Perceived social support improves health-related quality of life in cochlear implant patients.

PURPOSE: Perceived social support has been shown to positively correlate with health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in a variety of conditions. This study investigated whether perceived social support is affecting HR-QoL of patients who receive a cochlear implant (CI) for deafness. METHODS: Eighty eight adults (56 males, 32 females; mean age: 60 years) with a uni- or bilateral CI for bilateral high-grade hearing loss were administered two questionnaires: a questionnaire for perceived social support (FSU-14) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) for hearing-specific HR-QoL. Administration of the questionnaires occurred at four points in time: before implantation and three, 12 and 24 months after implant activation. RESULTS: The CI patients had quite high levels of perceived social support (mean percentile rank: 71), which remained stable at all four measurement points. Multivariate Analysis showed a significant interaction between perceived social support and HR-QoL indicating that higher perceived social support lead to higher improvement of HR-QoL after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION: The CI patients in this study had higher than average levels of perceived social support, which did not change before and after cochlear implantation. Perceived social support and HR-QoL were related such that patients with high levels of perceived social support experienced greater improvement of their HR-QoL after cochlear implantation than patients with low levels of perceived social support. Based on this finding, perceived social support must be considered as an important factor for HR-QoL after cochlear implantation.

Differences in music appreciation between bilateral and single-sided cochlear implant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in music appreciation after cochlear implant (CI) surgery for patients with bilateral and single-sided deafness (SSD). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on all adult CI unilateral or bilateral recipients from November 2019 to March 2023. Musical questionnaire subset data from the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) - 35 Profile Instrument Score (maximum raw score of 15) was collected. Functional CI assessment was measured with CI-alone speech-in-quiet (SIQ) scores (AzBio and CNC). RESULTS: 22 adults underwent CI surgery for SSD and 21 adults for bilateral deafness (8 sequentially implanted). Every patient group had clinically significant improvements (p < 0.001) in mean SIQ scores in the most recently implanted ear (Azbio (% correct) SSD: 14.23 to 68.48, bilateral: 24.54 to 82.23, sequential: 6.25 to 82.57). SSD adults on average had higher music QOL scores at baseline (SSD: 11.05; bilateral: 7.86, p < 0.001). No group had significant increases in raw score at the first post-operative visit (SSD: 11.45, p = 0.86; bilateral: 8.15, p = 0.15). By the most recent post-implantation evaluation (median 12.8 months for SSD, 12.3 months for bilateral), SSD adults had a significant increase in raw score from baseline (11.05 to 12.45, p = 0.03), whereas bilaterally deafened (7.86 to 9.38, p = 0.12) adults had nonsignificant increases. CONCLUSIONS: SSD patients demonstrate higher baseline music appreciation than bilaterally deafened individuals regardless of unilateral or bilateral implantation and are more likely to demonstrate continued improvement in subjective music appreciation at last follow-up even when speech perception outcomes are similar.

Spanish translation and validation of the Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MuRQoL) in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the "Music-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire" into Spanish (sMuRQoL) and assess its convergent validity and discriminative capacity by comparing its scores with the outcomes of the musical perception test Meludia. METHODS: The sMuRQoL was completed by 129 patients: 55 cochlear implant (CI) users and 74 normal hearing (NH) individuals. Conducted in this study were an exploratory factor analysis, an evaluation of internal consistency, an assessment of score stability through test-retest reliability, a comparison of sMuRQoL scores between CI users and NH individuals and an examination of potential evidence of convergent validity and discriminative capacity of sMuRQoL in relation to other tools. This involved the comparison of the questionnaire scores with the Meludia outcomes. RESULTS: The sMuRQoL demonstrated a two-dimensional structure. All the dimensions displayed high internal consistency (α = 0.879-0.945) and score stability (ICC = 0.890-0.942). There were significant differences in the Frequency test between NH and CI users (d = 1.19-1.45). There's evidence of convergent validity between the scores of the Frequency test and the results of Meludia (r = 0.242-0.645). Additionally, the Frequency test demonstrate a good discriminative capacity to identify patients with poorer musical perception. CONCLUSIONS: The sMuRQoL is a reliable questionnaire, with adequate evidence of validity based on internal structure. This study provides an accessible, cost-effective, and quick-to-administer instrument in Spanish, optimizing available healthcare resources and bringing us closer to the patient needs.

Language, cognitive, and speech in noise perception abilities of children with cochlear implants: a comparative analysis by implantation period and bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the language, cognitive, and speech in noise (SiN) perception abilities of children with cochlear implants (CIs) to those of their peers with NH by grouping them according to their implantation period (12-18 months/19-24 months) and unilateral/bilateral CI use. METHODS: The sample comprised 50 children with cochlear implants (CIs) and 20 children with normal hearing (NH), ages 6-9 years. Children's language, cognitive, and speech in noise (SiN) perception skills were assessed. RESULTS: Children with CIs between 12 and 18 months and 19 and 24 months performed more poorly than children with NH on language, verbal memory (VM), verbal-short-term memory (V-STM), verbal working memory (V-WM), rapid naming, and speech in noise (SiN) perception abilities measures (p < 0.001). In addition, children with CIs between 19 and 24 months performed worse on rapid naming and V-WM tasks than children with CIs between 12 and 18 months (p < 0.017). Children with unilateral and bilateral CI performed more poorly than children with NH on language, VM, V-STM, V-WM, rapid naming, and SiN perception abilities assessments (p < 0.001). Additionally children with unilateral CI users performed poorly than children with bilateral CI users on SiN perception (p < 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: In children with congenital hearing loss (CHL), cochlear implantation between 12 and 18 months or sequential bilateral implantation is not sufficient for these children to perform like their NH peers in language, cognitive, and SiN perception abilities. In addition, intervention approaches should focus not only on increasing language skills, but also on cognitive abilities.

Third-party disability in cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: To date, auditory rehabilitation mainly focuses on the person with hearing impairment (PHI). This study aimed to analyse the burden of hearing loss on significant others (SOs), and to explore the impact of contextual and mediating psychosocial co-factors and auditory rehabilitation by cochlear implantation (CI). DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE: Third-party disability (SOS-HEAR) and quality of life (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire) were evaluated in 41 PHI scheduled for CI surgery and their close partners pre- and 6-month post-implantation. Further, age, hearing status, educational level, depressive symptoms (GDS-15), coping strategies (Brief-COPE), resilience (RS-13), stress (PSQ) of SOs and PHI were studied. RESULTS: Hearing loss imposes a burden on SOs, particularly in relation to changes in communication and socialisation. Third-party disability was higher in SOs of PHI with lower educational background (p = 0.04) and of advanced age (p = 0.008). Hearing status of SOs negatively correlated with SOS-HEAR (p = 0.04). After CI, quality of life of PHI and third-party disability of SOs improved (p < 0.001), except in relationship changes. SOs with higher pre-operative burden also experienced more third-party disability afterwards (p ≤ 0.003). CONCLUSION: Audiological rehabilitation should expand to include SOs in the rehabilitation process, as the burden experienced by SOs might persist even after CI.

Exposure to Spoken Communication in Children With Cochlear Implants During the COVID-19 Lockdown.

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdowns in Ontario, Canada in the spring of 2020 created unprecedented changes in the lives of all children, including children with hearing loss. Objective: To quantify how these lockdowns changed the spoken communication environments of children with cochlear implants by comparing the sounds they were exposed to before the Ontario provincial state of emergency in March 2020 and during the resulting closures of schools and nonessential businesses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This experimental cohort study comprised children with hearing loss who used cochlear implants to hear. These children were chosen because (1) their devices monitor and catalog levels and types of sounds during hourly use per day (datalogs), and (2) this group is particularly vulnerable to reduced sound exposure. Children were recruited from the Cochlear Implant Program at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Ontario, Canada. Children whose cochlear implant datalogs were captured between February 1 and March 16, 2020, shortly before lockdown (pre-COVID-19), were identified. Repeated measures were collected in 45 children during initial easing of lockdown restrictions (stages 1-2 of the provincial recovery plan); resulting datalogs encompassed the lockdown period (peri-COVID-19). Main Outcomes and Measures: Hours of sound captured by the Cochlear Nucleus datalogging system (Cochlear Corporation) in 6 categories of input levels (<40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, ≥80 A-weighted dB sound pressure levels [dBA]) and 6 auditory scene categories (quiet, speech, speech-in-noise, music, noise, and other). Mixed-model regression analyses revealed main effects with post hoc adjustment of confidence intervals using the Satterthwaite method. Results: A total of 45 children (mean [SD] age, 7.7 [5.0] years; 23 girls [51.1%]) participated in this cohort study. Results showed similar daily use of cochlear implants during the pre- and peri-COVID-19 periods (9.80 mean hours pre-COVID-19 and 9.34 mean hours peri-COVID-19). Despite consistent device use, these children experienced significant quieting of input sound levels peri-COVID-19 by 0.49 hour (95% CI, 0.21-0.80 hour) at 60 to 69 dBA and 1.70 hours (95% CI, 1.42-1.99 hours) at 70 to 79 dBA with clear reductions in speech exposure by 0.98 hour (95% CI, 0.49-1.47 hours). This outcome translated into a reduction of speech:quiet from 1.6:1.0 pre-COVID-19 to 0.9:1.0 during lockdowns. The greatest reductions in percentage of daily speech occurred in school-aged children (elementary, 12.32% [95% CI, 7.15%-17.49%]; middle school, 11.76% [95% CI, 5.00%-18.52%]; and high school, 9.60% [95% CI, 3.27%-15.93%]). Increased daily percentage of quiet (7.00% [95% CI, 4.27%-9.74%]) was most prevalent for children who had fewer numbers of people in their household (estimate [SE] = -1.12% [0.50%] per person; Cohen f = 0.31). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study indicate a clear association of COVID-19 lockdowns with a reduction in children's access to spoken communication.

Effects of a mind-body program on symptoms of depression and perceived stress among adults with neurofibromatosis type 2 who are deaf: A live-video randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a rare, progressive and incurable genetic disorder associated with progressive hearing loss and eventual deafness. As a group, patients with NF report high levels of stress and depressive symptoms. However, no studies have explored improvement in these symptoms after psychosocial interventions. We have previously shown that a mind-body program tailored to adults with NF2 who are deaf (the Relaxation Response and Resiliency Program for Deaf NF2, d3RP-NF2) improves quality of life and resiliency over and above a Health Enhancement program when both are delivered via live-video and assisted by Communication Access Realtime Translation (CART). Here we tested the effects of the programs on depression and perceived stress. METHODS: Forty-five patients with NF2 and significant hearing loss were randomized to the d3RP-NF2 or Health-Enhancement program and completed measures of depression (PHQ-9) and perceived stress (PSS-10) at baseline, post-intervention, and six-month follow-up. RESULTS: Patients randomized to the d3RP-NF2 program, but not to the control condition, experienced significant decreases on both measures from baseline to post-test, which were maintained at follow-up (within group tests). However, improvements following the d3RP-NF2 program was not significantly higher than those observed in the control group (between group tests). CONCLUSION: Results provide the first evidence of improvement in symptoms of depression and perceived stress among deaf patients living with NF2 who participate in a virtual mind-body program.

Technical Characteristics of Curriculum-Based Measurement With Students Who Are Deaf.

This study compared the reliability and validity of student scores from paper-pencil and e-based assessments using the "maze" and "silent reading fluency" (SRF) tasks. Forty students who were deaf and hard of hearing and reading between the second and fifth grade reading levels and their teachers (n = 21) participated. For maze, alternate form reliability coefficients obtained from correct scores and correct scores adjusted for guessing ranged from r = .61 to .84 (ps < .01); criterion-related validity coefficients ranged from r = .33 to .67 (most ps < .01). For SRF, reliability coefficients obtained from correct scores ranged from r = .50 to .75 (ps < .01); validity ranged from r = .25 to .72. Differences between student performance on paper-pencil and e-based conditions were generally non-significant for maze; significant differences between conditions for SRF favored the paper-pencil condition. Findings suggest that maze holds promise, with inconclusive results for SRF.

The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of fixed and adaptive microphone directionality on speech reception threshold (SRT) in noise when compared to omnidirectional mode in unilateral cochlear-implant (CI) use for three different CI systems.Methods: Twenty-four CI recipients with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss participated in the study. Eight recipients of each CI system were enrolled, and their SRT in noise was measured when the speech and noise signals were co-located in the front to serve as a baseline. The acute effect of different microphone directionalities on SRT in noise was measured with the noise emanating at 90° in the horizontal plane from the side of the CI sound processor (S0NCI).Results: When compared to the baseline condition, the individual data revealed fairly similar patterns within each CI system. In the S0NCI condition, the average improvement in SRT in noise for fixed and adaptive directionalities over the omnidirectional mode was statistically significant and ranged from 1.2 to 6.0 dB SNR and from 3.7 to 12.7 dB SNR depending on the CI system, respectively.Discussion: Directional microphones significantly improve SRT in noise for all three CI systems. However, relatively large differences were observed in the directional microphone efficacy between CI systems.

Influence of the pre- or postlingual status of cochlear implant recipients on behavioural T/C-levels.

INTRODUCTION: Previous auditory experience modifies the sensitivity of the auditory cortex to the afferent activity of the auditory pathways and may influence the threshold (T) and comfort (C) levels in patients receiving a cochlear implant (CI). Literature data on this particular topic is very scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the differences in T/C-levels between pre- and postlingually implanted cochlear implant patients. METHODS: Retrospective case review in a quaternary otologic referral centre was performed. Data on the T/C-levels have been collected in 90 consecutive CI patients divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 16 prelingually deaf children implanted between 8 months and 10 years of age. Group 2 comprised 74 postlingually deaf adults (average age of 62 years). All patients were users of the Nucleus 24RECA (Freedom, Contour Advance-of-Stylet electrode) cochlear implant. All measurements were performed at the fifth implant programming session at 4-6 months after surgery, when stable T/C thresholds have already been obtained. RESULTS: The behavioural C-levels present important and statistically significant differences between the pre- and postlingually implanted patients for all electrode contacts that could reach 30 CL. For the T-levels the observed differences were smaller and statistically insignificant for most electrode contacts. CONCLUSIONS: The previous auditory experience (pre- or postlingual deafness) seems to be an independent parameter influencing the T/C-levels in patients receiving a CI. Together with the electrode contact impedance and the contact position in the electrode array it can explain up to 37% of the variability in the definition of the C-levels. The fact that the stabilised C-levels measured 4-6 months postoperatively can be up to 30 CL higher in the prelingually deaf patients than in the postlingual ones results also in a much higher dynamic range observed in prelingual subjects. Therefore implant programming of the prelingual patients should be very cautious in order to avoid the risk of overstimulation.

Mothers' emotional experiences related to their child's diagnosis of deafness and cochlear implant surgery: Parenting stress and child's language development.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to assess the emotional experiences, specifically parenting stress, of mothers of children with cochlear implants (CIs), and their children's language development before surgery and at three and six months after CI activation. METHODS: Twenty mothers of children with CIs were interviewed before their children's surgery about their experiences in connection with the diagnosis of deafness, the surgery and the activation of the CI. The Parenting Stress Index questionnaire and the MacArthur-Bates-Communication Development Inventory were administered before the surgery and at 3 and 6 months after the CI activation. RESULTS: Analysis of the qualitative data resulting from the interviews showed that the mothers' emotional experiences before the CI surgery were complex. Mothers reported both positive and negative emotions related to deafness, diagnosis and surgery, benefits of the CI, coping strategies and future expectations. The mothers of children with more advanced lexical production six months after CI activation displayed a high frequency of themes related to positive emotions, thoughts and coping strategies before the surgery. Distress on the part of the mothers, perceptions of difficulties in their child and instances of parent-child dysfunctional interaction were negatively and significantly related to the child's language and communication development. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the importance of assessing the mother's emotional experience in relation to diagnosis and CI activation before the surgery. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE ARE DISCUSSED: specifically, the importance of the support offered to the parents, aimed at enhancing both their awareness of their expectations about their child's rehabilitation process and their self-efficacy in supporting the child's adaptation to the use of the CI.

Prostate-Specimen Antigen (PSA) Screening and Shared Decision Making Among Deaf and Hearing Male Patients.

Some deaf men who use American Sign Language (ASL) experience barriers in patient-physician communication which may leave them at disparity for shared decision making compared to hearing men. Transparent communication accessibility is needed between deaf male ASL users and their physicians to maximize the benefit to risk ratio of using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening tool for early detection. The objective is to compare shared decision-making outcomes between deaf and hearing males who are (1) age-eligible for PSA screening and (2) younger than 45 years old with a family history of cancer. An accessible health survey including questions about PSA test, PCC, modes of communication, and cancer history was administered in ASL to a nationwide sample of deaf adults from February 2017 to April 2018. Two subsamples were created: (1) 45- to 69-year-old men who were age-eligible for PSA testing and (2) 18- to 44-year-old men with a family history of cancer. Age-eligible and younger deaf men with a family history of cancer are at disparity for shared decision making compared to their hearing peers. Regardless of age and PSA testing status, deaf men felt significantly less engaged in shared decision making with their health care providers compared to hearing men. Participation in shared decision making requires not only accessible communication but also cultural competency in working with deaf patients. This is critical in the shared decision-making era in maximizing the benefit of prostate cancer screening in deaf male patient population.

Mães ouvintes e filhos surdos: uma visão psicanalítica sobre relações afetivas na primeira infância que transcendem as diferenças / Hearing mothers and deaf children: a psychoanalytic view of affective relationships in early childhood which transcend differences / Madres oyentes e hijos sordos: una visión psicoanalítica sobre las relaciones afectivas en la primera infancia que trasciende las diferencias

É por meio da linguagem que pensamos e expressamos nossos sentimentos e nos comunicamos com o mundo. Assim, cientes da importância das interações e relações interpessoais entre os sujeitos surdos e suas famílias, nosso estudo tem como objetivo pesquisar sobre a comunicação afetiva entre a mãe ouvinte e o filho surdo, focando, principalmente, nas dificuldades de aceitar a surdez do filho e de que forma essa resistência interfere no interesse pela aprendizagem da língua de sinais como meio de comunicação. Essas investigações foram elucidadas pelas experiências vivenciadas pela protagonista do filme "Sou surda e não sabia". Acreditamos que esta pesquisa possa trazer espaços de reflexão sobre a importância da aquisição da língua de sinais para filhos surdos e seus pais, uma vez que a comunicação entre estes é fundamental para o seu desenvolvimento físico e psíquico, bem como primordial para se alcançar uma interação desses surdos com o mundo, o qual se relaciona por meio da linguagem oral. A utilização de um filme como objeto de estudo nos permitiu trazer reflexões sobre a realidade a partir da história narrada.

It is through language that we think and express our feelings and communicate with the world. Thus, aware of the importance of interactions and interpersonal relationships between deaf people and their families, our study aims to research the affective communication between listener mother and deaf child, focusing mainly on the difficulties of accepting the deafness of the child and how this resistance interfered with interest in sign language learning as a means of communication. These investigations were elucidated by the experiences lived out by the protagonist of the film "I am deaf and did not know." We believe that this research can lead to reflection and discussion on the importance of sign language acquisition for deaf children and their parents, as communication is crucial for their physical and mental development as well as central to achieving an interaction of these deaf people with the world, which is reported through oral language. The use of a film as an object of study allowed us to reflect about this reality, from the story told.

Es por medio del lenguaje que pensamos y expresamos nuestros sentimientos y nos comunicamos con el mundo. Así, sabiendo de la importancia de las interacciones y relaciones interpersonales, entre las personas sordas y sus familias, nuestro estudio tiene como objetivo investigar sobre la comunicación afectiva entre madre oyente y el hijo sordo, enfocándose principalmente en las dificultades de aceptar la sordera del hijo y, de qué forma esa resistencia interfirió en el interés por el aprendizaje de la lengua de señas, como medio de comunicación. Estas investigaciones fueron elucidadas por las experiencias vivenciadas por la protagonista del filme "Soy sorda y no sabía". Creemos que esta investigación puede traer espacios de reflexiones sobre la importancia de la adquisición de la lengua de señas para hijos sordos y sus padres, una vez que la comunicación de éstos es fundamental para su desarrollo físico y psíquico, así como primordial para alcanzar una interacción con el mundo, el cual se relaciona por medio del lenguaje oral. La utilización de una película como objeto de estudio nos permitió traer reflexiones sobre la realidad, a partir de la historia narrada.

Benefits of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral Naída CI cochlear implant recipients.

PURPOSE: Many bilaterally deaf adults are only able to receive one cochlear implant (CI), resulting in suboptimal listening performance, especially in challenging listening environments. Adding a contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device to a unilateral CI is one possibility to alleviate these challenges. This study examined the benefit of such a CROS device. METHODS: Thirteen adult subjects with at least 6 months of CI use, and no or limited benefit of a hearing instrument in the contralateral ear were included in the study. The perceived benefit of a CROS device in everyday listening environments was evaluated up to 1 year after initial fitting using several questionnaires. Speech intelligibility performance was determined using the French matrix sentence test in quiet and in two speech-in-noise setups and was followed for 3 months after CROS fitting. RESULTS: Subjects indicated high satisfaction with the practical usability of the CROS device and long-term device retention was high. Perceived benefits in everyday listening environments were reported. Formal speech intelligibility tests revealed statistically significant median improvements of 6.93 dB SPL (Wilcoxon Z = 2.380, p = 0.017) in quiet and up to 8.00 dB SNR (Wilcoxon Z = 2.366, p = 0.018) in noise. These benefits were accessible immediately without a need for prolonged acclimatization. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective satisfaction and device retention as well as speech intelligibility benefits in quiet and in noise prove the CROS device to be a valuable addition to a unilateral CI in cases of bilateral deafness where bilateral implantation is not an option.

Ansiedade entre as pessoas surdas: um estudo teórico / Anxiety among deaf people: a theoretical study / Ansiedad entre las personas sordas: un estudio teórico

O objetivo deste estudo teórico foi discutir a influência da comunicação, do gênero, do nível educacional e das características da surdez sobre a ansiedade das pessoas surdas. Comunicação e características da surdez são constantes desencadeadores de ansiedade entre as pessoas surdas, pois são praticamente inerentes à surdez, o que requer estratégias comunicacionais eficazes e maior habilidade linguística para lidar com seus efeitos ansiogênicos. O nível educacional e o gênero são fortalecedores do desenvolvimento da ansiedade, porém, advêm de contextos externos ligados ao modelo de cuidado e aos valores recebidos na família e fora dela e à possibilidade de desenvolvimento educacional. Apesar de comum a todas as pessoas, a ansiedade apresenta desencadeadores específicos para as pessoas surdas, o que requer da família um maior suporte social e emocional, além do engajamento de profissionais e pesquisadores na busca por meios que protejam ou facilitem a vida das pessoas surdas contra a ansiedade

The purpose of this theoretical study was to show and discuss the influence of communication, gender, educational level and deafness characteristics on deaf people anxiety. Communication and deafness characteristics are constant anxiety triggers among deaf people, because are practically inherent to deafness, requiring effective communication strategies and greater linguistic ability to deal with their anxiogenic effects. Educational level and gender are empowered by the development of the anxiety, however, they derive from external contexts linked to the model of care and the values received in the family and outside of it and to the possibility of educational development. Although common to all people, anxiety presents specific triggers for deaf people, which requires a greater social and emotional support from the family, as well as the engagement of professionals and researchers in the search for ways that protect or facilitate the lives of deaf people against anxiety

El objetivo de este estudio teórico fue presentar y discutir la influencia de la comunicación, del género, del nivel educacional y de las características de la sordera sobre la ansiedad de las personas sordas. Comunicación y características de la sordera son constantes desencadenantes de ansiedad entre las personas sordas, pues son prácticamente inherentes a la sordera, lo que requiere estrategias de comunicación eficaces y una mayor habilidad lingüística para lidiar con sus efectos ansiogénicos. El nivel educativo y el género son fortalecedores del desarrollo de la ansiedad, pero provienen de contextos externos ligados al modelo de cuidado y a los valores recibidos en la familia y fuera de ella y a la posibilidad de desarrollo educativo. A pesar de común a todas las personas, la ansiedad presenta desencadenadores específicos para las personas sordas, lo que requiere de la familia un mayor soporte social y emocional, además del compromiso de profesionales e investigadores en la búsqueda de medios que protejan o faciliten la vida de las personas sordas contra la ansiedad

Evaluation of quality of life in patients after cochlear implantation surgery in 2014-2017.

INTRODUCTION: Profound hearing loss significantly affects the quality of life of deaf people as well as their families. Observation of the benefit from the use of cochlear implants in deaf patients allows to assess the success of treatment with this method and its impact on the quality of life of these patients. The aim of this study was to determine the quality of life in patient after the cochlear implantation in the material of Department of Phoniatrics and Audiology of the Medical University in Poznan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved implanted patients who voluntarily joined to the project entitled "Observational study of the implanted patient (Cochlear-IROS)". It has a prospective character, it is an international and long-term study, covering the observation of patients up to three years after implantation. Standardized HUI and SSQ questionnaires were used. 70 patients were included in the analysis, the mean age at the time of the cochlear implantation was 47.6 years. In the research group there were 33 men and 37 women. In the whole group, the patients' age at implantation was at least 18 years, max. 80 years. RESULTS: The results of the SSQ questionnaire, which deals with the self-assessment of hearing ability in everyday situations, indicate that in the subjective assessment of patients one year after surgery the speech hearing improved by 77%, spatial hearing by 84%, and the quality of hearing by 49%. The general quality of life before the first connection of the sound processor according to the HUI questionnaire, the patients rated at 0.49 (0-1 scale, where 0 - corresponds to the death condition and 1 - full health). After one year from the implantation, this rating increased to 0.56. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of the cochlear implant significantly increases the patient's quality of life, its physical and emotional functioning. Statistically significant better self-assessment of patients mainly concerned hearing speech and spatial hearing - especially after 1 year of connecting the speech processor.

The first deaf-blind patient in Russia with Argus II retinal prosthesis system: what he sees and why.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we propose a new method for evaluating the functional results based on the sizes of phosphenes that the patient drew which were then digitalized. We also describe the methodology of psychological testing and support for a deaf-blind patient. APPROACH: A 59-year-old man with retinitis pigmentosa and hearing loss (clinical Usher syndrome) underwent surgery to implant the Argus II retinal prosthesis system in his right eye. MAIN RESULTS: Correlation analysis showed a weak dependency between the size of a phosphene and the perceptual threshold. Significant correlations between a phosphene and the height of the interface, impedance or retinal thickness was not found. The patient with the retinal prosthesis felt more independent and confident, and more healthy. This is the first case of retinal implant surgery in Russia. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study add to the understanding in the field of retinal implants functioning. The experience of the successful rehabilitation of the deaf-blind patient after implantation of Argus II allowed us to design a methodology that can be used in future similar cases.

A questionnaire-based analysis of parental perspectives on pediatric cochlear implant (CI) re/habilitation services: a pilot study from a developing CI service in India.

OBJECTIVE: To study parental perspectives on re/habilitation services offered for pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users at a non-profit organization in India. METHODOLOGY: A non-standardized questionnaire comprising 46 items was created to understand perspectives of parents of pediatric CI users. Questions were designed to examine re/habilitation services from the angles of service delivery, parental stress levels, reasons for delay in obtaining services, sources of emotional support, concerns, and fears during each stage starting from diagnosis of hearing loss to CI surgery, re/habilitation services and parents' views of their children post-CI. The questionnaire was posed to 30 parents and responses were recorded and coded. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Qualitative and quantitative analyses based on parents' responses identified several factors that significantly influenced parental perspectives during each stage. The major factors delaying the decision to go for CI included a fear of surgery, lack of funds for CI and the subsequent re/habilitation process, and limited knowledge. Key concerns were the child's academic performance and social acceptance. Familial support played an important role during each stage. A significant reduction in the parental stress levels was observed following CI surgery. Parents indicated that local support for therapy, financial assistance and better guidance at each stage would substantially help in lowering stress levels. CONCLUSIONS: The parental perspectives analyzed in this study can be utilized towards improving the quality of service delivery in terms of parental satisfaction and outcomes post-CI. Efforts should be taken to improve parental awareness, funding options, and access to re/habilitation services and social networks connecting similar parents.

Effects of family environment features on cochlear-implanted children.

PURPOSE: The role of cochlear implant in deaf children development is well-known. However, the results are highly variable and depend on several factors. The most important role belongs to the family, family environment in which the child develops. The aim of the study was to evaluate the features of the family environment in which cochlear-implanted children develop. METHODS: The questionnaire "Family Environment Scale" was sent to 108 families who had cochlear-implanted child with more than 6 months of experience. One of the parents was asked to fill out the questionnaire which also included general information about the child and the family. RESULTS: A total of 58 families responded to the questionnaire and accepted to participate in the study. Mean values were higher compared with normal families in the areas of cohesion, expressiveness, intellectual-cultural orientation and organization, but the cohesion and organization score mean value exceeded the normal values (between 40 and 60). The independence and the conflict areas had lower values than normal families but did not exceed the lower limit of normal (40). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between the family and the auditory-verbal development potential of the cochlear-implanted child is obvious. However, further studies are needed to establish correlations between the characteristics of the family environment and the level of auditory-verbal and psycho-cognitive development of the cochlear-implanted child so we can act on the family environment through education or therapy, to get maximum benefit with these children.

A Breast Cancer Education Program for D/deaf Women.

Barriers to obtaining breast cancer prevention knowledge and breast cancer screening have been noted among D/deaf women. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is described that tested a culturally and linguistically tailored breast cancer education program conducted among a racially/ethnically diverse sample of 209 D/deaf women age 40 years or older. The study focused on D/deaf women with no more than a secondary education, a population at relatively high risk for incomplete breast health knowledge and services. This population's inadequate breast cancer knowledge and screening practices and the value of the education program were confirmed. Knowledge increased from -baseline to 12-month follow-up in the intervention group, and in some instances the control group; increased intention to get a mammogram was observed in the intervention group. Possible reasons for the few significant intervention/control group differences at 12 months were examined. Materials from the RCT are available online.