Excessive femoral torsion is not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability if TKA is functionally aligned and the patella denervated.

PURPOSE: Recent data suggest that individual morphologic factors should be respected to restore preoperative patellofemoral alignment and thus reduce the likelihood of anterior knee pain. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of excessive femoral torsion (FT) on clinical outcome of TKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA and complete preoperative radiographic evaluation including a long-leg radiograph and CT scan were included. 51 patients showed increased FT of > 20° and were matched for age/sex to 51 controls (FT < 20°). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-eight matched pairs were compared after a 2 year follow-up clinically (Kujala and patellofemoral score for TKA) and radiographically (FT, frontal leg axis, TT-TG, patellar thickness, patellar tilt, and lateral displacement of patella). Functional alignment of TKA was performed (hybrid-technique). All patellae were denervated but no patella was resurfaced. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between clinical scores two years after surgery between patients with normal and excessive FT (n.s.). Kujala score was 64.3 ± 16.7 versus 64.8 ± 14.4 (n.s.), and patellofemoral score for TKA was 74.3 ± 21 versus 78.5 ± 20.7 (n.s.) for increased FT group and control group, respectively. There was no correlation between preoperative FT and clinical scores. Other radiographic parameters were similar between both groups. No correlations between clinical outcomes and preoperative/postoperative frontal leg axis or total leg axis correction were found (n.s.). CONCLUSION: If the leg axis deformity is corrected to a roughly neutral alignment during cemented TKA, including patellar denervation, then excessive FT was not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, level II.

Revision surgery for failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in better disease-specific outcome scores when performed for recurrent instability than for patellofemoral pain or limited range of motion.

PURPOSE: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is an important treatment for recurrent patellar instability. Although complications such as redislocation, patellofemoral pain (PFP) and restricted knee range of motion have been reported, few studies have investigated the results of revision surgery for failed MPFL-R. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the results of the tailored revision surgery after considering the cause of the reconstruction failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, 28 patients (male/female 9/19; age 26.2 ± 6.4 years) underwent revision surgery for failed MPFL-R. The patients were grouped into the "recurrent instability" (SG1) group and "PFP" and/or "restricted range of motion" (SG2) group. Preoperatively, the clinical data, anatomical risk factor profile, and position of the femoral MPFL tunnel were determined for each patient. The Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and numerical analogue scale (NAS 0-10) were administered preoperatively and at the final follow-up for the subjective assessment of the PFP and knee joint function. RESULTS: Overall, the BPII 2.0 score improved from 28.8 ± 16.6 points preoperatively to 68.0 ± 22.7 points (p < 0.0001) postoperatively. SG1 exhibited an increase in the BPII 2.0 score from 28.9 ± 20.2 points to 75.7 ± 23 points (p < 0.0001). PFP decreased from 6.8 ± 2.4 to 1.6 ± 1.9 (p < 0.0001), while the knee joint function increased from 4.3 ± 2.5 to 8.8 ± 1.6 (p < 0.0001). In SG2, the BPII 2.0 score increased from 28.7 ± 12.6 points preoperatively to 57.7 ± 19.7 points (p = 0.0002) postoperatively and was thus significantly lower than that in SG1 (p = 0.038). The intensity of PFP decreased from 6.6 ± 3.0 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 1.9 postoperatively (p = 0.0006), while the subjective knee joint function improved from 3.2 ± 1.4 preoperatively to 7.6 ± 2.3 postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The differences between the groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: Tailored revision surgery for failed MPFL-R significantly improves the patient-reported disease-specific quality of life. The study results indicate that patients undergoing revision surgery as a consequence of patellar redislocation appear to benefit more from revision surgery than those patients undergoing revision due to postoperative PFP and/or a limited knee joint range of motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Outcome and experience of arthroscopic lateral retinacular release combined with lateral patelloplasty in the management of excessive lateral pressure syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have described the effect of full arthroscopic surgery in treatment of excessive lateral pressure syndrome (ELPS). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and experience of total arthroscopic lateral retinacular (LR) release and lateral patelloplasty for the treatment of ELPS. METHODS: A total of 73 patients (88 knees) with ELPS underwent arthroscopic LR release and lateral patelloplasty. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Kujala score, Lysholm scores, patella medial pushing distance, patellar tilt angle (PTA), and lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA) were measured and evaluated before and after surgery. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 12 to 36 months with an average of 24 ± 5.8 months. The VAS was significantly lower at the last follow-up than before surgery (P < 0.01). The patella medial pushing distance, Kujala score, Lysholm score, PTA, and LPFA were significantly higher at the last follow-up than before surgery (P < 0.01, respectively). Years and lateral patella Outerbridge classification at the last follow-up have negative correlation with Kujala score, Lysholm score, Patella medial pushing distance, PTA, and LPFA (P < 0.01, respectively) and have positive correlation with VAS (P < 0.01, respectively). Related complications were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Full arthroscopic LR release combined with lateral patelloplasty in the treatment of ELPS is an effective minimally invasive method, which can effectively correct anomalies of force line and skeleton of patella, relieve pain, and restore knee joint motor function with less complications.

Tibial tubercle transfer leads to clinically relevant improvement in patients with patellar maltracking without instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the different surgical techniques and their outcomes following tibial tubercle transfer (TTT) in patients with patellar maltracking. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or clinical outcome following: TTT in patients with patellar maltracking were included. Collected PROMs were Lysholm, Kujala, IKDC score, and VAS pain. Clinical outcome included reported clinical success, patient satisfaction, complications and removal of hardware (ROH). Overall pre-, post-operative and change scores were estimated using random-effects meta-analysis models. Results were reported as overall mean and per transfer direction. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies and 761 patients (818 knees, mean age 35 years, mean follow-up 5.0 years) were included. In 73% of the studies, surgery was performed after failed conservative treatment. Transfer direction was anteromedial in 76% of all procedures. Overall Lysholm score improved from 61 to 91, Kujala from 52 to 85, IKDC from 53 to 81, and VAS from 6.2 to 2.5, respectively. Clinical success was reported in 79% of patients, and 80% of patients reported to have satisfactory results. Rates of complications and ROH were 13% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TTT for management of patellar maltracking can lead to good results with clinically meaningful improvement, an overall clinical success of 79% and overall patient satisfaction of 80% when appreciating the underlying anatomic condition and using appropriate technique. The level of evidence was low, and large-scale prospective, comparative cohort studies with uniform outcome scales are needed to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Algunas consideraciones sobre la trocleoplastia del fémur / Some considerations on the trochleoplasty of distal femur

La mala alineación patelofemoral tiene múltiples causas anatómicas y una de ellas es la displasia de la tróclea del fémur distal, por lo cual su tratamiento depende de varios factores. Para profundizar en los elementos esenciales de la técnica de trocleoplastia, se realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva donde se analizaron algunos aspectos de interés, a saber: clasificación más empleada para las displasias de la tróclea, elementos imagenológicos más importantes, indicaciones de la técnica quirúrgica, contraindicaciones, principales modalidades de trocleoplastia y vías de acceso quirúrgico. Se concluyó que este es un proceder con indicaciones muy específicas y puede realizarse mediante cirugía abierta o por vía artroscópica.

The poor patellofemoral alignment has multiple anatomical causes and one of them is the dysplasia of the distal femur trochlea, reason why its treatment depends on several factors. To deepen in the essential elements of the trochleoplasty technique, an exhaustive literature review was carried out where some aspects of interest were analyzed, that is: most used classification for the trochlear dysplasias, most important imagenologic elements, indications of the surgical technique, contraindications, main modalities of trochleoplasty and surgical approaches. It was concluded that this is a procedure with very specific indications and can be carried out by means of open surgery or arthroscopic way.

Distal femoral torsional osteotomy increases the contact pressure of the medial patellofemoral joint in biomechanical analysis.

PURPOSE: Torsional osteotomy of the distal femur allows anatomic treatment of patellofemoral instability and patellofemoral pain syndrome in cases of increased femoral antetorsion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of distal femoral torsional osteotomy on pressure distribution of the medial and lateral patellar facet. METHODS: Nine fresh frozen human knee specimens were embedded in custom-made 3D-printed casts and tested with a robotic arm. Torsional osteotomy could be simulated ranging from increased femoral antetorsion of 25° with a corresponding lateralization of the patella to an overcorrected value of 5° of femoral antetorsion. The peak and mean lateral and medial compartment pressure was measured in 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° flexion beginning with neutral anatomic muscle rotation. RESULTS: The medial aspect of the patella showed a significant influence of femoral torsion with an increase of mean and peak pressure in all flexion angles with progressive derotation from 15° external rotation to 5° internal rotation (p = 0.004). The overall pressure difference was highest in near extension and stayed on a constant level with further flexion. On the lateral facet, the derotation resulted in decrease of pressure in near extension; however, it had no significant influence on the mean and peak pressure through the different torsion angles (n.s.). Unlike on the medial facet, a significant consistent increase of peak pressure from 0° to 90° flexion could be shown (p = 0.022) on the lateral patella aspect. CONCLUSION: Distal femoral torsional osteotomy to correct pathological femoral antetorsion leads to a redistribution of retropatellar pressure. External derotation leads to an increased peak pressure on the medial patellar facet and can impair simultaneous cartilage repair. However, as the lateral patellofemoral load decreases, it has a potential in preventing patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Should the meniscal height be considered for preoperative sizing in meniscal transplantation?

PURPOSE AND HYPOTHESIS: In preoperative sizing for meniscal transplantation, most authors take into consideration the length and width of the original meniscus, but not its height. This study aimed at evaluating (1) whether the meniscal height is associated with the meniscal length and width, (2) whether the heights of the meniscal segments are associated with the individual's anthropometric data, (3) whether the heights of the meniscal segments are associated with each other in the same meniscus, and (4) the degree of symmetry of the meniscal dimensions between the right and left knees. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, observational study, two independent radiologists measured the meniscal length, width and height in knee magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained from 25 patients with patello-femoral pain syndrome. Reproducibility of measurements was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients. Associations between the anthropometric data and the meniscal measurements, the meniscal length and width versus height, and the heights of the meniscal segments in the same meniscus were examined with Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: Inter-observer reliability was excellent (>0.8) for length and height and good (0.6-0.8) for width measurements. There was also excellent agreement (>0.8) for the length and width of the menisci in the right and left knees. The heights of the horns of the lateral meniscus showed good agreement (0.6-0.8), while the heights of the other meniscal segments had excellent agreement between the sides (>0.8). There were significant associations with generally low (r < 0.5) correlation between the heights of the meniscal segments and the lengths and widths of the menisci, between the meniscal height and anthropometric data, and between the heights of the meniscal segments in the same meniscus. Correlations between anthropometric data and meniscal length and width were generally high (r > 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: There was excellent agreement between the meniscal dimensions of the right and left knees, and a weak association between the meniscal height with the meniscal width and length, between the height of the menisci with anthropometric data and between the heights of the segments in the same meniscus. The height of the meniscal segments may be a new variable in preoperative meniscal measurement.

Patellofemoral Pain: An Enigma Explained by Homeostasis and Common Sense.

We present a rational, scientific, low-risk approach to patellofemoral pain (anterior knee pain) based on an understanding of tissue homeostasis. Loss of tissue homeostasis from overload and/or injury produces pain. Bone overload and synovial inflammation are common sources of such pain. Chondromalacia and malalignment are findings that almost always do not need to be "corrected" to relieve pain. Patience and persistence in nonoperative care results in consistent success. Surgery should be rare and done only after extensive nonoperative management and in the setting of clearly defined pathology. Rational surgical treatment is explained in the context of restoring tissue homeostasis to relieve pain.

A Systematic Review of 21 Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Studies and More Than 1000 Knees: Indications, Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Reoperations.

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched the literature for tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) studies and systematically reviewed them for indications, clinical outcomes, complications, and reoperations. Therapeutic clinical studies that reported TTO indications, operative findings, and outcomes were included. Quality of each study was assessed with the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS). Twenty-one studies (976 patients, 1055 knees) were included in the analysis. Better quality studies had a mean (SD) MCMS of 19.8 (8.2), well under the 55-point cutoff. TTO was most commonly performed for isolated patellar instability in the presence of knee pain. The other pathologies addressed were patellofemoral osteoarthritis, patella alta, and patella baja with or without knee pain. TTO significantly improved knee pain and clinical outcome scores, though 21% of patients (>1 in 5) required reoperation for hardware removal. Young women with prior surgery on the affected knee were the primary patient population.

Does Patella Tendon Tenodesis Improve Tibial Tubercle Distalization in Treating Patella Alta? A Computational Study.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral malalignment associated with patella alta may cause pain and arthritis; because of this, the condition sometimes is treated surgically. Two common procedures are tibial tubercle distalization with or without patellar tendon tenodesis. However, the biomechanical consequences of these interventions for patella alta are not clearly understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We evaluated changes in patellofemoral joint contact mechanics after tibial tubercle distalization and tibial tubercle distalization combined with patella tendon tenodesis. Specifically, we asked: (1) Are there biomechanical differences between these two types of procedures? (2) Is there an ideal range to distalize the patella? METHODS: Subject-specific finite-element models were created for 10 individuals with patella alta (mean Insall-Salvati ratio of 1.34 ± 0.05). Input parameters for the finite-element models included subject-specific joint geometry, quadriceps muscle forces, and weightbearing patellofemoral joint kinematics. Virtual operations were conducted to simulate the two procedures. For distalization, the tibial tubercle and patella were displaced distally 4 mm to 20 mm in 4-mm increments based on the original model. At each level of distalization, the patella tendon was attached back to its original insertion to simulate the additional tenodesis procedure. Cartilage stress, contact area, and contact forces were quantified and compared between procedures and distalization levels. RESULTS: Distalization and distalization + tenodesis reduced patellofemoral joint stress compared with the baseline of 1.02 ± 0.11 MPa. Distalization led to lower cartilage stress than distalization + tenodesis, and the effect size was relatively large (0.88 ± 0.10 MPa vs 0.92 ± 0.10 MPa; mean difference, 0.04 MPa [95% CI, 0.02 MPa-0.05 MPa], p < 0.01; effect size of 1.64 [Cohen's d], with Insall-Salvati ratio decreased to 0.95). For both procedures, the trend of stress reduction plateaued when the Install-Salvati ratio approached 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage stress appears lower using distalization as opposed to distalization + tenodesis in this finite-element analysis simulation. An Insall-Salvati ratio of 0.95 may be an ideal level for distalization; further distalization does not show additional benefits. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that distalization may result in less stress than distalization + tenodesis, therefore future clinical research might be preferentially directed toward evaluating isolated distalization procedures.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing as a Rescue Procedure for Persistent Anterior Knee Pain After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Our Patients Really Improve?

BACKGROUND: Secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) is a procedure that can be used in patients with persistent anterior knee pain (AKP) after a primary total knee arthroplasty. The aim of our study was to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes as well as the complications of this procedure and identify predictive factors for a favorable outcome. METHODS: Forty-six patients who underwent SPR for persistent AKP after primary total knee arthroplasty were retrospectively studied. The patient's mean age was 68 years (range, 36-86 years). The average follow-up time after SPR was 74 months (range, 24-197 months). Demographic data, Knee Society Score scale, range of motion, pain improvement (Visual Analogue Scale), overall satisfaction, and complications were recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA tm/SE v10. RESULTS: There was an improvement of the Knee Society scale (from 54 ± 11 to 64 ± 16 points; P < .05). However, in 59% of the cases, there was no pain improvement, and 65% of patients were not satisfied. Four patients showed complications, and in 2 cases, reoperation was necessary. We did not find any preoperative predictive factor for a favorable outcome after SPR. CONCLUSION: Despite improvement of the Knee Society scale, many patients continue with AKP and are dissatisfied with this procedure; therefore, we do not recommend it in this clinical scenario.

Revision from unicompartmental to total knee replacement: the clinical outcome depends on reason for revision.

Although it has been suggested that the outcome after revision of a unicondylar knee replacement (UKR) to total knee replacement (TKR) is better when the mechanism of failure is understood, a comparative study on this subject has not been undertaken. A total of 30 patients (30 knees) who underwent revision of their unsatisfactory UKR to TKR were included in the study: 15 patients with unexplained pain comprised group A and 15 patients with a defined cause for pain formed group B. The Oxford knee score (OKS), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) and patient satisfaction were assessed before revision and at one year after revision, and compared between the groups. The mean OKS improved from 19 (10 to 30) to 25 (11 to 41) in group A and from 23 (11 to 45) to 38 (20 to 48) in group B. The mean VAS improved from 7.7 (5 to 10) to 5.4 (1 to 8) in group A and from 7.4 (2 to 9) to 1.7 (0 to 8) in group B. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean improvements in each group for both OKS (p = 0.022) and VAS (p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis in group A, performed in order to define a patient factor that predicts outcome of revision surgery in patients with unexplained pain, showed no pre-operative differences between both subgroups. These results may be used to inform patients about what to expect from revision surgery, highlighting that revision of UKR to TKR for unexplained pain generally results in a less favourable outcome than revision for a known cause of pain.

Clinically insignificant association between anterior knee pain and patellofemoral lesions which are found incidentally.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral chondral lesions are frequently identified incidentally during the arthroscopic treatment of other knee pathologies. A role has been described for arthroscopic debridement when symptoms are known to originate from pathology of the patellofemoral joint. However, it remains unclear how to manage lesions which are found incidentally whilst tackling other pathologies. The purpose of this study was to establish the strength of association between anterior knee pain and patellofemoral lesions identified incidentally in a typical arthroscopic population. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients undergoing arthroscopy for a range of standard indications formed the basis of this cross section study. We excluded those with patellofemoral conditions in order to identify patellofemoral lesions which were solely incidental. Pre-operative assessments were performed on 64 patients, where anterior knee pain was sought by three methods: an annotated photographic knee pain map (PKPM), patient indication with one finger and by palpated tenderness. A single blinded surgeon, performed standard arthroscopies and recorded patellofemoral lesions. Statistical correlations were performed to identify the association magnitude. RESULTS: Associations were identified between incidental patellofemoral lesions and tenderness palpated on the medial patella (P = 0.007, χ(2) = 0.32) and the quadriceps tendon (P = 0.029, χ(2) = 0.26), but these associations were at best fair, which could be interpreted as clinically insignificant. CONCLUSION: Incidental patellofemoral lesions are not necessarily associated with anterior knee pain, we suggest that they could be left alone. This recommendation is only applicable to patellofemoral lesions which are found incidentally whilst addressing other pathology.

Patellar contact pressure changes with anteromedialization of tibial tubercle, lateral release, and new technique for elevating quadriceps tendon: a biomechanical study.

Anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle has been shown to unload contact pressure in the distal and lateral region. No study has evaluated pressures after anteriorization of the quadriceps tendon as a way to decrease contact pressures at the patella. In this controlled laboratory study, six cadaveric knees were tested by placing Fuji pressure film to measure patellar contact area, pressure, and force at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° in the intact state and after anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle, lateral release, and anteriorization of the quadriceps tendon. The addition of anteriorizing the quadriceps tendon decreased patellar contact area and force in the distal and lateral patella more than anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle and lateral release alone, though not in the proximal aspects of the patella as hypothesized.

Shelf syndrome of the knee in elderly people: a report of three cases.

Shelf syndrome occurs mainly in younger people (particularly athletes) and rarely in elderly people. We report on 3 elderly patients with a medial synovial plica causing severe pain and locked knees. They had had no symptoms in their early or middle life. After removal of the shelf, the symptoms improved considerably. Although shelf syndrome is rare in the elderly, it should be suspected whenever severe pain and a locked knee are present.

The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of symptomatic chondromalacia patellae.

PURPOSE: Chondromalacia patella is a distinct clinical entity of abnormal softening of the articular cartilage of the patella, which results in chronic retropatellar pain. Its aetiology is still unclear but the process is thought to be a due to trauma to superficial chondrocytes resulting in a proteolytic enzymic breakdown of the matrix. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation on patients with a proven symptomatic retropatellar lesion who had at least one failed conventional marrow-stimulating therapy. METHODS: We performed chondrocyte implantation on 48 patients: 25 received autologous chondrocyte implantation with a type I/III membrane (ACI-C) method (Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland), and 23 received the Matrix-assisted Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) technique (Genzyme, Kastrup, Denmark). RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up period of 40.3 months, there was a statistically significant improvement in subjective pain scoring using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and objective functional scores using the Modified Cincinnati Rating System (MCS) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chondromalacia patellae lesions responded well to chondrocyte implantation. Better results occurred with MACI than with ACI-C. Excellent and good results were achieved in 40% of ACI-C patients and 57% of MACI patients, but success of chondrocyte implantation was greater with medial/odd-facet lesions. Given that the MACI procedure is technically easier and less time consuming, we consider it to be useful for treating patients with symptomatic chondral defects secondary to chondromalacia patellae.

Review article: Plica syndrome of the knee.

Plica syndrome is a pathological condition secondary to inflammation. Plicae around the knee are common and generally asymptomatic. They often are misdiagnosed. The morphology of knee plicae varies; mediopatellar plicae are the most common cause of the plicae syndrome. An intermittent dull pain is the most common symptom. Diagnosis is made by exclusion. Ultrasonography is useful; arthroscopy is the gold standard. Arthroscopic removal of the plica may be necessary when conservative treatment for up to 6 months fails.

Diagnosis and treatment of excessive lateral pressure syndrome of the patellofemoral joint caused by military training.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnosis and surgical treatment of excessive lateral pressure syndrome of the patellofemoral joint caused by military training. METHODS: Fifteen patients (patient group) and 18 healthy volunteers (control group) were involved in this retrospective study. Radiographs of the knee joints of all patients and volunteers were taken. The bone architecture was assessed, the trochlear angle, coincidence angle and patellofemoral joint index measured in both groups, and the resulting data compared. All 15 patients (17 knees) were treated by lateral collateral retinaculum release. Pre- and post-operative pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The differences between the two groups in coincidence angle (patient group: 7.67°± 5.81°; control group: -2.2°±-2.71°) and patellofemoral joint index (patient group: 2.49 ± 1.40; control group: 1.25 ± 0.15) were statistically significant. Subchondral bone sclerosis and osteophytosis in the patellofemoral joint were more pronounced in the patient group than in the control group. The VAS was higher preoperatively (7.06 ± 0.85) than postoperatively (6 months postoperatively: 3.87 ± 0.24; 1 year postoperatively: 3.01 ± 0.17), and the differences between preoperative and postoperative were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from the case history, typical symptoms and physical signs, X-ray examination is the most basic way to diagnose excessive lateral pressure syndrome of the patellofemoral joint, and the patellofemoral joint index is the most reliable for diagnosis. Lateral collateral retinaculum release with a small-incision is an effective treatment for this disease.

Secondary patellar resurfacing in the treatment of patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: This paper reports a prospective review of patients who, between 2004 and 2007, underwent secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR) due to anterior knee pain after a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim was to evaluate the clinical outcomes obtained with the SPR and to compare them with radiological findings. METHODS: A total of twenty-seven consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. There were twenty-three (85%) women and four (15%) men with a median age of 70 years. The patients were evaluated before and after the surgery with the same functional scores and radiological parameters. Bone scintigraphy was also used in the assessment, and a CT-scan was performed in order to evaluate the femoral component rotation. The median time between TKA and SPR was 18 months. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 23 months, seventeen patients (63%) reported a clear subjective improvement after SPR, and patellofemoral scores (primary outcome measure), KSS and WOMAC (secondary outcome measures) showed a statistically significant improvement following the procedure. There were no significant changes after SPR in the Insall-Salvati ratio, the lateral patellar displacement or the lateral patellar tilt. The mean time between TKA and SPR had no statistically significant effect on outcome. The bone scintigraphy revealed increased patellar uptake in seven cases, but this was not related to subsequent improvement after SPR. Rotational computed tomography showed a median internal rotation of the femoral component of 1º. The complications observed were a patellar component loosening and an acute post-infection. CONCLUSION: No clinical or radiological parameter was found to be related to the final outcome after SPR. There was a discrepancy between functional scale scores and the patient's subjective satisfaction.