Pediatric trauma patients with isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries may be safely managed without intensive care unit admission.

BACKGROUND: Non-operative management is the standard of care for pediatric blunt splenic injury. The American Pediatric Surgical Association recommends intensive care unit monitoring only for grade IV/V blunt splenic injury; however, variation remains regarding this practice. We hypothesized that pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to a non-intensive care unit setting would have similar outcomes to those admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS: The 2017 to 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for blunt pediatric trauma patients (≤16 years) with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries. Patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate >90 were excluded. Pediatric trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit were compared to non-intensive care unit admissions. The primary outcome was splenectomy. Bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 461 pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries, 186 (40.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive care unit patients were older than their non-intensive care unit counterparts (15 vs 14 years, P = .03). Intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit patients had a similar rate of splenectomy (0.5% vs 0.7%, P = .80) and time to surgery (19.7 vs 19.8 hours, P = .98). Patients admitted to the intensive care unit had a longer length of stay (4 vs 3 days, P < .001). There were no significant complications or deaths in either group. CONCLUSION: This national analysis demonstrated that hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to the floor or intensive care unit had a similar rate of splenectomy without complications or deaths. This aligns with American Pediatric Surgical Association recommendations that pediatric trauma patients with grade III blunt splenic injuries be managed in non-intensive care unit settings. Widespread adoption is warranted and should lead to decreased healthcare expenditures.

Mortality and its predictors in abdominal injury across sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal injuries exert a significant impact on global morbidity and mortality. The aggregation of mortality data and its determinants across different regions holds immense importance for designing informed healthcare strategies. Hence, this study assessed the pooled mortality rate and its predictors across sub-Saharan Africa. METHOD: This meta-analysis employed a comprehensive search across multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Africa Index Medicus, Science Direct, and Hinari, complemented by a search of Google Scholar. Subsequently, data were extracted into an Excel format. The compiled dataset was then exported to STATA 17 statistical software for analysis. Utilizing the Dersimonian-Laird method, a random-effect model was employed to estimate the pooled mortality rate and its associated predictors. Heterogeneity was evaluated via the I2 test, while publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot along with Egger's, and Begg's tests. RESULT: This meta-analysis, which includes 33 full-text studies, revealed a pooled mortality rate of 9.67% (95% CI; 7.81, 11.52) in patients with abdominal injuries across sub-Saharan Africa with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 87.21%). This review also identified significant predictors of mortality. As a result, the presence of shock upon presentation demonstrated 6.19 times (95% CI; 3.70-10.38) higher odds of mortality, followed by ICU admission (AOR: 5.20, 95% CI; 2.38-11.38), blunt abdominal injury (AOR: 8.18, 95% CI; 4.97-13.45), post-operative complications (AOR: 8.17, 95% CI; 4.97-13.44), and the performance of damage control surgery (AOR: 4.62, 95% CI; 1.85-11.52). CONCLUSION: Abdominal injury mortality is notably high in sub-Saharan Africa. Shock at presentation, ICU admission, blunt abdominal injury, postoperative complications, and use of damage control surgery predict mortality. Tailored strategies to address these predictors could significantly reduce deaths in the region.

"Blunt adrenal injury does not affect outcomes in the pediatric population with isolated abdominal injury- a National Trauma Data Bank Review®."

BACKGROUND: The incidence of blunt abdominal injury (BAI) in the adult population has been estimated to be between 0.03% and 4.95%. However, the impact of BAI on the pediatric population remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of National Trauma Data Bank datasets for the years 2017-2019. We included patients under the age of 18 who experienced blunt trauma and had suffered a blunt abdominal injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity score of 2 or higher. RESULTS: Out of the 8064 pediatric patients with isolated abdominal trauma, 134 patients also suffered from BAI. We found no difference in the outcomes of patients with blunt adrenal injury in terms of mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and the number of ventilator days. Within poly-trauma patients BAI was associated with worst patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that BAI has minimal clinical impact on patient outcomes in isolation. However it is associated with worst outcomes in poly trauma patients suggesting correlation with increased trauma burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The role of leukocytes in predicting whether laparotomy is required in patients with penetrating abdominal stab wound.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the importance of leukocytes, leukocyte subgroups, platelets, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in deciding whether laparotomy is required during observation in patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds who were followed up because there was no indication for an emergency laparotomy. METHODS: Patients who did not indicate an emergency laparotomy were monitored. After 48 hours from initial hospitalization, patients who did not require laparotomy were discharged nonoperatively. The total leukocytes, leukocyte subsets, platelets, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio of patients who underwent laparotomy during the follow-up compared with those who were discharged nonoperatively. The sensitivity and specificity of these laboratory values in predicting the necessity of laparotomy were calculated. RESULTS: In the operated group (n = 71), leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio examined during observation were significantly higher (P < .001). Eosinophils and lymphocytes were significantly lower (P < .001) than in nonoperated (n = 476). Based on the deviation in the reference ranges of leukocyte and its subgroups, we report the sensitivity and specificity for predicting the necessity of laparotomy as 86% and 72% for leukocyte, 88% and 75% for neutrophil, 92% and 83% for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and 72% and 77% for platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, respectively. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value was found to be 4 for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and 125 for platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (area under the curve/receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.929 and 0.808, respectively). CONCLUSION: Leukocyte, leukocyte subgroups, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio may be useful to determine if a laparotomy is necessary in patients in whom the necessity of laparotomy is undetermined owing to unclear examination findings.

How long of a postponement in surgery can a blunt hollow viscus injury patient tolerate? A retrospective study from the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: In the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma, delayed diagnosis and treatment of hollow viscus injury can occur. We assessed the effect of the time to surgery on the outcomes of blunt hollow viscus injury patients. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2012 to 2015 to identify patients with blunt hollow viscus injury for inclusion. Patients with unstable hemodynamics, concomitant intra-abdominal organ injuries, or other severe extra-abdominal injuries were excluded. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate the effect of the time to surgery on the outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 2,997 patients with blunt hollow viscus injury were studied; the mean time to abdominal surgery was 6.7 hours. Twenty-two hours was selected as a cutoff value for further analyses because of an observed transition zone at that time in the distribution of mortality and severe sepsis rates. After adjustment, patients who underwent surgery within 22 hours had a significantly lower mortality rate (1.2% vs 4.2%), lower sepsis rate (0.9% vs 4.5%), shorter hospital length of stay (8.7 vs 12.0 days), and shorter intensive care unit length of stay (1.4 vs 3.3 days). In patients who underwent surgery within 22 hours, neither mortality nor sepsis were affected significantly by the time to surgery. CONCLUSION: In the management of patients with blunt hollow viscus injury, early surgical treatment is needed. Patients with isolated blunt hollow viscus injury may have a poor outcome if they undergo abdominal surgery more than 22 hours after arrival in the emergency department.

Lessons Learned From Treating 114 Inferior Vena Cava Injuries at a Limited Resources Environment - A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The inferior vena cava is the most frequently injured vascular structure in penetrating abdominal trauma. We aimed to review inferior vena cava injury cases treated at a limited resources facility and to discuss the surgical management for such injures. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with inferior vena cava injuries who were treated at a single center between January 2011 and January 2020. Data pertaining to the following were assessed: demographic parameters, hypovolemic shock at admission, the distance that the patient had to be transported to reach the hospital, affected anatomical segment, treatment, concomitant injuries, complications, and mortality. Non-parametric data were analyzed using Fisher's exact, Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, or Kruskal-Wallis test, as applicable. The Student's t-test was used to assess parametric data. Moreover, multiple logistic regression analyses (including data of possible death-related variables) were performed. Statistical significance was set at P <0.05. RESULTS: Among 114 patients with inferior vena cava injuries, 90.4% were male, and the majority were aged 20-29 years. Penetrating injuries accounted for 98.2% of the injuries, and the infrarenal segment was affected in 52.7% of the patients. Suturing was perfomed in 69.5% and cava ligation in 29.5% of the patients, and 1 patient with retrohepatic vena cava injury was managed non-operatively. The overall mortality was 52.6% with no case of compartment syndrome in the limbs. A total of 7.9% of the patients died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The inferior vena cava is often injured by penetrating mechanisms, and the most frequently affected segment was the infrarenal segment. A higher probability of death was not associated with injury to a specific anatomical segment. Additionally, cava ligation was not related to an increased probability of compartment syndrome in the leg; therefore, prophylactic fasciotomy was not supported.

Mortality following severe liver trauma is declining at Auckland City Hospital: a 14-year experience, 2006-2020.

INTRODUCTION: Liver injuries sustained in blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma may cause serious patient morbidity and even mortality. AIM: To review the recent experience of liver trauma at Auckland City Hospital, describing the mechanism of injury, patient management, outcomes and complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed, including all patients admitted to Auckland City Hospital with liver trauma identified from the trauma registry. Patient clinical records and radiology were systematically examined. RESULTS: Between 2006-2020, 450 patients were admitted with liver trauma, of whom 92 patients (20%) were transferred from other hospitals. Blunt injury mechanisms, most commonly motor-vehicle crashes, predominated (87%). Stabbings were the most common penetrating mechanism. Over half of liver injuries were low risk American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade I and II (56%), whereas 20% were severe grade IV and V. Non-operative management was undertaken in 72% of patients with blunt liver trauma and 92% of patients with penetrating liver trauma underwent surgery. Liver complications occurred in 11% of patients, most commonly bile leaks (7%), followed by delayed haemorrhage (2%). Thirty-two patients died (7%), with co-existing severe traumatic brain injury as the leading cause of death. There was a significant reduction in death from haemorrhage in patients with grade IV and V liver trauma between the first and second half of the study period (p=0.0091). CONCLUSION: Although the incidence and severity of liver trauma at Auckland City Hospital remained stable, there was a reduction in mortality, particularly death as a result of haemorrhage.

Efficacy of past, present, and future fluid strategies in an improved large animal model of non-compressible intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Noncompressible hemorrhage is a leading cause of potentially survivable combat death, with the vast majority of such deaths occurring in the out-of-hospital environment. While large animal models of this process are important for device and therapeutic development, clinical practice has changed over time and past models must follow suit. Developed in conjunction with regulatory feedback, this study presents a modernized, out-of-hospital, noncompressible hemorrhage model, in conjunction with a randomized study of past, present, and future fluid options following a hypotensive resuscitation protocol consistent with current clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled experiment comparing three fluid resuscitation options in Yorkshire swine. Baseline data from animals of same size from previous experiments were analyzed (n = 70), and mean systolic blood pressure was determined, with a permissive hypotension resuscitation target defined as a 25% decrease from normal (67 mm Hg). After animal preparation, a grade IV to V liver laceration was induced. Animals bled freely for a 10-minute "time-to-responder" period, after which resuscitation occurred with randomized fluid in boluses to the goal target: 6% hetastarch in lactated electrolyte injection (HEX), normal saline (NS), or fresh whole blood (FWB). Animals were monitored for a total simulated "delay to definitive care" period of 2 hours postinjury. RESULTS: At the end of the 2-hour study period, 8.3% (1 of 12 swine) of the HEX group, 50% (6 of 12 swine) of the NS group, and 75% (9 of 12 swine) of the FWB had survived (p = 0.006), with Holm-Sidak pairwise comparisons showing a significant difference between HEX and FWB and (p = 0.005). Fresh whole blood had significantly higher systemic vascular resistance and hemoglobin levels compared with other groups (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Survival data support the movement away from HEX toward NS and, preferably, FWB in clinical practice and translational animal modeling. The presented model allows for future research including basic science, as well as translational studies of novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and devices.

High Mortality and Venous Thromboembolism Risk Following Major Penetrating Abdominal Venous Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating injuries to the inferior vena cava and/or iliac veins are a source of hemorrhage but may also predispose patients to venous thromboembolism (VTE). We sought to determine the relationship between iliocaval injury, VTE and mortality. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for penetrating abdominal trauma from 2015-2017. Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics and outcomes based on presence of iliocaval injury. Multivariable analyses determined the effect of iliocaval injury on VTE and mortality. RESULTS: Of 9,974 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma, 329 had iliocaval injury (3.3%). Iliocaval injury patients were more likely to have a firearm mechanism (83% vs. 43%, P < 0.001), concurrent head (P = 0.036), spinal cord (P < 0.001), and pelvic injuries (P < 0.001), and higher total injury severity score (median 20 vs. 8.0, P < 0.001). They were more likely to undergo 24-hr hemorrhage control surgery (69% vs. 17%, P < 0.001), but less likely to receive VTE chemoprophylaxis during admission (64% vs. 68%, P = 0.04). Of patients undergoing iliocaval surgery, 64% underwent repair, 26% ligation, and 10% unknown. Iliocaval injury patients had higher rates of VTE (12% vs. 2%), 24-hr mortality (23% vs. 2.0%) and in-hospital mortality (33% vs. 3.4%) (P < 0.001 for all). VTE rates were similar following repair (14%) and ligation (17%). Iliocaval injury patients also had higher rates of cardiac complications (10.3% vs. 1.4%), acute kidney injury (8.2% vs. 1.3%), extremity compartment syndrome (4.0 vs. 0.2%), and unplanned return to OR (7.9% vs. 2.5%) (P < 0.001 for all). In multivariable analyses, iliocaval injury was independently associated with risk of VTE (OR 2.12; 95% CI, 1.29-3.48; P = 0.003), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 9.61; 95% CI, 4.96-18.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Iliocaval injuries occur in <5% of penetrating abdominal trauma but are associated with more severe injury patterns and high mortality rates. Regardless of repair type, survivors should be considered high risk for developing VTE.

Anticoagulation is Associated with Increased Mortality in Splenic Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Anticoagulation (AC) is associated with worse outcomes after trauma in some but not all studies. To further investigate the effect of AC on outcomes in patients with splenic injury, we analyzed the Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use File (PUF) METHODS: The 2017 PUF was used to identify adult (18+ y) with all mechanisms and grades of splenic injury. Demographics, comorbidities, hospital course and outcomes were compared between AC and non-AC patients. RESULTS: A total of 18,749 patients were included, 622 were on AC. The AC patients were older but had comparable gender composition to non-AC patients. Injury Severity Score (18.2 versus 22.5) and rates of serious (AIS ≥ 3) injury were all lower in the AC group (P = 0.001). AC patients received fewer units of RBC (5.7 versus 8.0 units, P < 0.001) and FFP (3.9 versus 5.4 units, P < 0.001) in the first 24 h but underwent angiography at similar rates (23.6 versus 24.5%, P = 0.8). Among those who underwent angiography, patients were more likely to undergo embolization if they were on AC (89.7 versus 73.9%, P = 0.04). Rates of splenic surgery were comparable (19.3 versus 21.5%, P = 0.2) between AC versus non-AC patients. Median LOS was longer in AC patients (6.3 versus 5.6 d, P = 0.002). AC patients had a higher mortality (13.3 versus 7.0%, P = 0.001). In a multivariable binary logistic regression, AC was an independent risk factor for mortality with OR 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.9) CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation is associated with increased mortality in patients with splenic injury.

Is there a role for REBOA? A system assessment.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze our experience to quantify potential need for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). METHODS: Retrospective review of patients over a three-year period who presented as a trauma with hemorrhagic shock. Patients were divided into two groups: REBOA Candidate vs. Non-candidates. Injuries, outcomes, and interventions were compared. RESULTS: Of 7643 trauma activations, only 37 (0.44%) fit inclusion criteria, of which 16 met criteria for candidacy for potential REBOA placement. The groups did not differ in terms of injury severity, physiology, age, timing of intervention, nor massive transfusion. Survival was linked to TRISS (p = 0.01) and Emergency Room Thoracotomy (p = 0.002). Of Candidates, 8 (50%) had injuries that could have benefited from REBOA, while 7 (44%) had injuries that could be associated with potential harm. DISCUSSION: The volume of patients who would potentially benefit from REBOA appears to be small and does not appear to support system wide adoption in the studied region. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Time to operating room matters in modern management of pancreatic injuries: A national review on the management of adult pancreatic injury at Canadian level 1 trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic injuries are rare, difficult to diagnose, and complex to manage despite multiple published guidelines. This study was undertaken to evaluate the current diagnosis and management of pancreatic trauma in Canadian trauma centers. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional retrospective study from 2009 to 2014 including patients from eight level 1 trauma centers across Canada. All patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic trauma were included. Demographics, injury characteristics, vital signs on admission, and type of management were collected. Outcomes measured were mortality and pancreas-related morbidity. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-nine patients were included. The median age was 29 years (interquartile range, 21-43 years), 72% were male, and 79% sustained blunt trauma. Pancreatic injury included the following grades: I, 26%; II, 28%; III, 33%; IV, 9%; and V, 4%. The overall mortality rate was 11%, and the pancreas-related complication rate was 25%. The majority (88%) of injuries were diagnosed within 24 hours of injury, primarily (80%) with a computed tomography scan. The remaining injuries were diagnosed with ultrasound (6%) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) (2%) and at the time of laparotomy or autopsy (12%). One hundred seventy-five patients (63%) underwent an operative intervention, most commonly a distal pancreatectomy (44%); however, there was great variability in operative procedure chosen even when considering grade of injury. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic injuries are associated with multiple other injuries and have significant morbidity and mortality. Their management demonstrates significant practice variation within a national trauma system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level V; Prognostic and epidemiological, level IV.

Obesity Protects Against Operation in Pediatric Penetrating Trauma to the Torso.

BACKGROUND: Studies in the adult population are conflicting regarding whether obesity is protective in penetrating trauma. In the pediatric population, data on obesity and penetrating trauma are limited. We sought to determine if there is a different rate of operation or of survival in pediatric and adolescent patients with obesity. METHODS: We queried the National Trauma Data Bank research data set from 2013 to 2016 for all patients aged 2-18 who sustained traumatic penetrating injuries to the thorax and abdomen. The cohort was divided into body mass index percentiles for gender and age using Center for Disease Control definitions. Outcomes included overall survival, whether or not an operative procedure was performed, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. RESULTS: We analyzed 9611 patients with penetrating trauma, of which 4285 had an operative intervention. When adjusted for other variables (age, gender, race, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and Injury Severity Score), children of every body mass index percentile had similar survival. Healthy weight patients were more likely to get an operation than patients in the obese category. Length of hospital stay was similar between groups, but the ICU length of stay was longer in the overweight and obese groups compared with healthy weight and underweight groups. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents with obesity are less likely to undergo operation after penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma. Further study is needed to determine the reason for this difference.

Retrospective study of polytrauma patients's medical records that presented abdominal trauma, comperad to abdominal trauma and extra-abdominal injuries

This study sought to retrospectively assess the relationship between intra and extra-abdominal injuries in polytrauma patients undergoing laparotomy at the Regional University Hospital of Maringá between 2017 and 2018.This study was based on 111 electronic medical records from the Brazilian public health system "SUS", admitted to the hospital due to trauma and undergoing laparotomy, comparing two groups: abdominal injury without extra-abdominal injury (WoEI) and abdominal injury with extra-abdominal injury (WiEI).A total of 111 medical records were analyzed, 57 from 2017 and 54 from 2018. Of these 111records, 43 (39%) were trauma victims with only abdominal injuries and 68 (61%) trauma victims with abdominal and extra-abdominalinjuries. Most patients were male (85%), with an average age of 33 years, ranging from 14 to 87 years. In statistical analysis, according to the T-test, there was significance (p > 0.05) between the WoEI and WiEI groups for data collected regarding death rates and hospitalization days. As for the morbidity rate and difference between genders (male and female), there was no statistical significance (p < 0.05).Polytraumapatients are exposed to greater kinetic energy, with more severe conditions and therefore required more in-hospital care.

Impact of obesity on outcomes after abdominal gunshot injury.

BACKGROUND: The impact of obesity, on outcomes after a gunshot wound, remains unclear. We hypothesized that patients with obesity have a higher burden of intraabdominal injuries after gunshot injury when compared with the nonobese population. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2013-2017) was queried for all patients age ≥16 with abdominal gunshot injuries. Patients who died in the emergency department (ED), arrived without signs of life, had Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3 in any other region, or transferred from an outside hospital were excluded. The patient with obesity was defined by a body mass index ≥ 30. Demographics, injury data, and outcomes were abstracted and analyzed. Patients with obesity were compared to those with a body mass index < 30. Multivariate logistical regression was used to compare mortality between groups. RESULTS: Of 34,138 patients with gunshot injuries, there were 2,616 (7.7%) with isolated abdominal injuries. Median age is 29 years (22-39 years), 86.7% men. Eight hundred twenty-seven (31.6%) were obese. The obese group was significantly older (32 [25-42] vs. 27 [22-37]; p < 0.001) with a higher incidence of hypertension (16.8% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (7.1% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in presenting vital signs, abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale or Injury Severity Score between groups. The rate of superficial injuries and intraabdominal organ injuries were comparable between groups. Patients with obesity had significantly higher mortality (6.5% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.010), hospital length of stay (9 [7-16] vs. 9[6-14], p < 0.001), ventilator days (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-4], p = 0.015), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (3.5% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, in addition to older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.050; p < 0.001), ED hypotension (OR, 3.192; p < 0.001), and ED tachycardia (OR, 3.714; p < 0.001), obesity was significantly associated with mortality (OR, 1.636; p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Patients with obesity are at a high risk of mortality after abdominal gunshot injury. Further prospective evaluation is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level III.

Mesenteric Vascular Injury in Trauma: An NTDB Study.

BACKGROUND: Although abdominal trauma remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, there has not been a large-scale multicenter study regarding outcomes in patients who incur mesenteric vascular injuries. The goal of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the factors associated with outcomes in patients with trauma diagnosed with mesenteric vascular injuries. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was performed on patients who sustained a mesenteric vascular injury (MVI, ICD-9 902.20-902.29) identified by the 2012 National Trauma Data Bank. Data were analyzed to identify differences in hospital length of stay, emergency room (ER) and final hospital disposition, and mortality based on patient age, gender, race, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and injury type (blunt or penetrating). RESULTS: Of the 1,133 total patients included, blunt trauma accounted for 740 (65%) of the injuries, whereas penetrating trauma accounted for 364 of the injuries (32%). Patients with penetrating injuries were 1.43 times more likely to die from their injuries than those suffering from blunt trauma (95% CI 1.04-1.98, P < 0.05). Patients with a higher ISS (>16) were 5.39 times more likely to die from their injuries than those with a lower ISS (95% CI 1.89-15.4, P = 0.002); if ISS was >25, the patient was 15.1 times more likely to die (95% CI 5.5-41.7, P < 0.001). Men were more likely to suffer from penetrating injuries than women (37% vs. 13%, P < 0.001), and African Americans were nearly 4 times more likely to present with penetrating injuries (69% vs 17%, P < 0.001). Age was also associated with mortality as patients >65 years and between 21 and 44 years were more likely to die from their injuries than patients in other age categories. Of the 740 patients with blunt MVIs, 326 (44%) were taken directly from the ER to the operating room (OR) and 306 (41%) to the intensive care unit (ICU), whereas with penetrating MVIs, 311 (85%) were taken to the OR from the emergency department and 18 (5%) to the intensive care unit. Of the 740 blunt MVIs, 115 died (16%), compared with 76 (21%) of the penetrating MVIs (P < 0.001). Injuries to the hepatic and superior mesenteric arteries were associated with higher mortality, with OR 2.03 and 3.03, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of mesenteric arterial injury warrants rapid identification and management as these injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with penetrating mechanism, injury to large mesenteric vessels, and increased ISS associated with increased mortality.

Thermoreversible Reverse-Phase-Shift Foam for Treatment of Noncompressible Torso Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is a leading cause of traumatic exsanguination, requiring emergent damage control surgery performed by a highly trained surgeon in a sterile operating environment. A self-expanding, intraabdominally deployed, thermoreversible foam is one proposed method to potentially task shift temporizing hemostasis to earlier providers and additional settings. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using Fast Onset Abdominal Management (FOAM) in a lethal swine model of NCTH. METHODS: This was a proof-of-concept study comparing FOAM intervention in large Yorkshire swine to historical control animals in the established Ross-Burns model of NCTH. After animal preparation, a Grade IV liver laceration was surgically induced, followed by a free bleed period of 10 min. FOAM was then deployed to a goal intraabdominal pressure of 60 mm Hg for 5 min, followed by a total 60-min observation period following injury. RESULTS: At the end of the experiment, the FOAM agent was found to be distributed throughout the peritoneal cavity in all animals, without signs of iatrogenic injury. The FOAM group demonstrated a significantly higher mean arterial pressure compared with historical controls and a trend toward improved survival: 82% (9/11) compared with 50% for controls (7/14; P = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the use of a thermoresponsive foam to manage NCTH and successfully demonstrated proof-of-concept feasibility of FOAM deployment. These results provide strong support for future, higher-powered studies to confirm improved survival with this novel intervention.

Optimal treatments for hepato-pancreato-biliary trauma in severely injured patients: a narrative scoping review.

SUMMARY: Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) injuries can be extremely challenging to manage. This scoping review (8438 citations) offers a number of recommendations. If diagnosis and therapy are rapid, patients with major hepatic injuries who present in physiologic extremis have high survival rates despite prolonged hospital stays. Nonoperative management of major liver injuries, as diagnosed using computed tomography, is typically successful. Adjuncts (e.g., angioembolization, laparoscopic washouts, biliary stents) are essential in managing high-grade injuries. Injury to the extrahepatic biliary tree is rare. Cholecystectomy is indicated for all gallbladder trauma. Full-thickness common bile duct injuries require a hepaticojejunostomy, although damage control remains closed suction drainage. Injuries to the pancreatic head often involve concurrent trauma to regional vasculature. Damage control necessitates drainage after stopping hemorrhage. Injury to the left pancreas commonly requires a distal pancreatectomy. Outcomes for high-grade pancreatic and liver injuries are improved by involving an HPB team. Complications are multidisciplinary and should be managed without delay.

Angioembolization in intra-abdominal solid organ injury: Does delay in angioembolization affect outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Angioembolization (AE) is an integral component in multidisciplinary algorithms for achieving hemostasis in patients with trauma. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommends that interventional radiologists be available within 30 minutes to perform emergent AE. However, the impact of the timing of AE on patient outcomes is still not well known. We hypothesized that a delay in AE would be associated with increased mortality and higher blood transfusion requirements in patients with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury. METHODS: A 4-year (2013-2016) retrospective review of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. We included adult patients (age, ≥18 years) with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury who underwent AE within 4 hours of hospital admission. Patients who underwent operative intervention before AE were excluded. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. The secondary outcome was blood product transfusions. Patients were grouped into four 1-hour intervals according to their time from admission to AE. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to accommodate patient differences. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,009,922 trauma patients, of which 924 (1 hour, 76; 1-2 hours, 224; 2-3 hours, 350; 3-4 hours, 274) were deemed eligible. The mean ± SD age was 44 ± 19 years, and 66% were male. The mean ± SD time to AE was 144 ± 54 minutes, and 92% of patients underwent AE more than 1 hour after admission. Overall 24-hour mortality was 5.2%. On univariate analysis, patients receiving earlier AE had decreased 24-hour mortality (p = 0.016), but no decrease in blood products transfused. On regression analysis, every hour delay in AE was significantly associated with increased 24-hour mortality (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Delayed AE for hemorrhagic control in blunt trauma patients with an intra-abdominal solid organ injury is associated with increased 24-hour mortality. Trauma centers should ensure timeliness of interventional radiologist availability to prevent a delay in vital AE, and it should be a focus of quality improvement projects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.

Penetrating Abdominal Aortic Injury: Comparison of ACS-Verified Level-I and II Trauma Centers.

OBJECTIVES: Penetrating abdominal aortic injury (PAAI) is a highly acute injury requiring prompt surgical management. When compared to surgeons at level-II trauma centers, surgeons at level-I trauma centers are more likely to take in-house call, and may more often be available within 15 minutes of patient arrival. Thus, we hypothesized that level-I trauma centers would have a lower mortality rate than level-II trauma centers in patients with PAAI. METHODS: We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database for patients with PAAI, and compared patients treated at American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified level-I centers to those treated at ACS level-II centers. RESULTS: PAAI was identified in 292 patients treated at level-I centers and 86 patients treated at level-II centers. Patients treated at the 2 center types had similar median age, injury severity scores and prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and smoking (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the frequency of additional intra-abdominal vascular injuries (p > 0.05). Median time to hemorrhage control (level-I: 40.8 vs level-II: 49.2 minutes, p = 0.21) was similar between hospitals at the 2 trauma center levels. We found no difference in the total hospital length of stay or post-operative complications (p > 0.05). When controlling for covariates, we found no difference in the risk of mortality between ACS verified level-I and level-II trauma centers (OR:1.01, CI:0.28-2.64, p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: Though the majority of PAAIs are treated at level-I trauma centers, we found no difference in the time to hemorrhage control, or the risk of mortality in those treated at level-I centers when compared to those treated at level-II trauma centers. This finding reinforces the ACS-verification process, which strives to achieve similar outcomes between level-I and level-II centers.