Pathway for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: impact on patient confidence and satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Between 8 and 87% of prostatectomies result in urinary incontinence, with around half of patients using incontinence pads daily at 6 months. Specialist urology continence nurses at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals (NNUH) NHS Foundation Trust created a pre- and post-surgical care pathway formalising support for these patients, which involves the provision of TENA Men (Essity) male incontinence pads. AIMS: This audit aimed to assess patient satisfaction with this pathway and TENA Men pads. METHODS: Patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy at NNUH between 27 April and 9 November 2021 and who required continence pads were invited to fill out an online anonymous mixed-method (mainly qualitative) survey. RESULTS: Of 28 respondents, 71% reported incontinence after their surgical catheter was removed. Most (89%) were satisfied with the preoperative advice. Of 19 respondents to questions on confidence and satisfaction, 16 were confident that the pads they had been prescribed were helping them to manage urinary leakage, and 16 were confident or very confident that they could manage their incontinence themselves. Generally, respondents were confident that their overall and mental health had improved, and most were confident or very confident that they had less anxiety. However, less than a quarter of respondents were 'very confident' about going out, meeting people or exercising. All but one respondent found TENA Men pads easy to fit, and the most used words in the free-text explanations of what they most liked, included 'easy', 'discreet', 'comfortable' and 'unobtrusive'. CONCLUSION: The clinical pathway helped give patients undergoing radical prostatectomy confidence in their ability to manage post-surgery incontinence themselves and could be of value in other hospitals. Easy access to incontinence pads designed for the male anatomy has an important part in this.

Pathway for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: impact on patient confidence and satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Between 8% and 87% of prostatectomies result in urinary incontinence, with around half of patients using incontinence pads daily at 6 months. Specialist urology continence nurses at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust created a pre- and post-surgical care pathway formalising support for these patients, which involves the provision of TENA Men (Essity) male incontinence pads. AIMS: This audit aimed to assess patient satisfaction with this pathway and TENA Men pads. METHODS: Patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy at NNUH between 27 April and 9 November 2021 and who required continence pads were invited to fill out an online anonymous mixed-method (mainly qualitative) survey. RESULTS: Of 28 respondents, 71% reported incontinence after their surgical catheter was removed. Most (89%) were satisfied with the preoperative advice. Of 19 respondents to questions on confidence and satisfaction, 16 were confident that the pads they had been prescribed were helping them to manage urinary leakage, and 16 were confident or very confident that they could manage their incontinence themselves. Generally, respondents were confident that their overall and mental health had improved, and most were confident or very confident that they had less anxiety. However, less than a quarter of respondents were 'very confident' about going out, meeting people or exercising. All but one respondent found TENA Men pads easy to fit, and the most used words in the free-text explanations of what they most included 'easy', 'discreet', 'comfortable' and 'unobtrusive'. CONCLUSION: The clinical pathway helped give patients undergoing radical prostatectomy confidence in their ability to manage post-surgery incontinence themselves and could be of value in other hospitals. Easy access to incontinence pads designed for the male anatomy has an important part in this.

Difference in Incontinence Pad Use between Patients after Radical Prostatectomy and Cancer-Free Population with Subgroup Analysis for Open vs. Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A Descriptive Analysis of Insurance Claims-Based Data.

PURPOSE: to quantify and compare pre- and post-surgical incontinence pad use between men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) and cancer-free controls, using population-based Austrian insurance claims data. METHODS: Men who underwent RP for treating PCa between 2013-2015 were identified. Cancer-free men ≥45 years with and without benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) were used as controls. Longitudinal data on ICD-diagnoses, type of surgery, prescribed incontinence pads, and hospitals' surgery volumes were aggregated between 2011-2018 to capture pre- and up to three years post-RP follow-up. Monthly rates of pad use were calculated and compared between RP types and cancer-free controls. RESULTS: A total of 6248 RP patients, 7158 cancer-free men with BPH, and 50,257 cancer-free men without BPH were analyzed. Comparing to pre-RP (0.03, 95%CI: 0.02-0.05), RP resulted in significantly higher rates of prescribed pads (at 3 months: 12.61, 95%CI: 11.59-13.65; 12 months: 6.71, 95%CI: 6.10-7.34; 36 months: 4.91, 95%CI: 3.76-4.62). These rates were also higher than those for cancer free controls (with BPH:0.06, 95%CI: 0.04-0.09; without BPH:0.12, 95%CI: 0.10-0.14). The rate of prescribed pads after surgery continued to decline over time and remained higher among men who underwent minimally invasive RP compared to those who underwent an open procedure. CONCLUSION: Despite progress in surgical techniques, post-RP incontinence remains a prevalent adverse event. The rate of pad usage steadily improved over the first three years post RP. The rate of patients with incontinence needing pads was higher among those who were treated minimally invasive compared to open approach.

Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series.

PURPOSE: Salvage radical prostatectomy is rare due to the risk of postoperative complications. We compare salvage Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (SRS-RARP) with salvage standard robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (SS-RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 patients across 9 centers were identified (40 SRS-RARP vs 32 SS-RARP). Demographics, perioperative data, and pathological and functional outcomes were compared using Student's t-test and ANOVA. Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to assess risk of incontinence and time to continence. Linear regression models were constructed to investigate postoperative pad use and console time. RESULTS: Median followup was 23 vs 36 months for SRS-RARP vs SS-RARP. Console time and estimated blood loss favored SRS-RARP. There were no differences in complication rates or oncologic outcomes. SRS-RARP had improved continence (78.4% vs 43.8%, p <0.001 for 0-1 pad, 54.1% vs 6.3%, p <0.001 for 0 pad), lower pads per day (0.57 vs 2.03, p <0.001), and earlier return to continence (median 47 vs 180 days, p=0.008). SRS-RARP was associated with decreased incontinence defined as >0-1 pad (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.79, p=0.016), although not when defined as >0 pad (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-1.01, p=0.053). On adjusted analysis SRS-RARP was associated with decreased pads per day. Lymph node dissection and primary treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy were associated with longer console time. CONCLUSIONS: SRS-RARP is a feasible salvage option with significantly improved urinary function outcomes. This may warrant increased utilization of SRS-RARP to manage men who fail nonsurgical primary treatment for prostate cancer.

Preliminary Report From the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium: Large-Scale Data Collection Through Quality Improvement Initiatives to Provide Data on Functional Outcomes After Rectal Prolapse Repair.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of rectal prolapse is constantly evolving, yet numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses studying operative approaches have failed to make meaningful conclusions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report on preliminary data captured during a large-scale quality improvement initiative to measure and improve function in patients undergoing rectal prolapse repair. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected surgical quality improvement data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 14 tertiary centers specializing in pelvic floor disorders from 2017 to 2019. PATIENTS: A total of 181 consecutive patients undergoing external rectal prolapse repair were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and 3-month postoperative Wexner incontinence score and Altomare obstructed defecation score were measured. RESULTS: The cohort included 112 patients undergoing abdominal surgery (71 suture rectopexy/56% minimally invasive, 41 ventral rectopexy/93% minimally invasive). Those offered perineal approaches (n = 68) were older (median age, 75 vs 62 y; p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (ASA 3-4: 51% vs 24%; p < 0.01) but also reported higher preintervention rates of fecal incontinence (Wexner 11.4 ± 6.4 vs 8.6 ± 5.8; p < 0.01). Patients undergoing perineal procedures had similar incremental improvements in function after surgery as patients undergoing abdominal repair (change in Wexner, -2.6 ± 6.4 vs -3.1 ± 5.6, p = 0.6; change in Altomare, -2.9 ± 4.6 vs -2.7 ± 4.9, p = 0.8). Similarly, patients undergoing posterior suture rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy had similar incremental improvements in overall scores; however, patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy had a higher decrease in the need to use pads after surgery. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective data analysis and 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes improved in all of the patients undergoing prolapse surgery. Larger cohorts are necessary to show superiority among surgical procedures. Quality improvement methods may allow for systematic yet practical acquisition of information and data analysis. We call for the creation of a robust database to benefit this patient population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B581. REPORTE PRELIMINAR DEL CONSORCIO DE TRASTORNOS DEL PISO PLVICO RECOLECCIN DE DATOS A GRAN ESCALA MEDIANTE INICIATIVAS DE MEJORAMIENTO DE LA CALIDAD PARA PROPORCIONAR INFORMACIN SOBRE LOS RESULTADOS FUNCIONALES: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal está evolucionando constantemente, sin embargo, numerosos estudios clínicos y metaanálisis que evalúan los tratamientos quirúrgicos no han logrado demostrar conclusiones significativas.OBJETIVO:Reportar datos preliminares obtenidos a gran escala durante una iniciativa de mejoramiento de la calidad para medir y mejorar la función en pacientes sometidos a reparación de prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de datos recolectados prospectivamente de mejoramiento de la calidad quirúrgica.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en 14 centros terciarios especializados en trastornos del piso pélvico del 2017 al 2019.PACIENTES:Un total de 181 pacientes consecutivos sometidos a reparación de prolapso rectal externo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Escala de incontinencia de Wexner y de defecación obstruida de Altomare preoperatoria y tres meses postoperatoria.RESULTADOS:El cohorte incluyó 112 pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal (71 rectopexia con sutura / 56% minimally invasive, 41 rectopexia ventral / 93% minimally invasive). Aquellos a los que se les realizaron abordajes perineales (n = 68) eran mayores (edad media de 75 vs. 62, p <0,01) y tenían mayorcomorbilidades (ASA 3-4: 51% vs. 24%, p <0,01), además reportaron una mayor tasa de incontinencia fecal previo a la intervención (Wexner 11,4 ± 6,4 vs. 8,6 +/- 5,8, p <0,01). Posterior a la cirugía, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos perineales tuvieron mejoría progresiva en la función similar que los pacientes sometidos a reparación abdominal (cambio en Wexner -2,6 ± 6,4 vs. -3,1 ± 5,6, p = 0,6; cambio en Altomare -2,9 ± 4,6 vs. -2,7 ± 4,9, p = 0,8). De manera similar, los pacientes con rectopexia posterior con sutura y rectopexia ventral con malla tuvieron mejoría progresiva similares en las escalas generales; no obstante, pacientes con rectopexia ventral con malla tuvieron una mayor disminución en la necesidad de usar paños protectores después de la cirugía.LIMITACIONES:Análisis de datos retrospectivo y seguimiento de tres meses.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados funcionales mejoraron en todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de prolapso. Se necesitan cohortes más grandes para demostrar superioridad entre los procedimientos quirúrgicos. Métodos de mejoramiento de la calidad pueden permitir la adquisición sistemática, pero práctica de información y análisis de datos. Hacemos un llamado para la creación de una base de datos sólida para beneficiar a esta población de pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B581. (Traducción- Dr Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Escala de avaliação do uso de fraldas e absorventes: estudo metodológico / Evaluation scale for the use of adult diapers and absorbent products': methodological study / Escala de evaluación del uso de pañales y absorbentes: estudio metodológico

OBJETIVO: Validar o conteúdo da escala de avaliação do uso de fraldas e produtos absorventes (Escala AUFA) por idosos na atenção primária. MÉTODO: Estudo metodológico de validação de conteúdo com 23 especialistas em enfermagem gerontológica ou feridas pela avaliação do nome e itens da escala. A análise dos dados ocorreu por meio de índice de validação de conteúdo (IVC) e coeficiente de validação de conteúdo (CVC), percentual de concordo totalmente e concordância pelo Alfa de Cronbach, com o mínimo de 0,80 cada. RESULTADOS: Os IVC e CVC gerais foram de, respectivamente, 0,91 e 0,89. Entretanto, os percentuais de concordo completamente e Alfa de Cronbach foram de, respectivamente, 0,65 e 0,51. Após três envios e modificações da escala, a avaliação foi de 0,95 e 0,85. DISCUSSÃO: Os juízes contribuíram para o conteúdo da escala, principalmente quanto ao número de trocas CONCLUSÃO: Após as análises e sugestões dos juízes, o conteúdo foi refinado e validado.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the content of the 'Evaluation Scale for the Use of Adult Diapers and Absorbent Products' (AUFA Scale) among elderly patients in primary care. METHOD: Methodological study for validation of contente with 23 specialists in gerontological nursing and/or wounds for evaluating the name and the items of the scale. The analysis of the data was done according to the Index of Validation of Content (IVC) and the Coefficient of Validation of Content (CVC), the 'Fully Agree" percentage and the compliance to 'Cronbach's Alpha', with a minimum score of 0,80 for each. RESULTS: The general IVC and CVC were 0,91 and 0,89, respectively. However, the 'Fully Agree' and 'Cronbach's Alpha' percentages were 0,65 and 0,51, respectively. After three 3 submissions and modifications of the scale, the scores changed to 0,95 and 0,85. DISCUSSION: Judges contributed to the content of the scale, especially regarding the number of absorbent product changes CONCLUSION: After taking into account the analyses and suggetions made by the judges, the content was refined and considered validated.

OBJETIVO: Validar el contenido de la escala de evaluación para el uso de pañales y productos absorbentes (Escala AUFA) en ancianos en atención primaria. MÉTODO: Estudio metodológico de validación de contenido con 23 especialistas en enfermería gerontológica y/o heridas para la evaluación del nombre y de los ítems de la escala. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante el Índice de Validación de Contenido (IVC) y el Coeficiente de Validación de Contenido (CVC), así como del porcentaje de la respuesta 'Totalmente de acuerdo' y del 'Alfa de Cronbach', con un puntaje mínimo de 0.80 para cada uno.RESULTADOS: Los IVC y CVC generales fueron de 0.91 y 0.89, respectivamente. Sin embargo, el porcentaje de 'Totalmente de acuerdo' y del 'Alfa de Cronbach' fue de 0.65 y 0.51, respectivamente. Después de 3 presentaciones y modificaciones de la escala, la evaluación fue de 0.95 y 0.85. DISCUSIÓN: Los jueces contribuyeron al contenido de la escala, principalmente en cuanto al número de cambios. CONCLUSIÓN: Luego del análisis y de las sugerencias de los jueces, el contenido se refino el contenido hasta considerarlo validado.

Male stress urinary incontinence is often underreported.

INTRODUCTION Patient-reported pads per day use is a widely used metric in grading the severity of stress urinary incontinence and guiding surgical decision-making, particularly in mild-to-moderate cases. We sought to compare patient-reported stress urinary incontinence severity by pads per day with objective findings on standing cough test. We hypothesize that patient-reported pads per day often underestimates stress urinary incontinence severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our male stress urinary incontinence surgical database and identified 299 patients with self-reported mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence who were evaluated with standing cough test prior to surgical intervention between 2007 and 2019. Patients were evaluated with the Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale for urinary leakage during a standing cough test. This test has been shown to reliably and accurately predict surgical success. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify parameters associated with stress urinary incontinence upgrading in a multivariable model. RESULTS: Among 299 patients with reported mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence, 101 (34%) were upgraded to severe stress urinary incontinence by standing cough test. Prior stress urinary incontinence surgery (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.0-8.0, p < 0.0001) and radiation (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.7-5.7, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with Male Stress Incontinence Grading Scale upgrading in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Roughly one-third of men who report mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence actually have severe incontinence observed on physical examination. All men being evaluated for stress urinary incontinence should undergo standing cough test to accurately grade incontinence severity and guide surgical management.

Functional Outcome and Complications following Ileal Neobladder Reconstruction in Male Patients without Tumor Recurrence. More than 35 Years of Experience from a Single Center.

PURPOSE: There is a lack of data on true long-term functional outcome of orthotopic bladder substitution. The primary study objective was to report our 35-year clinical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since October 1985, 259 male patients from a large single center radical cystectomy series with complete followup of more than 60 months (median 121, range 60-267) without recurrence, irradiation or undiversion that might have affected the functional outcome, were included. RESULTS: Median age at radical cystectomy and at survey was 63 (range 23-81) and 75 (range 43-92) years, respectively. Overall 87% of patients voided spontaneously and residual-free. This rate decreased with increasing age at the time of surgery (less than 50 years old 94%, 70 years old or older 82%). Overall day/nighttime continence rates were 90%/82%. These rates decreased with increasing age at the time of surgery from 100%/88% to 87%/80%. The overall pad-free rate was 71%/47%. Bicarbonate use decreased from 51% (5 years) to 19% (25 years). Patients with a followup of more than 20 years had the lowest rate of residual urine and clean intermittent catheterization (0.0%) as well as use of more than 1 pad at daytime/nighttime (6.3%/12.5%) and mucus obstruction (0.0%). Serum creatinine showed only the age related increase. The surgical complication rate was 27% and correlated inversely with functional results (chi-squared 11.227, p <0.005), even when the younger age at the time of surgery (younger than 60 years) was related to higher rates of surgical complications (chi-squared 6.80, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ileal neobladder represents an excellent long-term option for urinary diversion with an acceptable complication rate.

Development and randomised controlled trial of a Continence Product Patient Decision Aid for men postradical prostatectomy.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate an evidence-based Continence Product Patient Decision Aid (CP-PDA) to reduce decisional conflict and support continence product choice for men postradical prostatectomy. BACKGROUND: In 2018, 1.3 million men globally were diagnosed with prostate cancer. A common treatment is radical prostatectomy, usually leading to sudden onset of urinary incontinence. For people experiencing incontinence, products to contain leakage are fundamental to health-related quality of life, but many product users and healthcare professionals are unaware of available options. No evidence-based guidance on choosing products exists despite known physical and psychological burdens of poorly managed leakage (e.g. isolation, anxiety, depression, skin damage). DESIGN AND METHODS: 4 phases, underpinned by international decision aid guidance. Evidence/expert opinion: Literature review; consultation with specialist continence clinicians (n = 7) to establish evidence base. Prototype: CP-PDA developed with continence specialist (n = 7) feedback. Alpha testing (stakeholders): CP-PDA materials were provided to expert patients (n = 10) and clinicians (n = 11) to assess content/presentation. Beta testing (field) following CONSORT guidelines, registered NIHR CPMS 31077: Men (n = 50) postradical prostatectomy randomised to evaluate usability and decision-making using the Decisional Conflict Scale compared with usual care. RESULTS: An algorithm differentiating patients by mobility, dependency, cognitive impairment and type/level of leakage, leading to 12 user groups, was developed. For each group, an option table and associated product information sheets guide product choice. Total Decisional Conflict Score for men using the CP-PDA was significantly better than for men without. CP-PDA users reported greater confidence in product knowledge and choice. CONCLUSION: This is the first evidence-based CP-PDA, developed using an internationally recognised method. Compared to usual care, it significantly reduced decisional conflict for men choosing continence products postprostatectomy. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The CP-PDA provides nurses with the first comprehensive, evidence-based intervention to help postprostatectomy men in complex continence product choices. An online version is available: www.continenceproductadvisor.org.

Assessment of male urinary incontinence postprostatectomy through the Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the correlation between the urinary incontinence results of the ICIQ-SF, and those obtained in the 1-hour and 24-hour pad tests, in a sample of men that underwent prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out in patients from the Integrated Management Area of Vigo (EOXI de Vigo) who underwent prostatectomy and suffered from urinary incontinence in the post-surgery period. Loss of urine was assessed by means of the 1-hour and 24-hour pad tests and the ICIQ-SF. A comparative analysis of the questionnaire findings was performed for both urinary incontinence tests. RESULTS: A correlation is observed between the ICIQ-SF and the amount of urine loss in the 1-hour and the 24-hour pad tests. However, the severity of urine loss established by instruments is less consistent. The 24-hour pad test is the one that obtained better correlation with the ICIQ-SF. CONCLUSIONS: The ICIQ-SF should be validated in a male population after prostatectomy in order to reinterpret the severity values observed in the different instruments studied. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

A Cost Analysis of Icon Reusable Underwear Versus Disposable Pads for Mild to Moderate Urinary Incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to perform a cost analysis assessing the economic feasibility of reusable underwear as alternative for disposable pads for women with mild to moderate urinary incontinence. METHODS: A consumer-perspective cost analysis was performed with the following assumptions: (1) consumers have mild to moderate urinary incontinence and use 2 pads per day (PPD); (2) consumers have a 2-week supply of underwear; (3) there is no difference in laundering cost between 2 incontinence options; (4) there is no difference in use of labor/other accessories of care; (5) there is no difference in skin complaints/associated cost; (6) cost of products are nonfluctuant with time; and (7) all incontinence products were purchased online. Sensitivity analyses were performed varying the longevity of underwear, price of regular underwear, price of pads, pads used per day, and shipping and handling. RESULTS: The total cost of disposable pads with regular underwear was US $392.40, whereas the cost of Icon underwear was US $380.80 over the course of 2 years. Icon costs less than using regular underwear with disposable pads as long as the cost of the regular underwear is at least US $2.17. Icon is economically inferior if the cost per pad is US $0.15 when using 3 PPD or if the cost per pad is US $0.24 when using less than 2 PPD. CONCLUSIONS: Reusable incontinence underwear can be an economically feasible alternative to disposable pads for light to moderate urinary incontinence after 2 years of use assuming underwear has a 2-year longevity and the consumer is using 2 PPD with regular underwear.

The preoperative pad test as a predictor of urinary incontinence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, observational, clinical study.

PURPOSE: To assess whether the preoperative 1-h pad test could predict postoperative urinary incontinence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A total of 329 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between 2013 and 2016 were prospectively enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into the preoperative urinary continence group and the preoperative urinary incontinence group according to the 1-h pad test. The time to achieve urinary continence, lower urinary tract function evaluated by uroflowmetry and post-voided residual urine volume, and quality of life evaluated by King's Health Questionnaire and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: There were 190 patients (58%) in the preoperative urinary continence group (1-h pad test ≤ 2 g) and 139 patients (42%) in the preoperative urinary incontinence group (1-h pad test > 2 g). In the preoperative urinary continence/incontinence groups, 83%/76% of patients achieved continence within 12 months, respectively, and urinary incontinence remained significantly longer in the preoperative incontinence group than in the preoperative continence group (P = 0.042). Although there were no significant differences in all quality of life items between the two groups before surgery, several items were significantly higher in the preoperative urinary continence group. CONCLUSION: Achievement of urinary continence and improvement of urinary quality of life are delayed in patients with preoperative urinary incontinence assessed by the 1-h pad test. The preoperative 1-h pad test could be a useful predictor of prolonged urinary incontinence and poor quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Permanent prostate brachytherapy is safe in men with severe baseline lower urinary tract symptoms.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term urinary outcomes of men with severe pretreatment lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) ± external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 105 men with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) 20-35 before PPB were categorized by IPSS change at last followup: (1) worse = IPSS rise >3; (2) no change = IPSS change within three points of baseline; (3) improved = IPSS fall by >3 points. We then evaluated patients who worsened vs. those who did not (no change or improved) with respect to incontinence outcomes, LUTS medication usage, and predictors of symptom worsening. RESULTS: Mean followup was 80.3 ± 55.8 months. Mean age was 66.3 ± 7.1 years; mean pretreatment IPSS was 23.6 ± 3.0. Overall mean improvement in IPSS was 7.6 ± 9.3. Specifically, 14.3% (15/105) worsened, 21.9% (23/105) had no significant change, and 63.8% (67/105) improved. There were no patient- or treatment-related factors significantly associated with long-term worsening of urinary symptoms. No men required anticholinergic therapy at last followup, whereas 7% (8/105) were using an alpha blocker. Only 2.9% (3/105) of men were using at least one pad daily at last followup. Alternatively, only 7.7% (8/105) reported subjective incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: PPB is an acceptable option in the setting of severe baseline LUTS in appropriately selected and counseled patients when performed by a skilled practitioner.

Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term outcomes and erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuffs vs larger cuffs amongst men with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), with and without a history of pelvic radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all men who underwent AUS placement by a single surgeon between September 2009 and June 2017 at our tertiary urban medical centre. A uniform perineal approach was used to ensure cuff placement around the most proximal corpus spongiosum after precise spongiosal measurement. Patients were stratified by cuff size and RT status, and patient demographics and surgical outcomes were analysed. Cases of AUS revision in which a new cuff was not placed were excluded. Success was defined as patient-reported pad use of ≤1 pad/day. RESULTS: Amongst 410 cases included in the analysis, the 3.5-cm cuff was used in 166 (40.5%), whilst 244 (59.5%) received larger cuffs (≥4.0 cm). Over a median follow-up of 50 months, there was AUS cuff erosion in 44 patients at a rate nearly identical in the 3.5-cm cuff (10.8%, 18/166) and the ≥4-cm cuff groups (10.7%, 26/244, P = 0.7). On multivariate logistic regression, clinical factors associated with AUS cuff erosion included a history of pelvic RT, prior AUS cuff erosion, prior urethroplasty, and a history of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. Patient demographics were similar between the cuff-size groups; including age, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking history, RT history, prior AUS, and prior IPP placement. Continence rates were high amongst all AUS patients, with similar success in both groups (82% for 3.5-cm cuff, 90% for ≥4-cm cuff, P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: After 8 years of experience and extended follow-up, the outcomes of the 3.5-cm AUS cuff appear to be similar to ≥4-cm cuffs for effectiveness and rates of urethral erosion. RT patients have a higher risk of cuff erosion regardless of cuff size.

Physical Activity Patterns and Sedentary Behavior in Older Women With Urinary Incontinence: an Accelerometer-based Study.

PURPOSE: Objective physical activity data for women with urinary incontinence are lacking. We investigated the relationship between physical activity, sedentary behavior, and the severity of urinary symptoms in older community-dwelling women with urinary incontinence using accelerometers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a study that measured physical activity (step count, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity time) and sedentary behavior (percentage of sedentary time, number of sedentary bouts per day) using a triaxial accelerometer in older community-dwelling adult women not actively seeking treatment of their urinary symptoms. The relationship between urinary symptoms and physical activity variables was measured using linear regression. RESULTS: Our cohort of 35 community-dwelling women (median, age, 71 years) demonstrated low physical activity (median daily step count, 2168; range, 687-5205) and high sedentary behavior (median percentage of sedentary time, 74%; range, 54%-89%). Low step count was significantly associated with nocturia (P = 0.02). Shorter duration of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity time was significantly associated with nocturia (P = 0.001), nocturnal enuresis (P = 0.04), and greater use of incontinence products (P = 0.04). Greater percentage of time spent in sedentary behavior was also significantly associated with nocturia (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Low levels of physical activity are associated with greater nocturia and nocturnal enuresis. Sedentary behavior is a new construct that may be associated with lower urinary tract symptoms. Physical activity and sedentary behavior represent potential new targets for treating nocturnal urinary tract symptoms.

Instrumentos de avaliação dos eventos adversos associados ao uso de fraldas geriátricas / Instruments for assessing adverse events associated with the use of geriatric diapers

Objetivo: analisar instrumentos de avaliação dos eventos adversos associados ao uso de fraldas geriátricas. Métodos: revisão integrativa da literatura, nas bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE, CINAHL e EMBASE, com publicações em português, inglês e espanhol. Na análise dos dados, a categorização ocorreu pela identificação dos eventos adversos e instrumentos de rastreio. Resultados: das 19 publicações, identificaram-se como eventos adversos e respectivos instrumentos: déficit motor/índice de Barthel; incontinência/Kings's Health Questionnaire e International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form; umidade da pele/Transepidermal Water Loss; qualidade de vida/Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; dermatite associada à incontinência/Escala de Avaliação Perineal de Nix. Conclusão: foram analisados instrumentos que avaliaram os eventos adversos associados ao uso de fraldas que podem ser potencialmente utilizados na prática de enfermagem. (AU)

Effectiveness and Complications of the AMS AdVance™ Male Sling System for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of the AdVance Male Sling System for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in patients after prostatic surgery. METHODS: An international, observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted on male patients with urinary incontinence after prostatic surgery. Patients underwent a 24-hour pad test with a threshold at 250 g. All patients were operated with the same AdVance implant procedure. They were seen 6 weeks later, and examined again at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Incontinence was measured using 1-hour and 24-hour pad tests, the number of protective pads used, ICIQ-SF and IQoL questionnaires. Success was defined as no urinary leakage and no pad use. Patient improvement was defined as a reduction of more than 50% in leakage and no more than one pad used per day. Any perioperative and late complications were documented. RESULTS: From January 2007 to November 2012, 113 patients were successfully operated on. At 24 months after surgery, the mean weight of the 1-hour pad test had decreased from 48.7 g to 6.6 g (P < 0.001) while that of the 24-hour pad test decreased to 45.0 g from 113.9 g (P < 0.001). Success and improvement occurred in 22.6% and 58.0% of the patients, respectively. Seventy-five patients (80.6%) used none or one protective pad daily, and the IQoL and ICIQ-SF scores were both significantly improved. Fourteen patients (12.4%) required a second intervention. Three patients (2.7%) had a Clavien IIIb complication. CONCLUSION: The AdVance Male Sling System is an effective treatment for mild to moderate male stress urinary incontinence. Complications from its use are rare and 24-month results are satisfactory.

A Combination of Findings Obtained from Pre- and Postoperative Imaging Predict Recovery of Urinary Continence After Non-nerve-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to identify the reliable predictor for early recovery of urinary continence (UC) after non-nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (NNS-LRP) according to the findings of pre- and postoperative imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 215 patients who underwent NNS-LRP was carried out. Early recovery of UC was defined as using no pads or one security pad per day within 3 months. Preoperative membranous urethral length (MUL) measured on MRI and postoperative bladder neck angle (BNA) identified by cystography were analyzed to evaluate the relationship with recovery of UC. Patients were divided into three groups based on MUL and BNA (Group A: MUL ≥12.1 mm and BNA ≥103°, Group B: either MUL ≥12.1 mm or BNA ≥103°, Group C: MUL <12.1 mm and BNA <103°. RESULTS: Early recovery rates were 80.3% in patients with MUL ≥12.1 mm, 37.5% in patients with MLU<12.1 (p<0.001), and 77.8% in patients with BNA ≥103°, 50% in patients with BNA <103°(p<0.001). In the combination of the two parameters, early recovery rates were 90.4%, 58%, and 36.1% in group A, B and C respectively (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curve of the time to recovery of UC showed significant differences among the three groups (log rank test: p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A combination of preoperative MUL and postoperative BNA was the reliable predictor of recovery of UC after NNS-LRP. Longer MUL with wider BNA is significantly and positively associated with an early recovery of UC.