Finding a common definition of heparin resistance in adult cardiac surgery: communication from the ISTH SSC subcommittee on perioperative and critical care thrombosis and hemostasis.

Ensuring adequate anticoagulation for patients requiring cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is important due to the adverse consequences of inadequate anticoagulation with respect to bleeding and thrombosis. When target anticoagulation is not achieved with typical doses, the term heparin resistance is routinely used despite the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. Prior reports and guidance documents that define heparin resistance in patients requiring CPB and guidance documents remain variable based on the lack of standardized criteria. As a result, we conducted a review of clinical trials and reports to evaluate the various heparin resistance definitions employed in this clinical setting and to identify potential standards for future clinical trials and clinical management. In addition, we also aimed to characterize the differences in the reported incidence of heparin resistance in the adult cardiac surgical literature based on the variability of both target-activated clotting (ACT) values and unfractionated heparin doses. Our findings suggest that the most extensively reported ACT target for CPB is 480 seconds or higher. Although most publications define heparin resistance as a failure to achieve this target after a weight-based dose of either 400 U/kg or 500 U/kg of heparin, a standardized definition would be useful to guide future clinical trials and help improve clinical management. We propose the inability to obtain an ACT target for CPB of 480 seconds or more after 500 U/kg as a standardized definition for heparin resistance in this setting.

[Monitoring of heparinization in cardiac surgery with ACT: accreditation of the point-of-care test in the Bordeaux University Hospital Centre]. / Surveillance de l'héparinisation en chirurgie cardiaque par l'ACT : accréditation de l'analyse en biologie délocalisée au CHU de Bordeaux.

ACT (Activated Clotting Time) is a point of care test (POCT) on whole blood, used to monitor the heparinization of patients in the operating room in cardiac surgery (ExtraCorporeal Circulation ECC) and in interventional cardiology (TAVI, AF ablation). The ACT is concerned both by the ISO 22 870 standard and French regulations regarding POCT. We performed an important work at the Bordeaux CHU on its accreditation, by rationalizing and making the park uniform (11 HemochronTM Signature Elite), standardizing the training and the habilitation of operators in medical units, introducing periodic quality controls, centralizing in the laboratory the management of the devices and reagents and by connecting it to the laboratory's computer system (Middleware, SIL et expert softwares). One year after, we have some positive feedbacks with only a few technical problems and with only few remarks raised during internal audits.

Clinical monitoring of activated clotting time during cardiothoracic surgery: comparing the Hemochron® Response and Hemochron® Signature Elite.

INTRODUCTION: The Activated Clotting Time (ACT) is commonly used to manage anticoagulation during cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the older manually operated Hemochron® Response and the automated Hemochron® Signature Elite. METHODS: In this observational study the clinically relevant differences of both devices were investigated simultaneously, using duplicate measurements, in 29 patients who underwent a Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) or Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) in order to determine reliability, bias, and to detect which method has the lowest variation. Blood samples were obtained from the arterial line prior to surgery, after administration of 300 IU/kg heparin, 5 minutes after initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and successively every 30 minutes, and after protamine administration. RESULTS: A total of 202 measurements were performed. Of these 10 measurements were out of range in the Response and 9 in the Elite. About 27 single unstable magnet errors were seen in the Response versus no measurement errors in the Elite. No statistically significant differences between the Response (p = 0.22, Wilcoxon rank) and Elite (p = 0.064) duplicates were observed. The Response values were consistently higher during heparinization than the Elite measurements (p = 0.002, repeated measurements) with an average positive bias of around 56 seconds during heparinization (Bland-Altman). Overall, the coefficient of variation (CoV) increased during heparinization. CONCLUSION: The Elite was more reliable, but the variation was higher for the Elite than the Response. The observed positive bias in the Response compared to the Elite could affect heparin administration during surgery making the two systems not interchangeable.

A Pilot Study to Assess the Clinical Onset of IV Heparin in Interventional Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the onset of heparin anticoagulation, using 2 different measures of activated clotting times (ACT), thromboelastography (TEG; R-time), and anti-Xa levels, after administering low- (100 U/kg) and high- (300 U/kg) dose intravenous (IV) heparin to patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and cardiac surgery, respectively. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Single academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with normal baseline coagulation presenting for TAVR or cardiac valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Coagulation studies were performed at baseline, 30 seconds, 90 seconds, and 180 seconds after IV heparin administration. The tests included iSTAT (iACT) and Hemochron ACT (hACT), TEG R-Time, and anti-Xa levels. At the authors' institution, anti-Xa is the preferred measure of heparin anticoagulation when time permits. ACT, a rapid point- of-care test, is used to assess intraprocedural anticoagulation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After both low- and high-dose heparin, there are peak increases in ACT and anti-Xa at 30 seconds, followed by a decline at 90 seconds and plateau at 180 seconds. The TEG R-time remained elevated (>80 minutes) throughout. For TAVR cases, all anti-Xa was >1.5 IU/mL, and was associated with an iACT >180 seconds and an hACT >200 seconds. For cardiac valve surgery cases, all anti-Xa was >2.4 and associated with an iACT >420 seconds and and hACT >340 seconds. Compared with hACT, iACTs were significantly lower at all time points after low-dose heparin, but not after high-dose heparin. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, heparin anticoagulation was detected as early as 30 seconds after IV administration, based on ACT, anti-Xa levels, and TEG R-time.

Heparin Resistance During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

The use of heparin for anticoagulation has changed the face of cardiac surgery by allowing a bloodless and motionless surgical field throughout the introduction of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, heparin is a drug with complex pharmacologic properties that can cause significant interpatient differences in terms of responsiveness. Heparin resistance during CPB is a weighty issue due to the catastrophic consequences stemming from inadequate anticoagulation, and the treatment of it necessitates a rationalized stepwise approach due to the multifactorial contributions toward this entity. The widespread use of activated clotting time (ACT) as a measurement of anticoagulation during CPB is examined, as it may be a false indicator of heparin resistance. Heparin resistance also has been repeatedly reported in patients infected with COVID-19, which deserves further exploration in this pandemic era. This review aims to examine the variability in heparin potency, underlying mechanisms, and limitations of using ACT for monitoring, as well as provide a framework towards the current management of heparin resistance.

Accuracy of point-of-care coagulation testing during cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient post COVID-19 infection.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal circulation (ECC) in cardiac surgery is performed under systemic heparinization. Adequacy of heparin therapy and anticoagulation during ECC is assessed by activated clotting time (ACT), although there are concerns regarding the reliability of this measure. The ACT can be affected by factors other than heparin anticoagulation. A novel factor that should be considered is the influence of a COVID-19 infection. More than half of the hospitalized COVID-19 patients develop coagulation abnormalities with dysregulated coagulation test results. Patients recently recovered from COVID-19 may still demonstrate some forms of coagulation disorder affecting the ACT. This case describes an inaccurate point-of-care ACT testing in a patient with previous COVID-19 infection undergoing cardiac surgery with ECC and the alternative coagulation testing performed. CASE PRESENTATION: A 77-years-old Caucasian male presented with symptomatic severe mitral valve regurgitation for which he underwent surgery. Medical history revealed a COVID-19 infection one month before surgery. Pre-operative hematological lab results were normal and baseline ACT during surgery was 100 s. To achieve an adequate ACT of > 400 s, multiple doses of heparin were needed and after administration of a triple dose (75,000 IE heparin in total) this adequate ACT was achieved. In the meanwhile we measured anti-Xa level and APTT, which were at adequate levels when ACT was still < 400 s. DISCUSSION: This case emphasizes the need of alternative methods for monitoring heparin therapy in case ACT does not respond adequately. Another point to highlight in this case is the poorly correlated relation between ACT and APTT and anti-Xa in light of the recent COVID-19 infection. Although studies have shown that COVID-19 infection can cause coagulopathy and altered hemostatic parameters, ACT has never been investigated in COVID-19 patient. Understanding the correlation between ACT, APTT and anti-Xa in COVID-19 patients is mandatory.

Variability of three activated clotting time point-of-care systems in cardiac surgery: reinforcing available evidence.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) requires the administration of anticoagulant drugs to maintain ACT ranges 400-600 seconds, which requires exhaustive coagulation monitoring for which various point-of-care devices are available. However, there is variability between them, so we aimed to compare the values in ACT measurement. METHODS: Simultaneous ACT measurements were performed with the Hemochron Response®, Hemostasis Management System Plus® (HMS Plus®) and Hemochron Signature® systems. RESULTS: A total of 255 simultaneous measurements were taken, the mean and standard deviation (SD) of each device were: Hemochron Signature® 361.1 seconds (SD: 156.9), HMS Plus® 412.8 seconds (SD: 180.9) and Hemochron Response® 422.8 seconds (SD: 187.9), being these differences statistically significant (Fridman's test p < 0.01). For comparisons the Bland-Altman method was used, resulting the Hemochron Response® has 61.7 seconds higher mean values than the Hemochron Signature®, the Hemochron Response® 10 seconds higher than the HMS Plus® and the HMS Plus® 51.7 seconds higher than the Hemochron Signature®. CONCLUSION: The differences found in comparisons are considered to be clinically relevant, which is why it is considered important to make the variability of the different monitoring systems known and to take them into account for optimal control of this parameter and its clinical repercussions.

The Standard Point-of-Care Hemochron Jr. ACT+ Test in Monitoring Heparin Administration for Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Severe Factor XII Deficiency.

Coagulation factor XII (FXII) is a plasma serine protease that belongs to the contact activation complex responsible for initiating the intrinsic coagulation pathway. FXII deficiency is a rare congenital disorder that is not associated with an increased tendency for bleeding. However, as contact activation is impaired in FXII deficiency, both the celite- and kaolin-initiated activated clotting time (ACT) measurements are prolonged markedly, which poses a challenge for anticoagulation monitoring in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The authors successfully have used the standard Hemochron Jr. ACT+ test, which is activated by silica and phospholipid in addition to kaolin, to monitor anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass in two patients with severe FXII deficiency. The ACT+ test showed low baseline values, increased adequately in response to heparin, and decreased to baseline after protamine. Importantly, there was no abnormal intra- or postoperative bleeding nor any thrombotic complications. Furthermore, in vitro dose-response ACT+ testing of FXII-deficient blood with increasing heparin concentrations supports the use of ACT+ in FXII deficiency.

A Blinded Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Activated Clotting Time Heparin Management to High Target Active Clotting Time and Individualized Hepcon HMS Heparin Management in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Cardiac Surgical Patients.

PURPOSE: High-dose heparin has been suggested to reduce consumption coagulopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, blinded, prospective trial of patients undergoing elective, complex cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, patients were randomized to one of three groups: 1) high-dose heparin (HH) receiving an initial heparin dose of 450 u/kg, 2) heparin concentration monitoring (HC) with Hepcon Hemostasis Management System (HMS; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) monitoring, or 3) a control group (C) receiving a standard heparin dose of 300 u/kg. Primary outcome measures were blood loss and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: There were 269 patients block randomized based on primary versus redo sternotomy to one of the three groups from August 2001 to August 2003. There was no difference in operative bleeding between the groups. Chest tube drainage did not differ between treatment groups at 8 hours (median [25th percentile, 75th percentile] for control group was 321 [211, 490] compared to 340 [210, 443] and 327 [250, 545], p = 0.998 and p = 0.540, for HH and HC treatment groups, respectively). The percentage of patients receiving transfusion was not different among the groups. CONCLUSION: Higher heparin dosing accomplished by either activated clot time or HC monitoring did not reduce 24-hour intensive care unit blood loss or transfusion requirements.

Robust K-PD model for activated clotting time prediction and UFH dose individualisation during cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Activated clotting time (ACT) is a point-of-care test used to monitor the effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This test sometimes returns aberrant values, which can lead to the administration of an inappropriate dosing regimen. The development of a population-robust K-PD model of UFH could allow the individualisation and automation of UFH therapy during CPB. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study to collect ACT measurements from patients undergoing surgery using CPB. The ACT data were split into a development and validation cohort. The development cohort was used to estimate a standard and robust population K-PD model characterised by a residual error following a normal distribution and student's t-distribution. The ACT prediction performance using Bayesian estimates of individual K-PD parameters was evaluated by comparing predicted versus observed ACTs. Using estimates of the robust K-PD model, a Bayesian individualisation strategy to automate UFH administration was proposed and evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients were included in the study, and 1561 ACTs were collected. In patients without outlier values, Bayesian estimates (based on four ACT measurements) from both standard and robust K-PD models had similar performances, with a median prediction bias close to 0 s. In patients with outlier measurements, the use of the robust K-PD model greatly improved the prediction bias and root-mean-square error (RMSE), with a mean prediction bias of 3.25 s, IQR = [-19.9; 46.03] versus -86 s IQR = [-135.7; -63.8] for the standard model. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the robust Bayesian individualisation strategy allowed the ACT to be maintained above the target using only two to three ACT measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a robust K-PD model reduced prediction bias and RMSE in patients with outlier ACT measurements. The Bayesian individualisation strategy using robust estimates of individual parameters may help automate UFH dosing regimens. Proper clinical validation is warranted before its use in daily clinical practice.

Survey of Practice Pattern in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are routinely anticoagulated with heparin before the initiation of bypass. Heparin is contraindicated, however, in patients with acute HIT, and alternatives to routine practice are often used. While guidelines have recently been published addressing this topic 10, there remains variance between institutions in how these cases are treated. Our goal was to better delineate practice trends in the diagnosis and management of HIT patients requiring CPB. METHODS: We surveyed members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) and the American Society for Extracorporeal Technology (AmSECT) using an online survey tool. RESULTS: We received 304 completed surveys (5.8% response rate), 75% completed by an anesthesiologist, and 24% by a perfusionist. The majority of respondents used clinical history and/or antibody testing (71% and 63%, respectively) to diagnose HIT. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported using an institutional protocol for HIT-CPB cases. Most respondents (89%) reported having at least 1 case in the last 3 years, with a total case experience of at least 785 cases (785 = the minimum number of cases in each case volume category × the number of respondents choosing that category). The strategy recommended in published guidelines, bivalirudin, was the most commonly reported alternative anticoagulation strategy (75%) used by respondents in HIT cases, with most (83%) using the activated clotting time (ACT) to monitor anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Most responding SCA and AmSECT members reported that their institution used a protocol or guideline for HIT/CPB cases, and most guidelines directed the use of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant. Various other methods such as plasmapheresis are also being used with success in this patient population. Further research, including comparison studies of alternative anticoagulant strategies, is required to elucidate the best approach to these difficult cases.

More Effective Anticoagulation During Non-Cardiac Arterial Procedures Using Activated Clotting Time Guided Heparin Administration.

OBJECTIVES: Arterial thrombo-embolic complications (ATEC) are still common during and after non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) despite the administration of (a fixed bolus of) heparin. These ATEC could be due to existing individual differences in heparin sensitivity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of an ACT guided heparin dose protocol and to evaluate if a more effective target ACT can be achieved during NCAP. METHODS: In this multi-center prospective study, 194 patients undergoing elective and non-elective NCAP were enrolled and received heparin according to a heparin dose protocol which aimed to obtain a target ACT of 250 seconds (s.), measured by the Medtronic HMS Plus. Patients received a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU followed by additional boluses depending on the actual ACT. Primary outcome was the ACT value reached. Secondary outcomes were incidence of all ATEC and haemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: The mean baseline ACT was 138 ± 17 s. The mean ACT five minutes after the initial heparin bolus of 5 000 IU was 197 ± 31 s. 48% of patients reached an ACT of 200 s. and six per cent of patients reached an ACT of 250 s. Additional dosages of heparin were administered in 72% of patients. With this ACT guided heparin protocol 86% of patients reached an ACT of 200 s. and 26% of patients reached an ACT of 250 s. A negative correlation was found between body weight and the ACT at T1 (P ˂ 0.001). ATEC and haemorrhagic complications occurred in 11.3% and 16.5% of patients. The lowest incidence of ATEC was found in patients with peak ACT between 200 and 250 s, namely 6.3%. CONCLUSION: This ACT guided heparin protocol proved to be feasible, safe and more patients reached an ACT > of 200 s. compared to a standardized heparin bolus of 5 000 IU. Further research is needed to investigate if ACT guided heparin administration could be preferable over not monitoring the anticoagulant effect of peri-procedural heparin and results in a lower incidence of ATEC, without an increase in haemorrhagic complications.

Less is more: We are administering too much protamine in cardiac surgery.

Context: Protamine is routinely administered to neutralize the anticlotting effects of heparin, traditionally at a dose of 1 mg for every 100 IU of heparin-a 1:1 ratio protamine sparing effects-but this is based more on experience and practice than literature evidence. The use of Hemostasis Management System (HMS) allows an individualized heparin and protamine titration. This usually results in a decreased protamine dose, thus limiting its side effects, including paradox anticoagulation. Aims: This study aims to assess how the use of HMS allows to reduction of protamine administration while restoring the basal activated clotting time (ACT) at the end of cardiac surgery. Settings and Design: A retrospective observational study in a tertiary care university hospital. Subjects and Methods: We analyzed data from 42 consecutive patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for cardiac surgery. For all patients HMS tests were performed before and after CPB, to determine how much heparin was needed to reach target ACT, and how much protamine was needed to reverse it. Results: At the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, 2.2 ± 0.5 mg/kg of protamine was sufficient to reverse heparin effects. The protamine-to-heparin ratio was 0.56:1 over heparin total dose (a 44% reduction) and 0.84:1 over heparin initial dose (a 16% reduction). Conclusion: A lower dose of protamine was sufficient to revert heparin effects after cardiopulmonary bypass. While larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and detect differences in clinically relevant outcomes, the administration of a lower protamine dose is endorsed by current guidelines and may help to avoid the detrimental effects of protamine overdose, including paradox bleeding.

Point-of-Care Measurement of Kaolin Activated Clotting Time during Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single Sample Comparison between ACT Plus and i-STAT.

Heparin anticoagulation monitoring by point-of-care activated clotting time (ACT) is essential for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) initiation, maintenance, and anticoagulant reversal. Concerns exist regarding the comparability of kaolin activated ACT devices. The current study, therefore, evaluated the agreement of ACT assays using parallel measurements performed on two commonly used devices. Measurements were conducted in a split-sample fashion on both the ACT Plus (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) and i-STAT (Abbott Point of Care, Princeton, NJ) analyzers. Blood samples from 100 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB were assayed at specified time points: before heparinization, following systemic heparinization, after CPB initiation, every 30 minutes during CPB, and following protamine administration. A cutoff value of 400 seconds (s) was used as part of the local protocol. Measurements were compared using t tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, linear regression, and Bland-Altman analyses. Parallel ACT measurements demonstrated a good linear correlation (r = .831, p < .001). The overall median difference between both measurements was significantly different from zero, amounting to 87 (14-189) (p < .001), with limits of agreement of -124 and 333s. The i-STAT-derived ACT values were systematically lower than the ACT Plus values, which was more pronounced during CPB. Fourteen patients received additional heparin during CPB at a median ACT Plus value of 414s, with a concomitant median i-STAT value of 316s. Assuming 308s as the theoretical i-STAT cutoff value based on the linear regression equation and an ACT Plus threshold of 400s, 29 patients would have received additional heparin. Based on these results, kaolin point-of-care ACT devices cannot be used interchangeably. Device-specific predefined target values are warranted to avert heparin overdosing during CPB.

Factors associated with errors in the heparin dose response test: recommendations to improve individualized heparin management in cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: A critical aspect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is to achieve full anticoagulation to prevent thrombosis and consumptive coagulation without using excessive amount of heparin. This can be achieved with heparin dose response (HDR) test in vitro to calculate an individualized heparin bolus to reach a target activated clotting time (ACT) and heparin concentration. However, we often observe that the measured ACT (mACT) with the calculated heparin bolus gives significant errors, both positive (mACT is higher than expected) and negative (mACT is lower), from expected ACT (eACT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 250 patients who underwent cardiac surgery to attain an error distribution of the mACT from eACT with calculated heparin bolus. In addition, it is aimed to identify possible patterns of baseline ACT (bACT), calculated heparin concentration (CHC) and HDR slope that are associated with the significant positive and negative errors. RESULTS: We found that individualized heparin bolus by HDR test is consistently underestimated while it gave a significant number of positive and negative errors. Further analysis indicates that significant negative errors correlate with high bACT and slope and low CHC while significant positive errors with low bACT and slope and high CHC. CONCLUSION: The mACT can be substantially different from eACT. The accuracy of the HDR test appears to be dependent upon bACT, slope, and CHC. Based on our analysis, we provide several recommendations and a flow chart to improve the quality of individualized heparin management on CPB.

Factors influencing activated clotting time following heparin administration for the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVES: Initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for open-heart surgery requires that heparin be administered and reach an adequate value of activated clotting time (ACT). We previously introduced a new heparin formula that considered the preoperative ACT. In this study, we determined other factors affecting ACT. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery using CPB were divided into two groups according to their ACT value after the initial administration of heparin during surgery. ACT above 450 s was defined as "Reach", and this group was compared to the "Short" group with ACT below 450 s. RESULTS: The Reach and Short groups included 334 (64.7%) and 182 (35.3%) cases, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that preoperative heparin use, age ≥ 80 years, New York Heart Association classification 4, white blood cell counts above the higher limit, hematocrit below the lower limit, platelet cell counts below the lower limit, low albumin levels, moderate renal dysfunction, high C-reactive protein levels, high brain natriuretic peptide levels, and moderate deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with the effects of heparin. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 80 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.53, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.41-5.24), New York Heart Association classification 4 (OR = 4.44, 95%CI 1.59-15.35), and platelet count below the lower limit (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.31-0.85) were associated with the effects of heparin. CONCLUSION: Old age, heart failure, and lower platelet counts affected heparin activity. The dose of heparin should be considered in those patients to reach the target ACT.

A Standardized Bolus of 5 000 IU of Heparin Does not Lead to Adequate Heparinization during Non-cardiac Arterial Procedures.

BACKGROUND: In non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP), heparin is administered to prevent arterial thromboembolic complications (ATEC). Heparin has a nonpredictable effect in the individual patient, also known as variation in heparin sensitivity. Various dosing protocols are in use, but the optimal dose is currently still unknown. A standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin is most frequently used by vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists. The activated clotting time (ACT) is an established method to measure the level of anticoagulation, but has, until now, not gained widespread use in NCAP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anticoagulant effect during NCAP of a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin by measuring the ACT. METHODS: In this prospective study, 190 patients undergoing NCAP were enrolled between December 2016 and September 2018. The ACT was measured during open and endovascular/hybrid procedures. All patients received a standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin. The ACT was measured by the Hemostasis Management System Plus (HMS Plus, Medtronic®), before, 5 minutes after administration of heparin, and every 30 minutes thereafter. The primary outcome was periprocedural ACT values measured. Secondary outcomes were ATEC and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: A large individual patient variability in the response to heparin was found. The mean baseline ACT in all patients was 129 ± 18 s., and the mean ACT 5 minutes after the initial bolus of heparin was 191 ± 36 s. After the initial dose of 5 000 IU heparin 60 (33%) and 10 (6%) patients reached an ACT of 200 and 250 s., respectively. Despite the use of heparin, ATEC occurred in 17 patients (9%). The lowest number of ATEC occurred in the group of patients with an ACT between 200 and 250 s. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized bolus of 5 000 IU heparin does not lead to adequate and safe heparinization in non-cardiac arterial procedures. Patient response to heparin shows a large individual variability. Therefore, routine ACT measurements are necessary to ascertain adequate anticoagulation. Further research is needed to investigate if heparin dosing based on the ACT could result in less arterial thromboembolic complications, without increasing hemorrhagic complications.

A comparative analysis of four activated clotting time measurement devices in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: In cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), heparin anticoagulation is monitored by point-of-care measurement of activated clotting time (ACT). The objective of this study was to compare four ACT systems in cardiac surgery in terms of their reproducibility, agreement and potential clinical impact at relevant medical decision points. METHODS: The study included 40 cardiac surgery patients. Samples were taken at five time points before (T1), after heparinization for CPB (T2, T3, T4), and after heparin reversal (T5). The reproducibility, correlation, and differences in ACT values were assessed with two devices from each of the four ACT systems: Instrumentation Laboratory Hemochron Elite (Hmch), Medtronic HMS Plus (HMS), Abbott i-STAT, and Helena Abrazo. Subrange analyses were performed for low ACT values (results from T1, T5) and high ACT values (results from T2, T3, T4). RESULTS: Within-system analysis showed strong linear correlation between paired measurements (R = 0.968-0.993). However, Hmch showed poorer reproducibility with highest proportion of values that exceed a difference of 10% and highest overall standard error of 74 seconds across the measurement range compared to that of the others (range 39-47 seconds, respectively). For inter-system comparison, using Hmch as reference, ACTs were strongly correlated as follows: HMS (R = 0.938), i-STAT (R = 0.911), and Abrazo (R = 0.911). Agreement analysis in the high ACT range showed HMS tended to have higher ACT values with +11% bias over Hmch, whereas i-STAT (-8% bias) and Abrazo (-13% bias) tended to underestimate. Post-protamine ACT results were dependent on device type where Hmch yielded highest post-protamine ACT (+13% higher than baseline) compared to -16% for HMS, -10% for iSTAT and 0% for Abrazo. CONCLUSIONS: Each device had individual reproducibility and biases, which may impact peri-operative heparin management. Careful validation must be undertaken when adopting a different method as decision limits would be affected. Clinicians should also be cautious using ACT as the only indicator for full heparin reversal.

Application of goal-directed therapy for the use of concentrated antithrombin for heparin resistance during cardiac surgery.

The maintenance of anticoagulation in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass is dependent upon a number of factors, including heparin concentration and adequate antithrombin activity. Inadequate anticoagulation increases the risk of thrombosis and jeopardizes both vascular and extracorporeal circuit integrity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a goal-directed approach for the use of antithrombin in patients who were resistant to heparin. Following institutional review board approval, data were obtained from quality improvement records. A goal-directed protocol for antithrombin was established based upon heparin dosing (400 IU kg-1 body weight) and achieving an activated clotting time of ⩾500 seconds prior to cardiopulmonary bypass. Two groups of patients were identified as those receiving antithrombin and those not receiving antithrombin. Outcome measures included activated clotting time values and transfusion rates. Consecutive patients (n = 140) were included in the study with 10 (7.1%) in the antithrombin group. The average antithrombin dose was 1,029.0 ± 164.5 IU and all patients had restoration to the activated clotting time levels. Patients in the antithrombin group were on preoperative heparin therapy (80.0% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.001). Prior to cardiopulmonary bypass the activated clotting time values were lower in the antithrombin group (417.7 ± 56.1 seconds vs. 581.1 ± 169.8 seconds, p = 0.003). Antithrombin patients had a lower heparin sensitivity index (0.55 ± 0.17 vs. 1.05 ± 0.44 seconds heparin-1 IU kg-1, p = 0.001), received more total heparin (961.3 ± 158.5 IU kg-1 vs. 677.5 ± 199.0 IU kg-1, p = 0.001), more cardiopulmonary bypass heparin (22,500 ± 10,300 IU vs. 12,100 ± 13,200 IU, p = 0.016), and more protamine (5.4 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 1.1 mg kg-1, p = 0.003). The intraoperative transfusion rate was higher in the antithrombin group (70.0% vs. 35.4%, p = 0.035), but no differences were seen postoperatively. Utilization of a goal-directed algorithm for the administration of antithrombin for the treatment of heparin resistance is effective in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Differential Effects of Clopidogrel With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard in acute coronary syndrome but confers a bleeding risk. To compare effects of clopidogrel single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with clopidogrel-based DAPT on hemostatic system activation we conducted a randomized clinical trial in 44 volunteers (clopidogrel (d1: 600 mg, d2-6: 150 mg) ± aspirin (100 mg)). Multiple electrode aggregometry-adenosine diphosphate (MEA-ADP) and MEA-arachidonic acid (MEA-AA) triggered aggregometry, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), beta thromboglobulin, p-selectin, thromboxane B2 , d-Dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2), and a phospholipid-dependent clotting time were measured in venous blood. Changes are described by mean differences (Δmean (95% confidence interval (CI)) or geometric mean ratios (95% CI)). DAPT and SAPT comparably and significantly decreased MEA-ADP at 2 hours (-60% vs. -63%; P = 0.35, Δmean -4.9, 95% CI -15.4 to 5.5). At 24 hours (-59% vs. -47%, P = 0.04, Δmean -11.1, 95% CI -21.7 to -0.4]) and 8 days (-61% vs. -53%, P = 0.04, Δmean -11.3, 95% CI -22.0 to -0.6). Both treatments significantly reduced VASP and MEA-AA after 2 hours and 8 days. DAPT inhibited MEA-AA significantly stronger at 2 hours (-77% vs. -30%; P < 0.0001, Δmean -39.6, 95% CI -54.2 to -25.0), at 24 hours (-80% vs. -27%, P < 0.0001, Δmean -47.8, 95% CI -62.3 to -33.3), and 8 days (-79% vs. -27%, P < 0.0001, Δmean -48.9, 95% CI -62.5 to -35.4). Neither treatment significantly influenced beta thromboglobulin or p-selectin. DAPT abolished and SAPT reduced thromboxane B2 after 24 hours and 8 days. The d-Dimer was reduced by DAPT (0.94, 95% CI 0.89-1.00, P = 0.04) at 2 hours but not after 24 hours and 8 days. SAPT did not decrease d-Dimer. Neither treatment affected f1.2. DAPT and SAPT comparably affect platelet and coagulation activation in venous blood.