Quality of life, craniomandibular function, and psychosocial factors related to pain and movement in patients with head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of and the associations between health-related quality of life, pain, craniomandibular function, and psychosocial factors related to pain and fear of movement in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients diagnosed with HNC were recruited. Measurements of the maximum mouth opening range and pressure pain thresholds on the masseter muscle and the distal phalanx of the thumb were conducted, as well as a battery of self-report questionnaires were administrated, including the QoL Questionnaire (EORT QLQ-H&N35), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Spanish translation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD), and the short version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI-11). RESULTS: The study sample (66.7% men, mean age 60.12 [11.95] years) experienced a moderate impact on their QoL levels (57.68 [18.25] EORT QLQ-H&N35) and high kinesiophobia values (20.49 [9.11] TSK-TMD). Pain was present in 41% of the patients, but only 3.8% reported severe pain. 26.4% had a restricted mouth opening range, and 34.62% showed significant catastrophism levels. There were strong positive correlations between EORT QLQ-H&N35 and CF-PDI-11 (r = 0.81), between NRS and CF-PDI-11 (r = 0.74), and between PCS and CF-PDI-11 (r = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Patients with HNC experience negative effects in their QoL, related to their impairment in craniomandibular function. Fear of movement, pain intensity, and catastrophism are associated with poorer functionality; relationships that should be considered when attempting to improve health care.

[Growth disturbances of the temporomandibular joint: causes, diagnosis and treatment]. / Groeistoornissen van het kaakgewricht: oorzaken, diagnose en behandeling.

Growth disturbances of the temporomandibular Joint are characterized by mandibular asymmetry, sometimes with secondary maxillar disturbances. Although the clinical symptoms are sometimes quite severe, patients usually have no pain. There are several growth disturbances, but in this article we discuss three particular causes of facial asymmetry, namely hemimandibular growth defects; overdevelopment, underdevelopment and neoplasms of the mandibular joint. Hemimandibular overdevelopment (hyperplasia) is a growth disorder characterized by progressive asymmetry of the mandibula. Hemimandibular hypoplasia, on the other hand, is a growth disorder involving underdevelopment of the condyle mandibulae due to impingement of the growth center and ankylosing. A pronounced asymmetrical face can cause aesthetic problems and always requires diagnostics, because in addition to the hyperplasia and hypoplasia mentioned above, other causes can explain the asymmetry such as, for example, an osteoarthritis or even a tumor emanating from the base of the skull, mandibula or soft tissues.

[Minimally invasive treatments and open joint surgery for disorders of the temporomandibular joint]. / Minimaal invasieve behandelingen en opengewrichtschirurgie voor aandoeningen van het kaakgewricht.

The initial treatment of symptomatic disorders of the temporomandibular joint typically consists of a conservative approach, in which medication (painkillers and muscle relaxants), orofacial physiotherapy and splints are most important. In most cases, minimally invasive treatment options, such as arthrocentesis, arthroscopy or joint injections, are only considered when conservative methods provide insufficient symptom reduction. There is, however, an ongoing debate about the optimal treatment strategy due to an increasing body of evidence concerning the superior effectiveness in symptom reduction of minimally invasive treatment options with regard to conservative treatments. If these minimally invasive treatment options are also ineffective, open joint surgery may be considered as a last option for a select group of patients.

Temporomandibular Disorders and Orthodontics: how to conduct a screening examination? / Dysfonctionnements temporo-mandibulaires et orthodontie : comment conduire un examen de dépistage ?

Introduction: Common Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) involve the masticatory muscles, temporomandibular joints, and/or their associated structures. Clinical manifestations can vary, including sounds (cracking, crepitus), pain, and/or dyskinesias, often corresponding to a limitation of mandibular movements. Signs or symptoms of muscular or joint disorders of the masticatory system may be present before the initiation of orthodontic treatment, emerge during treatment, or worsen to the point of stopping treatment. How do you screen for common TMD in orthodontic treatment? Materials and Methods: The main elements of the interview and clinical examination for screening common TMD in the context of orthodontic treatment are clarified and illustrated with photographs. Moreover, complementary examinations are also detailed. Results: A clinical screening form for common TMD is proposed. A synthetic decision tree helping in the screening of TMD is also presented. Conclusion: In the context of an orthodontic treatment, the screening examination for common TMD includes gathering information (interview), a clinical evaluation, and possibly complementary investigations. The orthodontist is supported in this approach through the development of a clinical form and a dedicated synthetic decision tree for the screening of TMDs. Systematically screening for common TMD before initiating orthodontic treatment allows the orthodontist to suggest additional diagnostic measures, implement appropriate therapeutic interventions, and/or refer to a specialist in the field if necessary.

Introduction: Les dysfonctionnements temporo-mandibulaires (DTM) concernent les muscles masticateurs, les articulations temporo- mandibulaires et/ou leurs structures associées. Les manifestations cliniques peuvent être diverses : bruits (craquements, crépitements), algies et/ou dyscinésies correspondant le plus souvent à une limitation des mouvements mandibulaires. Or, des signes ou symptômes de troubles musculaires ou articulaires de l'appareil manducateur peuvent être présents avant le début de la prise en charge orthodontique, voire apparaître en cours de traitement ou s'aggraver au point de remettre en question la poursuite du traitement engagé. Comment conduire un dépistage de DTM communs dans le cadre d'une prise en charge orthodontique ? Matériel et méthodes: Les éléments essentiels de l'entretien et de l'examen clinique d'un dépistage des DTM communs dans le cadre d'une consultation d'orthodontie sont clarifiés et illustrés à l'aide de photographies. Le recours aux examens complémentaires a également été détaillé. Résultats: Une fiche clinique de dépistage des DTM communs est proposée. Un arbre décisionnel synthétique aidant au dépistage des DTM est présenté. Conclusion: Dans le cadre d'une consultation d'orthopédie dento-faciale, l'examen de dépistage des DTM communs inclut un recueil d'informations (entretien), une évaluation clinique et éventuellement des examens complémentaires. L'orthodontiste est soutenu dans cette démarche par la création d'une fiche clinique et d'un arbre décisionnel synthétique dédiés au dépistage des DTM. Effectuer systématiquement un dépistage des DTM communs avant d'initier un traitement orthodontique permettra à l'orthodontiste de proposer des moyens diagnostiques supplémentaires si nécessaire, et de mettre en place la prise en charge adéquate et/ou de référer à un spécialiste du domaine pour démarrer le traitement orthodontique dans les meilleures conditions.

Integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics provides insights into the molecular mechanism of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.

The deficiency of clinically specific biomarkers has made it difficult to achieve an accurate diagnosis of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) and the insufficient comprehension of the pathogenesis of the pathogenesis of TMJ-OA has posed challenges in advancing therapeutic measures. The combined use of metabolomics and transcriptomics technologies presents a highly effective method for identifying vital metabolic pathways and key genes in TMJ-OA patients. In this study, an analysis of synovial fluid untargeted metabolomics of 6 TMJ-OA groups and 6 temporomandibular joint reducible anterior disc displacement (TMJ-DD) groups was conducted using liquid and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/GC-MS). The differential metabolites (DMs) between TMJ-OA and TMJ-DD groups were analyzed through multivariate analysis. Meanwhile, a transcriptomic dataset (GSE205389) was obtained from the GEO database to analyze the differential metabolism-related genes (DE-MTGs) between TMJ-OA and TMJ-DD groups. Finally, an integrated analysis of DMs and DE-MTGs was carried out to investigate the molecular mechanisms associated with TMJ-OA. The analysis revealed significant differences in the levels of 46 DMs between TMJ-OA and TMJ-DD groups, of which 3 metabolites (L-carnitine, taurine, and adenosine) were identified as potential biomarkers for TMJ-OA. Collectively, differential expression analysis identified 20 DE-MTGs. Furthermore, the integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics analysis revealed that the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, ferroptosis were significantly enriched. This study provides valuable insights into the metabolic abnormalities and associated pathogenic mechanisms, improving our understanding of TMJOA etiopathogenesis and facilitating potential target screening for therapeutic intervention.

Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders.

How to cite this article: Mosaddad SA. Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(3):197-198. Keywords: Arthroscopy, Facial pain, Temporomandibular joint, Temporomandibular joint disorders.

Reliability of magnetic resonance for temporomandibular joint disc perforation: A 12 years retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting disc perforations in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and to establish diagnostic criteria for this purpose. The retrospective analysis included patients who had undergone preoperative MRI and TMJ arthroscopy at the same hospital. Direct and indirect signs of disc abnormalities on MRI were compared with arthroscopic findings of disc perforation. Out of 355 joints evaluated in 185 patients, arthroscopy confirmed disc perforations in 14.7% of cases. Several MRI findings were significantly associated with disc perforation, including anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR), signal alterations in the mid-disc area, disc deformity (SAMD), retrocondylar disc fragments, osteophytes, condylar bone marrow degeneration (CBMD), and joint effusion in both joint spaces (ESJS-EIJS). Regression analysis revealed that SAMD, osteophytes, and CBDM were strongly associated with disc perforation. The ROC curve showed that MRI had an AUC = 0.791, with a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 61.5%. Two diagnostic methods, one based on three findings (osteophytes, ADDwoR, and SAMD) and one based on two direct signs (ADDwoR and SAMD), yielded high sensitivity and specificity values of 80.4% and 69.8%, and 84.3% and 62.5%, respectively. In conclusion, MRI demonstrated acceptable accuracy in the detection of TMJ disc perforations, with specific diagnostic criteria offering high sensitivity and specificity. Significant MRI indicators of disc perforation included SAMD, osteophytes, and CBDM. This study provides valuable information on the use of MRI as a diagnostic tool for TMJ disc perforations.

Comparison of the TMJ arthroscopy discopexy techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This article aims to analyze which of the main arthroscopic discopexy techniques has the best results and if there are differences between the techniques for both pain and maxillary intercuspid opening. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement. An electronic search was performed with no publication date restriction in PubMed, Ovid and Embase. The PICO criteria: (P) Patients: With temporomandibular internal disorders with discopexy indication. (I) Intervention: Temporomandibular joint arthroscopic discopexy. (C) Comparison: Arthroscopic discopexy among different techniques classified as non-rigid, semi-rigid and rigid. (O) Outcomes: Impact in clinical conditions such as pain and maximum mouth opening. The inclusion criteria were Patients with temporomandibular internal disorders with discopexy indication performed with different techniques classified as non-rigid, semi-rigid and rigid. The outcomes evaluated were pain and maximum mouth opening. Case series, cohort studies, quasi-experimental studies, and randomized clinical trials with at least 3 months of follow-up were included. The exclusion criteria considered were patients with related concomitant surgeries, patients with associated neoplastic disease or connective tissue disease. A total of 1515 joints where 1400 discopexies were performed including 849 females and 204 males. The most common diagnostic was Wilkes stage III in 257 joints. For pain and oral opening, the semi-rigid technique shows the best results median (MD) 4.84 (CI 2.52-7.16; p = 0.001, I2:100%), MD -2.78 (CI -4.34, -1.21; p = 0.001, I2:99%), respectively. The rigid technique has the greatest probability for complications MD 0.14 CI 95% (0.00, -0.28). Although the semi-rigid technique showed better results, there is no statistically significant difference. However, due to the heterogeneity of the studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Evaluating changes in the condylar head after orthognathic surgery with or without articular disc repositioning: a systematic review.

Failures in orthognathic surgery are associated with different factors, including those related to untreated or undiagnosed preoperative temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. This systematic review aimed to assess potential alterations in the condylar head following orthognathic surgery. A systematic search for randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies was performed. For inclusion in the review, studies had to meet the following eligibility criteria according to the PICO framework: Patients: patients with orthognathic deformity and temporomandibular dysfunction (or temporomandibular osteoarthritis); Intervention: patients submitted to orthognathic surgery concomitantly with TMJ disjunction; Control: patients undergoing only orthognathic surgery with or without presurgical data; and Outcome: changes in temporomandibular joint position and volume. Nine studies met all the inclusion criteria and were selected for qualitative analysis. The results of this review show that simultaneous articular disc repositioning and orthognathic surgery provide better results in patients with preoperatively diagnosed condylar osteoarthritic changes. In conclusion, condylar remodelling (resorption/deposition) and its extent are determined by the direction of condylar displacement during surgery. Other factors such as age are also associated with the development of condylar resorption.

Muscle and joint mechanics during maximum force biting following total temporomandibular joint replacement surgery.

Total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) surgery is the established treatment for severe temporomandibular joint disorders. While TMJR surgery is known to increase mouth-opening capacity, reduce pain and improve quality of life, little is known about post-surgical jaw function during activities of daily living such as biting and chewing. The aim of this study was to use subject-specific 3D bite force measurements to evaluate the magnitude and direction of joint loading in unilateral total TMJR patients and compare these data to those in healthy control subjects. An optoelectronic tracking system was used to measure jaw kinematics while biting a rubber sample for 5 unilateral total TMJR patients and 8 controls. Finite element simulations driven by the measured kinematics were employed to calculate the resultant bite force generated when compressing the rubber between teeth during biting tasks. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were subsequently used to calculate muscle and TMJ loading. Unilateral total TMJR patients generated a bite force of 249.6 ± 24.4 N and 164.2 ± 62.3 N when biting on the contralateral and ipsilateral molars, respectively. In contrast, controls generated a bite force of 317.1 ± 206.6 N. Unilateral total TMJR patients biting on the contralateral molars had a significantly higher lateral TMJ force direction (median difference: 63.6°, p = 0.028) and a significantly lower ratio of working TMJ force to bite force (median difference: 0.17, p = 0.049) than controls. Results of this study may guide TMJ prosthesis design and evaluation of dental implants.

Perspective on Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: Foramen Tympanicum Defect.

BACKGROUND: Foramen tympanicum (FT) is a defect located anterior-inferior to the external acoustic meatus. We evaluated its prevalence, location, size, and relationship with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography was performed for 200 patients who presented to the Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Ahmet Kelesoglu Faculty of Dentistry Hospital. The location and size of the FT in the axial and sagittal planes were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the study parameters among age and sex groups. Patients with FT were reevaluated by two maxillofacial surgeons at the study centre. RESULTS: In total, 200 images from 400 joints were examined. Unilateral and bilateral FT (19 [9.5%] and 8 [4%], respectively) was detected in 35 (17.5%) images from 27 (13.5%) patients. Examinations were performed for TMJ disorders in 24 patients. Participants with bilateral defects had the highest rates of presence of sounds and ear pain on the left and right sides (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Foramen tympanicum can lead to TMJ disorders and spread of tumours or infections from the external auditory canal to the infratemporal fossa. The increased prevalence of such disorders in patients with bilateral FT suggests an association between them.

A translation and validation of the French version of the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire 2 (F-GTQ-2).

BACKGROUND: Limitation of mouth opening, widely known as trismus, is a major symptom altering quality of life in individuals presenting from temporomandibular joint disorder or head and neck cancer. A French-language instrument addressing jaw opening limitation following treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) or temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire-2 (GTQ-2) into French. METHODS: A French translation of the GTQ-2 was performed according to established international guidelines, leading to the French-GTQ-2 (F-GTQ-2). The validation study included 154 participants with trismus (minimum interincisal opening of ≤35 mm) following treatment for TMD or HNC and 149 age-matched participants without trismus. All participants completed the F-GTQ-2 and participants with trismus completed additional health-related quality of life questionnaires to allow for analysis of convergent validity. RESULTS: The F-GTQ-2 demonstrated retained psychometric properties with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70 for the domains, jaw-related problems, eating limitations, facial pain and somewhat lower for muscular tension (0.60). Mainly moderate correlations were found when comparing the F-GTQ-2 to other instruments, which was in line with the pre-specified hypotheses, indicating satisfactory convergent validity. Discriminant validity was found with statistically significant differences in all domains of the F-GTQ-2 between trismus and non-trismus participants. CONCLUSION: The F-GTQ-2 can be considered a reliable and valid instrument to assess jaw-related difficulties in individuals with trismus due to HNC or TMD.

Current thinking in open temporomandibular joint surgery. Is this still indicated in the management of articular temporomandibular joint disorder?

Management of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) follows a stepwise approach of conservative management, minimally invasive surgery (arthrocentesis and arthroscopy), open surgery and alloplastic replacement. The majority of patients treated in primary care and managed initially in secondary care have myofascial pain and can be managed conservatively with rest, topical NSAIDs, muscle massage, and a bite orthosis. Those who fail to improve and have articular related pain with limitation of function should initially undergo arthroscopic investigation and arthrocentesis, which is effective at resolving symptoms in 80% of patients. Arthroscopy provides the best diagnostic aid should there be a failure to improve and should enable the surgeon to appropriately plan open surgery. Historically, surgical intervention was based on a 'one size fits all' philosophy with the surgeon carrying out a procedure which they are used to doing regardless of the pathology. Prior to arthroscopy this carried an '80% chance of getting 80% better' regardless of approach. Prior arthroscopy reduced success rates to 50%-60% and a better success rate is needed. Basing surgical intervention on the pathology encountered is a sensible approach to joint management, with the surgeon performing surgery on the articular surfaces or disc as indicated. Having used this approach over the last 15 years the author has achieved success rates of 80% in the longer term and this philosophy, rationale, and technique will be discussed along with analysis of more recent publications in the field.

Comorbidities between temporomandibular disorders and somatization in young adults: exploring links with personality, emotional, and sleep disturbances.

OBJECTIVE: The comorbidities between temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and somatization and their associations with personality traits, emotional disorders, and sleep disturbances were investigated. STUDY DESIGN: Adults aged 18 to 24 years completed an electronic survey encompassing TMD symptoms (5Ts), Patient Health Questionnaire-15, Big Five Personality Inventory-10, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Data were assessed using non-parametric tests/correlation analysis and logistic regression analysis (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The sample comprised 365 participants, of whom 22.2% and 19.5% were 5Ts-negative without and with somatization, respectively, and 18.1% and 40.3% were 5Ts-positive without and with somatization, respectively. Significant differences in neuroticism, distress, depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep quality were observed between 5Ts-negative participants with somatization and 5Ts-positive participants with somatization compared with 5Ts-negative participants without somatization and 5Ts-positive participants without somatization. Distress, anxiety, stress, and sleep were moderately correlated with somatic but not TMD symptoms (rs = 0.45-0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of whether they had TMDs, participants with somatization exhibited heightened levels of neuroticism and emotional and sleep disturbances.

Recurrence of exostosis as a result of medication-induced bruxism: case study.

Introduction: Alveolar oral exostosis is a common, benign condition routinely found in dentistry. Clinical problems associated with exostoses are the maintenance of oral hygiene as well as the fabrication of prosthodontic appliances. Over time, exostoses may contribute to irritation and periodontal disease. Case description: The patient in this case study had a recurrence of exostoses and was bothered by consistent and prominent pain. She reported being a bruxer; her bruxism was exacerbated due to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and antidepressant medications. Discussion: The etiology behind the recurrence of exostosis is discussed. The most evident etiology seems to be persistence of medication-induced bruxism, specifically awake bruxism. Conclusion: It is necessary to take a proper history to identify the cause of the recurrence of exostosis. Dental hygienists can contribute to a better understanding of and provide better treatment options for patients who have medication-induced bruxism.

Introduction: L'exostose buccale alvéolaire est une affection bénigne courante couramment observée en dentisterie. Les problèmes cliniques associés aux exostoses sont le maintien de l'hygiène buccale ainsi que la fabrication d'appareils prosthodontiques. Avec le temps, les exostoses peuvent causer de l'irritation et des maladies parodontales. Description de cas: Dans cette étude de cas, la patiente présente des exostoses récurrentes et est dérangée par une douleur constante et proéminente. Elle a déclaré souffrir de bruxisme exacerbé par la prise de médicaments antidépresseurs et contre le trouble déficitaire de l'attention avec hyperactivité. Discussion: L'étiologie derrière la récurrence de l'exostose est abordée. L'étiologie la plus évidente semble être la persistance du bruxisme induit par les médicaments, en particulier le bruxisme diurne. Conclusion: Il est nécessaire d'obtenir les antécédents médicaux appropriés pour identifier la cause de la récurrence de l'exostose. Les hygiénistes dentaires peuvent contribuer à une meilleure compréhension et offrir de meilleures options de traitement aux patients atteints de bruxisme induit par les médicaments.

The relationship between pregnancy and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) through diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) axis II evaluation: a case-control cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: This study focuses on temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), which affect the temporomandibular joint and related muscles and have multiple causes. Recent studies have examined the connection between menstrual cycles, estrogen levels, and TMDs, but results are inconsistent, highlighting the need for more research. The aim is to explore the prevalence of TMDs in pregnant women and consider how hormonal changes during pregnancy might influence these disorders. METHODS: In this cross-sectional case-control study, we compared 32 pregnant women with 35 non-pregnant women. We evaluated several TMD-related factors such as pain levels, chronic pain classification, scores on the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-20 and Oral Behaviors Checklist, and psychological health. We used various statistical methods including descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, linear regression, and adjustments for multiple comparisons to analyze the data. RESULTS: Pregnant women showed different pain perceptions, generally reporting less pain and lower severity. Nonetheless, these differences were not uniform across all TMD-related measures. Linear regression did not find a consistent link between pregnancy and TMD scores, except for chronic pain grade, which was not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. There was a significant relationship between depression and TMD severity, emphasizing the need to consider mental health in TMD evaluations. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that pregnancy is neither a risk nor a protective factor for TMD. Differences in pain perception, functional status, and psychological health were observed in pregnant women but were not consistent for all TMD-related aspects. The role of estrogen in TMJ health and TMD risk is complex and requires further study. The research highlights the necessity of including mental health, especially depression, in TMD assessments. More comprehensive research with larger sample sizes is essential to better understand the connections between pregnancy, TMD, and hormones, aiming to improve TMD management in pregnant women and others.

Did temporomandibular gap arthroplasty with temporalis interpositional flap improve function and pain in patients with end-stage joint disease? A 5-year retrospective follow-up.

The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with end-stage temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disease treated with gap arthroplasty with temporalis interpositional flap (GAT) had improved maximal interincisal opening (MIO) and TMJ pain in a long-term perspective. All patients with severe osteoarthritis, or fibrous or bony ankyloses, and subjected to GAT between 2008 and 2015 were included. The criteria of treatment success were TMJ pain VAS score ≤4 and MIO ≥30 mm. Reoperation was considered as a failure. Forty-four patients (mean age 47 years) were included in this retrospective descriptive case series and followed up for up to 7 years (mean 4.5). Comorbidities were frequent (n = 34) and most commonly rheumatic disease (n = 17). The indications for surgery were ankylosis (n = 32) or severe osteoarthritis (n = 12). Of the 44 included patients, 84% (n = 37) had a history of earlier TMJ surgery. The preoperative mean values for TMJ pain and MIO (VAS 7 and 23 mm, respectively) changed significantly (p < 0.001) to postoperative means of VAS 3 and 34 mm, respecitvely. The success rate was 59% (n = 26). When compared with a previous 2-year follow-up, the success rate was found to have decreased over time (p = 0.0097). The rate of successful treatment outcome in terms of MIO alone was 82% (n = 36). The most common reason for treatment failure was residual pain. In conclusion, the success-rate after GAT did not show long-term stability and continued to drop over time in this patient cohort. TMJ pain seems to be the main reason for failure.

Evidence for minimally invasive treatment-A systematic review on surgical management of disc displacement.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement (DD) has been established in different forms since over a century. Ther is a consensus to perform minimal invasive interventions as first-line surgical treatment since there are no evidence on best surgical practice yet. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a complex systematic review (SR) on the topic-is there evidence for surgical treatment of TMJ DD? METHODS: The PICO was defined as DD patients (population), treated with different surgical interventions including arthrocentesis (intervention), compared with other or no treatment (control) regarding the outcome variables mandibular function, mouth opening capacity, TMJ pain, etcetera (outcome). For identification of prospective controlled trials and SRs, a search strategy was developed for application in three databases. RESULTS: The search yielded 4931 studies of which 56 fulfilled the stipulated PICO. Studies with low or moderate risk of bias were possible to include in meta-analyses. There were evidence suggesting arthrocentesis being more effective compared to conservative management (maximum interincisal opening (MIO): p < .0001, I2 = 22%; TMJ pain: p = .0003, I2 = 84%) and arthrocentesis being slightly more effective than arthrocentesis with an adjunctive hyaluronic acid injection (MIO: p = .04, I2 = 0%; TMJ pain: p = .28, I2 = 0%). Other treatment comparisons showed nonsignificant differences. The performed meta-analyses only included 2-4 studies each, which might indicate a low grade of evidence. CONCLUSION: Although arthrocentesis performed better than conservative management the findings should be interpreted cautiously, and non-invasive management considered as primary measure. Still, several knowledge gaps concerning surgical methods of choice remains.

Needle Therapy: A Minimally Invasive Therapeutic Concept as Part of Temporomandibular Single-Portal Arthroscopy.

The transition from a single portal to a double portal can be complex, necessitating time and training to minimize complications that rely on the operator's skill. Needle therapy is a simple method for treating symptoms that has several benefits. Consequently, this innovative strategy aims to introduce an intermediate technique that enables surgeons to perform therapeutic procedures during single-port arthroscopy.