Tamsulosin 0.8 mg daily dose in management of BPH patients with failed tamsulosin 0.4 mg monotherapy and unfit for surgical intervention.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering double-dose tamsulosin (0.8 mg) for treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who have not responded to the standard single dose of tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and are deemed unsuitable for transurethral resection (TUR) intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2022 and July 2023, we prospectively analyzed 111 patients who were experiencing severe BPH symptoms. These patients received a double dose of tamsulosin for one month. We collected baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, and underlying medical conditions. Various parameters including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-void residual volume were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: All 111 patients completed the study. The mean age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 63.12 ± 4.83 years, 3.42 ± 0.93 ng/ml, and 50.37 ± 19.23 ml, respectively. Of these patients, 93 showed improvement in Qmax, post-void residual volume, and IPSS score (p-value = 0.001). The total IPSS score and total Qmax improved from 24.03 ± 2.49 and 7.72 ± 1.64 ml/sec to 16.41 ± 3.84 and 12.08 ± 2.37 ml/sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: Double-dose 0.8mg tamsulosin as an alpha-blocker therapy appears to be a viable temporary management option for BPH patients who have not responded to the standard single dose 0.4mg tamsulosin and are not suitable candidates for TUR intervention.

Evaluation of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg versus 0.8 mg in management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and the safety of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and 0.8 mg/day in patients suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective interventional, double-blinded, controlled study was carried out on 93 patients who met the criteria and divided randomly into two groups: group A for Tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and group B for Tamsulosin 0.8 mg/day. International prostate symptom score, post void residual urine volume, and maximum flow rate of urine were assessed before and after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Both study groups showed a significant reduction in storage sub-score but only frequency was significantly reduced in group B (P < 0.001). On the other hand, Tamsulosin 0.8 mg was superior to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg regarding voiding sub-score except for straining (P = 0.325). Accordingly, the total international prostate symptom score was significantly improved in group B versus group A (P < 0.001). Furthermore, maximum flow rate and post-void residual urine volume were notably improved in Group B as compared to Group A (P < 0.001). Of all adverse events only dizziness was noted to be statistically significant in Group B versus Group A (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin 0.8 mg has shown better outcomes in treating patients who suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement than Tamsulosin 0.4 mg, and besides that, it is well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: M S 292/2020, SID: 373, date: 22/4/2020.

Free combination of dutasteride plus tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in South Korea: analysis of drug utilization and adverse events using the National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use and safety of free combination therapy (dutasteride and tamsulosin), dutasteride monotherapy, or tamsulosin monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: This non-interventional retrospective cohort study used claims data from the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment-National Patient Sample database. Patients with BPH ≥ 40 years of age receiving combination therapy (dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily) or dutasteride 0.5 mg, or tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily dose between 2012 and 2017 were included. The frequency, duration of treatment and risk of any adverse event (AE) or serious AE (SAE) was compared for combination therapy versus each monotherapy using non-inferiority testing. RESULTS: Of 14,755 eligible patients, 1529 (10.4%) received combination therapy, 6660 (45.1%) dutasteride monotherapy, and 6566 (44.5%) tamsulosin monotherapy. The proportion of patients treated with combination therapy exceeded the pre-specified 3% threshold for 'frequent' use. Safety results indicated a similar risk of any AE and SAE irrespective of treatment group. The adjusted relative risk for any AE over the treatment observation period comparing combination therapy with dutasteride monotherapy was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.12), and with tamsulosin monotherapy was 0.98 (95% CI 0.95, 1.02) demonstrating non-inferiority. The adjusted relative risk for any SAE was 1.07 (95% CI 0.66, 1.74) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.56, 1.45), compared with dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapy, respectively. Although the SAE results did not statistically demonstrate non-inferiority of combination therapy based on pre-specified margins, the 95% CI for the risk ratio estimates included the null with a lower limit below the non-inferiority margins, indicating no meaningful differences in SAE risk between groups. Absolute SAE risks were low. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin is frequently used in real-world practice in South Korea for treatment of BPH and demonstrates a safety profile similar to either monotherapy.

Efficacy and tolerability of the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens compared to tamsulosin in moderate-severe LUTS-BPH patients.

In a subset analysis of data from a 6-month, multicenter, non-interventional study, we compared change in symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and treatment tolerability, in men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) receiving tamsulosin (TAM, 0.4 mg/day) or the hexanic extract of Serenoa repens (HESr, 320 mg/day) as monotherapy. Symptoms and QoL were assessed using the IPSS and BII questionnaires, respectively. Patients in the treatment groups were matched using two statistical approaches (iterative and propensity score matching). Within the iterative matching approach, data was available from a total of 737 patients (353 TAM, 384 HESr). After 6 months, IPSS scores improved by a mean (SD) of 5.0 (4.3) points in the TAM group and 4.5 (4.7) points in the HESr group (p = 0.117, not significant). Improvements in QoL were equivalent in the two groups. TAM patients reported significantly more adverse effects than HESr patients (14.7% vs 2.1%; p < 0.001), particularly ejaculation dysfunction and orthostatic hypotension. These results show that HESr is a valid treatment option for men with moderate/severe LUTS/BPH; improvements in urinary symptoms and QoL were similar to those observed for tamsulosin, but with considerably fewer adverse effects.

Impact of early vs. delayed initiation of dutasteride/tamsulosin combination therapy on the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH-related surgery in LUTS/BPH patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms at risk of disease progression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of delayed start of combination therapy (CT) with dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg on the risk of acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related surgery (AUR/S) in patients with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) at risk of disease progression. METHODS: Using a time-to-event model based on pooled data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials, clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed to assess the risk of AUR/S up to 48 months in moderate-to-severe LUTS/BPH patients following immediate and delayed start of CT for those not responding to tamsulosin monotherapy. Simulation scenarios (1300 subjects/arm) were investigated, including immediate start (reference) and alternative delayed start (six scenarios 1-24 months). AUR/S incidence was described by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and analysed using log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events as well as the relative and attributable risks were summarised stratified by treatment. RESULTS: Survival curves for patients starting CT at month 1 and 3 did not differ from those who initiated CT immediately. By contrast, significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed when switch to CT occurs ≥ 6 months from the initial treatment. At month 48, AUR/S incidence was 4.6% vs 9.5%, 11.0% and 11.3% in patients receiving immediate CT vs. switchers after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Start of CT before month 6 appears to significantly reduce the risk of AUR/S compared with delayed start by ≥ 6 months. This has implications for the treatment algorithm for men with LUTS/BPH at risk of disease progression.

Periprostatic fat thickness measured on MRI correlates with lower urinary tract symptoms, erectile function, and benign prostatic hyperplasia progression.

This study investigated the correlation between periprostatic fat thickness (PPFT) measured on magnetic resonance imaging and lower urinary tract symptoms, erectile function, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) progression. A total of 286 treatment-naive men diagnosed with BPH in our department between March 2017 and February 2019 were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the median value of PPFT: high (PPFT >4.35 mm) PPFT group and low (PPFT <4.35 mm) PPFT group. After the initial evaluation, all patients received a combination drug treatment of tamsulosin and finasteride for 12 months. Of the 286 enrolled patients, 244 completed the drug treatment course. Patients with high PPFT had larger prostate volume (PV; P = 0.013), higher International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS; P = 0.008), and lower five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score (P = 0.002) than those with low PPFT. Both high and low PPFT groups showed significant improvements in PV, maximum flow rate, IPSS, and quality of life score and a decrease of IIEF-5 score after the combination drug treatment. The decrease of IIEF-5 score was more obvious in the high PPFT group than that in the low PPFT group. In addition, more patients in the high PPFT group underwent prostate surgery than those in the low PPFT group. Moreover, Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis indicated that PPFT was positively correlated with age, PV, and IPSS and negatively correlated with IIEF-5 score; however, body mass index was only negatively correlated with IIEF-5 score.

Rate of urinary retention after ileostomy takedown in men and role of routine placement of urinary catheter.

Ileostomy takedown has been proposed as one of the procedures where the placement of the catheters can be avoided, however, the rate of UR after ileostomy takedown is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the rate of UR after ileostomy takedown and the potential benefit of perioperative Tamsulosin. Retrospective cohort study of men undergoing ileostomy takedown after pelvic colorectal surgery between January 2009 and December 2016. A total of 100 patients were identified. The rate of UR after ileostomy takedown was high at 26%. There were no instances of urinary tract infection, however, most instances of UR were in patients who did not have catheter in surgery (96% vs. 4%, p = 0.044). Perioperative use of tamsulosin did not result in significant decrease in urinary retention. Rates of urinary retention after ileostomy takedown are high. Although not placing the catheter may be protective against urinary tract infections, patients should be counseled about the possibility of UR after ileostomy takedown.

Comparison of Serenoa repens With Tamsulosin in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Studies reported that Serenoa repens was effective in relieving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This article carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare Serenoa repens with tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) after at least 6-month treatment cycle. Four studies involving 1,080 patients (543 in the Serenoa repens group and 537 in the tamsulosin group) were included in the meta-analysis. The results were as follows: compared with tamsulosin, Serenoa repens had a same effect in treating BPH in terms of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (mean difference [MD] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.33, 1.59], p = 0.20), quality of life (QoL) (MD 1.51, 95% CI [-1.51, 4.52], p = 0.33), maximum flow rate (Qmax) (MD 0.27, 95% CI [-0.15, 0.68], p = 0.21), postvoid residual volume (PVR) (MD -4.23, 95% CI [-22.97, 14.44], p = 0.65), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (MD 0.46, 95% CI [-0.06, 0.97], p = 0.08) with the exception of prostate volume (PV) (MD -0.29, 95% CI [-0.41, -0.17], p < 0.00001). For side effects, Serenoa repens was well tolerated compared with tamsulosin especially in ejaculation disorders (odds ratio [OR] = 12.56, 95% CI [3.83, 41.18], p < 0.0001) and decreased libido (OR = 5.40; 95% CI [1.17, 24.87]; p = 0.03). This study indicated that Serenoa repens had the same effect in treating BPH compared with tamsulosin in terms of IPSS, QoL, and PVR after at least 6-month treatment cycle, however, the latter had a greater improvement in PV compared with the former. And Serenoa repens did not increase the risk of adverse events especially with respect to ejaculation disorders and libido decrease.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different kinds of PDE5-Is with tamsulosin as a medical therapy for LUTS secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

BACKGROUND: Drug therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is a major and popular method. However, the therapeutic strategy is still not clear enough up to now. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative safety and efficacy of different types of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) with tamsulosin for the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, OpenGrey, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science will be searched to identify qualified studies. We will use the Stata version 13.0 to conduct the network meta-analysis (NMA) with a random or fixed effects model of Bayesian framework. International prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow fate (Qmax) and their credible intervals (CI) will be used to compare every medical intervention with the efficacy and safety, including sildenafil plus tamsulosin, tadalafil plus tamsulosin, vardenafil plus tamsulosin. And the ranking of probability of different interventions will be estimated by comparing the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: A high quality-synthesis of the current evidence for comparing with different doses or types of PDE5-Is combined with tamsulosin to the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH will be provided. CONCLUSIONS: This NMA and systematic review will generate evidence to help choose the best combination for treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH.PROSPERO registration number: PROSPERO CRD 42019139062.

Treatment persistence with a fixed-dose combination of tadalafil (5 mg) and tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and reasons for early discontinuation in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction.

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to assess treatment persistence with a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of tadalafil (5 mg) and tamsulosin (0.4 mg). This study also evaluated the reasons for early treatment discontinuation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction who started an FDC treatment of tadalafil (5 mg) and tamsulosin (0.4 mg) between July 2017 and February 2018. Treatment persistence and reasons for early discontinuation were evaluated during the first 6 months. The cumulative discontinuation rate and differences in various parameters were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test, respectively. Factors related to persistence were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Overall, 97 patients were included in the study. The cumulative persistence rate at 30, 90, and 180 days was 88.7%, 66.0%, and 54.6%, respectively. The cumulative persistence over 6 months differed significantly according to the administration of FDC therapy (log-rank p=0.005) and age (log-rank p=0.024). Younger patients (odds ratio, 2.049; p=0.021) and treatment-naive patients (odds ratio, 2.461; p=0.006) were more likely to discontinue therapy within 6 months. The common reasons for discontinuing therapy were side effects (63.6%) and perceived poor efficacy (22.7%). Conclusions: Side effects were reported to be the main reason for treatment discontinuation. Thus, to improve compliance for a once-daily FDC of tadalafil (5 mg) and tamsulosin (0.4 mg), it is recommended to select patients who show adaptation to a combination of α-blockers and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors prior to FDC treatment.

The effect of alpha blocker treatment prior to prostate biopsy on voiding functions, pain scores and health-related quality-of-life outcomes: A prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of alpha-blocker treatment prior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) on voiding functions, pain scores and health-related quality-of-life outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to April 2019, a total of 112 patients underwent TRUS-Bx due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination findings. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received pharmacological treatment before biopsy. Group 1 consisted of patients with no alpha-blocker treatment prior to biopsy and Group 2 consisted of patients who received Tamsulosin for one week before biopsy continuing for one week after biopsy. Voiding function was evaluated three times using the validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and uroflowmetry (maximal flow rate (Qmax) and residual volume (PVR)). The Turkish version of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item Questionnaire (SF-36) was used to assess health-related quality of life. Pain scores were rated according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) just after the biopsy procedure. RESULTS: Mean IPSS and Qmax on the post-biopsy 7 day were significantly in favor of Group 2 (P<0.001, P=0.004). Although post-biopsy day 7 PVR was similar between the groups, Δ1 PVR was significantly in favor of Group 2 (P=0.004). Mean VAS score was 2.7±2.3 for the Tamsulosin group and 4.2±2.2 for the control group (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between two groups according to baseline and postoperative 1st month SF-36 scores. CONCLUSION: Alpha-blocker therapy prior to TRUS-Bx is effective in preventing voiding dysfunction and biopsy-related pain in patients undergoing TRUS-Bx. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

A first case of fixed drug eruption due to Tamsulosin.

BACKGROUND: Fixed Drug Eruption (FDE) is a drug reaction involving the skin and less commonly the mucosal membranes. Tamsulosin is an alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blocker used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia. Dizziness and headache are among its most common side effects (Singapore Med J, 2018;59:336). Although cutaneous drug eruption has been reported with other alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blockers. AIMS: Drug rash due to Tamsulosin is relatively uncommon (Singapore Med J, 2018;59:336). In this case we report an incidence of fixed drug eruption due to Tamsulosin. PATIENTS: A 54 year old male, with benign prostatic hyperplasia was referred to our office for evaluation of certain eruptions, having developed his hyper-pigmented patches after 2 weeks of using oral 0.4 mg Tamsulosin per day. Based on the clinical course and the skin biopsy we diagnosed the condition as Tamsulosin associated fixed drug eruption. The most important therapeutic measure was discontinuing Tamsulosin medication. Following this, his eruptions improved remarkably in a few days without complications. RESULTS: According to previous findings, there has been no case report on fixed drug eruption caused by Tamsulosin. CONCLUSION: Our case is a relatively mild form of fixed drug eruption. Therefore it should be kept in mind that a severe cutaneous drug eruption might occur after Tamsulosin administration.

Tamsulosin to Prevent Postoperative Urinary Retention After Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effect of tamsulosin on postoperative urinary retention in female patients after pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: Data were obtained from a retrospective, matched cohort of female patients who were admitted after pelvic reconstructive surgery at a single academic institution. Patients who received tamsulosin were compared with those who did not at a 1:4 ratio, matched by surgical procedure. Patients were excluded if they were discharged on the day of surgery or if an intraoperative complication necessitated prolonged postoperative bladder drainage. Information on demographics, preoperative diagnoses, prolapse stage, preoperative voiding dysfunction, urodynamic findings, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, and voiding outcomes up to 6 weeks after surgery was gathered. The primary outcome was postoperative urinary retention, defined by failure of an active voiding trial. RESULTS: Patients underwent surgery between January 2016 and March 2018. We identified 35 patients who received tamsulosin and matched to 140 controls. Patients in the tamsulosin group were younger; groups were otherwise similar. Patients who received tamsulosin after surgery were less likely to develop postoperative urinary retention (2.9% vs 24.3%, P = 0.004). After controlling for confounders, multivariable logistic regression identified tamsulosin use as the only independent predictor of postoperative urinary retention with a significant protective effect (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.67; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic tamsulosin use may be effective in preventing postoperative urinary retention in female patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

A Prospective, Open-Label Comparison of Tamsulosin plus Serenoa repens and Bovine Colostrum versus Tamsulosin Alone in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral supplementation with Serenoa repens (SR) and bovine colostrum (BC) plus tamsulosin (TAM) versus TAM alone over 12 months in men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Between February 2018 and February 2019, men with symptomatic BPH (IPSS ≥10) were prospectively recruited. This prospective, open-label, 12-month study included two different protocols: (1) group A, SR 320 mg/day + BC 30 mg/day + TAM 0.4 mg/day, and (2) group B, TAM 0.4 mg/day only. RESULTS: Overall, 148 patients entered the study, 76 in group A and 72 in group B. At 12 months, the total IPSS had decreased by 5.5 with TAM + SR + BC and by 5.1 with TAM only (p = 0.21). However, when the total IPSS was divided into storage and voiding subscores, at 6 months the storage symptoms had improved significantly more with TAM + SR + BC (-1.6 vs. -0.9 with TAM only, p = 0.02), with the benefit persisting also at the 1-year evaluation (-1.8 vs. -0.8, p = 0.02). Moreover, the improvement in LUTS-related quality of life (QoL) was significantly different between the groups, with a mean decrease in IPSS QoL subscore of -2.5 ± 0.2 for TAM + SR + BC versus -1.8 ± 0.3 for TAM at 6 months (p = 0.04), and of -2.9 ± 0.4 for TAM + SR + BC versus -2.1 ± 0.4 for TAM at 12 months (p = 0.04). Conversely, no significant differences were found in maximal urinary flow rate (p = 0.38), postvoid residual volume (p = 0.12), prostate-specific antigen (p = 0.41), and prostate volume (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Combination treatment with SR and BC plus TAM was shown to be more effective than treatment with TAM only in improving IPSS storage and QoL subscores in BPH patients after 6 months and up to 12 months of treatment.

Characteristics of men with untreated LUTS interested in over-the-counter tamsulosin.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is often delayed, as it is considered a natural progression of aging. We described baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of men currently not using prescription medications for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) but interested in self-directed use of over-the-counter (OTC) tamsulosin and who had participated in OTC tamsulosin-simulated studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled baseline data from four OTC tamsulosin-simulated studies were analyzed for men who were currently not using BPH prescription medication and who believed that OTC tamsulosin was appropriate for use or were interested in purchasing it. Data from the OTC-simulated studies for men using BPH prescription medication and from the BPH registry, which included men diagnosed with BPH, were used for comparison. RESULTS: Overall, 3285 non-prescription-using men (mean age +/- standard deviation [SD], 60.6 +/- 11.6 years) were included. Average American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) total score was 17.6; 25.5% reported urinary symptoms for > 5 years. Overall, 46.7% of these men had > 1 visit/year with their physicians. Baseline characteristics of prescription users from the OTC-simulated studies (n = 364; mean age ± SD, 68.3 +/- 9.1 years; mean AUA-SI score, 18.5) and of men from the BPH registry (n = 5042; 64.8 +/- 10 years; 11.6) were similar to those of non-prescription users. CONCLUSIONS: Non-prescription users had long term moderate-to-severe male LUTS, yet remained untreated; self-management may be a viable alternative strategy for this population. Disease characteristics of men not using BPH prescription medication and interested in using OTC tamsulosin were similar to those using BPH medication or diagnosed with BPH.

The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Prophylactic Tamsulosin Does Not Reduce the Risk of Urinary Retention Following Lower Extremity Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common. Selective alpha-1 adrenergic antagonists, such as tamsulosin, are effective for treating urinary retention. The purpose of this study is to determine whether perioperative prophylactic tamsulosin reduces the incidence of POUR following total hip and knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Male patients 35 years of age and older undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty at a single center from 2015 to 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized to receive tamsulosin 0.4 mg or placebo daily for 5 days preoperatively, the morning of surgery, and the first postoperative day. The incidence of POUR was determined during the postoperative hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were enrolled in the study. Two patients were withdrawn prior to randomization. The remaining 174 were randomized to tamsulosin (n = 87) or placebo (n = 87). After an additional 43 patients were withdrawn prior to surgery, 131 patients completed the study (tamsulosin, n = 64; placebo, n = 67). A total of 42 patients (32.1%) developed POUR, with 18 cases (28.1%) in the tamsulosin group and 24 cases (35.8%) in the placebo group (P = .345), resulting in an odds ratio of 0.701 and a risk difference of 7.69%. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic tamsulosin did not reduce the incidence of POUR after hip and knee arthroplasty compared to placebo. The odds ratio indicates an approximately 30% decreased odds of developing POUR in the tamsulosin group, albeit not statistically significant. Tamsulosin does not appear to be effective as a prophylactic measure for reducing POUR in male hip and knee arthroplasty patients.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of combination of tamsulosin plus dutasteride compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: We performed a meta-analysis to confirm the efficacy and safety of the combination of tamsulosin plus dutasteride compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) during a treatment cycle of at least 1 year. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were searched by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Systematic review was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The data was evaluated and statistically analyzed by using RevMan version 5.3.0. RESULTS: Five studies including 4348 patients were studied. The analysis found that the combination group was significantly greater effect in international prostate symptom score (mean difference [MD], - 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 2.20 to - 0.66; P = 0.0003), prostate volume (MD, - 10.13; 95% CI, - 12.38 to - 7.88; P < 0.00001), transitional zone volume (MD, - 3.18; 95% CI, - 3.57 to - 2.79; P<0.0001), maximum urine flow rate (MD, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.29; P < 0.00001), prostate specific antigen (MD, - 0.54; 95% CI, - 0.80 to - 0.29; P < 0.0001) and post-void residual volume (MD, - 3.85; 95% CI, - 4.95 to - 2.76; P < 0.00001) compared with the tamsulosin group. In terms of safety, including adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 2.06; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.17; P = 0.001), erectile dysfunction (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.92; P < 0.00001), ejaculation disorder (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.97 to 5.79; P < 0.0001), retrograde ejaculation (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.93; P = 0.03), decreased libido (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.53 to 3.31; P < 0.0001) and loss of libido (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.94 to 5.88; P<0.0001), the combination group showed poor tolerance than the tamsulosin group with the exception of dizziness (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.80; P = 0.50). The combination group significantly reduced the risk of clinical progression than the tamsulosin group especially in incidence of BPH-related symptom progression (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.67; P < 0.00001) and acute urinary retention (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.98; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The combination of tamsulosin plus dutasteride provides a preferable therapeutic effect for BPH with a higher incidence of sexual side effects, but combination-therapy can markedly reduce risk of BPH-related symptom progression and acute urinary retention relative to tamsulosin monotherapy.

Management of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in a Simulated, Over-the-Counter Setting: An Exploratory Study of Tamsulosin.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common in men, considerably affecting quality of life. AIMS: The self-directed use of over-the-counter (OTC) tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and potential safety risks were evaluated in an open-label, uncontrolled, exploratory, 8-week OTC-simulated study. METHODS: Men (≥ 18 years) were recruited via mass advertising about bothersome LUTS. In a working retail environment, respondents reviewed the product and decided whether it was appropriate for them to use (self-selection phase). After purchasing the product, participants' ability to use it as directed by the proposed drug facts label (DFL) was assessed (home-use phase). RESULTS: Of 1446 eligible men, 679 completed the self-selection phase, and 73.9% (502/679) self-selected to use tamsulosin correctly according to the DFL. Of 369 participants who purchased tamsulosin and entered the home-use phase, 321 took one or more doses of tamsulosin and participated in at least one telephone interview. In total, 85.4% (274/321) of participants adhered to the 'Stop Use' and 'Directions' instructions in the DFL. Overall, 139 (39.6%) participants experienced one or more adverse events (AEs); 65 (18.5%) were deemed drug-related, including dizziness (11 [3.1%]), ejaculation disorder (6 [1.7%]), and semen volume decrease (6 [1.7%]). No unexpected AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Of the men interested in self-managing their LUTS, a majority had moderate-to-severe LUTS of long duration. Most men were able to appropriately self-select and use tamsulosin in concordance with DFL instructions and directions. No unexpected AEs were reported during self-directed use. With further label refinement, an over-the-counter tamsulosin option might be feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01726270.

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once-daily in Asian men with both lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo- and tamsulosin-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in Asian men with both lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction. METHODS: The present phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo- and tamsulosin-controlled study was carried out at 40 study centers in the Asia-Pacific region (mainland China, Taiwan and Korea; NCT01937871). Participants were randomized to receive a placebo (n = 361), tadalafil 5 mg (n = 362) or tamsulosin 0.2 mg (n = 185) in a 2:2:1 ratio for 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 909 Asian men were randomized into three groups. After 12 weeks of treatment, a statistically significant improvement in least squares mean change from baseline in total International Prostate Symptom Score was observed in the tadalafil versus the placebo group (-5.49 vs -4.08, respectively; P < 0.001). A statistically significant improvement in the change from baseline for the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score, was observed in tadalafil compared with the placebo at 12 weeks (5.24 vs 1.88, respectively; P < 0.001). A significant improvement was observed in the change from baseline in the percentage of "Yes" responses to Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 in the tadalafil versus placebo group at 12 weeks (23.87% vs 10.90%; P < 0.001 and 36.62% vs 15.96%; P < 0.001, respectively). Safety results were consistent with the known tadalafil safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil is efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of Asian men with both lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction.

Beyond medical expulsive therapy: evolution to supported stone passage for ureteric stones.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of removing tamsulosin from standardized ureteric stone clinical protocols on rate of stone surgery. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, comparison of all patients with unilateral, <1 cm ureteric stones presenting to a stone clinic after discharge from the emergency department during consecutive years. In the initial year, patients were initially offered medical expulsive therapy (MET) with tamsulosin. In the subsequent year, the protocol was modified to focus on symptom control without tamsulosin; this was termed 'supported stone passage' (SSP). The primary outcome was rate of stone surgery within 90 days of the initial clinic encounter. RESULTS: Among 723 patients (360 MET, 363 SSP), the rate of attempted stone passage increased from 65% to 74%, between the initial and the subsequent year (P < 0.016). Tamsulosin prescription in patients to attempting stone passage decreased from 84% to 13% (P < 0.001). In patients attempting stone passage, the rate of stone surgery was 26% in the METand 19% in the SSP group (P = 0.066). The overall surgery rate decreased from 51% in the MET group to 40% in the SSP group (P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis, controlling for age, sex and stone burden, did not demonstrate a difference in either rate of attempting to pass stones or in rate of failure of passage according to care protocol. We were unable to demonstrate an independent effect of tamsulosin on failure of passage. Overall, surgical intervention was less likely in the SSP phase than in the MET phase, with an odds ratio of 0.64 (confidence interval) 0.44-0.91; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Removing tamsulosin from clinical protocols did not impair stone passage in patients attempting to pass stones.