Vision Screening in Adults Across the Life Span.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine whether adults across the life span differ in responses to quick vision screening and how those responses relate to adults' use of specialized eye care. METHODS: Subjects were 363 community-dwelling ambulatory adults, 21 to 95 years old, who were tested while they wore their corrective lenses during routine visits to a tertiary care facility. No subjects had known neurological impairments, age-related macular degeneration, or other significant eye disease. A wall-mounted Early Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart was used. RESULTS: Older adults 58 years old or older had significantly worse scores than younger adults. Scores did not differ between subjects who had been tested within or prior to the last 10 months. Older subjects had their vision tested significantly more recently than younger subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Vision screening is quick, inexpensive, and easily performed by ancillary staff, and it may provide the physician with useful additional information for treatment planning.

Effect of a teleretinal screening program on eye care use and resources.

IMPORTANCE: Telemedicine is a useful clinical method to extend health care to patients with limited access. Minimal information exists on the subsequent effect of telemedicine activities on eye care resources. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a community-based diabetic teleretinal screening program on eye care use and resources. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The current study was a retrospective medical record review of patients who underwent diabetic teleretinal screening in the community-based clinics of the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center from October 1, 2008, through March 31, 2009, and who were referred for an ophthalmic examination in the eye clinic. EXPOSURES: Clinical medical records were reviewed for a 2-year period after patients were referred from teleretinal screening. The following information was collected for analysis: patient demographics, referral and confirmatory diagnoses, ophthalmology clinic visits, diagnostic procedures, surgical procedures, medications, and spectacle prescriptions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The accuracy between referring and final diagnoses and the eye care resources that were used in the care of referred patients. RESULTS: The most common referral diagnoses were nonmacular diabetic retinopathy (43.2%), nerve-related disease (30.8%), lens or media opacity (19.1%), age-related macular degeneration (12.9%), and diabetic macular edema (5.6%). The percentage of agreement among these 5 visually significant diagnoses was 90.4%, with a total sensitivity of 73.6%. Diabetic macular edema required the greatest number of ophthalmology clinic visits, diagnostic tests, and surgical procedures. Using Medicare cost data estimates, the mean cost incurred during a 2-year period per patient seen in the eye clinic was approximately $1000. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although a teleretinal screening program can be accurate and sensitive for multiple visually significant diagnoses, measurable resource burdens should be anticipated to adequately prepare for the associated increase in clinical care.

Are there inequities in the utilisation of childhood eye-care services in relation to socio-economic status? Evidence from the ALSPAC cohort.

BACKGROUND: Equity of access to eye care in childhood remains poorly researched, and most studies report data on utilisation without any objective measure of clinical need. Participants/method: 8271 participants from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a longitudinal birth cohort, were seen at age 7, when they underwent a comprehensive eye examination and details of family history of eye conditions, vision problems and contact with eye-care services were obtained. RESULTS: 2931 (35.4%) children had been in contact with an eye-care specialist, and 1452 (17.6%) had received vision screening. Compared with social class I, the prevalence of eye conditions was higher in the lower groups (social class IIIM, IV, V) (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.46). However, children from lower socio-economic status groups were less likely to see an eye-care specialist (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00) or to use screening services (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.98). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The differences in the trends between socio-economic groups in eye conditions and utilisation of services suggest inequitable access to services. These data highlight the limitations of community-based preschool vision screening, which fails to abolish this inequity. It is important that future research explores the reasons behind these patterns. Compulsory school-entry vision screening, as recommended by the National Screening Committee and the Hall Report may redress this differential uptake of services.

Visual impairment and use of eye-care services and protective eyewear among children--United States, 2002.

Visual impairment is an important cause of developmental disability among children. Ocular conditions, if undetected or untreated, can have substantial long-term implications for the quality of life of the child and the family and can place a burden on public health resources. For these reasons, the national health objectives for 2010 now include three vision objectives for children: 1) reducing visual impairment and blindness, 2) increasing the proportion of preschool children who receive vision screening, and 3) increasing the use of protective eyewear in recreational activities and hazardous situations around the home (objective nos. 28-2, 28-4, and 28-9a). When these objectives were published in November 2000, baseline data were available for only one objective, that of reducing visual impairment and blindness among children. To address all three childhood vision objectives, CDC analyzed data from the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). This report summarizes the results of that analysis, which indicated that the prevalence of visual impairment and the use of eye-care services were significantly higher among children aged >6 years, compared with younger children, and varied by race/ethnicity and family income. As a result of that analysis, national baselines are now available for all three objectives. Collaborative efforts of all relevant agencies, health professionals, educators, and the public are needed to achieve the national childhood vision objectives for 2010.

Rapid assessment of cataract surgical services in age group 50 years and above in Lower Dir District Malakand, Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rapid assessment of cataract blindness and surgical services in age group 50 years and above. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: This survey was conducted in District Lower Dir, Malakand Division, NWFP, Pakistan, from March 9-23, 2003. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A community-based survey was carried out with systematic cluster random sampling. The survey was preceded by a pilot study in which the proforma and operational methods were field-tested and refined. One thousand, one hundred and fifty eligible adults of 50 years and older were selected by systematic random sampling from the whole lower Dir district of Malakand, Pakistan. A total of 1076 subjects (93.6%) were examined. The visual acuity of each eye was assessed using tumble Snellen's E Card method at 6 and 3 meters. Any subject having visual acuity <3/60 with or without obvious lens opacity or with aphakia (removal of lens) or pseudophakia (removal of cataract lens and implantation of artificial lens) was examined in detail. The surgical services were assessed by measuring the prevalence of pseudophakia, surgical outcome of visual acuity and also the effect of place of surgery on outcome. RESULTS: Prevalence of total bilateral blindness was 2.6%, and unilateral blindness 2.46%. Total prevalence of aphakia was 2.4%, which was almost equal in both sexes, male 2.3% and female 2.4%. Prevalence of unilateral aphakia was 0.3 % in females being slightly higher than males, 0.16 %. The prevalence of bilateral aphakia was 2.2% and 2% in males and females respectively. Prevalence of total pseudophakic eyes was 2.74%. Surgical outcome showed good, borderline and poor visual acuity of 40.5%, 22% and 14.3% respectively. Surgical outcome was also seemed to be better in private hospitals as compared to field camps. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that to reduce the prevalence of blindness there was a need to improve the quality of services in mobile camps and fixed facilities. At the same time the visual outcome of surgery could be improved by expanding the number of Intraocular lens procedures and routine monitoring of cataract outcome.

Current status of screening for diabetic retinopathy in the UK.

This article reviews the current status of retinopathy screening schemes in the UK. There is evidence that high-quality diabetic retinopathy screening schemes are in existence but provision is patchy. Many health authorities have ad hoc screening programmes reaching only about 60% of patients, with unacceptable or undocumented efficacy and minimal quality control. Several models of screening are currently in use with the current preferred option being camera-based screening. Digital imaging systems offer the best prospects for image acquisition, although at present evidence of adequate effectiveness only exists for 35 mm film-based systems. The final report of the National Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme commissioned by the UK National Screening Committee for inclusion into the national service framework for diabetes, is thus eagerly awaited and should set standards for screening programmes, in order to improve the care of all those with diabetes. Quality assurance will be the main driver in the immediate future of improvements in screening programmes. Research data will provide the evidence to refine techniques and set targets in the longer term, with the emphasis on cost-effectiveness and quality of life.

The gatekeeper in vision care. An analysis of the co-ordination of professional services in The Netherlands.

Data from a national survey were used to explore the position of ophthalmologists, general practitioners, orthoptists, optometrists and opticians in the domain of vision care services. Options for organising the gatekeeper function were analysed. This was done on the basis of six cases that the five key occupations considered as their overlapping areas. Nearly all respondents reported to be consulted by patients with the given complaints, indicating rather unclear boundaries between the professions. Further, the opinions indicated preference for a medical gatekeeper (ophthalmologist, GP) rather than a non-medical one (optometrist). Lack of agreement on suggested gatekeeper options suggest other options to consider, like regional networks of GPs, ophthalmologists, orthoptists and optometrists who share the responsibility for a specified client population. At present, such innovative arrangements are being introduced. GPs and optometrists could share the responsibility for gate-keeping and for referring patients to more specialised services.

Measuring clinical performance: comparison and validity of telephone survey and administrative data.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and validate self-reported telephone survey and administrative data for two Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measures: mammography and diabetic retinal exams. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: A telephone survey was administered to approximately 700 women and 600 persons with diabetes randomly chosen from each of two health maintenance organizations (HMOs). STUDY DESIGN: Agreement of survey and administrative data was assessed by using kappa coefficients. Validity measures were assessed by comparing survey and administrative data results to a standard: when the two sources agreed, that was accepted as the standard; when they differed, confirmatory information was sought from medical records to establish the standard. When confirmatory information was not available ranges of estimates consistent with the data were constructed by first assuming that all persons for whom no information was available had received the service and alternately that they had not received the service. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The kappas for mammography were .65 at both HMOs; for retinal exam they were .38 and .40. Sensitivity for both data sources was consistently high. However, specificity was lower for survey (range .44 to .66) than administrative data (.99 to 1.00). The positive predictive value was high for mammography using either data source but differed for retinal exam (survey .69 to .78; administrative data .99 to 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Administrative and survey data performed consistently in both HMOs. Although administrative data appeared to have greater specificity than survey data the validity and utility of different data sources for performance measurement have only begun to be explored.

Use of collaborative audit to assist local implementation of the SIGN guideline for prevention of visual impairment in diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: To use audit to inform the local implementation of a national clinical guideline for the prevention of visual impairment in diabetes. DESIGN: Computer and patient record search in hospital and general practice to determine levels of morbidity and follow-up. Questionnaire to each practice to determine models and techniques of eye screening. SETTING: Ayrshire and Arran Health Board area, Scotland. SUBJECTS: All known diabetic patients. MAIN MEASURES: Proportion of diabetic patients who have had diabetic eye review and monitoring of risk factors within one year. Proportion of diabetic patients who have risk factors recorded within target level. Proportion of eye screening centres with recommended mechanisms in place. RESULTS: Both district general hospitals, and 59 of the 63 general practices, in the area took part in the audit. A total of 6,217 diabetic patients were included; the prevalence of diabetes in this population was 1.65%. Twenty-seven per cent were insulin treated. Seventy-two per cent of diabetics who were not registered blind had a record of having had fundoscopy performed through dilated pupils within one year. Sixty-nine per cent of those who were not registered blind had had corrected visual acuity measured within one year. Eighty-five per cent of diabetics had HbA1C recorded within one year and of these 65% had a level of 8% or less. Eighty-eight per cent had a blood pressure recording within twelve months and 52% of recorded pressures were 140/90 mmHg or less. Smoking status was recorded for 89% of patients and 75% of patients with a record were non-smokers. Representatives of 57 practices returned a completed questionnaire. All these practices had a Snellen chart, but only 83% had near vision testing equipment and only 54% had a pinhole occluder. CONCLUSIONS: An area wide collaborative audit provided local data to inform the process of guideline implementation and baseline data from which to evaluate this process. Wide stakeholder involvement increased interest, motivation and support for the process. The audit highlighted specific areas for change and provided the local stimulus for change.

A comparison of self-reported utilization of ophthalmic care for diabetes in managed care versus fee-for-service.

PURPOSE: To assess the association between structural factors in the health care delivery system and self-reported utilization of ophthalmic services by patients with diabetes in the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS). METHODS: Self-reported utilization of ophthalmic services within the 6 months preceding enrollment into the MOS among 522 of 567 individuals with diabetes in the MOS longitudinal panel was measured. Use of eye care services was regressed (logistic model) on patient demographics, geographic location, physician specialty, type of practice, and finance plan (prepaid or fee-for-service). RESULTS: None of the variables was significantly associated with a higher or lower likelihood of having used ophthalmic services in the preceding 6 months. Thus, no difference between prepaid or fee-for-service plans or among solo practice, large multispecialty groups, or HMOs were identified. Having seen an internist, family practitioner, or diabetes specialist for diabetes care was not related to use of ophthalmic services. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a presumed greater interest in preventive health, prepaid health plans were no more or less likely than the fee-for-service sector to have patients with diabetes reporting an eye examination within the prior 6 months. Thus, steps to improve the rate of eye examinations of diabetics may need to focus beyond the structural elements of the health care delivery system.

Primary care physicians' practice patterns and diabetic retinopathy. Current levels of care.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy is a costly and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: To assess primary care physicians' self-reported practice patterns for the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy relative to published guidelines. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: All primary care physicians (defined as general internists, family practitioners, and general practitioners) in Indiana were identified and surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. Of 2390 physicians, 1508 (63%) responded and were determined to be eligible. Of these 1508 physicians, 1058 (70%) completed all or some of the eye care-related questions. For each eye care practice, physicians were asked to specify the proportion of patients to which the practice was applied and the frequency (eg, every 3 months) with which the behavior was performed, if appropriate. Physicians were also asked to distinguish between patients with type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for each practice behavior. RESULTS: Physicians' responses were classified as "high," "moderate," or "low" based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Forty-five percent of the physicians' responses were classified as high for referring all of their patients with type I diabetes mellitus to an eye care specialist annually as were 35% of the physicians' responses for referring their patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Fewer physicians reported high levels of routine in-office funduscopic examination. No relationship was found between the extent to which physicians performed an in-office funduscopic examination and patterns of referral to eye care specialists. Logistic regression analysis suggested that recent graduates and general internists are most likely to report behavior that is considered high (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The diabetic retinopathy-related practice patterns of primary care physicians in Indiana differ significantly from published guidelines.

Use of ophthalmologic services by diabetic patients in Nova Scotia.

To evaluate the possible public health consequences of diabetic retinopathy in Nova Scotia, we investigated the number and frequency of ophthalmologic examinations in patients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 36,683 people (4.2%) were identified from the administrative database of the provincial health department as having a diagnostic code of diabetes during the period March 1987 to February 1990. All billings by ophthalmologists for these patients during the same period were then identified. Of the 36,129 patients aged 10 years or more, 17,518 (48.5%) had seen an ophthalmologist at least once during the study period, and 5218 (14.4%) had seen an ophthalmologist approximately annually. Increased age and being female were associated in univariate logistic regression analysis with higher use of ophthalmologic services. The medical insurance system is free of direct costs to patients, and there are enough ophthalmologists to meet patient needs (4.35 per 100,000 population). The findings indicate that most diabetic patients in Nova Scotia are not seen at least once a year, as recommended by the Expert Committee of the Canadian Diabetes Advisory Board, despite ready availability of ophthalmologic care.