Microfluidic System-Based Quantitative Analysis of Platelet Function through Speckle Size Measurement.

Platelets play essential roles in the formation of blood clots by clumping with coagulation factors at the site of vascular injury to stop bleeding; therefore, a reduction in the platelet number or disorder in their function causes bleeding risk. In our research, we developed a method to assess platelet aggregation using an optical approach within a microfluidic chip's channel by evaluating the size of laser speckles. These speckles, associated with slowed blood flow in the microfluidic channel, had a baseline size of 28.54 ± 0.72 µm in whole blood. Removing platelets from the sample led to a notable decrease in speckle size to 27.04 ± 1.23 µm. Moreover, the addition of an ADP-containing agonist, which activates platelets, resulted in an increased speckle size of 32.89 ± 1.69 µm. This finding may provide a simple optical method via microfluidics that could be utilized to assess platelet functionality in diagnosing bleeding disorders and potentially in monitoring therapies that target platelets.

Point-of-care platelet function tests: relevance to arterial thrombosis and opportunities for improvement.

Studies using whole blood platelet aggregometry as a laboratory research tool, provided important insights into the mechanism and modulators of platelet aggregation. Subsequently, a number of point-of-care (POC) platelet function tests (PFTs) were developed for clinical use, based on the concept that an individual's thrombotic profile could be assessed in vitro by assessing the response to stimulation of platelet aggregation by specific, usually solo agonists such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen and thrombin. However, adjusting antiplatelet medication in order to improve the results of such POC PFTs has not translated into a meaningful reduction in cardiovascular events, which may be attributable to important differences between the POC PFT techniques and in vivo conditions, including patient-to-patient variability. Important limitations of most tests include the use of citrate-anticoagulated blood. Citrate directly and irreversibly diminishes platelet function and even after recalcification, it may result in altered platelet aggregation in response to ADP, epinephrine or collagen, and interfere with thrombin generation from activated platelets. Furthermore, most tests do not employ flowing blood and therefore do not assess the effect of high shear forces on platelets that initiate, propagate and stabilize arterial thrombi. Finally, the effect of endogenous thrombolysis, due to fibrinolysis and dislodgement, which ultimately determines the outcome of a thrombotic stimulus, is mostly not assessed. In order to accurately reflect an individual's predisposition to arterial thrombosis, future tests of thrombotic status which overcome these limitations should be used, to improve cardiovascular risk prediction and to guide pharmacotherapy.

Correlation Between the VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay and the Newly Developed APAL System in Neuroendovascular Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is the gold standard method for assessing platelet function. Recently, a new parameter called adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL) was developed to aid interpretation of LTA results. APAL is a score calculated based on platelet aggregation patterns upon exposure to 1 µM and 10 µM ADP and is determined using an automated coagulation analyzer. We compared APAL and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay for neuroendovascular patients. METHODS: 42 patients who have received antiplatelet therapy were studied. Platelet function tests were performed on CS-2400 for APAL and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay was used for P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and % inhibition. RESULTS: Moderate correlations were observed between APAL and PRU (r=0.64, p<0.001) and between APAL and % inhibition (r=-0.74, p<0.001). The optimal threshold for APAL was 8.2 for PRU (threshold=240) and 8.1 for % inhibition (threshold=26%). The percentage of agreement between the above thresholds was 90.9% between PRU and APAL and 77.3% between % inhibition and APAL. CONCLUSIONS: The APAL system exhibits moderate correlation with PRU and % inhibition. APAL testing is a good choice for a clinical laboratory already in possession of Sysmex CS series analyzers. In this setting, APAL testing can significantly decrease the cost of platelet function testing for patients on antiplatelet therapy.

Monitoring Antiplatelet Aggregation In Vivo and In Vitro by Microtiter Plate Method.

BACKGROUND: The current light transmission aggregation method is a recognized conventional method for platelet function evaluation, but it is time-consuming and poor in parallelism and cannot simultaneously monitor multiple inducers at multiple levels. The microtiter plate method has been established because of the high-throughput characteristic, but it needs more practical applications. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtiter plate method by using aspirin and clopidogrel in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: In vitro, the platelet aggregations inhibited by aspirin (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 90 µM) and clopidogrel (1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300 µM) were evaluated with the presence of arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) agonists. Using the combination index (CI), the effect of the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel on platelet aggregation was evaluated. In vivo, New Zealand rabbits (n = 18) were randomly divided into 3 groups, aspirin group (5 mg/kg, intragastrical gavage [i.g.]), clopidogrel group (14 mg/kg at the first day, followed by 4 mg/kg, i.g.), and the combination of these two drugs, administered (i.g.) continuously for 7 days. Then, the blood was collected to measure platelet aggregation. RESULTS: Different concentrations of AA (12.5, 25, 50, 100 µM) and ADP (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 µM) could promote platelet aggregation in concentration-dependent manner, and the most stable induction concentrations of AA and ADP were 50 and 5 µM. In vitro, with the above optimized detection system, aspirin and clopidogrel alone or in combination had concentration-dependent antiplatelet aggregation. The combination of aspirin and clopidogrel also showed synergistic inhibition effect within the concentration range studied. In vivo, aspirin and clopidogrel alone or in combination inhibited platelet aggregation induced by multiple concentrations of AA and ADP agonists, and the combined inhibition was more significant during the administration than aspirin or clopidogrel alone. CONCLUSIONS: The improved microtiter plate method combining the use of multiple levels of multiple agonists avoids the variation of the effective inducer concentrations due to individual different response of platelets to agonists. It may be a potential approach in the detection of platelet aggregation.

Platelet Activity Measured by VerifyNow® Aspirin Sensitivity Test Identifies Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients at Increased Risk for Postoperative Bleeding and Transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Identifying predictors of bleeding in patients before coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is important, given the complications of bleeding and finite supply of blood. Patient response to aspirin is heterogeneous and can be evaluated using point-of-care platelet function tests. We postulated that patients who hyper-respond to aspirin given preoperatively, as identified by VerifyNow® Aspirin assay (Accumetrics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), are at increased risk of bleeding and transfusion. METHODS: This prospective pilot study examined response to aspirin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (n = 61) from 2009 to 2013. Patients with aspirin reaction unit (ARU) values in the lower 50th percentile as identified by VerifyNow® assays were defined as aspirin hyper-responders. The proportion of patients transfused and the median adjusted indexed drop in haemoglobin were compared between aspirin hyper-responders and non-hyper-responders. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with increased risk of transfusion. RESULTS: Seventy per cent (70%) of aspirin hyper-responders were transfused perioperatively compared with 39% of patients who did not hyper-respond, (OR 3.694, 95% CI 1.275-10.706, p = 0.014). VerifyNow® Aspirin hyper-responders had a greater median adjusted indexed drop in haemoglobin compared to non-hyper-responders (34.1 g/L versus 26.6 g/L respectively, p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis also showed VerifyNow® Aspirin hyper-response to be an independent predictor of transfusion (p = 0.016). Other variables such as age, gender, body mass index, renal insufficiency, and cross clamp and bypass times were not predictors of postoperative bleeding in this pilot cohort. CONCLUSIONS: VerifyNow® Aspirin is able to preoperatively identify aspirin hyper-responders at an increased risk of bleeding and subsequent transfusion in the context of coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Whole blood platelet aggregation determined by the ROTEM platelet equipment; reference intervals and stability.

Point of care testing of residual effect of antiplatelet therapy in trauma patients or during major surgery may result in improved clinical management of significant bleeding. We included 121 healthy individuals (57 females and 64 males, aged 22-65 years) in order to establish reference intervals for platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADPTEM, 10 µM), arachidonic acid (ARATEM, 0.42 mM) and thrombin activating peptide (TRAPTEM, 36 µM) employing the ROTEM platelet module. Further, the impact of citrate (3.2%) and hirudin (>15 µg/ml) as anticoagulants was evaluated. Finally, we investigated assay stability (15, 30, 60, and 120 min after blood sampling) (n = 8) and between-day variation (n = 5). We report reference intervals for 121 healthy individuals and reference intervals by gender. We observed significantly higher platelet aggregation in females than in males (all P-values < 0.05). No correlation between age and platelet aggregation was observed, except for the parameter TRAPTEM amplitude (A6), in which a decline in A6 was observed with increasing age (P = 0.03). We observed significantly lower levels of platelet aggregation in citrate tubes than in hirudin tubes (all P-values < 0.05), except from TRAPTEM maximum slope, where no significant difference was observed (P = 0.40).The stability was acceptable (≤20% deviation) for up to 120 min for ARATEM in citrate tubes, and up to 60 min for the ADPTEM and TRAPTEM assays in citrate tubes. In hirudin tubes we found ADPTEM and ARATEM assays to be stable for 60 min, while the stability of TRAPTEM in hirudin tubes was found to be stable for 30 min. Using citrate tubes, the between-day variation (mean coefficient of variation, CV) was 19-20% for ADPTEM, 19-26% for TRAPTEM, and 10% for ARATEM, whereas the mean CV was 11-13% for all three assays in hirudin tubes.In conclusion, we established combined and gender-specific reference intervals for three platelet aggregation assays in both citrate- and hirudin tubes. In citrate tubes, the stability of the ROTEM platelet assays was 60-120 min, while the stability in hirudin tubes was 30-60 min. The between-day variation was lowest for samples obtained in hirudin tubes.

Whole blood platelet aggregation kinetics under cardiopulmonary bypass: A pilot study.

Assessing the platelets' functional status during surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass is challenging. This study used multiple electrode impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®) to create a timeline of platelet aggregation changes as induced by cardiopulmonary bypass in antiplatelet-naive patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral valve regurgitation. We performed six consecutive measurements (T1: pre-operatively, T2: after heparinization, T3: 3 min after establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, T4: immediately after administration of cardioplegia, T5: 5 min after administration of cardioplegia, and T6: 45 min after administration of cardioplegia). Platelet aggregation was determined after stimulation with 3.2-µg/mL collagen, 6.4-µM adenosine diphosphate, and 32-µM thrombin receptor activating peptide. Five patients were included (age: 64 ± 10 years, one female). We observed a decrease in hematocrit levels by -17.1% ± 3.7% (T1 vs T6) with a drop after establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2 vs T3) and slightly decreasing platelet counts by -6.2% ± 7.7% (T1 vs T6). Immediately after establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2 vs T3), we observed reduced platelet aggregation responses for stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (-19.7% ± 12.8%) and thrombin receptor activating peptide (-19.3% ± 6.3%). Interestingly, we found augmented platelet aggregation for all stimuli 45 min after administration of cardioplegia (T5 vs T6) with the strongest increase for collagen (+83.4% ± 42.8%; adenosine diphosphate: +39.0% ± 37.2%; thrombin receptor activating peptide: +34.5% ± 18.5%). Thus, after an initial drop due to hemodilution upon establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, platelet reactivity increased over time which was not outweighed by decreasing platelet counts due to mechanical platelet destruction and absorption. These findings have implications for rational transfusion, peri-operative antiplatelet therapy, and for the management of patients on other extracorporeal support, such as extracorporeal life support or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Comparison of three common whole blood platelet function tests for in vitro P2Y12 induced platelet inhibition.

In the context of interventional cardiology, platelet function testing may identify patients treated with P2Y12-inhibitors at an increased risk of mortality, thrombosis and bleeding. Several whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers are available; however, inter-device differences have not been examined systematically. To compare three platelet function tests under standardized in vitro conditions. Healthy volunteer (n = 10) blood samples were spiked with increasing concentrations of ticagrelor (0-7500 ng/mL) and/or ASA (0-3280 ng/mL), measured on three platelet function analyzers (TEG®6s, Multiplate®, and VerifyNow®) and respective Effective Concentration (EC) levels EC10, EC50 and EC90 were calculated. Repeatability was assessed in a separate group of pooled blood samples (n = 10) spiked with ticagrelor at EC10, EC50 and EC90. ASA had no impact on ADP-activated channels for all three devices. TEG®6s was able to distinguish (p ≤ 0.05) between all ticagrelor EC zones; VerifyNow® and Multiplate® were able to distinguish between three and two zones, respectively. Multiplate® showed the largest window between EC10 and EC90 (19-9153 ng/mL), followed by TEG®6s (144-2589 ng/mL), and VerifyNow® (191-1100 ng/mL). Drug effect models distribution of disagreements were identified for TEG®6s (5.0%), VerifyNow® (8.3%), and Multiplate® (13.3%). TEG®6s showed the smallest average coefficient of variation between EC conditions (5.1%), followed by Multiplate® (14.1%), and VerifyNow® (17.7%). Linear models could be generated between TEG®6s and Multiplate®, but not VerifyNow®. Significant differences were found between whole blood point-of-care platelet function analyzers and the clinical impact of these differences needs to be further investigated.

Evaluation of the Newly Developed Adenosine Diphosphate-Induced Platelet Aggregation Level System in Aggregometer on Automated Coagulation Analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is the gold standard for platelet function assessment. The automated coagulation analyzer from Sysmex that performs LTA offers the advantage of being a walk-away technology. Recently, a new parameter "ADP-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL)" was developed to support the interpretation of results. APAL is calculated as a score from 0.0 to 10.0 based on platelet aggregation patterns with 1 and 10 µM adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Here, the basic performance of the newly developed APAL system and comparison with the maximum aggregation rate of ADP (ADP-MA) was evaluated. METHODS: The within-run precision was calculated by conducting five replicate analyses of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from healthy volunteers and 0.05 µM of cangrelor-spiked PRP. Cangrelor is a P2Y12 inhibitor that does not require liver CYP activation. The reference interval was calculated from the results of 67 healthy volunteers. The effect of the antiplatelet P2Y12 agent was evaluated using several concentrations of cangrelor. A comparative study was performed using 103 PRP samples with different levels of aggregation. Each test was analyzed with both APAL and ADP-MA. RESULTS: The percentage coefficient of variation in within-run precision was within 7% for APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA. Reference interval of APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA was 7.1 - 10.0 and 80.0 - 99.2%, respectively. APAL signifi-cantly decreased with the addition of 0.02 µM cangrelor, while 10 µM ADP-MA was barely affected. A significant correlation was observed between APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA (r = 0.94; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed APAL system exhibited an acceptable performance. APAL score showed a good correlation with ADP-MA and was adequate to detect the weak effect of P2Y12 inhibitors. APAL is a new platelet aggregation scoring system with the potential to monitor the effects of P2Y12 inhibitor over a wide range.

Laser speckle decorrelation time-based platelet function testing in microfluidic system.

Platelet aggregation and adhesion are critically involved in both normal hemostasis and thrombosis during vascular injury. Before any surgery, it is important to identify the number of platelets and their functionality to reduce the risk of bleeding; therefore, platelet function testing is a requirement. We introduce a novel evaluation method of assessing platelet function with laser speckle contrast imaging. The speckle decorrelation time (SDT) of the blood flowing through a microfluidic channel chip provides a quantitative measure of platelet aggregation. We compared SDTs of whole blood and platelet-poor blood, i.e., whole blood stripped of its buffy coat region, and found a marked reduction in decorrelation time for platelet-poor blood. The measured SDT of platelet-poor blood was 1.04 ± 0.21 ms, while that of whole blood was 2.64 ± 0.83 ms. To further characterize the sensitivity of our speckle decorrelation time-based platelet function testing (SDT-PFT), we added various agonists involved in platelet aggregation, including adenosine diphosphate (ADP), epinephrine (EPI), and arachidonic acid (AA). In this study, the results show that whole blood with ADP resulted in the largest SDT, followed by whole blood with AA, whole blood with EPI, whole blood without agonist, and platelet-poor blood with or without agonist. These findings show that SDT-PFT has the potential for rapid screening of bleeding disorders and monitoring of anti-platelet therapies with only a small volume of blood.

A Comparative Study of SEER Sonorheometry Versus Standard Coagulation Tests, Rotational Thromboelastometry, and Multiple Electrode Aggregometry in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Coagulation point-of-care tests for the diagnosis and management of bleeding commonly are used in cardiac surgery. Recently, a new viscoelastic point-of-care device, Quantra (HemoSonics, Charlottesville, VA), which is based on sonic estimation of elasticity via resonance sonorheometry, entered the market. Prior studies have compared the Quantra parameters with conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastography, but no study has assessed the correlation of the platelet-derived Quantra parameter platelet contribution to stiffness (PCS) with platelet function assays. The present study compared the Quantra-derived coagulation parameters with conventional coagulation tests, rotational thromboelastography-derived parameters, and platelet function measured using multiplate aggregometry. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University research hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 30 cardiac surgery patients before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Quantra clot stiffness showed a very strong correlation with the EXTEM maximum clot firmness before and after cardiopulmonary bypass and in the overall samples (r values 0.94-0.96). Quantra fibrinogen contribution to stiffness was compared with the corresponding FIBTEM and Clauss fibrinogen levels, which also showed a strong level of correlation (r values between 0.74 and 0.87). Quantra PCS strongly correlated with platelet count (r = 0.71) in the overall samples and moderately with adenosine diphosphate-dependent platelet function (r = 0.67). In a multivariable model, both the adenosine diphosphate test value and the platelet count remained independently associated with Quantra PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrinogen-dependent clot stiffness properties are well-reflected by the Quantra fibrinogen contribution to stiffness parameter, and PCS incorporates platelet count and function.

Effectiveness of Platelet Function Analyzer-100 for Laboratory Detection of Anti-Platelet Drug-Induced Platelet Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is the phenomenon wherein patients exhibit normal platelet activity in laboratory testing despite adequate adherence to anti-platelet treatment. We investigated the detection rates of Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 (Dade Behring AG, Düdingen, Switzerland) for drug-induced platelet dysfunction and analyzed potential contributors to HTPR with practical PFA-100 data over six years. METHODS: We used data from 6,957 patients who underwent PFA-100 testing after receiving aspirin, clopidogrel, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Of these, 6,163 patients were tested with only the collagen/epinephrine cartridge (Col/EPI) of PFA-100; 794 were tested with both Col/EPI and the collagen/ADP cartridge (Col/ADP). We calculated PFA-100 closure time (CT) for each drug and compared the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients with prolonged CTs and normal CTs (i.e., HTPR). RESULTS: In Col/EPI, 73.2% (365/499), 72.6% (390/537), and 55.3% (3,442/6,228) patients showed prolonged CTs for aspirin, clopidogrel, and NSAIDs, respectively. In Col/ADP, prolonged CTs were observed in 37.4% (34/91), 43.2% (35/81), and 29.6% (200/676) of patients receiving aspirin, clopidogrel, and NSAIDs, respectively. Of the patients tested with both cartridges, 88.9% (48/54), 95.3% (41/43), and 89.0% (577/648) of the patients receiving aspirin, clopidogrel, and NSAIDs had prolonged CTs, and 10.0% (79/794) showed normal CTs regardless of drugs. For clopidogrel users (both cartridges), there were more patients with malignancies in the normal CT than prolonged CT group. CONCLUSIONS: PFA-100 is not sufficiently effective for laboratory screening of drug-induced platelet dysfunction. Malignancy may contribute to clopidogrel-related HTPR in PFA-100.

The assessment of platelet function using multiple electrode aggregometry in practical procedures in anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Platelets are responsible for primary haemostasis. Patients with suspected platelet dysfunction require prompt clinical assessment when qualifying for emergency surgical procedures. The purpose of this article is to present our experience in platelet function assessment using whole-blood multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in various clinical conditions. CASE REPORTS: Retrospective analysis of three patients with thrombocytopathy associated with normal platelet counts was performed using standard laboratory tests complemented by MEA. In two cases, platelet dysfunction was due to antiplatelet drugs, while in one other case it was caused by chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthesiologists strive to make the perioperative period as safe as possible. Platelet function assessment should be considered in every patient in whom haemostatic disturbances are suspected. MEA provides support for clinical decision-making, especially in patients who undergo haemodialysis or require antiplatelet therapy, and are in need of emergency surgery.

Not all light transmission aggregation assays are created equal: qualitative differences between light transmission and 96-well plate aggregometry.

In this short article, submitted as part of the review on platelet function testing, we illustrate the quantitative and qualitative differences between classical light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and 96-well plate aggregometry. We show that responses to platelet agonists and antagonists differ depending upon the method of aggregation testing. For example, in 96-well aggregometry, responses to collagen are strongly inhibited by P2Y12 receptor antagonists while in LTA they are much less affected. Furthermore, we explore the importance of differences in the mechanical environment upon platelet aggregation. We emphasize that LTA and 96-well aggregometry are not interchangeable assays. These two assays are best used as complementary tests to explore platelet function in depth.

Comparison of Multiplate, Platelet Function Analyzer-200, and Plateletworks in Healthy Dogs Treated with Aspirin and Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Platelet function testing may be warranted to assess response to aspirin and clopidogrel. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of aspirin, clopidogrel, or combination therapy using 3 platelet function tests: Multiplate Analyzer (MP), Platelet Function Analyzer-200 (PFA), and Plateletworks (PW). ANIMALS: Six healthy laboratory Beagles. METHODS: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study (crossover design). Dogs were given aspirin 1 mg/kg, clopidogrel 2 mg/kg, or combination therapy for 1 week each, with a washout period of 2 weeks. Platelet function was assessed on days 0 and 7 of each phase using MP (adenosine diphosphate [ADP], arachidonic acid [AA], collagen [COL] agonists), PFA (P2Y, COL-ADP [CADP], COL-Epinephrine [CEPI] cartridges), and PW (ADP, AA, COL agonists). Platelet counts were obtained with impedance and optical counters. RESULTS: For MP, mean aggregation was decreased for COL and AA with combination therapy and for ADP with all treatments. For PFA, mean CT was increased for the CEPI cartridge with aspirin; and for the P2Y and CADP cartridges with clopidogrel or combination therapy. More dogs receiving clopidogrel showed an increase in PFA CT using the P2Y than the CADP cartridge. For PW, mean aggregation was decreased for AA with all treatments; for ADP with clopidogrel or combination therapy; and for COL with clopidogrel. The PW results with the 2 hematology counters showed almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: All platelet function tests detected treatment effects in some dogs and may have utility for monitoring therapy.

Pilot study of novel lab methodology and testing of platelet function in adolescent women with heavy menstrual bleeding.

BackgroundApproximately 40% of adolescent women experience heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), and 10-62% of them have an underlying bleeding disorder (BD). Diagnosing a BD remains challenging because of limitations of available clinical platelet function assays. The aim of this study was to characterize platelet function in a population of adolescent women with HMB using small-volume whole-blood assays.MethodsAnticoagulated whole blood was used to assess platelet GPIIbIIIa activation, α-granule secretion, and aggregation in response to multiple agonists. Platelet adhesion on collagen or von Willebrand Factor (VWF) under static and shear flow was also assessed.ResultsFifteen participants with HMB were included in the study, of which eight were diagnosed with a clinically identifiable BD. Platelet activation was blunted in response to calcium ionophore in participants without a BD diagnosis compared with that in all other participants. Impaired GPIIbIIIa activation was observed in response to all GPCR agonists, except adenosine diphosphate (ADP), in participants with qualitative platelet disorders. Our assays detected platelet aggregation in the majority of participants with a BD in response to ADP, collagen-related peptide (CRP), thrombin receptor activator 6 (TRAP-6), or U46619. Platelet adhesion and aggregation on collagen and VWF was decreased for participants with VWD.ConclusionParticipants with and without BD exhibited aberrant platelet function in several assays in response to select agonists.

Platelet function investigation by flow cytometry: Sample volume, needle size, and reference intervals.

Flow cytometry is an increasingly used method for platelet function analysis because it has some important advantages compared with other platelet function tests. Flow cytometric platelet function analyses only require a small sample volume (3.5 mL); however, to expand the field of applications, e.g., for platelet function analysis in children, even smaller volumes are needed. Platelets are easily activated, and the size of the needle for blood sampling might be of importance for the pre-activation of the platelets. Moreover, to use flow cytometry for investigation of platelet function in clinical practice, a reference interval is warranted. The aims of this work were 1) to determine if small volumes of whole blood can be used without influencing the results, 2) to examine the pre-activation of platelets with respect to needle size, and 3) to establish reference intervals for flow cytometric platelet function assays. To examine the influence of sample volume, blood was collected from 20 healthy individuals in 1.0 mL, 1.8 mL, and 3.5 mL tubes. To examine the influence of the needle size on pre-activation, blood was drawn from another 13 healthy individuals with both a 19- and 21-gauge needle. For the reference interval study, 78 healthy adults were included. The flow cytometric analyses were performed on a NAVIOS flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, Florida) investigating the following activation-dependent markers on the platelet surface; bound-fibrinogen, CD63, and P-selectin (CD62p) after activation with arachidonic acid, ristocetin, adenosine diphosphate, thrombin-receptor-activating-peptide, and collagen. The study showed that a blood volume as low as 1.0 mL can be used for platelet function analysis by flow cytometry and that both a 19- and 21-gauge needle can be used for blood sampling. In addition, reference intervals for platelet function analyses by flow cytometry were established.

Light transmission aggregometry using pre-coated microtiter plates and a Victor X5 plate reader.

BACKGROUND: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) can be performed with microtiter plates (96-well LTA). When conducting LTA, an agonist is added to platelet-rich plasma and the sample is shaken for minutes after which absorbance readings are done. Platelet aggregation is detected as decrease in absorbance. However, the classical method is cumbersome and therefore microtiter plates can be used for concomitant testing of multiple samples. Furthermore, it would be convenient to prepare the plate in advance of platelet aggregation testing. Aim: The aim of the present study was to establish a simplified 96-well LTA protocol, where plates were pre-coated with agonists and stored at -80 C until use. RESULTS: We developed and validated a protocol for 96-well LTA using a Victor X5 plate reader and pre-coated microtiter plates. The minimum requirement of platelet-rich plasma was 45 µL per sample and the sample platelet count should not be below 100 x109/L. Optimal absorbance reading was 595 nm wavelengths. Platelet aggregation results were higher at 37°C than at room temperature. Platelet adherence to wells after stimulation was observed; it was not avoided by pre-coating of the wells with gelatin. A range of up to 7 concentrations for each agonist (collagen, arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, thrombin receptor-activating peptide and protease-activated receptor-4) was tested concomitantly. A transient rise in platelet aggregation was observed after 2 minutes of shaking in some samples with low agonist concentration, and platelet aggregation was optimal after 10 minutes of shaking for samples with high agonist concentration. Plates could be stored at -80°C for 15 days without significant change in the platelet aggregation results. CONCLUSION: The 96-well LTA is suitable for platelet aggregation testing and a range of agonist concentrations can be concomitantly tested.

Platelet Function Tests: Preanalytical Variables, Clinical Utility, Advantages, and Disadvantages.

Platelet function tests are mainly used in the diagnostic work-up of platelet disorders. During the last decade, the additional use of platelet function tests to evaluate the effect of antiplatelet therapy has also emerged in an attempt to identify patients with an increased risk of arterial thrombosis. Furthermore, platelet function tests are increasingly used to measure residual effect of antiplatelet therapy prior to surgery with the aim of reducing the risk of bleeding. To a limited extend, platelet function tests are also used to evaluate hyperaggregability as a potential marker of a prothrombotic state outside the setting of antiplatelet therapy. This multifaceted use of platelet function tests and the development of simpler point-of-care tests with narrower application have increased the use of platelet function testing and also facilitated the use of platelet function tests outside the highly specialized laboratories. The present chapter describes the preanalytical variables, which should be taken into account when planning platelet function testing. Also, the most widely used platelet function tests are introduced, and their clinical utility and their relative advantages and disadvantages are discussed.