment. Additionally, we aimed to provide a corresponding basis for the development of qualification admission criteria and skill training for nurses who cooperate with this type of surgery. Nine operating room itinerant nurses independently performed Ti-robot equipment simulations using a spine model as a tool, with 16 operations per trainee. Four evaluation indices were recorded: time spent on equipment preparation and line connections, time spent on image acquisition and transmission, time spent on surgical spine screw placement planning, and time spent on robot arm operation. Individual and general learning curves were plotted using cumulative sum analysis. The number of cases in which the slope of the individual learning curves began to decrease was 3-11 cases, and the number of cases in which the slope of the general learning curve began to decrease was 8 cases. The numbers of cases in which the learning curves began to decrease in the four phases were the 5th, 8th, 11th, and 3rd cases. Itinerant nurses required at least eight cases to master the equipment operation skills of Ti-robot-assisted spinal surgery. Among the four phases, the image acquisition and transmission phases and the surgical spine screw placement planning phase were the most difficult and must be emphasized in future training.

[How I Teach It: Robotic Surgery in the Upper GI Tract]. / How I Teach It: robotische Chirurgie am oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt.

In this manuscript, we present our concept for training in robotic surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The training concept presented here focuses on the two surgical "user groups", assistants (table assists) and specialists (surgeons), and presents the core aspects of training for each group separately.For table assistants, we present opportunities for early involvement in robotics and our approach to learning the first steps in preparing for surgery, assisting during surgery, as well as communication as a key factor in robotic surgery and alternative training.For specialists who are to learn how to perform robotic procedures independently, we discuss virtual training using SimNow Trainer and our preferred early clinical application. We will also present assistance options such as the dual console setup and the telestration system. Finally, we present our training concept for developing robotic surgical skills in the upper gastrointestinal tract through a combination of partial steps and increasing difficulty of the procedures. In our view, it is essential to teach the stepstones of robotic surgery and to master them safely. To this end, training must be structured and regular so that more complex sub-steps and procedures can be taken over step by step.

How long do we need to reach sufficient expertise with the avatera® robotic system?

PURPOSE: To investigate the learning curve in four basic surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, and evaluate the approximate time needed to reach sufficient expertise in performing these tasks with the avatera® system. METHODS: Twenty urology residents with no previous experience in dry-lab and robotic surgery were asked to complete four basic laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer, circle cutting, needle guidance, and suturing) laparoscopically and robotically. All participants were asked to complete the tasks first after watching the Uroweb educational material and, second, after undertaking a 2-hour training in robotic and laparoscopic dry-lab. Thereafter, all trainees continued to undertake 2-hour training programs until being able to complete the tasks with the avatera® robot at the desired time. Paired t test and one-way ANOVA test were used to analyze time differences between the groups. RESULTS: Time needed to complete all tasks either robotically or laparoscopically was significantly less in the second compared to the first attempt for all Groups in each Task. In the robotic dry-lab, time needed to complete the tasks was significantly less than in the laparoscopic dry-lab. A significant effect of previous laparoscopic experience of the participants on the training time needed to achieve most of the goal times was detected. CONCLUSION: The results of the study highlight the role of previous laparoscopic experience in the training time needed to achieve the performance time goals and demonstrate that the learning curve of basic surgical skills using the avatera® system is steeper than the laparoscopic one.

Conception and prospective multicentric validation of a Robotic Surgery Training Curriculum (RoSTraC) for surgical residents: from simulation via laboratory training to integration into the operation room.

There is a lack of training curricula and educational concepts for robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). It remains unclear how surgical residents can be trained in this new technology and how robotics can be integrated into surgical residency training. The conception of a training curriculum for RAS addressing surgical residents resulted in a three-step training curriculum including multimodal learning contents: basics and simulation training of RAS (step 1), laboratory training on the institutional robotic system (step 2) and structured on-patient training in the operating room (step 3). For all three steps, learning content and video tutorials are provided via cloud-based access to allow self-contained training of the trainees. A prospective multicentric validation study was conducted including seven surgical residents. Transferability of acquired skills to a RAS procedure were analyzed using the GEARS score. All participants successfully completed RoSTraC within 1 year. Transferability of acquired RAS skills could be demonstrated using a RAS gastroenterostomy on a synthetic biological organ model. GEARS scores concerning this procedure improved significantly after completion of RoSTraC (17.1 (±5.8) vs. 23.1 (±4.9), p < 0.001). In step 3 of RoSTraC, all participants performed a median of 12 (range 5-21) RAS procedures on the console in the operation room. RoSTraC provides a highly standardized and comprehensive training curriculum for RAS for surgical residents. We could demonstrate that participating surgical residents acquired fundamental and advanced RAS skills. Finally, we could confirm that all surgical residents were successfully and safely embedded into the local RAS team.

Measures of performance and proficiency in robotic assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Robotic assisted surgery (RAS) has seen a global rise in adoption. Despite this, there is not a standardised training curricula nor a standardised measure of performance. We performed a systematic review across the surgical specialties in RAS and evaluated tools used to assess surgeons' technical performance. Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for full texts published on or after January 2020-January 2022. Observational studies and RCTs were included; review articles and systematic reviews were excluded. The papers' quality and bias score were assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Score for the observational studies and Cochrane Risk Tool for the RCTs. The initial search yielded 1189 papers of which 72 fit the eligibility criteria. 27 unique performance metrics were identified. Global assessments were the most common tool of assessment (n = 13); the most used was GEARS (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills). 11 metrics (42%) were objective tools of performance. Automated performance metrics (APMs) were the most widely used objective metrics whilst the remaining (n = 15, 58%) were subjective. The results demonstrate variation in tools used to assess technical performance in RAS. A large proportion of the metrics are subjective measures which increases the risk of bias amongst users. A standardised objective metric which measures all domains of technical performance from global to cognitive is required. The metric should be applicable to all RAS procedures and easily implementable. Automated performance metrics (APMs) have demonstrated promise in their wide use of accurate measures.

The application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in the assessment of basic robotic surgical skills.

BACKGROUND: Using a validated, objective, and standardised assessment tool to assess progression and competency is essential for basic robotic surgical training programmes. Objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) is an error-based assessment tool that provides in-depth analysis of individual technical errors. We conducted a feasibility study to assess the concurrent validity and reliability of OCHRA when applied to basic, generic robotic technical skills assessment. METHODS: Selected basic robotic surgical skill tasks, in virtual reality (VR) and dry lab equivalent, were performed by novice robotic surgeons during an intensive 5-day robotic surgical skills course on da Vinci® X and Xi surgical systems. For each task, we described a hierarchical task analysis. Our developed robotic surgical-specific OCHRA methodology was applied to error events in recorded videos with a standardised definition. Statistical analysis to assess concurrent validity with existing tools and inter-rater reliability were performed. RESULTS: OCHRA methodology was applied to 272 basic robotic surgical skills tasks performed by 20 novice robotic surgeons. Performance scores improved from the start of the course to the end using all three assessment tools; Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) [VR: t(19) = - 9.33, p < 0.001] [dry lab: t(19) = - 10.17, p < 0.001], OCHRA [VR: t(19) = 6.33, p < 0.001] [dry lab: t(19) = 10.69, p < 0.001] and automated VR [VR: t(19) = - 8.26, p < 0.001]. Correlation analysis, for OCHRA compared to GEARS and automated VR scores, shows a significant and strong inverse correlation in every VR and dry lab task; OCHRA vs GEARS [VR: mean r = - 0.78, p < 0.001] [dry lab: mean r = - 0.82, p < 0.001] and OCHRA vs automated VR [VR: mean r = - 0.77, p < 0.001]. There is very strong and significant inter-rater reliability between two independent reviewers (r = 0.926, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: OCHRA methodology provides a detailed error analysis tool in basic robotic surgical skills with high reliability and concurrent validity with existing tools. OCHRA requires further evaluation in more advanced robotic surgical procedures.

Learning curve for robotic rectal cancer resection at a community-based teaching institution.

The surgical management of rectal cancer is shifting toward more widespread use of robotics across a spectrum of medical centers. There is evidence that the oncologic outcomes are equivalent to laparoscopic resections, and the post-operative outcomes may be improved. This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of robotic rectal cancer resections at a community-based teaching institution and evaluate clinical and oncologic outcomes. A retrospective review of consecutive robotic rectal cancer resections by a single surgeon was performed for a five-year period. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) for total operative time was calculated and plotted to establish a learning curve. The oncologic and post-operative outcomes for each phase were analyzed and compared. The CUSUM learning curve yielded two phases, the learning phase (cases 1-79) and the proficiency phase (cases 80-130). The median operative time was significantly lower in the proficiency phase. The type of neoadjuvant therapy used between the two groups was statistically different, with chemoradiation being the primary regimen in the learning phase and total neoadjuvant therapy being more common in the proficiency phase. Otherwise, oncologic and overall post-operative outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. Robotic rectal resections can be done in a community-based hospital system by trained surgeons with outcomes that are favorable and similar to larger institutions.

Skill transference and learning curves in novice learners: a randomized comparison of robotic and laparoscopic platforms.

BACKGROUND: While well-established protocols direct laparoscopic training, there remains a relative paucity of guidelines for robotic education. Furthermore, it is unknown how exposure to one platform influences trainees' proficiency in the other. This study aimed to compare and quantify (1) learning curves and (2) transference of skill between the two modalities in novice learners. METHODS: Thirty pre-clinical medical students were randomized into two groups. One group performed the peg-transfer task using the robot first, followed by laparoscopy, while the other group performed the same task laparoscopically first. Participants completed five repetitions with each methodology. Participants were timed and errors were recorded. We hypothesized that laparoscopic experience with the peg-transfer task would assist in completing the task robotically, and there would be a higher degree of skill transference from the laparoscopic to robotic platform. RESULTS: Peg-transfer task completion was consistently faster and more accurate with the robot compared to laparoscopy (p < 0.01). We observed a positive transference of skill from the laparoscopic to robotic platform. However, exposure to the robot-hindered students' ability to perform the task laparoscopically, evidenced by significantly increased time and errors when compared with baseline laparoscopic performance (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These findings encourage surgical residency programs to treat robotic and laparoscopic training as discrete entities and consider their unique learning curves and skill transference when designing an efficient curriculum. While these effects are observed in novices, future directions include uncovering the trends among resident trainees and practicing surgeons.

Robotic Simulation in Urologic Surgery.

Robotic surgery continues to revolutionize the field of urologic surgery, and thus it is crucial that graduating urologic surgery residents demonstrate proficiency with this technology. The large learning curve of utilizing robotic technology limits resident immediate participation in real-life robotic surgery, and skill acquisition is further challenged by variable case volume. Robotic simulation offers an invaluable opportunity for urologic trainees to cultivate strong foundational skills in a non-clinical setting, ultimately leading to both competence and operative confidence. Several different simulation technologies and robotic assessment protocols have been developed and demonstrate validity in several domains. However, despite their demonstrable utility, there is no formal robotic curricula within US urologic surgery residencies. In this article, we will review the current state of robotic simulation training in urologic surgery and highlight the importance of its widespread utilization in urologic surgery residency training programs.

Identifying barriers to resident robotic console time in a general surgery residency through a targeted needs assessment.

Robotic-assisted general surgery is experiencing exponential growth. Despite our institution's high volume, residents often graduate with inadequate console experience. Our aim was to identify the educational needs of residents and perceived barriers to residents' console time from both attendings and residents. Separate surveys were created and distributed to robotic surgery faculty and general surgery residents at our institution. Questions were a variety of modalities and focused on the robotic surgery experience at our institution, including barriers to resident console time from both attending surgeon and resident perspectives. Although residents' interest in robotic surgery exceeded that of open and laparoscopic surgery, confidence in their robotic skills was low compared to the other modalities. The top barriers to participating in robotic cases according to residents included minimal or no previous console time with the attending, lack of simulator time, and being required to perform bedside assistant duties. Faculty reported resident preparedness, prior robotic skill demonstration, simulator time, case complexity, and their own confidence as significant factors influencing resident console time. Using these results, we concluded that the design and implementation of a formal robotic surgery curriculum should incorporate simulation-based opportunities for residents to practice their skills, improve confidence, and increase console experience. In addition, simulation opportunities for faculty should also be considered to allow for improvement and maintenance of robotic surgical skills.

Effectiveness of a vision-based handle trajectory monitoring system in studying robotic suture operation.

Data on surgical robots are not openly accessible, limiting further study of the operation trajectory of surgeons' hands. Therefore, a trajectory monitoring system should be developed to examine objective indicators reflecting the characteristic parameters of operations. 20 robotic experts and 20 first-year residents without robotic experience were included in this study. A dry-lab suture task was used to acquire relevant hand performance data. Novices completed training on the simulator and then performed the task, while the expert team completed the task after warm-up. Stitching errors were measured using a visual recognition method. Videos of operations were obtained using the camera array mounted on the robot, and the hand trajectory of the surgeons was reconstructed. The stitching accuracy, robotic control parameters, balance and dexterity parameters, and operation efficiency parameters were compared. Experts had smaller center distance (p < 0.001) and larger proximal distance between the hands (p < 0.001) compared with novices. The path and volume ratios between the left and right hands of novices were larger than those of experts (both p < 0.001) and the total volume of the operation range of experts was smaller (p < 0.001). The surgeon trajectory optical monitoring system is an effective and non-subjective method to distinguish skill differences. This demonstrates the potential of pan-platform use to evaluate task completion and help surgeons improve their robotic learning curve.

Adapting to a Robotic Era: The Transferability of Open and Laparoscopic Skills to Robotic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The learning curve of robotic surgical skills is poorly understood. There is a lack of data on the transferability of skills from open and laparoscopic training to robotic surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the impact of training acquired during intern year on the development of robotic skills in general surgery residents, prior to formal robotic training. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2021, novice general surgery residents underwent robotic skill assessment using 3 validated inanimate drills before starting intern year. After completing basic open and laparoscopic proficiency-based curricula, they completed an identical robotic skill assessment at the end of intern year. Pre and post intern year robotic performances were recorded and analyzed by 2 blinded graders. Video-based assessment included completion time, errors, and the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (mOSATS) score. RESULTS: The total time needed to complete all 3 robotic drills decreased from a mean of 26 to 17 minutes after intern year (p < 0.001). The number of errors decreased from a mean of 2.16 to 0.56 errors per subject (p < 0.001). The aggregated mOSATS score increased by an average of 41% (p < 0.001), with a greater increase in technical skill domains compared to the knowledge-based domain. The interrater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline robotic surgical skills are limited without formal training. Our findings suggest that acquiring basic open and laparoscopic skills, such as knot tying, needle driving, and tissue handling results in improved performance on the robotic platform, prior to formal robotic training. Therefore, requiring trainees to complete fundamental open and laparoscopic training prior to robotic training may be an efficient and effective strategy within a surgical residency curriculum.

Home practice for robotic surgery: a randomized controlled trial of a low-cost simulation model.

Pre-operative simulated practice allows trainees to learn robotic surgery outside the operating room without risking patient safety. While simulation practice has shown efficacy, simulators are expensive and frequently inaccessible. Cruff (J Surg Educ 78(2): 379-381, 2021) described a low-cost simulation model to learn hand movements for robotic surgery. Our study evaluates whether practice with low-cost home simulation models can improve trainee performance on robotic surgery simulators. Home simulation kits were adapted from those described by Cruff (J Surg Educ 78(2): 379-381, 2021). Hand controllers were modified to mimic the master tool manipulators (MTMs) on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS). Medical students completed two da Vinci exercises: Sea Spikes 1 (SS1) and Big Dipper Needle Driving (BDND). They were subsequently assigned to either receive a home simulation kit or not. Students returned two weeks later and repeated SS1 and BDND. Overall score, economy of motion, time to completion, and penalty subtotal were collected, and analyses of covariance were performed. Semi-structured interviews assessed student perceptions of the robotic simulation experience. Thirty-three medical students entered the study. Twenty-nine completed both sessions. The difference in score improvement between the experimental and control groups was not significant. In interviews, students provided suggestions to increase fidelity and usefulness of low-cost robotic home simulation. Low-cost home simulation models did not improve student performance on dVSS after two weeks of at-home practice. Interview data highlighted areas to focus future simulation efforts. Ongoing work is necessary to develop low-cost solutions to facilitate practice for robotic surgery and foster more inclusive and accessible surgical education.

Providing a standardised educational programme in robot-assisted gynaecological surgery.

Standardisation of an educational programme in robotic gynaecological surgery requires careful reflection to ensure that the correct surgeons are selected, that they are trained to the best of their ability, and that they have continued education into their careers. The generally agreed pathways included a proficiency-based progression model for procedures with validated assessment tools used for both formative and summative assessment. For new surgeons, a basic and advanced curriculum is required, involving tools on how to use the instruments as well as educational lectures and simulation. For advanced learning, there is a need for proctorship. To maintain their skills, a surgeon should demonstrate a reflective practice and continued good outcomes while adhering to a process of credentialing. Trainers should be validated on their ability to teach based on recognised training-the-trainers courses.

Residents perform better technically, have less stress and workload, and prefer robotic to laparoscopic technique during inanimate simulation.

INTRODUCTION: With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, there is a growing need for surgical residents to be trained by a procedure-specific curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate the technical performance and feedback of surgical residents undergoing the robotic and laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) and gastrojejunostomy (GJ) biotissue modules. METHODS: A total of 23 PGY-3 surgical residents participated in this study and performed the laparoscopic and robotic HJ and GJ drills, which were recorded and scored by two independent graders using the modified objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS). After completing each drill, all participants filled out the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), Borg Exertion Scale, and Edwards Arousal Rating Questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-two (95.7%) residents had already received fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery certification. Eighteen (78.3%) residents had robotic virtual simulation training and the median (range) number of robotic surgery console experience was 4 (0-30). In the HJ comparison of the six OSATS domains, the robotic system was superior in Gentleness (p = 0.031). In the GJ comparison, the robotic system was superior in Time and Motion (p < 0.001), Instrument Handling (p = 0.001), Flow of Operation (p = 0.002), Tissue Exposure (p = 0.013), and Summary (p < 0.001). Participants answered significantly higher demand scores for laparoscopy on all six facets of NASA-TLX for both HJ and GJ (p < 0.05). The Borg Level of Exertion was > 2 points higher for laparoscopic HJ and GJ (p < 0.001). Residents rated more Nervousness and Anxiety for laparoscopic compared to robotic (p < 0.05) HJ and GJ. Additionally, when asked to score preference for robotic and laparoscopic approach in terms of technique and ergonomics, residents scored robot as better (laparoscopy worse) for both HJ and GJ in both domains. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic surgical system provided a more favorable environment for trainees with less mental and physical burden for minimally invasive HJ and GJ curriculum.

Competency assessment for the Versius surgical robot: a validity investigation study of a virtual reality simulator-based test.

BACKGROUND: When introducing new equipment like robotic surgical systems, it is essential to ensure that surgeons have the basic skills before operating on patients. The objective was to investigate the validity evidence for a competency-based test for basic robotic surgical skills using the Versius® trainer. METHODS: We recruited medical students, residents, and surgeons which were classified based on data on clinical experience with the Versius system as either novices (0 min), intermediates (1-1000 min), or experienced (> 1000 min). All participants completed three rounds of eight basic exercises on the Versius trainer, where the first was used for familiarization and the final two for data analysis. The simulator automatically recorded data. Validity evidence was summarized using Messick's framework, and the contrasting groups' standard-setting method was used to define pass/fail levels. RESULTS: 40 participants completed the three rounds of exercises. The discriminatory abilities of all parameters were tested, and five exercises including relevant parameters were selected to be part of the final test. 26 of 30 parameters could differentiate between novices and experienced surgeons but none of the parameters could discriminate between the intermediate and experienced surgeons. Test-retest reliability analysis using Pearson's r or Spearman's rho showed only 13 of 30 parameters had moderate or higher reliability. Non-compensatory pass/fail levels were defined for each exercise and showed that all novices failed all the exercises and that most experienced surgeons either passed or nearly passed all five exercises. CONCLUSION: We identified relevant parameters for five exercises that could be used to assess basic robotic skills for the Versius robotic system and defined a credible pass/fail level. This is the first step in developing a proficiency-based training program for the Versius system.

Experience matters for robotic assistance: an analysis of case data.

Many robotic procedures require active participation by assistants. Most prior work on assistants' effect on outcomes has been limited in procedural focus and scope, with studies reporting differing results. Knowing how assistant experience affects operating room time could inform operating room case scheduling and provide an impetus for additional assistant training. As such, this retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the association between assistant experience and operating room time for 2291 robotic-assisted operations performed from 2016 to 2022 at our institution. Linear regression showed a significant association between the presence of a junior resident and increased case length differential with an increase of 26.9 min (p = 0.01). There were no significant associations between the presence of a senior resident (p = 0.52), presence of a fellow (p = 0.20), or presence of a physician assistant (p = 0.43) and case length differential. The finding of increased operating room time in the presence of a junior resident during robotic cases supports consideration of the adoption of formal assistant training programs for residents to improve efficiency.

Exploring the use of driving simulation to improve robotic surgery simulator training: an observational case-control study.

The correlation between driving skills and the ability to perform robotic surgery have not yet been discussed. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of driving skills on learning robotic surgery using a driving simulator and a robotic simulator. Sixty robot- and simulator-naïve participants were recruited: 30 with a driver's license and 30 without a driver's license. All participants completed a test on the driving simulator and learned four tasks using a robotic surgical simulator (dV-Trainer). On the driving simulator, the lap time in the driver's license group (D-Group) was significantly lower than that in the non-driver's license group (ND-Group) [217.93 ± 42.79 s vs. 271.24 ± 46.63 s, P < 0.001]. The average number of tires off track in the D-Group was lower than that in the ND-Group (0.13 ± 0.35 vs. 0.57 ± 0.63, P = 0.002). The baseline score of the D-Group on the robotic simulator was higher than that of the ND-Group (467.53 ± 107.62 vs. 385.53 ± 136.30, P = 0.022). In the Pick-and-Place-Clutching, Peg-Board-2, and Thread-the-Rings-1 tasks, the learning curve of the D-Group was steeper than that of the ND-Group. However, no significant difference was observed in the Match-Board-2 task. According to the lap time ranking, participants in the top tertile had a steeper learning curve than those in the bottom tertile, especially for the Pick-and-Place-Clutching and Peg-Board-2 tasks (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also found in the baseline and final stages of the Thread-the-Rings-1 task and in the initial stage of the Match-Board-2 task (P < 0.05). Students with a driver's license or better performance in racing games had more success in learning robotic surgery. Driving simulators may promote robotic surgery training.