Management of oculo-orbital complications of odontogenic sinusitis in adults.

Introduction: Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) is an infectious inflammatory pathology caused by a dental condition. Considering the anatomical relations with the orbit, maxillary sinus infection can easily spread, evolving into severe oculo-orbital complications that can sometimes be life-threatening. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective study of over 2 years, examining the data of 18 patients diagnosed with OMS with oculo-orbital complications. The patients were evaluated regarding their dental history, symptoms, clinical and endoscopic findings, ophthalmologic evaluation, bacteriologic tests, computed tomography (CT) imaging, medical and surgical treatment, and outcomes. Results: The age of the patients was between 24 and 65 years old with an almost equal gender distribution: 10 female and 8 male patients. From the total, 7 patients had type II diabetes, 2 of whom were insulin-dependent, 1 patient had thrombophilia and 2 patients had renal failure with peritoneal dialysis. Regarding the type of oculo-orbital complications, 10 patients were diagnosed with preseptal cellulitis and 8 with orbital cellulitis. Just 5 patients with orbital cellulitis required surgical treatment and orbitotomy was performed, followed by endonasal endoscopic drainage. The evolution after surgical treatment was favorable for all operated patients. Discussions: Oculo-orbital complications of OMS are typically more severe than those of rhinogenic sinusitis because anaerobic bacteria are involved. Immunosuppression represents a favorable environment for the development of OMS and its complications, diabetes being the most common risk factor. A negative prognostic feature is the appearance of ophthalmological symptoms in both eyes, so visual function may be reduced. The treatment of oculo-orbital complications of OMS is urgent and depends on a broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy associated or not with surgical intervention. Conclusions: The diagnosis of oculo-orbital complications of OMS is complex and requires clinical experience as well as extensive medical knowledge to treat both the cause and the consequences of the conditions quickly and effectively. The proper management of oculo-orbital complications is based on a multidisciplinary team: ophthalmology, ENT, dentistry, imaging, and laboratory. Abbreviations: OMS = odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, CT = computed tomography, ENT = ear-nose-throat, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, HNS = head and neck surgery.

Sinus culture differences in patients with radiographic evidence of odontogenic disease.

PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis is a well-known entity with a different pathogenesis than chronic rhinosinusitis. Nonspecific symptoms can make diagnosis difficult. This study aims to compare culture results between patients with and without computed tomography findings indicative of possible odontogenic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in which patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis over a three-year period at a single institution were reviewed. CT imaging was reviewed for evidence of dental disease, specifically periapical lucency, dehiscence of the floor of the maxillary sinus, oroantral fistula, or foreign body. Culture results were then assessed and compared between groups with CT evidence of a possible odontogenic source to those without. RESULTS: Overall, 231 patients were evaluated. 92 patients (39.8 %) were found to have evidence of a likely odontogenic source on CT. Cultures were available for 118 of 231 patients (51.1 %). Patients with CT signs of odontogenic disease were significantly more likely to grow Proteus mirabilis (p = 0.018) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (p = 0.037) on culture. Patients without CT signs of odontogenic sources were significantly more likely to grow Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.009). Of note, patients with CT findings concerning for an odontogenic source were also more likely to grow fungi other than Aspergillus and Mucor species on culture (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Patients with CT findings concerning for an odontogenic source of sinus disease showed differences in culture results that could be important in differentiating pathogenesis of sinus disease.

Inflammatory endotype of odontogenic sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is distinct from non-odontogenic rhinosinusitis with regard to clinical features as well as diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. While numerous studies have explored immune profiles of chronic rhinosinusitis, very few studies have explored the inflammatory endotype of ODS. METHODS: Odontogenic sinusitis was diagnosed by confirming infectious sinusitis adjacent to infectious maxillary odontogenic pathology. Maxillary sinus cultures and mucosal biopsies were obtained during endoscopic endonasal surgery in ODS and control patients. Controls were patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery with no sinus disease. Specimens were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Analysis was performed using a multiplex assay to measure Th-1 (TNFα, IFNγ, IL-2,12,18), Th-2 (IL-4,5,9,13), Th-17 (IL-17A,17F,22), and innate (CCL5,CXCL9,CXCL10, IL-6,8,10,12,23,27) immune pathways. Groups were compared via independent sample t-tests; if assumptions were violated, nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked sum tests were performed. RESULTS: Specimens from 22 ODS patients were compared to nine controls. ODS mucosal tissue was sampled in the setting of the following dental pathologies: post-dental extraction (n = 15), untreated apical periodontitis (n = 2), apical periodontitis after root canal therapy (n = 2), and maxillary sinus bone grafting with or without dental implantation (n = 3). The following cytokines were significantly elevated in ODS compared to controls: IFNγ, TNFα, IL-6, 8, 10, 27, and CXCL9. IL-17 levels were similar in both ODS and controls. Therefore, ODS demonstrated heightened innate and Th1 immune activity. CONCLUSION: ODS demonstrated both innate immune and Th1 inflammatory endotypes. Further studies are needed to explore ODS immunopathobiology and its potential impact on ODS management.

Do Symptoms Correlate with the Signs in Odontogenic Sinusitis with Periapical Lesions?

INTRODUCTION: Endodontic pathology is one of the most common causes of odontogenic sinusitis, and its evaluation is challenging. Omission of periapical lesions in diagnostic process leads to recurrent sinusitis after cessation of medical therapy. METHODS: Sixty-one symptomatic patients presented with odontogenic sinusitis with periapical lesions of teeth adjacent to the maxillary sinus were included in the study. Symptoms evaluated with SNOT-22 and OHIP-14 questionnaires were compared to signs during endoscopic and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: Coexistence of odontogenic sinusitis with nasal polyps significantly decreases the quality of life, especially concerning the emotional domain (p = 0.047). Patency of ostiomeatal corresponds well with the severity of sinonasal symptoms reported with SNOT-22 (p = 0.051). Extent of maxillary sinus opacifications scored with Zinreich scale correlates positively with the presence of discharge (p = 0.001) and edema (p = 0.072) in the endoscopic Lund-Kennedy scale. Among 67 teeth with periapical lesions, 73.1% had undergone previous root canal treatment, but in 47.8% of cases, it was defined as incomplete. Endodontic status did not affect the severity of patient's complaints. CONCLUSION: In case of odontogenic sinusitis of endodontic origin, endoscopic signs correlate better than radiological with the self-reported symptoms. In order to better evaluate the severity of the disease and possible need of surgical intervention, both otolaryngologists and dental specialists should focus on extent of inflammatory lesions in the maxillary sinus.

Unilateral, Rostral Maxillary Sinusitis Resulting from Displacement and Retention of an Alveolar Plug in a 4-Year-Old Horse.

Sinusitis is a common occurrence in horses and often develops secondary to dental disease. Extraction of cheek teeth in horses is associated with variable degrees of complications and although postoperative displacement and retention of alveolar plugs has been identified as one such potential complication, few cases of resulting sinusitis have been reported. This manuscript describes a four-year-old Thoroughbred mare that was presented for chronic unilateral left-sided mucopurulent nasal discharge after extraction of the left maxillary second molar tooth two months earlier. Radiographic and computed tomographic (CT) examinations revealed a well circumscribed, soft tissue opacity in the left rostral sinus compartment. Intraoral examination revealed feed impacted in the alveolus of the extracted tooth and an oral sinus fistula. Upper airway endoscopy showed thick, purulent material at the nasomaxillary aperture. Sinoscopy showed unexpectedly clean frontal, dorsal conchal and caudal maxillary sinuses. The alveolar dental plug associated with previous exodontia became apparent within the sinus and was removed through the sinoscopy portal. Repeat endoscopies confirmed progressive clearance of the sinusitis during hospitalization. Unilateral nasal discharge returned three months later. An abscess within the sinus had formed. Complete resolution of the sinusitis was achieved after lancing the abscess and further sinus lavage. Sinoscopy through a frontal sinus trephination portal proved useful in diagnosis and treatment. Detailed evaluation of structures allowed for rapid establishment of adequate drainage and communication between all sinus compartments without osteoplastic surgery.

[The development of posttraumatic maxillary sinusitis due to transconjunctival penetration of a foreign body with a fracture of the lower wall of the orbit]. / Razvitie posttravmaticheskogo verkhnechelyustnogo sinusita vsledstvie transkon"yunktival'nogo proniknoveniya inorodnogo tela s perelomom nizhnei stenki orbity.

The article presents a clinical example of the course of posttraumatic acute purulent sinusitis with reactive soft tissue phenomena due to the previous injury of the orbit by a foreign body, the introduction of the latter into orbit and the maxillary sinus result in a fracture of the lower wall of the orbit. A feature of the injury is the penetration of a foreign body through the conjunctiva of the lower eyelid and lower conjunctival fornix, without damaging the skin. This case is professionally interesting for both young doctors and experienced specialists in otolaryngology, ophthalmology, maxillofacial surgery and neurosurgery. Experts, analyzing this clinical example, will be able to correctly diagnose, effectively eliminate the inflammatory process in the maxillary sinus.

Ten-year experience with multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of odontogenic sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis is an underdiagnosed entity and is one cause of failure of conventional treatments of sinusitis. Unfortunately, there is no consensus so far on the best management protocol. This retrospective study aimed to suggest a practical management protocol that can reduce misdiagnosis and improve treatment outcomes. METHODS: The study included 74 patients with confirmed odontogenic sinusitis who were diagnosed and treated over 10 years (2010-2019). The patient data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Dental pain was reported in only 31.1 per cent of patients. Fifty-six patients (75.7 per cent) had received dental treatment during the last year, but only 13 (23.1 per cent) reported it. Dental pathology was missed on initial computed tomography evaluation in 24 patients (32.4 per cent). Forty-one patients (55.4 per cent) were successfully treated by dental procedures and antibiotics. Fourteen patients needed functional endoscopic sinus surgery in addition to dental procedures. CONCLUSION: Successful management of odontogenic sinusitis requires good communication between rhinologists, radiologists and dentists. Dental treatment should be the logical first step in the treatment protocol, unless otherwise indicated.

Predicting Odontogenic Sinusitis in Unilateral Sinus Disease: A Prospective, Multivariate Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is a common cause of unilateral sinus disease (USD), but can be challenging to diagnose due to nonspecific clinical presentations, potentially subtle to absent dental pathology on sinus computed tomography (CT), and underrepresentation in the sinusitis literature. OBJECTIVE: Identify sinonasal clinical variables predictive of ODS in patients presenting with unilateral maxillary sinus opacification on sinus CT. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 131 consecutive patients with USD and at least partial or complete maxillary sinus opacification on sinus CT. Patients' demographics, sinonasal symptoms (anterior and posterior drainage, nasal obstruction, facial pressure, smell loss, and foul smell), 22-item sinonasal outcome test, nasal endoscopy findings, CT findings, and histopathology were collected. Patients' diagnoses included ODS, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps, and inverted papilloma. Demographic and clinical data were compared between patients with unilateral ODS and non-odontogenic disease using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 131 USD patients, 65 had ODS and 66 had non-odontogenic disease. The following variables were significantly associated with unilateral ODS on multivariate analysis: middle meatal pus on endoscopy (OR= 17.67, 95% CI-5.69, 54.87; p = 0.001), foul smell (OR= 6.11, 95% CI-1.64, 22.82; p=.007), facial pressure (OR= 3.55, 95% CI-1.25, 10.12; p = 0.018), and any frontal opacification on CT (OR= 5.19, 95% CI-1.68, 16.06; p = 0.004). Any sphenoid opacification on CT was inversely related to ODS (OR = 0.14, 95% CI-0.03, 0.69; p = 0.016). The study was adequately powered. CONCLUSION: With unilateral maxillary sinus disease, the following features were significantly associated with ODS: foul smell, ipsilateral facial pressure, middle meatal pus on endoscopy, and any frontal sinus opacification on sinus CT. Additionally, any sphenoid sinus opacification on CT was inversely related to ODS. Presence or absence of these clinical variables can be used to increase or decrease one's suspicion of an odontogenic source of sinusitis.

Comparison of bacterial maxillary sinus cultures between odontogenic sinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is distinct from other forms of rhinosinusitis. Diagnosing ODS can be challenging because of nonspecific clinical presentations and underrepresentation in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare maxillary sinus bacterial cultures between patients with ODS and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), to determine whether certain bacteria are associated with ODS. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of 276 consecutive patients from August 2015 to August 2019 who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for bacterial ODS, CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), or CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). When present, pus was sterilely cultured from maxillary sinuses after maxillary antrostomy, and aerobic and anaerobic cultures were immediately sent for processing. Demographics and culture results were compared between ODS and CRS patients, and then separately between ODS and CRSsNP, and ODS and CRSwNP. ODS culture results were also compared between different dental pathologies (endodontic vs oroantral fistula). RESULTS: The following bacteria were significantly more likely in ODS compared to CRS: mixed anaerobes, Fusobacterium spp., Eikenella corrodens, Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus anginosus, and Streptococcus constellatus. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were inversely related to ODS. There were no significant differences in cultures between the different dental pathologies. CONCLUSION: Certain bacteria were more likely to be associated with ODS compared to CRS when purulence was cultured from the maxillary sinus. Physicians should evaluate for an odontogenic source of sinusitis when these ODS-associated bacteria are identified in maxillary sinus cultures.

Recognizing odontogenic sinusitis: A national survey of otolaryngology chief residents.

PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis is underrepresented in sinusitis literature as well as in the otolaryngology teaching curriculum sponsored by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngologists and residents in training may therefore have a decreased awareness of the condition. The objective of this study was to survey otolaryngology chief residents toward the ends of their training to determine how often they considered odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online REDCap survey was conducted from December 2018 to January 2019. Online surveys were emailed to 119 Otolaryngology residency program directors in the United States of America, which were then forwarded to their chief residents. Surveys included 3 demographic and 4 clinical questions. Clinical questions included 3 computed tomography-based questions requiring either differential diagnoses or most likely diagnosis, and 1 question on residents' perceived prevalence of odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Answer choices were tabulated and compared based on geographic region and post-residency career plans. RESULTS: Of 293 chief residents emailed, 94 completed the survey (32.1%). While answer choices on imaging-based questions varied, odontogenic sinusitis was generally underrecognized. Approximately 70% of residents felt odontogenic sinusitis represented 0%-40% of unilateral sinus opacification. There were no statistically significant differences in answers based on geographic distribution or post-residency career plans. CONCLUSIONS: Otolaryngology chief residents recognized odontogenic sinusitis with variable accuracy on imaging, and generally underestimated its prevalence as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Efforts should be made to teach otolaryngology residents about odontogenic sinusitis.

Case Report: A Rare Case of Silent Sinus Syndrome and Vertical Diplopia.

SIGNIFICANCE: Silent sinus syndrome is classically a maxillary sinus disease characterized by transient and variable vertical diplopia, hypoglobus, and enophthalmos. Uncommon presentations may exist, and although rare, it should be considered when diagnostic testing is inconsistent with more common etiologies of diplopia. PURPOSE: This study aimed to report an unusual presentation of silent sinus syndrome and review the thought process in diagnosing and managing this condition. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old white man presented to the eye clinic with left upper eyelid ptosis and intermittent vertical diplopia of 2-month onset. Clinical testing was variable, and initial differential diagnoses included a partial left pupil-sparing third nerve palsy involving the superior division, myasthenia gravis, and orbital disease. After extensive workup and review of his computed tomography images, the patient was diagnosed with severe chronic pansinusitis with an underlying condition known as silent sinus syndrome. He was referred to otorhinolaryngology for sinus decompression and oculoplastics for orbital reconstruction. While awaiting orbital reconstruction after decompression of multiple sinuses, he returned reporting a significant reduction in his diplopia. CONCLUSIONS: Vertical diplopia is a common complaint in primary care optometry. It is important to delve into more rare etiologies when clinical, laboratory, and radiological studies do not support the more common diagnoses.

Odontogenic Sinusitis: Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Odontogenic sinusitis is a unique cause of sinus disease that deserves special consideration. An astute clinician can elicit historical findings such as recent dental work, and symptoms such as unilateral facial pain and foul drainage, despite a relatively benign oral cavity examination. Otolaryngologists and dental professionals who care for these patients must be able to interpret imaging studies for dental disorder such as periapical abscesses and periodontal disease. Treatment is frequently some combination of antibiotic therapy, dental procedures, and endoscopic sinus surgery. More prospective studies are needed to determine the best approach to caring for this patient population.

Odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing tooth extraction: oral surgeon and otolaryngologist viewpoints and appropriate management.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to propose appropriate management for odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis. METHOD: Thirty-one adult patients with odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing maxillary extraction were retrospectively analysed. Patients with (n = 21) and without (n = 10) oroantral fistula on computed tomography were classified. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery was performed when sinusitis did not improve after extraction. The critical indicators for surgical requirement in the management of odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis were analysed. RESULTS: Sinusitis significantly improved after extraction in both groups. Patients without oroantral fistula had significantly more severe remnant sinusitis than those with oroantral fistula after extraction on computed tomography (p = 0.0037). The requirement for functional endoscopic sinus surgery was statistically significant for patients without orofacial fistula over those with orofacial fistula (p < 0.0001). The surgical improvement ratio was 93 per cent. CONCLUSION: The absence of oroantral fistula and severe sinusitis can be critical indicators for the requirement of functional endoscopic sinus surgery after extraction in the management of odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis.

An extremely rare and atypical paediatric presentation of a maxillary sinus haemangioma in the UK.

We present a rare and unusual case of a 16-year-old girl, with no significant medical history, presenting with right nasal obstruction and suspected sinusitis with occasional epistaxis and haemoptysis. On examination, she had a mass lesion in the right nasal cavity, with no evidence of other pathology on assessment of the ears, nose, throat or head and neck. A CT scan revealed an opacified right maxillary sinus with polypoidal mucosa, extending and passing through the accessory ostium into the right nasal cavity. Examination under anaesthesia with functional endoscopic sinus surgery and excision of the lesion was subsequently undertaken. Histological analysis confirmed the mass lesion as a haemangioma. This case report is the first to present a maxillary haemangioma presenting as nasal obstruction with intermittent sinusitis symptoms in a child. The authors discuss the incidence, presentation and management of maxillary haemangiomas in the paediatric population.

Silent Sinus Syndrome.

Silent sinus syndrom is rare and slow progressive disorder associated with asymptomatic chronic maxillary sinusitis and collapse of the orbital floor. The most common manifestations are enophtalmos, hypoglobus and pseudoretraction upper eyelid. Silent sinus syndrome is almost a unilateral condition and is usually diagnosed in patients in their 30´s and 40´s. The largest risk factors is underlaying aberrant nasal anatomy. The subsequent osteomeatal complex obstruction leads to hypoventilation of the maxillary sinus and negative pressure development. The sinus cavity is filed with a combination of mucus and acellular transudate. This proces create a chronic mucosal inflammation with demineralization and collapse of the orbital floor. CT imaging is pathognomonic and shows ipsilateral maxilar sinusitis and the orbital floor is inferiorly displaced. The differential diagnosis includes chronic sinusitis, osteomyelitis, malignat sinus infiltration and orbital trauma. The endoscopic antrostomy is the gold standard to re-establish normal sinus aeration. In this article we describe patient with silent sinus syndrome, who has been treated at our clinic and his symptoms were corrected ad integrum after the surgery.

Sinusitis Due to the Presence of a Dental Implant Inside the Maxillary Sinus.

The migration of a dental implant into the maxillary sinus is an uncommon event of occurrence. Disrespect for concepts of implantology, low alveolar bone density at the site, high incidence of masticatory force in posterior region, and clinical intercurrences predispose to failure in rehabilitation.

ACTUAL ISSUES OF ODONTOGENIC MAXILLARY SINUSITIS (REVIEW).

Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis has now increasing incidence in dental and otorhynolaryngological practice. Its incidence varies from 10-12 % to 50-75 %, according to different authors. Literature study showed that odontogenic maxillary sinusites are mostly unilateral, and significantly differ in complaints, clinical signs, and diagnostic and treatment measures from other types of sinusitis. This should be taken into account, because often odontogenic maxillary sinusitis is misdiagnosed with common sinusitis, and only in 77 % such patients are examined by both dental specialist and otorhynolaryngologist. Study of causes of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis revealed that now iatrogenic impact prevails over other causes, which had been previously considered as main causes of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Especially endodontic treatment and implantation surgery are major causes of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis in present time, due to increasing incidence of perforation and damage of sinus by filling materials, bone or tooth particles, and implants. Anatomical structure of dental-sinus border area, and volume of endodontic treatment and implanting procedures, determines last ones as causative triggers due to development of complications and inflammatory processes. Microbial flora is mostly presented by anaerobic microorganisms; at the same time aerobic and fungal organisms are found in the microscopy of histology of patients with odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. At the same time, polymicrobial associations show high resistance to wide spectrum of antimicrobial medications. In past years theory of microbial biofilms is considered leading in explanation of recurrent and persistent odontogenic sinusitis. Such polymicrobial associations are covered with complex shield of different compounds, providing protection and nutrients. This significantly complicates treatments and can cause recalcitrant and recurrent infections.

Fatal primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the maxillary sinus initially treated as an infectious disease in an elderly patient: A clinicopathologic report.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the maxillary sinus in an 82-year-old Caucasian woman. BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the maxillary sinus has non-specific signs and symptoms that may be confused with benign inflammatory conditions and upper respiratory infections. METHODS: An incisional biopsy was performed. CD20+ /CD3- /Ki-67: 95% cells were observed. CONCLUSION: A good medical history, clinical and imaging evaluations and immunohistochemical reactions are crucial to establish a correct and early diagnosis of DLBCL.

Nonhealing orbital floor fracture in a pediatric patient: A unique presentation of pseudo-silent sinus syndrome.

Silent sinus syndrome was first described as spontaneous enophthalmos and hypoglobus associated with subclinical maxillary sinusitis without prior trauma or surgery. This clinical entity has later been described after trauma in which damage to the ostiomeatal complex leads to atelectasis of the maxillary sinus. We report a case of a 14-year-old boy who presented 4 years after sustaining a non-operative orbital floor fracture with enophthalmos and transient diplopia. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated enlargement in size of the original orbital floor fracture and bilateral maxillary sinus disease. Bilateral chronic sinusitis suggested an anatomical predisposition to sinusitis unrelated to the prior trauma. The authors propose that, in this case, negative pressure in the maxillary sinus and chronic inflammation led to bone resorption and failure of the orbital fracture to heal. This differs from prior reports of silent sinus syndrome in that there was complete resorption of bone of the orbital floor and no decrease in volume of the maxillary sinus given the open communication of the sinus and the orbit, making this a unique presentation of pseudo-silent sinus syndrome in a pediatric patient.