A safety and feasibility analysis on the use of cold-stored platelets in combat trauma.

BACKGROUND: Damage-control resuscitation has come full circle, with the use of whole blood and balanced components. Lack of platelet availability may limit effective damage-control resuscitation. Platelets are typically stored and transfused at room temperature and have a short shelf-life, while cold-stored platelets (CSPs) have the advantage of a longer shelf-life. The US military introduced CSPs into the battlefield surgical environment in 2016. This study is a safety analysis for the use of CSPs in battlefield trauma. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry and Armed Services Blood Program databases were queried to identify casualties who received room-temperature-stored platelets (RSPs) or both RSPs and CSPs between January 1, 2016, and February 29, 2020. Characteristics of recipients of RSPs and RSPs-CSPs were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were identified; 131 (47.8%) received RSPs and 143 (52.2%) received RSPs-CSPs. The casualties were mostly male (97.1%), similar in age (31.7 years), with a median Injury Severity Score of 22. There was no difference in survival for recipients of RSPs (88.5%) versus RSPs-CSPs (86.7%; p = 0.645). Adverse events were similar between the two cohorts. Blood products received were higher in the RSPs-CSPs cohort compared with the RSPs cohort. The RSPs-CSPs cohort had more massive transfusion (53.5% vs. 33.5%, p = 0.001). A logistic regression model demonstrated that use of RSPs-CSPs was not associated with mortality, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.96 (p > 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-2.25). CONCLUSION: In this safety analysis of RSPs-CSPs compared with RSPs in a combat setting, survival was similar between the two groups. Given the safety and logistical feasibility, the results support continued use of CSPs in military environments and further research into how to optimize resuscitation strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Platelet Storage-Problems, Improvements, and New Perspectives.

Platelet transfusions are routine procedures in clinical treatment aimed at preventing bleeding in critically ill patients, including those with cancer, undergoing surgery, or experiencing trauma. However, platelets are susceptible blood cells that require specific storage conditions. The availability of platelet concentrates is limited to five days due to various factors, including the risk of bacterial contamination and the occurrence of physical and functional changes known as platelet storage lesions. In this article, the problems related to platelet storage lesions are categorized into four groups depending on research areas: storage conditions, additive solutions, new testing methods for platelets (proteomic and metabolomic analysis), and extensive data modeling of platelet production (mathematical modeling, statistical analysis, and artificial intelligence). This article provides extensive information on the challenges, potential improvements, and novel perspectives regarding platelet storage.

Prophylactic versus restrictive platelet transfusion strategy in patients with haematological malignancies in the ICU setting, a propensity-score analysis.

PURPOSE: Prophylactic platelet transfusions (PT) aim to reduce bleeding. We assessed whether restrictive PT compared to prophylactic strategy could apply in ICU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including patients >18 yo with haematological malignancy admitted to the ICU with thrombocytopenia <20 G/L between 2018 and 2021. Patients were classified in 2 groups according transfusion strategy applied during the first 3 days: prophylactic or restrictive transfusion. RESULTS: 180 patients were included, 87 and 93 in the restrictive and prophylactic groups respectively. After propensity-score analysis, 2 groups of 54 matched patients were analyzed. Restrictive strategy led to a significant reduction in PT with incidence rate for 100-ICU-patients-days of 34.9 and 49.9, incidence rate ratio = 0.699 [0.5-0.9], p = 0.006, representing a 31% decrease. Decreased PT persisted until day 28 with platelet concentrates transfusions-free days at day 28 of 21 [13-25] and 16.5 [10.2-21] in the 2 groups (p = 0.04). Restrictive strategy did not result in higher grade ≥ 2 bleeding. Transfusion efficiency was low with similar number of days with platelet <10 or < 20 G/L regardless of strategy. Platelet transfusion strategy was not associated with 28-day mortality. Platelet nadir <5G/L was associated with day-28 mortality with HR = 1.882 [1.011-3.055], p = 0.046. CONCLUSION: A restrictive PT strategy appears feasible in the ICU.

Impact of Intraoperative Allogeneic Platelet Transfusion on Healthcare-Associated Infections in Cardiac Surgery: Insights From a Large Single-Center Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite significant improvement in patient blood management, cardiac surgery remains a high hemorrhagic risk procedure. Platelet transfusion is used commonly to treat thrombocytopenia-associated perioperative bleeding. Allogeneic platelet transfusion may induce transfusion-related immunomodulation. However, its association with postoperative healthcare-associated infections is still a matter of debate. The objective was to evaluate the impact of allogeneic platelet transfusion during cardiac surgery on postoperative healthcare-associated infection incidence. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery from 2012 to 2018. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative platelet transfusion was defined as exposure in a causal model. The primary outcome was the incidence of healthcare-associated infections comprised of bloodstream infection, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and surgical-site infection. Among 7,662 included patients, 528 patients (6.8%) were exposed to intraoperative platelet transfusion, and 329 patients (4.3%) developed 454 postoperative infections. Bloodstream infection affected 106 patients (1.4%), hospital-acquired pneumonia affected 174 patients (2.3%), and surgical-site infection affected 148 patients (1.9%). Intraoperative platelet transfusion was associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infection after adjustment by multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.40-5.8; p = 0.004; n = 7,662), propensity score matching (OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.57-12.0), p = 0.007; n = 766), and propensity score overlap weighting (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.51-6.1, p = 0.002; n = 7,762). Surgical-site infection and hospital-acquired pneumonia were not significantly associated with platelet transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that intraoperative allogeneic platelet transfusion is a risk factor for bloodstream infection after cardiac surgery. These results supported the development of patient blood management strategies aimed at minimizing perioperative platelet transfusion in cardiac surgery.

Characterization of a novel mouse platelet transfusion model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Platelet transfusions are increasing with medical advances. Based on FDA criteria, platelet units are assessed by in vitro measures; however, it is not known how platelet processing and storage duration affect function in vivo. Our study's aim was to develop a novel platelet transfusion model stored in mouse plasma that meets FDA criteria adapted to mice, and transfused fresh and stored platelets are detectable in clots in vivo. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Platelet units stored in mouse plasma were prepared using a modified platelet-rich plasma (PRP) collection protocol. Characteristics of fresh and stored units, including pH, cell count, in vitro measures of activity, including activation and aggregation, and post-transfusion recovery (PTR), were determined. Lastly, a tail transection assay was conducted using mice transfused with fresh or stored units, and transfused platelets were identified by confocal imaging. RESULTS: Platelet units had acceptable platelet and white cell counts and were negative for bacterial contamination. Fresh and 1-day stored units had acceptable pH; the platelets were activatable by thrombin and adenosine diphosphate, agreeable with thrombin, had acceptable PTR, and were present in vivo in clots of recipients after tail transection. In contrast, 2-day stored units had clinically unacceptable quality. CONCLUSION: We developed mouse platelets for transfusion analogous to human platelet units using a modified PRP collection protocol with maximum storage of 1 day for an 'old' unit. This provides a powerful tool to test how process modifications and storage conditions affect transfused platelet function in vivo.

Improving platelet function following prophylactic platelet transfusion in patients with hematological malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet transfusion is a standard treatment to prevent bleeding in patients with hematological malignancies. Although transfusions can improve platelet count, their impact on platelet function remains controversial. METHODS: We conducted flow cytometry to assess platelet function before and after transfusion and performed subgroup analyses to examine differences based on blood type, corrected count increment (CCI), and platelet microparticles. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients who received prophylactic platelet transfusion were enrolled. CD42b expression increased, whereas CD41 expression decreased after transfusion. Apheresis platelets exhibited the lowest expression of PAC-1 and P-selectin when exposed to agonist stimulations. PAC-1 expression increased under high adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation, while P-selectin expression increased under both high ADP and thrombin receptor-activating peptide stimulation. In the subgroup analysis, patients with a CCI >4500 and those with the same blood types exhibited a more significant increase in PAC-1 and P-selectin expression under agonist stimulation. When comparing apheresis platelets collected on different days, only the percentage of platelet-derived microparticles showed a significant increase. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic transfusion improved platelet function. Platelet function significantly improved in patients with a CCI >4500, those with the same blood types as that of apheresis platelets, or those with platelet-derived microparticle levels <4.7%. No significant improvement in platelet function was noted after the transfusion of different blood types with acceptable compatibility or the transfusion of incompatible blood types. Our results suggest that transfusing platelets with the same blood type remains the optimal choice.

Trend towards reduction of transfusion reactions using prestorage leukocyte-reduced and pooled whole blood-derived platelets and cost savings compared with poststorage whole blood-derived random platelets as evidenced by real-time hemovigilance.

BACKGROUND: Due to chemotherapy-induced neutropenia or hematologic malignancies, immunocompromised cancer patients may have higher incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions compared with the general population and frequently require platelet transfusions. This quality improvement project compared the safety of transfusion using prestorage leukocyte-reduced and pooled whole blood-derived platelets (Acrodose/WBD) with conventionally produced poststorage WBD platelets (RDP) using an active hemovigilance system. METHODS: Every patient receiving a blood product at the hospital was virtually monitored in real time by trained nurses from a remote hemovigilance unit. These nurses monitor a digital dashboard, which populates a watch list of patients from the time blood product administration is initiated until 12 hours posttransfusion. Over the course of 6 months, 371 patients receiving 792 RDP transfusions and 423 patients receiving 780 Acrodose/WBD platelets transfusions were monitored for transfusion reactions. RESULTS: We identified 26 transfusion reactions in RDP but only 12 transfusion reactions in the Acrodose/WBD platelet group. CONCLUSION: Acrodose platelet transfusion was associated with fewer transfusion reactions, which resulted in significant cost savings.

Platelet concentrates in macular hole surgery. A journey through the labyrinth of terminology, preparation, and application: a comprehensive review.

The surgical management of macular holes is undergoing continuous evolution, with recent focus on the utilization of platelet concentrates as a promising adjunctive intervention. Currently, they present a valid surgical approach for achieving anatomical and functional success with a non-inferiority comparably to the alternative surgical techniques. Nonetheless, the utilization of varied platelet concentrates terminologies, coupled with the lack of standardization in their preparation methodologies, engenders both lexical confusion and challenges in comparing scientific studies published up until now. In this review, we summarized the published evidence concerning the application of platelet concentrates in macular holes surgery, aiming to clarify the terminology and methodologies employed and to establish a common consensus facilitating further development and diffusion of this promising technique.

The platelet storage lesion, what are we working for?

BACKGROUND: Platelet concentrate (PC) transfusions are crucial in prevention and treatment of bleeding in infection, surgery, leukemia, and thrombocytopenia patients. Although the technology for platelet preparation and storage has evolved over the decades, there are still challenges in the demand for platelets in blood banks because the platelet shelf life is limited to 5 days due to bacterial contamination and platelet storage lesions (PSLs) at 20-24°C under constant horizontal agitation. In addition, the relations between some adverse effects of platelet transfusions and PSLs have also been considered. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of PSLs is conducive to obtaining high quality platelets and facilitating safe and effective platelet transfusions. OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes developments in mechanistic research of PSLs and their relationship with clinical practice, providing insights for future research. METHODS: Authors conducted a search on PubMed and Web of Science using the professional terms "PSL" and "platelet transfusion." The obtained literature was then roughly categorized based on their research content. Similar studies were grouped into the same sections, and further searches were conducted based on the keywords of each section. RESULTS: Different studies have explored PSLs from various perspectives, including changes in platelet morphology, surface molecules, biological response modifiers (BMRs), metabolism, and proteins and RNA, in an attempt to monitor PSLs and identify intervention targets that could alleviate PSLs. Moreover, novel platelet storage conditions, including platelet additive solutions (PAS) and reconsidered cold storage methods, are explored. There are two approaches to obtaining high-quality platelets. One approach simulates the in vivo environment to maintain platelet activity, while the other keeps platelets at a low activity level in vitro under low temperatures. CONCLUSION: Understanding PSLs helps us identify good intervention targets and assess the therapeutic effects of different PSLs stages for different patients.

Optimal dose of cryoprecipitate in massive transfusion following trauma.

BACKGROUND: While cryoprecipitate (Cryo) is commonly included in massive transfusion protocols for hemorrhagic shock, the optimal dose of Cryo transfusion remains unknown. We evaluated the optimal red blood cell (RBC) to RBC to Cryo ratio during resuscitation in massively transfused trauma patients. METHODS: Adult patients in the American College of Surgeon Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) receiving massive transfusion (≥4 U of RBCs, ≥1 U of fresh frozen plasma, and ≥1 U of platelets within 4 hours) were included. A unit of Cryo was defined as a pooled unit of 100 mL. The RBC:Cryo ratio was calculated for blood products transfused within 4 hours of presentation. The association between RBC:Cryo and 24-hour mortality was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression adjusting for the volume of RBC, plasma and platelet transfusions, global and regional injury severity, and other relevant variables. RESULTS: The study cohort included 12,916 patients. Among those who received Cryo (n = 5,511 [42.7%]), the median RBC and Cryo transfusion volume within 4 hours was 11 U (interquartile range, 7-19 U) and 2 U (interquartile range, 1-3 U), respectively. Compared with no Cryo administration, only RBC:Cryo ratios ≤8:1 were associated with a significant survival benefit, while lower doses of Cryo (RBC:Cryo >8:1) were not associated with decreased 24-hour mortality. Compared with the maximum dose of Cryo administration (RBC:Cryo, 1:1-2:1), there was no difference in 24-hour mortality up to RBC:Cryo of 7:1 to 8:1, whereas lower doses of Cryo (RBC:Cryo, >8:1) were associated with significantly increased 24-hour mortality. CONCLUSION: One pooled unit of Cryo (100 mL) per 7 to 8 U of RBCs could be the optimal dose of Cryo in trauma resuscitation that provides a significant survival benefit while avoiding unnecessary blood product transfusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level IV.

Cold platelet transfusion: The effects of a fluid warmer on platelet function.

BACKGROUND: Recently the US Food and Drug Administration has granted variances to select blood centers to supply cold-stored platelet components (CSP). In hemorrhage resuscitation warming of blood components with approved fluid warming devices is common. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Pathogen-reduced apheresis platelet units were collected and stored in one of two ways: (1) CSP-I, (2) CSP-D. CSP-I were collected and immediately stored at 1-6°C until used. CSP-D were collected and stored at 20-24°C for 5 days and transferred to storage at 1-6°C until use. Aggregometry using arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and collagen as agonists was performed on the unit samples before and after the units were infused through a Ranger blood-warming device. RESULTS: CSP-I, 23 units, had very high aggregation responses to all agonists (all ≥47.6 ± 20.7). There was a statistically significant reduction in ADP-induced aggregometry results from 55.1 ± 23.2 before compared to 33.5 ± 14.6 following infusion of the PLT through the blood warmer (p < .001). There were no differences in AA and collagen aggregometry results before and after the infusion of the platelets through the blood warmer. CSP-D had 5 of the 15 units with visible clotting in the bag. The 10 CSP-Ds studied had lower aggregation than all agonists before and after infusion through the blood-warming device (all ≤49.9 ± 35.9). CONCLUSION: We detected a statistically significant reduction in ADP-induced aggregometry in CSP-I run through a Ranger blood-warming device with no change with AA or collagen agonist aggregometry.

Prophylactic Platelet Transfusion: Is There Evidence of Benefit, Harm, or No Effect?

The optimal use of prophylactic platelet transfusion remains uncertain in a number of clinical scenarios. Platelet count thresholds have been established in patients with hematologic malignancies, yet thresholds backed by scientific data are limited or do not exist for many patient populations. Clinical scenarios involving transfusion thresholds for thrombocytopenic patients with critical illness, need for surgery or invasive procedures, or those involving specials populations like children and neonates, lack clear evidence for discerning favorable outcomes without undue risk related to platelet transfusion. In addition, while prophylactic platelet transfusions are administered with the goal of enhancing hemostasis, increasing evidence supports critical nonhemostatic roles for platelets related to innate and adaptive immunity, inflammation, and angiogenesis, which may impact patient responses and outcomes. Here we review several recent studies conducted in adult or pediatric patients that highlight the limitations in our current understanding of prophylactic platelet transfusion. Together, these studies underscore the need for additional research, especially in the form of robust randomized clinical trials and integrating additional parameters beyond the platelet count. Future research at the basic, translational, and clinical levels will best define the optimal role for prophylactic transfusion across the lifespan and its broader impact on health and disease.

TSR: A User-Friendly R Shiny Application for Assessment of Optimal Blood Product Selection in ABO-Incompatible Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) need frequent transfusions, until their red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets start to recover. The safe transfusion for patients who receive ABO-incompatible HSCT is essential to the transplant process. To date, there is no user-friendly tool to choose the right blood product for transfusion treatment, despite the number of guidelines and expert advice on the subject. METHODS: R/shiny is a powerful programming language for clinical data analysis and visualization. It can create interactive web applications that work in real-time. The web application named TSR was built using R programming, simplifying blood transfusion practice for ABO-incompatible HSCT with a one-click solution. RESULTS: The TSR is divided into four main tabs. The home tab provides an overview of the application, while RBC, plasma and platelet transfusion tabs offer tailored suggestions for blood product selection in each category. Unlike traditional methods that rely on treatment guidelines and specialist consensus, TSR leverages the power of the R/Shiny interface to extract critical content based on user-specified parameters, providing an innovative approach to improve transfusion support. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights that the TSR enables real-time analysis, and promotes transfusion practice by offering a unique and efficient one-key output for blood product selection to ABO-incompatible HSCT. TSR has the potential to become a widely-utilized tool for transfusion services, providing a reliable and user-friendly solution that enhances transfusion safety in clinical practice.

Digital polymerase chain reaction to monitor platelet transfusions in cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Corrected count increment (CCI) measurements monitor the effectiveness of platelet transfusions in haemato-oncology, but they usually fail in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We investigated whether polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of mitochondrial single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is able to monitor the survival of transfused platelets in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Leukocyte-free, platelet-rich plasma was prepared from patients' blood to measure platelet counts based on patient-/donor-specific SNPs by digital PCR after DNA extraction. Platelet counts in samples from patients with severe thrombocytopenia were analysed by both PCR and flow cytometry. Ten patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of heart lung machine and without overt bleeding received a single apheresis platelet concentrate because of either dual platelet inhibition during a non-elective intervention or a complex procedure. Blood samples were collected at nine defined intervals (0-120 h) post transfusion. RESULTS: The digital PCR of the seven SNPs reliably quantified levels ≥0.6 G/L platelets, in good agreement with flow cytometry and without interference by other SNPs or by platelet activation. A mean 24-h CCI of 11.8 (range: 5.6-19.8) and a mean 120-h area under the curve (AUC) of 1386 (915-1821) hxG/L were observed for the transfused platelets. The mean AUC of 14,103 (3415-27,305) hxG/L for the patients' endogenous platelets indicates that transfused platelets represented only 11% (5-25) of the total platelet counts during 120 h post transfusion. CONCLUSION: PCR of mitochondrial SNPs offers a tool to assess the survival of platelets from apheresis concentrates in cardiac surgery patients to facilitate the implementation of improved transfusion strategies.

Therapeutic efficacy of platelet transfusion treated with amotosalen/UVA pathogen inactivation technology (INTERCEPTTM Blood System) in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy with curative intent: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: The INTERCEPTTM Blood System (Intercept Blood System, Cerus Europe BV, Amersfoort, the Netherlands) has been used to reduce or inactivate pathogen load in platelet concentrates in France for three years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After comparing the transfusion efficiency between pathogen-reduced platelets (PR_PLT) and untreated platelet products (U_PLT), our single-center observational study assessed the effectiveness of PR_PLT for the prevention of bleeding and for therapeutic treatment of WHO grade 2 bleeding in 176 patients undergoing chemotherapy with curative intent for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The main endpoints were the 24-hour (h) corrected count increment (24h_CCI) after each transfusion, and time to next transfusion. RESULTS: Whereas the transfused doses tended to be higher in the PR_PLT group compared to U_PLT, there was a significant difference in intertransfusion interval (ITI) and 24h_CCI. In prophylactic transfusions, PR_PLT transfusions of >0.65×1011/10 kg, regardless of the age of the product (day 2 to day 5), resulted in a 24h_CCI similar to that of the untreated platelet product; this meant the patient could be transfused at least every 48h. In contrast, most PR_PLT transfusions of <0.55×1011/10 kg did not achieve a transfusion interval of 48h. In the context of WHO grade 2 bleeding, PR_PLT transfusions >0.65×1011/10 kg and storage of less than 4 days seems more effective in stopping bleeding. DISCUSSION: These results, which must be confirmed by prospective studies, indicate the need for vigilance regarding the quantity and quality of PR_PLT products used to treat patients at risk of bleeding crisis. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Design and logistical considerations for the randomized adaptive non-inferiority storage-duration-ranging CHIlled Platelet Study.

BACKGROUND: Platelet transfusion is a potentially life-saving therapy for actively bleeding patients, ranging from those undergoing planned surgical procedures to those suffering unexpected traumatic injuries. Platelets are currently stored at room temperature (20°C-24°C) with a maximum storage duration of 7 days after donation. The CHIlled Platelet Study trial will compare the efficacy and safety of standard room temperature-stored platelets with platelets that are cold-stored (1°C-6°C), that is, chilled, with a maximum of storage up to 21 days in adult and pediatric patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures. METHODS/RESULTS: CHIlled Platelet Study will use a Bayesian adaptive design to identify the range of cold storage durations for platelets that are non-inferior to standard room temperature-stored platelets. If cold-stored platelets are non-inferior at durations greater than 7 days, a gated superiority analysis will identify durations for which cold-stored platelets may be superior to standard platelets. We present example simulations of the CHIlled Platelet Study design and discuss unique challenges in trial implementation. The CHIlled Platelet Study trial has been funded and will be implemented in approximately 20 clinical centers. Early randomization to enable procurement of cold-stored platelets with different storage durations will be required, as well as a platelet tracking system to eliminate platelet wastage and maximize trial efficiency and economy. DISCUSSION: The CHIlled Platelet Study trial will determine whether cold-stored platelets are non-inferior to platelets stored at room temperature, and if so, will determine the maximum duration (up to 21 days) of storage that maintains non-inferiority. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04834414.

Routine platelet transfusion in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage taking antiplatelet medication: Is it warranted?

BACKGROUND: After a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH), patients often receive a platelet transfusion to reverse the effects of antiplatelet medication and to reduce neurologic complications. As platelet transfusions have their own risks, this study evaluated their effects on tICH progression, need for operations and mortality. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we identified patients admitted to a level 1 trauma centre with a tICH from 2011 to 2015 who were taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or clopidogrel, or both. We categorized patients into 2 groups: platelet transfusion recipients and nonrecipients. We collected data on demographic characteristics, changes in brain computed tomography findings, neurosurgical interventions, in-hospital death and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). We used multivariable logistic regression to compare outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: We identified 224 patients with tICH, 156 (69.6%) in the platelet transfusion group and 68 (30.4%) in the no transfusion group. There were no between-group differences in progression of bleeds or rates of neurosurgical interventions. In the transfusion recipients, there was a trend toward increased ICU LOS (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-3.40) and in-hospital death (adjusted OR 3.23, 95% CI 0.48-21.74). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in outcomes between patients who received platelet transfusions and those who did not; however, the results suggest a worse clinical course, as indicated by greater ICU LOS and mortality, in the transfusion recipients. Routine platelet transfusion may not be warranted in patients taking ASA or clopidogrel who experience a tICH, as it may increase ICU LOS and mortality risk.

Changes in the incidence of transfusion reactions in hematological patients over the past 30 years.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological diseases are polytransfused and often immunocompromised, therefore susceptible to transfusion reactions (TR). This study aims to document the incidence of TRs in adult hematological patients and assess the effect of changes in the production of blood components and transfusion practice on their occurrence. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective observational analysis of TRs reported from 1993 to 2019 was performed. For the analysis of the effect of changes on the incidence of TRs, the evaluated time was divided into two periods: the 1st period before the introduction of changes in production, when leukoreduced blood components were used only selectively, and the 2nd period, when semi-automated method of production and universal leukoreduction was introduced. RESULTS: The decrease in the incidence of TRs was observed for both red blood cell (RBC) and platelet concentrate (PC) transfusions in the 2nd period. Since platelet additive solution has been used, a further decrease in the incidence was reported. The decrease in incidence was also observed for delayed hemolytic/serological transfusion reactions and for transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections. Four cases of incorrect blood transfusions were uniquely related to the hematological patients, caused by antigen loss and transfusion ordering after ABO-incompatible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DISCUSSION: Our results provided evidence that the introduction of tools offered by modern transfusion medicine: universal leukodepletion, plasma replacement with additive solutions, sensitive laboratory techniques, prophylactic antigen matching policy, informatization, and automatization, decreased the incidence of TRs and improved transfusion safety.

Neonatal platelet transfusions: New evidence and the challenges of translating evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice.

Platelet transfusions are a common intervention for thrombocytopenia. Although the main reason for transfusing platelets is to improve hemostasis, platelets have many additional physiological roles, including interactions with immune pathways. Much of the evidence base for safe and effective transfusions has been informed by randomized trials in adult patients with hematological malignancies. Only three randomized trials have been conducted in sick neonates. These trials have indicated evidence of harm, including a significantly higher rate of death or major bleeding within 28 days after randomization for the largest trial, which enrolled 660 infants. The overall research indicates limited effectiveness of platelet transfusions to reduce bleeding risk. It is important that the results of trials are implemented into practice, but uptake of research findings into neonatal medicine remains inconsistent, as for many areas of health care. There is a need to establish which potential implementation strategies (cost-) efficiently enact change, such as audit and feedback, automated reminder systems for ordering transfusions, and use of opinion leaders. Research is exploring potential mechanisms underlying the lack of effectiveness of platelet transfusions and the increased bleeding and mortality observed in neonatal randomized trials. One potential mechanism concerns the roles of platelets to promote excessive angiogenic signals during a vulnerable period of brain development. A further hypothesis explores the effects of transfusing "adult" platelets into "neonatal" thrombocytopenic blood on primary hemostasis and immune responses.