An exploration of alternative therapeutic targets for aortic disease in Marfan syndrome.

Marfan syndrome is a rare connective tissue disorder that causes aortic dissection-related sudden death. Current conventional treatments, beta-blockers, and type 1 angiotensin II receptor blockers are prescribed to slow down aortic aneurysm progression and delay (prophylactic) aortic surgery. However, neither of these treatments ceases aortic growth completely. This review focuses on potential alternative therapeutic leads in the field, ranging from widely used medication with beneficial effects on the aorta to experimental inhibitors with the potential to stop aortic growth in Marfan syndrome. Clinical trials are warranted to uncover their full potential.

17 ß-Estradiol Impedes Aortic Root Dilation and Rupture in Male Marfan Mice.

Marfan syndrome causes a hereditary form of thoracic aortic aneurysms with worse outcomes in male compared to female patients. In this study, we examine the effects of 17 ß-estradiol on aortic dilation and rupture in a Marfan mouse model. Marfan male mice were administered 17 ß-estradiol, and the growth in the aortic root, along with the risk of aortic rupture, was measured. Transcriptomic profiling was used to identify enriched pathways from 17 ß-estradiol treatments. Aortic smooth muscle cells were then treated with cytokines to validate functional mechanisms. We show that 17 ß-estradiol decreased the size and rate of aortic root dilation and improved survival from rupture. The Marfan transcriptome was enriched in inflammatory genes, and the addition of 17 ß-estradiol modulated a set of genes that function through TNFα mediated NF-κB signaling. In addition, 17 ß-estradiol suppressed the induction of these TNFα induced genes in aortic smooth muscle cells in vitro in an NF-κB dependent manner, and 17 ß-estradiol decreased the formation of adventitial inflammatory foci in aortic roots in vivo. In conclusion, 17 ß-estradiol protects against the dilation and rupture of aortic roots in Marfan male mice through the inhibition of TNFα-NF-κB signaling.

Successful treatment of post-pericardiotomy syndrome via C1 inhibitor replacement therapy in a hereditary angioedema patient with Marfan syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) is caused by dysfunctional C1-INH protein due to mutations in the SERPING1 gene encoding C1-INH. Marfan syndrome is a genetic connective tissue disease that affects the cardiovascular and ocular systems along with the skeletal system. In this case, we present the successful treatment of post-pericardiotomy syndrome unresponsive to classical therapy, which has not been described in the literature. The syndrome developed in a patient with hereditary angioedema (HAE) who underwent open heart surgery due to cardiac involvement in Marfan syndrome. CASE: A nine-year-old male HAE-C1INH patient underwent open heart surgery secondary to cardiac involvement caused by Marfan syndrome. To prevent HAE attacks, 1000 units of C1 inhibitor concentrate therapy were given 2 hours before and 24 hours after the operation. Post-pericardiotomy syndrome was diagnosed on the postoperative second day and ibuprofen 15 mg/kg/day (3 weeks) was started. Since there was no response to classical treatment on the 21st postoperative day, C1 inhibitor concentrate treatment was planned as 1000 units/ dose for 2 days a week considering a prolonged hereditary angioedema attack. In the second week of treatment, complete recovery was achieved for pericardial effusion with a total of 4 doses. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize that in patients with hereditary angioedema undergoing this treatment, care should be taken in terms of complications that may be associated with the disease even if short-term prophylaxis is given before operations and that longer-term use of C1 inhibitor concentrate has a place in treatment.

Drug-based cardiovascular prevention in patients with Marfan Syndrome: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Marfan Syndrome (MFS) is a rare and complex genetic disorder associated with increased aortic growth and aortic disease. The effectiveness of cardiovascular medical therapies aiming to slow down aortic growth has been tested in several trials, particularly beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers, however showing conflicting results. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic review on PubMed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Biomed Central databases between January and February 2022. We selected relevant articles focusing on patients with MFS treated with beta-blockers, angiotensin receptors blockers, or both, and reporting data on the effect of the drugs on 1) slowing down aortic dilatation; 2) the reduction of aortic complication (aortic dissection, mortality, aortic surgery); and with a 3) follow-up length of at least two years. A total of 16 studies were selected. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Beta-blockers remain the mainstay of therapy as they have proven to slow aortic enlargement. Angiotensin receptor blockers are a useful alternative and with proven benefit as an add-on therapy to limit aortic growth. Neither beta-blockers, nor angiotensin receptor blockers have shown meaningful results on clinical aortic endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence of pharmacological treatment for MFS patients is conflicting due to the lack of large, randomized clinical trials with adequate follow-up studies and homogeneous age grouping. Beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are the only available treatments to reduce aortic growth. A recently published patient-level meta-analysis confirmed that angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers have a similar effect on reducing the rate of increase of the aortic root Z score, used singularly or as add-on therapy. Considering the current evidence on new features related with MFS (such as mitral annular disjunction - MAD) bearing a potential additional increased arrhythmic risk, it is of paramount importance to establish the role of beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in clinical endpoints of this population as well.

Short-term rapamycin treatment increases life span and attenuates aortic aneurysm in a murine model of Marfan-Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a genetic disorder leading to medial aortic degeneration and life-limiting dissections. To date, there is no causal prevention or therapy. Rapamycin is a potent and selective inhibitor of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) protein kinase, regulating cell growth and metabolism. The mgR/mgR mice represent an accepted MFS model for studying aortic pathologies to understand the underlying molecular pathomechanisms. This study investigated whether rapamycin inhibits the development of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections in mgR/mgR mice. METHODS: Isolated primary aortic smooth muscle cells (mAoSMCs) from mgR/mgR mice were used for in vitro studies. Two mg kg/BW rapamycin was injected intraperitoneally daily for two weeks, beginning at 7-8 weeks of age. Mice were sacrificed 30 days post-treatment. Histopathological and immunofluorescence analyses were performed using adequate tissue specimens and techniques. Animal survival was evaluated accompanied by periodic echocardiographic examinations of the aorta. RESULTS: The protein level of the phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (p-RPS6), a downstream target of mTOR, was significantly increased in the aortic tissue of mgR/mgR mice. In mAoSMCs isolated from these animals, expression of mTOR, p-RPS6, tumour necrosis factor α, matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 was significantly suppressed by rapamycin, demonstrating its anti-inflammatory capacity. Short-term rapamycin treatment of Marfan mice was associated with delayed aneurysm formation, medial aortic elastolysis and improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term rapamycin-mediated mTOR inhibition significantly reduces aortic aneurysm formation and thus increases survival in mgR/mgR mice. Our results may offer the first causal treatment option to prevent aortic complications in MFS patients.

Angiotensin receptor blockers and ß blockers in Marfan syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and ß blockers are widely used in the treatment of Marfan syndrome to try to reduce the rate of progressive aortic root enlargement characteristic of this condition, but their separate and joint effects are uncertain. We aimed to determine these effects in a collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials of these treatments. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we identified relevant trials of patients with Marfan syndrome by systematically searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from database inception to Nov 2, 2021. Trials were eligible if they involved a randomised comparison of an ARB versus control or an ARB versus ß blocker. We used individual patient data from patients with no prior aortic surgery to estimate the effects of: ARB versus control (placebo or open control); ARB versus ß blocker; and indirectly, ß blocker versus control. The primary endpoint was the annual rate of change of body surface area-adjusted aortic root dimension Z score, measured at the sinuses of Valsalva. FINDINGS: We identified ten potentially eligible trials including 1836 patients from our search, from which seven trials and 1442 patients were eligible for inclusion in our main analyses. Four trials involving 676 eligible participants compared ARB with control. During a median follow-up of 3 years, allocation to ARB approximately halved the annual rate of change in the aortic root Z score (mean annual increase 0·07 [SE 0·02] ARB vs 0·13 [SE 0·02] control; absolute difference -0·07 [95% CI -0·12 to -0·01]; p=0·012). Prespecified secondary subgroup analyses showed that the effects of ARB were particularly large in those with pathogenic variants in fibrillin-1, compared with those without such variants (heterogeneity p=0·0050), and there was no evidence to suggest that the effect of ARB varied with ß-blocker use (heterogeneity p=0·54). Three trials involving 766 eligible participants compared ARBs with ß blockers. During a median follow-up of 3 years, the annual change in the aortic root Z score was similar in the two groups (annual increase -0·08 [SE 0·03] in ARB groups vs -0·11 [SE 0·02] in ß-blocker groups; absolute difference 0·03 [95% CI -0·05 to 0·10]; p=0·48). Thus, indirectly, the difference in the annual change in the aortic root Z score between ß blockers and control was -0·09 (95% CI -0·18 to 0·00; p=0·042). INTERPRETATION: In people with Marfan syndrome and no previous aortic surgery, ARBs reduced the rate of increase of the aortic root Z score by about one half, including among those taking a ß blocker. The effects of ß blockers were similar to those of ARBs. Assuming additivity, combination therapy with both ARBs and ß blockers from the time of diagnosis would provide even greater reductions in the rate of aortic enlargement than either treatment alone, which, if maintained over a number of years, would be expected to lead to a delay in the need for aortic surgery. FUNDING: Marfan Foundation, the Oxford British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence, and the UK Medical Research Council.

Angiotensin Receptor Blockers vs. Beta-Blocker Therapy for Marfan Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Several RCTs have been conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and beta-blocker (BB) therapy for Marfan syndrome (MFS), but the existing evidence is limited and conflicting. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different therapies. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched up to March 2021 to retrieve randomized controlled trials regarding the efficacy and safety of ARB-related (including ARB-only and ARB+BB treatment) and BB-only treatment for treating patients with MFS. The revised risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment. The odds ratio (OR) and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the pooled effect size. RESULTS: Fourteen reports of 9 trials involving 1,449 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding aortic root dilation, the ARB-related regimen has efficacy comparable with that of the BB-only regimen in patients with MFS (pooled SMD = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.33; 0.01]; P = 0.06), while in the ARB+BB vs. BB-only subgroup, a significant difference was observed (pooled SMD = -0.26; 95% CI [-0.40; -0.11]; P < 0.01). In addition, there were no significant differences in other aortic dilation-related measures (aortic root Z scores, ascending aorta, pulmonary artery, aortic annulus, sinotubular junction, aortic arch, thoracic aorta, and abdominal aorta diameter change) or cardiovascular events (aortic dissection, aortic surgery, and death) between the 2 regimens. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the clinical efficacy of ARB-only therapy is not inferior to that of BB-only therapy. Moreover, ARB+BB therapy showed superior therapeutic effects without significant adverse effects.

Appropriate Age for Height Control Treatment in Patients With Marfan Syndrome.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the most appropriate age for height control treatment in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with MFS who underwent height control treatment with estradiol valerate. The estrogen dose was increased according to the height change. The cut-off age for the maximum difference between the expected height and actual final height was evaluated. Results: Seventeen patients were included in this study. The difference between the height predicted by the growth curve and the final height (gcHtD) and that predicted by the bone age and the final height (baHtD) was the largest in the 10.5 years age group (p=0.0045 and p=0.0237, respectively). The gcHtD was 10.6 (10.2, 13.5) cm for patients aged ≤10.5 years, whereas it was 0.6 (-3.65, 5.85) cm for patients aged >10.5 years. The baHtD was 10.1 (7.31, 11.42) cm for patients aged ≤10.5 years, while it was 3.83 (0.84, 6.4) cm for patients aged >10.5 years. When height change was observed for a minimum of 6 months after completion of estrogen treatment, the average growth was 0.6 (0.2, 2.1) cm. Conclusion: Initiating height control treatment before the age of 10.5 years is effective in female patients with MFS.

Síndrome de Marfán en la edad adulta / Marfan's Syndrome

El síndrome de Marfán es una enfermedad que integra el grupo de las llamadas colagenopatías no autoinmunes. Etiológicamente consiste en la mutación del gen que codifica la fibrilina 1, que se encarga junto con otras proteínas como la elastina de formar los microfilamentos de sostén de la matriz celular. Este defecto genera diversas manifestaciones clínicas por trastornos en diferentes sistemas (esquelético, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, ocular). Se presenta un paciente de 43 años de edad, de raza negra, que llegó a la edad adulta sin un diagnóstico de la enfermedad. Incidentalmente sospechamos el diagnóstico al tratar una neumonía adquirida en la comunidad. Se trató su cuadro de neumonía con piperacilina y tazobactam por 7 días. Se recomendó la valoración por parte de cirugía cardiovascular por hallazgos de aneurisma de la aorta ascendente, pero el paciente decidió no continuar con los estudios de su enfermedad. Se aconsejó cambios en el estilo de vida y ejercicios físicos y se diagnosticó alta probabilidad de muerte por el problema vascular descrito(AU)

Marfan's syndrome is a disease that is included in the group of the no autoimmune collagen diseases, the ca use of this syndrome is a mutation in the gen FBN1 that translate the protein fibrillin 1, that is fundamental besides other proteins like elastin to form a part of the extracellular matrix. This defect generates multiple clinical manifestations due to defects in different systems (skeletal, cardiac, big vessels, gastrointestinal, ocular). The reported case is of a patient who reached adulthood without a diagnosis of the diseases, which we incidentally suspect in the context of community acquired pneumonia(AU)

Meta-analysis Examining the Usefulness of Angiotensin Receptor blockers for the Prevention of Aortic Root Dilation in Patients With the Marfan Syndrome.

The Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients are highly predisposed to thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or dissection, with virtually every patient having evidence of aortic disease at some point during their lifetime. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in slowing down the progression of aortic dilatation in MFS patients. PUBMED, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases were searched for relevant articles published from inception to February 1, 2020. We included randomized clinical trials evaluating the effect of ARBs on aortic root size in patients with MFS with a follow-up period of at least 2.5 years. Seven studies were included with a total of 1,510 patients. Our analysis demonstrated a significantly smaller change in aortic root and ascending aorta dilation in the ARBs treated group when compared with placebo (mean difference 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.31 to -0.04; p = 0.04, I2 = 94%, and mean difference -0.13, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.09; p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%, respectively). ARBs as an add-on therapy to beta-blockers resulted in a significantly smaller change in aortic root dilation when compared with the arm without ARBs (mean difference -2.06, 95% CI -2.54 to -1.58; p < 0.00001, I2 = 91%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of clinical events (aortic complications/surgery) observed in the ARBs arm when compared with placebo (Risk ratio of 1.01, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.38; p = 0.94, I2 = 0%). In conclusion, ARBs therapy is associated with a slower progression of aortic root dilation when compared with placebo and as an addition to beta-blocker therapy.

Repurposing of drugs approved for cardiovascular diseases: Opportunity or mirage?

Drug repurposing is a promising way in drug discovery to identify new therapeutic uses -different from the original medical indication- for existing drugs. It has many advantages over traditional approaches to de novo drug discovery, since it can significantly reduce healthcare costs and development timeline. In this review, we discuss the possible repurposing of drugs approved for cardiovascular diseases, such as ß-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), statins, aspirin, cardiac glycosides and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Indeed, numerous experimental and epidemiological studies have reported promising anti-cancer activities for these drugs. It is worth mentioning, however, that the results of these studies are often controversial and very few data were obtained by controlled prospective clinical trials. Therefore, no final conclusion has yet been reached in this area and no final recommendations can be made. Moreover, ß-blockers, ARBs and statins showed promising results in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where pathological conditions other than cancer were considered. The results obtained have led or may lead to new indications for these drugs. For each drug or class of drugs, the potential molecular mechanisms of action justifying repurposing, results obtained in vitro and in animal models and data from epidemiological and randomized studies are described.

The effects of losartan versus beta-blockers on cardiovascular protection in marfan syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Variable effects of beta-blockers (BB) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) were reported to retard aortic root growth in Marfan syndrome (MFS). This study aimed to compare the effects of BB therapy and ARB-related therapies on cardiovascular protection in MFS. METHODS: Studies of randomized control trials comparing the efficacy of only-BB and ARB-related (only-ARB or ARB-plus-BB) therapies for MFS published before July 31, 2018 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were selected. The outcomes included changes in aortic growth and cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Eight trials involving 1381 patients were included. Patients received only-BB and ARB-related therapies did not differ significantly in changes in aortic growth (aortic root diameter: standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.11-0.19, p = 0.63) or cardiovascular events (aortic dissection: Peto odds ratio [OR] = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.42-6.72, p = 0.47; aortic surgery: risk ratio = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.66-1.41, p = 0.86; death: Peto OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 0.39-19.82, p = 0.31). Subgroup analysis revealed that ARB-plus-BB therapy exhibited nonsignificantly better outcomes than only-BB therapy (aortic root diameter: SMD = 0.11, 95% CI: -0.22-0.45, p = 0.52; ascending aorta diameter: SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.07-0.27, p = 0.26; aortic surgery: Peto OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.75-1.61, p = 0.62). CONCLUSION: For cardiovascular protection in MFS, only-ARB therapy is not inferior to only-BB therapy. Moreover, the outcomes of ARB-plus-BB therapy seemed to be favourable to those of only-BB therapy.

The Potential Beneficial Effects of Resveratrol on Cardiovascular Complications in Marfan Syndrome Patients⁻Insights from Rodent-Based Animal Studies.

Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients are at risk for cardiovascular disease. In particular, for aortic aneurysm formation, which ultimately can result in a life-threatening aortic dissection or rupture. Over the years, research into a sufficient pharmacological treatment option against aortopathy has expanded, mostly due to the development of rodent disease models for aneurysm formation and dissections. Unfortunately, no optimal treatment strategy has yet been identified for MFS. The biologically-potent polyphenol resveratrol (RES), that occurs in nuts, plants, and the skin of grapes, was shown to have a positive effect on aortic repair in various rodent aneurysm models. RES demonstrated to affect aortic integrity and aortic dilatation. The beneficial processes relevant for MFS included the improvement of endothelial dysfunction, extracellular matrix degradation, and smooth muscle cell death. For the wide range of beneficial effects on these mechanisms, evidence was found for the following involved pathways; alleviating oxidative stress (change in eNOS/iNOS balance and decrease in NOX4), reducing protease activity to preserve the extracellular matrix (decrease in MMP2), and improving smooth muscle cell survival affecting aortic aging (changing the miR21/miR29 balance). Besides aortic features, MFS patients may also suffer from manifestations concerning the heart, such as mitral valve prolapse and left ventricular impairment, where evidence from rodent models shows that RES may aid in promoting cardiomyocyte survival directly (SIRT1 activation) or by reducing oxidative stress (increasing superoxide dismutase) and increasing autophagy (AMPK activation). This overview discusses recent RES studies in animal models of aortic aneurysm formation and heart failure, where different advantageous effects have been reported that may collectively improve the aortic and cardiac pathology in patients with MFS. Therefore, a clinical study with RES in MFS patients seems justified, to validate RES effectiveness, and to judge its suitability as potential new treatment strategy.

Aortic treatment in connective tissue disease.

Connective tissue disease (CTD) represents a group of genetic conditions characterized by disruptive matrix remodeling. When this process involves aortic and vascular wall, patients with CTD have a high risk of developing arterial aneurysms, dissections and ruptures. Open surgical repair is still the gold standard therapy for patients with CTD with reasonable morbidity and mortality risk. The surgical treatment of CTD often requires multiple operations. In the endovascular era, fenestrated and branched stent grafts may play a role in reducing the complications of multiple open operations. Although the long-term results of endovascular treatment in the setting of CTD are unknown, it is generally accepted that endovascular treatment is restricted to selected patients with high surgical risk. In an emergency setting, endovascular intervention can serve as a lifesaving bridge to elective open aortic repair. Aortic centers performing a large volume of complex open and endovascular aortic repairs have started to combine these two techniques in a staged fashion. The goal is to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with extensive aortic repairs in CTD patients. For this reason, recommend endovascular therapy when a "graft-to-graft" approach is possible. In this scenario, the surgeon who performs the open repair must take into consideration future interventions. Surgical repair in any aortic segment should allow creation of proximal and distal landing zones over 4 cm to secure the sealing of a future stent graft. Connective tissue disease should be treated with a multidisciplinary approach, in high volume centers. Endovascular treatment represents a potential option in patients at high risk for open repair. Staged hybrid procedures have emerged as a way to reduce spinal cord ischemia and avoid multiple open surgeries. The aim of this article is to discuss the management of aortic diseases in CTD, focusing on to the role of standard open surgery and emerging endovascular treatment, and to give an overview of the few series published regarding this topic with a small number of patients.

Losartan Versus Atenolol for Prevention of Aortic Dilation in Patients With Marfan Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers are the standard treatment in Marfan syndrome (MFS). Recent clinical trials with limited follow-up yielded conflicting results on losartan's effectiveness in MFS. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the benefit of losartan compared with atenolol for the prevention of aortic dilation and complications in Marfan patients over a longer observation period (>5 years). METHODS: A total of 128 patients included in the previous LOAT (LOsartan vs ATenolol) clinical trial (64 in the atenolol and 64 in the losartan group) were followed up for an open-label extension of the study, with the initial treatment maintained. RESULTS: Mean clinical follow-up was 6.7 ± 1.5 years. A total of 9 events (14.1%) occurred in the losartan group and 12 (18.8%) in the atenolol group. Survival analysis showed no differences in the combined endpoint of need for aortic surgery, aortic dissection, or death (p = 0.462). Aortic root diameter increased with no differences between groups: 0.4 mm/year (95% confidence interval: 0.2 to 0.5) in the losartan and 0.4 mm/year (95% confidence interval: 0.3 to 0.6) in the atenolol group. In the subgroup analyses, no significant differences were observed considering age, baseline aortic root diameter, or type of dominant negative versus haploinsufficient FBN1 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcome of Marfan syndrome patients randomly assigned to losartan or atenolol showed no differences in aortic dilation rate or presence of clinical events between treatment groups. Therefore, losartan might be a useful, low-risk alternative to beta-blockers in the long-term management of these patients.

Predictors of Rapid Aortic Root Dilation and Referral for Aortic Surgery in Marfan Syndrome.

Few data exist regarding predictors of rapid aortic root dilation and referral for aortic surgery in Marfan syndrome (MFS). To identify independent predictors of the rate of aortic root (AoR) dilation and referral for aortic surgery, we investigated the data from the Pediatric Heart Network randomized trial of atenolol versus losartan in young patients with MFS. Data were analyzed from the echocardiograms at 0, 12, 24, and 36 months read in the core laboratory of 608 trial subjects, aged 6 months to 25 years, who met original Ghent criteria and had an AoR z-score (AoRz) > 3. Repeated measures linear and logistic regressions were used to determine multivariable predictors of AoR dilation. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to determine cut-points in AoR dilation predicting referral for aortic surgery. Multivariable analysis showed rapid AoR dilation as defined by change in AoRz/year > 90th percentile was associated with older age, higher sinotubular junction z-score, and atenolol use (R2 = 0.01) or by change in AoR diameter (AoRd)/year > 90th percentile with higher sinotubular junction z-score and non-white race (R2 = 0.02). Referral for aortic root surgery was associated with higher AoRd, higher ascending aorta z-score, and higher sinotubular junction diameter:ascending aorta diameter ratio (R2 = 0.17). Change in AoRz of 0.72 SD units/year had 42% sensitivity and 92% specificity and change in AoRd of 0.34 cm/year had 38% sensitivity and 95% specificity for predicting referral for aortic surgery. In this cohort of young patients with MFS, no new robust predictors of rapid AoR dilation or referral for aortic root surgery were identified. Further investigation may determine whether generalized proximal aortic dilation and effacement of the sinotubular junction will allow for better risk stratification. Rate of AoR dilation cut-points had high specificity, but low sensitivity for predicting referral for aortic surgery, limiting their clinical use. Clinical Trial Number ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00429364.

Influence of Aortic Stiffness on Aortic-Root Growth Rate and Outcome in Patients With the Marfan Syndrome.

The Pediatric Heart Network randomized trial of atenolol versus losartan in the Marfan syndrome showed no treatment differences in the rates of aortic-root growth or clinical outcomes. In this report we present treatment effects on aortic stiffness and determine whether baseline aortic stiffness predicts aortic-root growth and clinical outcomes. Echocardiograms at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months from 608 subjects (6 months to 25 years) who met original Ghent criteria and had a maximum aortic-root z-score (ARz) >3 were centrally reviewed. Stiffness index (SI) and elastic modulus (EM) were calculated for aortic root and ascending aorta. Data were analyzed using multivariable mixed effects modeling and Cox regression. Heart rate-corrected aortic-root SI over 3 years decreased with atenolol but did not change with losartan (-0.298 ± 0.139 vs 0.141 ± 0.139/year, p = 0.01). In the entire cohort, above-median aortic-root SI (>9.1) and EM (>618 mm Hg) predicted a smaller annual decrease in ARz (p ≤0.001). Upper-quartile aortic-root EM (>914 mm Hg) predicted the composite outcome of aortic-root surgery, dissection, or death (hazard ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 4.63, p = 0.04). Crude 3-year event rates were 10.4% versus 3.2% for higher versus lower EM groups. In conclusion, atenolol was associated with a decrease in aortic-root SI, whereas losartan was not. Higher baseline aortic-root SI and EM were associated with a smaller decrease in ARz and increased risk for clinical outcomes. These data suggest that noninvasive aortic stiffness measures may identify patients at higher risk of progressive aortic enlargement and adverse clinical outcomes, potentially allowing for closer monitoring and more aggressive therapy.

Warfarin-related nephropathy with acute kidney injury in a patient with immunoglobulin A nephropathy.

A 55-year-old man with Marfan syndrome taking warfarin for anticoagulant therapy after aortic valve replacement developed acute kidney injury (serum creatinine level of 9.01 mg/dL) and gross macrohematuria. Renal biopsy showed red cell casts in the renal tubules, glomerular crescent formation in the glomeruli with immunoglobulin A deposition, and global sclerosis. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with warfarin-related nephropathy with acute kidney injury characterized by immunoglobulin A nephropathy with crescents. The warfarin was withdrawn, and his hematuria and renal function improved without immunosuppressive agents.