A descriptive analysis of medicines safety advisories issued by national medicines regulators in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States - 2007 to 2016.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and characteristics of safety advisories issued by medicines regulatory agencies in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US). METHODS: This retrospective analysis examines medicines safety warnings issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Health Canada (HC), the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) from January 1, 2007 until December 31, 2016. A database of warnings obtained from regulators' websites was developed and warnings were classified by communication type, drug, or therapeutic class focus, and the risk discussed. Advisories identifying the same drug or therapeutic class and risk were combined into groups termed "drug-risk issues" for comparisons between regulators. RESULTS: Over this 10-year period, 1441 advisories were identified, with the MHRA issuing the most advisories (MHRA = 469, FDA = 382, HC = 370 TGA = 220). Seventy two percent focussed on single drugs (1034/1441) and 58.7% were alerts (846/1441) posted on the regulators' websites. Diabetes drugs, smoking cessation drugs and immunomodulatory agents were the individual drug types most often subject to safety advisories, while antidepressants, antipsychotics, and proton-pump inhibitors were the top three therapeutic classes. Of 680 identified drug-risk issues, 3.8% (26/680) described a risk of death. By body system, cardiac effects were the most frequent: 10.4% (71/680). CONCLUSION: We found considerable differences in the use of advisories including frequency, communication type, and focus. Disparities in communication about emergent evidence on risks may mean that clinicians and patients in some countries are less well informed about medicine safety concerns than others.

Development and exploratory analysis of software to detect look-alike, sound-alike medicine names.

BACKGROUND: 'Look-alike, sound-alike' (LASA) medicines may be confused by prescribers, pharmacists, nurses and patients, with serious consequences for patient safety. The current research aimed to develop and trial software to proactively identify LASA medicines by computing medicine name similarity scores. METHODS: Literature review identified open-source software from the United States Food and Drug Administration for screening of proposed medicine names. We adapted and refined this software to compute similarity scores (0.0000-1.0000) for all possible pairs of medicines registered in Australia. Two-fold exploratory analysis compared: RESULTS: Screening of the Australian medicines register identified 7,750 medicine pairs with at least moderate (arbitrarily ≥0.6600) name similarity, including many oncology, immunomodulating and neuromuscular-blocking medicines. Computed similarity scores and resulting risk categories demonstrated a modest correlation with the manually-calculated similarity scores (r = 0.324, p < 0.002, 95 % CI 0.119-0.529). However, agreement between the resulting risk categories was not significant (Cohen's kappa = -0.162, standard error = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: The software (LASA v2) has potential to identify pairs of confusable medicines. It is recommended to supplement incident reports in risk-management programs, and to facilitate pre-screening of medicine names prior to brand/trade name approval and inclusion of medicines in formularies.

Update on Therapeutic Protein-Drug Interaction: Information in Labeling.

This review evaluated the significance of therapeutic protein (TP)-drug interactions and the current practices for assessing the interaction potential. We reviewed US FDA labels of approved TPs with drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessment. TP-drug interactions have been evaluated from in vitro studies, animal studies, and/or clinical settings. Of the 150 FDA-approved TPs as of May 2019, 49 TP labels contained pharmacokinetic (PK)-related DDI information derived from at least one study method. Our review found that more than half of the clinical PK DDI evaluations showed no interaction, and no dose adjustment has been recommended for any of the rest TPs. The results and trends observed in this review may further enhance and inform risk-based approaches to evaluating the potential for TP-drug interactions.

Evaluation of color-coded drug labeling to identify endovenous medicines / Evaluación de los etiquetados con código de colores para la identificación de medicamentos endovenosos / Avaliação da rotulagem com código de cores para identificação de medicamentos endovenosos

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the opinion of nursing professionals on the design, practicality of use and the usefulness of color-coded drug labeling in a pediatric intensive care unit. Methods: A cross-sectional study with 42 nursing professionals. A structured questionnaire was used based on a five-level Likert scale. To assess the proportions, a binomial test was used. Results: Concordance ratio >0.8 for all propositions related to design, practicality and most of the propositions related to error prevention. Conclusion: According to the opinion of the nursing team, the implemented technology has an adequate design, as well as being practical and useful in the prevention of medication errors in the population at the ICU.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar la opinión de los profesionales de Enfermería acerca del diseño, la practicidad del uso y la utilidad de los etiquetados con código de colores en una unidad de terapia intensiva pediátrica. Método: Estudio transversal, realizado con 42 profesionales de enfermería. Se utilizó un cuestionario estructurado basado en una escala Likert de cinco niveles. Para el análisis de las proporciones, se utilizó la prueba binomial. Resultados: Se encontró la proporción de concordancia >0,8 para todas las proposiciones relacionadas con el diseño, la practicidad del uso y la mayoría de las proposiciones relacionadas con la prevención de errores. Conclusión: Según la opinión del equipo de enfermería frente al objeto de estudio, la tecnología implementada tiene un diseño adecuado, además de ser práctica y útil en la prevención de errores de medicamentos en población atendida en la UTI.

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a opinião dos profissionais de enfermagem sobre o design, a praticidade do uso e a utilidade da rotulagem com código de cores em uma unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica. Método: Estudo transversal, realizado com 42 profissionais de enfermagem. Utilizou-se um questionário estruturado com base em uma escala Likert de cinco níveis. Para a análise das proporções, utilizou-se o teste binomial. Resultados: Houve proporção de concordância >0,8 para todas as proposições relacionadas ao design, à praticidade do uso e à maioria das proposições relacionadas à prevenção de erros. Conclusão: De acordo com a opinião da equipe de enfermagem, frente ao objeto de estudo, a tecnologia implementada tem design adequado, além de ser prática e útil na prevenção de erros de medicamentos em população atendida na UTI.

Analysis of factors related to the occurrence of important drug-specific postmarketing safety-related regulatory actions: A cohort study focused on first-in-class drugs.

PURPOSE: First-in-class (FIC) drugs with novel modes of action pose concerns regarding important postmarketing safety issues. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors related to the occurrence of postmarketing safety-related regulatory actions (PSRAs) for drugs approved in the United States (US), with a focus on FIC drugs. METHODS: New molecular entities and new therapeutic biologics approved in the United States between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2013 were included in the analysis. Important drug-specific PSRAs were defined as market withdrawal or the addition of new black box warnings or warnings due to adverse drug reactions. The relationship between baseline characteristics and the occurrence of important drug-specific PSRAs was investigated using a multivariate logistic regression model. We also defined the event as the first important PSRA and estimated the time-to-event for each factor. RESULTS: ATC category L (antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents) and FIC drug classification were shown to be statistically significant factors, with odds ratios of 2.15 (95% CI: 1.12-4.11; P = 0.0203) and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.06-3.31; P = 0.0309), respectively. ATC category L and FIC drugs were also significant factors for time to occurrence of the first event. CONCLUSION: FIC designation and ATC category L were identified as factors related to important drug-specific PSRAs. These factors were also associated with the time to occurrence of the first important drug-specific PSRAs.

Outdated Prescription Drug Labeling: How FDA-Approved Prescribing Information Lags Behind Real-World Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug labeling is an authoritative source of information that guides the safe and effective use of approved medications. In many instances, however, labeling may fail to be updated as new information about drug efficacy emerges in the postmarket setting. When labeling becomes outdated, it loses its value for prescribers and undermines a core part of the FDA's mission to communicate accurate and reliable information to patients and physicians. METHODS: We compared the number of drug uses indicated on product labels to the number of uses contained in a leading drug compendium for 43 cancer drugs approved between 1999 and 2011. We defined a "well-accepted off-label use" of a drug as one that was not approved by the FDA and received a category 1 or 2A evidence grade. RESULTS: Of the 43 drugs reviewed in this study, 34 (79%) had at least one well-accepted off-label use. In total, 253 off-label uses were identified; 91% were well accepted, and 65% were in cancer types not previously represented on labeling. Off-patent drugs had more well-accepted off-label uses than brand-name drugs, on average (mean 13.7 vs 3.8, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: The labeling for many cancer drugs, particularly for older drugs, is outdated. Although FDA-approved labeling can never be fully aligned with real-world clinical practice, steps should be taken to better align the two when high-quality data exist. Such steps, if taken, will assist patients and prescribers in discerning which uses of drugs are supported by the highest quality evidence.

Effects of the US Food and Drug Administration Boxed Warning of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents on Utilization and Adverse Outcome.

Purpose In March 2007, a US Food and Drug Administration boxed warning was issued for erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) regarding serious adverse events, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE). We evaluated the US Food and Drug Administration's boxed warning of ESAs used to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia because evidence on the effectiveness of boxed warnings remains inconclusive. Patients and Methods Using 2004 to 2009 SEER-Medicare data, we exploited a natural experiment to examine the effects of ESA boxed warnings on utilization and risk of VTE. The intervention group included Medicare fee-for-services patients diagnosed with colorectal, breast, or lung cancers targeted by this warning and undergoing chemotherapy; the control group included patients with myelodysplastic syndromes not targeted by this warning. The period from January 2004 to September 2006 was used as the prewarning period; the period from April 2007 to September 2009 was used as the postwarning period. The two binary dependent variables included ESA use and hospitalized VTE. Linear probability models with a difference-in-differences specification were used for estimation. Results Our sample consisted of 45,319 unique patients between 2004 and 2009. The trends in ESA use remained similar between the intervention and control groups before the warning, but started declining sharply in the intervention group only after the warning. The trends in hospitalized VTE were relatively stable. Regressions showed that the ESA boxed warning was associated with a 20.2-percentage-point reduction ( P < .001) in the likelihood of ESAs being used to treat cancers targeted by the warning, but not significantly associated with the likelihood of hospitalized VTE. Conclusion Our study showed that the warning was effective in reducing ESA utilization. Future studies should examine other regulatory drug safety actions, such as the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy initiative, whose effectiveness remains unknown.

Uso de medicamentos off-label e não licenciados em unidade de tratamento intensivo neonatal e sua associação com escores de gravidade / Use of off-label and unlicensed drugs in the neonatal intensive care unit and its association with severity scores

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a frequência da prescrição de medicamentos de uso não licenciado (UL) e off-label (OL) em recém-nascidos internados em unidade de tratamento intensivo neonatal de hospital de nível terciário e verificar a associação do seu uso com a gravidade dos pacientes. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional de coorte dos medicamentos prescritos no período de 6 semanas da internação de neonatos, entre julho e agosto de 2011. Os medicamentos foram classificados em UL e OL para dose, frequência, apresentação, faixa etária e indicação, de acordo com bulário eletrônico aprovado pela Food and Drug Administration. Os pacientes foram acompanhados até alta hospitalar ou 31 dias de internação, com registro diário do Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. RESULTADOS: Foram identificados 318 itens de prescrição para 61 pacientes (média de cinco itens/paciente) e apenas 13 pacientes com uso de medicamentos adequados (21%). Identificaram-se prevalências de 7,5% para prescrições UL e de 27,7% para OL. O uso OL mais prevalente foi para medicamentos não padronizados para faixa etária - 19,5%. Computaram-se 57 medicações - um paciente recebeu 10 fármacos UL/OL na internação. A prevalência de usos OL foi maior em prematuros < 35 semanas e nos com escores de gravidade mais elevados (p = 0,00). CONCLUSÕES: A prevalência de neonatos expostos a medicamentos UL/OL durante a internação hospitalar foi elevada, especialmente naqueles com maior escore de gravidade no Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System. Embora haja apreciação geral de que neonatos, especialmente pré-termo, tenham alta taxa de uso de medicamentos, uma avaliação incluindo diferentes culturas e países é necessária para priorizar áreas de pesquisa futura na farmacoterapêutica dessa população vulnerável.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the frequency of unlicensed (UL) and off-label (OL) prescriptions in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital and to determine their association with patients' severity. METHODS: Observational cohort study including drugs prescribed during hospitalization of neonates over a 6-week period between July and August 2011. The drugs were classified as UL and OL for dose, frequency, presentation, age group, or indication, according to an electronic list of drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Patients were followed until hospital discharge or 31 days of hospitalization, with daily records of the Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (NTISS). RESULTS: We identified 318 prescription items for 61 patients (average of five items/patient); there were only 13 patients with appropriate use of medications (21%). A prevalence of 7.5% was identified for UL prescriptions and 27.7% for OL, and the most prevalent OL use was that related to age group - 19.5%. Fifty-seven medications were computed - one patient received 10 UL/OL drugs during hospitalization. The prevalence of OL uses was higher in preterm infants < 35 weeks and in those with higher severity scores (p = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of neonates exposed to UL/OL drugs during hospitalization was high, especially for those with higher NTISS scores. Although there is general appreciation that neonates, especially preterm infants, have a high rate of drug use, an assessment including different cultures and countries is still needed to prioritize areas for future research in the pharmacotherapy of this vulnerable population.

Análise da rotulagem de medicamentos semelhantes: potenciais erros de medicação / Analysis of similar drug labeling: potential medication errors

OBJETIVO: Este trabalho objetivou analisar as embalagens e rótulos de medicamentos, identificando semelhanças entre os mesmos que possam conduzir a erros de medicação passíveis de ocorrer por troca, em diferentes setores da farmácia de um hospital universitário do nordeste do Brasil. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional e transversal, que abrangeu 300 apresentações farmacêuticas, sendo (150 duplas) fotografadas no período de maio a dezembro de 2010. A análise de concordância dos dados referente às fotos de embalagens e rótulos possivelmente semelhantes foi validada utilizando o índice Kappa. RESULTADOS: Do total de medicamentos avaliados (n = 150), cerca de 43 por cento dos "possivelmente semelhantes" estavam na farmácia central (n = 65) e se relacionaram a soluções parenterais de pequeno volume. A força de concordância interobservadores na categoria "muito semelhante entre si" foi considerada "satisfatória" (índice Kappa = 0,584) em 90,66 por cento dos medicamentos avaliados (n = 136). A análise do Kappa geral do estudo foi de 0,488. As variáveis com significância estatística foram: "mesma cor do rótulo ou embalagem", com os respectivos percentuais, tanto para embalagens primárias como secundárias (52 por cento-44 por cento), com p = 0,028. A variável "mesma cor das apresentações farmacêuticas" obteve valores e significância estatística semelhantes à variável anterior. Quanto à variável "mesma disposição dos dizeres", os valores encontrados para ambas as embalagens foram próximas a 50 por cento, com p = 0,001 e, para a variável "mesma cor dos dizeres", os percentuais encontrados foram: (50,7 por cento-44 por cento) (p = 0,008). CONCLUSÃO: Nossos resultados identificaram semelhanças relativas à rotulagem de medicamentos com potencial, principalmente, para erros de dispensação, armazenamento e administração se medidas preventivas não forem adotadas.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine drug packaging and labeling, identifying similarities among them that may lead to medication errors, which may occur by unintentional substitution, in different sectors of the pharmacy of a university hospital in northeastern Brazil. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study, which included 300 pharmaceutical presentations (150 pairs) that were photographed from May to December 2010. Concordance analysis of data related to the pictures of possibly similar packaging and labels was validated using the Kappa index. RESULTS: Of all drugs evaluated (n = 150), about 43 percent of "possibly similar drugs" were in the central pharmacy (n = 65) and were related to small-volume parenteral solutions. The strength of interobserver agreement in the category "very similar to each other" was considered "satisfactory" (Kappa = 0584) in 90.66 percent of the drugs evaluated (n = 136). The overall Kappa analysis of the study was 0.488. Variables with statistical significance were: "same color label or packaging", with the respective percentages for both primary and secondary packaging (52 percent-44 percent), p = 0.028; the variable "same color of drug presentation" obtained similar values and statistical significance to the previous variable; for the variable "same arrangement of words", the values found for both packages were close to 50 percent, p = 0.001; and for the variable "same color of the words", the percentages were: (50.7 percent - 44 percent) (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate similarities related to the labeling of drugs with potential for errors, especially in dispensing, storage, and administration if preventive measures are not adopted.

Inconsistent labeling of food effect for oral agents across therapeutic areas: differences between oncology and non-oncology products.

PURPOSE: Several recent oral oncology drugs were labeled for administration in fasted states despite the fact that food increases their bioavailability. Because this was inconsistent with the principles of oral drug delivery, we hypothesized that there were inconsistencies across therapeutic areas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Oral agents approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from January 2000 to May 2009 were included in our study. Comparison of the food labeling patterns between oncology and non-oncology drugs was made using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 99 drugs evaluated, 34 showed significant food effects on bioavailability. When food markedly enhanced bioavailability, eight out of nine non-oncology drugs were labeled "fed" to take advantage of the food-drug interaction, whereas all oncology drugs (n = 3) were labeled to be administered in "fasted" states (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Drug labeling patterns with respect to food-drug interactions observed with oncology drugs are in contradiction with fundamental pharmacologic principles, as exemplified in the labeling of non-oncology drugs. .

Examination of the relationship between oncology drug labeling revision frequency and FDA product categorization.

OBJECTIVES: I examined the relationship between the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) use of special regulatory designations and the frequency with which labels of oncology drugs are revised to explore how the FDA's designation of products relates to product development and refinement. METHODS: One hundred oncology drugs, designated by the FDA as accelerated approval, priority review, orphan drug, or traditional review, were identified from publicly available information. Drug information for each product was evaluated to assess the rate at which manufacturers revised product labeling. Rates were compared between specially categorized products and traditional review products (e.g., orphan vs nonorphan drugs) to produce revision rate ratios for each special category. RESULTS: Labeling for accelerated approval and priority review products are revised significantly more frequently than are labels for traditional products. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated approval products are approved based on surrogate endpoints; this approval process anticipates subsequent labeling refinement. Priority review products, however, are approved through a process that is ostensibly as rigorous as traditional review. Their higher than expected label revision rate may suggest deficiencies in the FDA's current priority review evaluation processes.

Off-label and unlicensed prescribing for newborns and children in different settings: a review of the literature and a consideration about drug safety.

This review aims to give an updated overview of the worldwide situation of off-label and unlicensed drug use in the paediatric field, also taking into account the safety of this kind of treatment. A Medline and Embase search was performed between 1990 and 2006 and a total of 52 studies were identified and included in the systematic review. From the authors' analysis of the literature, the extent of paediatric unlicensed/off label use is higher in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units and oncology wards, compared with primary care. Moreover, among the nine studies reporting the contribution of an off-label/unlicensed drug use to the occurrence of adverse events, the percentage of unlicensed and/or off-label prescriptions involved in an adverse drug reaction ranged between 23 and 60%. To ensure that children are not exposed to unnecessary risks, controlled clinical trials are required. In addition, future research should be directed towards the identification of individual drugs that cause serious adverse drug reactions and lack product information.

Impact of pharmacometrics on drug approval and labeling decisions: a survey of 42 new drug applications.

The value of quantitative thinking in drug development and regulatory review is increasingly being appreciated. Modeling and simulation of data pertaining to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease progression is often referred to as the pharmacometrics analyses. The objective of the current report is to assess the role of pharmacometrics at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in making drug approval and labeling decisions. The New Drug Applications (NDAs) submitted between 2000 and 2004 to the Cardio-renal, Oncology, and Neuropharmacology drug products divisions were surveyed. For those NDA reviews that included a pharmacometrics consultation, the clinical pharmacology scientists ranked the impact on the regulatory decision(s). Of about a total of 244 NDAs, 42 included a pharmacometrics component. Review of NDAs involved independent, quantitative evaluation by FDA pharmacometricians, even when such analysis was not conducted by the sponsor. Pharmacometric analyses were pivotal in regulatory decision making in more than half of the 42 NDAs. Of the 14 reviews that were pivotal to approval related decisions, 5 identified the need for additional trials, whereas 6 reduced the burden of conducting additional trials. Collaboration among the FDA clinical pharmacology, medical, and statistical reviewers and effective communication with the sponsors was critical for the impact to occur. The survey and the case studies emphasize the need for early interaction between the FDA and sponsors to plan the development more efficiently by appreciating the regulatory expectations better.