[Use of the Symptom Validation Test BEVA in Social Medical Assessment]. / Einsatz des Beschwerdenvalidierungstests BEVA in der sozialmedizinischen Begutachtung.

The present study investigates whether the BEVA is suitable to detect negative response bias by claimants with psychosomatic symptoms in the social medical assessment. 107 claimants for disability pension to a psychosomatic disorder fulfilled the BEVA, SIMS and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The social medical examiners assess the credibility of the complaints representation. A Known-Group-Design and a Bootstrapping-Design was used to estimate the validity of the BEVA. For the external criterion SFSS the following psychometric characteristics for the BEVA could be determined: specificity=0.86, sensitivity=0.42, positive predictive value=0.81, negative predictive value=0.51. The interrater reliability estimates with Cohen κ=0.253. If the expert's assessments are chosen as external criterion following psychometric characteristics were estimated: specificity=0.71, sensitivity=0.32, positive predictive value=0.38, negative predictive value=0.66. The rater agreement is Cohen κ=0.031. The results show that the BEVA has an excellent specificity in the detection of negative response bias. This is highly desirable in terms of an ethically moral discussion. Furthermore, the study shows that - in addition to the expert estimates - further screenings can improve the assessment of negative response bias.

Self-inflicted burns in soldiers.

BACKGROUND: Self-inflicted burns are a multidisciplinary medical challenge. In contrast to the more common motive of attempted suicide in self-infliction of a burn, usually of a serious degree, a second motive is malingering. Motivation of this nature has been exhibited among Israeli soldiers who inflict on themselves low- to moderate-degree burns to obtain dismissal from mandatory military service. The purpose of our study is to investigate and define this phenomenon. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a population of 75 soldiers admitted to our Medical Center during the year 2010 with the diagnosis of any sort of burn. We set up a database including all relevant information about the burns including date and time of occurrence, cause, body location, depth of burn injury, area and shape of burn, etiology, and prescribed treatment. RESULTS: The summer was found to be the season with the highest incidence of burns. As far as the day of the week was influential, we found that the greater percentage of burns occurred at the beginning of the week. Most of the burns involved a minor surface area on the dorsal aspect of the foot. Scalding with hot water was the most common cause of burn. Eighty-one percent of the burns were atypical, being well demarcated.Most of the burn cases happened at home with no witnesses to the event. Sixty-one percent of the patients were not admitted to the hospital and were conservatively treated. CONCLUSIONS: Israeli soldiers tend to inflict burns on themselves for ulterior motives. Such burns are almost always minor with a small trauma area and sharp demarcations, and hence can be differentiated from other self-inflicted burns described in the literature. We found that most of the burns occur when the soldiers are on vacation at home. This is probably because the privacy allows them to carry out their act undisturbed. It is important to raise the awareness of attending physicians to the characteristics of these burns. Such patients should be evaluated by medical teams including mental health professionals to help them psychologically and to eliminate this unfortunate problem.

Clinical and medicolegal characteristics of neck injuries.

The predominance in performing surgery of major spine injuries by neurosurgeons usually has the consequence of treating all types of spine injuries by neurosurgeons - neurotraumatologists. In the neurosurgical wards of Clinical Hospital Rijeka, we take care of the majority of these patients, following both the major, as well as minor--whiplash injuries of the neck. This article is an overview of the patients admitted in the one year period (October 1st 2009-October 1st 2010) where 1077 cases of neck injuries were analyzed. Vast majority of these injuries were due to traffic accidents (over 94%), and only a small proportion were serious injuries that needed a surgical approach--decompression and stabilization (c1%). We analyzed minor neck injuries thoroughly both because of the increasing number of whiplash neck injuries and because more complicated diagnostic and therapeutic protocols occupy too much time in the ambulatory practice of our neurotraumatologists each year thus representing a growing financial burden to the health organizations and to the society as a whole. Our results proved that the majority of the injured are male (over 60%), young and active (almost two thirds 21-40 years of age), had commonly sustained a Quebec Task Force (QTF) injury of grades 2 and 3 (almost 90%), and, if properly treated, recovered completely after a mean therapy period of ten weeks. Only a minority complained of prolonged residual symptoms, some of them connected with medico-legal issues (less than 20%). The results shown are in contrast with the general opinion that malingerers in search of financial compensation prevail in these cases, and leads to the conclusion that minor neck injuries (including whiplash) as well as Whiplash Associated Disorder (WAD) are real traumatological entities, that have to be seriously dealt with.

Evaluation of the Atypical Response scale of the Trauma Symptom Inventory-2 in detecting simulated posttraumatic stress disorder.

This investigation evaluated the Atypical Response (ATR) scale of the Trauma Symptom Inventory - 2nd edition (TSI-2) in terms of its ability to distinguish genuine symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from simulated PTSD. Seventy-five undergraduate students were trained to simulate PTSD and were given monetary incentives to do so. Their responses on the PTSD Checklist (PCL), TSI-2 ATR, and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) validity scales were compared to responses of 49 undergraduate students with genuine symptoms of PTSD instructed to respond honestly on testing. Results indicate that the revised version of the ATR is superior to the original version in detecting malingered PTSD. Discriminant Function Analyses revealed correct classification of 75% of genuinely distressed individuals and 74% of PTSD simulators.

Social influences on the concept of fibromyalgia.

Despite relevant evidence of physical illness promoting fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), some authors claim that it is a psychological illness, or due to "psychological amplification." Good evidence for such views is lacking. Selection processes lead to increased rates of psychological illness in general practice and in specialist practice. The physical distress of FMS can increase both anxiety and depression. Questionable research supported by the insurance industry has tended to provide negative and disparaging views of pain. Current imaging studies support the view that central effects connected with FMS relate to the processing of noxious stimulation more than affective disorder.

Malingering in the medical setting.

Malingering of mental illness has been studied extensively; however, malingered medical illness has been examined much less avidly. While in theory any ailment can be fabricated or self-induced, pain--including lower back pain, cervical pain, and fibromyalgia--and cognitive deficits associated with mild head trauma or toxic exposure are feigned most frequently, especially in situations where there are financial incentives to malinger. Structured assessments have been developed to help detect both types of malingering; however, in daily practice, the physician should generally suspect malingering when there are tangible incentives and when reported symptoms do not match the physical examination or no organic basis for the physical complaints is found.

The prevalence of cognitive malingering in persons reporting exposure to occupational and environmental substances.

OBJECTIVE: Directly estimate the prevalence of cognitive malingering in persons claiming exposure to occupational and environmental substances. METHODS: Retrospective review of 128 neuropsychological cases with financial incentive. Estimates were based on two methods: (1) clinical identification using the Slick, Sherman and Iverson criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction (MND), and (2) statistical modeling based on patient performance on several individual psychometric indicators of malingering. RESULTS: The prevalence based on the clinical method was 40%. The statistically based estimates ranged from 30% to more than 45% depending on model parameters. Different incentive parameters may influence prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive malingering in toxic exposure is common and must be adequately addressed in the clinical neuropsychological assessment of toxic exposure and in research on its neurocognitive effects or findings will likely over-estimate the degree of cognitive impairment and related disability.

Are we honestly studying malingering? A profile and comparison of simulated and suspected malingerers.

Malingering research typically uses analog simulation design or differential prevalence design among "real" patients. Both have been criticized for methodological limitations in external and internal validity, respectively. Samples of simulated malingerers were compared to suspected malingerers to examine generalizability of analog findings. Overall results support the use of simulation designs. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that stringent selection of suspected malingerers maintains internal validity of the differential prevalence design. A second focus, to determine if demographic matching of simulated malingerers is necessary, showed that matching on age and race is not necessary.

Simulación en trabajadores que solicitan pensión por invalidez laboral / Malingering among workers seeking disability insurance

Objetivo: Describir la frecuencia y características de los trabajadores afiliados a la Seguridad Social con trastornos de simulación que solicitan pensión por invalidez. Material y métodos: Encuesta comparativa realizada en 136 trabajadores atendidos durante 2001, en quienes se identificaron tres grupos: trabajadores simuladores (TS), trabajadores sin invalidez (TSI), y trabajadores con invalidez (TCI). Para identificar las diferencias entre grupos, se aplicó la prueba z para variables escalares, y prueba de χ2 para variables nominales. Resultados: La incidencia de simuladores fue de 2.2/100,000 trabajadores. La edad media de los trabajadores fue: 41.9 ± 10.1 años, 440 fue el promedio de días de incapacidad laboral; 51(37%) trabajadores presentaron simulación. 35(26%) trabajadores fueron invalidados para el trabajo y 50(37%) sin invalidez. Los trabajadores simuladores tienen mayor nivel de escolaridad que TSI y TCI (p < 0.02); laboran mayoritariamente en la seguridad social (p < 0.05), con menor número de empleos previos (p < 0.05), presentan incapacidad laboral de mayor duración, (p<0.05), los síntomas depresivos son infrecuentes (p < 0.025) con electroencefalograma y tomografía normales. Conclusiones: Los trabajadores simuladores que demandan pensión por invalidez para el trabajo presentan características particulares diferentes a otros trabajadores que solicitan un estado de invalidez.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the frequency and characteristics of Mexican Social Security workers with malingering disorder that request disability pension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparative survey made among 136 workers seen during 2001, which were divided into three groups: malingering workers (MW), workers without disability (WOD), and workers with disability (WWD). We administered the Z Test for scaled variables and Z2 Test for nominal variables to identify group differences RESULTS: The incidence ofmalingering was of 2.2/100,000 workers. Mean age was 41.9 +/- 10.1 years, 440 was the average number of days of labor disability; 51 (37%) workers were malingerers. 35 (26%) workers were work disabled and 50 (37%) without disability. Malingerers had higher level of schooling compared with WOD and WWD (p < 0.02); most worked at the Social Security (p < 0.05), with lower number of previous jobs (p < 0.05), presented longer work disability (p < 0.05). Depressive symptoms were not frequently noted (p < 0.025) and all had normal electroencephalogram and brain computed tomography studies. CONCLUSIONS: Malingering workers who request work disability pensions follow a particular pattern that differs from other workers that request disability assessment at the Social Security Institute of Mexico.

Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration.

Base rates of probable malingering and symptom exaggeration are reported from a survey of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology membership. Estimates were based on 33,531 annual cases involved in personal injury, (n = 6,371). disability (n = 3,688), criminal (n = 1,341), or medical (n = 22,131) matters. Base rates did not differ among geographic regions or practice settings, but were related to the proportion of plaintiff versus defense referrals. Reported rates would be 2-4% higher if variance due to referral source was controlled. Twenty-nine percent of personal injury, 30% of disability, 19% of criminal, and 8% of medical cases involved probable malingering and symptom exaggeration. Thirty-nine percent of mild head injury, 35% of fibromyalgia/chronic fatigue, 31% of chronic pain, 27% of neurotoxic, and 22% of electrical injury claims resulted in diagnostic impressions of probable malingering. Diagnosis was supported by multiple sources of evidence, including severity (65% of cases) or pattern (64% of cases) of cognitive impairment that was inconsistent with the condition, scores below empirical cutoffs on forced choice tests (57% of cases), discrepancies among records, self-report, and observed behavior (56%), implausible self-reported symptoms in interview (46%), implausible changes in test scores across repeated examinations (45%), and validity scales on objective personality tests (38% of cases).

Dinâmica epidemiológica da tuberculose: um modelo matemático para simulaçäo da efetividade do diagnóstico e tratamento dos casos / Epidemiological dynamics of tuberculosis: a mathematical model for simulation of diagnosis effectivity and cases treatment

Modelo matemático multicompartimental, representado por um sistema de equaçöes diferenciaisordinárias, da dinâmica epidemiológica da tuberculose, que aborda o tratamento de casos infectantes, enquanto medida de controle. Destaca a ausência de resistência do bacilo ao esquema terapêutico, a mesma probabilidade de entrada em tratamento de casos já tratados anteriormente e casos novos e a ausência de circulaçäo do HIV. A simulaçäo do tratamento dos casos infectantes produz uma reduçäo acelerada da morbidade nos primeiros anos, após o que pode levar tanto a um novo equilíbrio, como produzir uma queda lenta, porém constante da morbidade tuberculosa, com tendência à extinçäo. O abandono do tratamento reduz a sua efetividade epidemiológica, mas, na maioria das situaçöes simuladas, näo anula completamente o impacto desta atividade de controle, mesmo no caso de taxas de abandono muito elevadas. É possivel produzir soluçöes em que o abandono do tratamento leve a um prejuízo epidemiológico em relaçäo o comportamento da doença na ausência da intervençäo, alterando-se parâmetros