Clinical experience and complications with limited pleural dissection combined with a novel, simplified technique for thoracic Redon-like drain in vertebral body tethering.

PURPOSE: To report on our experience with a simplified, suction-bottle-drain technique of thoracic drain (Redon-like) combined with fully thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering (VBT) and a limited pleural approach, with particular focus on the rate of pulmonary complications. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients who underwent VBT for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. For all subjects, a 10G Redon drain, an active drain system consisting of a perforated tube and a suction bottle, was placed intrathoracically and tunneled under the skin. All drains were removed on the first postoperative day. Perioperative and postoperative data such as type of access, length of surgery, amount of fluid collection in the drain, and length of hospital stay were collected. The type and number of pulmonary complications occurring in the first 3 months after surgery, along with their symptoms and management, were recorded. RESULTS: One Hundred eighty-two patients were included in the analysis. The mean length of surgery was 97 min (75-120). The average fluid collection in the drain was 30 ml (5-50), the mean length of hospital stay was 3 days (2-4). During the observation period, pulmonary complications occurred in five patients (2%). Two patients presented an aseptic right pleural effusion; for two patients, a residual pneumothorax was diagnosed on the X-rays in the recovery room and one patient developed a chylothorax. All patients recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSION: The simplified, Redon-like drain combined with a fully thoracoscopic VBT and limited pleural approach seems a safe and effective alternative to the chest drain. This technique allows to remove the drain on the first postoperative day, thus simplifying the management of the patients and improving their comfort.

Effect of intraoperative abdominal lavage versus suction alone on postoperative wound infection in patients with appendicitis: A meta-analysis.

There is much controversy about the application of abdominal irrigation in the prevention of wound infection (WI) and intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) in the postoperative period. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of the effect of suctioning and lavage on appendectomy to assess the efficacy of either suctioning or lavage. Data were collected and estimated with RevMan 5.3 software. Based on our research, we found 563 publications in our database, and we eventually chose seven of them to analyse. The main results were IAA after the operation and WI. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials of an appendectomy with suctioning or lavage. In the end, seven trials were chosen to meet the eligibility criteria, and the majority were retrospective. The results of seven studies showed that there was no statistically significant difference between abdominal lavage and suctioning treatment for post-operative WI (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.40, 2.61; p = 0.96); There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the risk of postoperative abdominal abscess after operation (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.71, 1.89; p = 0.56). No evidence has been found that the use of abdominal lavage in the treatment of postoperative infectious complications after appendectomy is superior to aspiration.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating effects of prophylactic irrigation-suction near pancreaticojejunostomy on postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, whether irrigation-suction (IS) decreases the incidence and severity of CR-POPF has not yet been well elucidated. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with planned PD were enrolled in the study at a high-volume pancreatic center in China from August 2018 to January 2020. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate whether irrigation-suction (IS) decreases the incidence and severity of CR-POPF and other postoperative complications after PD. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CR-POPF, and the secondary endpoints were other postoperative complications. RESULTS: Sixty patients were assigned to the control group and 60 patients to the IS group. The IS group had a comparable POPF rate (15.0% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.806) but a lower incidence of intra-abdominal infection (8.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.033) than the control group. The incidences of other postoperative complications were comparable in the two groups. The subgroup analysis for patients with intermediate/high risks for POPF also showed an equivalent POPF rate (17.0% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.800) and a significantly decreased incidence of intra-abdominal infection (8.5% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.020) in the IS group than that in the control group. The logistic regression models indicated that POPF was an independent risk factor for intra-abdominal infection (OR 0.049, 95% CI 0.013-0.182, p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Irrigation-suction near pancreaticojejunostomy does not reduce the incidence or severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula but decreases the incidence of intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Aspiration Prevention Surgery: Clinical Factors Associated With Improvements in Oral Status Intake and Suction Frequency.

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, the use of aspiration prevention surgery (APS) for the treatment of severe dysphagia has been on the rise. However, relevant clinical studies have included small samples, and the frequency of, and risk factors for postoperative complications have not been clarified. We investigated the clinical features of patients undergoing APS and whether oral-intake status and suction frequency could be reduced. STUDY DESIGN: A case series. SETTING: Single-institution academic center. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated medical charts generated from 2010 to 2021. The clinical characteristics of patients undergoing APS, changes in the oral-intake status (Functional Oral Intake Scale, FOIS), suction frequency before and after surgery, risk factors for postoperative complications, and factors contributing to improvements in postoperative oral-intake status were retrieved. RESULTS: We included the data of 100 patients (median age: 65 years, 72 men). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was the most common primary disease (28%), and glottis closure was the most common APS (69%). Postoperatively, 78% of patients showed improvements in the FOIS score, and suction frequency decreased in 85% of cases. Postoperative complications were observed in 10 patients (10%), wound infection in 6, and bleeding in 4; all improved. Higher preoperative FOIS scores were significantly associated with postoperative complications (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: APS contributed to improving the FOIS score and helped reduce the suction frequency in most cases. APS can be performed safely with proper perioperative management, even in patients with poor preoperative general conditions and nutritional status.

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with preperitoneal closed-suction drainage reduced postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair has the advantages of less bleeding, less trauma, less pain, and fast recovery, there are several issues that need to be addressed. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of preperitoneal closed­suction drainage on reducing postoperative complications in TEP inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 122 patients who underwent TEP inguinal hernia repair between June 2018 and June 2021 was performed. The patients were divided into the drainage group and the non-drainage group according to whether the drainage tube was placed or not. Clinical data, surgical procedures and outcome of these patients were collected and analyzed to assess the effectiveness of drainage. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients undergoing TEP surgery were screened, of which 22 were excluded. Most of the patients were male with right indirect inguinal hernia. There was no difference in the mean length of hospital stay between the two groups. Postoperative pain was alleviated by preperitoneal closed­suction drainage 24 h after operation (p = 0.03). The rate of complications such as scrotal edema, seroma and urinary retention in the drainage group was significantly lower than that in the non-drainage group (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that drainage was beneficial to reduce postoperative complications (OR, 0.015; 95% CI, 0.002-0.140; p < 0.01). In addition, it was worth noting that in subgroup analysis, patients with hernia sac volume > 10 cm3 might receive more clinical benefits by placing drainage tube. CONCLUSION: In TEP inguinal hernia repair, placing drainage tube is a simple and feasible traditional surgical treatment, which can promote postoperative recovery without increasing the risk of infection, especially in patients with large hernia sac volume.

Current evidence for suction in endourological procedures: comprehensive review of literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To identify the latest advances on the utilization of suctioning devices in the surgical treatment of urinary stones. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances are being made to incorporate suction and pressure control capabilities in percutaneous and ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Multiple retrospective studies and few prospective studies have shown that suctioning with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy, commonly referred to as Super MiniPerc, can lead to better stone-free rates (SFR) and shorter operative time with lower incidence of infectious complications. Suctioning during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has mainly been achieved through suctioning ureteral access sheath. Here as well, the incorporation of suction improved the SFR, but most importantly, reduced the risk of postoperative infectious complications. SUMMARY: Theoretically suction in endourological procedures could facilitate stone debris removal and could reduce intrarenal pressure at the same time allowing for increased irrigation flow potentially decreasing operation time and infectious complications. These claims are supported in contemporary clinical studies, reporting superior SFR and reduced postoperative infectious complications in both percutaneous nephrolithotomy and RIRS.

[Complications and their management in the surgical treatment of lipohyperplasia dolorosa]. / Komplikationen und deren Management bei der chirurgischen Behandlung der Lipohyperplasia dolorosa.

BACKGROUND: There are both conservative and surgical treatment options for lipohyperplasia dolorosa (LiDo). A procedure that has been established since 1997 is the surgical treatment through lymphological liposculpture according to Cornely™. AIM: After extensive suctioning of the extremities, an extensive subcutaneous wound cavity with a trabecular connective tissue scaffold remains. Nevertheless, surgery-related complications are rare. Postoperative management and administration of antibiotics and antithrombotics are reviewed. The therapies for complications are presented in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, the frequencies of adverse events in 1400 LiDo surgeries in 2020 were evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 47.81 years (range 16-78 years). Symmetrically, 504 outer legs (outer half of the limb [BA]), 504 inner legs (inner half of the limb [BI]), and 392 arms [A] were surgically treated. RESULTS: Relevant adverse events rarely occurred: infections (1.79%), seromas (0.79%), erysipelas (0.28%), necrosis (0.14%) and deep vein thrombosis (0.07). DISCUSSION: We were able to reduce the rate of postoperative complications to 3.07% in the Lymphological Liposculpture™ regime for the surgical treatment of LiDo. In their meta-analysis on liposuction, Kanapathy et al. reported an overall incidence of major surgical complications of 3.48%. The overall incidence of minor surgical complications was 11.62%, with seroma (5.51%) being the most common minor complication [26]. Kruppa et al. report that the liposuction procedure including fat removal for esthetic reasons has a complication rate of 9.5%. Wound infections with 4.5% and the formation of erysipelas with 4% are clearly in the foreground [20].

The power of suction: Theory and practice in closed suction vs gravity drains and postoperative pancreatic fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a feared complication in pancreatic resection. Gravity drainage (GD) is hypothesized to reduce POPF versus closed-suction drainage (CSD). We sought to evaluate this theory. METHODS: Six-hundred-twenty-nine patients undergoing pancreatic resection between 2013 and 2020 were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression for the outcomes of POPF and clinically-relevant POPF (crPOPF). RESULTS: Three-hundred-ninety-seven patients (63.1%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 232 (36.9%) underwent distal pancreatectomy. Suction drains were placed in 588 patients (93.5%) whereas 41 (6.5%) had GDs. One-hundred-twenty-five (27.6%) experienced a POPF; 49 (10%) crPOPFs. On multivariable analysis, suction drainage was not associated with increased risk of POPF (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.30-1.93, P = 0.57) or crPOPF (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.30-3.26, P = 0.98). CONCLUSION: Suction drainage does not promote POPF when compared to GDs. Drain type should be determined by surgeon preference, while taking into account nursing and patient-specific considerations especially when patients are discharged with drains.

Effects of endotracheal tube fixation methods on haemodynamic parameters during endotracheal suction: A single-blind non-randomized clinical trial study.

AIM: This study aimed to determine the effect of the methods used in endotracheal tube fixation on haemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation) during endotracheal suction. METHODS: The sample of this prospective, parallel two-armed, single-blind non-randomized clinical trial study included 86 intubated patients treated in the cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit between September 2016 and December 2017. The endotracheal tube was fixed with tube holders in the intervention group (n = 43), whereas the endotracheal tube was fixed with plasters in the control group (n = 43). The patients' haemodynamic parameters were measured before, during, at the end of suction, and 5 and 15 min after suction. RESULTS: In comparison with the patients with plasters, patients with tube holders had significantly lower systolic blood pressure 15 min after endotracheal suction and significantly lower diastolic blood pressure during and at the end of endotracheal suction. Oxygen saturation of the patients with tube holder during, at the end, and following 5 min after endotracheal suction were higher than patients with plaster. Heart rate was not affected during endotracheal suction in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study showed the tube holder affected the haemodynamic parameters during endotracheal suction less than the plaster.

A Critical Analysis of Rectal Biopsy to Exclude Hirschsprung's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Most Hirschsprung's disease (HD) are diagnosed in young children with increased risk ("red flag"). Older children (>6 months) require open rectal biopsy (ORB) with its own impact on risk and resources. We investigated if "red flag", age, and sex used in combination could exclude HD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: "Red flags" are risk factors associated with HD, including neonatal bowel obstruction, genetic association, failure of passage of meconium in <48 hours, infantile constipation, distension with vomiting, or family history. All rectal biopsies (2015-2018) were reviewed for indications, methods, and histopathological findings. Logistic regression analysis was adopted to assess predictive value of "red flag," age, and sex (p < 0.05* was significant). RESULTS: A total of 187 children underwent 84 suction rectal biopsies and 113 ORBs (n = 197 in total). Final histopathological diagnoses were non-HD (n = 154) and HD (n = 43). Total 78% of rectal biopsies were non-HD, of which 63% by ORB. Non-HD was associated with absence of "red flag" (49 vs. 16%*), increased age at biopsy (22 months vs. 28 days*), >6 months old (62 vs. 30%*), and female gender (54 vs. 16%*), compared with HD. In the absence of "red flag," 7/82 (9%) had HD (negative predictive value = 91%). Logistic regression analysis found absent "red flag" predicted non-HD biopsy with odds ratio 4.77 (1.38, 16.47), corrected for age and sex. CONCLUSION: Negative rectal biopsy rate for HD is very high. The majority required ORB. Although "red flag" and gender, but not age, have strong predictive values, it is inadequate for excluding HD. This study supports the need for alternative strategies in excluding HD.

Comparison of Vacuum Suction Sheath and Non-Vacuum Suction Sheath in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) with vacuum suction sheath in the treatment of renal calculi. Methods: We collected relevant studies of vacuum suction sheath and non-vacuum sheath mPCNL from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for a meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: 7 studies were included (4 randomized controlled studies, 3 retrospective studies involving 1803 patients). The final meta-analysis results showed that the operative time (Standardised Mean Difference [SMD] = -0.84, 95% CI [-1.20; -0.48], P < 0.001), auxiliary procedures (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% CI [0.46; 0.81], P < 0.001) and complications in the vacuum suction sheath group were significantly lower than those in the non-vacuum sheath group. The immediate and final stone-free rates (OR = 1.69, 95% CI [1.30; 2.18], P < 0.001; OR = 1.44, 95% CI [0.98; 2.13], P = 0.039) were also significantly lower in the vacuum suction sheath group. Conclusion: This study indicates that the application of vacuum suction sheath in mPCNL can significantly shorten the operative time and patient hospitalization, reduce auxiliary procedures and complications (especially fever, urinary tract infection, and pain).

Suctioning Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The suctioning access sheath (SAS) is a novel access sheath connected to a negative pressure suction device and absorbs fragments. Some comparative studies have reported SAS with a higher stone-free rate and lower operative time. However, no higher-level evidence was published to support SAS. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of SAS versus traditional access sheath (TAS) for the treatment of renal stones in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using Pubmed, Embase(Ovid), Medline（EBSCO）, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, and Sinomed to search comparative studies as recent as December 2020 that assessed the safety and effectiveness of SAS in PCNL. The quality of retrospective case-control studies (RCCs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane risk of bias tool, respectively. The Oxford center set up evidence-based medicine was used to assess the level of evidence (LE). Statistical analyses were performed by the comprehensive meta-analysis program. RESULTS: Seven studies, with a total of 1655 patients, were included. Compared with the TAS group, the SAS group had a shorter operative time (MD= -17.30; 95%CI:-23.09,-11.51; P＜.00001), higher stone-free rate (OR=2.37;95%CI:1.56,3.61;P<.0001), fewer total complication rate (OR=0.50;95%CI:0.35,0.70;P<.0001), lower auxiliary procedures rate  (OR=0.48;95%CI:0.36,0.64; P<.00001), and lower postoperative fever rate (OR=0.46;95%CI:0.34,0.62;P＜.00001). CONCLUSION: The SAS can significantly improve MPCNL in the stone-free rate, operative time, and total complication rate, especially for auxiliary procedures and postoperative fever rates.

Vacuum Drains versus Passive Drains versus No Drains in Decompressive Craniectomies-A Randomized Controlled Trial on Subgaleal Drain Complication Rates (VADER Trial).

OBJECTIVE: Subgaleal drains are generally deemed necessary for cranial surgeries including decompressive craniectomies (DCs) to avoid excessive postoperative subgaleal hematoma (SGH) formation. Many surgeries have moved away from routine prophylactic drainage but the role of subgaleal drainage in cranial surgeries has not been addressed. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial at 2 centers. A total of 78 patients requiring DC were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into 3 groups: vacuum drains (VD), passive drains (PD), and no drains (ND). Complications studied were need for surgical revision, SGH amount, new remote hematomas, postcraniectomy hydrocephalus (PCH), functional outcomes, and mortality. RESULTS: Only 1 VD patient required surgical revision to evacuate SGH. There was no difference in SGH thickness and volume among the 3 drain types (P = 0.171 and P = 0.320, respectively). Rate of new remote hematoma and PCH was not significantly different (P = 0.647 and P = 0.083, respectively), but the ND group did not have any patient with PCH. In the subgroup analysis of 49 patients with traumatic brain injury, the SGH amount of the PD and ND group was significantly higher than that of the VD group. However, these higher amounts did not translate as a significant risk factor for poor functional outcome or mortality. VD may have better functional outcome and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of complication rates, VD, PD, and ND may be used safely in DC. A higher amount of SGH was not associated with poorer outcomes. Further studies are needed to clarify the advantage of VD regarding functional outcome and mortality, and if ND reduces PCH rates.

Comparative study of suction drainage placement in cementless hip replacement among patients undergoing extended thromboprophylaxis: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The use of drains reportedly does not improve surgical outcomes after hip replacement. There is still a lack of strict recommendations for drain placement after primary hip replacement. This study aimed to assess the safety of not using suction drainage after primary hip replacement in a population of patients undergoing extended thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, all patients were qualified for primary hip replacement and were divided into two groups: with and without drainage. The inclusion criterion was idiopathic hip osteoarthritis. The exclusion criteria were secondary coxarthrosis, autoimmune disease, coagulopathy, venous/arterial thrombosis, hepatic/renal insufficiency, cement, or hybrid endoprostheses. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic parameters were measured for the first three days after surgery. Hematoma collection, due to extended thromboprophylaxis, in the joint and soft tissues was evaluated precisely. The patients underwent follow-up for 30 days. RESULTS: The final analysis included a total of 100 patients. We did not find any significant statistical differences between groups in terms of hip fluid collection (9.76 vs. 10.33 mm, with and without drainage, respectively; mean difference, 0.6 mm; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -2.8 to 3.9; p = 0.653), estimated blood loss (1126 vs. 1224 ml; mean difference, 97.1 ml; 95 % CI -84.1 to 278.2; p = 0.59), and hemoglobin levels on postoperative day 3 (11.05 vs. 10.85 g/dl; mean difference, 0.2; 95 % CI -2.1 to 2.5; p = 0.53). In addition, the other parameters did not show significant differences between groups. Notably, two cases of early infections were observed in the no-drainage group, whereas there were no such complications in the drainage group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the use of closed suction drainage after primary hip replacement is a safe procedure in patients undergoing extended thromboprophylaxis. Further research is warranted to validate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was successfully registered retrospectively at Clinicaltrial.gov with the identification number NCT04333264  03 April 2020.

Aerosol Generation During Laryngology Procedures in the Operating Room.

OBJECTIVE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 spreads through respiratory fluids. We aim to quantify aerosolized particles during laryngology procedures to understand their potential for transmission of infectious aerosol-based diseases. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective quantification of aerosol generation. METHODS: Airborne particles (0.3-25 µm in diameter) were measured during live-patient laryngology surgeries using an optical particle counter positioned 60 cm from the oral cavity to the surgeon's left. Measurements taken during the procedures were compared to baseline concentrations recorded immediately before each procedure. Procedures included direct laryngoscopy with general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA), direct laryngoscopy with jet ventilation, and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser use with or without jet ventilation, all utilizing intermittent suction. RESULTS: Greater than 99% of measured particles were 0.3 to 1.0 µm in diameter. Compared to baseline, direct laryngoscopy was associated with a significant 6.71% increase in cumulative particles, primarily 0.3 to 1.0 µm particles (P < .0001). 1.0 to 25 µm particles significantly decreased (P < .001). Jet ventilation was not associated with a significant change in cumulative particles; when analyzing differential particle sizes, only 10 to 25 µm particles exhibited a significant increase compared to baseline (+42.40%, P = .002). Significant increases in cumulative particles were recorded during CO2 laser use (+14.70%, P < .0001), specifically in 0.3 to 2.5 µm particles. Overall, there was no difference when comparing CO2 laser use during jet ventilation versus GETA. CONCLUSIONS: CO2 laser use during laryngology surgery is associated with significant increases in airborne particles. Although direct laryngoscopy with GETA is associated with slight increases in particles, jet ventilation overall does not increase particle aerosolization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:2759-2765, 2021.

Analysis of the curative effect and influencing factors of stereotactic aspiration in the treatment of primary brainstem haemorrhage.

Primary brainstem haemorrhage (PBH) is characterized by acute onset, rapid deterioration, many complications, and poor prognosis. Its treatment has been controversial. This study aimed to explore the clinical risk factors of postoperative survival and neurological function recovery of stereotactic aspiration in the treatment of PBH. The clinical data of 65 patients with severe brainstem haemorrhage from February 2019 to February 2020 in the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University were reviewed. All patients were treated with stereotactic haematoma aspiration. We determined the survival status of patients at 30 days after the operation and the recovery of neurological function at 90 days. The modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) was used to assess the survival status. The 30-day mortality rate was 23.1% (15 patients). The proportion of patients with good neurological recovery at 90 days after the operation was 32.3% (21 patients). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the haematoma classification was an independent risk factor for postoperative survival (OR = 0.197, 95% CI: 0.016-0.385, p = 0.046) and recovery of neurological function 90 days after surgery (OR = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.001-0.267, p = 0.003). The haematoma classification is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality and recovery of neurological function 90 days after surgery. Massive and basal-tegmental haematomas were associated with higher mortality. The prognosis of patients with unilateral and bilateral tegmental haematoma was better than that of patients with other haematoma types.

Effects of Sequence of Irrigation, Suction, and Extraction in Cases of Acute Purulent Appendicitis or Gangrenous Perforated Appendicitis After Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Objective: To evaluate rates of postoperative infection in patients with acute purulent appendicitis or gangrenous perforated appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study the medical records of patients who had undergone LA for acute appendicitis at Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College between January 2015 and December 2019 were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the sequential order in which peritoneal irrigation, suction, and extraction of appendix had been performed. In Group 1 peritoneal irrigation and suction had been performed before extraction of the appendix, and in Group 2 they had been performed after extraction of the appendix. Demographic details, surgery duration, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization expenses, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: The final study sample included 571 patients, 116 (20.3%) in Group 1 and 455 (79.7%) in Group 2. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, preoperative white blood cell counts, surgery durations, lengths of hospital stay, or total hospitalization expenses between the 2 groups (P > .05). Time to first flatus was significantly shorter in Group 1 (2.1 ± 0.5 days) than in Group 2 (2.3 ± 0.6) (P = .016), and the incidence of surgical wound infection was lower in Group 1 (6.9%) than in Group 2 (14.1%) (P = .038). There were no significant differences in the rates of intra-abdominal abscess, small bowel obstruction, or readmission within 30 days between the 2 groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Patients with acute purulent appendicitis or gangrenous perforated appendicitis are at high risk of surgical wound infection. Peritoneal irrigation and suction before appendix extraction may reduce the incidence of postoperative wound infection.

The impact of roller pump-assisted cardiotomy suction unit on hemolysis.

Hemolysis in cardiac surgery is often related to the contact of blood with air or artificial surfaces. Variations of negative pressure in the suction cannulas may represent an additional factor. Limited data exist on the contribution of a roller pump-assisted (RPA) cardiotomy suction unit to hemolysis. Elevation of free hemoglobin (fHb) following air suction (AS) or suction tip occlusion (STO) events of a pump-assisted cardiotomy suction unit was investigated in a mock circuit filled with blood from slaughtered domestic pigs. AS-associated hemolysis was measured over 240 minutes with 2 minutes of AS occurring every 10 minutes. STO-associated hemolysis was analyzed over 80-minute periods: configuration 1 (c1) comprised a cycle of 20 minutes (min) occlusion and 60 minutes RPA flow (20/60 minutes); c2 comprised 20 cycles of 1/3 minutes; c3 comprised 40 cycles of 0.5/1.5 minutes; and c4 comprised 80 cycles of 0.25/0.75 minutes. The AS setup did not lead to significant hemolysis after 2 (P = .97), 3 (P = .40) or 4 (P = .11) hours. The STO setup showed the greatest hemolysis (ΔfHb of 30 mg/dL) in c1 after 20 minutes. ΔfHb was different in c1 from all other configurations at 20 minutes (P < .0001) and 80 minutes (P < .05). Ex vivo generation of large negative pressures by STO events is the main cause of cardiotomy suction-associated hemolysis. The clinical relevance of this mechanism needs further investigations.

Should Drains Suck? A Propensity Score Analysis of Closed-Suction Versus Closed-Gravity Drainage After Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains one of the most common complications after pancreatic surgery. We previously reported that the majority of US surgeons leave drains after pancreatectomy. However, there remains controversy and surgeon bias on the use of gravity compared with suction drainage with limited data on patient outcomes to guide management. METHODS: Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative, and outcome data were captured from the most recent ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)-targeted pancreatectomy databases. This is a retrospective cohort analysis comparing closed-suction to closed-gravity drains with multivariate analysis and propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Of 9232 patients that underwent a pancreatectomy with closed drain placement, 1345 (15%) were to gravity and 7887 (85%) were to suction. On multivariate and PSM, stratified by surgery-type, there was no difference in biochemical leak (Whipple, 4 vs. 4%; distal, 8 vs. 6%) or clinically relevant (CR)-POPF (Whipple, 13 vs. 15%; distal, 12 vs. 15%). On multivariate analysis, there was an increase in organ-space surgical site infections with suction drains for patients undergoing Whipple procedure (12 vs. 16%, p = 0.004), which did not persist on PSM (p = 0.088). Finally, there were no significant differences in amylase level, time to drain removal, or superficial surgical site infections for patients undergoing either procedure based on drain type. CONCLUSION: The majority of drains utilized after pancreatectomy in the USA are placed to suction, though a significant proportion are kept to gravity. Neither type of drain is associated with increased CR-POPF or other post-operative outcomes compared with the other; therefore, both types remain reasonable options if drains are to be placed.