Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243122, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33301539

RESUMO

The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to evaluate if trained dogs could discriminate between sweat samples from symptomatic COVID-19 positive individuals (SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive) and those from asymptomatic COVID-19 negative individuals. The study was conducted at 2 sites (Paris, France, and Beirut, Lebanon), followed the same training and testing protocols, and involved six detection dogs (three explosive detection dogs, one search and rescue dog, and two colon cancer detection dogs). A total of 177 individuals were recruited for the study (95 symptomatic COVID-19 positive and 82 asymptomatic COVID-19 negative individuals) from five hospitals, and one underarm sweat sample per individual was collected. The dog training sessions lasted between one and three weeks. Once trained, the dog had to mark the COVID-19 positive sample randomly placed behind one of three or four olfactory cones (the other cones contained at least one COVID-19 negative sample and between zero and two mocks). During the testing session, a COVID-19 positive sample could be used up to a maximum of three times for one dog. The dog and its handler were both blinded to the COVID-positive sample location. The success rate per dog (i.e., the number of correct indications divided by the number of trials) ranged from 76% to 100%. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the estimated success rate was most of the time higher than the success rate obtained by chance after removing the number of mocks from calculations. These results provide some evidence that detection dogs may be able to discriminate between sweat samples from symptomatic COVID-19 individuals and those from asymptomatic COVID-19 negative individuals. However, due to the limitations of this proof-of-concept study (including using some COVID-19 samples more than once and potential confounding biases), these results must be confirmed in validation studies.


Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Suor/virologia , Cães Trabalhadores , Animais , COVID-19/virologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Cães , Feminino , França , Humanos , Líbano , Masculino , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Olfato , Suor/química , Cães Trabalhadores/fisiologia
2.
Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ; 115: e200339, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1154865

RESUMO

We evaluated sweat, blood and urine specimens obtained from an ongoing cohort study in Brazil. Samples were collected at pre-established intervals after the initial rash presentation and tested for Zika virus (ZIKV) RNA presence by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). From 254 participants with confirmed infection, ZIKV RNA was detected in the sweat of 46 individuals (18.1%). Sweat presented a median cycle threshold (Ct) of 34.74 [interquartile range (IQR) 33.44-36.04], comparable to plasma (Ct 35.96 - IQR 33.29-36.69) and higher than urine (Ct 30.78 - IQR 28.72-33.22). Concomitant detection with other specimens was observed in 33 (72%) of 46 participants who had a positive result in sweat. These findings represent an unusual and not yet investigated virus shedding through eccrine glands.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Suor/virologia , RNA Viral/genética , Zika virus/isolamento & purificação , Infecção por Zika virus/diagnóstico , Urina/virologia , Sangue/virologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , RNA Viral/classificação , Estudos de Coortes , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Zika virus/genética , Infecção por Zika virus/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA