Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 103
Filtrar
2.
Hawaii J Med Public Health ; 78(2): 66-70, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30766767

RESUMO

Hawai'i has comprehensive statewide tobacco control policies and was the first US state to raise the minimum age of sale, purchase, and possession of tobacco products to age 21 ("Tobacco 21") in a policy including not just cigarettes, but also electronic smoking devices and other tobacco products. This insights article provides strategic thinking about tobacco control advocacy planning. Specifically, we identify formative factors critical to building and sustaining our cross-sector, statewide advocacy infrastructure that has been able to address many ongoing challenges of tobacco-use prevention and control over time. This can provide new insights for other large-scale tobacco-control advocacy efforts.


Assuntos
Defesa do Consumidor , Colaboração Intersetorial , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Produtos do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Uso de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Havaí , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Pública , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Normas Sociais
4.
Am J Health Promot ; 32(4): 906-915, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29121792

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Sexual and reproductive health conditions (eg, infections, cancers) represent public health concerns for American women. The present study examined how knowledge of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) relates to receipt of preventive reproductive health services among women. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey. SETTING: Online questionnaires were completed via Amazon Mechanical Turk, a crowdsourcing website where individuals complete web-based tasks for compensation. PARTICIPANTS: Cisgendered women aged 18 to 44 years (N = 1083) from across the United States. MEASURES: Participants completed online questionnaires assessing demographics, insurance status, preventive service use, and knowledge of PPACA provisions. ANALYSIS: Chi-squares showed that receipt of well-woman, pelvic, and breast examinations, as well as pap smears, was related to insurance coverage, with those not having coverage at all during the previous year having significantly lower rates of use. Hierarchical logistic regressions determined the independent relationship between PPACA knowledge and use of health services after controlling for demographic factors and insurance status. RESULTS: Knowledge of PPACA provisions was associated with receiving well-woman, pelvic, and breast examinations, human papillomavirus vaccination, and sexually transmitted infections testing, after controlling for these factors. Results indicate that expanding knowledge about health-care legislation may be beneficial in increasing preventive reproductive health service use among women. CONCLUSION: Current findings provide support for increasing resources for outreach and education of the general population about the provisions and benefits of health-care legislation, as well as personal health coverage plans.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 59(5): 492-497, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28089611

RESUMO

Worldwide, poor lifestyle behaviors, including obesity, physical inactivity, and low diet quality, are creating an unstainable burden of chronic disease with disparities across geography, race, income, education, and sex. Government plays an important role in addressing lifestyle behaviors and population health, reducing health disparities and chronic disease. Areas for government involvement include surveillance, research, programming, access to health care, quality assurance and guidelines for diet and physical activity (PA). Some view government as paternalistic and favor individual choice; however, there is opportunity to unite diverse approaches with government working across sectors and engaging the private sector. The paper will conclude with specific evidence-based policy approaches to address obesity, nutrition, PA and tobacco use.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica , Programas Governamentais , Promoção da Saúde , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/prevenção & controle , Doença Crônica/psicologia , Regulamentação Governamental , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Promoção da Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/métodos
8.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; 21: 1-16, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27483555

RESUMO

Issue: Since enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), many more women have health insurance than before the law, in part because it prohibits insurer practices that discriminate against women. However, gaps in women's health coverage persist. Insurers often exclude health services that women are likely to need, leaving women vulnerable to higher costs and denied claims that threaten their economic security and physical health. Goal: To uncover the types and incidence of insurer exclusions that may disproportionately affect women's coverage. Method: The authors examined qualified health plans from 109 insurers across 16 states for 2014, 2015, or both years. Key findings and conclusions: Six types of services are frequently excluded from insurance coverage: treatment of conditions resulting from noncovered services, maintenance therapy, genetic testing, fetal reduction surgery, treatment of self-inflicted conditions, and preventive services not covered by law. Policy change recommendations include prohibiting variations within states' "essential health benefits" benchmark plans and requiring transparency and simplified language in plan documents.


Assuntos
Benefícios do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde da Mulher/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos , Mulheres
9.
Circulation ; 133(23): 2314-33, 2016 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27267538

RESUMO

Information on exposure to, and health effects of, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors is needed to develop effective strategies to prevent CVD events and deaths. Here, we provide an overview of the data and evidence on worldwide exposures to CVD risk factors and the associated health effects. Global comparative risk assessment studies have estimated that hundreds of thousands or millions of CVD deaths are attributable to established CVD risk factors (high blood pressure and serum cholesterol, smoking, and high blood glucose), high body mass index, harmful alcohol use, some dietary and environmental exposures, and physical inactivity. The established risk factors plus body mass index are collectively responsible for ≈9.7 million annual CVD deaths, with high blood pressure accounting for more CVD deaths than any other risk factor. Age-standardized CVD death rates attributable to established risk factors plus high body mass index are lowest in high-income countries, followed by Latin America and the Caribbean; they are highest in the region of central and eastern Europe and central Asia. However, estimates of the health effects of CVD risk factors are highly uncertain because there are insufficient population-based data on exposure to most CVD risk factors and because the magnitudes of their effects on CVDs in observational studies are likely to be biased. We identify directions for research and surveillance to better estimate the effects of CVD risk factors and policy options for reducing CVD burden by modifying preventable risk factors.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Comorbidade , Saúde Global/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Formulação de Políticas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento de Redução do Risco
10.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 30(5): 468-74, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27188679
12.
PLoS Med ; 13(4): e1001990, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27046234
13.
Milbank Q ; 94(1): 51-76, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994709

RESUMO

POLICY POINTS: Both the underuse and overuse of clinical preventive services relative to evidence-based guidelines are a public health concern. Informed consumers are an important foundation of many components of the Affordable Care Act, including coverage mandates for proven clinical preventive services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Across sociodemographic groups, however, knowledge of and positive attitudes toward evidence-based guidelines for preventive care are extremely low. Given the demonstrated low levels of consumers' knowledge of and trust in guidelines, coupled with their strong preference for involvement in preventive care decisions, better education and decision-making support for evidence-based preventive services are greatly needed. CONTEXT: Both the underuse and overuse of clinical preventive services are a serious public health problem. The goal of our study was to produce population-based national data that could assist in the design of communication strategies to increase knowledge of and positive attitudes toward evidence-based guidelines for clinical preventive services (including the US Preventive Services Task Force, USPSTF) and to reduce uncertainty among patients when guidelines change or are controversial. METHODS: In late 2013 we implemented an Internet-based survey of a nationally representative sample of 2,529 adults via KnowledgePanel, a probability-based survey panel of approximately 60,000 adults, statistically representative of the US noninstitutionalized population. African Americans, Hispanics, and those with less than a high school education were oversampled. We then conducted descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the prevalence of and sociodemographic characteristics associated with key knowledge and attitudinal variables. FINDINGS: While 36.4% of adults reported knowing that the Affordable Care Act requires insurance companies to cover proven preventive services without cost sharing, only 7.7% had heard of the USPSTF. Approximately 1 in 3 (32.6%) reported trusting that a government task force would make fair guidelines for preventive services, and 38.2% believed that the government uses guidelines to ration health care. Most of the respondents endorsed the notion that research/scientific evidence and expert medical opinion are important for the creation of guidelines and that clinicians should follow guidelines based on evidence. But when presented with patient vignettes in which a physician made a guideline-based recommendation against a cancer-screening test, less than 10% believed that this recommendation alone, without further dialogue and/or the patient's own research, was sufficient to make such a decision. CONCLUSIONS: Given these demonstrated low levels of knowledge and mistrust regarding guidelines, coupled with a strong preference for shared decision making, better consumer education and decision supports for evidence-based guidelines for clinical preventive services are greatly needed.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/organização & administração , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Benefícios do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Seguro Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Comunicação , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor/normas , Escolaridade , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Guias como Assunto/normas , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Benefícios do Seguro/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Análise de Regressão , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Urol ; 194(6): 1587-93, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26087383

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In October 2011 the USPSTF (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force) issued a draft guideline discouraging prostate specific antigen based screening for prostate cancer (grade D recommendation). We evaluated the effect of the USPSTF guideline on the number and distribution of new prostate cancer diagnoses in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified incident cancers diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2012 in NCDB (National Cancer Database). We performed an interrupted time series to evaluate the trend of new prostate cancers diagnosed each month before and after the draft guideline with colon cancer as a comparator. RESULTS: Incident monthly prostate cancer diagnoses decreased by -1,363 cases (12.2%, p<0.01) in the month after the USPSTF draft guideline and continued to decrease by 164 cases per month relative to baseline (-1.8%, p<0.01). In contrast monthly colon cancer diagnoses remained stable. Diagnoses of low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancers decreased significantly but new diagnoses of nonlocalized disease did not change. Subgroups of age, comorbidity, race, income and insurance showed comparable decreases in incident prostate cancer following the draft guideline. CONCLUSIONS: There was a 28% decrease in incident diagnoses of prostate cancer in the year after the USPSTF draft recommendation against prostate specific antigen screening. This study helps quantify the potential benefits (reduced harms of over diagnosis and overtreatment of low risk disease and disease found in elderly men) and potential harms (missed opportunities to diagnose important cancers in men who may benefit from treatment) of this guideline.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/normas , Idoso , Diagnóstico Tardio , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/normas , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/organização & administração , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Sex Transm Dis ; 41(9): 538-44, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25118966

RESUMO

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) contains a provision requiring private insurers issuing or renewing plans on or after September 23, 2010, to provide, without cost sharing, preventive services recommended by US Preventive Services Task Force (grades A and B), among other recommending bodies. As a grade A recommendation, chlamydia screening for sexually active young women 24 years and younger and older women at risk for chlamydia falls under this requirement. This article examines the potential effect on chlamydia screening among this population across private and public health plans and identifies lingering barriers not addressed by this legislation. Examination of the impact on women with private insurance touches upon the distinction between coverage under grandfathered plans, where the requirement does not apply, and nongrandfathered plans, where the requirement does apply. Acquisition of private health insurance through health insurance Marketplaces is also discussed. For public health plans, coverage of preventive services without cost sharing differs for individuals enrolled in standard Medicaid, covered under the Medicaid expansion included in the ACA, or those enrolled under the Children's Health Insurance Program or who fall under Early, Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment criteria. The discussion of lingering barriers not addressed by the ACA includes the uninsured, physician reimbursement, cost sharing, confidentiality, low rates of appropriate sexual history taking by providers, and disclosures of sensitive information. In addition, the role of safety net programs that provide health care to individuals regardless of ability to pay is examined in light of the expectation that they also remain a payer of last resort.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/legislação & jurisprudência , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Comportamento Sexual , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Anamnese , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA