Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Glob Health ; 9(11): e1528-e1538, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34678197

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to analyse trends in implementation of WHO-recommended population-level policies and associations with national geopolitical characteristics. METHODS: We calculated cross-sectional NCD policy implementation scores for all 194 WHO member states from the 2015, 2017, and 2020 WHO progress monitor reports, and examined changes over time as well as average implementation by geographical and geopolitical region and income level. We developed a framework of indicators of national characteristics hypothesised to influence policy implementation, including democracy, corporate permeation (an indicator of corporate influence), NCD burden, and risk factor prevalence. We used multivariate regression models to test our hypotheses. FINDINGS: On average, countries had fully implemented a third (32·8%, SD 18·2) of the 19 policies in 2020. Using aggregate policy scores, which include partially implemented policies, mean implementation had increased from 39·0% (SD 19·3) in 2015 to 45·9% (19·2) in 2017 and 47·0% (19·8) in 2020. Implementation was lowest for policies relating to alcohol, tobacco, and unhealthy foods, and had reversed for a third of all policies. Low-income and less democratic countries had the lowest policy implementation. Our model explained 64·8% of variance in implementation scores. For every unit increase in corporate permeation, implementation decreased by 5·0% (95% CI -8·0 to -1·9, p=0·0017), and for every 1% increase in NCD mortality burden, implementation increased by 0·9% (0·2 to 1·6, p=0·014). Democracy was positively associated with policy implementation, but only in countries with low corporate permeation. INTERPRETATION: Implementation of NCD policies is uneven, but broadly improving over time. Urgent action is needed to boost implementation of policies targeting corporate vectors of NCDs, and to support countries facing high corporate permeation. FUNDING: The National Institutes for Health Research, the Swedish Research Council, the Fulbright Commission, and the Swedish Society of Medicine.


Assuntos
Saúde Global/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Global/normas , Guias como Assunto , Política de Saúde , Doenças não Transmissíveis/classificação , Doenças não Transmissíveis/terapia , Política , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Formulação de Políticas , Organização Mundial da Saúde
2.
PLoS Med ; 18(8): e1003749, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34415914

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Indicators to evaluate progress towards timely access to safe surgical, anaesthesia, and obstetric (SAO) care were proposed in 2015 by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. These aimed to capture access to surgery, surgical workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality rate, and catastrophic and impoverishing financial consequences of surgery. Despite being rapidly taken up by practitioners, data points from which to derive the indicators were not defined, limiting comparability across time or settings. We convened global experts to evaluate and explicitly define-for the first time-the indicators to improve comparability and support achievement of 2030 goals to improve access to safe affordable surgical and anaesthesia care globally. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Utstein process for developing and reporting guidelines through a consensus building process was followed. In-person discussions at a 2-day meeting were followed by an iterative process conducted by email and virtual group meetings until consensus was reached. The meeting was held between June 16 to 18, 2019; discussions continued until August 2020. Participants consisted of experts in surgery, anaesthesia, and obstetric care, data science, and health indicators from high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Considering each of the 6 indicators in turn, we refined overarching descriptions and agreed upon data points needed for construction of each indicator at current time (basic data points), and as each evolves over 2 to 5 (intermediate) and >5 year (full) time frames. We removed one of the original 6 indicators (one of 2 financial risk protection indicators was eliminated) and refined descriptions and defined data points required to construct the 5 remaining indicators: geospatial access, workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality, and catastrophic expenditure. A strength of the process was the number of people from global institutes and multilateral agencies involved in the collection and reporting of global health metrics; a limitation was the limited number of participants from low- or middle-income countries-who only made up 21% of the total attendees. CONCLUSIONS: To track global progress towards timely access to quality SAO care, these indicators-at the basic level-should be implemented universally as soon as possible. Intermediate and full indicator sets should be achieved by all countries over time. Meanwhile, these evolutions can assist in the short term in developing national surgical plans and collecting more detailed data for research studies.


Assuntos
Anestesia/normas , Saúde Global/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Obstétricos/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Consenso
3.
Lancet Glob Health ; 9(10): e1460-e1464, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34237266

RESUMO

The eye care sector is well positioned to contribute to the advancement of universal health coverage within countries. Given the large unmet need for care associated with cataract and refractive error, coupled with the fact that highly cost-effective interventions exist, we propose that effective cataract surgery coverage (eCSC) and effective refractive error coverage (eREC) serve as ideal indicators to track progress in the uptake and quality of eye care services at the global level, and to monitor progress towards universal health coverage in general. Global targets for 2030 for these two indicators were endorsed by WHO Member States at the 74th World Health Assembly in May, 2021. To develop consensus on the data requirements and methods of calculating eCSC and eREC, WHO convened a series of expert consultations to make recommendations for standardising the definitions and measurement approaches for eCSC and eREC and to identify areas in which future work is required.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/estatística & dados numéricos , Extração de Catarata/normas , Saúde Global/normas , Guias como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Refrativos/normas , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/normas , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Refrativos/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Rev. medica electron ; 43(2): 3074-3090, mar.-abr. 2021. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1251927

RESUMO

RESUMEN Introducción: la cirrosis hepática de etiología viral representa un impactante problema de salud a nivel mundial, no solo por su elevada tasa de prevalencia, sino por los costos generados en la atención médica. Objetivos: determinar el comportamiento de los pacientes cirróticos, de etiología viral, en la provincia de Matanzas. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo-retrospectivo en 47 pacientes con cirrosis hepática de etiología viral, atendidos en el Servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Universitario Clínico Quirúrgico Comandante Faustino Pérez Hernández, de Matanzas, de enero de 2016 a enero de 2018. Los resultados de las variables analizadas se expusieron en tablas de doble entrada. Resultados: el 68,1 % de los pacientes correspondió a cirrosis por virus C. Predominaron los mayores de 50 años, con carga viral entre 4-6,9 log10, y atendidos en régimen ambulatorio. En el 57,4 % se detectaron signos endoscópicos de hipertensión portal, que se corroboraron en el doppler hepático. La ascitis asociada a diferentes sepsis fueron las complicaciones más registradas. El 55,4 % fue clasificado como Child-Pugh A, y el 76,6 % en etapa clínica compensada. Conclusiones: el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la cirrosis hepática viral sigue siendo un verdadero reto para la comunidad médica. De ahí los esfuerzos que han de realizarse para su control desde las fases compensadas, para retardar la aparición de complicaciones (AU).


ABSTRACT Introduction: viral etiology liver cirrhosis is an impacting health problem around the world, not only because of its high prevalence rate but also because of the costs generated by its medical care. Objective: to determine the behavior of the patients with viral etiology liver cirrhosis in the province of Matanzas. Materials and methods: a descriptive-retrospective study was carried out in 47 patients with viral etiology liver cirrhosis treated in the service of Gastroenterology of the Hospital "Comandante Faustino Perez" of Matanzas, from January 2016 to January 2018. The results of the analyzed variables were shown in double-entry tables. Results: 68.1% of the patients presented cirrhosis caused by C virus, Patients elder 50 years old predominated, with 4-6.9 log10, treated in ambulatory regimen. Endoscopic signs of portal hypertension were found in 57.4%. It was corroborated with liver Doppler. Ascites associated to different sepsis were the most frequently registered complications. 55.4% were classified as Child-Pugh A, and 76.6% were in compensated clinical stage. Conclusions: viral liver cirrhosis diagnosis and follow-up is still a true challenge for the medical community, and hence the efforts that should be made to control it from the compensated stages to delay the appearance of complications (AU).


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Viroses/etiologia , Cirrose Hepática/etiologia , Saúde Global/normas , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Hepatopatias/complicações , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico
6.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(5): 625-637, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33779246

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) report for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) focuses on reducing existing symptoms, decreasing the risk of future exacerbations, and improving health status by recommending specific drug therapy based on exacerbation risk and symptoms. However, disparities exist between evidence-based recommendations and clinical practice. Research that quantifies the real-world effect of COPD regimen alignment with the GOLD recommendations on clinical and economic outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare COPD-related health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs, as well as exacerbation rates, among patients with COPD on maintenance therapy based on 2017 GOLD treatment recommendation compliance status per GOLD ABCD risk group classification in a U.S. commercially insured/Medicare Advantage population. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized administrative claims data in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database. The COPD population was identified using a previously validated claims-based predictive model. Among this population, patients with ≥ 1 claim for a COPD maintenance medication (earliest maintenance fill-date = index date) between January 1, 2014, and March 31, 2017, were identified. Patients were required to be aged ≥ 40 years, have ≥ 12 months of pre-index and ≥ 30 days of post-index health plan enrollment, with no diagnosis for asthma, cystic fibrosis, and/or lung cancer at any time from January 1, 2013, to March 31, 2018. Patients were categorized into exacerbation risk/symptomatology groups according to the 2017 GOLD ABCD assessment recommendations and were then classified into treatment-compliance status based on their maintenance therapy. Multivariable analyses were conducted to examine post-index COPD-related HRU, costs, and exacerbations by compliance status. RESULTS: The primary analytical study sample included 38,382 patients in the GOLD A/B group and 6,525 in the GOLD C/D group. Patients were further categorized into GOLD A (n = 19,345), B (n = 19,037), C (n = 1,865), and D (n = 4,670). GOLD-compliant regimens were observed in 32.9% of patients in the GOLD A/B group and in 58.9% of patients in the GOLD C/D group. Inhaled corticosteroid-containing regimens were the most commonly observed noncompliant regimen. Patients on compliant regimens had significantly fewer COPD-related inpatient and emergency department visits and therefore had significantly lower COPD-related medical costs in both the GOLD A/B and C/D cohorts. Similar results were observed for individual GOLD cohorts B, C, and D. These savings were offset by increased pharmacy expenditures. Being on GOLD guideline-compliant regimens significantly reduced the risk of exacerbation by 8% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92; P < 0.0001) in the GOLD A/B cohort and by 12% (HR = 0.88; P = 0.0005) in the GOLD C/D cohort, and was also associated with a significantly reduced exacerbation rate in the GOLD A/B (rate ratio [RR] = 0.93; P < 0.0001) and GOLD C/D (RR = 0.93; P = 0.0129) groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a continuing trend of high prevalence of suboptimal prescriber compliance to GOLD treatment recommendations. Treatment regimens compliant with GOLD recommendations were associated with improvement in exacerbations, reduced COPD-related HRU, and COPD-related medical cost offsets. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI). BIPI was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as well as intellectual property considerations. Palli and Shaikh are employees of BIPI. Willey is an employee of HealthCore, which was contracted by BIPI to conduct this study. Zhou was an employee of HealthCore at the time of study execution. Data were presented in part during an AMCP webinar (recording not made public) held in lieu of the Spring 2020 AMCP conference, which was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
Progressão da Doença , Saúde Global/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Cooperação do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Corticosteroides/economia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Saúde Global/economia , Saúde Global/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/economia , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/economia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Ann Glob Health ; 87(1): 17, 2021 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33633928

RESUMO

Member States at this year's World Health Assembly 73 (WHA73), held virtually for the first time due to the COVID-19 pandemic, passed multiple resolutions that must be considered when framing efforts to strengthen surgical systems. Surgery has been a relatively neglected field in the global health landscape due to its nature as a cross-cutting treatment rather than focusing on a specific disease or demographic. However, in recent years, access to essential and emergency surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia care has gained increasing recognition as a vital aspect of global health. The WHA73 Resolutions concern specific conditions, as has been characteristic of global health practice, yet proper care for each highlighted disease is inextricably linked to surgical care. Global surgery advocates must recognize how surgical system strengthening aligns with these strategic priorities in order to ensure that surgical care continues to be integrated into efforts to decrease global health disparities.


Assuntos
Anestesia/normas , COVID-19 , Cirurgia Geral , Saúde Global , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Obstetrícia/normas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Saúde Global/normas , Saúde Global/tendências , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Phys Act Health ; 18(1): 76-85, 2021 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33276323

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released global guidelines on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior, for the first time providing population-based recommendations for people living with selected chronic conditions. This article briefly presents the guidelines, related processes and evidence, and, importantly, considers how they may be used to support research, practice, and policy. METHODS: A brief overview of the scope, agreed methods, selected chronic conditions (adults living with cancer, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and human immunodeficiency virus), and appraisal of systematic review evidence on PA/sedentary behavior is provided. Methods were consistent with World Health Organization protocols for developing guidelines. RESULTS: Moderate to high certainty evidence (varying by chronic condition and outcome examined) supported that PA can reduce the risk of disease progression or premature mortality and improve physical function and quality of life in adults living with chronic conditions. Direct evidence on sedentary behavior was lacking; however, evidence extrapolated from adult populations was considered applicable, safe, and likely beneficial (low certainty due to indirectness). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and public health professionals and policy makers should promote the World Health Organization 2020 global guidelines and develop and implement services and programs to increase PA and limit sedentary behavior in adults living with chronic conditions.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica , Exercício Físico , Saúde Global/normas , Guias como Assunto , Promoção da Saúde/normas , Saúde Pública , Comportamento Sedentário , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Atividade Motora , Qualidade de Vida , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Organização Mundial da Saúde
10.
Neurosurg Focus ; 49(6): E12, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33260127

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is feared to be a high-risk procedure for the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nonetheless, data are lacking regarding the management of EES during the pandemic. The object of this study was to understand current worldwide practices pertaining to EES for skull base/pituitary tumors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and provide a basis for the formulation of guidelines. METHODS: The authors conducted a web-based survey of skull base surgeons worldwide. Different practices by geographic region and COVID-19 prevalence were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five unique responses were collected. Regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), North America reported using more powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), and Asia and Europe reported using more standard precautions. North America and Europe resorted more to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for screening asymptomatic patients. High-prevalence countries showed a higher use of PAPRs. The medium-prevalence group reported lower RT-PCR testing for symptomatic cases, and the high-prevalence group used it significantly more in asymptomatic cases.Nineteen respondents reported transmission of COVID-19 to healthcare personnel during EES, with a higher rate of transmission among countries classified as having a medium prevalence of COVID-19. These specific respondents (medium prevalence) also reported a lower use of airborne PPE. In the cases of healthcare transmission, the patient was reportedly asymptomatic 32% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: This survey gives an overview of EES practices during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Intensified preoperative screening, even in asymptomatic patients, RT-PCR for all symptomatic cases, and an increased use of airborne PPE is associated with decreased reports of COVID-19 transmission during EES.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Saúde Global/normas , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Base do Crânio/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Humanos , Cavidade Nasal/cirurgia , Neuroendoscopia/métodos , Neuroendoscopia/normas , Neurocirurgiões/normas , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/normas
11.
Pan Afr Med J ; 36: 340, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33193993

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: globally, by 2020 the paralytic poliomyelitis disease burden decreased to over 99% of the reported cases in 1988 when resolution 41.8 was endorsed by the World Health Assembly (WHA) for global polio eradication. It is clearly understood that, if there is Wild Poliovirus (WPV) and circulating Vaccines Derived Poliovirus (cVDPV) in the world, no country is safe from polio outbreaks. All countries remain at high risk of re-importation depending on the level of the containment of the types vaccine withdrawn, the laboratory poliovirus isolates, and the population immunity induced by the vaccination program. In this regard, countries to have polio outbreak preparedness and response plans, and conducting the polio outbreak simulation exercises for these plans remain important. METHODS: we conducted a cross-section qualitative study to review to 8 countries conducted polio outbreak simulation exercises in the East and Southern Africa from 2016 to 2018. The findings were categorized into 5 outbreak response thematic areas analyzed qualitatively and summarized them on their strengths and weaknesses. RESULTS: we found out that, most countries have the overall technical capacities and expertise to deal with outbreaks to a certain extent. Nevertheless, we noted that the national polio outbreak preparedness and response plans were not comprehensive enough to provide proper guidance in responding to outbreaks. The guidelines were inadequately aligned with the WHO POSOPs, and IHR 2005. Additionally, most participants who participated in the simulation exercises were less familiar with their preparedness and response plans, the WHO POSOPs, and therefore reported to be sensitized. CONCLUSION: we also realized that, in all countries where the polio simulation exercise conducted, their national polio outbreak preparedness and response plan was revised to be improved in line with the WHO POSOPs and IHR 2005. we, therefore, recommend the polio outbreak simulation exercises to be done in every country with an interval of 3-5 years.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil/métodos , Poliomielite/epidemiologia , Poliomielite/terapia , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , África Subsaariana/epidemiologia , Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Simulação por Computador , Estudos Transversais , Erradicação de Doenças , Surtos de Doenças , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Saúde Global/normas , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/organização & administração , Implementação de Plano de Saúde/normas , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Programas de Imunização/organização & administração , Programas de Imunização/normas , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/provisão & distribuição , Vacinas contra Poliovirus/uso terapêutico , Vigilância da População , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Treinamento por Simulação/organização & administração , Treinamento por Simulação/normas , Estoque Estratégico/métodos , Estoque Estratégico/organização & administração
12.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0232320, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32353038

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Global surgery is a growing field studying the determinants of safe and affordable surgical care and advocating to gain the global health community's attention. In Cameroon, little is known about the level of knowledge and attitudes of students. Our survey aimed to describe the knowledge and attitudes of Cameroonian medical students towards global surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an anonymous online survey of final-year Cameroonian medical students. Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation analysis were used for bivariate analysis, and the alpha value was set at 0.05. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: 204 respondents with a mean age of 24.7 years (±2.0) participated in this study. 58.3% were male, 41.6% had previously heard or read about global surgery, 36.3% had taken part in a global surgery study, and 10.8% had attended a global surgery event. Mercy Ships was well known (46.5%), and most students believed that surgical interventions were more costly than medical treatments (75.0%). The mean score of the global surgery evaluation was 47.4% (±29.6%), and being able to recognize more global surgery organizations was correlated with having assumed multiple roles during global surgery studies (p = 0.008) and identifying more global surgery indicators (p = 0.04). Workforce, infrastructure, and funding were highlighted as the top priorities for the development of global surgery in Cameroon. CONCLUSION: Medical students are conscious of the importance of surgical care. They lack the opportunities to nurture their interest and should be taught global surgery concepts and skills.


Assuntos
Saúde Global/normas , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Adulto , Camarões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
World Neurosurg ; 139: e818-e826, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32380337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has consistently changed medical practice throughout specialties, regardless of their contribution in facing the disease itself. We surveyed neurosurgeons worldwide to investigate the situation they are experiencing. METHODS: A 17-question, web-based survey was administered to neurosurgeons worldwide through the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and the Neurosurgery Cocktail from March 28 to April 5, 2020, by web link or e-mail invitation. Questions were divided into 3 subgroups: general information, health system organization, and institutional plans for the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Collected data were initially elaborated using SurveyMonkey software. Country-specific data were extracted from the World Health Organization website. Statistical analysis was performed using R, version 3.6.3. RESULTS: Of the 446 respondents, most were from Italy (20%), India (19%), and Pakistan (5%). Surgical activity was significantly reduced in most centers (79%) and dedicated in-hospital routes were created for patients with SARS-CoV-2 (58%). Patient screening was performed only when there were symptoms (57%) and not routinely before surgery (18%). The preferred methods included a nasopharyngeal swab and chest radiograph. Health professionals were rarely screened (20%) and sometimes, even if SARS-CoV-2 positive, were asked to work if asymptomatic (26%). Surgical planning was changed in most institutions (92%), whereas indications were modified for nonurgent procedures (59%) and remained unchanged for subarachnoid hemorrhages (85%). CONCLUSIONS: Most neurosurgeons worldwide reported work reorganization and practices that respond to current international guidelines. Differences in practice might be related to the perception of the pandemic and significant differences in the health systems. Sharing data and experiences will be of paramount importance to address the present moment and challenges in the near future.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/cirurgia , Saúde Global/normas , Neurocirurgiões/normas , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Saúde Global/tendências , Humanos , Neurocirurgiões/tendências , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 51(2): 131-139, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138851

RESUMO

In this review article, the authors present the many challenges that orthopedic surgeons in developing countries face when implementing arthroplasty programs. The issues of cost, sterility, and patient demographics are specifically addressed. Despite the many challenges, developing countries are beginning to offer hip and knee reconstructive surgery to respond to the increasing demand for such elective operations as the prevalence of osteoarthritis continues to increase. The authors shed light on these nascent arthroplasty programs.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/normas , Países em Desenvolvimento , Osteoartrite/cirurgia , Desenvolvimento de Programas/normas , Artroplastia de Substituição/economia , Artroplastia de Substituição/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Saúde Global/economia , Saúde Global/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Missões Médicas/economia , Missões Médicas/normas , Missões Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Osteoartrite/economia , Osteoartrite/epidemiologia , Desenvolvimento de Programas/economia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Tunis Med ; 98(10): 657-663, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33479936

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compile the lessons learned in the Greater Maghreb, during the first six months of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, in the field of "capacity building" of community resilience. METHODS: An expert consultation was conducted during the first week of May 2020, using the "Delphi" technique. An email was sent requesting the formulation of a lesson, in the form of a "Public Health" good practice recommendation. The final text of the lessons was finalized by the group coordinator and validated by the signatories of the manuscript. RESULTS: A list of five lessons of resilience has been deduced and approved : 1. Elaboration of "white plans" for epidemic management; 2. Training in epidemic management; 3. Uniqueness of the health system command; 4. Mobilization of retirees and volunteers; 5. Revision of the map sanitary. CONCLUSION: Based on the evaluation of the performance of the Maghreb fight against COVID-19, characterized by low resilience, this list of lessons could constitute a roadmap for the reform of Maghreb health systems, towards more performance to manage possible waves of COVID-19 or new emerging diseases with epidemic tendency.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , África do Norte/epidemiologia , Argélia/epidemiologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Defesa Civil/métodos , Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Defesa Civil/normas , Participação da Comunidade/métodos , Conflito de Interesses , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnica Delphi , Prova Pericial , Saúde Global/normas , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Número de Leitos em Hospital/normas , Número de Leitos em Hospital/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Mauritânia/epidemiologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Pandemias , Saúde Pública/métodos , Saúde Pública/normas , SARS-CoV-2/fisiologia , Tunísia/epidemiologia
17.
Lancet Glob Health ; 8(1): e50-e58, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31813787

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most countries have endorsed WHO non-communicable disease (NCD) best buy policies, but we know very little about global implementation patterns and about the geopolitical factors affecting implementation. We aimed to assess global implementation based on analysis of multiple geopolitical datasets. METHODS: We used the 2015 and 2017 WHO NCD progress monitor reports to calculate aggregate implementation scores for 151 countries, based on their implementation of 18 WHO-recommended NCD policies. We ranked all countries and used descriptive statistics to analyse global trends. We used linear regression to assess the associations between policy implementation and World Bank geographic region, risk of premature NCD mortality, percentage of all deaths caused by NCDs, World Bank income group, human capital index, democracy index, and tax burden. FINDINGS: In 2017, the mean NCD policy implementation score was 49·3% (SD 18·4%). Costa Rica and Iran had the joint-highest implementation scores (86·1% of all WHO-recommended policies). Scores were lowest in Haiti and South Sudan (5·5%). Between 2015 and 2017, aggregate implementation scores rose in 109 countries and regressed in 32 countries. Mean implementation rose for all of the 18 policies except for those targeting alcohol and physical activity. The most commonly implemented policies were clinical guidelines, graphic warnings on tobacco packaging, and NCD risk factor surveys. Our multiple linear regression model explained 61·1% of the variance in 2017 aggregate scores (p<0·0001), but we found evidence of a high degree of collinearity between the explanatory variables. INTERPRETATION: Implementation of WHO-recommended NCD policies is increasing over time. On average, countries implemented just under half of the NCD policies recommended by WHO in 2017. Nutrition-related policies saw gains, while those related to alcohol and physical activity were the most likely to have been dropped. Aggregate implementation scores tended to be highest in high-income countries that invest in health care and education. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research, Imperial College London, University of Oxford.


Assuntos
Saúde Global/normas , Guias como Assunto , Política de Saúde , Doenças não Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Formulação de Políticas , Humanos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
18.
J Surg Res ; 247: 280-286, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery recommended 5000 operations/100,000 persons annually, but did not define condition-specific guidelines. New Zealand, Lancet Commission on Global Surgery's benchmark country, documented 1158 trauma operations/100,000 persons, providing a benchmark for trauma surgery needs. We sought to determine Ghana's annual trauma operation rate compared with this benchmark. METHODS: Data on all operations performed in Ghana from June 2014 to May 2015 were obtained from representative sample of 48/124 district (first level), 8/11 regional, and 3/5 tertiary hospitals and scaled up for nationwide estimates. Trauma operations were grouped by hospital level and categorized into "essential" (most cost-effective, highest population impact) versus "other" (specialized) as per the World Bank's Disease Control Priorities Project. Ghana's annual trauma operation rate was compared with the New Zealand benchmark to quantify current met needs for trauma surgery. RESULTS: About 232,776 operations were performed in Ghana; 35,797 were for trauma. Annual trauma operation rate was 134/100,000 (95% UI: 98-169), only 12% of the New Zealand benchmark. District hospitals performed 62% of all operations in the country, but performed only 38% of trauma operations. Eighty seven percentage of trauma operations were deemed "essential". Among specialized trauma operations, only open reduction and internal fixations had even modest numbers (3483 operations). Most other specialized trauma operations were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Ghana has a large unmet need for operative trauma care. The low percentage of trauma operations in district hospitals indicates an even greater unmet need in rural areas. Future global surgery benchmarking should consider benchmarks for trauma and other specialties, as well as for different hospital levels.


Assuntos
Benchmarking/estatística & dados numéricos , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Gana , Saúde Global/normas , Hospitais de Distrito/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
Gastroenterology ; 158(2): 404-417, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31759062

RESUMO

Screening, followed by colonoscopic polypectomy (or surgery for malignant lesions), prevents incident colorectal cancer and mortality. However, there are variations in effective application of nearly every aspect of the screening process. Screening is a multistep process, and failure in any single step could result in unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Awareness of variations in operator- and system-dependent performance has led to detailed, comprehensive recommendations in the United States and Europe on how colonoscopy screening should be performed and measured. Likewise, guidance has been provided on quality assurance for nonprimary colonoscopy-based screening programs, including strategies to maximize adherence. Quality improvement is now a validated science, and there is clear evidence that higher quality prevents incident cancer and cancer death. Quality must be addressed at the levels of the system, provider, and individuals, to maximize the benefits of screening for any population. We review the important aspects of measuring and improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Saúde Global/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Colonoscopia/normas , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Carga Global da Doença , Humanos , Incidência , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
20.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol ; 16(12): 763-771, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31388125

RESUMO

Disease burden is the most important determinant of survival in patients with cancer. This domain, reflected by the cancer stage and codified using the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, is a fundamental determinant of prognosis. Accurate and consistent tumour classification is required for the development and use of treatment guidelines and to enable clinical research (including clinical trials), cancer surveillance and control. Furthermore, knowledge of the extent and stage of disease is frequently important in the context of translational studies. Attempts to include additional prognostic factors in staging classifications, in order to facilitate a more accurate determination of prognosis, are often made with a lack of knowledge and understanding and are one of the main causes of the inconsistent use of terms and definitions. This effect has resulted in uncertainty and confusion, thus limiting the utility of the TNM classification. In this Position paper, we provide a consensus on the optimal use and terminology for cancer staging that emerged from a consultation process involving representatives of several major international organizations involved in cancer classification. The consultation involved several steps: a focused literature review; a stakeholder survey; and a consultation meeting. This aim of this Position paper is to provide a consensus that should guide the use of staging terminology and secure the classification of anatomical disease extent as a distinct aspect of cancer classification.


Assuntos
Saúde Global/normas , Oncologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/normas , Neoplasias/patologia , Terminologia como Assunto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./normas , Compreensão , Consenso , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Oncologia/métodos , Oncologia/organização & administração , Oncologia/normas , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/normas , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Prognóstico , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA