Scoping review of qualitative data of patient experience and unmet needs following facial trauma.

Facial trauma is a common presentation to the emergency department, encompassing a spectrum from soft tissue injuries to fractures of the facial skeleton. Beyond the evident physical consequences, patients frequently face significant psychosocial issues, which are often overlooked in the recovery phase of treatment. The purpose of this review was to establish the experiences of patients following facial trauma using qualitative patient-reported data. A scoping review, searching four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Library) using PRISMA methodology was conducted. Only one paper fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The paper used semi-structured open-ended interviews to obtain 20 patients' experiences of sustaining maxillofacial trauma and then synthesised the qualitative interviews into different themes. The findings from this scoping review highlight the profound need for prospective qualitative research in craniomaxillofacial traumatology, to better understand and address the experiences and perspectives of patients following facial trauma.

Predictive risk factors of adverse mental health outcomes in the facial trauma patient.

Patients with facial trauma often experience a psychological burden from their injuries. This study aimed to identify risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes in patients affected by facial trauma, using the 'Integrating Mental and Physical Healthcare: Research, Training and Services' (IMPARTS) screening tool. All patients >18 years of age who completed more than one IMPARTS screening tool in the Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma Clinic between 2019 and 2021 were included in this study. This tool was used to assess the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder, and depression. Included patients completed the IMPARTS questionnaire at initial follow-up (mean 18 days post-trauma) and one subsequent time point (mean 82 days). 167 patients were included in the study. On multivariable analysis, a history of psychiatric illness (P = 0.015) and interpersonal violence as the mechanism of injury (P = 0.010) were identified as predictive of risk of PTSD. Risk of PTSD was lower in zygomatic injuries (P = 0.001), while nasal involvement increased at-risk status for depression (P = 0.009). 47.3% of patients screened positive on initial IMPARTS assessment, while 35.3% screened positive on follow-up IMPARTS assessment. This study supports the IMPARTS tool in allowing the prompt identification of mental health adversity in facial trauma.

Post traumatic stress disorder following facial and dental trauma: preliminary findings from a study conducted in India.

This study was conducted to identify and study the prevalence of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients, who had sustained traumatic facial and dental injuries along with other variables that may affect the psychological response. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 241 patients suffering from traumatic facial and dental injuries presenting to the Ahmadabad Municipal Dental College and Hospital were included in the study. 110 patients (males - 87, females - 23) suffered disfiguring injuries and/or loss of multiple front teeth (DF). 131 patients (males - 102, females - 29) suffered no disfigurement (NDF). Assessment was carried out on day of discharge (D.O.D), 1 month, and 6 months. Impact of Event Scale (I.E.S-R) was used to assess the presence of post traumatic stress disorder in the patients. RESULTS: Patients with DF injuries had statistically significant higher mean scores than patients suffering NDF injuries. Female patients had comparatively higher scores at D.O.D, 1 month, and 6 months. Patients treated with maxillomandibular fixation and between ages 18 and 40 years also had significantly higher scores. CONCLUSION: Patients with DF facial injuries including multiple anterior teeth loss had significantly higher mean (I.E.S-R) scores for PTSD in comparison with patients with NDF facial injuries.

Head and neck burns are associated with long-term patient-reported dissatisfaction with appearance: A Burn Model System National Database study.

INTRODUCTION: Burns affecting the head and neck (H&N) can lead to significant changes in appearance. It is postulated that such injuries have a negative impact on patients' social functioning, quality of life, physical health, and satisfaction with appearance, but there has been little investigation of these effects using patient reported outcome measures. This study evaluates the effect of H&N burns on long-term patient reported outcomes compared to patients who sustained burns to other areas. METHODS: Data from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System National Database collected between 1996 and 2015 were used to investigate differences in outcomes between those with and without H&N burns. Demographic and clinical characteristics for adult burn survivors with and without H&N burns were compared. The following patient-reported outcome measures, collected at 6, 12, and 24 months after injury, were examined: satisfaction with life (SWL), community integration questionnaire (CIQ), satisfaction with appearance (SWAP), short form-12 physical component score (SF-12 PCS), and short form-12 mental component score (SF-12 MCS). Mixed regression model analyses were used to examine the associations between H&N burns and each outcome measure, controlling for medical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 697 adults (373 with H&N burns; 324 without H&N burns) were included in the analyses. Over 75% of H&N injuries resulted from a fire/flame burn and those with H&N burns had significantly larger burn size (p<0.001). In the mixed model regression analyses, SWAP and SF-12 MCS were significantly worse for adults with H&N burns compared to those with non-H&N burns (p<0.01). There were no significant differences between SWL, CIQ, and SF-12 PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors with H&N burns demonstrated community integration, physical health, and satisfaction with life outcomes similar to those of survivors with non-H&N burns. Scores in these domains improved over time. However, survivors with H&N burns demonstrated worse satisfaction with their appearance. These results suggest that strategies to address satisfaction with appearance, such as reconstructive surgery, cognitive behavior therapy, and social skills training, are an area of need for survivors with H&N burns.

Face Treatment Using Nonsurgical Mini-Invasive Techniques as Postsurgical Procedure for Traumatic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Facial trauma can cause major psychological damage and compromise a patient's quality of life. Unfortunately, surgery cannot always solve this problem or provide an acceptable result. OBJECTIVES: Treatment with injectables may provide a solution that is minimally invasive and better accepted by patients as a means to improve poor outcomes after facial trauma. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 50 patients (29 men, 21 women) who underwent primary surgery to treat facial trauma between January 2015 and January 2017. Based on the facial area affected by poor outcomes (upper face, midface, and lower face), patients underwent ≥1 aesthetic medicine treatments with hyaluronic acid dermal fillers and botulinum toxin injections. To evaluate patient satisfaction and the effect of the treatment on quality of life, patients were asked to complete 2 questionnaires, POSAS and FACE-Q, prior to treatment and 90 days after the last treatment session. RESULTS: Questionnaire scores indicated improvements in aesthetic and psychological metrics, perceived both by the patient and the observer. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive aesthetic treatments represent a valuable adjunct to surgical procedures for improving facial aesthetics after injury and consequently the quality of life of patients affected by facial trauma.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Soft-Tissue Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Evaluation of the Quality of Their Measurement Properties.

BACKGROUND: A patient's health-related quality of life can be significantly impacted by facial scarring and disfigurement. Facial soft-tissue reconstruction should aim to improve this, with outcomes measured from the patient's perspective using patient-reported outcome measures. This systematic review identifies patient-reported outcome measures for soft-tissue facial reconstruction and appraises their methodologic and psychometric properties using up-to-date methods. METHODS: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and Cochrane databases was performed. Identified patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using the updated Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist. Psychometric properties were also assessed and a modified Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation analysis was performed to aid in recommendations for future questionnaire use. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies covering nine patient-reported outcome measures were included. Methodologic quality and psychometric evidence were variable. FACE-Q, Skin Cancer Index, Patient Outcome of Surgery-Head/Neck, and the Derriford Appearance Scale 59/24 all demonstrated high enough evidence to be recommended as having potential for inclusion in future studies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review to identify and critically appraise patient-reported outcome measures for soft-tissue facial reconstruction using internationally accepted criteria. Four questionnaires were deemed to have adequate levels of methodologic and psychometric evidence, although further studies should be conducted before they are used routinely in patients undergoing facial reconstruction. Through the use of psychometrically well-validated questionnaires, it is hoped that patients' concerns can be truly appreciated, the level of care improved, and the quality of reconstructive options offered advanced.

Tratamiento con Pulsed Dye Laser de mancha de vino oporto: seguimiento a 10 años / Treatment with Pulsed Dye Laser of wine stain Porto: 10-year follow-up

Las manchas de vino de oporto son un tipo de malformación capilar que afecta del 0,3 al 0,5% de la población. Están presentes desde el nacimiento como máculas o placas eritematosas en la piel o mucosas. Sin tratamiento, las lesiones tienden a oscurecerse con la edad, tornándose rojizas o color púrpura, y pueden desarrollar engrosamiento nodular o un granuloma piógeno asociado. Los tratamientos con láser proporcionan mejoría mediante la destrucción selectiva de la vasculatura. Se han utilizado una variedad de láseres vasculares selectivos, pero el tratamiento de primera elección es el láser de colorante pulsado. Los mejores resultados se obtienen cuando el tratamiento es instaurado tempranamente. (AU)

Port wine stains are a type of vascular malformation that affects 0.3% to 0.5% of the population. They are present from birth as erythematous macules or plaques on the skin or mucous membranes. Without treatment, these lesions tend to darken with age, becoming reddish or purple and may develop nodular thickening or an associated pyogenic granuloma. Laser treatments might provide an improvement by selective destruction of the vasculature. A variety of selective vascular lásers may be employed, with the pulsed dye laser as the gold standard treatment. Better results are obtained when the treatment is established early. (AU)

A systematic review and meta-analysis: Do absorbable or non-absorbable suture materials differ in cosmetic outcomes in patients requiring primary closure of facial wounds?

INTRODUCTION: Surgeons are often judged based on the cosmetic appearance of any scar after surgery rather than the functional outcome of treatment, especially when considering facial wounds. OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine whether absorbable or non-absorbable suture materials result in different cosmetic outcomes for patients requiring primary closure of facial wounds. METHODS: An extensive systematic review was carried out to identify studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Risk of bias in each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Data were extracted from those articles that met our inclusion criteria, and statistical analysis was carried out using the Cochrane RevMan. RESULTS: We found no significant difference in any aspect of our analysis including Visual Analogue Cosmesis scale, Visual Analogue Satisfaction scale, infection, dehiscence, erythema or stitch marks. Most authors concluded that they prefer to use absorbable sutures. However, the overall quality of evidence is poor, and significant variation exists regarding the methods of assessment between papers. CONCLUSION: Use of absorbable suture material appears to be an acceptable alternative to non-absorbable suture material for the closure of facial wounds as they produce similar cosmetic results.

Assessment of quality-of-life in patients with face-and-neck burns: The Burn-Specific Health Scale for Face and Neck (BSHS-FN).

INTRODUCTION: Burns to the cephalic extremities are particularly implicated in problems of self-image and alterations to personal social relations. The aim of this study was to objectively assess the quality-of-life (QoL) of patients suffering from face-and-neck burns through our newly created scale: The Burn-Specific Health Scale for Face and Neck (BSHS-FN). METHODS: After constructing the BSHS-FN, we compared QoL of patients with or without face-and-neck burns. SF-36, the French version of the BSHS-B (Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief), and the BSHS-FN were administrated to 53 patients divided into two groups: GB group (general burns, 26 patients) and FN group (face-neck burns, 27 patients). RESULTS: QoL evaluated using the SF-36 had a higher average total score in GB patients compared to FN patients, but there were no significant difference between the two groups (54.3±18.5 vs. 47.0±17.3, respectively, p=0.11). In contrast, in BSHS-B the total score was significantly different between the two groups with a higher score recorded for the GB group (71.9±13.4 [median: 72.8] in the GB group vs. 62.2±14.4 [median: 64.4] in the FN group). In percentage terms, total score of BSHS-FN for GB group was 79.1±10.1, while total score for FN group was 53.6±13.1 (p<0.001), with the highest score for the Face and Neck domain in GB group (99.7±1.1, p<0.001) CONCLUSION: The BSHS-FN seemed to be more appropriate to assess QoL for FN burn patients. This study supports its application in routine clinical practice and in international studies.

Prevalence and predictive factors of psychological morbidity following facial injury: a prospective study of patients attending a maxillofacial outpatient clinic within a major UK city.

Adults presenting to maxillofacial surgery services are at high risk of psychological morbidity. This study examined the prevalence of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, drug and alcohol use, and appearance-related distress among maxillofacial trauma outpatients over medium-term follow-up. It also explored socio-demographic and injury-related variables associated with psychological distress to inform targeted psychological screening protocols for maxillofacial trauma services. Significant associations were found between level of distress at time of injury and number of traumatic life events with levels of depression at 3 months. No significant associations were found between predictor variables and PTSD at 3 months, or with any psychiatric diagnosis at 6 months. The lack of evidence for an identifiable subgroup of patients who were at higher risk of psychological distress indicated that routine screening of all maxillofacial trauma outpatients should be offered in order to best respond to their mental health needs. The feasibility of the medical team facilitating this is challenging and should ideally be undertaken by psychologists integrated within the MDT. This study led to the funding of a clinical psychologist to provide collaborative care with the maxillofacial surgeons, resulting in brief assessment and treatment to over 600 patients in the first year of the service.

Los adultos que consultan en los servicios de cirugía máxilo-facial tienen un alto riesgo de presentar morbilidad psicológica. Este estudio examinó la prevalencia de depresión, trastorno por estrés postraumático (TEPT), ansiedad, uso de alcohol y drogas, y distrés relacionado con la apariencia entre los pacientes con trauma máxilofacial en un seguimiento ambulatorio de mediano plazo. También se exploraron variables socio-demográficas y otras relacionadas con las lesiones que se asocian con distrés psicológico para contar con protocolos de evaluación psicológica orientados a los servicios de trauma máxilo-facial. Se encontraron asociaciones significativas entre el nivel de distrés al momento de la lesión y el número de acontecimientos traumáticos con los niveles de depresión a los tres meses. En cambio, no hubo asociaciones significativas entre las variables predictoras y el TEPT a los tres meses, o con algún diagnóstico psiquiátrico a los seis meses. La falta de evidencia de un subgrupo identificable de pacientes que estuvieron en alto riesgo de distrés psicológico indicaron que se debe ofrecer la evaluación de rutina a todos los pacientes ambulatorios con trauma máxilo-facial para responder mejor a sus necesidades de salud mental. Constituye un desafío configurar un equipo médico que permita esto y lo ideal es que se forme un equipo multidisciplinario en que estén integrados psicólogos. Este estudio permitió el financiamiento de un psicólogo clínico, quien aportó atención en colaboración con los cirujanos máxilo-faciales, lo que se tradujo en una evaluación breve y el tratamiento de más de 600 pacientes durante el primer año de funcionamiento del servicio.

Les adultes hospitalisés des services de chirurgie maxillo-faciale sont à risque élevé de morbidité psychologique. Cette étude analyse la prévalence de la dépression, du syndrome de stress post-traumatique (SSPT), de l'anxiété, de la consommation de drogues et d'alcool ainsi que de la détresse liée à l'apparence chez des patients ayant subi un traumatisme maxillo-facial, avec un suivi à moyen terme en ambulatoire. Les variables socio-démographiques et liées à la lésion ainsi que la détresse psychologique sont également examinées afin de renseigner des protocoles ciblés de dépistage psychologique pour les services de chirurgie maxillo-faciale. Le niveau de détresse au moment de la lésion et le nombre d'événements traumatiques de la vie sont significativement associés aux niveaux de dépression à 3 mois. Aucune association significative n'a été trouvée entre les variables prédictives et le SSPT à 3 mois ou un diagnostic psychiatrique quel qu'il soit à 6 mois. L'identification d'un sous-groupe de patients à risque élevé de détresse psychologique est difficile : le dépistage de routine de tous les patients suivis en ambulatoire après chirurgie maxillo-faciale devrait donc être proposé afin de mieux répondre à leurs besoins en santé mentale. Créer l'équipe médicale qui le permettrait est compliqué ; idéalement, cette tâche devrait être confiée à des psychologues au sein d'une équipe pluridisciplinaire. Grâce à l'étude, le poste d'un psychologue clinicien a été financé, qui travaille en collaboration avec les chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux. C'est ainsi que plus de 600 patients ont été évalués et traités au cours de la première année.

Are facial injuries really different? An observational cohort study comparing appearance concern and psychological distress in facial trauma and non-facial trauma patients.

Facial injuries are widely assumed to lead to stigma and significant psychosocial burden. Experimental studies of face perception support this idea, but there is very little empirical evidence to guide treatment. This study sought to address the gap. Data were collected from 193 patients admitted to hospital following facial or other trauma. Ninety (90) participants were successfully followed up 8 months later. Participants completed measures of appearance concern and psychological distress (post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms). Participants were classified by site of injury (facial or non-facial injury). The overall levels of appearance concern were comparable to those of the general population, and there was no evidence of more appearance concern among people with facial injuries. Women and younger people were significantly more likely to experience appearance concern at baseline. Baseline and 8-month psychological distress, although common in the sample, did not differ according to the site of injury. Changes in appearance concern were, however, strongly associated with psychological distress at follow-up. We conclude that although appearance concern is severe among some people with facial injury, it is not especially different to those with non-facial injuries or the general public; changes in appearance concern, however, appear to correlate with psychological distress. We therefore suggest that interventions might focus on those with heightened appearance concern and should target cognitive bias and psychological distress.

Nivel de satisfacción de los pacientes postoperados de traumatismo facial: un estudio de cohorte de un Hospital Nacional en Perú / Satisfaction level of post-operated facial trauma patients: a cohort study of a National Hospital in Peru

Resumen Objetivo Determinar el nivel de satisfacción de los pacientes postoperados de traumatismo facial en el Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo (HNDM). Material y Método Estudio cuantitativo, cohorte longitudinal, analítica. La población estuvo constituida por 36 pacientes con diagnóstico de traumatismo facial que se sometieron a cirugía en el servicio de cabeza y cuello del HNDM durante el periodo julio de 2014-febrero de 2015. Se utilizó un cuestionario sobre satisfacción global cuya confiabilidad es r = 0,95, que evalúa cinco dimensiones: Limitación funcional, apariencia facial, apariencia sexual y corporal, autoconcepto negativo y apariencia social. Los puntajes promedio obtenidos en la escala de Likert fueron comparados con la prueba T de student pareada. Se consideró un valor p < 0,05 como estadísticamente significativo. Resultados La satisfacción global de los pacientes postcirugía fue alta en comparación con lo alcanzado en la precirugía (p = 0,01). En las dimensiones limitación funcional, apariencia facial, autoconcepto negativo y apariencia social el 100% alcanzó un nivel de satisfacción alto en la postcirugía. En la dimensión de apariencia sexual y corporal, el 100% tuvo en el periodo postcirugía un nivel de satisfacción medio, respecto al nivel bajo obtenido en la precirugía. Conclusión Los pacientes postoperados de traumatismo facial en el Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo presentan un alto nivel de satisfacción a nivel funcional, de apariencia facial, en autoconcepto y de apariencia social.

Objective To determine the level of satisfaction of patients who underwent surgery for facial trauma in the Dos de Mayo National Hospital (HNDM). Materials and Methods Quantitative, cross-sectional analytical study. The population consisted of 36 patients diagnosed with facial trauma who underwent surgery in the Head and Neck service of the HNDM during the period July 2014-February 2015. A Global satisfaction questionnaire, previously validated for this research, was used whose reliability is r = 0.95 and evaluates aspects of Limitation functional, facial appearance, sexual and physical appearance, negative self- concept and social appearance. The average scores on the Likert scale were compared with the paired Student t test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Regarding the overall satisfaction of patients, the number of patients who reported having a high level of satisfaction was significantly higher in the post surgery compared to what was achieved in the pre surgery (p = 0.01). In respect of functional limitations, facial appearance, negative self-concept and social appearance 100% achieved a high level of satisfaction in the post surgery. In the dimension of sexual and physical appearance, 100% was in the post surgery a medium level of satisfaction, from the low level obtained in the pre surgery. Conclusions The patients operated after facial trauma in the Dos de Mayo National Hospital have a high level of satisfaction on a functional level, facial appearance, negative self-concept and social appearance.

Would brief alcohol intervention be helpful in facial trauma patients?A Narrative Review.

Facial trauma is commonly associated with excessive consumption of alcohol and is often associated with interpersonal violence or motor vehicle accidents. Alcohol-related trauma presentation to hospitals causes a major service burden, and there have been efforts to reduce such trauma load with educational programs and social support. Brief alcohol intervention (BAI) in an acute setting (emergency department or trauma centre) has been shown as an effective means to reduce future alcohol intake and the incidence of future alcohol-related injuries, especially in the period immediately following injuries. Less is known about the potential benefit of BAI when provided by the surgical team in the same clinical context. This article explores the individual component of brief alcohol intervention and its provision by an acute surgical service by way of a narrative review. The progress of research into brief alcohol intervention for facial trauma patients is also reviewed. The methods and rationale behind screening patients for targeted BAI are discussed in a separate article.

Usefulness of direct W-plasty application to wound debridement for minimizing scar formation in the ED.

PURPOSE: A suture line placed with the same direction as the relaxed skin tension line leads to good healing, but a suture line with over 30 degrees of angle from the relaxed skin tension line leads to longer healing time and more prominent scarring. W-plasty is widely used to change the direction of the scar or to divide it into several split scars. In this study, we applied W-plasty to patients with facial lacerations in the emergency department. METHODS: From June 2012 to December 2014, 35 patients underwent simple repair or W-plasty for facial lacerations. Patients in the simple repair group underwent resection following a thermal margin, and the W-plasty group was resected within a pre-designed margin of W-shaped laceration. We assessed prognosis using the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) after 10 days (short-term) and six months (long-term), respectively, following suture removal. RESULTS: Among 35 patients, 15 (42.9%) underwent simple debridement and 20 (57.1%) underwent W-plasty. In the W-plasty group, there was no difference between short-term and long-term follow-up showing high SBSES, but in the simple debridement group, long-term follow-up SBSES significantly decreased. W-plasty SBSES was higher than simple debridement at short-term as well as long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: We experienced good results of direct W-plasty application at six-month long-term follow-up. Therefore, W-plasty application is more effective in reducing scar appearance than a simple debridement method for facial laceration patients with an angle of 30 degrees or more to the relaxed skin tension line.

The surgical management of facial trauma in British soldiers during combat operations in Afghanistan.

INTRODUCTION: The recent Afghanistan conflict caused a higher proportion of casualties with facial injuries due to both the increasing effectiveness of combat body armour and the insurgent use of the improvised explosive device (IED). The aim of this study was to describe all injuries to the face sustained by UK service personnel from blast or gunshot wounds during the highest intensity period of combat operations in Afghanistan. METHODS: Hospital records and Joint Theatre Trauma Registry data were collected for all UK service personnel killed or wounded by blast and gunshot wounds in Afghanistan between 01 April 2006 and 01 March 2013. RESULTS: 566 casualties were identified, 504 from blast and 52 from gunshot injuries. 75% of blast injury casualties survived and the IED was the most common mechanism of injury with the mid-face the most commonly affected facial region. In blast injuries a facial fracture was a significant marker for increased total injury severity score. A facial gunshot wound was fatal in 53% of cases. The majority of survivors required a single surgical procedure for the facial injury but further reconstruction was required in 156 of the 375 of survivors aero medically evacuated to the UK. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and pattern of facial fractures was significantly different in survivors and fatalities, which may reflect the power of the blast that these cohorts were exposed to. The Anatomical Injury Scoring of the Injury Severity Scale was inadequate for determining the extent of soft tissue facial injuries and did not predict morbidity of the injury.

The role of face transplantation in the self-inflicted gunshot wound.

BACKGROUND: Facial self-inflicted gunshot wounds (SIGSWs) cause a devastating midfacial defect and pose a challenging problem to the reconstructive surgeon. Face transplantation (FT) has the potential for near-normal restoration in otherwise non-reconstructible defects. Two out of 7 FT recipients at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) sustained SIGSWs. In this study, we illustrate the role of FT in the management of SIGSWs through an aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial examination of outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of individuals with SIGSWs who were screened at BWH between 2008 and 2015. We then collected data of the injuries, modes of conventional reconstruction (CR), and deficits. For the FT recipients, we critically reviewed the psychosocial screening process and post-transplantation aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: A total of six individuals post-SIGSWs were screened for FT. All of them had undergone CR, with five receiving loco-regional flaps and free tissue transfers, and one undergoing serial debridement and primary soft-tissue repair. Following CR, all suffered from residual functional and aesthetic deficits. Two underwent partial FT and one is currently undergoing FT screening. We describe the pre-transplant psychosocial screening process and the aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes of the SIGSW FT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: We examined the facial SIGSW injury, outcomes of CR, and the mechanism of FT to offer a potential solution to the shortcomings of CR. More importantly, we highlight the critical nature of the psychosocial component of the multidisciplinary evaluation given the history of mental illness and suicidal behavior in this subset of patients.

Depression and anxiety disorders in a sample of facial trauma: A study from Iran.

BACKGROUND: Various studies have shown that such patients are susceptible to psychological problems and poor quality of life. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the prevalence of depression and anxiety disorders and quality of life in a group of facial trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present cross-sectional study Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Oral Health Impact (OHIP-14) questionnaires were used. In this study, fifty subjects were selected from the patients with maxillofacial traumas based on the judgment of the physicians, referring to hospitals in Kerman and Rafsanjan during 2012-2013. In addition, 50 patients referring to the Dental School for tooth extraction, with no maxillofacial traumas, were included. SPSS 13.5 was used for statistical analysis with two-sample t-test, Mantel-Haenszel technique, Pearson's correlation coefficient and chi-squared test. RESULTS: Seven patients with maxillofacial traumas were depressed based on HADS depression scale, with 5 other borderline cases. However, patients referring for surgery or tooth extraction only 2 were depressed and 1 patient was a borderline case. The results showed that patients with maxillofacial traumas had higher rates of depression and anxiety, with significant differences between this group and the other group (P=0.01). The results of the present study showed a significant prelateship between depression severity and confounding factors. The mean of OHIP-14 parameters were 35.51 ±5.2 and 22.3±2.4 in facial trauma and dental surgery groups, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study showed depression and anxiety disorders in patients with maxillofacial trauma. The results showed a higher rate of anxiety and anxiety in patients with maxillofacial traumas compared to the control group.