Is Sigstad's score really capable of detecting post-surgical late dumping syndrome?

BACKGROUND: This clinical trial explores the Sigstad score for late dumping syndrome in postoperative patients who have undergone sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). The aims of this study are to investigate the correlations with late dumping syndrome, to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Sigstad score and to discuss a modified scoring system. METHODS: The study was conducted at the Obesity Center of the Westküstenklinikum Heide and included 271 patients. Data collection involved conducting interviews, diet diaries and measuring blood glucose levels. Non-parametric tests, logistic regression and McDonald's Omega were the selected statistical approaches. RESULTS: Body Mass Index (BMI) decreased over time (-9.67 kg/m2 at 4 months, -15.58 kg/m2 at 12 months). Preoperatively, the Sigstad score exhibited the highest value, and no occurrences of late dumping syndrome were observed. No significant differences were found in BMI concerning late dumping syndrome or Sigstad score among postoperative patients. Postoperative patients experienced an increase in gastrointestinal symptoms. The reliability test showed a McDonald's omega value of 0.509. The analysis conducted through binary logistic regression indicated dizziness as a significant predictor of late dumping syndrome; however, this finding did not hold up after performing Bonferroni correction. CONCLUSION: The Sigstad score is not a reliable or valid method for detecting late dumping syndrome after surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders. It is necessary to have alternatives that use objective measures and assess the quality of life, and that these alternatives be validated in large patient cohorts.

Incidence and Intensity of Early Dumping Syndrome and Its Association with Health-Related Quality of Life Following Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dumping syndrome (DS) is a shared but underappreciated complication after metabolic-bariatric surgery. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence and intensity of symptoms suggestive of DS and their relationship with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed for all patients with a history of sleeve gastrectomy between July 2017 and July 2022 in our center. Basial clinic statistics were gathered from electronic medical database, the prevalence and severity of DS were assessed by Dumping Symptom Rating Scale (DSRS), and HRQOL is collected through the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). RESULT: In total, 133 of 202 patients completed the questionnaire (response rate 65.8%). A total of 64.7% (N = 86) of participants were female, aged 34.0 (IQR 26.0-39.0) years at completion of the questionnaire, with a mean body mass index of 35.8 (IQR 31.4-40.5) kg/m2. The prevalence of symptoms suggestive of DS was 45.9% (N = 61), and the associated protective factor was the time between surgery and study. Compared with the patients without DS, patients with DS scored significantly worse on four of eight SF-36 subdomains. CONCLUSION: Symptoms suggestive of early dumping syndrome after sleeve gastrectomy are common and are associated with a worse health-related quality of life, which deserves clinical attention. Additional counselling, education, and care are needed to mitigate the decline in quality of life caused by dumping symptoms.

Effectiveness of beinaglutide in a patient with late dumping syndrome after gastrectomy: A case report.

RATIONALE: Dumping syndrome is a frequent and potentially severe complication after gastric surgery. Beinaglutide, a recombinant human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) which shares 100% homology with human GLP-1(7-36), has never been reported in the treatment of dumping syndrome before. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient had undergone distal gastrectomy for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma 16 months ago. He presented with symptoms of paroxysmal palpitation, sweating, and dizziness for 4 months. DIAGNOSIS: He was diagnosed with late dumping syndrome. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: The patient was treated with dietary changes and acarbose for 4 months before admitted to our hospital. The treatment with dietary changes and acarbose did not prevent postprandial hyperinsulinemia and hypoglycemia according to the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on admission.Therefore, the patient was treated with beinaglutide 0.1 mg before breakfast and lunch instead of acarbose. After the treatment of beinaglutide for 1 month, OGTT showed a reduction in postprandial hyperinsulinemia compared with before starting treatment, and the time in the range of 3.9 to 10 mmol/L became 100% in CGM. No side effect was observed in this patient during beinaglutide treatment. LESSONS: These findings suggest that beinaglutide may be effective for treating post-gastrectomy late dumping syndrome.

[Post-meningitis Dumping Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review].

Dumping syndrome has long been associated with gastric surgery. The authors experienced an adult patient presenting with dumping syndrome after meningitis without any previous surgical procedures on the stomach and small bowel. Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system after infective meningitis may originate from postinfectious sequelae or an immunologic mechanism. A comprehensive study and proper management of autonomic symptoms of patients with a central nervous system infection are needed.

International consensus on the diagnosis and management of dumping syndrome.

Dumping syndrome is a common but underdiagnosed complication of gastric and oesophageal surgery. We initiated a Delphi consensus process with international multidisciplinary experts. We defined the scope, proposed statements and searched electronic databases to survey the literature. Eighteen experts participated in the literature summary and voting process evaluating 62 statements. We evaluated the quality of evidence using grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 33 of 62 statements, including the definition and symptom profile of dumping syndrome and its effect on quality of life. The panel agreed on the pathophysiological relevance of rapid passage of nutrients to the small bowel, on the role of decreased gastric volume capacity and release of glucagon-like peptide 1. Symptom recognition is crucial, and the modified oral glucose tolerance test, but not gastric emptying testing, is useful for diagnosis. An increase in haematocrit >3% or in pulse rate >10 bpm 30 min after the start of the glucose intake are diagnostic of early dumping syndrome, and a nadir hypoglycaemia level <50 mg/dl is diagnostic of late dumping syndrome. Dietary adjustment is the agreed first treatment step; acarbose is effective for late dumping syndrome symptoms and somatostatin analogues are preferred for patients who do not respond to diet adjustments and acarbose.

Frequency of Abnormal Glucose Tolerance Test Suggestive of Dumping Syndrome Following Oesophageal Atresia Repair.

OBJECTIVES: Dumping syndrome (DS) is mostly described as a complication of antireflux surgery in oesophageal atresia (OA) but we previously reported 2 cases of DS before any other surgery in infants operated at birth for OA. The objectives of the present study were to assess the prevalence of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 3 months of age in infants operated at birth with type C OA, to describe symptoms and clinical features, and to assess risk factors in infants presenting with abnormal OGTT suggestive of DS. METHODS: A prospective case series study including infants with type C OA without fundoplication, born between 2013 and 2016 in 8 centres was conducted. An OGTT was performed between 2.5 and 3.5 months. Abnormal OGTT was defined as early hyperglycaemia (>1.8 g/L until 30 minutes; >1.7 g/L between 30 minutes and 2 hours; and >1.4 g/L between 2 and 3 hours) and/or late hypoglycaemia (<0.6 g/L after 2 hours). RESULTS: Eleven of the 38 OGTT (29%) showed abnormalities. None of the patients' demographics (birth weight, sex, prematurity, associated malformation, use of enteral nutrition) or conditions of the surgery tested was associated with abnormal OGTT. No clinical sign was specific for it. CONCLUSIONS: DS should be considered in every infant operated at birth for OA presenting with digestive symptoms. No risk factor was predictive for abnormal OGTT. An OGTT to screen for potential DS around 3 months of age should be considered in infants born with EA. CLINICAL TRIAL NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: DUMPING NCT02525705.

Utility of continuous glucose monitoring following gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Glucose fluctuation after gastrectomy represented by dumping syndrome is a well-known post-gastrectomy syndrome that negatively impacts patient quality of life. However, the current methods of post-gastrectomy glucose monitoring do not comprehensively capture the postoperative blood glucose fluctuations that characterize this. METHODS: We used a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system to document the glycemic profiles of patients undergoing gastrectomy and compared these between patients undergoing distal gastrectomy (DG) and total gastrectomy (TG). To evaluate post-gastrectomy syndromes, including dumping syndrome, we used the Post-gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale 37-item questionnaire. The glycemic profiles were also compared using this tool. RESULTS: We studied 57 patients who had undergone DG and 13 who had undergone TG between September 2017 and September 2019. Our results revealed larger diurnal glycemic variability and longer periods of nocturnal hypoglycemia after gastrectomy. The dumping score was worse in the TG than in the DG group (TG 2.4 ± 1.4 vs. DG 1.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.0061). Importantly, 30 of 57 DG patients (52.6%) and 5 of 13 TG patients (38.5%) experienced postprandial hypoglycemia following hyperglycemia without hypoglycemic symptoms. There was no correlation between the dumping symptom score and glycemic variability (ρ = 0.0545, P = 0.6662). CONCLUSIONS: CGM demonstrated diurnal glycemic variability and nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients undergoing gastrectomy. Because some hypoglycemic patients did not develop symptoms and glycemic variability was not necessarily associated with dumping symptom, dumping syndrome must only partially explain the postoperative glucose fluctuations.

Heterogeneity in the Definition and Clinical Characteristics of Dumping Syndrome: a Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: No real consensus regarding the definition of dumping syndrome (DS) seems to exist and few subtyping is used in clinical practice. Knowledge is needed for correct design of trials and establishment of uniform treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to explore the distribution of clinical characteristics related to the subtypes of DS. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in Cochrane, Google Scholar, PubMed, and ResearchGate. Data were collected on the definition and diagnostics of DS used in each study. RESULTS: Twenty-seven clinical trials were included. Seventeen articles clearly provided a definition of DS and ten of these differentiated between early and late DS. Diagnose of DS was based on clinical symptoms (24 articles), hemodynamic parameters (e.g., tachycardia, hypotension; 9 articles), and biochemical analysis (e.g., blood sugar level; 12 articles). Questionnaires were used in 13 articles. A total of 67 different symptoms were correlated with dumping syndrome. Two symptoms were exclusively correlated with early and nine with late DS. Nine articles differentiated between early and late dumping based on timing since the last meal. Hypoglycemia was correlated with late DS in ten articles. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a vast heterogeneity in the definition and clinical characteristics of DS after RYGB. We feel that a standardized definition is required to provide a firm parameter in the evaluation and setup of clinical trials. A better understanding and description of the definition and diagnostic criteria of DS after RYGB is crucial to improve scientific reporting.

Prevalence of Dumping Syndrome After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Comparison with Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Dumping syndrome is a well-known side effect of laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB), and it is commonly believed that dumping syndrome is less likely to occur after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), due to the preservation of the pyloric sphincter. However, it is not uncommon for patients undergoing LSG at our center to report symptoms suggestive of dumping syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of symptoms of dumping syndrome after LSG compared with LRYGB. SETTING: A single surgical group at a high-volume (700 cases per year) Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Center of Excellence. METHODS: One thousand four hundred seventy-one LRYGB (366) and LSG (1105) patients received a questionnaire to assess symptoms of dumping syndrome, utilizing a modified version of the Sigstad scoring system. Dumping syndrome was considered to be present when the questionnaire score exceeded a threshold value. RESULTS: A total of 360 responses were received (249 LSG, 111 LRYGB). 26.5% (66) LSG and 41.4% (46) LRYGB exceeded the threshold for dumping syndrome (p < 0.01). 84.8% (56) LSG and 84.7% (39) LRYGB reported early dumping syndrome (p > 0.05). Thirty-six percent (24) LSG and 28% (13) LRYGB reported late dumping syndrome (p > 0.05). Twenty-seven percent (62) LSG and 44.4% (44) LRYGB reported at least one symptom of dumping syndrome with sweets (p < 0.05). 34.3% (85) LSG and 35.5% (39) LRYGB reported symptoms when drinking with or within 30 min of a meal (p > 0.05). 14.5% (36) LSG and 17.3% (19) LRYGB reported symptoms after alcohol consumption (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dumping syndrome after LSG is prevalent but has not been widely reported. This finding may impact clinicians and patients in their choice of procedure and has relevance in post-operative education and care.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic abdominal pain 5 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of optimal diagnostic workup, etiology, and response to treatment of chronic abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To define the etiology of chronic abdominal pain presenting at the 5-year follow-up after RYGB and to evaluate response to treatment. SETTING: Oslo University Hospital (tertiary referral center for obesity surgery). METHODS: Of 234 patients operated during a randomly selected 12-month period, 165 (71%) returned for 5-year follow-up, and 160 responded to study questionnaires. Of these, 54 (34%) reported chronic abdominal pain and were invited to participate in a structured diagnostic and treatment algorithm. These patients were contacted for the evaluation of their response to treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-one of 54 patients (94%) reporting chronic abdominal pain at the 5-year follow-up were included in the study. Of the 45 patients with onset of symptoms post-RYGB, 28 (62%) underwent one or more radiologic evaluations, 10 (22%) underwent endoscopy, and 13 (29%) underwent laparoscopy. Diagnosis and treatment were established for 34 patients (76%), whereas 11 (24%) had abdominal pain of unknown cause. The most common etiology was internal herniation (n = 6), dumping (n = 6), food intolerance (n = 6), gallstones (n = 5), and irritable bowel syndrome (n = 4). After a median follow-up of 13.0 months (standard deviation, 11.5), 37 (82%) patients reported remission or improvement of symptoms, 6 had unchanged symptoms, and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of long-term chronic abdominal pain post-RYGB is diverse. A multidisciplinary team can help most patients with dedicated follow-up, but a subset of patients has symptoms of unknown etiology.

Transient severe distributive shock due to early dumping syndrome: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Early dumping syndrome characterized by palpitation, dizziness, cold sweat, feebleness, and abdominal symptoms, occurs within 30 minutes after meals in patients who have undergone gastrectomy. This case report describes the case of a patient who presented with severe distributive shock due to early dumping syndrome; he recovered within a few hours after massive fluid infusion and vasopressor administration. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient was a 68-year-old Japanese man who underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and was diagnosed as having late dumping syndrome. On admission, he developed severe shock and was treated with massive fluid administration. Based on the history of the present illness, past medical history, normal findings of blood chemistry test, transient course, and Sigtad score, which helps diagnose dumping syndrome, early dumping syndrome was considered the cause of severe distributive shock. CONCLUSIONS: Early dumping syndrome can cause severe shock requiring massive fluid infusion and vasopressor administration. It should be considered a cause of severe distributive shock in patients who have undergone gastrectomy.

Long-term self-reported symptom prevalence of early and late dumping in a patient population after sleeve gastrectomy, primary, and revisional gastric bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Early and late dumping are side effects of bariatric surgery. Almost no data are available on the prevalence of dumping after different surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of the relative risks of dumping in a large population of patients having undergone primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (pRYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), or revisional RYGB (rRYGB; after removal of band). SETTING: Bariatric center of a teaching hospital. METHODS: In this descriptive cohort study, all patients who underwent a pRYGB (n = 615), SG (n = 157), or rRYGB (n = 274) between 2008 and 2011 were approached by mail and asked to complete and return a questionnaire of general and disease-specific questions related to dumping syndrome. Relative risks (RR) were calculated (mean with 95% confidence intervals) by comparing the prevalence of high suspicion for early and late dumping between different surgical procedure groups and primary gastric bypass surgery. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed and returned by 593 (57%) of 1046 patients. Fewer patients with SG were at high suspicion of early dumping than after pRYGB (RR [95% confidence interval] .46 [.22-.99], P = .049). No differences for early dumping were seen between rRYGB and pRYGB (RR 1.21 [.77-1.91], P = .40). More patients were at high suspicion for late dumping after rRYGB compared with after pRYGB (RR 1.78 [1.09-2.90] P = .021). No differences for late dumping were seen between SG and pRYGB (RR .59 [.22-1.61], P =.30). CONCLUSION: Fewer complaints of early dumping are reported after SG, while patients report more complaints of late dumping after rRYGB compared with pRYGB.

Flushing Disorders Associated with Gastrointestinal Symptoms: Part 2, Systemic Miscellaneous Conditions.

Flushing disorders with involvement of the gastrointestinal tract represent a heterogeneous group of conditions. In part 1 of this review series, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), mast cell activation disorders (MCAD), and hyperbasophilia were discussed. In this section we discuss the remaining flushing disorders which primarily or secondarily involve the gastrointestinal tract. This includes dumping syndrome, mesenteric traction syndrome, rosacea, hyperthyroidism and thyroid storm, anaphylaxis, panic disorders, paroxysmal extreme pain disorder, and food, alcohol and medications. With the exception of paroxysmal pain disorders, panic disorders and some medications, these disorders presents with dry flushing. A detailed and comprehensive family, social, medical and surgical history, as well as recognizing the presence of other systemic symptoms are important in distinguishing the different disease that cause flushing with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Effectiveness of sitagliptin in a patient with late dumping syndrome after total gastrectomy.

An 83-year-old man developed hypoglycemia after undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in 200X-4. The patient was admitted to our hospital in May 200X and placed on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Glycemic excursions were examined while on 3-meal/day (1700kcal) and 6-meal/day (1800kcal) diets. Oxyhyperglycemia followed about 2h later by a sudden drop in glucose levels was seen with both regimens. These findings were consistent with late dumping syndrome. CGM was continued, oral miglitol at 150mg/day or sitagliptin at 50mg/day was started, and glycemic excursions were compared. Results were similar for both drugs, with reductions in postprandial glucose elevations. Meal tolerance testing 3 months after oral sitagliptin, compared to before starting treatment, showed reductions in both early postprandial hyperglycemia and insulin hypersecretion. These findings suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors such as sitagliptin may be effective for treating post-gastrectomy late dumping syndrome.

The Effect of Dumping on Weight Loss in Conversion of Failed Restrictive Surgery: a Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Dumping is currently seen as a negative side effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, it may help patients to comply with their prescribed diet. In this study, we assess the role of dumping on weight loss in patients who have undergone conversion of failed restrictive surgery into RYGB. METHODS: An analysis was performed of 100 consecutive patients who underwent revisional RYGB (rRYGB) between 2006 and 2011 due to inadequate weight loss or band intolerance after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was used to evaluate weight reduction. The Sigstad clinical diagnostic index was used to detect dumping symptoms. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (59.1%) suffered from dumping. Overall, dumpers showed a greater %EWL than non-dumpers (83.8 ± 48.0 vs 66.9 ± 44.1%, respectively, p = 0.0725). When rRYGB was performed because of inadequate weight loss following LAGB, dumping played a crucial role in weight loss (88.0 ± 21.2 vs 68.9 ± 34.5%, p = 0.0137). This effect positively correlates to post-LAGB body mass index (BMI) with a statistically significant result at BMI > 35 kg/m2 (82.4 ± 15.7 vs 58.4 ± 32.4%, p = 0.00341). A regression analysis of the Sigstad dumping score and %EWL shows that dumping tends to increase the %EWL. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insights into the effect of dumping on weight loss in patients who underwent conversion of failed restrictive surgery into RYGB. Based on the findings in our patient group, we suggest that dumping helps patients achieve sustainable weight loss. Therefore, dumping can be regarded as a positive side effect rather than a complication.

[Functional results of digestive tract reconstruction after gastrectomy]. / Funktsional'nye rezul'taty rekonstruktsii pishchevaritel'nogo trakta posle gastréktomii (s kommentariem).

AIM: To substantiate and to prove the advantages of the new method of gastroplasty in comparison with traditional loop reconstruction of digestive tract after gastrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was performed prospective comparative study of surgical treatment of 431 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with different variants of digestive tract reconstruction. The main group (146 patients) consisted of patients in whom original technique including establishment of food reservoir in initial jejunal part during reconstruction was applied. The control group consisted of patients with traditional loop reconstruction of the digestive tract (285 patients). RESULTS: Early dumping syndrome (within 1 year) was diagnosed in 9 (13.2%) patients of the main group and 16 (21.6%) patients of the control group. Mild and moderate degrees of this syndrome were observed in 7 (77.8%) and 10 (62.5%), 2 (22.2%) and 4 (25.0%) patients in the main and control groups respectively. Severe dumping syndrome occurred in 2 (12.5%) patients only in the control group. Late dumping syndrome was revealed in 7 (10.3%) and 11 (14.9%) patients, respectively. Body mass index was 18.7±0.8 and 17.4±0.6 (p<0.05), respectively. After 2 years early dumping syndrome was diagnosed in 6 (14.3%) and 10 (21.3%) patients, mild degree in 5 (83.3%) and 5 (50.0%) patients; moderate degree in 1 (16.7%) and 3 (30.0%). Severe dumping syndrome was confirmed in 2 (20.0%) patients from the control group. Late dumping syndrome occurred in 4 (9.5%) and 7 (14.9%), respectively. Body mass index was 21.2±0.7 and 19.0±0.9 (p<0.05), respectively. After 3 years, early dumping syndrome in mild form was diagnosed in 2 (10.5%) cases and late syndromy in 1 (5.3%) patient of the main group. There were 5 (21.7%) patients with the syndrome in the control group including mild and moderate severity in 3 (60.0%) and 2 (40.0%) patients respectively. Late dumping syndrome occurred in 3 (13.0%) patients. Body mass index was 21.9±1.0 and 19.7±0.6 respectively. CONCLUSION: Food reservoir in the initial part of jejunum after gastrectomy creates better conditions for the normalization of metabolic exchange resulting early functional digestive adaptation, especially in long-term period.

Dumping syndrome after esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.

BACKGROUND: Dumping syndrome, a common complication of esophageal, gastric or bariatric surgery, includes early and late dumping symptoms. Early dumping occurs within 1 h after eating, when rapid emptying of food into the small intestine triggers rapid fluid shifts into the intestinal lumen and release of gastrointestinal hormones, resulting in gastrointestinal and vasomotor symptoms. Late dumping occurs 1-3 h after carbohydrate ingestion, caused by an incretin-driven hyperinsulinemic response resulting in hypoglycemia. Clinical recommendations are needed for the diagnosis and management of dumping syndrome. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed through February 2016. Evidence-based medicine was used to develop diagnostic and management strategies for dumping syndrome. RESULTS: Dumping syndrome should be suspected based on concurrent presentation of multiple suggestive symptoms after upper abdominal surgery. Suspected dumping syndrome can be confirmed using symptom-based questionnaires, glycemia measurements and oral glucose tolerance tests. First-line management of dumping syndrome involves dietary modification, as well as acarbose treatment for persistent hypoglycemia. If these approaches are unsuccessful, somatostatin analogues should be considered in patients with dumping syndrome and impaired quality of life. Surgical re-intervention or continuous enteral feeding may be necessary for treatment-refractory dumping syndrome, but outcomes are variable. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of these diagnostic and treatment recommendations may improve dumping syndrome management.