Roles of TET and TDG in DNA demethylation in proliferating and non-proliferating immune cells.

BACKGROUND: TET enzymes mediate DNA demethylation by oxidizing 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in DNA to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). Since these oxidized methylcytosines (oxi-mCs) are not recognized by the maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1, DNA demethylation can occur through "passive," replication-dependent dilution when cells divide. A distinct, replication-independent ("active") mechanism of DNA demethylation involves excision of 5fC and 5caC by the DNA repair enzyme thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), followed by base excision repair. RESULTS: Here by analyzing inducible gene-disrupted mice, we show that DNA demethylation during primary T cell differentiation occurs mainly through passive replication-dependent dilution of all three oxi-mCs, with only a negligible contribution from TDG. In addition, by pyridine borane sequencing (PB-seq), a simple recently developed method that directly maps 5fC/5caC at single-base resolution, we detect the accumulation of 5fC/5caC in TDG-deleted T cells. We also quantify the occurrence of concordant demethylation within and near enhancer regions in the Il4 locus. In an independent system that does not involve cell division, macrophages treated with liposaccharide accumulate 5hmC at enhancers and show altered gene expression without DNA demethylation; loss of TET enzymes disrupts gene expression, but loss of TDG has no effect. We also observe that mice with long-term (1 year) deletion of Tdg are healthy and show normal survival and hematopoiesis. CONCLUSIONS: We have quantified the relative contributions of TET and TDG to cell differentiation and DNA demethylation at representative loci in proliferating T cells. We find that TET enzymes regulate T cell differentiation and DNA demethylation primarily through passive dilution of oxi-mCs. In contrast, while we observe a low level of active, replication-independent DNA demethylation mediated by TDG, this process does not appear to be essential for immune cell activation or differentiation.

TET2-mediated 5-hydroxymethylcytosine induces genetic instability and mutagenesis.

The family of Ten-Eleven Translocation (TET) proteins is implicated in the process of active DNA demethylation and thus in epigenetic regulation. TET 1, 2 and 3 proteins are oxygenases that can hydroxylate 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) and further oxidize 5-hmC into 5-formylcytosine (5-fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5-caC). The base excision repair (BER) pathway removes the resulting 5-fC and 5-caC bases paired with a guanine and replaces them with regular cytosine. The question arises whether active modification of 5-mC residues and their subsequent elimination could affect the genomic DNA stability. Here, we generated two inducible cell lines (Ba/F3-EPOR, and UT7) overexpressing wild-type or catalytically inactive human TET2 proteins. Wild-type TET2 induction resulted in an increased level of 5-hmC and a cell cycle defect in S phase associated with higher level of phosphorylated P53, chromosomal and centrosomal abnormalities. Furthermore, in a thymine-DNA glycosylase (Tdg) deficient context, the TET2-mediated increase of 5-hmC induces mutagenesis characterized by GC>AT transitions in CpG context suggesting a mutagenic potential of 5-hmC metabolites. Altogether, these data suggest that TET2 activity and the levels of 5-hmC and its derivatives should be tightly controlled to avoid genetic and chromosomal instabilities. Moreover, TET2-mediated active demethylation might be a very dangerous process if used to entirely demethylate the genome and might rather be used only at specific loci.

Minimal role of base excision repair in TET-induced global DNA demethylation in HEK293T cells.

Oxidation of 5-methylcytosine by TET family proteins can induce DNA replication-dependent (passive) DNA demethylation and base excision repair (BER)-based (active) DNA demethylation. The balance of active vs. passive TET-induced demethylation remains incompletely determined. In the context of large scale DNA demethylation, active demethylation may require massive induction of the DNA repair machinery and thus compromise genome stability. To study this issue, we constructed a tetracycline-controlled TET-induced global DNA demethylation system in HEK293T cells. Upon TET overexpression, we observed induction of DNA damage and activation of a DNA damage response; however, BER genes are not upregulated to promote DNA repair. Depletion of TDG (thymine DNA glycosylase) or APEX1 (apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1), two key BER enzymes, enhances rather than impairs global DNA demethylation, which can be explained by stimulated proliferation. By contrast, growth arrest dramatically blocks TET-induced global DNA demethylation. Thus, in the context of TET-induction in HEK293T cells, the DNA replication-dependent passive mechanism functions as the predominant pathway for global DNA demethylation. In the same context, BER-based active demethylation is markedly restricted by limited BER upregulation, thus potentially preventing a disastrous DNA damage response to extensive active DNA demethylation.