The impact of menopausal hormone therapy on overall mortality - a comprehensive review.

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is indicated for menopausal symptom relief. However, MHT has also been shown to be beneficial for prevention of long-term estrogen deficiency sequelae including mortality. Based on a comprehensive literature review on MHT and mortality, the authors' recommendations are as follows: in postmenopausal women, MHT appears to confer a (significant) reduction in overall mortality; the benefit especially applies to women who initiate long-term MHT early after menopause; in women with prevalent cardiovascular risk factors (except for diabetes mellitus, where results are mixed), the benefit of MHT on overall mortality is even more pronounced; and, however, study results are difficult to compare due to heterogeneous study designs.

Management of Menopause and the Role For Hormone Therapy.

Hormone therapy remains the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms but decisions are complex, requiring an assessment of benefits and risks and determination of best treatment type, dose, and duration. Benefits exceed risks for most women with bothersome menopausal symptoms or high risk for fracture if initiated under age 60 years or within 10 years since menopause. Long-term mortality and safety data from the Women's Health Initiative is reassuring, with no increase in deaths from cardiovascular disease or cancer compared with placebo after 18 years of follow-up and a trend towards less mortality in those who initiate hormone therapy ages 50 to 59 years.

Increased longevity in older users of postmenopausal estrogen therapy: the Leisure World Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of postmenopausal estrogen therapy (ET), including duration and recency of use, on all-cause mortality in older women. DESIGN: As part of a prospective cohort study of residents of a California retirement community begun in the early 1980s, Leisure World Cohort women (median age, 73 y) completed a postal health survey including details on ET use and were followed up for 22 years (1981-2003). Age- and multivariate-adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were calculated using proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Of the 8,801 women, 6,626 died during follow-up (median age, 88 y). ET users had an age-adjusted mortality rate of 52.9 per 1,000 person-years compared with 56.5 among lifetime nonusers (RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96). Risk of death decreased with both increasing duration of ET and decreasing years since last use (P for trend < 0.001). The risk was lowest among long-term (≥15 y) users (RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93 for 15-19 y and RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94 for 201 y). For long-term users, the age-adjusted mortality rate was 50.4 per 1,000 person-years. Lower-dose users (≤0.625 mg) had a slightly better survival rate than higher-dose users (RR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91 vs RR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97). Risk did not differ by route of administration (P = 0.56). Further adjustment for potential confounders had little effect on the observed RRs for ET. CONCLUSION: Long-term ET is associated with lower all-cause mortality in older women.

Hormone Therapy Use and Risk of Chronic Disease in the Nurses' Health Study: A Comparative Analysis With the Women's Health Initiative.

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and chronic disease risk appear to have divergent results for cardiovascular disease. However, differences may be related to a modifying effect of age, time since menopause, and HT formulation. In the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) (enrolling during 1980-1994 and following participants until 2002), we investigated associations between the use of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (0.625 mg/day) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (<10 mg/day) or oral CEE alone and cardiovascular disease, cancer, all-cause mortality, and other major endpoints among postmenopausal women, aged 50-79 years at HT initiation. Among women aged 50-59 years at HT initiation, associations of CEE alone or CEE+MPA with most clinical outcomes were highly concordant between NHS and Women's Health Initiative (WHI). However, for myocardial infarction, results for CEE+MPA were in the direction of risk elevation in WHI and in the direction of risk reduction in NHS. When examined according to years since menopause onset (<10 years) rather than age group, results were nonsignificant and concordant for both studies. Because few women in the NHS initiated HT after age 60 years, we did not examine associations in this group. Discrepancies between NHS and WHI could largely be attributed to differences in the age structure of the populations and age at HT initiation.

Menopausal hormone treatment cardiovascular disease: another look at an unresolved conundrum.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in women. Before the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone trials, evidence favored the concept that menopausal hormone treatment (MHT) protects against CVD. WHI studies failed to demonstrate CVD benefit, with worse net outcomes for MHT versus placebo in the population studied. We review evidence regarding the relationship between MHT and CVD with consideration of mechanisms and risk factors for atherogenesis and cardiac events, results of observational case-control and cohort studies, and outcomes of randomized trials. Estrogen effects on CVD risk factors favor delay or amelioration of atherosclerotic plaque development but may increase risk of acute events when at-risk plaque is present. Long-term observational studies have shown ∼40% reductions in risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Analyses of data from randomized control trials other than the WHI show a ∼30% cardioprotective effect in recently menopausal women. Review of the literature as well as WHI data suggests that younger and/or more recently menopausal women may have a better risk-benefit ratio than older or remotely menopausal women and that CVD protection may only occur after >5 years; WHI women averaged 63 years of age (12 years postmenopausal) and few were studied for >6 years. Thus, a beneficial effect of long-term MHT on CVD and mortality is still an open question and is likely to remain controversial for the foreseeable future.

Effects of hormone therapy on cognition and mood.

OBJECTIVE: Results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS) suggested that hormone therapy (HT) may be detrimental to cognitive health. This article reviews clinical studies that address issues relevant to those results. DESIGN: Literature review. INTERVENTION(S): A search of Pubmed and Web of Science was conducted using the search terms HT and cognition, HT and mood. Clinical and observational studies were selected if they were published after the year 2000. Theories of HT mechanisms of action, pharmacology, biology, and observational and clinical trials are discussed. RESULT(S): Although observational and clinical trials show conflicting findings, methodologic considerations must be acknowledged. HT formulation and dose, route of administration, timing of initiation, length of treatment, and health of participants all contribute to inconsistencies in results. Transdermal estradiol and micronized progesterone administered at time of menopause are generally associated with cognitive and affective benefit. CONCLUSION(S): At the present time, results from existing studies are equivocal regarding the benefits of HT on cognition and affect. Future studies, such as the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS), should address methodologic inconsistencies to provide clearer answers to this important question.

Individualizing hormone-therapy according to cardiovascular risk.

There is growing consensus that the benefit to risk profile for hormone therapy is high for healthy, low-risk women initiating therapy within 10 years of menopause or under age 60. However, special considerations are needed for women who are outside those boundaries or for those that have risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Placebo adherence and mortality in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study.

BACKGROUND: Analyses from double-blind randomized trials have reported lower mortality among participants who were more adherent to placebo compared with those who were less adherent. We explored this phenomenon by analyzing data from the placebo arm of the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Our primary aim was to measure and explain the association between adherence to placebo and total mortality among the placebo-allocated participants in the HERS. Secondary aims included assessment of the association between placebo adherence and cause-specific morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Participants with "higher placebo adherence" were defined as having taken at least 75% of their placebo study medication during each individual's participation in the study, whereas those with "lower placebo adherence" took less than 75%. The primary outcome was in-study all-cause mortality. RESULTS: More adherent participants had significantly lower total mortality compared with less adherent participants (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.93). Adjusting for available confounders did not change the magnitude or significance of the estimates. Analyses revealed that the association of higher adherence and mortality might be explained, in part, by time-dependent confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of the HERS data support a strong association between adherence to placebo study medication and mortality. Although probably not due to simple confounding by healthy lifestyle factors, the underlying mechanism for the association remains unclear. Further analyses of this association are necessary to explain this observation.

Health outcomes associated with hormone therapy in Australian women.

The risks and benefits of hormone therapy (HT) in the treatment of postmenopausal women remain controversial. In this population-based, observational study, we documented health outcomes among postmenopausal Australian women using HT. Women aged 60-80 years were recruited into the Geelong Osteoporosis Study 1994-7 and followed over a median period of 6.6 years. Mortality, and the development of vascular events, breast and colorectal cancers were documented for 67 HT-users and 521 non-users. Median duration of HT-use was 5.0 years (IQR 3.0-10.0). There was no excess in all-cause mortality associated with HT-use. Based on 92 deaths (six HT-users, 86 non-users), the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for all-cause mortality was 0.79 (95%CI 0.32-1.97). With 99 reports of vascular events (13 HT-users, 86 non-users), the adjusted OR for vascular events was 1.30 (95%CI 0.66-2.57). There were insufficient numbers of breast or colorectal cancer cases (21 breast cancer cases, all non-HT users; and 7 colorectal cancer cases, one HT-user and six non-users) to adequately calculate the risk associated with exposure to HT. Although the sample size was small, these results do not support an association between HT and mortality, despite a possible link between HT and increased risk of developing vascular disease.

Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) in patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) on reoccurrence, cancer-related mortality, and overall mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer. METHODS: We performed a quantitative review of all studies reporting experience with menopausal HT for symptomatic use after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Rates of reoccurrence, cancer-related mortality, and overall mortality were calculated in this entire group. A subgroup analysis was performed in studies using a control population to assess the odds ratio of cancer reoccurrence and mortality in hormone users versus non-users. RESULTS: Fifteen studies encompassing 1416 breast cancer survivors using HT were identified. Seven studies included a control group comprised of 1998 patients. Among the 1416 HT users, reoccurrence was noted in 10.0% (95% CI: 8.4-11.6%). Cancer-related mortality occurred at a rate of 2.6% (95% CI: 1.8-3.7%), while overall mortality was 4.5% (95% CI: 3.4-5.8%). Compared to non-users, patients using HT had a decreased chance of reoccurrence and cancer-related mortality with combined odds ratio of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.2-0.7) and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.0-0.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our review, menopausal HT use in breast cancer survivors was not associated with increased cancer reoccurrence, cancer-related mortality or total mortality. Despite conflicting opinions on this issue, it is important for primary care physicians to feel comfortable medically managing the increasing number of breast cancer survivors. In the subset of women with severe menopausal symptoms, HT options should be reviewed if non-hormonal methods are ineffective. Future trials should focus on better ways to identify breast cancer survivors who may safely benefit from HT versus those who have a substantial risk of reoccurrence with HT use.

Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease.

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic oophorectomy is often recommended concurrent with hysterectomy for benign disease. The optimal age for this recommendation in women at average risk for ovarian cancer has not been determined. METHODS: Using published age-specific data for absolute and relative risk, both with and without oophorectomy, for ovarian cancer, coronary heart disease, hip fracture, breast cancer, and stroke, a Markov decision analysis model was used to estimate the optimal strategy for maximizing survival for women at average risk of ovarian cancer. For each 5-year age group from 40 to 80 years, 4 strategies were compared: ovarian conservation or oophorectomy, and use of estrogen therapy or nonuse. Outcomes, as proportion of women alive at age 80 years, were measured. Sensitivity analyses were performed, varying both relative and absolute risk estimates across the range of reported values. RESULTS: Ovarian conservation until age 65 benefits long-term survival for women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. Women with oophorectomy before age 55 have 8.58% excess mortality by age 80, and those with oophorectomy before age 59 have 3.92% excess mortality. There is sustained, but decreasing, benefit until the age of 75, when excess mortality for oophorectomy is less than 1%. These results were unchanged following multiple sensitivity analyses and were most sensitive to the risk of coronary heart disease. CONCLUSION: Ovarian conservation until at least age 65 benefits long-term survival for women at average risk of ovarian cancer when undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease.

[Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular risk: role of conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate]. / Einfluss postmenopausaler Hormonsubstitution mit konjugierten equinen Ostrogenen und Medroxyprogesteronazetat auf das kardiovaskuläre Risiko.

Atherosclerosis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease of the vasculature that accounts for the majority of morbidity and mortality in women. The incidence of atherosclerosis is low in premenopausal women and increases after ovariectomy. Experimental studies demonstrate inhibitory effects of natural estrogens on the progression of atherosclerosis. In contrast, results from recent hormone replacement trials using conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate in postmenopausal women showed no effects or even an increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality such as thrombosis or stroke. Therefore, conjugated equine estrogens alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate should not be recommended for the prevention or treatment of cardiovascular disease. Optimizing the risk factor profile such as cessation of smoking, normalizing body weight and blood pressure, regular physical activity, and statin treatment of patients with coronary artery disease remain important treatment options.

The relation of C-reactive protein levels to total and cardiovascular mortality in older U.S. women.

PURPOSE: To determine whether serum C-reactive protein levels, a sensitive indicator of inflammation, are associated with the risk of cardiovascular mortality among older women. METHODS: We conducted a case-cohort study within the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, a population-based study involving 9,704 women aged > or = 65 years from four U.S. centers. We randomly selected 400 women from the entire cohort plus an additional random sample of 92 women from the 1,125 women in the cohort who had died during the first 6 years of follow-up. Baseline serum C-reactive protein levels were measured using a high-sensitivity immunoassay. Cause-specific mortality was ascertained by review of death certificates and hospitalization records. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association between C-reactive protein levels and cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: During 6 years of follow-up, 150 of the 492 women died, including 52 who died of cardiovascular disease. After adjusting for potential confounders, women with C-reactive protein levels in the highest quartile (>3.0 mg/L) had a 8.0-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2 to 29) greater risk of cardiovascular mortality than those in the lowest quartile (< or = 1.0 mg/L). The association remained strong in women who did not smoke or take estrogen, and when early deaths were excluded. Women who smoked and whose C-reactive protein levels were above the first quartile had a very high risk of cardiovascular mortality (relative risk [RR] = 13; 95% CI: 3.4 to 47). C-reactive protein levels were not associated with noncardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.4 to 2.1). CONCLUSION: C-reactive protein level was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in older women.

Cause-specific mortality in women receiving hormone replacement therapy.

To assess the risks and benefits of menopausal hormone replacement therapy, we followed a 23,346-member, population-based cohort of Swedish women who were prescribed menopausal estrogens for an average of 8.6 years for mortality. Compared with the general population, the standardized mortality ratio for all-cause mortality in this cohort was 0.77 (95% confidence limits = 0.73, 0.81). Deaths in each of the 12 major categories of causes of death except for injuries occurred 12% to 86% less frequently than expected. We examined in detail four specific causes of death according to the type of hormone prescribed, namely weak estrogens (primarily estriol), more potent estrogens (primarily estradiol and conjugated estrogens) in combination with a progestin, and more potent estrogens without a progestin. Mortality from endometrial cancer was not related to the prescription of weak estrogens or an estrogen-progestin combination, but mortality was 40% higher in women prescribed more potent estrogens without a progestin. Women prescribed weak estrogens, more potent estrogens, and the combined estrogen-progestin regimen were at reduced risk of death from ischemic heart disease (standardized mortality ratios of 0.7, 0.6, and 0.4, respectively). The more potent estrogens and the estrogen-progestin combination were associated with a marked reduction in risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (standardize mortality ratios of 0.4 and 0.6, respectively) and "other" cerebrovascular disease, but not other types of stroke. The concern that use of progestins would lead to psychic disorders related to suicide received no support from our results. Breast cancer results are described elsewhere. These data provide little evidence of an adverse effect of the combined estrogen-progestin regimen as compared with estrogens alone on mortality. They do indicate, however, that both selection factors and biology may contribute to the almost across-the-board-reduction in mortality associated with hormone replacement therapy.

Reduced mortality associated with long-term postmenopausal estrogen therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare all-cause and specific-cause mortality rates in women who had or had not used long-term postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT). METHODS: We identified women who used long-term postmenopausal ERT and compared them with a sample of age-matched postmenopausal nonusers. Through linking of these subjects' medical record numbers to various data bases, we examined survivorship and cause of death among estrogen users and nonusers. The risk of death in 232 postmenopausal women who began ERT within 3 years of menopause and used it for at least 5 years was compared with that of 222 age-matched postmenopausal nonusers. In the users, the mean length of estrogen use was 17.1 years. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in all-cause mortality were found in users compared with nonusers. For death from any cause, the age-adjusted relative risk (RR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) in estrogen users was 0.54 (0.38-0.76). The reduction in all-cause mortality was largely due to reductions in coronary heart disease (RR 0.40, CI 0.16-1.02) and other cardiovascular disease (RR 0.27, CI 0.10-0.71). Overall cancer mortality was similar in the two groups (RR 0.85, CI 0.46-1.58), although estrogen users had a higher risk of death from breast cancer (RR 1.89, CI 0.43-8.36) and lower risk of death from lung cancer (RR 0.22, CI 0.04-1.15). CONCLUSION: Long-term ERT use is associated with lower all-cause mortality and confers this apparent protection primarily through reduction in cardiovascular disease.