What Is the Implant Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Total Humeral Replacement in Patients with Primary Bone Tumors?

BACKGROUND: Total humeral replacement is an option to reconstruct massive bone defects after resection of locally advanced bone tumors of the humerus. However, implant survivorship, potential risk factors for implant revision surgery, and functional results of total humeral replacement are poorly elucidated because of the rarity of the procedure. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What is the revision-free implant and overall limb survivorship after total humerus replacement? (2) What factors are associated with implant revision surgery? (3) What is the functional outcome of the procedure as determined by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score? METHODS: Between August 1999 and December 2018, 666 patients underwent megaprosthetic reconstruction after resection of a primary malignant or locally aggressive/rarely metastasizing tumor of the long bones at our department. In all, 23% (154) of these patients had a primary tumor located in the humerus. During the study, we performed total humeral replacement in all patients with a locally advanced sarcoma, in patients with pathological fractures, in patients with skip metastases, or in patients with previous intralesional contaminating surgery, who would have no sufficient bone stock for a stable implant fixation for a single joint megaprosthetic replacement of the proximal or distal humerus. We performed no biological reconstructions or reconstructions with allograft-prosthetic composites. As a result, 5% (33 of 666) of patients underwent total humerus replacement. Six percent (2 of 33) of patients were excluded because they received a custom-made, three-dimensionally (3-D) printed hemiprosthesis, leaving 5% (31) of the initial 666 patients for inclusion in our retrospective analysis. Of these, 6% (2 of 31) had surgery more than 5 years ago, but they had not been seen in the last 5 years. Median (interquartile range) age at the time of surgery was 15 years (14 to 25 years), and indications for total humeral replacement were primary malignant bone tumors (n = 30) and a recurring, rarely metastasizing bone tumor (n = 1). All megaprosthetic reconstructions were performed with a single modular system. The implanted prostheses were silver-coated beginning in 2006, and beginning in 2010, a reverse proximal humerus component was used when appropriate. We analyzed endoprosthetic complications descriptively and assessed the functional outcome of all surviving patients who did not undergo secondary amputation using the 1993 MSTS score and the ASES score. The median (IQR) follow-up in all survivors was 75 months (50 to 122 months), with a minimum follow-up period of 25 months. We evaluated the following factors for possible association with implant revision surgery: age, BMI, reconstruction length, duration of surgery, extraarticular resection, pathological fracture, previous intralesional surgery, (neo-)adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy, and metastatic disease. RESULTS: The revision-free implant survivorship at 1 year was 77% (95% confidence interval 58% to 89%) and 74% (95% CI 55% to 86%) at 5 years. The overall limb survivorship was 93% (95% CI 75% to 98%) after 1 and after 5 years. We found revision-free survivorship to be lower in patients with extraarticular shoulder resection compared with intraarticular resections (50% [95% CI 21% to 74%] versus 89% [95% CI 64% to 97%]) after 5 years (subhazard ratios for extraarticular resections 4.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 16.5]; p = 0.03). With the number of patients available for our analysis, we could not detect a difference in revision-free survivorship at 5 years between patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy (40% [95% CI 5% to 75%]) and patients who did not (81% [95% CI 60% to 92%]; p = 0.09). The median (IQR) MSTS score in 9 of 13 surviving patients after a median follow-up of 75 months (51 to 148 months) was 87% (67% to 92%), and the median ASES score was 83 (63 to 89) of 100 points, with higher scores representing better function. CONCLUSION: Total humeral replacement after resection of locally advanced bone tumors appears to be associated with a good functional outcome in patients who do not die of their tumors, which in our study was approximately one- third of those who were treated with a resection and total humerus prosthesis. However, the probability of early prosthetic revision surgery is high, especially in patients undergoing extraarticular resections, who should be counseled accordingly. Still, our results suggest that if the prosthesis survives the first year, further risk for revision appears to be low. Future studies should reexamine the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on implant survival in a larger cohort and evaluate whether the use of soft tissue coverage with plastic reconstructive surgery might decrease the risk of early revisions, especially in patients undergoing extraarticular resections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Acetabular Reconstruction With Femoral Head Autograft After Intraarticular Resection of Periacetabular Tumors is Durable at Short-term Followup.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection is technically difficult and characterized by a high complication rate. Although endoprosthetic replacement can result in immediate postoperative functional recovery, biologic reconstructions with autograft may provide an enhanced prognosis in patients with long-term survival; however, little has been published regarding this approach. We therefore wished to evaluate whether whole-bulk femoral head autograft that is not contaminated by tumor can be used to reconstruct segmental bone defects after intraarticular resection of periacetabular tumors. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a pilot study, we evaluated (1) local tumor control, (2) complications, and (3) postoperative function as measured by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, we treated 13 patients with periacetabular malignant or aggressive benign tumors with en bloc resection, bulk femoral head autograft, and cemented THA (with or without a titanium acetabular reconstruction cup), and all were included for analysis here. During that time, the general indications for this approach were (1) patients anticipated to have a good oncologic prognosis and adequate surgical margins to allow this approach, (2) patients whose pelvic bone defects did not exceed two types (Types I + II or Types II + III as defined by Enneking and Dunham), and (3) patients whose medical insurance would not cover what otherwise might have been a pelvic tumor prosthesis. During this period, another 91 patients were treated with pelvic prosthetic replacement, which was our preferred approach. Median followup in this study was 36 months (range, 24-99 months among surviving patients; one patient died 8 months after surgery); no patients were lost to followup. Bone defects were Types II + III in five patients, and Types I + II in eight. After intraarticular resection, ipsilateral femoral head autograft combined with THA was used to reconstruct the segmental bone defect of the acetabulum. In patients with Types I + II resections, the connection between the sacrum and the acetabulum was reestablished with a fibular autograft or a titanium cage filled with dried bone-allograft particles which was enhanced by using a pedicle screw and rod system. Functional evaluation was done in 11 patients who remained alive and maintained the femoral head autograft at final followup; one other patient received secondary resection involving removal of the femoral head autograft and internal fixation, and was excluded from functional evaluation. Endpoints were assessed by chart review. RESULTS: Two patients experienced local tumor recurrence. Finally, eight patients did not show signs of the disease, one patient died of disease for local and distant tumor relapse, and four patients survived, but still had the disease. Three of these four patients had distant metastases without local recurrence and one had local control after secondary resection but still experienced system relapse. We observed the following complications: hematoma (one patient; treated surgically with hematoma clearance), delayed wound healing (one patient; treated by débridement), deep vein thrombosis (one patient), and hip dislocation (one patient; treated with open reduction). The median 1993 Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 83% (25 of 30 points; range, 19-29 points), and all patients were community ambulators; one used a cane, three used a walker, and nine did not use any assistive devices. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series at short-term followup, we found that reconstruction of segmental bone defects after intraarticular resection of periacetabular tumors with femoral head autograft does not appear to impede local tumor control; complications were in the range of what might be expected in a series of large pelvic reconstructions, and postoperative function was generally good. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Is There Benefit to Free Over Pedicled Vascularized Grafts in Augmenting Tibial Intercalary Allograft Constructs?

BACKGROUND: Intercalary reconstruction of tibial sarcomas with vascularized fibula autografts and massive bone allografts is reliable with predictable long-term results. However, inadequate data exist comparing free and pedicled vascularized fibula autografts in combination with a massive bone allograft in patients undergoing intercalary tibia reconstructions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Among patients undergoing large-segment intercalary allografting, we sought to compare supplemental free vascularized fibular autografts with supplemental pedicled vascularized fibular autografts, in terms of (1) oncologic results, (2) complications associated with surgery, (3) Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores, and (4) surgical time. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2013, we treated 320 patients, younger than 40 years, with tibial sarcomas. Thirty-five patients (11%) underwent amputations. One hundred ninety-five patients (61%) were treated with intraarticular resection of the tibia, which constituted 104 tumor endoprostheses, 63 proximal tibia allograft prosthetic composites, 21 osteoarticular allografts, and seven arthrodeses with allografts. Ninety patients (28%) underwent joint-sparing intercalary reconstruction. Forty-one (13%) of these 90 patients were treated with allografts alone, two (1%) with vascularized fibula grafts, and 47 (15%) with intercalary allografts supplemented by autografts (free fibular autografts, 22 patients, 7%; pedicled fibular autografts, 25 patients, 8%). During the study period, we used free vascularized fibular autografts in association with massive bone allograft for a resection longer than 12 cm with a very small periarticular residual segment. The choice for using a pedicled fibula harvested in the ipsilateral leg initially was for patients having only diaphyseal resections and the indication was later extended to intraepiphyseal osteotomies with a small periarticular residual segment. The goals of this study are to present the long-term results in this group of patients and compare their results based on the type of vascularized fibula harvest. There were 33 male and 14 female patients with mean age of 14 ± 6 years. The median followup was 84 months (range, 7-231 months). No patients were lost to followup before 1 year. Four patients died and were not available for followup after 18 months. The mean tibia resection length was 15 ± 4 cm and mean length of the harvested vascularized fibula was 18 ± 4 cm. RESULTS: Overall 5- and 10-year oncologic survival rates in this study were 87% ± 5% and 83% ± 6% respectively. With the numbers available, we observed no difference in survivorship free from death from disease between the study groups (85% ± 8% [95% CI, 174-232 months] of the free vascularized group versus 82% ± 8% [95% CI, 148-206 months] of the pedicled fibula graft group; p = 0.741). At last followup, 40 patients had no evidence of disease and seven had died of disease. Local recurrence was observed in two patients in the supplemental free vascularized fibula group and three patients in the supplemental pedicled vascularized fibula group, whereas metastases was observed in eight patients. With the numbers available, we observed no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing surgical complications between those treated with free vascularized fibula grafts and those treated with pedicled grafts (eight of 22 [36%] versus nine of 25 [36%] respectively; p = 0.605). With the numbers available, we observed no difference in mean MSTS scores between patients treated with free vascularized fibula grafts and those treated with pedicled grafts (24 ± 9 versus 25 ± 8; mean difference, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.54-4.6; p = 0.858). Mean surgical time was longer in the free vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft group at 9.4 ± 1.7 hours compared with that of the pedicled vascularized fibula and massive bone allograft group at 5.7 ± 1.3 hours (mean difference, 3.73 hours; 95% CI, 2.8-4.6 hours; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intercalary reconstruction of tibia sarcomas with massive bone allografts supplemented with vascularized fibula grafts provide predictable results. Complications occur as expected in a biologic reconstruction, but are salvageable, preserving the original construct. The pedicled fibula can be an alternative to a free contralateral fibula for intraepiphyseal resections. Comparative technical ease, shorter surgical time, avoidance of additional microvascular anastomosis, and avoidance of surgery on the contralateral leg are notable advantages of pedicled vascularized fibula over free fibula grafts to supplement allografts when indicated in intercalary tibia resections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Reconstruction of massive post-sternotomy defects with allogeneic bone graft: four-year results and experience using the method.

OBJECTIVES: Deep sternal wound infection poses a serious problem in cardiac surgery, with an up to 40% risk of mortality. Massive loss of sternum bone tissue and adjacent ribs results in major chest wall instability causing respiratory insufficiency and defects of soft tissue healing. Proposals for managing the situation have been published but the complexity of the issue precludes unequivocal resolution. Capitalizing on orthopaedic experience, we used allogeneic bone graft of sternum as a viable option. METHODS: We performed the transplantation of allogeneic bone graft in 10 patients. In 9 cases, an allograft of sternum was used and in 1 case an allograft of calva bone. After the primary cardiac surgery, a massive post-sternotomy defect of the chest wall had developed in all 10 patients. Vacuum wound drainage was applied in the treatment of all patients. To stabilize the transverse, titanium plates were used. Bone allograft was prepared by the official Tissue Centre. Crushed allogeneic spongy bone was applied to reinforce the line of contact of the graft and the edges of residual skeleton. In 9 cases, the soft tissue was closed by direct suture of mobilized pectoral flaps. In 1 case, V-Y transposition of pectoral flap was performed. RESULTS: In 6 cases, healing of the reconstructed chest wall occurred without further complications. In 3 cases, additional re-suture of the soft tissues and skin in the lower pole of the wound was necessary. Excellent chest wall stability along with the adjustment of respiratory insufficiency and good cosmetic effect was achieved in all cases. In 1 case, severe concomitant complications and no healing of the wound resulted in death within 6 months after the reconstruction. Median follow-up of all patients in the series was 14.1 months (1-36 months). In 4 patients, scintigraphy of the chest wall was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Our existing results show that allogeneic bone graft transplantation is a promising and easily applied method in the management of serious tissue loss in sternal dehiscence with favourable functional and cosmetic effects. The relatively small number of patients with such severe healing complications of sternotomy however puts critical limits to a more detailed comparison with other practices and evaluation of long-term results.

[Low grade parosteal osteosarcoma. Clinical and oncological outcomes]. / Osteosarcoma parostal de bajo grado. Evolución oncológica y clínica.

The objective of the study was to analyze a group of patients with low grade parosteal osteosarcoma treated with limb salvage surgery and reconstructed with bone allograft. A retrospective review from our oncologic data base between 1980 and 2010 was done and all patients with diagnosis of low grade parosteal osteosarcoma, treated with limb salvage surgery and reconstructed with allograft were included. Twenty-two patients were included for the analysis. The mean age was 32±11 years (10-59) y the mean follow-up 93±69 months (8-237). Ten year overall survival of the series was 91% (95% CI: 79-100). Four patients developed local recurrence, 2 of them histological classified after the resection dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Two patients developed distant recurrence, being the lung the only site of metastasis. Ten year limb salvage reconstruction survival was 65% (95% CI: 44-86). Long term survival rate in low grade parosteal osteosarcoma is over 90%. Surgical resection wide margin should be the elective treatment and biological limb salvage reconstruction is a good alternative.

Osteosarcoma parostal de bajo grado: Evolución oncológica y clínica / Low grade parosteal osteosaroma. Clinical and oncological outcomes]

El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar una serie de pacientes con osteosarcoma parostal de bajo grado y los resultados de su tratamiento quirúrgico y reconstrucción con un trasplante óseo. Se realizó una búsqueda retrospectiva en nuestra base de datos oncológica entre 1980 y 2010 de todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de osteosarcoma parostal. Se incluyeron para el análisis únicamente los osteosarcomas parostales de bajo grado, tratados quirúrgicamente con cirugía de conservación de miembro y reconstruidos con trasplante óseo cadavérico fresco congelado. Se incluyeron 22 pacientes en el estudio. La edad media de la serie fue de 32 ± 11 años (10-59) y el seguimiento medio de 93 ± 69 meses (8-237). La supervivencia global de los pacientes analizados fue de 91% (IC95%: 79-100) a 10 años. Cuatro pacientes (18%) presentaron una recidiva local de la enfermedad, dos de éstas fueron clasificadas histológicamente como osteosarcoma parostal desdiferenciado. Dos pacientes desarrollaron enfermedad a distancia, siendo el pulmón el único sitio de localización. La tasa de supervivencia de las reconstrucciones de la cirugía de conservación de miembro a 10 años fue de 65% (IC95%: 44-86). La supervivencia a largo plazo de los pacientes con osteosarcoma parostal de bajo grado es superior al 90%. La resección quirúrgica con márgenes amplios debe ser el tratamiento de elección y la reconstrucción biológica es una alternativa válida.

The objective of the study was to analyze a group of patients with low grade parosteal osteosarcoma treated with limb salvage surgery and reconstructed with bone allograft. A retrospective review from our oncologic data base between 1980 and 2010 was done and all patients with diagnosis of low grade parosteal osteosarcoma, treated with limb salvage surgery and reconstructed with allograft were included. Twenty-two patients were included for the analysis. The mean age was 32 ± 11 years (10-59) y the mean follow-up 93 ± 69 months (8-237). Ten year overall survival of the series was 91% (95%CI: 79-100). Four patients developed local recurrence, 2 of them histological classified after the resection dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Two patients developed distant recurrence, being the lung the only site of metastasis. Ten year limb salvage reconstruction survival was 65% (95%CI: 44-86). Long term survival rate in low grade parosteal osteosarcoma is over 90%. Surgical resection wide margin should be the elective treatment and biological limb salvage reconstruction is a good alternative.

Survival, recurrence, and function after epiphyseal preservation and allograft reconstruction in osteosarcoma of the knee.

BACKGROUND: Bone tumor resections for limb salvage have become the standard treatment. Recently, intercalary tumor resection with epiphyseal sparing has been used as an alternative in patients with osteosarcoma. The procedure maintains normal joint function and obviates some complications associated with osteoarticular allografts or endoprostheses; however, long-term studies analyzing oncologic outcomes are scarce, and to our knowledge, the concern that a higher local recurrence rate may be an issue has not been addressed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wanted to assess (1) the overall survival in patients treated with this surgical technique; (2) the percentage of local recurrence and limb survival, specifically the incidence of recurrence in the remaining epiphysis; (3) the frequency of orthopaedic complications, and, (4) the functional outcomes in patients who have undergone intercalary tumor resection. METHODS: We analyzed all 35 patients with osteosarcomas about the knee (distal femur and proximal tibia) treated at our center between 1991 and 2008 who had resection preserving the epiphysis and reconstruction with intercalary allografts. Minimum followup was 5 years, unless death occurred earlier (mean, 9 years; range, 1-16 years), and no patients were lost to followup. During the study period, our indications for this approach included patients without metastases, with clinical and imaging response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, that a residual epiphysis of at least 1 cm thickness could be available after a surgical margin width in bone of 10 mm was planned, and 16% of patients (35 of 223) meeting these indications were treated using this approach. Using a chart review, we ascertained overall survival of patients, oncologic complications such as local recurrence and tumor progression, limb survival, and orthopaedic complications including infection, fracture, and nonunion. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient function was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS)-93 scoring system. RESULTS: Overall survival rate of the patients was 86% (95% CI, 73%-99%) at 5 and 10 years. Five patients died of disease. No patient had a local recurrence in the remaining bony epiphysis, but three patients (9%; 95% CI, 0%-19%) had local recurrence in the soft tissue. The limb survival rate was 97% (95% CI, 89%-100%) at 5 and 10 years. Complications treated with additional surgical procedures were recorded for 19 patients (54%), including three local recurrences, two infections, 11 fractures, and three nonunions. In 10 of these 19 patients, the allograft was removed. Only five of the total 35 study patients (14%) lost the originally preserved epiphysis owing to complications. The mean functional score was 26 points (range, 10-30 points, with a higher score representing a better result) at final followup. CONCLUSIONS: Although the recurrence rate was high in this series, the small sample size means that even one or two fewer recurrences might have resulted in a much more favorable percentage. Because of this, future, larger studies will need to determine whether this is a safe approach, and perhaps should compare epiphyseal preservation with other possible approaches, including endoprosthetic reconstruction and/or osteoarticular allografts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Autogenous rib grafts for reconstruction of the manubrium after resection: technical refinements and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Sternal reconstruction after resection is essential for restoring the rigidity of the chest cavity. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the most physiologic or efficacious material for this procedure. We present our clinical experience with autogenous rib grafts for reconstruction of the manubrium after resection and discuss the refinements in this procedure. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of a primary neoplasm in the manubrium between March 2003 and August 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent manubrium resection and immediate reconstruction with autogenous rib grafts. RESULTS: No cases of perioperative mortality were noted. The median operation time was 129 minutes. One patient experienced mild paradoxical movement; the other patients recovered well without any complications. The median follow-up period after surgery was 69 months. Two patients died. One patient with chondrosarcoma died as a result of cardiac disease 26 months after surgery and another patient with non-Hodgkin lymphoma died as a result of local recurrence 6 months after surgery. Computed tomographic scans for the other 10 patients have shown neither dislocation nor abnormality of the transplanted ribs; moreover, no absorption of the grafts or recurrence was noted. None of the patients required prescription analgesics for the pain at the donor site at the 3-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: This case series demonstrates the successful use of autogenous rib grafts in the reconstruction of the manubrium after resection. We consider that the reconstruction technique is a safe and effective alternative to a complex problem.

Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.

Reconstruction of severe pelvic bone loss is a challenging problem in hip revision surgery. Between January 1992 and December 2000, 97 hips with periprosthetic osteolysis underwent acetabular revision using bulk allografts and the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage (APC). Twenty-nine patients (32 implants) died for unrelated causes without additional surgery. Sixty-five hips were available for clinical and radiographic assessment at an average follow-up of 14.6 years (range, 10.0 to 18.9 years). There were 16 male and 49 female patients, aged from 29 to 83 (median, 60 years), with Paprosky IIIA (27 cases) and IIIB (38 cases) acetabular bone defects. Nine cages required rerevision because of infection (3), aseptic loosening (5), and flange breakage (1). The average Harris hip score improved from 33.1 points preoperatively to 75.6 points at follow-up (P < 0.001). Radiographically, graft incorporation and cage stability were detected in 48 and 52 hips, respectively. The cumulative survival rates at 18.9 years with removal for any reason or X-ray migration of the cage and aseptic or radiographic loosening as the end points were 80.0% and 84.6%, respectively. The use of the Burch-Schneider APC and massive allografts is an effective technique for the reconstructive treatment of extensive acetabular bone loss with long-lasting survival.

Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture.

PURPOSE: Patients suffering from post traumatic osteoarthritis of the acetabulum often require a total hip arthroplasty at a relatively young age. Long-term data outcome studies for this population are lacking. We report on the long-term outcome of 20 acetabular fractures in 20 patients treated with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after a mean follow-up of 18 years (range, 12-26 years). METHODS: The group consisted of 14 males (70%) and six females (30%) with an average age of 53.3 years (range, 35-75 years) at time of surgery. No patients were lost to follow-up. Four patients died and three patients underwent a revision; at review 13 patients were still living with their implant in situ. Survivorship analysis was performed at 20 years follow-up for three endpoints. RESULTS: Survival rate with endpoint revision for any reason at 20 years postoperative was 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 40-91%), 80.0% (95% CI, 41-95%) for endpoint aseptic loosening, and 63.9% (95% CI 32-84%) for endpoint radiographic failure. Three acetabular components were revised at 14.5, 15.3, and 16.7 years postoperative. Two cups failed for aseptic loosening and one cup failed due to septic loosening. The average postoperative Harris hip score was 82 (range, 56-100). CONCLUSION: Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and the use of a cemented cup after acetabular fracture is an attractive technique with acceptable long-term results and a low complication and re-operation rate.

Surgical technique: Iliosacral reconstruction with minimal spinal instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Posterior pelvic ring reconstruction can be challenging and controversial. The choice regarding whether to reconstruct and how to reconstitute the pelvic ring is unclear. Many methods provide stability but often are technically difficult and require excessive dissection. DESCRIPTION OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: This unique reconstructive technique uses the anterior aspect of the iliac crest with its attached muscle pedicle to provide a biologic scaffold for healing. The construct is secured with pedicle screws into the posterior column and S1 vertebral body with a spinal rod locked in compression. No additional fixation is used proximally into the lumbar spine. The iliac crest remains attached to the gluteus medius, allowing potential abductor function. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed six patients who underwent iliosacral resection with this reconstruction. The mean age of the patients was 41 years. Complications were recorded. One patient died 6 months postoperatively. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1993 (MSTS '93) score and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) were obtained at a minimum 1-year followup in five patients. Healing was assessed radiographically. The minimum followup was 6 months (median, 33 months; range, 6-53 months). RESULTS: The mean MSTS '93 score was 72% and mean TESS was 66. All posterior column graft sites healed. At last followup, four of the five surviving patients had a stable pseudarthrosis at the proximal sacral site. One patient had a local recurrence and experienced failure of instrumentation without collapse or rotation of the hemipelvis 3 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This technique provides a simple way to reconstruct the pelvic ring after iliosacral resection with clinical outcomes comparable to those for other methods. The method is a potential alternative for reconstruction of the posterior pelvic ring after resecting the ilium although reliable healing of the sacral site needs to be improved.

Epidiaphyseal versus other intercalary allografts for tumors of the lower limb.

Epidiaphyseal intercalary reconstruction has become possible for bone tumors that extend into the epiphysis because advances in magnetic resonance imaging and chemotherapy allow close resection while sparing the juxtaarticular bone and joint. In a retrospective study, we questioned whether epidiaphyseal reconstructions around the knee had a clinical outcome (measured as long-term survival, complication rate, and functional score) comparable with metadiaphyseal and diaphyseal reconstructions. Between 1988 and 1999, 14 epidiaphyseal, nine metaphyseal, and 12 diaphyseal reconstructions were done, and the median followup was 7.2 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 10-year survival rate of 79% for epidiaphyseal reconstructions, which did not differ from an 89% rate for metadiaphyseal and a 75% rate for diaphyseal reconstructions. Epidiaphyseal complications included two infections, five fractures, and three nonunion treatments. Complications for all 35 grafts included three infections, 12 fractures, and nine nonunion treatments. Ultimately, six grafts failed, with infection and length of resection as predisposing factors. All epiphyseal osteotomies had tumor-free margins and no local recurrences. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for each type of intercalary reconstruction was between 23 and 24. Because the epidiaphyseal reconstruction avoids complications associated with joint reconstruction and the results are comparable with those of other types of intercalary grafts, these reconstructions should be considered if at least 1 cm of tumor-free juxtaarticular bone can be maintained.

Skeletal union following long bone reconstruction using vascularised fibula graft.

Thirteen patients had skeletal reconstruction using vascularised fibula graft following resection of the diseased bone. Eleven patients had reconstruction of the lower limbs and two patients of the upper limbs. Clinical and radiographical evidence union were achieved with the average time of 32 weeks (earliest eight weeks). Six out of 11 patients (54%) in lower limb reconstruction started weight bearing at the average of 27 weeks. Bony union in this study is comparable with other studies using vascularised fibula graft.

[Alloplastic bone replacement in resection defects of the long bones]. / Alloplastischer Knochenersatz bei Resektionsdefekten an grossen Röhrenknochen.

Tumor endoprosthesis first have been used for replacement of pathologic lesions of the proximal and distal femur or humerus. Since the development of segmental defect prosthesis and modular tumor endoprosthesis it is possible to replace neoplastic lesions of long bones with diaphyseal parts. Review of our clinic experience involving 46 cases of prosthetic replacement and only one case with a second procedure showed that this is a more viable concept than open reduction and internal fixation with methylmethacrylate supplementation.