Prognosis of uterine and extrauterine low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: an observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the survival differences between uterine and extrauterine low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS). Survival outcomes, consisting of disease-free survivals and overall survivals (OS), were compared in these two entities. METHODS: From February 2012 to June 2019, all primary LGESS cases and LGESS cases with first recurrence in the study center were reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of extrauterine and uterine LGESS patients were compared for both primary and recurrent diseases. RESULTS: During the study period, 143 patients with primary LGESS and 56 patients with recurrent LGESS were included and followed up to 1 June 2020, among whom 8 (5.6%) and 10 (17.8%) patients were identified as having extrauterine LGESS. Patients with primary and recurrent extrauterine LGESS had similar clinicopathological characteristics to those of patients with uterine LGESS. In primary or in recurrent LGESS cases, in univariate analysis, patients with uterine and extrauterine LGESS had similar disease-free intervals after the last treatment, and they also had similar OSs after the diagnosis. Ovarian preservation led to significantly increased recurrence for primary LGESS [hazard ratio (HR) 4.9, 95% CI: 2.3-10.1, P <0.001) and repeated recurrence for recurrent LGESS (HR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.3-7.3, P =0.009). Surgical treatment for recurrent LGESS decreased repeated recurrence after the first recurrence (HR 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.7, P =0.006). No factors were found to be associated with the OS of primary or recurrent LGESS. CONCLUSION: The clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of extrauterine LGESS are similar to those of uterine LGESS. Surgery is the treatment of choice for recurrent LGESS. Ovarian preservation is detrimental to disease-free survival but not to OS in both uterine and extrauterine LGESS.

[Diagnosis of uterine sarcomas and rare uterine mesenchymal tumours with malignant potential. Guidelines of the French Sarcoma Group and Rare Gynaecological Tumours]. / Diagnostic des sarcomes utérins et tumeurs mésenchymateuses utérines rares à potentiel de malignité. Référentiels du Groupe Sarcome Français et des Tumeurs Rares Gynécologiques.

The landscape of uterine sarcomas is becoming more complex with the description of new entities associated with recurrent driver molecular alterations. Uterine sarcomas, in analogy with soft tissue sarcomas, are distinguished into complex genomic and simple genomic sarcomas. Leiomyosarcomas and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas belong to complex genomic sarcomas group. Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, other rare tumors associated with fusion transcripts (such as NTRK, PDGFB, ALK, RET ROS1) and SMARCA4-deficient uterine sarcoma are considered simple genomic sarcomas. The most common uterine sarcoma are first leiomyosarcoma and secondly endometrial stromal sarcomas. Three different histological subtypes of leiomyosarcoma (fusiform, myxoid, epithelioid) are identified, myxoid and epithelioid leiomyosarcoma being more aggressive than fusiform leiomyosarcoma. The distinction between low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is primarily morphological and immunohistochemical and the detection of fusion transcripts can help the diagnosis. Uterine PEComa is a rare tumor, which is distinguished into borderline and malignant, according to a risk assessment algorithm. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix is more common in children but can also occur in adult women. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix is almost always DICER1 mutated, unlike that of the vagina which is wild-type DICER1, and adenosarcoma which can be DICER1 mutated but with less frequency. Among the emerging entities, sarcomas associated with fusion transcripts involving the NTRK, ALK, PDGFB genes benefit from targeted therapy. The integration of molecular data with histology and clinical data allows better identification of uterine sarcomas in order to better treat them.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma confirmed by central pathologic review: A multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Clinical Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS and HGESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUS) are rare tumors whose pathological classification and staging system have changed recently. These tumors are reported to contain fusion genes. We aimed to clarify the genetic background, clinical features, prognostic factors, and optimal therapy of these tumors using a new classification and staging system. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical features and prognostic information of 72 patients with LGESS, 25 with HGESS, and 16 with UUS using central pathological review. Estrogen and progesterone receptors (PgRs) were examined by immunohistochemistry. JAZF1-SUZ12 and YWHAE-NUTM2A/B gene fusions were tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of LGESS, HGESS, and UUS were 94%, 53%, and 25%, respectively. In LGESS, stage IV, incomplete surgery, and absence of PgR were associated with poor OS. The presence of JAZF1-SUZ12 fusion gene was not associated with OS. In HGESS, the relationship between stage and prognosis was unclear. None of the 3 patients with YWHAE-NUTM2A/B fusion gene died during follow-up. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a favorable OS. Incomplete resection of UUS was associated with poor OS; however, residual tumors frequently occurred. Although most patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, their prognosis was extremely poor even in stage I disease. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of LGESS is generally good; however, stage IV, incomplete surgery, and PgR-negative tumors are associated with poor prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be useful for HGESS. Prognosis of UUS is extremely poor, even with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic factors, oncological treatment and outcomes of uterine sarcoma: 10 years' clinical experience from a tertiary care center in Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Uterine sarcoma is an uncommon aggressive malignancy. Optimal management and prognostic factors have yet to be well recognized due to their rarity and various histological subtypes. This study aims to investigate these patients' prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and oncological outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on all patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma and treated from January 2010 to December 2019 in a tertiary-care hospital in Pakistan. The data were analyzed using STATA software and stratified on the histological subtype. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% CI were estimated using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients, 16(40%) had uterine leiomyosarcoma (u-LMS), 10(25%) had high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS), 8(20%) had low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) and 6(15%) had other histological subtypes. The median age of all patients was 49 (40-55.5). Thirty-seven (92.5%) patients underwent primary surgical resection, and 24 (60%) patients received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. The survival plots showed the overall population's DFS of 64 months and the OS of 88 months (p-value = 0.001). The median DFS in all patients was 12 months, and the median OS was 14 months (p-value = 0.001). A small but significant DFS benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, 13.5 versus 11 months (p-value = 0.001). Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed that large tumor size and advanced FIGO stage were substantial factors associated with decreased survival. CONCLUSION: Uterine sarcomas are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. Multiple factors, including tumor size, mitotic count, stage of the disease, and myometrial invasion, impact survival outcomes. Adjuvant treatment may decrease the recurrence rate and improve DFS but do not affect OS.

Prognostic factors in patients with uterine sarcoma: the SARCUT study.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies that include different histological sub-types. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate the impact of the different prognostic factors on overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with uterine sarcoma. METHODS: This international multicenter retrospective study included 683 patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma at 46 different institutions between January 2001 and December 2007. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, and adenosarcoma was 65.3%, 78.3%, 52.4%, and 89.5%, respectively, and the 5-year disease-free survival was 54.3%, 68.1%, 40.3%, and 85.3%, respectively. The 10-year overall survival for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma and adenosarcoma was 52.6%, 64.8%, 52.4%, and 79.5%, respectively, and the 10-year disease-free survival was 44.7%, 53.3%, 40.3%, and 77.5%, respectively. The most significant factor associated with overall survival in all types of sarcoma except for adenosarcoma was the presence of residual disease after primary treatment. In adenosarcoma, disease stage at diagnosis was the most important factor (hazard ratio 17.7; 95% CI 2.86 to 109.93). CONCLUSION: Incomplete cytoreduction, tumor persistence, advanced stage, extra-uterine and tumor margin involvement, and the presence of necrosis were relevant prognostic factors significantly affecting overall survival in uterine sarcoma. The presence of lymph vascular space involvement and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse.

Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization Revealed the High Sensitivity of Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in a Subset of Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: The unique chromosomal rearrangements of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) make it possible to distinguish high-grade ESS (HGESS) and low-grade ESS (LGESS) from the molecular perspective. Analysis of ESS at the genomic and transcriptomic levels can help us achieve accurate diagnosis of ESS and provide potential therapy options for ESS patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 ESS patients who conducted DNA- and/or RNA-based next-generation sequencing were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The molecular characteristics of ESS at genomic and transcriptomic levels, including mutational spectrum, fusion profiles, gene expression and pathway enrichment analysis and features about immune microenvironment were comprehensively explored. RESULTS: TP53 and DNMT3A mutations were the most frequent mutations. The classical fusions frequently found in HGESS (ZC3H7B-BCOR and NUTM2B-YWHAE) and LGESS (JAZF1-SUZ12) were detected in our cohort. CCND1 was significantly up-regulated in HGESS, while the expression of GPER1 and PGR encoding estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) did not differ significantly between HGESS and LGESS. Actionable mutations enriched in homologous recombination repair, cell cycle, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathways were detected in 60% of HGESS patients. Genes with up-regulated expression in HGESS were significantly enriched in five immune-related pathways. Most HGESS patients (85.7%) had positive predictors of immunotherapy efficacy. Moreover, immune microenvironment analysis showed that HGESS had relatively high immune infiltration. The degree of immune infiltration in HGESS patients with ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion was relatively higher than that of those with NUTM2B-YWHAE fusion. CONCLUSION: This study investigated the molecular characteristics of ESS patients at the genomic and transcriptomic levels and revealed the potentially high sensitivity of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in a subset of HGESS with specific molecular features, providing a basis for guiding decision-making of treatment and the design of future clinical trials on precision therapy.

Endometrial stromal tumors of the uterus: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes.

Endometrial stromal tumors (EST) are uterine mesenchymal tumors, which histologically resemble endometrial stroma of the functioning endometrium. The majority of EST are malignant tumors classified as low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Overall, ESTs are rare malignancies, with an annual incidence of approximately 0.30 per 100'000 women, mainly affecting peri- or postmenopausal women. The most common genetic alteration identified in LG-ESS is the JAZF1-SUZ12 rearrangement, while t(10;17)(q23,p13) translocation and BCOR gene abnormalities characterize two major subtypes of HG-ESS. The absence of specific genetic abnormalities is the actual hallmark of UUS. Unlike HG-ESSs, LG-ESSs usually express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Total hysterectomy without morcellation and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is the first-line treatment of early-stage LG-ESS. Ovarian preservation, fertility-sparing treatment, and adjuvant hormonal therapy ± radiotherapy may be an option in selected cases. In advanced or recurrent LG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction followed by hormonal treatment, or vice versa, are acceptable treatments. The standard treatment for apparently early-stage HG-ESS and UUS is total hysterectomy without morcellation with BSO. Ovarian preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy may be an option. In advanced or recurrent HG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered. Alternative treatments, including biological agents and immunotherapy, are under investigation. LG-ESSs are indolent tumor with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 80-100% and present as stage I-II at diagnosis in two third of patients. HG-ESSs carry a poor prognosis, with a median OS ranging from 11 to 24 months, and 70% of patients are in stage III-IV at presentation. UUS median OS ranges from 12 to 23 months and, at diagnosis, 70% of patients are in stage III-IV. The aim of this review is to assess the clinical, pathological, and biological features and the therapeutic options for malignant ESTs.

Extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: A systematic review and outcome analysis.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is the second most common uterine mesenchymal neoplasm. ESS can arise from extrauterine locations without any uterine involvement and is called extrauterine ESS (EESS). The epidemiological features of EESS are not well-known. Moreover, the factors affecting its outcome have not been systemically studied. The treatment of EESS closely follows that of uterine ESS, comprised of different combinations of surgical management, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. However, the effectiveness of different treatment protocols for EESS has not been studied. Here, we have performed a systematic review of all reported cases of EESS in the English literature. We further performed a meta-analysis of the outcome data and investigated how the patients' age, tumor site, tumor size, and management affect the overall and progression-free survival of the patients. We found that tumor site and mode of treatment significantly affected the overall survival and progression-free survival of the patients. Tumor size significantly affected overall survival but not progression-free survival, while the age at diagnosis did not affect patient outcome. As far as we know, ours is the first systematic study of this rare malignancy with an emphasis on outcome analysis.

High-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Molecular Alterations and Potential Immunotherapeutic Strategies.

Endometrial stromal tumor (EST) is an uncommon and unusual mesenchymal tumor of the uterus characterized by multicolored histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. The morphology of ESTs is similar to normal endometrial stromal cells during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. ESTs were first classified into benign and malignant based on the number of mitotic cells. However, recently WHO has divided ESTs into four categories: endometrial stromal nodules (ESN), undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS). HG-ESS is the most malignant of these categories, with poor clinical outcomes compared to other types. With advances in molecular biology, ESTs have been further classified with morphological identification. ESTs, including HG-ESS, is a relatively rare type of cancer, and the therapeutics are not being developed compared to other cancers. However, considering the tumor microenvironment of usual stromal cancers, the advance of immunotherapy shows auspicious outcomes reported in many different stromal tumors and non-identified uterine cancers. These studies show the high possibility of successful immunotherapy in HG-ESS patients in the future. In this review, we are discussing the background of ESTs and the BCOR and the development of HG-ESS by mutations of BCOR or other related genes. Among the gene mutations of HG-ESSs, BCOR shows the most common mutations in different ways. In current tumor therapies, immunotherapy is one of the most effective therapeutic approaches. In order to connect immunotherapy with HG-ESS, the understanding of tumor microenvironment (TME) is required. The TME of HG-ESS shows the mixture of tumor cells, vessels, immune cells and non-malignant stromal cells. Macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells and natural killer cells lose their expected functions, but rather show pro-tumoral functions by the matricellular proteins, extracellular matrix and other complicated environment in TME. In order to overcome the current therapeutic limitations of HG-ESS, immunotherapies should be considered in addition to the current surgical strategies. Checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine-based immunotherapies, immune cell therapies are good candidates to be considered as they show promising results in other stromal cancers and uterine cancers, while less studied because of the rarity of ESTs. Based on the advance of knowledge of immune therapies in HG-ESS, the new strategies can also be applied to the current therapies and also in other ESTs.

Primary low-grade extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: analysis of 10 cases with a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the clinical and pathological features of extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (EESS) and explore an effective therapeutic regimen to reduce the recurrence rate in low-grade EESS patients. METHODS: Ten LG-EESS patients who were treated at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Institute and Hospital from June 1999 to June 2019 were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: (1) Patient demographics are summarized in manuscript. Preoperative CA125 examination showed that 8 patients had a median level of 49.5 U/L (15.4-168.0 U/L). (2) All ten patients underwent tumor cytoreductive surgery. Five patients underwent optimal tumor resection and achieved an R0 resection. After the initial surgery, 7 patients who had multiple metastasis were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 patients with vaginal ESS were treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and 6 patients with ER/PR positive received hormone therapy with or without chemotherapy. (2) Most EESS patients had multiple tumors. The omentum was the most commonly affected site, followed by the ovaries. (3) The median follow-up was 94 (range: 27-228) months, and recurrence was observed in 3 patients (n = 10, 30%) who underwent non-optimal surgery and no hormone therapy. The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were both 70%, as shown in Fig. 2. OS was both 100% at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSION: As a conclusion, EESS is a rare disease and LG-EESS has a good prognosis. Surgery remains the available treatment for patients. LG-EESS has a risk of late recurrence which requires a long-term follow-up. With a limited sample size, our study shows optimal tumor reductive surgery and adjuvant hormone therapy may significantly reduce the risk of recurrence.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment of patients with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 40 cases.

ABSTRACT: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS).The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognostic information of consecutive HG-ESS patients were collected from medical records and then evaluated.A total of 40 women were included in the analysis. The immunohistochemical profiles indicated that HG-ESS tumors tend to be locally or weakly positive for vimentin (100%) and CD10 (72.0%) but mostly negative for desmin (7.7%) and AE1/AE3 (9.1%). The progression-free survival intervals and the clinical benefit rates of patients receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were slightly longer and higher than those receiving simple observation (progression-free survival: 6 and 5 months vs 2 months; clinical benefit rate: 83.3% and 75.0% vs 28.6%). The 1-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 62.7%. Tumor size, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, cervical involvement, Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and residual disease all significantly affected the DSS rate (P < .001, =.002, <.001, =.004, <.001, and <.001, respectively). For patients with stage I disease, the 1-year DSS rate was as high as 91.7%, in contrast to 66.7%, 26.7%, and 0% for those with stage II, III, and IV disease, respectively.HG-ESS is associated with an adverse prognosis. FIGO stage could effectively predict the prognosis of patients with this lethal disease. Immunohistochemical markers, vimentin+/CD10+ (local or very weak), in combination with desmin-/AE1/AE3-, may be helpful for improving the diagnostic accuracy of this lethal condition. The therapeutic roles of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy warrant further investigation.

Gynecological sarcomas: literature review of 2020.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article, focus on recently published data of the last 18 months on the management of gynecologic sarcomas. RECENT FINDINGS: Different tools have been studied to identify the differences between benign from malignant uterine conjonctive tumor.Molecular biology impact more and more on the diagnosis of uterine sarcoma with new definitions of very specific groups. This will make it possible to better define the last group of endometrial sarcoma which has been defined as undifferentiated.In several articles, surgical approaches and fertility-sparing surgery were described including the role of surgery for recurrences.Some other articles have evaluated the potential benefice of adjuvant therapy for uterine sarcoma with early stages.Several new targeted therapies are in development. Notably deoxyribonucleic acid repair machinery in uterine leiomyosarcoma and also immune therapies, transforming growth factor beta pathway, mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor, anti angiogenics, etc. SUMMARY: This last year the potential interest for uterine sarcoma increased, demonstrated by the increasing number of publications in the literature compared to previous years. Despite this greater interest over time, the standard of care for uterine sarcoma does not change and we are always waiting for new innovative therapies able to change routine practice and survival of patients. Currently, the result of different clinical trials, which include new options as targeted molecular approach or immune checkpoint inhibitors are closed to be reported.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.

PURPOSE: To review the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of patients diagnosed with Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS) and Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma (USS) at our institution and investigate their clinical outcomes and factors affecting prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected demographic data, preoperative diagnostic methods and therapeutic management of patients treated for ESS and UUS between January 1995 and December 2019 at Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Spain. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included in the study, of which 51(81%) had a diagnosis of ESS and 12(19%) of UUS. Twenty patients (31.7%) were diagnosed after a previous non-oncologic surgery, and 12 of them (60%) suffered from tumor disruption. Cytoreductive procedures were needed in 29 patients (46%), and optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 80.9% of the patients. The median follow-up was 7.6 years (IQR = 0.99-14.31). Five-year overall survival was 57.6% (44.2-68.8) and was significantly better for low-grade ESS (LG-ESS) patients (p < 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival was 57.1% (42.8-69.1) and was also significantly higher in LG-ESS cohort (p = 0.03). After multivariate analysis histological type, age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and mitotic index were found significantly correlated with survival. For high-grade EES (HG-ESS) and USS patients adjuvant radiotherapy also correlated with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Overall survival and disease-free survival are significantly better in patients with LG-ESS cohort. HG-ESS and UUS show similar survival outcomes. Age, FIGO stage, optimal surgery and histological type were significantly correlated with survival in the global cohort, whilst adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with improved survival in HG-ESS and UUS patients.

A retrospective study of endometrial stromal sarcoma: an institutional review.

This is a retrospective study conducted at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore, from January 1995 to April 2016, to determine the clinical presentations, pathological features, cancer free survival and rate of recurrence in patients with Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS). Data was collected from May to August 2017. A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 40.0±11.72 years were treated. Among them, 12 (38.7%) had stage I, 2 (6.4%) had stage II, 6 (19.3%) had stage III and 11 (35.5%) had stage IV ESS. All patients underwent surgical management as an initial treatment modality for ESS. Out of these 31 patients, 17 were under active surveillance, 4 had expired and 10 patients were lost to follow up. Eleven (65%) patients were disease free, recurrence was noted in 4 (23.5%) patients and 2 (12%) patients had persistent disease. Recurrence of disease was managed with surgical excision and multimodality treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 38.29 months. Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare uterine tumour. Our patients were young and had lower rate of recurrence. Surgical management was the mainstay of treatment in patients with resectable disease while other options used included hormonal therapy, radio therapy or chemotherapy.

The clinical benefits of hormonal treatment for LG-ESS: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical benefits of hormonal treatment for patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) by reviewing the published literature and performing a meta-analysis. METHODS: Correlational studies related to hormonal treatment for LG-ESS patients were collected by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases up to December 2018. Eligible studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main inclusion criteria included: original studies with definite diagnoses of LG-ESS that evaluated the clinical benefits of hormonal treatment, studies with at least 10 cases, and studies published in English. Reviews, case reports, letters, comments or conference abstracts, studies without sufficient data and overlapping or republished studies were excluded. The study quality was evaluated, and pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 10 retrospective studies were included. The NOS stars of the 10 studies ranged from 7 to 9 points, which was considered to be of high quality. Recurrence and death information was provided in 9 and 6 studies, respectively. The overall pooled RR for recurrence was 0.66 (95% CI 0.47-0.94), which indicated that hormonal treatment was effective at reducing the recurrence risk (P = 0.02). The overall pooled RR for death was 0.81 (95% CI 0.59-1.12), which showed that hormonal treatment had little effect in prolonging overall survival (P = 0.20). Stratified analysis showed that compared with the group without any adjuvant treatments, hormonal treatment alone significantly decreased the risk of recurrence (P = 0.02), while hormonal treatment had no significant effects on overall survival (P = 0.38). Another subgroup analysis indicated that for stage I-II patients, hormonal treatment could significantly decrease the risk of recurrence (P = 0.02) but could not influence overall survival (P = 0.87). However, for stage III-IV patients, hormonal treatment had little benefit both in reducing the recurrence risk and prolonging overall survival (P = 0.49/0.08). Egger's and Begg's test showed that the publication bias for the literature was satisfactorily controlled. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant hormonal treatment should be considered as a feasible adjuvant therapy for reducing the recurrence risk of patients with LG-ESS while bearing little benefit on overall survival.

Hormone therapy following surgery in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: Is it related to a decrease in recurrence rate?

BACKGROUND: Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is, in most cases, a slow-growing malignancy; however, it is related with high recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to determine which factors may be associated with the recurrence rate of LGESS. METHODS: The clinicopathological features and treatment options in 37 patients with LGESS were evaluated. RESULTS: All patients underwent the hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Additionally, lymphadenectomy was performed in 56.8% (n = 21) of the patients. Among the patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, 14.3% (n = 3) had lymph node metastasis. The disease was limited to the uterus in 75.7% of patients. Treatment following surgery was radiotherapy in three patients, chemotherapy in seven patients, hormone therapy in 12 patients, and chemotherapy plus hormone therapy in one patient. Megestrol acetate was used in all patients who received hormone therapy. Median follow-up time was 96 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 72% and 97%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 27%. Only hormone therapy following surgery was significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate, even in patients with stage 1 disease. None of the patients treated with hormone therapy following surgery had recurrence, whereas recurrence occurred in 38.5% of the patients who underwent surgery only (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Hormone therapy after surgery should be considered a viable option for decreasing the LGESS recurrence rate, regardless of the disease stage.

Localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and localized undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a retrospective series of the French Sarcoma Group.

OBJECTIVE: High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas are associated with a very poor prognosis. Although large surgical resection is the standard of care, the optimal adjuvant strategy remains unclear. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (stages I-III) treated in 10 French Sarcoma Group centers was conducted. RESULTS: 39 patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas treated from 2008 to 2016 were included. 24/39 patients (61.5%) were stage I at diagnosis. 38/39 patients underwent surgical resection, with total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy completed in 26/38 (68%). Surgeries were mostly resection complete (R0, 23/38, 60%) and microscopically incomplete resection (R1, 6/38, 16%). 22 patients (58%) underwent postoperative radiotherapy (including brachytherapy in 11 cases), and 11 (29%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 33 months (range 2.6-112), 17/39 patients were alive and 21/39 (54%) had relapsed (9 local relapses and 16 metastases). The 3 year and 5 year overall survival rates were 49.8% and 31.1%, respectively, and 3 year and 5 year disease free survival rates were 42.7% and 16.0%, respectively. Median overall survival and disease free survival were 32.7 (95% CI 16.3-49.1) and 23 (4.4-41.6) months, respectively. Medians were, respectively, 46.7 months and 39.0 months among those who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and 41.0 months and 10.3 months for those who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P=0.012) and disease free survival (P=0.036). Chemotherapy, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics I-II stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status 0 correlated with improved overall survival (P=0.034, P=0.002, P=0.006), and absence of vascular invasion (P=0.014) was associated with better disease free survival. CONCLUSIONS: The standard treatment of primary localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas is total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. The current study shows that adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy appear to improve overall survival. A prospective large study is warranted to validate this therapeutic management.

Management of uterine sarcomas and prognostic indicators: real world data from a single-institution.

BACKGROUND: Uterine sarcomas consist a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal gynecological malignancies with unclear therapeutic recommendations and unspecific but poor prognosis, since they usually metastasize and tend to recur very often, even in early stages. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all female patients with uterine sarcomas treated in our institution over the last 17 years. Clinico-pathological data, treatments and outcomes were recorded. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted and time-to-event analyses were estimated using Cox regression. RESULTS: Data were retrieved from 61 women with a median age of 53 (range: 27-78) years, at diagnosis. Fifty-one patients were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 3 with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), 5 with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS), 1 with Ewing sarcoma (ES) and 1 with Rhabdomyosarcoma (RS). 24 cases had stage I, 7 stage II, 14 stage III and 16 stage IV disease. Median disease-free survival (DFS) in adjuvant approach was 18.83 months, and median overall survival (OS) 31.07 months. High mitotic count (> 15 mitoses) was significantly associated with worse OS (P < 0.001) and worse DFS (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Mitotic count appears to be independent prognostic factor while further insights are needed to improve adjuvant and palliative treatment of uterine sarcomas.