The effect of mirror therapy in the rehabilitation of flexor tendon injuries after primary surgical repair.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of mirror therapy and to provide a clinical basis for better functional recovery in the rehabilitation of patients with flexor tendon injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were included and randomly divided between two groups: mirror therapy and conventional treatment. A physical therapy program consisting of whirlpool, ultrasound and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was applied to both groups. In the mirror therapy group, flexor tendon gliding, blocking exercises, joint range of motion and resistance exercises were performed with the healthy hand via a mirror. In the conventional treatment group, the same exercises were performed with the affected hand without mirror. This treatment was continued for 12 sessions over 4 weeks. Joint range of motion, handgrip strength, pain, functionality, dexterity and kinesiophobia were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: More improvement was observed in the mirror therapy group in terms of pain on visual analog scale, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Hand Function Index and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores (p = 0.025, p = 0.004, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between groups for the other parameters (Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale, Purdue Pegboard test, total active range movement, or handgrip strength: p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that mirror therapy in postoperative rehabilitation of flexor tendon injuries is more effective than conventional in terms of reducing the severity of pain and restoring hand function.

Mirror Therapy for the Management of Phantom Limb Pain: A Single- Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Phantom limb pain (PLP) can have devastating consequences, affecting up to 90% of amputees. PLP is associated with analgesia dependence and impaired quality of life. Mirror therapy (MT) is a novel treatment that has been applied in other pain syndromes. We prospectively evaluated MT in the management of PLP. METHODS: A prospective study of patients recruited between 2008 and 2020 who underwent unilateral major limb amputation, with a healthy contralateral limb. Participants were invited to attend weekly MT sessions. Pain in the 7 days prior to each MT session was scored on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS: 0-10 mm) and the short form McGill pain questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety eight patients (68 males and 30 females) aged 17-89 years were recruited over 12 years. Forty four percent of patients had amputations due to peripheral vascular disease. Over an average of 2.5 sessions, the final treatment score on the VAS scale was 2.6 (standard deviation ± 3.0) with a reduction of 4.5 points on VAS score. As a comparison using the short form McGill pain questionnaire scoring system, the average final treatment score was 3.2 (± 5.0) with 91% overall improvement. CONCLUSIONS: MT is a very powerful and effective intervention for PLP. It is an exciting addition to the armory of vascular surgeons in the management of this condition.

Is mirror therapy associated with progressive muscle relaxation more effective than mirror therapy alone in reducing phantom limb pain in patients with lower limb amputation?

Mirror therapy is a widely used treatment for phantom limb pain (PLP) relief in patients with limb loss. Less common is progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), used mostly in other medical conditions (psychological, terminal cancer pain, etc). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a mirror therapy preceded by PMR intervention compared to mirror therapy preceded by unguided generic relaxation-mirror therapy in patients with lower limb amputation suffering from PLP. This pilot study was a single-blind, controlled, randomized trial. Thirty lower limb amputees suffering from PLP were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups respectively undergoing a PMR-mirror therapy rehabilitative intervention, generic relaxation-mirror therapy, and conventional physiotherapy (ConvPT). Selected items from Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were used to test the pain features at the beginning and 1 week after 3 weeks of intervention. A decrease of about 65% was found in the rate and duration of PLP at the PEQ in PMR-mirror therapy with respect to generic relaxation-mirror therapy (about 30%) and ConvPT (about 6%). A decrease of about 90% in intensity (worst and average) of PLP in PMR-mirror therapy when compared to generic relaxation-mirror therapy (about 45%) and ConvPT (about 20%) was found at the BPI. We preliminary concluded, albeit with limitations due to the small sample of patients, that mirror therapy can improve PLP when associated with PMR. Further studies are required to confirm that PMR could be an effective technique for more successful PLP management.

Three Ways to Improve Arm Function in the Chronic Phase After Stroke by Robotic Priming Combined With Mirror Therapy, Arm Training, and Movement-Oriented Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of bilateral robotic priming combined with mirror therapy (R-mirr) vs bilateral robotic priming combined with bilateral arm training (R-bilat), relative to the control approach of bilateral robotic priming combined with movement-oriented training (R-mov) in patients with stroke. DESIGN: A single-blind, preliminary, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Four outpatient rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients with stroke and mild to moderate motor impairment (N=63). INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 6 weeks of clinic-based R-mirr, R-bilat, or R-mov for 90 min/d, 3 d/wk, plus a transfer package at home for 5 d/wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity subscale (FMA-UE), ABILHAND, and Stroke Impact Scale v3.0 scores before, immediately after, and 3 months after treatment as well as lateral pinch strength and accelerometry before and immediately after treatment. RESULTS: The posttest results favored R-mirr over R-bilat and R-mov on the FMA-UE score (P<.05). Follow-up analysis revealed that significant improvement in FMA-UE score was retained at the 3-month follow-up in the R-mirr over R-bilat or R-mov (P<.05). Significant improvements were not observed in the R-mirr over R-bilat and R-mov on other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Between-group differences were only detected for the primary outcome, FMA-UE. R-mirr was more effective at enhancing upper limb motor improvement, and the effect has the potential to be maintained at 3 months of follow-up.

Assessment of efficiency of mirror therapy in preventing phantom limb pain in patients undergoing below-knee amputation surgery-a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a major cause of physical limitation and disability accounting for about 85% of amputated patients. Mirror therapy is used as a therapeutic modality for patients with phantom limb pain. Primary objective was to study the incidence of PLP at 6 months following below-knee amputation between the mirror therapy group and control group. METHODS: Patients posted for below-knee amputation surgery were randomized into two groups. Patients allocated to group M received mirror therapy in post-operative period. Two sessions of therapy were given per day for 7 days and each session lasted for 20 min. Patients who developed pain from the missing portion of the amputated limb were considered to have PLP. All patients were followed up for six months and the time of occurrence of PLP and intensity of the pain were recorded among other demographic factors. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients completed the study after recruitment. The demographic parameters were comparable between the two groups. Overall incidence of phantom limb pain was significantly higher in the control group (Group C) when compared to the mirror therapy (Group M) group [Group M = 7 (11.7%) vs Group C = 17 (28.3%); p = 0.022]. Intensity of PLP measured on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was significantly lower at 3 months in Group M compared to Group C among patients who developed PLP [NRS - median (Inter quartile range): Group M 5 (4,5) vs Group C 6 (5,6); p 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Mirror therapy reduced the incidence of phantom limb pain when administered pre-emptively in patients undergoing amputation surgeries. The severity of the pain was also found to be lower at 3 months in patients who received pre-emptive mirror therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This prospective study was registered in the clinical trial registry of India. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2020/07/026488.

Modulation of mTORC1 and IL-6 following mirror therapy and pregabalin in complex regional pain syndrome type 1.

Aim: The study was designed to evaluate the modulation of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and IL-6 genes following the use of mirror therapy (MT) and pregabalin in complex regional pain syndrome type-1 patients. Materials & methods: Two groups of 20 patients: MT group received MT and pregabalin, control therapy group received pregabalin. Neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI), numeric rating scale - pain, modified motor activity log, SF-12 questionnaire for quality of life and IL-6 and mTORC1 expression were evaluated. Results: Group MT demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in NPSI burning, NPSI allodynia and numeric rating scale pain scores, modified motor activity log and SF-12 scores. Significant downregulation of mTORC1 and IL-6 observed in both. Conclusion: MT is a significant adjunct to pregabalin in improving motor function, quality of life and alleviating pain in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Clinical Trial Registration: CTRI/2019/01/017272 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Complex regional pain syndrome is a form of long-term pain that involves an arm or a leg. It can develop after an injury, a surgery or a stroke. Although many drugs have been used for its treatment, the limited relief that these drugs produce along with their side effects have shifted focus to other physical and psychological modes of therapy. Mirror therapy is one such modality where the image of normal functioning limb seen in a mirror placed over the affected limb leads to pain relief in the affected limb. We have provided evidence that mirror therapy can reduce the pain of this syndrome and also decrease the levels of pain related genes in the body. This will help us to devise better treatment strategies for complex regional pain syndrome.

Mirror therapy effect on shoulder pain and disability and quality of life of mastectomy women: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate mirror therapy (MT) influence on shoulder pain/disability and quality of life in mastectomy women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty unilateral mastectomy women were recruited and randomly assigned to an MT group (N = 30) or a sham therapy (ST) (N = 30). Women in the MT and ST group attended a nurse-led, unsupervised, 30 min a day, five days a week, and at home training program for three weeks with and without a mirror, respectively. Shoulder pain and disability scale and QOL outcomes were assessed at baseline and 3 months after intervention. RESULTS: Shoulder pain and disability were significantly improved in the MT group but there was not meaningful difference between groups in the EORTC-QOL scales except for some functional scores of QLQ-BR23 scale in the MT group after 3 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses should instruct MT as a rehabilitation program to mastectomy patients during or after hospitalization to reduce their post-op shoulder pain and disability. This intervention may have also positive impact on their self-care outcomes. It is recommended that further studies should be performed with nurse-supervised exercises, a validated tool for measuring QOL for a long period after surgery, and a longer follow-up period at least for 6 months.Implication for rehabilitationThis study aimed to investigate whether an unsupervised, nurse-led mirror therapy (MT) can alleviate shoulder pain and disability of mastectomy patients and improve their quality of life.Our findings indicated that nurse-led MT as a novel rehabilitation option for mastectomy patients, may reduce shoulder pain and disability even after long period after the surgery.Rehabilitation centers can equip rooms for MT so breast cancer women can use it immediately after mastectomy.Mirror therapy can be used as a rehabilitation method for mastectomy patients because it is easy-to-use, inexpensive, and without the need to attend a rehabilitation center.Rehabilitation centers can provide mirrors along with nursing instructions to women who want to use this method at home.

Efficacy of mirror therapy and virtual reality therapy in alleviating phantom limb pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Amputations result from trauma, war, conflict, vascular diseases and cancer. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a potentially debilitating form of chronic pain affecting around 100 million amputees across the world. Mirror therapy and virtual reality (VR) are two commonly used treatments, and we evaluated their respective success rates. METHODS: A meta-analysis and systematic review was undertaken to investigate mirror therapy and VR in their ability to reduce pain levels. A mean difference (MD) model to compare group pain levels pretreatment and post-treatment via aggregating these results from numerous similar studies was employed. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan (V.5.4) and expressed in MD for visual analogue scale (VAS) score. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies met our search criteria; they consisted of eight mirror therapy with 214 participants and seven VR including 86 participants, totalling 300 participants. Mean age ranged from 36 to 63 years, 77% male, of which 61% were lower body amputees. Both led to a VAS reduction (mirror therapy mean reduction VAS score was 2.54, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.66; p<0.001; VR 2.24, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.20; p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in pain alleviation between mirror therapy and VR (p=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Mirror therapy and VR are both equally efficacious in alleviating PLP, but neither is more effective than the other. However, due to small sample size and limited number of studies, factors such as gender, cause of amputation, site of limb loss or length of time from amputation, which may influence treatment success, could not be explored.