Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 106(3): 893-901, 2021 03 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32810277

RESUMO

CONTEXT: As the number of transgender (trans) people (including those who are binary and/or nonbinary identified) seeking gender-affirming hormone therapy rises, endocrinologists are increasingly asked to assist with interpretation of laboratory tests. Many common laboratory tests such as hemoglobin, iron studies, cardiac troponin, and creatinine are affected by sex steroids or body size. We seek to provide a summary of the impact of feminizing and masculinizing hormone therapy on common laboratory tests and an approach to interpretation. CASES: Case scenarios discussed include 1) hemoglobin and hematocrit in a nonbinary person undergoing masculinizing hormone therapy; 2) estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a trans woman at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy; 3) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a trans woman; and 4) chest pain in a trans man with a cardiac troponin concentration between the reported male and female reference ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of exogenous gender-affirming hormone therapy on fat and muscle distribution and other physiological changes determines interpretation of laboratory tests that have sex-specific differences. In addition to affirmative practice to ensure a patient's name, gender, and pronoun are used appropriately, we propose that once individuals have commenced gender-affirming hormone therapy, the reference range of the affirmed gender be reported (and specified by treating clinicians) except for PSA or cardiac troponin, which are dependent on organ size. While suggestions may be challenging to implement, they also represent an opportunity to lead best practice to improve the quality of care and experiences of healthcare for all trans people.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Transexualidade , Adulto , Idoso , Artefatos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Endócrino/normas , Feminino , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência , Procedimentos de Readequação Sexual/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos de Readequação Sexual/métodos , Pessoas Transgênero , Transexualidade/sangue , Transexualidade/diagnóstico , Transexualidade/patologia
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 69(6S): 3S-125S.e40, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31159978

RESUMO

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG) are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR) hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP) and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen) has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies) for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Isquemia/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca/normas , Doença Crônica , Consenso , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/mortalidade , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Terminologia como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 16(2): 116-28, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25805097

RESUMO

Functional assessment of coronary lesions has become an integral part of routine practice in most cath labs. Such evaluation is performed using a pressure wire that allows measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR). The latter has received a class I indication with level of evidence A according to the most recent European guidelines on myocardial revascularization for the assessment of angiographically moderate coronary lesions. The present document has the following objectives: 1) to summarize the theoretical basis of FFR; 2) to provide a guideline for vasodilator therapy; 3) to summarize scientific evidence supporting FFR; 4) to provide a model of health economy evaluation focusing on resource sparing associated with the use of FFR.


Assuntos
Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Trifosfato de Adenosina , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Circulação Colateral , Circulação Coronária , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Diástole , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Testes de Função Cardíaca/economia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Itália , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Contração Miocárdica , Nitroprussiato , Papaverina , Vasodilatadores
7.
Intern Med J ; 43(1): 7-17, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22947413
8.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 18(4): 289-94, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22498735

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this work was to present and analyze the latest published documents about the functional evaluation of patients undergoing lung resection and review articles from the past two years addressing the same topic. RECENT FINDINGS: In 2009 and 2010, two important task forces, appointed by international scientific societies, have published documents to guide the preoperative evaluation and risk stratification of lung resection candidates. In both documents, cardiac evaluation is prioritized. Detailed cardiologic guidelines have been proposed. After this first step, functional assessment should include a spirometric assessment, asystematic measurement of carbon monoxide diffusion capacity and a cardiopulmonary exercise test evaluation. Differences in the relative importance of these tests in the two guidelines were discussed. Most recent evidences focused on the role of cardiopulmonary exercise test and the use of several direct and indirect ergometric parameters that may refine risk assessment. SUMMARY: The use of evidence-based clinical guidelines on preoperative evaluation is recommendable. Nevertheless, scientific evidence is still suboptimal in this field. Aggregate analyses on larger series are needed to improve risk stratification.


Assuntos
Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Testes de Função Respiratória/normas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Pneumonectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medição de Risco
9.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 143(4): 780-803, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22424518

RESUMO

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an update of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization frequently considered. In the initial document, 180 clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document, and the definition of appropriateness was unchanged. The technical panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate and likely to improve patients' health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization is considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization will improve health outcomes or survival is uncertain. In general, as seen with the prior AUC, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia is appropriate. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy are viewed less favorably. The technical panel felt that based on recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting remains an appropriate method of revascularization for patients with high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, percutaneous coronary intervention may have a role in revascularization of patients with high burden of CAD. The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to improve physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and to guide future research.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Revascularização Miocárdica/normas , Seleção de Pacientes , Algoritmos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
10.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 122(13-14): 441-51, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20628904

RESUMO

Regarding limited availability of organ donors for heart transplantation, it is necessary to discuss optimal donor evaluation and donor management. In this manuscript general donor-related parameters as well as heart-specific parameters are discussed regarding international literature. In addition, "marginal" donors and in contrast "optimal" donors are defined. Donor management including optimal hemodynamic management and additional specific intensive care aspects are presented. Exact donor evaluation allows for matching the organ to the most suitable recipient and is therefore especially in the context of marginal donors a crucial step within transplantation process.


Assuntos
Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Transplante de Coração/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Doadores de Tecidos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Áustria , Causas de Morte , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/fisiologia , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Humanos , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Design de Software , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 50(17): e159-241, 2007 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17950140
13.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 50(17): 1707-32, 2007 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17950159
14.
Circulation ; 116(17): 1971-96, 2007 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17901356
15.
Circulation ; 116(17): e418-99, 2007 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17901357
17.
AANA J ; 72(5): 365-71, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15529733

RESUMO

This AANA Journal course discusses the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. The intent of the ACC/AHA guideline is to assist clinicians in clinical decision making by describing a range of generally acceptable approaches for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of cardiac diseases. Optimizing the anesthetic management of the cardiac patient undergoing noncardiac surgery is becoming increasingly important: as the percentage of Americans older than 65 years continues to grow, so does the prevalence of cardiac disease in this population. Simply accepting a preoperative cardiology clearance for the cardiac patient undergoing noncardiac surgery provides little information that can be used for risk assessment and management of anesthesia. While national practice patterns vary significantly, there is an important need to standardize cost-effective preoperative cardiac evaluation. By using evidence-based studies, the ACC/AHA guideline delineates methods to objectively categorize cardiovascular risk and use data from the cardiology consultation to refine anesthetic management. Use of the guideline can lead to more efficient evaluation of the noncardiac patient with cardiac disease, which can decrease morbidity, mortality, and cost.


Assuntos
Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Algoritmos , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/enfermagem , Anestesia/normas , Cardiologia , Árvores de Decisões , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Cardiopatias/complicações , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/enfermagem , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Humanos , Enfermeiros Anestesistas/educação , Enfermeiros Anestesistas/organização & administração , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Avaliação em Enfermagem/métodos , Avaliação em Enfermagem/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/enfermagem , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
Can J Cardiol ; 19(7): 802-8, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12813614

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have examined the diagnostic abilities of various functional tests to assess graft stenosis or the progression of coronary artery disease after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. However, a meta-analysis of these studies has not been performed. OBJECTIVES: To pool the results of studies examining the diagnostic abilities of exercise treadmill testing (ETT), stress myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography to predict graft stenosis or progression of disease in the native circulation post-CABG. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify studies examining post-CABG functional testing for the diagnosis of graft stenosis or progression of native disease. Sensitivities and specificities of these studies were pooled, and predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A pooled analysis demonstrates that for the identification of graft stenosis or progression of native disease, ETT alone has a sensitivity of 45% (95% CI 36% to 54%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI 68% to 95%). The use of stress myocardial perfusion imaging increased the sensitivity to 68% (95% CI 51% to 86%) and specificity to 84% (95% CI 78% to 91%). The use of stress echocardiography also resulted in an increased sensitivity of 86% (95% CI 78% to 94%) and specificity of 90% (95% CI 84% to 95%). CONCLUSION: If post-CABG functional testing is performed, stress ventricular imaging is superior to ETT alone for the diagnosis of graft stenosis or progression of disease in the native vessels.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/reabilitação , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Reestenose Coronária/diagnóstico , Progressão da Doença , Ecocardiografia sob Estresse , Teste de Esforço , Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Cintilografia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tálio
20.
Med. UIS ; 9(1): 2-8, ene.-mar. 1995. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-232109

RESUMO

Con el propósito de determinar los principales factores condicionantes de la capacidad aeróbica funcional, se estudiaron 326 pruebas de esfuerzo realizadas ocn fines diagnósticos en pacientes remitidos para estudio de problemas cardiovasculares. En todos se aplicó el protocolo de Bruce y se calcularon los parámetros de respuesta al ejercicio según los criterios de este autor. La muestra incluyó 95 mujeres y 231 hombres. En 252 pacientes (76 por ciento) se presentó una respuesta normal de la presión arterial con el ejercicio, 60 (18 por ciento) mostraron una respuesta moderadamente hipertensiva y 20 (6 por ciento) una respuesta definitivamente hipertensiva. El promedio de capacidad aeróbica en pacientes normotensos fue 96 por ciento, en los que presentaron moderada respuesta hipertensiva 92 por ciento y en quienes tuvieron una respuesta definitivamente hipertensiva 78.6 por ciento (p=0.0015). En 83 pacientes hubo evidencia electrocardiográfica de isquemia. El promedio de capacidad aeróbica en estos pacientes fue de 90.62 en comparación con 95.65 de los que no presntaron isquemia (p=0.026). En 35 pacientes fue referida la angina y el promedio de capacidad aeróbica en este grupo fue de 80.4 (p=0.000023). La presencia de arritmia en forma independiente no afectó significativamente la capacidad aeróbica, con promedios de 89.3 en arritmias supra y ventriculares y 94.1 en pacientes sin arritmias. Se concluye que la presencia de angina y una curva de presión arterial de ascenso rápido son los principales limitantes de la capacidad de ejercicio. Los signos de isquemia aunque más frecuentes que el síntoma angina, y la hipertensión arterial de ascenso moderado la limitan en menor grado. La obesidad y las arritmias ventriculares simples no limitan la capacidad de ejercicio aeróbico


Assuntos
Humanos , Teste de Esforço , Teste de Esforço/normas , Teste de Esforço/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste de Esforço/tendências , Teste de Esforço/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/métodos , Testes de Função Cardíaca/normas , Testes de Função Cardíaca/tendências , Testes de Função Cardíaca
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA