Elevated High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Level Enhances the Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Platelet Reactivity in PCI Patients Treated with Clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the effect of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on thrombogenesis has aroused great interest, while inflammation has been reported to modify the Lp(a)-associated risks through an unidentified mechanism. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between platelet reactivity with Lp(a) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in percutaneous intervention (PCI) patients treated with clopidogrel. METHODS: Data were collected from 10,724 consecutive PCI patients throughout the year 2013 in Fuwai Hospital. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) were defined as thrombelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet (MAADP) > 47 mm and < 31 mm, respectively. RESULTS: 6615 patients with TEG results were finally enrolled. The mean age was 58.24 ± 10.28 years and 5131 (77.6%) were male. Multivariable logistic regression showed that taking Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L as the reference, isolated Lp(a) elevation [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L] was not significantly associated with HTPR (P = 0.153) or LTPR (P = 0.312). However, the joint elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/L] exhibited enhanced association with both HTPR (OR:1.976, 95% CI 1.677-2.329) and LTPR (OR:0.533, 95% CI 0.454-0.627). CONCLUSIONS: The isolated elevation of Lp(a) level was not an independent indicator for platelet reactivity, yet the concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP levels was significantly associated with increased platelet reactivity. Whether intensified antiplatelet therapy or anti-inflammatory strategies could mitigate the risks in patients presenting combined Lp(a) and hs-CRP elevation requires future investigation.

Analysis of the effect of CYP2C19 gene properties on the anti-platelet aggregation of clopidogrel after carotid artery stenting under network pharmacology.

Antiplatelet therapy is an important factor influencing the postterm patency rate of carotid artery stenting (CAS). Clopidogrel is a platelet aggregation inhibitor mediated by the adenosine diphosphate receptor and is affected by CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in vivo. When the CYP2C19 gene has a nonfunctional mutation, the activity of the encoded enzyme will be weakened or lost, which directly affects the metabolism of clopidogrel and ultimately weakens its antiplatelet aggregation ability. Therefore, based on network pharmacology, analyzing the influence of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on the antiplatelet therapeutic effect of clopidogrel after CAS is highly important for the formulation of individualized clinical drug regimens. The effect of the CYP2C19 gene polymorphism on the antiplatelet aggregation of clopidogrel after CAS was analyzed based on network pharmacology. A total of 100 patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease who were confirmed by the neurology department and required CAS treatment were studied. CYP2C19 genotyping was performed on all patients via a gene chip. All patients were classified into the wild-type (WT) group (*1/*1), heterozygous mutation (HTM) group (CYP2C19*1/*2, CYP2C19*1/*3), and homozygous mutation (HMM) group (CYP2C19*2/*2, CYP2C19*2/*3, and CYP2C19*3/*3). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was used to detect the blood concentration of clopidogrel and the plasma clopidogrel clearance (CL) rate in different groups of patients before and after clopidogrel treatment. The platelet aggregation rate of patients with different genotypes was measured by turbidimetry. The incidences of clopidogrel resistance (CR) and stent thrombosis in different groups after three months of treatment were analyzed. The results showed that among the different CYP2C19 genotypes, patients from the HTM group accounted for the most patients, while patients from the HTM group accounted for the least patients. Similarly, the clopidogrel CL of patients in the HMM group was lower than that of patients in the WT group and HTM group (P < 0.01). The platelet inhibition rate of patients in the HMM group was evidently inferior to that of patients in the WT group and HTM group (P < 0.01). The incidence of CR and stent thrombosis in the WT group was notably lower than that in the HTM and HMM groups (P < 0.01). These results indicate that the CYP2C19 gene can affect CR occurrence and stent thrombosis after CAS by influencing clopidogrel metabolism and platelet count.

Ticagrelor downregulates the expression of proatherogenic and proinflammatory miR125-b compared to clopidogrel: A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Platelet P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to clopidogrel, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Because activated platelets release proatherogenic and proinflammatory microRNAs, including miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223, we hypothesized that the expression of these miRNAs is lower on ticagrelor, compared to clopidogrel. OBJECTIVES: We compared miR-125a, miR-125b and miR-223 expression in plasma of patients after AMI treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. METHODS: After percutaneous coronary intervention on acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel, 60 patients with first AMI were randomized to switch to ticagrelor or to continue with clopidogrel. Plasma expression of miR-223, miR-125a-5p, miR-125b was measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction at baseline and after 72 h and 6 months of treatment with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in patients and one in 30 healthy volunteers. Multiple electrode aggregometry using ADP test was used to determine platelet reactivity in response to P2Y12 inhibitors. RESULTS: Expression of miR-125b was higher in patients with AMI 72 h and 6 months, compared to healthy volunteers (p = 0.001), whereas expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 were comparable. In patients randomized to ticagrelor, expression of miR-125b decreased at 72 h (p = 0.007) and increased back to baseline at 6 months (p = 0.005). Expression of miR-125a-5p and miR-223 was not affected by the switch from clopidogrel to ticagrelor. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor treatment leads to lower plasma expression of miR-125b after AMI, compared to clopidogrel. Higher expression of miR-125b might explain recurrent thrombotic events and worse clinical outcomes in patients treated with clopidogrel, compared to ticagrelor.

Impact of hemodialysis on efficacies of the antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease patients complicated with end-stage renal disease.

It is controversial whether hemodialysis affects the efficacy of the antiplatelet agents. We aimed to investigate the impact of hemodialysis on efficacies of the antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients complicated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). 86 CAD patients complicated with ESRD requiring hemodialysis were consecutively enrolled. After 5-day treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor, the platelet aggregations induced by arachidonic acid (PLAA) or adenosine diphosphate (PLADP), and the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) were measured before and after hemodialysis. The propensity matching score method was adopted to generate a control group with normal renal function from 2439 CAD patients. In patients taking aspirin, the PLAA remained unchanged after hemodialysis. In patients taking clopidogrel, the PLADP (37.26 ± 17.04 vs. 31.77 ± 16.09, p = 0.029) and corresponding clopidogrel resistance (CR) rate (23 [48.9%] vs. 14 [29.8%], p = 0.022) significantly decreased after hemodialysis, though PRU remained unchanged. Subgroup analysis indicated that PLADP significantly decreased while using polysulfone membrane (36.8 ± 17.9 vs. 31.1 ± 14.5, p = 0.024). In patients taking ticagrelor, PLADP, and PRU remained unchanged after hemodialysis. ESRD patients had higher incidences of aspirin resistance (AR) and CR compared to those with normal renal function (AR: 16.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.001; CR: 48.4% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.024). Hemodialysis does not have negative effect on the efficacies of aspirin, clopidogrel and ticagrelor in ESRD patients with CAD. ESRD patients have higher incidences of AR and CR compared with those with normal renal function.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330223, first registered January 4, 2018.

Immature platelet fraction and immature platelet count as novel biomarkers of elevated platelet reactivity in NSTE-ACS patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Some patients may not respond to such therapy adequately, which is associated with a greater risk of ischemic events. Reticulated platelets are the youngest, largest, and most active platelet subtype. They have been initially shown to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and increased platelet activity. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the presented study was to evaluate whether the immature platelet fraction (IPF) reflects the response to antiplatelet treatment in invasively managed ACS patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled ACS patients treated with PCI and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) comprising acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel or ticagrelor. In all patients, venous blood was collected within 24 h after the procedure. Platelet parameters were measured, including IPF using the Sysmex hematological analyzer and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet reactivity using the Multiplate® Analyzer. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were enrolled, including 62 with ST-segment elevation ACS (STE-ACS) and 46 with non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Of them, 20.4% had diabetes mellitus, 26.9% had a history of MI and 59.2% of smoking. Spearman's correlation analysis demonstrated that higher IPF and immature platelet count (IPC) values are associated with increased ADP-induced platelet reactivity (respectively: rho = 0.387, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.101-0.615, p = 0.008; and rho = 0.458, 95% CI: 0.185-0.666, p = 0.001) in NSTE-ACS but not in STE-ACS patients. CONCLUSION: Immature platelet count and IPF may be valuable markers of platelet activity in patients with NSTE-ACS treated invasively and receiving DAPT (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT06177587).

Aspirin Dosing for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Treated With P2Y12 Inhibitors.

Background The ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness) was a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that found no difference between high- versus low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Whether concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor therapy modifies the effect of aspirin dose on clinical events remains unclear. Methods and Results Participants in ADAPTABLE were stratified according to baseline use of clopidogrel or prasugrel (P2Y12 group). The primary effectiveness end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and the primary safety end point was major bleeding requiring blood transfusions. We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the relative effectiveness and safety of aspirin dose within P2Y12 and non-P2Y12 groups. Of 13 815 (91.6%) participants with available data, 3051 (22.1%) were receiving clopidogrel (2849 [93.4%]) or prasugrel (203 [6.7%]) at baseline. P2Y12 inhibitor use was associated with higher risk of the primary effectiveness end point (10.86% versus 6.31%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 1.22-1.62]) but was not associated with bleeding (0.95% versus 0.53%; adjusted HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.91-2.22]). We found no interaction in the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Overall, dose switching or discontinuation was more common in the high-dose compared with low-dose aspirin group, but the pattern was not modified by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Conclusions In this prespecified analysis of ADAPTABLE, we found that the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin was not modified by baseline P2Y12 inhibitor use. Registration https://www.clinical.trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02697916.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Patient response to P2Y12 inhibitor therapy is heterogeneous, and those with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) are at an increased risk of thrombotic complications. The aim of our study was to determine whether selecting a high-risk patient group of individuals after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) would show the clinical benefit of HTPR testing for preventing thrombotic complications. Blood samples of patients after complex PCI were acquired 1 day and 1 month after the intervention. The samples were tested using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-P) and platelet function assay (PFA). The occurrence of clinically significant stent thrombosis with repeated revascularization of the target vessel was observed over a 1-year period. One day after PCI, 37% of patients had HTPR as established by VASP-P. One month after PCI, the percentage of patients with HTPR decreased to 30.9%. According to PFA, 1 day after PCI, 33.3% of patients had HTPR. This percentage declined to 19.8% after 1 month. All measurements identified a significantly higher proportion of HTPR in patients on clopidogrel compared to ticagrelor and prasugrel. Two cases of early stent thrombosis and 1 case of late stent thrombosis were identified. Further study of adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker on-treatment response in patients undergoing complex PCI is necessary.

Differential inhibition of platelet function by cilostazol in combination with clopidogrel.

PURPOSE: To assess the antiplatelet effect of cilostazol clinically, we compared the effects of cilostazol in combination with clopidogrel on various platelet function tests. METHODS: We recruited patients with ischemic stroke at high risk of recurrence who were treated with clopidogrel alone within 180 days after stroke onset. Subjects underwent baseline platelet function tests, and were then randomly assigned to receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) comprising clopidogrel and cilostazol or clopidogrel monotherapy (SAPT). After 6 months, platelet function was measured again and compared to that at baseline in each group, and the rate of change was compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, but 4 patients were excluded for various reasons. In total, 30 subjects (13 in DAPT and 17 in SAPT group) were analyzed. Adenosine diphosphate- and collagen-induced aggregation, VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (platelet reactivity index: PRI) and plasma p-selectin concentration were significantly lower (P = 0.004, 0.042, 0.049, 0.003 and 0.006 respectively), while VerifyNow % inhibition was significantly higher at 6 months compared to baseline (P = 0.003) in the DAPT group only. Comparison of the rate of change in each parameter from baseline to 6 months showed that while PRI decreased at a greater rate (P = 0.012), VerifyNow % inhibition increased at a greater rate (P = 0.003) in the DAPT group than the SAPT group. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibitory effects of adjunctive cilostazol added to clopidogrel on platelet function differed by type of platelet function test. VerifyNow % inhibition and PRI were more inhibited than the other platelet function tests. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CSPS.com substudy in TWMU (UMIN000026672), registered on April 1, 2017. This study was performed as a substudy of CSPS.com (UMIN000012180, registered on October 31, 2013) and was retrospectively registered.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator Pharmacodynamic Study of Platelet Inhibition with Crushed and Integral Formulations of Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Crushed formulations of specific antiplatelet agents produce earlier and stronger platelet inhibition. We studied the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its relative efficacy compared with integral clopidogrel, crushed and integral ticagrelor. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Overall, 142 patients with suspected ACS were randomly assigned to receive crushed or integral formulations of clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Platelet inhibition at baseline and 1 and 8 h was assessed using the VerifyNow assay. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) ≥ 235 P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) 1 h after the medication loading dose was also determined. RESULTS: The PRU and percentage inhibition median (interquartile range) at 1 h for the different formulations were as follows: crushed clopidogrel: 196.50 (155.50, 246.50), 9.36 (- 1.79, 25.10); integral clopidogrel: 189.50 (159.00, 214.00), 2.32 (- 2.67, 19.89); crushed ticagrelor: 59.00 (10.00, 96.00), 75.53 (49.12, 95.18); and integral ticagrelor: 126.50 (50.00, 168.00), 40.56 (25.59, 78.69). There was no significant difference in PRU or percentage platelet inhibition between the crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel (p = 0.990, p = 0.479); both formulations of ticagrelor were superior to the clopidogrel formulations (p < 0.05). On paired comparison, crushed ticagrelor showed robust early inhibition of platelets compared with the integral formulation (p = 0.03). Crushed clopidogrel exhibited the maximal HTPR of 34.3%, but was < 3% for both formulations of ticagrelor. CONCLUSIONS: The platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel is not superior to integral preparation in patients with ACS. Crushed ticagrelor produced maximal platelet inhibition acutely. HTPR rates in ACS are similar and very low with both formulations of ticagrelor, and maximal with crushed clopidogrel. Clinical Trials Registry of India identifier number CTRI/2020/06/025647.

Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cerebral infarction after dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cerebral infarction after dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Cerebral infarction patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy during January 2019 and December 2021 in Nanchang University Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital were included. Patients were divided into a bleeding group and a nonbleeding group. Propensity score matching was used to match the data between the two groups. The risk factors for cerebral infarction with gastrointestinal bleeding after receiving dual antiplatelet therapy were analyzed by conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 2370 cerebral infarction patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy included in the study. There were significant differences between the bleeding group and the nonbleeding group in terms of sex, age, smoking, drinking, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes and peptic ulcer before matching. After matching, 85 patients were included in the bleeding group and nonbleeding group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex, age, smoking, drinking, previous cerebral infarction, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, gout or peptic ulcer. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that long-term use of aspirin and severity of cerebral infarction were risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in cerebral infarction patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, whereas the use of PPI was a protective factor against gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of aspirin and severity of cerebral infarction are risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in cerebral infarction patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. The use of PPIs could reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Monitoring of Antiplatelet Therapy.

In the late 1990s, the antithrombotic antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced. Around the same time, there was an increase in a number of new methods to measure platelet function (e.g., PFA-100 in 1995), and this has continued. It became evident that not all patients responded to clopidogrel in the same way and that some patients had a relative "resistance" to therapy, termed "high on-treatment platelet reactivity." This then led to some publications to advocate platelet function testing being used for patients on antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing was also suggested for use in patients awaiting cardiac surgery after stopping their antiplatelet therapy as a way of balancing thrombotic risk pre-surgery and bleeding risk perioperatively. This chapter will discuss some of the commonly used platelet function tests used in these settings, particularly those that are sometimes referred to as point-of-care tests or that require minimal laboratory sample manipulation. The latest guidance and recommendations for platelet function testing will be discussed following several clinical trials looking at the usefulness of platelet function testing in these clinical settings.

Synergistic inhibitory effects of clopidogrel and rivaroxaban on platelet function and platelet-dependent thrombin generation in cats.

BACKGROUND: Dual antithrombotic treatment (DAT) with clopidogrel and rivaroxaban sometimes is prescribed to cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at risk of thromboembolism. To date, no studies have evaluated their combined effects on platelet function. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Evaluate the safety of DAT in healthy cats and compare, ex vivo, platelet-dependent thrombin generation and agonist-induced platelet activation and aggregation in cats treated with clopidogrel, rivaroxaban, or DAT. We hypothesized that DAT would safely modulate agonist-induced platelet activation and aggregation more effectively than single agent treatment. ANIMALS: Nine apparently healthy 1-year-old cats selected from a research colony. METHODS: Unblinded, nonrandomized ex vivo cross-over study. All cats received 7 days of rivaroxaban (0.6 ± 0.1 mg/kg PO), clopidogrel (4.7 ± 0.8 mg/kg PO), or DAT with defined washout periods between treatments. Before and after each treatment, adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and thrombin-induced platelet P-selectin expression was evaluated using flow cytometry to assess platelet activation. Platelet-dependent thrombin generation was measured by fluorescence assay. Platelet aggregation was assessed using whole blood impedance platelet aggregometry. RESULTS: No cats exhibited adverse effects. Of the 3 treatments, only DAT significantly decreased the number of activated platelets (P = .002), modulated platelet activation in response to thrombin (P = .01), dampened thrombin generation potential (P = .01), and delayed maximum reaction velocity (P = .004) in thrombin generation. Like clopidogrel, DAT inhibited ADP-mediated platelet aggregation. However, rivaroxaban alone resulted in increased aggregation and activation in response to ADP. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Treatment combining clopidogrel and rivaroxaban (DAT) safely decreases platelet activation, platelet response to agonists, and thrombin generation in feline platelets more effectively than monotherapy with either clopidogrel or rivaroxaban.

Atorvastatin Effect on Clopidogrel Efficacy in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Both clopidogrel and atorvastatin metabolism are rooted in hepatic cytochrome p450 activation. There are published reports of atorvastatin interfering with clopidogrel metabolism by inhibiting the activation of clopidogrel. This in turn would decrease the therapeutic effect of clopidogrel potentially resulting in an increase in thrombotic events in patients who are taking both medications. The emergence of viscoelastic assays, such as Thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM), has been utilized to identify prothrombotic states and may provide insight into a patient's microvascular coagulation profile. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to delineate the differences in platelet function between patients on clopidogrel alone versus those on clopidogrel and atorvastatin in patients that are undergoing peripheral revascularization. METHODS: All patients undergoing revascularization between December 2020 and August 2022 were prospectively evaluated. Patients on clopidogrel and atorvastatin were compared to those on clopidogrel alone. Serial perioperative TEG-PM analysis was performed up to 6 months postoperatively and the platelet function in terms of percent inhibition was evaluated in both groups. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test to identify differences in platelet function. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 182 patients were enrolled. Of this cohort 72 patients met study criteria. 87 samples from the 72 patients were analyzed. 31 (43.05%) patients were on clopidogrel alone and 41 (56.94%) were on clopidogrel and atorvastatin. Patients on clopidogrel alone showed significantly greater platelet inhibition compared to those on clopidogrel and atorvastatin [49.01% vs. 34.54%, P = 0.03]. There was no statistical difference in platelet inhibition between groups in terms of aspirin use alone versus aspirin and atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on clopidogrel and atorvastatin showed significantly less platelet inhibition compared to those on clopidogrel alone, supporting the concept that atorvastatin may interfere with the therapeutic effect of clopidogrel. Patients taking atorvastatin may require an alternative antiplatelet therapy regimen that does not include clopidogrel to achieve adequate thromboprophylaxis.

Impact of continued clopidogrel use on outcomes of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of clopidogrel at the time of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and its association with postoperative complications. METHODS: Single-institution, retrospective review of a prospective database. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, CEA was performed in 1066 consecutive patients (median age, 73 years; 66% men). The indications for operation included ≥70% asymptomatic stenosis (458; 43%), prior stroke (314; 29%), and transient cerebral or retinal ischemia (294; 28%). At the time of operation, 509 (48%) patients were taking aspirin alone, 441 (41%) were taking clopidogrel (374 in combination with aspirin, 67 as sole therapy), 83 (8%) were on no documented antiplatelet medication, and 33 (3%) were taking warfarin (with therapeutic international normalized ratio). The likelihood of clopidogrel use at the time of operation was higher for patients with a history of symptomatic carotid disease (P = .002). Over the study period, clopidogrel use increased from 31.9% in 2010 to 56.8% in 2017, which corresponds to an 11% (95% confidence interval, 6%-15%) increase annually. Postoperative strokes occurred in 15 patients (overall incidence, 1.4%), the majority of which were minor (12/15; 80%). Six strokes occurred in patients taking aspirin alone (6/509; 1.2%), two in patients on clopidogrel and aspirin (2/441; 0.5%), two in patients taking clopidogrel alone (2/67; 2.9%), three in patients on no documented antiplatelet medication (3/83; 3.6%), and two in those taking warfarin (one of which was secondary to a fatal intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of discharge [2/33; 6.1%]). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.03% (3/1066); the risk for the combined endpoint of any stroke, death, or myocardial infarction (MI) was 2.3% (25/1066), and the risk for major stroke, death, or MI was 1.2%. There was no apparent association between clopidogrel use and the incidence of postoperative bleeding (P = .59) or any other postoperative complication (stroke, death, MI, cranial nerve injury; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel use in our CEA practice has increased over time and has not been associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including bleeding. These data suggest that clopidogrel should not be discontinued prior to CEA and should be considered as part of 'optimal medical therapy' in patients undergoing CEA.

Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of ticlopidine derivatives and analogs as inhibitors of ectonucleotidase CD39.

Ticlopidine is an antithrombotic prodrug of the thienotetrahydropyridine family. For platelet inhibition it has to undergo oxidative ring-opening by cytochrome P450 enzymes. The resulting thiol reacts with a cysteine residue of the purinergic P2Y12 receptor on thrombocytes resulting in covalent receptor blockade. Ticlopidine in its intact, not-metabolized form was previously shown to inhibit ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (NTPDase1, also known as cluster of differentiation (CD) 39). CD39 catalyzes the extracellular hydrolysis of ATP via ADP to AMP, which is further hydrolyzed by ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) to adenosine. CD39 inhibition has been proposed as a novel strategy to increase the extracellular concentration of antiproliferative ATP, while decreasing immunosuppressive and cancer-promoting adenosine levels. In the present study, we performed an extensive structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis of ticlopidine derivatives and analogs as CD39 inhibitors followed by an in-depth characterization of selected compounds. Altogether 74 compounds were synthesized, 41 of which are new, not previously described in literature. Benzotetrahydropyridines, in which the metabolically labile thiophene is replaced by a benzene ring, were discovered as a new class of allosteric CD39 inhibitors.

The impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and fibrinogen levels on ischemic events in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: After treatment, high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is considered as an essential risk factor for recurrent ischemic events. AIM: To evaluate the impact of fibrinogen on HRPR after implantation of emergency drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to explore the predictive values of HRPR and fibrinogen for adverse ischemic events at 12 months. METHOD: This single-center prospective observational study analyzed patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation DES implantation from January 2017 to December 2018. Platelet reactivity was measured by thromboelastography (TEG) at 60-72 h after primary PCI. HRPR was defined as the adenosine diphosphate-induced maximum amplitude (MAADP) > 47 mm. RESULTS: A total of 919 patients were analyzed, of which 512 (55.8%) received aspirin and clopidogrel and 406 (44.2%) received aspirin and ticagrelor. Elevated fibrinogen levels were associated with an increased prevalence of HRPR (P < 0.001). High fibrinogen (quartile IV, ≥ 410 mg/dL) was an independent risk factor for HRPR after multivariate regression (odds ratio 6.556, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.200-13.431, P < 0.001). When analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the combination of high fibrinogen and HRPR was strongly predictive for ischemic major adverse cardiac events at 12 months compared to the group without HRPR and with low fibrinogen (hazard ratio 9.681, 95% CI: 4.467-20.98, log-rank P < 0.001). Similar results were confirmed in subgroups according to different dual antiplatelet therapies. CONCLUSION: A combination of high fibrinogen and HRPR may identify recurrent adverse ischemic events over 12 months. Ticagrelor exhibited more potent platelet inhibition and a better prognosis than clopidogrel.