[Better assessment, better care: Quetci, a questionnaire for assessing cognitive disorders in nursing practice]. / Mieux évaluer, mieux soigner : le Quetci, un questionnaire d'évaluation des troubles cognitifs IDE.

Cognitive disorders can have significant repercussions on the quality of care and daily life for patients. We have developed a new tool specifically designed for nursing practice to identify these problems in patients with brain tumors. The Cognitive Impairment Assessment Questionnaire for nursing practice is an objective, quick and easy-to-administer tool that is readily accepted by patients.

Cognitive Impairment and Depression in Mastocytosis: A Synthesis of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Symptoms of depression and cognitive dysfunction are commonly reported in mastocytosis. The aims of this review paper are to summarize the current literature on cognitive dysfunction and depressive symptoms, elucidate some of the mechanistic pathways underlying depressive symptoms in mastocytosis, identify gaps in the literature, and offer guidance for future research in this area. RECENT FINDINGS: The study of cognition and depression in mastocytosis is in its infancy and the methodological flaws of the current literature limit interpretability. There is preliminary evidence that some individuals with mastocytosis might experience mild deficits in memory. On average, depression symptom scores fell within the mild to moderate or sub-syndromal range. Regrettably, only one study utilized a standardized diagnostic instrument to assess major depressive disorder. The authors' tendency to inaccurately equate depressive symptoms with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder presents a notable issue. The prevalence of cognitive deficits and depression appears to be similar to other chronic illnesses. Future work needs to better characterize cognition and characterize "depression" in this population.

[Cognitive impairment in patients of cardiac surgery with senile asthenia syndrome and preastenia]. / Narusheniya kognitivnykh funktsii u patsientov kardiokhirurgicheskogo profilya s sindromom starcheskoi astenii i preastenii.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the features of the cognitive status in patients with cardiac surgery profile with senile asthenia syndrome (SAS) and preasthenia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A study included 272 patients admitted for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Screening for preasthenia and SAS in patients before surgery was performed using the Brief Battery of Physical Functioning Tests. SAS and preasthenia were detected in 15% of patients (n=41). Seventy-five patients were selected in the comparison group without asthenia. Assessment of the state of cognitive functions was carried out using screening neuropsychological scales - the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). RESULTS: The median of the MMSE score (27 [26; 28] and 28 [27; 29], p=0.04), and the MoCA score (23 [19; 25] and 25 [23; 27], p=0.0085) was significantly lower in patients with asthenia and pre-asthenia compared to patients without asthenia. According to the MoCA, about 60% of patients in the pre-asthenia-asthenia group had severe cognitive impairment, while in the group without asthenia, more than 30% of cases had normal cognitive functions (p=0.003). Significant intergroup differences were found in MoCA subtests, reflecting visuospatial skills, abstraction, verbal fluency and working memory (p=0.01-0.04). Regression analysis showed that age and physical functioning index (severity of asthenia) most significantly contributed to the basic cognitive status assessed by MoCA. CONCLUSION: Features of the cognitive status in patients of cardiac surgery with the SAS and preasthenia are impairments of visuospatial thinking, verbal fluency, abstract thinking and working memory. The MoCA was shown to be informative in determining the basic cognitive status of cardiac surgical patients. At the same time, the greatest contribution to the basic cognitive status is made by age and the indicator of physical functioning, which characterizes the degree of asthenia.

Olfactory Threshold Test as a Quick Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment: Analysis of Two Independent Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction appears prior to cognitive decline, and thus it has been suggested to be an early predictor of Alzheimer's disease. However, it is currently not known whether and how olfactory threshold test could serve as a quick screening tool for cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE: To define olfactory threshold test for screening cognitive impairment in two independent cohorts. METHODS: The participants are comprised of two cohorts in China, 1,139 inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM, Discovery cohort) and 1,236 community-dwelling elderly (Validation cohort). Olfactory and cognitive functions were evaluated by Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), respectively. Regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were carried out to determine the relation and discriminative performance of the olfactory threshold score (OTS) regarding identification of cognition impairment. RESULTS: Regression analysis showed that olfactory deficit (reducing OTS) was correlated with cognitive impairment (reducing MMSE score) in two cohorts. ROC analysis revealed that the OTS could distinguish cognitive impairment from cognitively normal individuals, with mean area under the curve values of 0.71 (0.67, 0.74) and 0.63 (0.60, 0.66), respectively, but it failed to discriminate dementia from mild cognitive impairment. The cut-off point of 3 showed the highest validity for the screening, with the diagnostic accuracy of 73.3% and 69.5%. CONCLUSION: Reducing OTS is associated with cognitive impairment in T2DM patients and the community-dwelling elderly. Therefore, olfactory threshold test may be used as a readily accessible screening tool for cognitive impairment.

Cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients.

Asymptomatic carotid stenosis has been shown to be associated with progressive neurocognitive decline, but the effects of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on this are not well defined. Due to the wide heterogeneity of studies and lack of standardization in cognitive function tests and study design, there is mounting scientific evidence to support the notion that CEA is effective in reversing or slowing neurocognitive decline; however, definitive conclusions are difficult to make. Further, while the association between ACS and cognitive decline has been well document, a direct etiological role has not been established. More research is required to elucidate the relationship between asymptomatic carotid stenosis and the benefit of carotid endarterectomy and its potential protective effects regarding cognitive decline. This article aims to review current evidence in preoperative and postoperative cognitive function in asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis undergoing CEA.

Cognitive impairment after cancer treatment: mechanisms, clinical characterization, and management.

Cognitive impairment is a debilitating side effect experienced by patients with cancer treated with systemically administered anticancer therapies. With around 19.3 million new cases of cancer worldwide in 2020 and the five year survival rate growing from 50% in 1970 to 67% in 2013, an urgent need exists to understand enduring side effects with severe implications for quality of life. Whereas cognitive impairment associated with chemotherapy is recognized in patients with breast cancer, researchers have started to identify cognitive impairment associated with other treatments such as immune, endocrine, and targeted therapies only recently. The underlying mechanisms are diverse and therapy specific, so further evaluation is needed to develop effective therapeutic interventions. Drug and non-drug management strategies are emerging that target mechanistic pathways or the cognitive deficits themselves, but they need to be rigorously evaluated. Clinically, consistent use of objective diagnostic tools is necessary for accurate diagnosis and clinical characterization of cognitive impairment in patients treated with anticancer therapies. This should be supplemented with clinical guidelines that could be implemented in daily practice. This review summarizes the recent advances in the mechanisms, clinical characterization, and novel management strategies of cognitive impairment associated with treatment of non-central nervous system cancers.

Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and cognitive impairment.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to assess the evidence supporting an association between asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) with impaired cognitive function due to chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and/or silent cerebral embolization. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed/Medline, Embase and the Cochrane databases were searched up to December 1, 2022 to identify studies focusing on the association between ACS and cognitive function, as well as the mechanisms involved. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 49 studies were identified. The evidence supports an association between ACS and progressive cognitive deterioration. The mechanisms involved in the cognitive decline associated with ACS include cerebral hypoperfusion and silent cerebral embolization. Irrespective of the mechanism involved, severe ACS is associated with a progressive decline in several aspects of cognitive function, including global cognition, memory and executive function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACS are at increased risk of developing a progressive decline in their cognitive function. The evidence from the present systematic review suggests that it may be inappropriate to consider ACS patients developing cognitive dysfunction as "asymptomatic". Besides stroke, myocardial infarction and death rates, future studies should include evaluation of cognitive function as part of their outcomes.

Cognitive outcomes after multimodal treatment in adult glioma patients: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive functioning is increasingly assessed as a secondary outcome in neuro-oncological trials. However, which cognitive domains or tests to assess, remains debatable. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to elucidate the longer-term test-specific cognitive outcomes in adult glioma patients. METHODS: A systematic search yielded 7098 articles for screening. To investigate cognitive changes in glioma patients and differences between patients and controls 1-year follow-up, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted per cognitive test, separately for studies with a longitudinal and cross-sectional design. A meta-regression analysis with a moderator for interval testing (additional cognitive testing between baseline and 1-year posttreatment) was performed to investigate the impact of practice in longitudinal designs. RESULTS: Eighty-three studies were reviewed, of which 37 were analyzed in the meta-analysis, involving 4078 patients. In longitudinal designs, semantic fluency was the most sensitive test to detect cognitive decline over time. Cognitive performance on mini-mental state exam (MMSE), digit span forward, phonemic and semantic fluency declined over time in patients who had no interval testing. In cross-sectional studies, patients performed worse than controls on the MMSE, digit span backward, semantic fluency, Stroop speed interference task, trail-making test B, and finger tapping. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive performance of glioma patients 1 year after treatment is significantly lower compared to the norm, with specific tests potentially being more sensitive. Cognitive decline over time occurs as well, but can easily be overlooked in longitudinal designs due to practice effects (as a result of interval testing). It is warranted to sufficiently correct for practice effects in future longitudinal trials.

The Association of Vitamin D Status with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Subtypes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Dutch Geriatric Outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD). At the same time, this knowledge is limited specifically for vascular dementia (VaD), while data regarding other subtypes of dementia are even more limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) status with dementia subtypes in an outpatient geriatric population. METHODS: In a cross-sectional design, we analyzed data from 1,758 patients of an outpatient memory clinic in The Netherlands. Cognitive disorders were diagnosed by a multidisciplinary team according to international clinical standards. At each first-visit 25(OH)D levels were measured. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA in four models with age, gender, BMI, education, alcohol, smoking, season, polypharmacy, calcium, eGFR, and glucose as co-variates. 25(OH)D was treated as a continuous square rooted (sqr) variable. RESULTS: In the fully adjusted model, reduced 25(OH)D serum levels (sqr) were found in AD (estimated mean 7.77±0.11 CI95% 7.55-7.99): and in VaD (estimated mean 7.60±0.16 CI95% 7.28-7.92) patients compared to no-dementia (ND) patients (estimated mean 8.27±0.09 CI95% 8.10-8.45) (ND-AD: p = 0.006, CI95% 0.08-0.92.; ND-VaD p = 0.004 CI95% 0.13-1.22). We did not find differences in 25(OH)D levels of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or other dementia patients compared to ND patients, nor differences in comparing dementia subtypes. CONCLUSION: We observed significantly lower 25(OH)D serum levels in both AD and VaD patients compared to no-dementia patients, but no significant differences between MCI and Lewy body and mixed dementia subtypes in this cross-sectional study of a geriatric outpatient clinic population.

Validation of Self-Reported Cancer Diagnoses by Respondent Cognitive Status in the U.S. Health and Retirement Study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer and dementia are becoming increasingly common co-occurring conditions among older adults. Yet, the influence of participant cognitive status on the validity of self-reported data among older adults in population-based cohorts is unknown. We thus compared self-reported cancer diagnoses in the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) against claims from linked Medicare records to ascertain the validity of self-reported diagnoses by participant cognitive and proxy interview status. METHODS: Using data from HRS participants aged ≥67 who had at least 90% continuous enrollment in fee-for-service Medicare, we examined the validity of self-reported first incident cancer diagnoses from biennial HRS interviews against diagnostic claim records in linked Medicare data (reference standard) for interviews from 2000 to 2016. Cognitive status was classified as normal, cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND), or dementia using the Langa-Weir method. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and κ for cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 8 280 included participants, 23.6% had cognitive impairment without dementia (CIND) or dementia, and 10.7% had a proxy respondent due to an impairment. Self-reports of first incident cancer diagnoses for participants with normal cognition had 70.2% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity (κ = 0.79). Sensitivity declined substantially with cognitive impairment and proxy response (56.7% for CIND, 53.0% for dementia, 60.0% for proxy respondents), indicating poor validity for study participants with CIND, dementia, or a proxy respondent. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported cancer diagnoses in the U.S. HRS have poor validity for participants with cognitive impairment, dementia, or a proxy respondent. Population-based cancer research among older adults will be strengthened with linkage to Medicare claims.

Binary classification threatens the validity of cognitive impairment detection.

OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological literature reports varying prevalence of cognitive impairment within patient populations, despite assessment with standardized neuropsychological tests. Within the domain of oncology, the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) proposed standard cutoff points to harmonize the operationalization of cognitive impairment. We evaluated how this binary classification affects agreement between two highly comparable test batteries. METHOD: Two hundred non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancer patients who finished treatment (56% females; median age 53 yrs) completed traditional tests and their online equivalents in a counterbalanced design. Following ICCTF standards, impairment was defined as a score of ≥ 1.5 standard deviations (SDs) below normative means on two tests and/or ≥ 2 SDs below normative means on one test. Agreement of classification between traditional and online assessment was evaluated using Cohen's κ. Additional Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to demonstrate how different cutoff points and test characteristics affect agreement. RESULTS: The correlation between total scores of traditional and online assessment was .78. Proportions of impaired patients did not differ between assessment methods: 40% using traditional tests and 38% using online equivalents, χ²(1) = .17, p < .68. Nevertheless, within-person agreement in impairment classification between traditional and online assessment was merely fair (K = .35). Monte Carlo simulations showed similarly low agreement scores (K = .41 for 1.5 SD; K = .33 for 2 SD criterion). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that binary classification can lead to a situation where two highly similar batteries fail to identify the same individuals as impaired. Additional simulations suggest that within-person agreement between assessment methods using binary classification is inherently low. Modern statistical tools may help to improve validity of impairment detection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

[Evaluation of cognitive impairments in people affected by accidental radiation exposure]. / Otsenka kognitivnykh narushenii u lits, podvergshikhsya avariinomu radiatsionnomu vozdeistviyu.

Objective of the research is to evaluate cognitive impairments in persons affected by accidental radiation exposure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved residents of the settlements located in the Techa River basin that are included into the database «Man¼ of the URCRM. The main group «case¼ consisted of 38 people with the dose to soft tissues ≥0.07 Gy. 38 people with the dose to soft tissues not exceeding the background level were selected using the matched pair case-control method («control¼). The following methods were used: clinical method, method of evaluation of cognitive evoked potentials, clinical and psychological method, statistical methods. RESULTS: In the group «case¼ the number of examined people with mild cognitive impairment (F06.7) to increase. There are statistically significantly more people with cognitive impairments (p=0.039; OR=2.9; 95% CI: 1.2-7.5), dissomnic disorder (p=0.022; OR=2.6; 95% CI: 1.04-6.6), complaints of difficulty remembering current events (p=0.034; OR=2.8; 95% CI: 1.1-7.5). In this group statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of individual values of P300 latency (p=0.009) are observed. The number of people with P300 latency increased by ≥3 Σ is also statistically significantly higher (p=0.025; OR=6.4; 95% CI: 1.3-31.7) in this group. CONCLUSION: In the group «case¼: cognitive impairments are more pronounced. It is manifested in the increase in the number of examined people with organic cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, complaints of deterioration of cognitive functions, prolongation of P300 latency.

Blood pressure mediated the effects of cognitive function impairment related to aluminum exposure in Chinese aluminum smelting workers.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects that the Al on blood pressure and the effect of hypertension in aluminum-induced cognitive impairment in electrolytic aluminum worker. METHODS: The study was conducted 392 male aluminum electrolytic workers in an aluminum plant of China. The concentration of alumina dust in the air of the electrolytic aluminum workshop is 1.07 mg/m3-2.13 mg/m3. According to the Permissible concentration-Time Weighted Average of alumina dust is 4 mg/m3, which does not exceed the standard. The blood pressure of the workers was measured. The plasma aluminum concentration of workers was determined by ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry). Cognitive functions were measured using MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), VFT (Verbal Fluency Test), ATIME (Average Reaction Time), FOM (Fuld Object Memory Evaluation), DST (Digit Span Test), CDT (Clock Drawing Test) scales. Modified Poisson regression was used to analyze the risk of hypertension and cognitive impairment with different plasma aluminum concentrations. Generalized linear regression model was used to analyze the relationship between aluminum and cognitive function, blood pressure and cognitive function. Causal Mediation Analysis was used to analyze the mediation effect of blood press in aluminum-induced cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Plasma aluminum appeared to be a risk factor for hypertension (PR (prevalence ratio) = 1.630, 95 %-CI (confidence interval): 1.103-2.407), systolic blood pressure (PR = 1.578, 95 %-CI: 1.038-2.399) and diastolic blood pressure (PR = 1.842, 95 %-CI: 1.153-2.944). And plasma aluminum increased by e-fold, the scores of MMSE and VFT decreased by 0.630 and 2.231 units respectively and the time of ATIME increased by 0.029 units. In addition, generalized linear regression model showed that blood press was negatively correlated with the scores of MMSE and VFT. Finally, causal Mediation Analysis showed that hypertension was a part of the mediating factors of aluminum-induced decline in MMSE score, and the mediating effects was 16.300 % (7.100 %, 33.200 %). In addition, hypertension was a part of the mediating factors of aluminum-induced decline in VFT score, and the mediating effects was 9.400 % (2.600 %, 29.000 %) CONCLUSION: Occupational aluminum exposure increases the risk of hypertension and cognitive impairment. And hypertension may be a mediating factor of cognitive impairment caused by aluminum exposure.

Diagnostic performance of brief cognitive tests in cognitive impairment screening.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of brief cognitive tests for cognitive impairment (CI) screening recommended by the Spanish guidelines for the integral care of people with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a phase iii study into the accuracy of diagnostic tests, including patients with suspected CI in a primary care setting. All patients completed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Mini Examen Cognoscitivo (MEC), the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), the Memory Impairment Screen (MIS), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), the Eurotest, the Fototest, and the Memory Alteration Test (M@T). CI was diagnosed independently by researchers blinded to scores on these tests. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The study included 141 individuals (86 with CI). The Eurotest and M@T (AUC±SE: 0.91±0.02 and 0.90±0.02, respectively) took longer to administer (mean [SD]: 7.1 [1.8] and 6.8 [2.2]min, respectively) and have significantly better diagnostic performance compared to the MMSE, MEC, SPMSQ, and CDT, but not compared to MIS or Fototest (both with an AUC of 0.87±0.03), with the latter taking less than half as long to administer (2.8 [0.8]min). The M@T and MIS only evaluate memory, and the latter cannot be administered to illiterate people. CONCLUSION: The most advisable tests for CI screening in primary care are the Eurotest, M@T, and Fototest, with the latter being the most efficient as it takes half as long to administer.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on screening for mild cognitive impairment in primary healthcare.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive disorders and dementia have an important effect on individual independence and orientation. According to the Alzheimer's Disease International (ADI) 75% of people with dementia are not diagnosed; this may be as high as 90% in some low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the test performance of screening tools and compare them pairwise. The findings of our study can support countries in planning to establish and care for mild cognitive impairment in primary health centers. METHODS: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane, Dare, All EBM Reviews, CRD (OVID), and Proquest were searched from 2012 to November 2021. The risk of bias was assessed through the QUADAS-2 instrument. Given the high heterogeneity between studies, a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect sizes for diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve indices). I2 test was used for assessing heterogeneity and predefined subgroup analyses were performed using participants' age, country's income, and sample size of studies. RESULTS: A systematic search identified 18,132 records, of which, 20 studies were included in the quality assessment, and six were included in quantitative analysis. None of the studies had examined the feasibility or efficiency of mass screening. According to a pairwise comparison, IQCODE, AD8 and GPCOG showed equal or better diagnostic performance relative to the MMSE in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The random-effect model for the MMSE showed the pooled sensitivity equal to 0.73 (95% CI 0.57-0.90), the pooled specificity equal to 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.90), and the pooled AUC equal to 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93). CONCLUSION: Several benefits have been attached to short tests making them a suitable choice for use in primary healthcare settings. Considering factors such as accuracy, time of application, ease of scoring, and utilization charges, tests such as IQCODE, AD8, and GPCOG or appropriate combination with counterpart tools seem to be good alternatives to the use of the MMSE in primary care.

Combining subjective and objective appraisals of cognitive dysfunction in patients with cancer: a deeper understanding of meaning and impact on suffering?

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer often experience cognitive dysfunction, which may influence decision making, self-perception, and existential well-being. However, there is little evidence regarding this issue. This study analysed associations between objective neuropsychological measures and patients' self-report of cognitive dysfunction interfering with everyday life, general well-being, and sense of existential value. METHODS: A mixed method study assessed 13 adult patients with advanced cancer with validated neuropsychological tests, which assessed sustained attention, psychomotor speed, memory/attention, mental flexibility, and a measure of global cognitive function. These were followed by semi-structured interviews focusing on subjective experiences of cognitive dysfunction. Agreement between subjective and objective measures were analysed by Cohen's Kappa (k). Thematic analysis explored associations with cognitive deficits. RESULTS: Poor cognitive performance on the neuropsychological tests was observed regarding sustained attention (n = 8), psychomotor speed (n = 1), memory/attention (n = 2), mental flexibility (n = 9), and global cognitive function (n = 3). Almost all patients (n = 12) had complaints of cognitive dysfunction. However, the agreement between the two assessments was weak (k ≤ 0.264). Cognitive dysfunction challenged the patients with regard to practice everyday life including their existential values related to meaning of life and well-being. Adjustment of the sense of living according to one's existential values and changes of self-perception were also related positively and negatively to existential well-being. CONCLUSION: Despite the weak agreement between objective and subjective measures of cognitive function, many of the patients reported experiences of cognitive dysfunction that had an impact on their daily life and existential well-being, adding to the suffering experienced.

Difference in GFAP Levels in POCD and Non-POCD Patients After on Pump CABG.

Introduction: On-pump, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most common cause of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after cardiac surgery. Previous studies showed that the incidence of POCD after cardiac surgery was 60%, higher than non-cardiac surgery with 11.7%. Glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) is one of the sensitive biomarkers of brain damage. Previous studies have found that elevated GFAP serum is associated with cognitive impairment. This study aims to measure the difference in GFAP levels in POCD and non-POCD patients after CABG on-pump surgery. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort design study. The data were obtained from 56 subjects undergoing elective CABG on the pump surgery enrolled into two groups consisting of 28 POCD as a case group and 28 non-POCD as a control group. In this study, the ELISA method measured the levels of GFAP biomarkers within 24 hours after surgery. After 72 hours, the patient received a MoCA-INA examination to determine cognitive impairment. Data analysis was carried out by SPSS 23.00 software. Results: The mean age of patients in both groups was 60 years and was dominated by males (>85%). POCD patients were found to have a significantly longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp surgery than non-POCD patients (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004). Postoperative GFAP levels in POCD patients were significantly higher than in non-POCD patients (12.95 ± 7.47 vs 3.80 ± 2.77, p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in GFAP levels compared with non-POCD (8.28 ± 7.24 vs -1.5 ± 3.03, p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) value of GFAP against POCD was 0.887, cut-off GFAP 4.750 with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 71.4%. Conclusion: POCD patients had higher GFAP levels than non-POCD patients. There are differences in GFAP levels in patients with POCD and non-POCD post-CABG surgery.

Cognition: development of a cognitive testing battery on the iPad for the evaluation of patients with brain Mets.

To make assessment of neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases more reliable and feasible, Brainlab AG developed an application 'Cognition' for the iPad by gamifying validated paper and pencil tests. This study aims at validating the computerized tests. We assessed reliability and comparability of 'Cognition' with similar well-established paper and pencil tests in two consecutive sessions per participant. The electronic tests used the same assignments with different stimuli than the paper and pencil tests. Domains involved are learning and memory, attention and processing speed, verbal fluency and executive functions. In total 5 employees and 25 cancer patients without disease in the CNS participated, of whom 24 completed both sessions. Reliability was found satisfying for the domains learning and memory (p = 0.08; p = 0.612; p = 0.4445) and verbal fluency (p = 0.064). A learning effect showed for attention and processing speed (p = 0.001) while executive functioning showed a significant decline, possibly due to radiotherapy-related fatigue (p = 0.013). Concerning comparability between electronic and paper results, a significant correlation was found for attention and processing speed (p = 0.000), for verbal fluency (p = 0.03), for executive functions (p = 0.000), but not for learning and memory (p = 0.41; p = 0.25). Overall 'Cognition' showed moderate comparability, probably caused by the consecution of tests during sessions and the unfamiliarity with electronic test in older patients. After improving its functionality, the application needs to be validated in patients with brain metastases before it can detect cognitive decline and possible early radiation toxicity or relapses.

Estudio exploratorio para la validación de la Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) en la población con esclerosis múltiple remitente recurrente del Hospital San Juan de Dios en Santiago de Chile / Exploratory study for the validation of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) in the population with recurrent remitting multiple sclerosis of the San Juan de Dios Hospital in Santiago, Chile

La evaluación cognitiva en personas adultas con esclerosis múltiple (EM) es un área fundamental a tener en cuenta en el proceso de intervención, debido a la alta prevalencia de deterioro cognitivo. En la actualidad, se ha recomendado la evaluación cognitiva por medio de la BICAMS (del inglés Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS), que es una batería específica para evaluar a personas con EM, pero que no cuenta con validación en nuestro país. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo identificar el impacto de algunos factores clínicos (meses de evolución de la enfermedad y nivel de discapacidad) y personales (sexo, años de escolaridad y edad) que influyen en las medidas cognitivas de la BICAMS, a fin de contar con información relevante y precisa en un futuro proceso de validación. La muestra estuvo constituida por 38 personas con Esclerosis Múltiple Remitente Recurrente (EMRR). Los resultados mostraron que de los cinco factores clínicos observados, solo edad y sexo influyeron de manera significativa sobre los puntajes de las tres pruebas de la BICAMS. Por lo tanto, la validación de esta batería para la población chilena debiera incluir y/o controlar ambas variables de edad y sexo.

The evaluation of cognitive aspects among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) is key when considering intervention, because of high prevalence of cognitive impairments. At present, cognitive evaluation has been recommended by means of BICAMS (Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS), which is a battery specifically constructed to assess individuals with MS. However, the battery has not been validated in Chile.The present study aims atdetermining the impact of clinical factors (months since condition's diagnosis and severeness level) and individual factors (sex, age, and years of schooling), which is expected to be accurate and valuable input for future validation processes. Sample consisted of 38 people with remittent-recurrent multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Results showed that only age and gender do significantly impact cognitive performance on all of three BICAMs subtests. Therefore, when validating this battery for Chilean individuals, both age and gender should be included and or controlled.