Diuretic Tolerance to Repeated-Dose Furosemide in Infants Born Very Preterm with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the presence and timing of furosemide diuretic tolerance in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and to determine if tolerance is modified by thiazide co-administration. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study among infants born very preterm with BPD exposed to repeated-dose furosemide for 72 hours, measuring net fluid balance (total intake minus total output) as a surrogate of diuresis in the 3 days before and after exposure. The primary comparison was the difference in fluid balance between the first and third 24 hours of furosemide exposure. We fit a general linear model for within-subject repeated measures of fluid balance over time, with thiazide co-administration as an interaction variable. Secondary analyses included an evaluation of weight trajectories over time. RESULTS: In 83 infants, median fluid balance ranged between + 43.6 and + 52.7 ml/kg/d in the 3 days prior to furosemide exposure. Fluid balance decreased to a median of + 29.1 ml/kg/d in the first 24 hours after furosemide, but then increased to +47.5 ml/kg/d by the third 24-hour interval, consistent with tolerance (P < .001). Thiazides did not modify the change in fluid balance during furosemide exposure for any time-period. Weight decreased significantly in the first 24 hours after furosemide and increased thereafter (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The net fluid balance response to furosemide decreases rapidly during repeated-dose exposures in infants with BPD, consistent with diuretic tolerance. Clinicians should consider this finding in the context of an infant's therapeutic goals. Further research efforts to identify safe and effective furosemide dosage strategies are needed.

Comparison of Class-Specific Side Effects Across Preventative Pharmacologic Therapies for Kidney Stone Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical guidelines recommend monitoring for metabolic derangements while on preventive pharmacologic therapy for kidney stone disease. The study objective was to compare the frequency of side effects among patients receiving alkali citrate, thiazides, and allopurinol. METHODS: Using claims data from working-age adults with kidney stone disease (2008-2019), we identified those with a new prescription for alkali citrate, thiazide, or allopurinol within 12 months after their index stone-related diagnosis or procedure. We fit multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for cohort characteristics like comorbid illness and medication adherence, to estimate 2-year measured frequencies of claims-based outcomes of acute kidney injury, falls/hip fracture, gastritis, abnormal liver function tests/hepatitis, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia/diabetes, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and hypotension. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 1776 (34%), 2767 (53%), and 677 (13%) patients prescribed alkali citrate, thiazides, or allopurinol, respectively. Comparing unadjusted rates of incident diagnoses, thiazides compared to alkali citrate and allopurinol were associated with the highest rates of hypercalcemia (2.3% vs 1.5% and 1.0%, respectively, P = .04), hypokalemia (6% vs 3% and 2%, respectively, P < .01), and hyperglycemia/diabetes (17% vs 11% and 16%, respectively, P < .01). No other differences with the other outcomes were significant. In adjusted analyses, compared to alkali citrate, thiazides were associated with a higher odds of hypokalemia (OR=2.01, 95% CI 1.44-2.81) and hyperglycemia/diabetes (OR=1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.83), while allopurinol was associated with a higher odds of hyperglycemia/diabetes (OR=1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.75). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence to support clinical guidelines that recommend periodic serum testing to assess for adverse effects from preventive pharmacologic therapy.

Mortality and Morbidity Among Individuals With Hypertension Receiving a Diuretic, ACE Inhibitor, or Calcium Channel Blocker: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The long-term relative risk of antihypertensive treatments with regard to mortality and morbidity is not well understood. Objective: To determine the long-term posttrial risk of primary and secondary outcomes among trial participants who were randomized to either a thiazide-type diuretic, calcium channel blocker (CCB), or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with up to 23 years of follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified secondary analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), a multicenter randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial, followed up with participants aged 55 years or older with a diagnosis of hypertension and at least 1 other coronary heart disease risk factor for up to 23 years, from February 23, 1994, to December 31, 2017. Trial participants were linked with administrative databases for posttrial mortality (N = 32 804) and morbidity outcomes (n = 22 754). Statistical analysis was performed from January 2022 to October 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a thiazide-type diuretic (n = 15 002), a CCB (n = 8898), or an ACE inhibitor (n = 8904) for planned in-trial follow-up of approximately 4 to 8 years and posttrial passive follow-up for up to 23 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, combined fatal and nonfatal (morbidity) CVD, and both mortality and morbidity for coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and cancer. Results: A total of 32 804 participants (mean [SD] age, 66.9 [7.7] years; 17 411 men [53.1%]; and 11 772 Black participants [35.9%]) were followed up for all-cause mortality and a subgroup of 22 754 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [7.2] years; 12 772 women [56.1%]; and 8199 Black participants [36.0%]) were followed up for fatal or nonfatal CVD through 2017 (mean [SD] follow-up, 13.7 [6.7] years; maximum follow-up, 23.9 years). Cardiovascular disease mortality rates per 100 persons were 23.7, 21.6, and 23.8 in the diuretic, CCB, and ACE inhibitor groups, respectively, at 23 years after randomization (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.89-1.05] for CCB vs diuretic; AHR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.97-1.15] for ACE inhibitor vs diuretic). The long-term risks of most secondary outcomes were similar among the 3 groups. Compared with the diuretic group, the ACE inhibitor group had a 19% increased risk of stroke mortality (AHR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.03-1.37]) and an 11% increased risk of combined fatal and nonfatal hospitalized stroke (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.03-1.20]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial in an adult population with hypertension and coronary heart disease risk factors, CVD mortality was similar between all 3 groups. ACE inhibitors increased the risk of stroke outcomes by 11% compared with diuretics, and this effect persisted well beyond the trial period. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000542.

Association between immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis and concomitant use of thiazide diuretics.

Although an association has been reported between diuretics and myocarditis, it is unclear whether the risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced myocarditis is affected by concomitant diuretics. Thus, the aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of concomitant diuretics on ICI-induced myocarditis. This cross-sectional study used disproportionality analysis and a pharmacovigilance database to assess the risk of myocarditis with various diuretics in patients receiving ICIs via the analysis of data entered into the VigiBase database through December 2022. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for myocarditis in patients who received ICIs. A total of 90 611 patients who received ICIs, including 975 cases of myocarditis, were included as the eligible dataset. A disproportionality in myocarditis was observed for loop diuretic use (reporting odds ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.04, P = .03) and thiazide use (reporting odds ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.20-2.50, P < .01) in patients who received ICIs. The results of the multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the use of thiazides (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.15-2.34, P < .01) was associated with an increased risk of myocarditis in patients who received ICIs. Our findings may help to predict the risk of myocarditis in patients receiving ICIs.

THE NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION IN BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL/METOPROLOL), ACE INHIBITORS (LISINOPRIL/PERINDOPRIL), THIAZIDES DIURETICS (HCT), CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS (AMLODIPINE/FELODIPINE), SARTANS (CANDESARTAN) AND ТHE SUBSEQUENT SKIN CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION: APOCALYPSE NOW.

The problem of contamination of the most commonly used medicines with nitrosamines is worsening worldwide. According to recent literature data, this "contamination" is the cause not only of skin cancer (keratinocytic/melanoma) but also of gastrointestinal neoplasms, brain tumours, neuroblastoma, rectal carcinoma, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and many others. It is these clinical manifestations that are associated with/ or already directly linked to the nitrosamine content of drugs and food products used by patients in previous periods. And it is this permissive availability/contamination that could prove to be the most likely, powerful inducer of acquired mutations underlying the worldwide cancer pandemic. Of further concern is the evidence of contamination of newer classes of medications by nitrosamines- namely: beta blockers, calcium antagonists and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In practice, mankind faces the problem of certainly over 1 billion patients taking nitrosamine-contaminated drugs: 280 million patients with depression (antidepressants), over 1 billion patients with arterial hypertension (antihypertensive drugs), over half a billion patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (oral antidiabetic drugs/metformin/ sitagliptin), over 4 billion patients with gastritis (ranitidine), over 5 million with tuberculosis (rifampicin), and probably a number of others. The calculations are apocalyptic, since even if only 20-30% of the groups were affected, the number of patients taking these drugs would, by a rough calculation, currently amount to over 1 billion. And there are certainly other classes of drugs yet to be announced. It is for this reason that we should not be surprised that the data on the development of keratinocyte cancer after intake of nitrosamine-contaminated preparations is growing at a breakneck pace. This data indirectly but strongly confirms the importance of a newly introduced concept in the medical science : Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer. A concept, until recently unknown, incomprehensible, but at the same time frightening and gradually accepted, imposing itself and which with each passing day is gaining more and more scientific significance and "visibility", "scientific tangibility, receptivity, and acceptability." This article presents, for the first time in the world literature, patients who developed single/multiple forms of keratinocytic cancer (partly in combination with melanoma precursors-dysplastic moles) after administration of two new classes of potentially nitrosamine-contaminated antihypertensive drugs: beta blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol) and calcium antagonists (amlodipine, felodipine). For the first time in the scientific literature, the contributory pro-carcinogenic role of another potentially nitrosamine-contaminated ACE inhibitor- lisinopril , as well as that of candesartan: in the development of keratinocytic cancer is also discussed. For the first time in the world literature, the conclusion regarding the pathogenetic relationship between the intake of potentially contaminated drugs (from different drug groups) and cancer development is based on the model of the equivalent clinical manifestation of skin tumors (rather than on controlled long-term prospective analyses). Nitrosamine contamination in these drug groups appears to be the sole and major unifying factor or causative agent for these manifestations.

Association between antihypertensive drugs and hepatocellular carcinoma: A trans-ancestry and drug-target Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Antihypertensive drugs were recently reported to have an oncogenic role in common cancer, however, whether these drugs would affect the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. METHODS: A drug-target Mendelian randomization method was adopted to examine the long-term effect of 12 antihypertensive drugs classes on the risk of HCC in Europeans and East Asians. To proxy antihypertensive drugs, we leveraged genetic variants located near or within drug target genes that were associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP). Genetically proxied drugs associated with reduced risk of coronary artery disease were included in primary analysis. Genetic summary statistics of SBP and HCC were derived from publicly available large-scale genome-wide association studies in Europeans and East Asians respectively. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) of drugs target genes were used to proxy drugs in a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Genetically proxied thiazides and related diuretics were associated with decreased risk of HCC in both Europeans (OR [95% CI]: 0.79 [0.73, 0.86] per 1 mmHg reduction in SBP; p < 0.001) and East Asians (0.60 [0.45, 0.82]; p = 0.001). Genetically proxied beta-adrenoceptor blockers (BBs) were strongly associated with increased risk of HCC in Europeans (1.46 [1.12, 1.91]; p = 0.004). These findings were replicated in deCODE genetics study and remained consistent when using eQTLs to proxy antihypertensive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that thiazides diuretics may lower the risk of HCC in both Europeans and East Asians, while BBs may increase the risk of HCC specifically in Europeans. Further studies are warranted to explore the potential of repurposing or retargeting antihypertensive drugs for HCC prevention.

Thiazide diuretics alone or combined with potassium-sparing diuretics to treat hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and decrease of the adverse effects of thiazide diuretics provided by potassium-sparing diuretics remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the BP-lowering efficacy and the incidence of adverse effects of high (T+) and low-dose (T-) thiazide diuretics, alone or combined with high (PS+) or low-dose (PS-) potassium-sparing diuretics in patients with primary hypertension. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS. Randomized double-blind placebo or active-controlled trials (RCT) with 3 weeks to 1 year of follow-up were included. Sample size, mean and standard deviation from baseline, follow-up and change from baseline values were extracted by two independent reviewers. Pairwise random effect models and Bayesian network meta-analysis models were used to compare the effects of treatments. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Rob 1.0 tool. The primary outcome was the mean difference in office SBP. Secondary outcomes were the mean difference in biochemical parameters and the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-six double-blind RCTs involving 58 807 participants (mean age: 55 years; 45% women) were included. All treatment groups were more effective than placebo in lowering BP, with mean differences (MDs) of change from baseline ranging from -7.66 mmHg [95% credible interval (95% CrI), -8.53 to -6.79] for T- to -12.77 mmHg (95% CrI, -15.22 to -10.31) for T+PS-. T+ alone or combined with potassium-sparing was more effective in reducing BP than T-. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) estimated ranking showed that the best effectiveness in lowering SBP was found for T+PS- (0.69), T+PS+ (0.65) and T+ (0.54). Compared with placebo, all treatments (except T-PS-) were associated with more potassium reduction and T+ compared with all other treatments and T- when compared with T-PS-. Compared with placebo, all active treatments (except T+PS+) showed higher elevations of uric acid. The increase of plasma glucose promoted by thiazides alone was reduced by potassium-sparing agents. CONCLUSION: Thiazides with potassium-sparing diuretics are associated with increased BP-lowering efficacy compared with thiazides alone while minimizing hypokalaemia and hyperglycaemia. These findings demonstrate that thiazide and potassium-sparing diuretic combination is preferable to thiazide alone in treating hypertension.

Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Case Series: Thiazide-Induced Hypokalemia.

Introduction The patient was a 72-year-old man with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and oropharyngeal cancer. His home medications include amlodipine, atorvastatin, hydrochlorothiazide, and tamsulosin. He lives alone and eats a soft, bland, nutrient-poor diet. During his annual primary care visit, he is found to have a serum potassium level of 3.3 mEq/L (reference range 3.5-5.0). Assessment The use of hydrochlorothiazide, a thiazide diuretic, as well as his low consumption of dietary potassium, have likely contributed to his mild, asymptomatic hypokalemia. Outcome The patient's serum potassium normalizes following replenishment with a 10 mEq microencapsulated potassium chloride (KCl) extended release (ER) tablet three times a day with meals for one week. A registered dietitian was consulted to provide recommendations for a well-balanced diet, consistent with his dietary texture needs. Conclusions Hypokalemia is a commonly encountered electrolyte disorder, occurring in about 3 to 4% of community-dwelling elders.1 Though asymptomatic hypokalemia is often an incidental finding, it is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events if left untreated and thus should be promptly corrected when discovered.².

Interleukin 6 mediated activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor in the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron.

Hypertension is characterized by increased sodium (Na+) reabsorption along the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron (ASDN) as well as chronic systemic inflammation. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is thought to be a mediator of this inflammatory process. Interestingly, increased Na+ reabsorption within the ASDN does not always correlate with increases in aldosterone (Aldo), the primary hormone that modulates Na+ reabsorption via the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). Thus, understanding how increased ASDN Na+ reabsorption may occur independent of Aldo stimulation is critical. Here, we show that IL-6 can activate the MR by activating Rac1 and stimulating the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) with a consequent increase in thiazide-sensitive Na+ uptake. Using an in vitro model of the distal convoluted tubule (DCT2), mDCT15 cells, we observed nuclear translocation of eGFP-tagged MR after IL-6 treatment. To confirm the activation of downstream transcription factors, mDCT15 cells were transfected with mineralocorticoid response element (MRE)-luciferase reporter constructs; then treated with vehicle, Aldo, or IL-6. Aldosterone or IL-6 treatment increased luciferase activity that was reversed with MR antagonist cotreatment, but IL-6 treatment was reversed by Rac1 inhibition or ROS reduction. In both mDCT15 and mpkCCD cells, IL-6 increased amiloride-sensitive transepithelial Na+ current. ROS and IL-6 increased 22Na+ uptake via the thiazide-sensitive sodium chloride cotransporter (NCC). These results are the first to demonstrate that IL-6 can activate the MR resulting in MRE activation and that IL-6 increases NCC-mediated Na+ reabsorption, providing evidence for an alternative mechanism for stimulating ASDN Na+ uptake during conditions where Aldo-mediated MR stimulation may not occur.

Current antihypertensive treatment and treatment-resistant hypertension in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is an important prognostic predictor in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the recommended target blood pressure has been continuously revised. This study aimed to reveal the current antihypertensive practices in Japanese patients with CKD. METHODS: In the Fukuoka Kidney disease Registry, we extracted 3664 non-dialysis-dependent patients with CKD. Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) was defined as a failure of blood-pressure control treated with three antihypertensive medication classes or a treatment with ≥ 4 classes regardless of blood pressure. The blood-pressure control complied with the target blood pressure recommended by the KDIGO 2012 guideline. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 67 years, body mass index (BMI) was 23 kg/m2, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 40 mL/min/1.73 m2. The number of patients with unachieved blood-pressure control was 1933, of whom 26% received ≥ 3 classes of antihypertensive medications. The first choice of medication was renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, followed by calcium-channel blockers. The rate of thiazide use was low in all CKD stages (3-11%). The prevalence of aTRH was 16%, which was significantly associated with BMI (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] per 1-standard deviation change, 1.38 [1.25-1.53]), decreased eGFR (1.87 [1.57-2.23]), as well as age, diabetes mellitus, and chronic heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: Renal dysfunction and obesity are important risk factors of aTRH. Even under nephrologist care, most patients were treated with insufficient antihypertensive medications. It is important to prescribe sufficient classes of antihypertensive medications, including diuretics, and to improve patients' lifestyle habits.

Revisiting diuretic choice in chronic kidney disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Existing guidelines offer little direction about the use of thiazide and loop diuretics in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This review summarizes recent studies impacting indications and safety considerations for these agents in patients with CKD. RECENT FINDINGS: Chlorthalidone reduces blood pressure compared to placebo in patients with advanced CKD, challenging the belief that thiazide diuretics lose efficacy at lower glomerular filtration rates (GFR). Existing studies show no clear impact of thiazide or loop diuretic use on kidney or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD. Sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have diuretic effects, but concomitant use of a diuretic does not diminish the preventive benefits of these agents against acute kidney injury (AKI). Despite theoretical concerns, thiazide diuretics likely do not worsen circulating vasopressin levels or cyst progression in polycystic kidney disease and may be useful for alleviating polyuria from tolvaptan. Diuretics cause multiple adverse effects, including electrolyte abnormalities, hemodynamic-mediated decrease in estimated GFR, and AKI. SUMMARY: Recent evidence supports expanded indications for diuretics in patients with kidney disease, including chlorthalidone for hypertension in advanced CKD. Monitoring electrolytes and estimated GFR is critical to ensure patient safety when prescribing these agents for patients with CKD.

Associations of thiazide use with skin cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous findings on the associations of thiazide use with skin cancers were conflicting. This study aimed to examine the associations of individual thiazide use with skin cancer risk, differentiated by subtypes of skin cancers, geographic regions, and cumulative doses of individual thiazides. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies on January 5, 2022, scanned the references of included studies, and consulted experts. We included case-control and cohort studies or randomized trials reporting the associations of individual thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics use with skin cancers. Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and melanoma were analysed separately. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted for pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) for skin cancers related to individual thiazide use. RESULTS: We included 15, 5, and 5 case-control or cohort studies reporting the risk for skin cancers associated with hydrochlorothiazide, bendroflumethiazide, and indapamide use, respectively, with 17,848,313 participants. The meta-analysis showed associations of hydrochlorothiazide use with increased risk of NMSC (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.24; HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.54), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.65; HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.97-2.67), and melanoma (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93-1.14). The increased risks for SCC were associated with high cumulative doses of hydrochlorothiazide (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.43-4.57; HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.45). Hydrochlorothiazide use was associated with different subtypes of melanoma including superficial spreading (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33), nodular (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.39), and lentigo maligna melanoma (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08-1.65). Various cumulative doses of hydrochlorothiazide were associated with increased odds for melanoma. However, the associations of hydrochlorothiazide use with increased risk of NMSC and melanoma only appeared in non-Asian countries. No meaningful increase in the risk for skin cancers was associated with bendroflumethiazide and indapamide. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrochlorothiazide is associated with an increased risk for NMSC (especially SCC) and melanoma in non-Asian countries, whereas bendroflumethiazide and indapamide are not associated with a meaningful risk for skin cancers. Healthcare professionals and patients should be informed of the different risk profiles of skin cancers associated with different thiazides, cumulative doses, and regions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021234317 .

What Dermatologists Should Know About Thiazides. / Tiazidas: lo que el dermatólogo debería saber.

Hydrochlorothiazide and other thiazide diuretics have been used for decades to treat high blood pressure, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Thiazides have been linked to photosensitivity with heterogeneous clinical manifestations and recovery times. Diagnosis can be aided by phototesting, photopatch testing, and skin biopsy. Long-term use of hydrochlorothiazide has been linked to an increased dose-dependent risk of certain types of skin cancer in recent years. In this review, we also look at other less common or lesser-known adverse effects of thiazide diuretics that have been described in isolated reports.

Comparison of Empiric Preventative Pharmacologic Therapies on Stone Recurrence Among Patients with Kidney Stone Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of stone-related events among patients receiving thiazides, alkali citrate, and allopurinol without prior 24 h urine testing.  It is unknown whether 1 preventative pharmacological therapy (PPT) medication class is more beneficial for reducing kidney stone recurrence when prescribed empirically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using medical claims data from working-age adults with kidney stone disease diagnoses (2008-2018), we identified those prescribed thiazides, alkali citrate, or allopurinol. We excluded those who received 24 h urine testing prior to initiating PPT and those with less than 3 years of follow-up. We fit multivariable regression models to estimate the association between the occurrence of a stone-related event (emergency department visit, hospitalization, or surgery for stones) and PPT medication class. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 1834 (60%), 654 (21%), and 558 (18%) patients empirically prescribed thiazides, alkali citrate, or allopurinol, respectively. After controlling for patient factors including medication adherence and concomitant conditions that increase recurrence risk, the adjusted rate of any stone event was lowest for the thiazide group (14.8%) compared to alkali citrate (20.4%) or allopurinol (20.4%) (each P < .001). Thiazides, compared to allopurinol, were associated with 32% lower odds of a subsequent stone event by 3 years (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88). No such association was observed when comparing alkali citrate to allopurinol (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75-1.34). CONCLUSION: Empiric PPT with thiazides is associated with significantly lower odds of subsequent stone-related events. When 24 h urine testing is unavailable, thiazides may be preferred over alkali citrate or allopurinol for empiric PPT.

Photoinduced skin reactions of cardiovascular drugs-a systematic review.

This systemic review aims to provide a practical overview of the prevalence, clinical manifestation, and management of adverse photoinduced skin reactions caused by frequently used cardiovascular drugs and to assess their potential relevance for skin cancer development. Data search included PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies reporting the photosensitizing and/or skin cancer-inducing properties of common cardiovascular drugs was performed and a guide to clinical management of photoinduced skin eruptions by cardiovascular drugs was provided. Study quality was assessed for major methodological biases. A total of 58 studies were identified (i.e. 23 case reports, 14 observational studies, 10 review articles, 10 experimental studies, and 1 meta-analysis). Most commonly, drug-associated adverse photoinduced cutaneous reactions were caused by phototoxic and photoallergic mechanisms. There is evidence suggesting that amiodarone and dronedarone, thiazide diuretics, thiazide-like diuretics, angiotensin receptor blockers, dihydropyridine-type calcium channel blockers, and certain angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins may cause photoinduced adverse cutaneous reactions. Other drugs such as anticoagulants, antiplatelets, aldosterone antagonists, and fibrates have not been linked with photosensitizing reactions or adverse cutaneous reactions. Some drugs, i.e. thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics, were associated with an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancers (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma). Certain commonly used cardiovascular drugs have been associated with adverse photoinduced cutaneous reactions. If they occur, further diagnosis and treatment might be needed, depending on the severity and progress. Whether photosensitizing drugs increase the risk of skin cancer remains elusive and further randomized controlled trials are required.

Thiazide and other Cl-benzenesulfonamide-bearing clinical drug affinities for human carbonic anhydrases.

Twelve carbonic anhydrase (CA) isoforms catalyze carbon dioxide hydration to bicarbonate and acid protons and are responsible for many biological functions in human body. Despite their vital functions, they are also responsible for, or implicated in, numerous ailments and diseases such as glaucoma, high altitude sickness, and cancer. Because CA isoforms are highly homologous, clinical drugs designed to inhibit enzymatic activity of a particular isoform, can also bind to others with similar affinity causing toxic side effects. In this study, the affinities of twelve CA isoforms have been determined for nineteen clinically used drugs used to treat hypertension related diseases, i.e. thiazides, indapamide, and metolazone. Their affinities were determined using a fluorescent thermal shift assay. Stopped flow assay and isothermal titration calorimetry were also employed on a subset of compounds and proteins to confirm inhibition of CA enzymatic activity and verify the quantitative agreement between different assays. The findings of this study showed that pharmaceuticals could bind to human CA isoforms with variable affinities and inhibit their catalytic activity, even though the drug was intended to interact with a different (non-CA) protein target. Relatively minor structural changes of the compounds may cause significant changes in affinity and selectivity for a particular CA isoform.

Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics in nephrolithiasis / Diuréticos tiazídicos e tiazídicos-like na nefrolitíase

Abstract Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics are widely used for the management of hypercalciuria among stone-forming patients. Although the effects of different thiazides should be relatively similar in terms of prevention of stone recurrence, their potency and side effects may differ. However, there is scarce data concerning the metabolic and bone effects of these agents among recurrent nephrolithiasis patients with hypercalciuria. The aim of this update article was to compare our experience in the use of thiazide and thiazide- like diuretics with that of the current literature, concerning their anticalciuric properties and consequent reduction of recurrent stone formation. Their impact on bone mass and potential side effects were also discussed.

Resumo Diuréticos tiazídicos e tiazídicos-like são amplamente usados para o tratamento da hipercalciúria em pacientes com formação de cálculos. Embora os efeitos dos diferentes tiazídicos devam ser relativamente semelhantes em termos de prevenção da recorrência do cálculo, sua potência e efeitos colaterais podem ser diferentes. No entanto, há poucos dados sobre os efeitos metabólicos e ósseos desses agentes em pacientes com nefrolitíase recorrente com hipercalciúria. O objetivo deste artigo de atualização foi comparar nossa experiência quanto ao uso de tiazídicos e tiazídicos-like com a publicada na literatura atual, no que diz respeito às suas propriedades anticalciúricas e consequente redução da formação de cálculos recorrentes. Discutimos também seu impacto na massa óssea e potenciais efeitos colaterais.

Risk of skin cancer in new users of thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics: a cohort study using an active comparator group.

BACKGROUND: Case-control studies report a dose-dependent increased risk of skin cancer in users of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs. nonusers. The degree to which other thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics (TZs) are associated with skin cancer is less certain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of skin cancer in new users of different TZs compared with new users of calcium channel blockers (CCBs). METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using a UK primary-care database (1998-2017), including 271 154 new TZ users [87·6% bendroflumethiazide (BFT), 5·8% indapamide and 3·6% HCTZ] and 275 263 CCB users. The outcomes were basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM). We estimated incidence rates (IRs) and IR ratios (IRRs) in short-term (< 20 prescriptions) and long-term (≥ 20 prescriptions) users of TZs and CCBs using negative binomial regression, and calculated rate differences (RDs) for selected results. We used fine stratification on the propensity score (PS) to control for 23 baseline covariates. RESULTS: Long-term use of HCTZ increased absolute and relative risks of SCC [PS-weighted IRR 1·95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·87-2·02; RD per 100 000 person-years 87.4], but not of BCC or CMM. Long-term use of indapamide was associated with an increased incidence of CMM (IRR 1·43; 95% CI 1·35-1·50). BFT was not meaningfully associated with the risk of any type of skin cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our results corroborate the previously reported increased risk of SCC (but not of BCC or CMM) for long-term use of HCTZ. BFT may be a safer alternative for patients at increased risk of skin cancer.

Comparison of Selective Versus Empiric Pharmacologic Preventative Therapy With Kidney Stone Recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of an empiric approach to metabolic stone prevention. METHODS: Using medical claims from a cohort of working age adults with kidney stone diagnoses (2008-2017), we identified the subset who were prescribed thiazides, alkali therapy, or allopurinol-collectively known as preventive pharmacologic therapy (PPT). We distinguished between those who had 24-hour urine testing prior to initiating PPT (selective therapy) from those without it (empiric therapy). We conducted a survival analysis for time to first recurrence for stone-related events, including ED visits, hospitalizations, and surgery, up to 2 years after initiating PPT. RESULTS: Of 10,125 patients identified, 2744 (27%) and 7381 (73%) received selective and empiric therapy, respectively. The overall frequency of any stone-related event was 11%, and this did not differ between the 2 groups on bivariate analysis (P = .29). After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, medication class, and adherence, there was no difference in the hazard of a stone-related event between the selective and empiric therapy groups (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.12). When considered individually, the frequency of ED visits, hospitalizations, and surgeries did not differ between groups. Greater adherence to PPT and older age were associated with a lower hazard of a stone-related event (both P < .05). CONCLUSION: Compared to empiric therapy, PPT guided by 24-hour urine testing, on average, is not associated with a lower hazard of a stone-related event. These results suggest a need to identify kidney stone patients who benefit from 24-hour urine testing.