Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy of a combination regime containing two cervical sensitizers (mifepristone + Foley's catheter) versus single agent mifepristone or Foley's catheter for labor induction in women attempting TOLAC at late third trimester with a dead fetus in utero.

Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy of a combination regime containing two cervical sensitizers (mifepristone + Foley's catheter) versus single agent mifepristone or Foley's catheter for labor induction in women attempting TOLAC at late third trimester with a dead fetus in utero. AIM: To compare efficacy and safety of a new combination regime comprising of two cervical sensitizers used simultaneously with single agents, for labor induction in women attempting TOLAC at ≥34 weeks' gestation with a dead fetus. METHOD: This was a multiarm randomized controlled trial (RCT) where participants received one of the three regimes-single agent oral Mifepristone 200 mg, intracervical Foley's catheter (16 Fr size, filled with 40 mL normal saline after intracervical instillation), and combination regime consisting of both used simultaneously. Number of women undergoing vaginal birth within 48 h of induction (VB48 ) was the primary outcome compared between groups. RESULTS: VB48 was higher in participants on combination regime in comparison to participants on Foley's catheter (54 vs. 42). Total vaginal births were higher in participants on combination regime compared to both single agents (58 vs. 48 and 44). Duration and dose of oxytocin augmentation was lower in participants on combination regime compared to both single agents. Induction birth interval was short in participants on combination regime compared to those on Foley's catheter. Maternal complications between groups were similar. CONCLUSION: Combination of cervical sensitizers for labor induction in late third trimester among women with dead fetus attempting TOLAC resulted in higher proportion of vaginal births and might reduce risk of scar dehiscence due to requirement of a lower dose of oxytocin for augmentation.

Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour Induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: It remains uncertain whether the most appropriate management for women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening is repeating the ripening procedure or proceeding directly to induction by oxytocin. No adequately powered trial has compared these strategies. We hypothesise that induction of labour with oxytocin among women who have just undergone an ineffective first ripening procedure is not associated with a higher risk of caesarean delivery than a repeated cervical ripening with prostaglandins. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial aimed at comparing labour induction by oxytocin with a second cervical ripening that uses prostaglandins (slow-release vaginal dinoprostone; oral misoprostol 25 µg; dinoprostone vaginal gel 2 mg). Women (n=1494) randomised in a 1:1 ratio in 10 French maternity units must be ≥18 years with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation, at a term from ≥37+0 weeks of gestation, and have just completed a 24-hour cervical ripening procedure by any method (pharmacological or mechanical) with a Bishop score ≤6. Exclusion criteria comprise being in labour, having more than 3 contractions per 10 min, or a prior caesarean delivery or a history of uterine surgery, or a fetus with antenatally suspected severe congenital abnormalities or a non-reassuring fetal heart rate. The primary endpoint will be the caesarean delivery rate, regardless of indication. Secondary outcomes concern delivery, perinatal morbidity, maternal satisfaction and health economic evaluations. The nature of the assessed procedures prevents masking the study investigators and patients to group assignment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants will provide written informed consent. The ethics committee 'Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VII' approved this study on 2 April 2021 (No 2021-000989-15). Study findings will be submitted for publication and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04949633.

Childhood outcomes after induction of labor or expectant management for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a 10-year follow-up of the PPROMEXIL trials.

BACKGROUND: Management of late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks' gestation balances the risks of preterm birth with the risks of infection for both the mother and the neonate. Expectant management to prolong pregnancy showed similar risks of neonatal sepsis, but children at 2 years of age showed more neurodevelopmental delay when compared with induction of labor. Long-term outcomes on child development after 2 years of age are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of children born after singleton pregnancies complicated by late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes managed by induction of labor in comparison with expectant management. STUDY DESIGN: This was a follow-up study of the Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Expectant Management Versus Induction of Labor (PPROMEXIL) trials (randomized controlled trials between 2007 to 2011) evaluating children at 10 to 12 years of age (Netherlands Trial Register 6953). The primary outcomes were cognition, motor function, and behavior as assessed by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-V-NL, Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2, and Child Behavior Checklist, respectively. The secondary outcomes were sensory processing, respiratory problems, educational attainment, and general health. Mild delay was defined as -1 standard deviation or corresponding percentile. The relative risk and confidence intervals were calculated using standard methods. RESULTS: This follow-up study invited 711 surviving children of the 714 singleton pregnancies randomized in the original trials. In total, 248 (35%) children participated (127 induction of labor, 121 expectant management). Children born after induction of labor had no significant differences in the primary outcomes when compared with those born after expectant management. Mild cognitive delay was observed in 7 of 122 (5.7%) children born after induction of labor in comparison with in 12 of 120 (10.0%) children born after expectant management (relative risk, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.41). A mild delay in motor function was observed in 42 of 122 (34.4%) children born after induction of labor vs in 55 of 120 (45.8%) children born after expectant management (relative risk, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.03). Mild abnormal behavior was observed in 37 of 125 (29.6%) children born after induction of labor compared with in 33 of 118 (28.0%) children born after expectant management (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.57). Secondary outcomes were also comparable between the induction of labor and the expectant management groups except that more children born after expectant management had a hospital admission (relative risk, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.89) or a surgery (relative risk, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.82). CONCLUSION: In children born after pregnancies with late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, expectant management did not improve long-term outcomes at 10 to 12 years when compared with induction of labor.

Implementation of glucose 5% supplementation protocol to reduce the duration of labor among women with cervical ripening by prostaglandins: The GLUCOSHORT before-and-after study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous publications have shown that glucose supplementation could reduce labor duration in women with induction of labor with a favorable cervix but none have shown it for women with an unfavorable cervix.  The purpose of our study was to assess the impact on labor duration of a protocol of glucose supplementation used for induction of labor in women with an unfavorable cervix. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The protocol implemented in November 2017 added glucose supplementation by 5% dextrose at 125 mL/h to Ringer lactate for women with an unfavorable cervix with labor induced with dinoprostone gel. The study included women who underwent this protocol with a singleton, term, cephalic fetus from June 2017 through April 2018. The primary outcome was the labor duration. The secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage rate, neonatal outcomes, and durations other stage of labor. These outcomes were compared between the pre-intervention (from June 1 to October 31, 2017) and post-intervention (from December 1, 2017 to April 30, 2018) periods. RESULTS: The pre-intervention period included 116 women, and the post-intervention period 123. The characteristics of women and the induction of labor were similar in the two periods. The median duration from induction to delivery was not significantly different between the two periods (13.2 h, IQR 9.1-18.6 versus 13.6 h IQR 9.3-18.3, P=.67). The secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Glucose supplementation administered to women with an unfavorable cervix undergoing induction does not appear to reduce the induction-delivery duration.

The feto-placental metabolome of spontaneous labour is not reproduced following induction of labour.

INTRODUCTION: The mechanism for human labour remains poorly understood, limiting our ability to manage complications including spontaneous preterm birth and induction of labour (IOL). The study of fetal signals poses specific challenges. Metabolomic analysis of maternal blood, the cord artery (CA), and cord vein (CV), allows simultaneous interrogation of multiple metabolic pathways associated with different modes of labour onset and birth. METHODS: Global mass spectrometry metabolomics analysis was performed on serial samples collected from participants during pregnancy, in latent phase of labour, and following birth (CA, CV, and intervillous (IV) blood), from those who spontaneously laboured and birthed vaginally (SL group), had IOL and birthed vaginally (IOL group), or birthed via elective caesarean section (no labour; ECS group). RESULTS: There were clear differences in fetal and maternal steroid, arachidonate and sphingosine pathways between the SL and IOL groups, despite similar uterine contractions and vaginal birth. The CA/CV ratio for key steroids of the IOL group were more alike the ECS group than the SL group, including progesterone (CA/CV ratio for: SL group=3.5; IOL group=0.5; and ECS group=0.5), and oestriol (CA/CV ratio for: SL group=4.3; IOL group=0.4; and for ECS group=0.2). There were no such changes in the maternal samples. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that IOL does not reproduce the pathways activated in spontaneous labour. The decreased placental progesterone production observed with spontaneous labour may represent a local intrauterine progesterone withdrawal, which, together with other signals, would activate parturition pathways involving arachidonate and sphingosine metabolism.

Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon (CCRB) for induction of labor (IOL) at term in primipara. METHODS: A total of 227 singleton full-term pregnancies with indications of IOL were enrolled and randomly divided into the control and study groups in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. In the control group, a conventional method was used. Both the uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 80 mL and removed after 12 h. In the study group, a modified method was used. The uterine and vaginal balloons were filled to 120 mL and 40 mL respectively. Light traction was given to help CCRB to be discharged after 12 h placement. Oxytocin was administered in both groups after CCRB was discharged before labor starting. The improved Bishop scores, duration of labor, and spontaneous delivery rate were evaluated in the two groups. RESULTS: The improved Bishop scores in the study group were 3.06 ± 0.97 at 12 h placement of CCRB and 4.37 ± 0.87 when CCRB was discharged, which were significantly higher compared to the control group (2.52 ± 0.79, p < 0.05). Duration of the first stage of labor and the full labor in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group ((6.17 ± 2.85) h vs. (7.27 ± 2.90) h, p = 0.010; (7.07 ± 3.18) h vs. (8.09 ± 3.11) h, p = 0.028). No difference in spontaneous delivery rate between the two groups was observed. But the delivery rate within 24 h between the two groups was significantly different (79.79% vs. 55.91%, p < 0.05). For the cases with initial Bishop scores ≤ 3, the improved score was significantly increased, the first stage of labor and the full labor were significantly shorter in the study group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Those results were not observed in cases with initial Bishop scores of 4-6. CONCLUSIONS: The modified application of CCRB could benefit cervical ripening, shorten the duration of labor, especially for cases with poor cervical maturity, and improve the delivery rate within 24 h. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered: ChiCTR2200058270. Registered 04/04/2022.

Simultaneous use of high-volume Foley catheter (60 ml) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the simultaneous effect of high-volume Foley catheter (HVFC) (60 ml) and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction in nulliparous women. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted among nulliparous post-date (>40 weeks) pregnant women between June and December 2019. At enrollment 100 women were randomized into each group (either HVFC and vaginal misoprostol or low-volume Foley catheter [LVFC] [30 ml] and vaginal misoprostol), for labor induction. Demographic and clinical data were collected at enrollment and delivery. RESULTS: Women in the HVFC group had statistically significantly shorter induction to delivery interval (median 860 min, interquartile range [IQR] 840-940 min vs. 1160 min, IQR 1080-1320 min, P < 0.001) and duration of labor (median 615 min, IQR 600-680 min vs. 750, IQR 692.5-800 min, P < 0.001). Mode of vaginal delivery (n = 94 vs. n = 78, P = 0.002), number of doses of misoprostol required (median 2, IQR 1-2 vs. 2, IQR 1-3), and need of oxytocin augmentation (n = 22 vs. n = 39, P = 0.014 and P < 0.001), was significantly better in the HVFC group. However, there was no significant difference with respect to other maternal or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous use of HVFC and vaginal misoprostol for labor induction significantly shortens the induction to delivery interval and duration of labor in nulliparous women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India CTRI/2019/05/019394 (http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=31554&EncHid=&userName=Foley%20catheter).

Clinical analysis of second-trimester pregnancy termination after previous caesarean delivery in 51 patients with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUNDS: Pregnancy termination during the second trimester in patients with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a complex and challenging clinical problem. Based on our literature review, there has been a relative increase in the number of such cases being treated by hysterotomy and/or local uterine lesion resection and repair. In the present study, a retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes when different management strategies were used to terminate pregnancy in the patients with placenta previa and PAS. METHODS: A total of 51 patients who underwent pregnancy termination in the second trimester in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital between June 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All patients having previous caesarean delivery (CD) were diagnosed with placenta previa status and PAS. RESULTS: ① Among the 51 patients, 16 cases received mifepristone and misoprostol medical termination, 15 cases received mifepristone and Rivanol medical termination, but 1 of them was transferred to hysterotomy due to failed labor induction, another 20 cases were performed planned hysterotomy. There was no placenta percreta cases and uterine artery embolization (UAE) was all performed before surgery.② There were 31 cases who underwent medical termination and 30 cases were vaginal delivery. Dilation and evacuation (D&E) were used in 20 cases of medical abortion failure and in all 30 cases of difficult manual removal of placental tissue. ③ A statistically significant difference was found among the three different strategies in terms of gestational weeks, the type of placenta previa status, main operative success rate and ß-HCG regression time (P < 0.05). ④ There were 4(7.8%) cases who were taken up for hysterectomy because of life-threatening bleeding or severe bacteremia during or after delivery and hysterotomy. The uterus was preserved with the implanted placenta partly or completely left in situ in 47(92.2%) cases. Combined medical and/or surgical management were used for the residual placenta and the time of menstrual recovery was 52(range: 33 to 86) days after pregnancy termination. CONCLUSIONS: Terminating a pregnancy by vaginal delivery through medical induction of labor may be feasible if clinicians have an overall understanding of gestational age, the type of placenta previa status, the type of placenta accreta, and patients concerns about preserving fertility. A collaborative team effort in tertiary medical centers with a very experience MDT and combined application of multiple methods is required to optimize patient outcomes.

Relations between second-trimester aneuploidy screening results and prediction of labour induction success in term pregnancies.

We aimed to assess whether the second-trimester maternal serum markers could be used for the prediction of labour induction success. This prospective study enrolled women planned labour induction at term. Women were assigned to one of two groups: vaginal prostaglandin or balloon dilatation. All patients were evaluated for Bishop score, maternal serum oestriol, human chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone at the time of second-aneuploidy screening. The total successful rate for induction of labour was 63.9% in both groups. Maternal serum oestriol multiple of median (MoM) values were significantly lower among the caesarean section group compared to the vaginal delivery group (p < .001). A MoM value of 0.74 for oestriol was associated with a sensitivity of 75.9%, specificity of 41.0%, a positive predictive value of 76.6% and a negative predictive value of 58.0% for a successful induction of labour. Oestriol had a good performance in the prediction of successful induction of labour at term.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Induction of labour is a common procedure undertaken whenever the benefits of prompt delivery outweigh the risks of expectant management. Previous studies have reported that a decreased progesterone/oestradiol ratio and increased maternal plasma oestriol levels are associated with successful labour. What the results of this study add? The results of this study showed that second-trimester oestriol multiple of median (MoM) value provide a significant contribution to the efforts of the prediction of successful induction of labour in term pregnancy, having a sensitivity of 69.8%, specificity of 92.4%, positive predictive value of 83.3% and negative predictive value of 82.5%.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This finding can be used as an additional method for prediction of labour induction as well as multiparity and Bishop score. This adds new valuable data to the literature which could be used for systematic reviews and for implementing guidelines and protocols on labour induction.

Caracterización de mujeres en trabajo de parto a las que se les aplicó Maniobra Kristeller / Characterization of women in labor to whom the Kristeller Maneuver was applied

Introducción: en la obstetricia se realizan algunas prácticas que producen daños significativos a la madre o a su bebé, aunque no siempre se admite su ejecución. Un ejemplo es la maniobra de Kristeller, cuya aplicación es controvertida. Objetivo: determinar la frecuencia con que se realizó la maniobra de Kristeller en una muestra de mujeres atendidas en la maternidad del Hospital San Felipe de Tegucigalpa. Metodología: estudio descriptivo, que se realizó en el período comprendido entre los meses de marzo a mayo del 2018. Se incluyeron un total de 376 pacientes. Las variables estudiadas fueron: hora del parto, paridad, profesional que atendió y supervisó el parto, profesional que realizó la maniobra de Kristeller, complicaciones maternas y neonatales observadas. Resultados: se encontró una frecuencia de maniobra de Kristeller de 12.2 % (46/376). Conclusiones: ser primigesta incrementó el riesgo de que se le aplicara la maniobra Kristeller (OR: 3.11, IC:95%, p=0.0002), dentro de los factores protectores se encontraron ser multípara (OR:0.25, IC:95%, p=0.00004) y, haber sido atendida por una licenciada en enfermería (OR: 0.34, IC:95%, p=0.0097). La maniobra de Kristeller aumentó el riesgo de complicaciones maternas en 12.5 veces (OR: 17.6, IC:95%, p=0.0000000019) y 6.5 veces en el neonato (OR: 7.7 IC:95%, p=0.0000578)...(AU)

Inducción de trabajo de parto en pacientes COVID-19: experiencia en el Hospital San Juan de Dios / Labor induction in COVID-19 patients: experience in the San Juan de Dios Hospital

INTRODUCCIÖN Y OBJETIVOS: Describir la experiencia de los partos en gestantes con diagnóstico confirmado de COVID 19 mediante RT-PCR asintomáticas o con sintomatología leve y aquellas sin la enfermedad, y determinar la tasa de éxito de parto vaginal en inducción de trabajo de parto. MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes que tuvieron su parto entre 15 de Abril y 03 de Julio del 2020 en el Hospital San Juan de Dios. Se incluyeron las pacientes inducidas con Dinoprostona, Oxitocina o ambas de manera secuencial y se dividieron según estatus COVID 19 mediante RT-PCR al ingreso. Se caracterizó demográficamente el grupo de pacientes positivas y se determinaron los datos de ambos grupos en relación a la necesidad de inducción de trabajo de parto y su éxito para parto vaginal. RESULTADOS: De un total de 657 nacimientos, hubo un 9.7% (n=64) de pacientes con COVID 19, de las cuales un 23.4% (n=15) requirió inducción de trabajo de parto, con una tasa de éxito para parto vaginal de un 66.7% (n=10). De estas pacientes, un 50% recibió Oxitocina, un 40% Dinosprostona y un 10% ambos medicamentos de forma secuencial. En las pacientes negativas, hubo un total de 568 nacimientos, con un 29.8% (n=169) de usuarias que requirieron inducción. La tasa de éxito para parto vaginal en este grupo fue de 72.2% (n=122), utilizando un 50% Oxitocina; un 27% Dinoprostona; un 14.8% ambas; y un 8.2% Balón de Cook. CONCLUSIONES: Sabemos que los resultados de este estudio están limitados por el bajo número de pacientes incluidas, sin embargo, podemos observar que, en nuestra experiencia con las pacientes que arrojaron PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivas, asintomáticas o con enfermedad leve, se logró realizar la inducción de trabajo de parto según protocolos habituales, obteniendo porcentajes de éxito para partos vaginales, similares a las pacientes sin la enfermedad.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Describe the experience of deliveries in pregnant women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID 19 by asymptomatic RT-PCR or with mild symptoms and those without the disease, and determine the success rate of vaginal delivery in the induction of labor. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who had their delivery between 15th April and 03rd of July, 2020 in the San Juan de Dios Hospital. Patients induced with Dinoprostone, Oxytocin or both sequentially were included, and were divided according to COVID 19 status by RT-PCR on their admission process. The group of positive patients was demographically characterized and the data of both groups was determined in relation to the need for labor induction and its success for vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Of a total of 657 births, there were 9.7% (n = 64) of patients with COVID 19, of which 23.4% (n = 15) required labor induction, with a success rate for vaginal delivery of 66.7% (n = 10). Of these patients, 50% received Oxytocin, 40% Dinosprostone and 10% both drugs sequentially. In the negative patients, there were a total of 568 births, with 29.8% (n = 169) of users requiring labor induction. The success rate for vaginal delivery in this group was 72.2% (n = 122); 50% using Oxytocin; 27% Dinoprostone; 14.8% using both; and 8.2% using Cook's Catheter. CONCLUSIONS: We know that the results of this study are limited by the low number of patients included, however, in our experience, we can observe that, in patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive, asymptomatic or with mild disease, it was possible to perform induction of labor according to standard protocols, achieving success rates for vaginal deliveries, similar to patients without the disease.

Term prelabor rupture of membranes: Foley catheter versus dinoprostone as ripening agent.

INTRODUCTION: Term prelabor rupture of membranes (TPROM) occurs in approximately 8 % of pregnancies. This condition regularly requires medical intervention such as induction of labor. The actual data concerning cervical ripening in case of TPROM does not favor any of the available techniques. This is the first study comparing dinoprostone versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in TPROM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective before-after study. We enrolled all the patients with confirmed TPROM after 37 weeks of gestation (WG) who required cervical ripening. Women were included if they had a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation, with unfavorable cervix (Bishop ≤ 6). Patients were excluded if they had a previous uterine surgery, a multiple pregnancy, contraindication to vaginal delivery, spontaneous labor or favorable cervix (Bishop > 6). During the first period (2015), the protocol of cervical ripening involved dinoprostone (prostaglandins E2) by vaginal administration (vaginal gel or pessary). During the second period (2016-2017), the protocol of cervical ripening involved Foley catheter (FC). The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean section. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-eight patients were included for the analysis: 131 in the first period (dinoprostone group) and 107 in the second period (foley catheter group). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the mode of delivery (cesarean section: 206 % vs 13 %, p = 016). Concerning tolerance, the were no difference in the rates of postpartum hemorrhage, maternal per-partum fever and endometrisis. Neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups. The induction to delivery interval was lower with dinoprostone (20,3 h versus 26,0 h, p = 0001). The mean duration of labor was also significantly different (6,9 h for dinoprostone group versus 8,7 h for FC group, p = 001). CONCLUSION: Cervical ripening in case of TPROM after 37 W G with Foley catheter seems to be a safe technique with similar outcomes to prostaglandins regarding the mode of delivery.

Labor and delivery guidance for COVID-19.

This document addresses the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for providers and patients in labor and delivery (L&D). The goals are to provide guidance regarding methods to appropriately screen and test pregnant patients for COVID-19 prior to, and at admission to L&D reduce risk of maternal and neonatal COVID-19 disease through minimizing hospital contact and appropriate isolation; and provide specific guidance for management of L&D of the COVID-19-positive woman, as well as the critically ill COVID-19-positive woman. The first 5 sections deal with L&D issues in general, for all women, during the COVID-19 pandemic. These include Section 1: Appropriate screening, testing, and preparation of pregnant women for COVID-19 before visit and/or admission to L&D Section 2: Screening of patients coming to L&D triage; Section 3: General changes to routine L&D work flow; Section 4: Intrapartum care; Section 5: Postpartum care; Section 6 deals with special care for the COVID-19-positive or suspected pregnant woman in L&D and Section 7 deals with the COVID-19-positive/suspected woman who is critically ill. These are suggestions, which can be adapted to local needs and capabilities.

Effect of different doses of dexamethasone on labor in Santa Inês ewes and its influence on the onset of labor and the expulsion of fetal membranes / Efeito de diferentes doses de dexametasona para a indução do parto em ovelhas Santa Inês e sua influência sobre as características do parto

The induction of labor aims to concentrate births to follow up better the parturient and the first care to the neonates. However, even if the labor induction technique with dexamethasone administration has been successfully described since the late 1970s, few studies report the technique of birth development and neonatal vitality in Santa Inês sheep. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of dexamethasone use in two doses (8 and 16mg) in labor induction of Santa Inês ewes at 145 days of gestation and to evaluate its effects on the birth characteristics. In this study, 58 ewes were used, raised in an extensive system in the experimental farms of UFBA, with confirmation pregnancy after fixed-time artificial insemination or controlled breeding. These female ewes were separated into three groups according to the dose of dexamethasone administered (G1 = 0mg, G2 = 8mg, and G3 = 16mg). From these births, 79 lambs were born. This study analyzed the period from induction of labor to birth, fetal presentation at birth, the weight of the placenta, and the period for placenta expulsion. The data were analyzed by the Statistical Analysis System (SAS v.9.1.3®, 2002), and the significance level considered for all analyzes was 5%. Births of induced groups occurred on average at 48.4±22.17 hours after induction, while the females with non-induced labor gave birth 131.96±41.9 hours on average after the placebo application (P<0.05), confirming the efficiency of both doses for induction of labor. The period from induction to birth did not differ (P>0.05) between the doses used. There were no differences in delivery about the fetal static relation, time to placental attachment, and weight. With this study, it can be concluded that the induction at 145 days of gestation with eight or 16mg of dexamethasone is a useful technique and does not alter the labor in Santa Inês sheep.(AU)

A indução do parto visa concentrar os nascimentos para melhor acompanhamento das parturientes e primeiros cuidados aos neonatos. Contudo, mesmo que a técnica de indução de parto, com administração de dexametasona, tenha sido descrita com sucesso desde o final da década de 70, existem estudos escassos que relatam a influência desta técnica sobre o parto em ovinos da raça Santa Inês. Dessa forma, o objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a eficácia da dexametasona em duas doses (8 e 16mg), para a indução do parto de ovelhas Santa Inês com 145 dias de gestação e avaliar os seus efeitos nas características de desencadeamento e finalização do parto. Para este estudo foram utilizadas 58 ovelhas, criadas em sistema extensivo nas fazendas experimentais da UFBA, com prenhez confirmada após inseminação artificial em tempo fixo ou monta controlada. Essas fêmeas foram separadas em três grupos, de acordo com a dose de dexametasona administrada (G1 = 0mg, G2 = 8mg e G3 = 16mg). Destes partos nasceram 79 cordeiros. Foram avaliados o período em horas da indução do parto aos nascimentos, a apresentação fetal ao nascimento, assim como o peso da placenta e o período para o delivramento. Os dados foram analisados pelo pacote estatístico Statistical Analysis System (SAS v.9.0®, 2002) sendo considerado para todas as análises o nível de significância de 5%. Os nascimentos dos grupos induzidos ocorreram em média com 48,4±22,1 horas após a indução, enquanto que as fêmeas com parto não induzido pariram em média 131,96±41,9 horas após aplicação do placebo (P<0,05), confirmando a eficácia de ambas as doses para indução do parto. O período da indução até o parto não diferiu (P>0,05) entre as doses utilizadas. Não ocorreram diferenças no parto em relação à estática fetal, tempo para o delivramento e peso da placenta nos diferentes grupos. Com este estudo, conclui-se que a indução de parto em ovelhas aos 145 dias de gestação com oito e 16 mg de dexametasona é uma técnica eficaz e que não altera o trabalho de parto nas ovelhas da raça Santa Inês.(AU)

Intrauterine Foley catheter for 48 versus 24 hours for cervical ripening: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety of keeping an intrauterine Foley catheter for 48 hours versus 24 hours for cervical ripening. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the De Soysa Hospital for Women, Sri Lanka from April 1 to December 31, 2014 (trial registration: SLCTR/2014/006). Low-risk women with a Bishop score ≤5 at 40 weeks + 5 days of gestation were allocated to either 24-hour (n=107; Group A) or 48-hour (n=94; Group B) groups. Proportions developing spontaneous onset of labor (SOL), neonatal status, pre- and post-procedure C-reactive protein (CRP), cervical smears, and placental histology in those who experienced SOL were compared. RESULTS: In Group A, 35 (32.7%) experienced SOL, against 54 (57.4%) in Group B (P<0.001, odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.56-4.93). There was no difference in mean length of active labor (7.48 vs 7.69 hours), cesarean delivery (16% vs 14%), bacterial vaginosis rates in post-induction cervical smear (10.3% vs 6.7%), mean CRP increase (4.08 vs 3.91 IU), evidence of chorioamnionitis (5.7% vs 11.1%), mean 1 and 5-minute Apgars, number of neonates with pyrexia (8.4 vs 8.5%), and admission to the Special Care Baby Unit (15% vs 12.8%). CONCLUSION: Group B experienced a statistically significant increase in SOL, without increasing infectious and neonatal morbidity.

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness and safety of oral misoprostol (50 µg every four hours as needed), low dose vaginal misoprostol (25 to 50 µg every six hours as needed), and our established dinoprostone vaginal gel (one to two mg every six hours as needed) induction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consenting women with a live term single cephalic fetus for indicated labor induction were randomized (3N = 511). Prior uterine surgery or non-reassuring fetal surveillance were exclusions. Concealed computer generated randomization was stratified and blocked. Newborns were assessed by a team unaware of group assignment. The primary outcome was time from induction at randomization to vaginal birth for initial parametric analysis. Sample size was based on mean difference of 240 minutes with α2 = 0.05 and power 95%. Non-parametric analysis was also pre-specified ranking cesareans as longest vaginal births. RESULTS: Enrollment was from April 1999 to December 2000. Demographics were similar across groups. Analysis was by intent to treat, with no loss to follow up. Mean time (±SD) to vaginal birth was 1356 (±1033) minutes for oral misoprostol, 1530 (±3249) minutes for vaginal misoprostol, and 1208 (±613) minutes for vaginal dinoprostone (P = 0.46, ANOVA). Median times to vaginal birth were 1571, 1339, and 1451 minutes respectively (P = 0.46, Kruskal-Wallis). Vaginal births occurred within 24 hours in 44.9, 53.5 and 47.7% respectively (P = 0.27, χ2). There were no significant differences in Kaplan Meier survival analyses, cesareans, adverse effects, or maternal satisfaction. The newborn who met birth asphyxia criteria received vaginal misoprostol, as did. all three other newborns with cord artery pH<7.0 (P = 0.04, Fisher Exact). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in effectiveness of the three groups. Profound newborn acidemia, though infrequent, occurred only with low dose vaginal misoprostol.

Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended orally administrated dosage of misoprostol (25 µg) with a vaginal slow-release (7 µg/hour) insert of misoprostol regarding time from induction to delivery and safety of the method. DESIGN: Open label, Randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Delivery ward at a secondary referral hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, from 1 October 2016 to 21 February 2018. POPULATION: One hundred and ninety-six primiparous women with singletons in cephalic presentation at ≥37 weeks of gestation and with a Bishop score of ≤4. METHODS: Women were randomised to an oral solution of misoprostol (Cytotec® n = 99) or vaginal slow-release misoprostol (Misodel® [MVI] n = 97). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: time from induction to vaginal delivery. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mode of delivery; proportion of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours (VD24); neonates with an Apgar score of <7 at 5 minutes; pH < 7.10; postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) of >1000 ml; hyperstimulation; and women's delivery experience (VAS). RESULTS: There was no difference in the time to delivery [corrected] (median 21.1 hours in the MVI group and 23.2 hours in the oral group; Kaplan-Mayer log rank P = 0.31). There was no difference regarding the proportion of VD24 (50.5 versus 55.7%, P = 0.16). Hyperstimulation with non-reassuring cardiotocography (CTG) was more common in the MVI group (14.4 versus 3.0%, P < 0.01). Terbutaline (Bricanyl® ) was used more often for hyperstimulation in the MVI group (22.7 versus 4.0%, P < 0.01). There was no difference in the numbers of children admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal delivery after induction of labour (IOL) with slow-release misoprostol did not result in a shorter time from induction to vaginal delivery, compared with oral misoprostol solution, but was associated with a higher risk for hyperstimulation and fetal distress. There were no differences in mode of delivery or neonatal outcome. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: IOL with MVI was similar to oral solution of misoprostol but hyperstimulation and fetal distress were more common.

Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.

BACKGROUND: The optimal route of delivery in early-onset preeclampsia before 34 weeks is debated because many clinicians are reluctant to proceed with induction for perceived high risk of failure. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate labor induction success rates and compare maternal and neonatal outcomes by intended mode of delivery in women with early preterm preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 914 singleton pregnancies with preeclampsia in the Consortium on Safe Labor study for analysis who delivered between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks. We excluded fetal anomalies, antepartum stillbirth, or spontaneous preterm labor. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women undergoing induction of labor (n = 460) and planned cesarean delivery (n = 454) and women with successful induction of labor (n = 214) and unsuccessful induction of labor (n = 246). We calculated relative risks and 95% confidence intervals to determine outcomes by Poisson regression model with propensity score adjustment. The calculation of propensity scores considered covariates such as maternal age, gestational age, parity, body mass index, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, hospital type and site, birthweight, history of cesarean delivery, malpresentation/breech, simplified Bishop score, insurance, marital status, and steroid use. RESULTS: Among the 460 women with induction (50%), 47% of deliveries were vaginal. By gestational age, 24 to 27 6/7, 28 to 31 6/7, and 32 to 33 6/7, the induction of labor success rates were 38% (12 of 32), 39% (70 of 180), and 54% (132 of 248), respectively. Induction of labor compared with planned cesarean delivery was less likely to be associated with placental abruption (adjusted relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.67), wound infection or separation (adjusted relative risk, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.85), and neonatal asphyxia (0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.78). Women with vaginal delivery compared with those with failed induction of labor had decreased maternal morbidity (adjusted relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.82) and no difference in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: About half of women with preterm preeclampsia who attempted an induction had a successful vaginal delivery. The rate of successful vaginal delivery increases with gestational age. Successful induction has the benefit of preventing maternal and fetal comorbidities associated with previous cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies. While overall rates of a composite of serious maternal and neonatal morbidity/mortality did not differ between induction of labor and planned cesarean delivery groups, women with failed induction of labor had increased maternal morbidity highlighting the complex route of delivery counseling required in this high-risk population of women.