Lumpectomy followed by radiation improves survival in HER2 positive and triple-negative breast cancer with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared to mastectomy alone.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to compare the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS in patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 breast cancer (HER2+ BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in relation to the amount of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) after locoregional management by either mastectomy without radiation or lumpectomy and whole-breast radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of HER2+ BC and TNBC patients' charts and histopathology slides with clinical stage of T1-T2 N0 who presented at our facility between January 2009 and December 2019. Locoregional treatment included either mastectomy without RT (M) or lumpectomy with RT (L+R). TILs were assessed by three pathologists using the guidelines of the 2014 TILs working group. A competing risk model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to analyze correlations between TILs levels and clinical outcome. RESULTS: We reviewed 211 patients' charts. Of them, 190 proceeded to the final analysis. Patients were split into groups of "low TILs" and "high TILs" based on a 50% TILs cut-off. Of them 26% had high TILs, 48% received RT, 97% received chemotherapy, all HER2+ BC patients received HER2-directed therapy and all HER2+ BC that were also hormone receptor positive (HR+) received endocrine therapy (ET). In patient with low TILs, L+R did not improve outcomes compared to M. Moreover, patients with high TILs had a significant improvement of their DFS and OS with L+R when compared to M. CONCLUSION: The results of our study reflect that a selected group of HER2+ BC and TNBC with elevated TILs, L+R is associated with improvement of 5-year DFS and 5-year OS.

Disparities in male versus female oncologic outcomes following bladder preservation: A population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: In surgical series of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), women have higher recurrence rates, disease progression, and mortality following radical cystectomy than men. Similar reports of oncologic differences between men and women following trimodality therapy (TMT) are rare. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in overall survival (OS) between sexes receiving TMT. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with clinical stage T2-T4aN0 M0 MIBC between 2004-2016. We considered patients to have received TMT if they received 55 Gy in 20 fractions or 59.4-70.2 Gy of radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy following a transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to determine whether sex was associated with risk of mortality. In addition to OS, we calculated relative survival (RS) to adjust for the fact that females generally survive longer than males. RESULTS: Of the patients, 1960 underwent TMT and had survival data. Less than one quarter were female. In the first year following treatment, women had worse OS and RS than men (p = 0.093 and p = 0.030, respectively). However, overall and relative survival differences between sexes were not statistically significantly different in Years 2 and later. Unlike with OS, the RS between sexes remained significant at 9 years; in multivariable analysis based on RS, women were 43% more likely to die than men (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women had a higher initial risk of death than men in the first year following TMT. However, long-term survival between sexes was similar. TMT is an important treatment option in both men and women seeking bladder preservation.

Lower Genital Tract Melanomas: Staging, Predictors of Outcome, and New Therapeutic Options.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Identification of predictors of survival of patients with lower genital tract melanoma (LGTM) and evaluation of the effectiveness of immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of twenty women with LGTM were retrospectively collected. Survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival distributions were analyzed using the Log rank test. RESULTS: Twenty patients with LGTM (6 vaginal/14 vulvar) were evaluated. Factors significantly affecting Five-year OS was the stage of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 2017) (I+II: 55.6% vs. III+IV: 25.9%; p=0.030) and the T-Stage (I+II: 100% vs. III+IV: 7.5%; p=0.280). Factors negatively affecting Five-year PFS was T-Stage >II (p=0.005), AJCC stage >II (p<0.001), depth of tumor infiltration >3 mm (p=0.008), nodal involvement (p=0.013), distant disease (p=0.002), and resection margins <10 mm (p=0.024). Nine patients received immunotherapy [median duration of response (DOR)=4 months]. Three patients received immuno- and radiation therapy (median DOR of 5 months). Two patients received T-VEC, only one responded. CONCLUSION: Surgery has a therapeutic effect in early stage LGTM. Advanced stages may be treated with immunotherapy, radiation therapy, a combination of both, and oncolytic viral immunotherapy.

Survival and function following pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy in Wales: a twelve-year case series.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer can cause significant morbidity and late toxicity. Pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy can achieve adequate surgical margins, but data on survival and functional outcome are limited, especially in Wales. This study aimed to describe mortality, morbidity and functional outcome following pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy in a Welsh population. METHOD: This study was a retrospective case note review of pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy cases in Wales over 12 years. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy; all but one underwent gastric pull-up. Median survival and disease-free survival were 17 months (range, 2-53 months) and 14 months. Censored 3-month, 1-year and 3-year survival was 93, 71 and 50 per cent, respectively. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading of long-term dysphagia was 1 in 58 per cent, 2 in 33 per cent and 3 in 8 per cent, and 87.5 per cent achieved a 'moderate' or 'good' voice rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate favourable survival and reasonable functional outcome following pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy, suggesting pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy should be considered in all appropriate surgical candidates.

Regional deep hyperthermia in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in poor prognosis patients with brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess for the first time, the role of regional deep hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy and systemic therapy in patients with poor prognosis of brain metastases (GPI ≤ 2.5). METHODS: Patients with confirmed cerebral metastases and classified as GPI score ≤ 2.5 were included in this prospective study. Pretreatment stratification was defined as patients with 0-1 GPI score (Group A) and patients with 1.5-2.5 GPI score (Group B). HT was applied twice a week, 60 min per session, during RT by regional capacitive device (HY-DEEP 600WM system) at 13.56 MHz radiofrequency. RESULTS: Between June 2015 and June 2017, 15 patients and a total of 49 brain metastases were included in the protocol. All patients received all HT sessions as planned. RT and systemic therapy were also completed as prescribed. Tolerance to treatment was excellent and no toxicity was registered. Patients with HT effective treatment time longer than the median (W90time > 88%) showed better actuarial PFS at 6 and 12 months (100% and 66.7%, respectively) compared to those with less HT effective treatment time (50% and 0%, respectively) (p < 0.031). Median OS was 6 months (range 1-36 months). Stratification by GPI score showed a median OS of 3 months (CI 95% 2.49-3.51) in Group A and 8.0 months (CI 95% 5.15-10.41) in Group B (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Regional hyperthermia is a feasible and safe technique to be used in combination with RT in brain metastases patients, improving PFS and survival in poor prognostic brain metastasis patients.

Clinical features of head and neck cancer patients with brain metastases: A retrospective study of 88 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Brain metastases (BM) arising from head and neck cancer (HNC) are rare and not well characterized. This study aims to describe the clinicopathological features, treatments, prognostic factors, and survival in HNC patients with BM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-thyroid HNC patients referred to BC Cancer from 1998 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for BM. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were used to assess post-BM survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Out of 9432 HNC patients, 88 patients developed BM (0.9%, median follow-up 3.4 years). On average, the BM were diagnosed 18.5 months after the primary diagnosis and tended to arise after distant metastases to extracranial sites (85%) such as the lungs (78%). At BM presentation, 84% were symptomatic and two thirds had a poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 2, 68%). The median post-BM survival was 2.5 months (95% CI 2.1-3.3 months). On multivariable analysis, management of BM with radiotherapy (RT) alone (3.3 months, 95% CI 2.3-4.6, p = 0.005) and RT with surgery (4.4 months, 95% CI 2.8-6.9, p < 0.001) was associated with longer survival compared to best supportive care alone (1.4 months, 95% CI 1.0-2.0 months). Age, sex, performance status, sub-localization of the primary HNC, presence of extracranial metastases, and number of intracranial metastases were not associated with post-BM survival (all p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date in BM from HNC. BM occur late in the course of HNC and carry a poor prognosis. Treatment with intracranial radiotherapy both with and without surgery was associated with improved survival.

Sarcomatoid Carcinoma in the Head and Neck: A Population-Based Analysis of Outcome and Survival.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize sarcomatoid cell carcinoma (SaC) in head and neck, explore the value of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy, and build a nomogram to predict the prognosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: In total, 559 patients diagnosed with head and neck SaC from 2004 to 2015 were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. All the cases were divided into training (N = 313) and validation (N = 246) cohorts according to the year of diagnosis. The cases were analyzed on the age, site, sex, race, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, RT, and chemotherapy. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among disease-related categories. The parameters significantly correlated with CSS were used to construct a nomogram. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis showed that age, T stage, N stage, and M stage were significantly correlated with CSS and OS. Overall, RT was correlated with improved CSS for Stage T3-4 and Stage N1-3. The subgroup analysis showed that RT was correlated with CSS in the Stage N1-3 patients after surgery while chemotherapy indicated an improved survival for Stage T3-4 and N1-3 patients without surgery. The prognostic nomogram was constructed and had a powerful discriminatory ability with the C-index of CSS: 0.711. CONCLUSION: Late-stage head and neck SaC patients unfit for surgery need comprehensive treatment based on chemotherapy, and patients with node metastasis require adjuvant RT after surgery. Generally, RT might improve the survival of late-stage patients. A reliable and powerful nomogram was established that can provide an individual prediction of CSS for head and neck SaC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E489-E499, 2021.

Association of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Overall Survival in Women With Metastatic Endometrial Cancer.

Importance: Although primary debulking surgery (PDS) is often considered the criterion standard for treatment of stage IV endometrial cancer, PDS is associated with significant morbidity and poor survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been proposed as an alternative treatment strategy. Objective: To determine the use of and outcomes associated with NACT for women with stage IV endometrial cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the National Cancer Database to identify women with stage IV endometrial cancer treated from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. The cohort was limited to women aged 70 years or younger with minimal comorbidity (comorbidity score = 0). Women were stratified based on receipt of NACT or PDS. A propensity score analysis with inverse probability weighting was performed to balance the clinical characteristics of the groups. Survival was examined using flexible parametric Royston-Parmer models to account for time-varying hazards associated with use of NACT. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed, as was a per-protocol (PP) analysis that included only women who received treatment with both chemotherapy and surgery (in either sequence). Data were analyzed from March 15, 2018, to July 20, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of NACT and overall survival. Results: Of a total of 4890 women (median age, 60 years [interquartile range, 54-65 years]) with stage IV endometrial cancer, NACT was used in 952 women (19.5%). Use of NACT increased from 106 of 661 women (16.0%; 95% CI, 13.2%-18.8%) in 2010 to 224 of 938 women (23.9%; 95% CI, 21.2%-26.6%) in 2015 (P < .001). In a multivariate model, more recent year of diagnosis (risk ratio [RR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21-1.79 for 2015 vs 2010), stage IVB disease (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.67 for stage IVB vs IVA), and serous histology (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13-1.69 for serous vs endometrioid histology) were associated with use of NACT. In a propensity score-balanced cohort, use of NACT displayed a time-varying association with survival. In the ITT analysis, use of NACT was associated with decreased mortality for the first 3 months after diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] at 2 months, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99). After 4 months, the survival curves crossed, and receipt of NACT was associated with increased mortality (HR at 6 months, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39). In the PP analysis, use of NACT was associated with decreased mortality for the first 8 months after diagnosis (HR at 6 months, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.98). After 9 months, the survival curves crossed, and receipt of NACT was associated with increased mortality (HR at 12 months, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04-1.43). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that women treated with PDS are at increased risk of early death but have a more favorable long-term prognosis. In contrast, results suggest that women treated with NACT, particularly if they ultimately undergo surgery, may have superior survival in the short term. Based on these findings, NACT may be appropriate for select patients with advanced uterine serous carcinoma.

Effect of radiation therapy on overall survival following subtotal resection of adult pilocytic astrocytoma.

OBJECTIVE: Pilocytic astrocytoma (PCA) is a low-grade glioma that primarily presents in children, but can also present in adulthood. Ideal primary treatment for PCA is gross total resection. However, for patients who are only able to undergo subtotal resection, the optimal course of post-operative therapy remains unclear. We investigated the association of patient characteristics and radiation therapy (RT) with overall survival specifically for adult PCA patients who underwent subtotal tumor resection. METHODS: Information on adult patients (age ≥18 years old) who underwent subtotal PCA resection between 2004 and 2016 was collected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to determine factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 451 patients were identified. The mean age of our patient cohort was 36.8 years old, and the majority of patients (83.4%) did not receive RT following subtotal PCA resection. Overall median survival was >93.8 months. On multivariate analysis, patients who were older at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.06, p < 0.01), black (HR = 2.35, CI = 1.05-5.23, p = 0.037), had a Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score ≥ 1 (HR = 2.27, CI = 1.00-5.14, p = 0.049), or received RT during their initial treatment (HR = 3.77, CI = 1.77-8.03, p < 0.01) had a significantly higher risk of death following subtotal PCA resection. CONCLUSION: Post-operative RT was associated with a significantly higher risk of death among adults who underwent subtotal PCA resection. Our findings provide support for further inquiry into the efficacy of RT within this patient population.

Comparison of Surgical Resection and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Initial Treatment of Brain Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common brain malignancy and a common cause of death in cancer patients. However, the relative outcome-related advantages and disadvantages of surgical resection (SR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the initial treatment of BM are controversial. METHOD: We systematically reviewed the English language literature up to March 2020 to compare the efficacy of SR and SRS in the initial treatment of BM. We identified cohort studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases and conducted a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Twenty cohort studies involving 1,809 patients were included. Local control did not significantly differ between the SR and SRS groups overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-1.64, p = 0.92; I2 = 54%, p = 0.03) or in subgroup analyses of SR plus SRS vs. SRS alone, SR plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) versus SRS plus WBRT, or SR plus WBRT versus SRS alone. Distant intracranial control did not significantly differ between the SR and SRS groups overall (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.38-1.60, p = 0.49; I2 = 61%, p = 0.03) or in subgroup analyses of SR plus SRS versus SRS alone or SR plus WBRT versus SRS alone. In addition, overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ in the SR and SRS groups (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.27, p = 0.57; I2 = 47%, p = 0.09) or in subgroup analyses of SR plus SRS versus SRS alone, SR plus WBRT versus SRS alone or SR plus WBRT versus SRS plus WBRT. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment of BM with SRS may offer comparable local and distant intracranial control to SR in patients with single or solitary BM. OS did not significantly differ between the SR and SRS groups in people with single or solitary BM.

Long-term outcomes of patients in different histological subtypes of primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma: A single-center experience with 71 cases.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and management approaches in different histological subtypes of primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma (NPAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 71 patients with NPAC at our institution between 1984 and 2016 were reviewed, including adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in 43 patients, mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) in 17 patients, and primary traditional adenocarcinoma (AC) in 11 patients. 37 patients received primary radiotherapy and 34 patients underwent primary surgery. RESULTS: The median time of follow-up was 77 months. The 5-year overall survival rate (OS), locoregional failure-free survival rate (LRFFS) and distant metastasis failure-free survival rate (DFFS) were 69.9%, 67.1% and 77.9%, respectively. Patients who received combined modality therapy had better 5-year OS (73.7% vs 66.2%, p = 0.065) and LRFFS (73.1% vs 64.5%, p = 0.047) than patients receiving single modality therapy. Regarding the different histological subtypes, the survival rates of patients with ACC undergoing primary radiotherapy and primary surgery were similar (5-year OS 82.3% vs 68.8%, LRFFS 70.0% vs 70.8%, p＞0.05). As to patients with MEC and AC, those who underwent primary surgery achieved better 5-year OS (75.6% vs 45.5%, p = 0.001) and LRFFS (70.6%% vs 57.1%, p = 0.014) than those who received primary radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses indicated that histological subtypes and radiotherapy technique were independent factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal treatment policy for NPAC remained the combination of radiotherapy and surgery. For patients with ACC, radiotherapy could be considered as the primary treatment. Surgery was suggested to be the primary treatment in patients with MEC and AC.

The impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy on the survival of pancreatic cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has become an essential part of cancer treatment after showing great efficacy in various malignancies. However, its effectiveness in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), especially in resectable pancreatic cancer, has not been studied. The primary objective of this study is to compare the OS impact of immunotherapy between PDAC patients who receive neoadjuvant immunotherapy and patients who receive adjuvant immunotherapy. The secondary objective is to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy and chemoradiation by performing subset analyses of these two groups. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to examine the effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy and chemoradiation on the OS of the patients. The multivariable analysis was adjusted for essential factors such as the age at diagnosis, sex, race, education, income, place of living insurance status, hospital type, comorbidity score, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 526 patients received immunotherapy. Among whom, 408/526 (77.57%) received neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and the remaining 118/526 (22.43%) received adjuvant immunotherapy. There was no significant difference in OS between neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy (HR: 1.06, CI: 0.79-1.41; p < 0.714) in the multivariable analysis. In the univariate neoadjuvant treatment subset analysis, immunotherapy was associated with significantly improved OS compared to no immunotherapy (HR: 0.88, CI: 0.78-0.98; p < 0.026). This benefit disappeared in the multivariable analysis. However, after patients were stratified by educational level, the multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy was associated with significantly improved OS (HR: 0.86, CI: 0.74-0.99; p < 0.04) compared to no immunotherapy only in patients with high-level of education, but not in patients with low-level of education. CONCLUSION: In this study, no difference in the OS between patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and patients who received adjuvant immunotherapy was noticed. Future studies comparing neoadjuvant adjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and chemoradiation are needed.

The impact of immunotherapy on the survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who received definitive surgery of the pancreatic tumor: a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has paved the way for new therapeutic opportunities in cancer but has failed to show any efficacy in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and its therapeutic role remains unclear. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, RT, and chemoradiation on the overall survival (OS) of PDAC patients who received definitive surgery of the tumor using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: Patients with PDAC who received definitive surgery of the pancreatic tumor and were diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 from the NCDB were identified. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess the survival difference between patients who received chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and chemoradiation therapy plus immunotherapy and their counterparts who only receive these treatments without immunotherapy. The multivariable analysis was adjusted for age of diagnosis, race, sex, place of living, income, education, treatment facility type, insurance status, year of diagnosis, and treatment types such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy. RESULTS: In total, 63,154 PDAC patients who received definitive surgery of the tumor were included in the analysis. Among the 63,154 patients, 636 (1.01%) received immunotherapy. Among patients who received chemotherapy (21,355), and chemoradiation (21,875), 157/21,355 (0.74%) received chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, and 451/21,875 (2.06%) received chemoradiation plus immunotherapy. Patients who received chemoradiation plus immunotherapy had significantly improved median OS compared to patients who only received chemoradiation with an absolute median OS benefit of 5.7 [29.31 vs. 23.66, p < 0.0001] months. In the multivariable analysis, patients who received immunotherapy had significantly improved OS compared to patients who did not receive immunotherapy (HR: 0.900; CI: 0.814-0.995; P < 0.039). Patients who received chemoradiation plus immunotherapy had significantly improved OS compared to their counterparts who only received chemoradiation without immunotherapy (HR: 0.852 CI: 0.757-0.958; P < 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the addition of immunotherapy to chemoradiation therapy was associated with significantly improved OS in PDAC patients who received definitive surgery. The study warrants further future clinical trials of immunotherapy in PDAC.

Clear Cell Meningioma: A Clinicopathologic Study of a Rare Meningioma Subtype in 35 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Clear cell meningioma (CCM) is a rare histologic variant, accounting for only 0.2%-0.8% of all meningiomas. Given their relative infrequency, few cases have been reported. We have presented one of the largest series of patients with intracranial CCM and reported the treatments and outcomes of these patients. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven CCM from 2003 to 2018 were identified for inclusion in the present study. Relevant clinical and radiographic data were obtained via retrospective review and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to compare overall and progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients had undergone surgical resection for CCM, including 18 women and 17 men, with a mean age of 59.3 years. Gross total resection was achieved in 22 patients (62.9%), and 11 patients (31.4%) had received adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy. Tumors recurred in 17 patients (48.6%), with a mean time to recurrence of 31.3 months. The mean postoperative follow-up was 66.3 months. On multivariable analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy and gross total tumor resection were both independently associated with prolonged progression-free survival (P < 0.033), although not with overall survival (P >0.274). CONCLUSIONS: The data from the present series of 35 patients with CCM have shown distinct contrasts to previous series, with an older mean age and a nearly 1:1 male/female ratio. Although gross total resection and adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy were both independently associated with longer progression-free survival for patients with CCM, tumor recurrence has remained a challenge in the treatment of these patients.

Outcome of stem cell transplantation for Waldenström's macroglobulinemia: analysis of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JSHCT) Lymphoma Working Group.

The role of stem cell transplantation (SCT) for patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) remains undetermined. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the outcome of autologous and allogeneic SCT for patients with WM using the registry database of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Forty-six patients receiving autologous and 31 receiving allogeneic SCT were analyzed. The allogeneic SCT group included more patients with advanced disease status at transplant and received more lines of chemotherapy. The cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year were 30.0% (95% CI, 14.7-46.9%) in the allogeneic SCT and 0% in the autologous SCT group. The estimated 3-year overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival rates were 84.5% (95% CI, 66.0-93.4%) and 70.8% (95% CI, 53.0-82.9%) in the autologous SCT group, and 52.2% (95% CI, 32.5-68.6%) and 45.0% (95% CI, 26.3-62.0%) in the allogeneic SCT group. No patients died after the first 2 years following allogeneic SCT. In univariate analyses, disease status at SCT was significantly associated with PFS in autologous SCT, and with OS and PFS in allogeneic SCT. These results suggest that both autologous and allogeneic SCT have each potential role in WM. Allogeneic SCT is more curative for WM, but is associated with high NRM.

Long term follow-up and outcomes in adult patients with thalamic gliomas.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the optimal treatment and prognosis of thalamic glioma in adult patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the adult patients with thalamic glioma admitted to our hospital from May 2005 to September 2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment: surgery-based combined treatment and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-based treatment. Univariate chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify independent factors for the treatment modality. A log-rank test, adjusting for propensity score, was used to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients between the two groups. RESULTS: Fifty-eight adult patients with thalamic gliomas were included in the analysis. Of them, 31 were treated with surgery-based treatment, and 27 were treated with IMRT-based treatment. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients between the two groups were not significantly different (median OS 16.0 (range 1.0-163.0) months vs. 10.0 (range 1.0-118.0) months, p = 0.344 and median PFS 10.0 (range 1.0-163.0) months vs. 6.0 (range 1.0-118.0) months, p = 0.464, respectively) even after adjusting for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The OS and PFS of adult patients with thalamic glioma were not significantly different between patients in the surgical group and in the IMRT group. IMRT might be an acceptable alternative to surgery for adult patients with unresectable thalamic glioma.

Impact of different adjuvant treatment approaches on survival in stage III endometrial cancer: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III endometrial cancer (EC) have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes. After surgery, adjuvant therapy is recommended with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), chemotherapy (CT) or both EBRT and CT. Recent trials suggest that EBRT + CT is superior to EBRT or CT alone but also results in more toxicity. We have compared the outcome of different adjuvant treatments in a population-based cohort to identify subgroups that benefit most from EBRT + CT. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with FIGO stage III EC and treated with surgery in 2005-2016 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); associations with adjuvant treatment were analysed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 1241 eligible patients, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-2.52) and EBRT alone (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.05-1.79). In stage IIIC, there was a significant benefit of EBRT + CT compared with CT or EBRT alone. In stage IIIA-B, there was no difference between EBRT + CT or EBRT alone. In endometrioid EC (EEC) and carcinosarcomas, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT or EBRT alone. For uterine serous cancers, there was no survival benefit of EBRT + CT over CT. In all analysis by stage and histology, any adjuvant treatment was superior to no adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, adjuvant EBRT + CT was associated with improved OS compared with CT or EBRT alone in FIGO stage IIIC EC, EEC and carcinosarcoma. This suggests that application of EBRT + CT in stage III should be further stratified according to these subgroups.

Comparison of combination therapies in the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Induction chemotherapy followed by irreversible electroporation vs radiofrequency ablation.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains a challenge for current treatments. Local destructive therapies, such as irreversible electroporation (IRE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), were used more and more frequently in the treatment of LAPC. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of IRE with RFA in patients with LAPC. METHODS: From August 2015 to August 2017, 58 LAPC patients after IRE or RFA therapy, which was performed through open approach, were retrospectively reviewed. The survival outcomes after IRE (36 patients) and RFA (18 patients) were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: Before PSM analysis, IRE after the induction chemotherapy resulted in significant higher overall survival (OS) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates to RFA (2-year OS, 53.5% vs 30.8%, P = .013; 2-year PFS, 28.4% vs 12.1%, P = .043). After PSM analysis, compared with RFA, the survival benefit of IRE was even more obvious, (2-year OS, 53.5% vs 27.0%, P = .010; 2-year PFS, 28.4% vs 6.4%, P = .018). For patients with tumor larger than 4 cm, IRE resulted in comparable OS and PFS between RFA and IRE while IRE also achieved better long-term OS to RFA for those with tumor smaller than 4 cm. Multivariate analysis illustrated that IRE was a favorable prognostic factor in terms of OS and PFS in patients with LAPC. CONCLUSIONS: IRE after induction chemotherapy is superior to RFA after induction chemotherapy for treating LAPC patients while these two therapies have comparable efficacy for tumors which were larger than 4 cm.

Perioperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for retroperitoneal sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background There is no clear evidence on whether radiotherapy (RT) improves treatment result in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL databases. Data were retrieved from published comparatives studies in patients with RPS undergoing surgery alone or RT plus surgery. The primary endpoints were the 5-year OS and the median OS. The secondary endpoints were the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the R0-resection rate. Continuous outcomes were calculated by means of weighted mean difference (WMD). Results Ten out of 374 articles were analyzed. The median OS and the 5-year survival were significantly increased in patients treated with RT and surgery, compared to patients treated with surgery alone (p < 0.00001, p < 0.001). Median RFS was significantly increased in patients treated with either preoperative (p < 0.001) or postoperative (p = 0.001) RT compared to patients that underwent surgery alone. Finally, median R0-resection rate was similar between the two groups (p = 0.56). Conclusion RT along with radical surgery could be the standard of care in at least a subgroup of patients with RPS.

Treatment and survival of primary intracranial germ cell tumors: a population-based study using SEER database.

INTRODUCTION: Primary intracranial germ cell tumors are rare neoplasms derived from gonadal cells. They are categorized as germinoma, non-germinomatous germ cell tumor (NGCCT), or teratoma, with the latter two sparking controversy regarding the role of different treatment strategies. We provide the largest multicenter analysis of treatment outcomes for iGCTs to date. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database were used to record patient demographics, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Cox proportional hazards model and multiple comparisons for the Logrank test with Sidak correction was applied to compare the different treatment regimens and survival. RESULTS: 1043 iGCT cases were divided into three cohorts of Germinoma, Malignant Teratoma (MT), and NGGCT. The mean age was 17.7 years for germinoma, 9.5 years for MT, and 14.4 years for NGGCT groups. Males comprised 77% of overall patient population. For Germinomas, both biopsy (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.6) and resection (HR = 14.1) had significantly worse survival outcomes compared to solo radiation therapy, with no difference between radiation and chemotherapy. For MT, no treatment combination had significantly different survival outcomes compared to resection alone. For NGGCTs, resection + chemotherapy + radiotherapy (HR = 0.012) and resection + chemotherapy (HR = 0.0049) had significantly better survival compared to resection alone. CONCLUSION: In germinomas, radiotherapy alone had superior survival outcomes compared to biopsy and resection, but no change in survival when compared to chemotherapy alone. Addition of radiotherapy or chemotherapy did not improve survival in MTs when compared to resection alone. Adding chemotherapy in NGGCT patients undergoing resection improved survival compared to resection alone.