The outcomes of corneal sight rehabilitating surgery in Stevens-Johnson syndrome: case series.

PURPOSE: To summarize the outcomes of corneal sight rehabilitating surgery in Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive case series. Twenty-four eyes of 18 SJS patients were included in this study. The ocular parameters, surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and additional treatments of the cases were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 29 corneal sight rehabilitating surgeries, which consists of 9 keratoplasties, 8 Keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) and 12 combined surgeries (keratoplasty and KLAL simultaneously) were performed on the 24 eyes. All patients were treated with glucocorticoid eyedrops and tacrolimus eyedrops for anti-rejection treatment without combining systemic immunosuppression, except two patients who were prescribed prednisone tablets for the management of systemic conditions. The mean follow-up period was 50.6 ± 28.1 months. The optimal visual acuity (VA) (0.74 ± 0.60 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) and endpoint VA (1.06 ± 0.82 logMAR) were both significantly better than the preoperative VA (1.96 ± 0.43 logMAR) (95% CI, p = 0.000). 57.1% patients (8/14) were no longer in the low vision spectrum, and 88.9% patients (8/9) were no longer blind. The mean epithelialization time was 7.1 ± 7.6 weeks. The success rate was 86.7%. Additional treatments for improving epithelialization included administration of serum eyedrops (n = 10), contact lens (n = 15), amniotic membrane transplantation (n = 6), and tarsorrhaphy (n = 8). Complications included delayed epithelialization (n = 4, over 12 weeks), glaucoma (n = 11), and severe allograft opacity (n = 4). Only one graft rejection was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Keratoplasty and KLAL can remarkably enhance VA and improve low vision or even eliminate blindness for ocular complications of SJS. The outcome of the surgeries was correlated with the preoperative ocular situation and choice of operative methods.

[Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related skin adverse reactions (2024 edition)].

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as crucial therapeutic agents for various malignancies by activating the host immune system against tumor cells. However, many different types of skin adverse reactions may occur during its use, including eruption, pruritus, blistering, hypopigmentation, alopecia, and even severe cases, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). These cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) had a high incidence, which seriously affected patients' quality of life and antitumor treatment decisions. Some severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) even endanger patients' lives. Therefore, the Chinese Society of Dermatology, the Chinese Dermatologist Association of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Dermatology Division of the Chinese Geriatrics Society, and other relevant experts jointly discussed and formulated the 'Chinese Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Cutaneous Adverse Reactions'. This consensus covers the name, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, classification and grading of cirAEs, principles of management and the re-initiation of ICIs. It aims to provide a more scientific and authoritative reference for the diagnosis and treatment of cirAEs in China in the future.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), which include Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption, are life-threatening conditions. The pathogenesis of SCARs involves T cell receptors recognizing drug antigens presented by human leukocyte antigens, triggering the activation of distinct T cell subsets. These cells interact with keratinocytes and various immune cells, orchestrating cutaneous lesions and systemic manifestations. Genetic predisposition, impaired drug metabolism, viral reactivation or infections, and heterologous immunity influence SCAR development and clinical presentation. Specific genetic associations with distinct SCAR phenotypes have been identified, leading to the implementation of genetic screening before prescription in various countries to prevent SCARs. Whilst systemic corticosteroids and conventional immunomodulators have been the primary therapeutic agents, evolving strategies, including biologics and small molecules targeting tumour necrosis factor, different cytokines, or Janus kinase signalling pathways, signify a shift towards a precision management paradigm that considers individual clinical presentations.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with the immune checkpoint inhibitors: A case/non-case analysis using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). These reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) are uncommon but potentially lethal. Despite the severity of these reactions and growing association with the ICIs, their specific risk and mortality rates have been largely unexplored. METHODS: A case/non-case analysis was performed using data from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to examine the reporting odds ratios (RORs) for ICI-associated SCARs cases under two conditions: (1) ICIs compared with all drugs in FAERS and (2) ICIs compared with a reference group of pooled anticancer drugs to control for underlying malignancy. RESULTS: A statistically significant ROR for SJS (ROR: 5.44), TEN (ROR: 5.81) and DRESS (ROR: 1.38) were identified under Condition 1. Under Condition 2, this significance was maintained for SJS (ROR: 7.31), TEN (ROR: 7.40) and DRESS (ROR: 3.90), and mild significance was identified for AGEP (ROR: 1.89). Mortality rates for the ICIs were increased compared with the anticancer medications (28.5% vs. 24.5% for SJS, 55.3% vs. 46% for TEN, 3.0% vs. 2.1% for AGEP and 7.1% vs. 6.1% for DRESS). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest an association between SCARs and the ICIs independent of cancer status.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) [hereafter, SJS/TEN] are uncommon but severe mucocutaneous reactions. Although they have been described in many populations worldwide, data from Hong Kong are limited. Here, we explored the epidemiology, disease characteristics, aetiology, morbidity, and mortality of SJS/TEN in Hong Kong. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all hospitalised patients who had been diagnosed with SJS/TEN in Prince of Wales Hospital from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2020. RESULTS: There were 125 cases of SJS/TEN during the 17-year study period. The annual incidence was 5.07 cases per million. The mean age at onset was 51.4 years. The mean maximal body surface area of epidermal detachment was 23%. Overall, patients in 32% of cases required burns unit or intensive care unit admission. Half of the cases involved concomitant sepsis, and 23.2% of cases resulted in multiorgan failure or disseminated intravascular coagulation. The mean length of stay was 23.9 days. The cause of SJS/TEN was attributed to a drug in 91.9% of cases, including 84.2% that involved anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antibiotics, or analgesics. In most cases, patients received treatment comprising either best supportive care alone (35.2%) or combined with intravenous immunoglobulin (43.2%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 21.6%. Major causes of death were multiorgan failure and/or fulminant sepsis (81.5%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that SJS/TEN are uncommon in Hong Kong but can cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Early recognition, prompt withdrawal of offending agents, and multidisciplinary supportive management are essential for improving clinical outcomes.

Cutaneous Hypersensitivity Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the management of various malignancies. Alongside their therapeutic success, the widespread application of ICIs has unveiled a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), most often affecting the skin. Cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs) encompass a range from common morbilliform and lichenoid rashes to more severe conditions such as bullous dermatoses and psoriasiform eruptions, each presenting distinct clinical challenges. Moreover, less common but clinically severe cutaneous reactions like toxic epidermal necrolysis have also been observed. cirAEs are frequently observed, with an incidence ranging from 37% to 70% for anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 antibodies and 17% to 40% for anti- programmed death-1/anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibodies. Recognizing the critical need for effective therapeutic strategies, this review carefully examines current approaches and guidelines for managing cirAEs.

Medication Associations With Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: A Case/Non-Case Analysis Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) are potentially life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Although the classical causal agents of SCARs (antibiotics, anticonvulsants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and allopurinol) are well characterized, there has been little update to this list to account for newly marketed medications. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated and stratified list of medications with significant reporting odds ratios (RORs) of SCARs. METHODS: A case/non-case analysis using the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System was performed. RESULTS: As expected, the prototypical medication classes made up the majority of reported cases of SJS, TEN, AGEP, and DRESS (77%, 64%, 75%, and 72%, respectively). In addition, several infrequently or previously undescribed classes/medications implicated in SCARs were identified to have significant ROR signals, including acetylcysteine, anticoagulants, diuretics, immunotherapies, proton pump inhibitors, antivirals, and antifungals. Among these reported for SJS were acetylcysteine (ROR: 64.38) and fluconazole (ROR: 17.13). For TEN, we identified furosemide (ROR: 26.32), spironolactone (ROR: 14.45), fluconazole (ROR: 30.21), amphotericin B (39.06), and acetylcysteine (ROR: 93.12). For AGEP, we identified acyclovir (ROR: 61.72), valacyclovir (ROR: 30.76), and enoxaparin (ROR: 27.37). For DRESS, we identified vemurafenib (ROR: 17.35), acyclovir (ROR: 30.63), abacavir (ROR: 26.62), raltegravir (ROR: 23.27), and valacyclovir (ROR: 21.77) to have strong reporting odds. CONCLUSION: Our analysis provides an updated tool for physicians to reference when identifying suspected SCARs and a basis for future studies to investigate atypical medication causality.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor for successful treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe infection: a case series.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare severe cutaneous adverse reaction that involves more than 30% of the body surface area. TEN can be accompanied by a series of systemic symptoms and has a high risk of death. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors such as adalimumab and etanercept have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of TEN in some cases. However, clinical data on the use of TNF-α inhibitors to treat TEN with severe systemic infection are scarce. In the present study, three adult patients who developed TEN with serious active infection were successfully treated with etanercept. One of the three patients had active open pulmonary tuberculosis, and the other two had septicemia and/or fungal sepsis. All patients' skin lesions significantly improved after several days, and none of the patients developed emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases, adverse reactions, or a similar rash during follow-up. TNF-α inhibitors may be an effective treatment choice for TEN with severe systemic infection. However, further studies with large samples are still required for validation because clinical experience is limited.

Association between methotrexate-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis and furosemide: a real-world disproportionality analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and life-threatening skin adverse reactions that are usually induced by drugs. This study aimed to assess the association between methotrexate and SJS/TEN when combined with furosemide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data on suspicious, interactions (PS, SS, I) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database for 2016-2021 were analyzed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), information component (IC), proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and the Medications and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We identified 28 case reports of TEN associated with the combination of furosemide and methotrexate and 10 reports of SJS associated with furosemide and methotrexate. The association of methotrexate with SJS/TEN was more significant in the entire data set when combined with furosemide than when methotrexate was not combined with furosemide. The association of methotrexate with SJS/TEN remained significant when furosemide was combined with methotrexate in a tumor-based disease context. After sensitivity analysis of the entire dataset as well as all antineoplastic drug datasets, consistent results were observed for TEN. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed a significant association between methotrexate and SJS/TEN when combined with furosemide, with an increased risk of SJS/TEN.

Severe reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption mimicking drug-induced epidermal necrolysis triggered by norovirus.

Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME) is an eruptive mucositis with varying degrees of cutaneous involvement presumed to be due to an immunologic response to various infectious pathogens. Most reported cases occur after a prodromal upper respiratory illness. We present a patient with a particularly severe case mimicking drug-induced epidermal necrolysis found to be triggered by asymptomatic norovirus infection, a virus not previously reported in association with RIME.

Penicillamine-induced Stevens Johnson Syndrome-toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS-TEN) Overlap in an HIV-infected Patient with Wilson's Disease and Hepatitis B.

INTRODUCTION: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe adverse drug reactions characterized by widespread blistering and mucositis. Wilson's disease is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder that results in excessive copper accumulation in the body, where penicillamine is an effective treatment option for copper chelation. Penicillamineinduced SJS-TEN is a rare but potentially fatal adverse effect. There is increased susceptibility to SJS/TEN in HIV infection due to immunosuppression and chronic liver disease due to impaired hepatic function. OBJECTIVE: To diagnose and manage the occurrence of the rare severe adverse cutaneous drug reactions in the backdrop of immunosuppression and chronic liver disease. CASE REPORT: We are reporting penicillamine-induced SJS-TEN overlap in a 30-year-old male with Wilson's disease, HIV and Hepatitis B who was treated with intravenous immunoglobulins. The patient later developed neurotrophic ulcer in the right cornea as a delayed sequela. CONCLUSION: Our case report emphasizes that there is an increased predisposition to SJS/TEN in immunocompromised and chronic liver disease patients. Physicians should be well aware of the potential danger of SJS/TEN in this subset of patients, even while prescribing a relatively safer drug.

A retrospective analysis of mortality risk and immunosuppressive therapy for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome using the TriNetX research network.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) exist on a spectrum of autoimmune conditions which cause epidermal detachment and keratinocyte necrosis. Due to the rare incidence of these conditions, a dramatic heterogeneity in treatment algorithms exists. To better appreciate pharmacologic immunosuppressive therapies' impact on survival, the authors queried a multi-institutional data network. Data for this study was extracted from TriNetX Research Network, a platform that contains ICD-9/ICD-10 coding data from a consortium of international healthcare organizations. Seventy-one institutions were queried to identify adult patients diagnosed with SJS, TEN or SJS-TEN Overlap. Cohorts were created based on the therapy received: systemic steroids (SS), diphenhydramine (DH), cyclosporine (CS), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFαi), or a combination of treatments. Cohorts were then propensity matched with patients who received supportive care. Patients who only received one of the above treatments showed no significant reduction in 90-day mortality. Patients who received CS or IVIG as part of their multitherapy showed a significantly increased risk of death when compared to supportive care (CS: RR = 1.583, 95% CI [1.119, 2.240]; IVIG: RR = 2.132, 95% CI [1.485, 3.059]). Despite their frequent utilization, this study's analysis suggests that none of these therapies confer significant 90-day mortality survival over supportive care alone. These results highlight the heterogeneity of therapies and emphasize the need for critical prospective appraisal of their outcomes in SJS and TEN.

Characteristics of mild and severe apalutamide-related cutaneous adverse events in patients with prostate cancer: A review of the literature.

Apalutamide is an antiandrogen used to treat prostate cancer. Although it sometimes induces mild cutaneous adverse events and occasionally severe ones, clinical differences between severe and mild cases remain unclear. To assess the risks in patients experiencing apalutamide-related cutaneous adverse events (ARCAEs), we aimed to characterize severe and mild ARCAEs in terms of onset time and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) for apalutamide. We reviewed 41 ARCAE cases: 24 from our institute and 17 from the literature, comprising (i) eight severe cases including six with toxic epidermal necrolysis, one with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and one with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and (ii) 33 mild cases. Patients with evere cases developed ARCAEs significantly earlier than patients with mild cases (5.2 vs 9.6 weeks). No severe cases appeared ≥8 weeks after initiation of apalutamide. LTTs showed positive results in two of seven mild cases (28.6%) and four of four severe cases (100.0%). In conclusion, we found that severe ARCAEs are characterized by earlier onset and LTT positivity. Dermatologists and urologists should pay special attention to patients who develop ARCAEs <8 weeks after initiating apalutamide and/or show positive LTT results.

Literature analysis of cutaneous adverse reactions induced by tislelizumab.

OBJECTIVE: Tislelizumab may induce immune-related adverse events, especially adverse skin events. Early detection and timely intervention of cutaneous adverse events are crucial to improve patients' quality of life and reduce the disruption of therapeutic regimens. This study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics of cutaneous adverse reactions to tislelizumab and offer a reference for its rational clinical use. METHODS: Case reports of cutaneous adverse reactions induced by tislelizumab were collected from the relevant databases (up to 31 March 2023). Patient age, sex, primary disease, medication use, occurrence of adverse skin conditions, treatment, and outcomes were recorded and descriptively analysed. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were enrolled, including six males and seven females, aged 55-79 years, with a median age of 75 years and a mean age of 70.92 ± 8.84 years. The original disease was lung carcinoma in none patients, cervical carcinoma in two, and urothelial carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in one each. The time from the initiation of medication use to the occurrence of cutaneous adverse reactions ranged from 7 to 177 days. Among the 13 patients, 10 showed improvement after drug withdrawal or symptomatic treatment. Two patients died (one died of disease progression and multiorgan failure, one died of acute coronary syndrome), and one patient's adverse skin reactions persisted without treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab-related cutaneous adverse reactions mostly occur after several days to months of treatment. In clinical practice, evaluation and monitoring should be strengthened. More attention should be paid to erythema and rashes, which may be signs of serious adverse skin reactions. Early detection and intervention can ensure the safe use of drugs and provide greater clinical benefits to patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced epidermal necrolysis: A narrative review evaluating demographics, clinical features, and culprit medications.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment but can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Severe cutaneous irAEs, including epidermal necrolysis, are rare but potentially life-threatening. There is limited understanding of the clinical features and management of ICI-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), so we aimed to analyze 95 cases of ICI-induced SJS/TEN (35 cases of SJS, 26 cases of TEN, two cases of SJS/TEN overlap, and 32 cases of unspecified) to increase knowledge of this condition among oncologists and dermatologists. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed for all relevant case reports published until the end of December 2022, and collected data on patient demographics, cancer type, ICI regimen, time to onset of SJS/TEN, clinical presentation, management strategies, and outcomes. PD-1 inhibitors were the most common ICIs associated with SJS/TEN (58.9%), followed by the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors (11.6%), and PD-L1 inhibitors (6.3%). Lung cancer and melanoma were the most frequent malignancies treated (35.8% and 25.4%, respectively). SJS/TEN occurred most frequently within the first 4 weeks (51.7%), and corticosteroid monotherapy was the most commonly chosen systemic treatment (56.4%). The overall mortality rate of ICI-induced SJS/TEN was 30.8%. Our findings highlight the frequency and severity of ICI-induced SJS/TEN and the urgent need for predictive molecular biomarkers aimed at preventive measures and early intervention.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.