[How and why to monitor apprehension after anterior cruciate ligament surgery]. / Évaluation de l'appréhension avant la reprise de sport suite à la chirurgie du ligament croisé antérieur - Comment la monitorer et pourquoi ?

Numerous studies highlight the psychological aspect being the most frequent factors limiting the resumption of sport, following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, even before strength, the capacity of performing high impact pivoting movements, endurance, or joint stability. Scores that quantify apprehension, have been developed as clinical tool to monitor psychological readiness and in some cases to delay the moment for return to sport. Unfortunately, there are no established cut-off values for these scores to predict when and if return to sport at the same level as pre-traumatically can be resumed. The psychological aspect of return to sport remains individual, and influenced by age, type, and level of physical activity.

De nombreuses études mettent en avant l'aspect psychologique comme étant l'un des principaux facteurs limitant la reprise de sport après reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur, même avant le manque de force, les sauts et mouvements en pivot à haute intensité, l'endurance ou la stabilité mécanique du genou. Des scores, permettant de quantifier le degré d'appréhension, ont été élaborés afin de suivre la confiance ressentie du patient lors de mouvements liés au sport et de retarder la reprise sportive si nécessaire. Malheureusement, pour l'instant, aucun consensus n'est établi dans la littérature autour d'une valeur seuil de ces différents scores pour la reprise de sport. L'interprétation de ces scores reste pour l'instant une évaluation individualisée, influencée par l'âge, le type et le niveau du sport pratiqué par le patient.

Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee: Patient Health Literacy, Expectations for Management, and Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to review the orthopedic literature regarding patient understanding of articular cartilage disease, interpret literature reporting patient expectations for surgical management of articular cartilage injuries of the knee, and review patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction with management of these injuries. DESIGN: A retrospective review of the current literature using the PubMed database (1980-current) was performed on July 15, 2017. The search terms used were "patient understanding knee cartilage," "patient satisfaction knee cartilage," "patient expectation knee cartilage," and "patient reported outcomes knee cartilage." All searches were filtered to human studies and English language only and were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Studies not relevant to articular cartilage injury and/or surgical management in the knee were excluded. Additional references were found by backtracing references from obtained articles. RESULTS: The published study search results for the terms: "patient understanding knee cartilage," "patient satisfaction knee cartilage," "patient expectation knee cartilage," and "patient reported outcomes knee cartilage" displayed a total of 873 studies. Two independent reviewers screen all studies A total of 50 published studies were relevant and included. CONCLUSION: The subjective and objective clinical outcomes reported are inconsistently obtained resulting in difficulty drawing comparisons between studies. While the relationship between preoperative patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction has yet to be well developed, authors have reported patient and injury specific variables associated with superior and inferior outcomes. In conclusion, more work is needed to correlate patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction for cartilage treatments with preoperative expectations and health literacy.

The English Knee Self-Efficacy Scale is a valid and reliable measure for knee-specific self-efficacy in individuals with a sport-related knee injury in the past 5 years.

PURPOSE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Swedish Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES) into English and evaluate the measurement properties in a sample of individuals with previous knee injury. METHODS: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and evaluation followed the Beaton multi-step process and COSMIN guidelines. Participants (n = 125) aged 16-60 years with a sport-related intra-articular tibiofemoral or patellofemoral injury within the last 5 years completed the K-SES, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Scale, Tegner Activity Level Scale, and Multi-dimensional Health Locus of Control. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested a-priori two-factor structure and model fit. Cronbach-alpha, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability (Bland-Altman plots) were calculated. Construct validity was assessed by eight pre-defined hypotheses. A sub-group of participants (n = 42) completed the K-SES twice to assess intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: The cross-cultural adaptation generated an English K-SES with face and content validity. The original two-factor structure was rejected based on CFA and a revised solution informed by Exploratory Factor analysis resulted in an adequate fit. All construct validity hypotheses were confirmed. The K-SES showed good internal consistency [Factor (F1: α = 0.96; F2: α = 0.73)], intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.92), and no systematic bias between repeated measurements. CONCLUSION: The English K-SES is a valid and reliable measure for knee-specific self-efficacy in individuals who have sustained a sport-related intra-articular knee injury in the previous 5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Individual Coping Strategies Are Associated with Patient-Reported Satisfaction upon Completion of Rehabilitation following Sports-Related Knee Surgery.

We sought to determine whether individual coping strategies and optimism are associated with satisfaction after sports-related knee surgery at the time of rehabilitation completion and whether the association between coping strategies/optimism and satisfaction varies by surgical procedure or length of rehabilitation. A total of 104 recreational and competitive athletes who underwent knee surgery completed preoperative assessments for intrinsic optimism using the revised Life Orientation Test and coping strategies using the brief Coping Orientations to the Problem Experience inventory. Postoperative assessments at completion of rehabilitation (mean: 5.5-month follow-up.; maximum: 15 months) included satisfaction with surgery, return to prior level of sport, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC-S) symptom scores. Eighty-one percent were satisfied after completion of rehabilitation with a 68% return to prior level of sport. Irrespective of surgical procedure or length of rehabilitation (p > 0.25, all comparisons), greater reliance on others for emotional support as a coping mechanism increased risk of dissatisfaction after surgery (per point: odds ratio [OR]: 1.75; confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-2.92; p = 0.01), whereas greater use of positive reframing as a coping mechanism was protective (per point: OR: 0.43; CI: 0.21-0.82; p = 0.009). Intrinsic optimism was not predictive of postoperative satisfaction (p = 0.71). Satisfied patients had mean 13.5 points higher IKDC-S scores at follow-up than unsatisfied patients (p = 0.001). Patients who returned to prior level of sport had significantly higher satisfaction scores than patients who had not. Irrespective of surgical procedure or length of rehabilitation, use of positive reframing and reliance on others for emotional support are positive and negative predictors, respectively, of satisfaction after sports-related knee surgery. Preoperative optimism is not predictive of postoperative satisfaction.

Pain perception and coping strategies influence early outcomes following knee surgery in athletes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether pain perceptions and coping strategies are predictive of the following outcomes after knee surgery in athletes: (1) return to similar level of sport, (2) improvement in symptoms, and (3) improvement in kinesiophobia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: 101 athletes (52 men, 49 women; mean age 32.7years) at mean 12.1months follow-up were included. Independent relationships between patient outcomes and pre-operative measures were determined: short form McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Coping Measure (PCM), and the brief COPE subscales of acceptance, denial, positive reframing, and use of instrumental support. Adjustment was performed for length of follow-up, symptom duration, surgical history, age, activity level, and surgical procedure. RESULTS: Rate of return to similar level of sport was 73%; severe pain catastrophizers (PCS >36 points) had increased odds of not returning to similar level of sport (OR 11.3 CI 1.51, 236; p=0.02) whereas COPE-use of instrumental support was protective (per point increase: 0.72 CI 0.54, 0.94; p=0.02). Problem-focused coping positively correlated with improvement in IKDC-S scores (beta 0.032 SE 0.010; p=0.001). Improvement in kinesiophobia after surgery was less likely with higher pre-operative perceived pain frequency (OR 0.23 CI 0.06, 0.71; p=0.009) and higher COPE-denial scores (OR 0.43 CI 0.21, 0.88; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Among athletes undergoing knee surgery, severe pain catastrophizing is negatively associated with return to similar level of sport. Instrumental support and problem-focused coping strategies are associated with improved outcomes. High preoperative pain scores are negatively associated with improvement in kinesiophobia after rehabilitation.

Mental Health and Tobacco Use Are Correlated With Physical Function Outcomes in Patients With Knee Pain and Injury.

PURPOSE: To examine the relation between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Depression (PROMIS-D), and Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) for nonoperative patients presenting to our ambulatory sports orthopaedic clinic with knee complaints and to determine whether patient demographic characteristics influence PROMIS scores, particularly tobacco use. METHODS: All patients treated nonoperatively for a primary complaint of knee pain were recruited for participation. Patients were included if they completed all 3 PROMIS questionnaires prior to their clinical evaluation. Patients were excluded if their treatment plan determined that surgical intervention was warranted. Survey results were compiled, and statistical correlations were run between PROMIS domains and patient demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 527 PROMIS questionnaire sets were included. PROMIS-PF had a strong negative correlation with PROMIS-PI (R = -0.75, P < .001) and a nearly moderate negative correlation with PROMIS-D (R = -0.47, P < .001). When evaluating patient demographic characteristics, we found a significant decrease in physical function scores and increases in pain and depression scores in both current and former tobacco users compared with nonsmokers. Differences in all PROMIS domains between smokers and nonsmokers exceeded minimal clinically important differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed an inverse correlation between PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PF, as well as between PROMIS-D and PROMIS-PI, in patients seen in the ambulatory setting for knee complaints treated nonoperatively. A positive correlation was found between PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-D. Tobacco use was a patient demographic factor found to significantly impact PROMIS scores leading to minimal clinically important differences across all 3 PROMIS domains. The findings of this study may be used to identify patients at high risk of poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, observational study.

Validation of the French version of the KOOS-child questionnaire.

PURPOSE: The Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire is one of the frequently used outcome scores in pediatric studies. However, a recent study demonstrated that the pediatric population had a limited understanding of some of its questions. Therefore, the KOOS-Child questionnaire was developed specifically for this population. Our team produced a French adaptation based on the English version. The objective of the current study was to validate the French adaptation of the KOOS-Child questionnaire. METHODS: After ethic board approval, the questionnaire was translated from English to French by two French speaking orthopedic surgeons. Following consensus, the translated version was retranslated to English by a professional translator. A group of experts compared the original and back translated version and decided on a final adapted questionnaire version. Ninety-nine 8-16 year-old patients were prospectively recruited from our pediatric orthopedic surgery clinic. Twenty-one control participants and 78 patients suffering from knee pain were recruited. The participants were asked to answer the translated French version of the KOOS-Child questionnaire and two validated French pediatric quality of life surveys. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated no statistically significant demographic difference between the control population and the patients suffering from a knee pathology. The mean for the five different domains of the KOOS-Child questionnaire showed statistical differences (p < 0.001) between the two groups. Construct validity was demonstrated through testing of previously validated hypothesis of correlation. Internal consistency was also confirmed in injured patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the current study results demonstrate good to excellent internal consistency, good construct validity and inconclusive discriminant capacity of the French adaptation of the KOOS-Child questionnaire. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Patient Experiences of Recovery After Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Qualitative Study.

CONTEXT: The recovery process after autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) can be challenging for patients and clinicians alike due to significant functional limitations and a lengthy healing time. Understanding patients' experiences during the recovery process may assist clinicians in providing more individualized care. OBJECTIVE: To explore and describe patients' experiences during the recovery process after ACI. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Orthopaedic clinic. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Participants from a single orthopaedic practice who had undergone ACI within the previous 12 months were purposefully selected. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Volunteers participated in 1-on-1 semistructured interviews to describe their recovery experiences after ACI. Data were analyzed using the process of horizontalization. RESULTS: Seven patients (2 men, 5 women; age = 40.7 ± 7.5 years, time from surgery = 8.7 ± 4.2 months) participated. Four themes and 6 subthemes emerged from the data and suggested that the recovery process is a lengthy and emotional experience. Therapy provides optimism for the future but requires a collaborative effort among the patient, surgeon, rehabilitation provider, and patient's caregiver(s). Furthermore, patients expressed frustration that their expectations for recovery did not match the reality of the process, including greater dependence on caregivers than expected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' expectations should be elicited before surgery and managed throughout the recovery process. Providing preoperative patient and caregiver education and encouraging preoperative rehabilitation can assist in managing expectations. Establishing realistic goals and expectations may improve rehabilitation adherence, encourage optimism for recovery, and improve outcomes in the long term.

Over-optimistic patient expectations of recovery and leisure activities after arthroscopic meniscus surgery.

Background and purpose - Patients' expectations of outcomes following arthroscopic meniscus surgery are largely unknown. We investigated patients' expectations concerning recovery and participation in leisure-time activities after arthroscopic meniscus surgery and the postoperative fulfillment of these. Patients and methods - The study sample consisted of 491 consecutively recruited patients (mean age 50 (SD 13) years, 55% men) who were assigned for arthroscopy on suspicion of meniscus injury and later verified by arthroscopy. Before surgery, patients completed questionnaires regarding their expectations of recovery time and postoperative participation in leisure activities. 3 months after surgery, the patients completed questionnaires on their actual level of leisure activity and their degree of satisfaction with their current knee function. We analyzed differences between the expected outcome and the actual outcome, and between fulfilled/exceeded expectations and satisfaction with knee function. Results - 478 patients (97%) completed the follow-up. 91% had expected to be fully recovered within 3 months. We found differences between patients' preoperative expectations of participation in leisure activities postoperatively and their actual participation in these, with 59% having unfulfilled expectations (p < 0.001). Satisfaction with current knee function was associated with expectations of leisure activities being fulfilled/exceeded. Interpretation - In general, patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscus surgery were too optimistic regarding their recovery time and postoperative participation in leisure activities. This highlights the need for shared decision making which should include giving the patient information on realistic expectations of recovery time and regarding participation in leisure-time activities after meniscal surgery.

Expectativas y aprensiones de los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado anterior de rodilla / Expectations and concerns of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery

INTRODUCCIÓN: La lesión del ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) es una afección frecuente cuyo manejo quirúrgico genera incertidumbre en el paciente sobre su retorno a la actividad. Las expectativas previas al procedimiento influyen en su percepción del éxito del tratamiento, la aparición de complicaciones y en el resultado final, comprometiendo la satisfacción en el postoperatorio. OBJETIVO: Determinar las preocupaciones y expectativas de los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de reconstrucción de LCA. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo observacional realizado a través de encuestas a pacientes con lesión del LCA que serían sometidos a una cirugía de reconstrucción. Las variables evaluadas fueron edad, mecanismo de lesión, práctica de actividad deportiva, información previa acerca de la intervención quirúrgica y las preocupaciones y expectativas sobre el procedimiento. RESULTADOS: Cincuenta pacientes fueron encuestados, 38 hombres y 12 mujeres, con edad promedio de 30 años. Los mecanismos de lesión más frecuentes correspondieron a accidentes deportivos de fútbol y esquí. El 96% de los encuestados practicaba algún deporte de forma regular (promedio 5h semanales) previo a la intervención quirúrgica. El 90% de los pacientes investigaron sobre la cirugía de reconstrucción de LCA. Las principales preocupaciones preoperatorias correspondieron al tiempo de recuperación (40%) y a la posibilidad de reintegrarse en la práctica deportiva (38%). Las expectativas se concentraron en lograr un reintegro deportivo precoz (54%) y la presencia de dolor postoperatorio (40%). CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes sometidos a reconstrucción de LCA presentan preocupaciones principalmente respecto al tiempo de recuperación postoperatorio y sus expectativas se centran en el logro de un reintegro deportivo precoz.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common condition and its surgical treatment causes uncertainty in patients about their return to activity. The expectations prior to the procedure influence their perception of treatment success, development of complications, and final results, and can have an impact on post-surgical patient satisfaction. OBJETIVE: To determine the concerns and expectations of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery. METHOD: Prospective observational study, in which questionnaires were completed by patients with ACL injury that would undergo reconstructive surgery. The evaluated variables were age, mechanism of injury, sports practice, prior information about the surgery and concerns and expectations about the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients completed the questionnaire, of whom 38 were men and 12 women with a mean age of 30 years. The most common injury mechanisms were when practicing football and skiing. Almost all (96%) of respondents played sports regularly (average 5hours a week) before the surgery. A total of 90% of patients had enquired about ACL reconstruction surgery. The main pre-operative concerns were recovery time (40%) and the possibility of reinstatement of sports (38%). Expectations are focused on achieving an early sports recovery (54%) and the presence of postoperative pain (40%). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction have concerns primarily as regards post-surgical recovery time and expectations are focused on achieving an early reinstatement of sports.

[Midterm Results for Quality of Life After Surgical Treatment of Moore Type V Fractures of the Tibial Plateau]. / Mittelfristige Ergebnisse zur Lebensqualität nach operativer Versorgung von Tibiakopffrakturen vom Typ Moore V.

Background: Dislocation fractures of the tibial plateau often lead to functional restrictions and subjective complaints from the patients. Besides functional and radiological results, criteria to determine the quality of life are of increasing importance. Intermediate term restriction in quality of life was evaluated and correlated with objective radiological results in patients with Moore type V dislocation fracture of the tibial plateau. Patients and Methods: From 2003 to 2012, a multicentre retrospective cohort study in three hospitals was used to register 36 patients with 38 Moore type V dislocation fractures of the tibial plateau. The injury mechanism, the surgical treatment (one step or two step surgery, single or double plate fixation) the complication rate, the radiological result (Kellgren/Lawrence osteoarthritis score, loss of reduction, secondary deviation of the axis) after a mean follow-up of 37 months, and the quality of life (pain and function by NRS, IKDC form, EQ 5D score) after a mean follow-up of 68 months (range, 15-128 months), were analysed. Results: The mean age of the 27 men and the 9 women was 50.8 years. There were 30 cases of high impact injury. An external fixator was used for primary fracture stabilisation in 24 knees; definitive internal fixation was performed in a second step. Internal fixation using a single plate was used in 12 knees, and double plate fixation in 25 knees; one patient was treated definitively with an external fixator. Early complications (3â€Š× infection, 2â€Š× compartment syndrome, 4â€Š× implant failure) were seen in 21.1 % of patients; all could be cured surgically. The function of the affected knee joint gave a mean NRS of 4.53; the IKDC score was 50.46, and the EQ 5D 7.47. Only two patients (5 %) were free of pain, 27 (75 %) reported mild to moderate pain, and 7 patients (20 %) reported severe pain. Four patients are retired or have applied for a pension. Altogether, the quality of life was calculated as being 44 % of the initial value before the injury. Four patients required an endoprosthetic replacement at an early stage, after an average of 6 months. Signs of osteoarthritis (Kellgren/Lawrence > I) were seen in 32 of the remaining 33 fractures; 19 of these exhibited distinct signs of osteoarthritis (Kellgren/Lawrence III, IV). Loss of reduction (≥ 2 mm) was seen in 13 (34.2 %) and deviation of axis (> 10°) in 3 patients (7.8 %). There was no relation to the surgical strategy. However, there was a correlation between the subjective assessments of the quality of life and the radiological results. Conclusion: Moore type V dislocation fractures of the tibial plateau are severe knee injuries resulting in a distinct reduction in quality of life in the intermediate term. There is a correlation between the subjective assessments and the objective radiological results. Therefore, the congruency of the articular surface and the axis have to be reconstructed as precisely as possible when repairing fractures of the tibial plateau.

Patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Unrealistic patient expectations have been shown to negatively influence patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Knowledge about patient expectations is important to associate preoperative expectations with the reasonable outcome of a specific procedure. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyse and to compare patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to assess the factors associated with patient expectations. METHODS: Preoperative expectations of 181 consecutive patients undergoing ACLR were assessed prospectively using a 5-item questionnaire. Primary ACLR (P-ACLR) was performed in 133 patients (73%), whereas 48 patients (27%) underwent revision ACLR (R-ACLR). The questionnaire assessed the expectation of the overall condition of the knee joint, return to sports, instability, pain, and risk of osteoarthritis. RESULTS: All patients expected a normal (38%) or nearly normal (62%) condition of the knee joint. Return to sports at the same level was expected by 91%. With regard to instability (pain), no instability (pain) independent of the activity level was expected by 77% (58%). No or only a slightly increased risk of the development of osteoarthritis was expected by 98%. The R-ACLR group showed a significantly lower expectation of the overall condition (p = 0.001), return to sports (p < 0.001), and pain (p = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was found between female and male patients (n.s.). In the P-ACLR group, patients with a history of previous knee surgery showed inferior expectations of return to sports (p = 0.015) and risk of osteoarthritis (p = 0.011). Age, number of previous knee surgeries, and pre-injury sports level significantly influenced patient expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient expectations of ACL reconstruction are high. Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction have lower but still demanding expectations. Younger patients, patients without a history of knee surgery, and highly active patients have higher expectations. Explicit patient information about realistic goals of ACL reconstruction seems to be necessary in order to prevent postoperative dissatisfaction despite a successful operation in the surgeons' point of view. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level IV.

Kinesiophobia and Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is typically recommended for patients who wish to return to aggressive athletic activity. Unfortunately, reconstructive knee surgery is not a guarantee that all patients will return to their preinjury level of function. A recent meta-analysis including 48 studies showed that after a mean follow-up of 41 months, 82% of participants had returned to some kind of athletic activity but only 63% returned to their preinjury level of participation and a disappointing 44% returned to competitive sports. The reasons why some athletes have been unsuccessful in returning to previous levels of activity are vast and our understanding of these factors is limited. The importance of psychological factors has recently been emphasized. One such factor, kinesiophobia, or fear of reinjury, may play a significant role in some patients' inability to successfully return to their previous level of sports participation. In the meta-analysis, kinesiophobia was the most common reason cited for postoperative reduction in, or cessation of, sports participation.

Differences in Attentional Focus Associated With Recovery From Sports Injury: Does Injury Induce an Internal Focus?

Although it is commonly believed that focusing too much attention on the injured body area impairs recovery in sports, this has not been directly assessed. The present study investigated attentional focus following sports injury. Experienced baseball position players recovering from knee surgery (Expt 1) and baseball pitchers recovering from elbow surgery (Expt 2) performed simulated batting and pitching respectively. They also performed three different secondary tasks: leg angle judgments, arm angle judgments, and judgments about the ball leaving their bat/hand. Injured athletes were compared with expert and novice control groups. Performance on the secondary tasks indicated that the injured batters had an internal focus of attention localized on the area of the injury resulting in significantly poorer batting performance as compared with the expert controls. Injured pitchers had a diffuse, internal attentional focus similar to that of novices resulting in poorer pitching performance as compared with the expert controls.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to translate, adapt and validate in French the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), a 12-item English language scale assessing the psychological impact of returning to sports after ACL reconstruction. METHODS: The ACL-RSI scale was forward and back translated, cross-culturally adapted and validated using international guidelines. The study population included all patients who were active in sports and underwent primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The control group included subjects with no history of knee trauma. At the 6-month follow-up, the study population completed the ACL-RSI scale twice within 3-4 days, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. Statistical tests assessed the construct validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, reliability and feasibility of the ACL-RSI scale. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with ACL tears and 98 control subjects were included: mean age 31.7 ± 8.1 and 21.8 ± 2, respectively. The ACL-RSI scores were correlated with all KOOS sub-categories (r = 0.22-0.64, p < 0.05) as well as the subjective IKDC score (r = 0.42, p < 0.00001). The mean scores of the study and control groups were significantly different (62.8 ± 19.4 vs. 89.6 ± 11.5, p < 0.00001), and scores were significantly better in patients who returned to the same sport (72.1 ± 21.4 vs. 60.3 ± 18.1, p = 0.008). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.96). Test-retest reproducibility was excellent: ρ = 0.90 (0.86-0.94), p < 0.00001. Administration time was 1.32 ± 0.7 mn, and all items were answered. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the ACL-RSI was successful and validated in a French-speaking population. The discriminant capacity of the scale between patients who underwent reconstruction and healthy subjects was confirmed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Psychological predictors of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Lack of return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often occurs despite adequate restoration of knee function, and there is growing evidence that psychological difference among patients may play an important role in this discrepancy. The purpose of this review is to identify baseline psychological factors that are predictive of clinically relevant ACL reconstruction outcomes, including return to sport, rehab compliance, knee pain, and knee function. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, UptoDate, Cochrane Reviews, and SportDiscus, which identified 1,633 studies for potential inclusion. Inclusion criteria included (1) prospective design, (2) participants underwent ACL reconstruction, (3) psychological traits assessed at baseline, and (4) outcome measures such as return to sport, rehabilitation compliance, and knee symptoms assessed. Methodological quality was evaluated with a modified Coleman score with several item-specific revisions to improve relevance to injury risk assessment studies in sports medicine. RESULTS: Eight prospective studies were included (modified Coleman score 63 ± 4.9/90, range 55-72). Average study size was 83 ± 42 patients with median 9-month follow-up (range 3-60 months). Measures of self-efficacy, self-motivation, and optimism were predictive of rehabilitation compliance, return to sport, and self-rated knee symptoms. Pre-operative stress was negatively predictive, and measures of social support were positively predictive of knee symptoms and rehabilitation compliance. Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing at the first rehabilitation appointment did not predict knee symptoms throughout the early rehabilitation phase (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Patient psychological factors are predictive of ACL reconstruction outcomes. Self-confidence, optimism, and self-motivation are predictive of outcomes, which is consistent with the theory of self-efficacy. Stress, social support, and athletic self-identity are predictive of outcomes, which is consistent with the global relationship between stress, health, and the buffering hypothesis of social support.

QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER BILATERAL ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTIONS.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of study was to analyze the influence of bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions on life quality of patients and their return to sports activities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two operated patients took part in this survey during the period of ten years. There were 5 women and 27 men, their average age being 30.46 years (19-55). The participants answered a modified Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire set and gave data about preoperative and postoperative periods. RESULTS: The participants' age and parameters of Lysholm scale did not correlate significantly with the subjective level of physical activity after the second knee surgery. After the first anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 4 participants (12.5%) did not return to trainings, while 28 did (87.5%); 8 patients (25%) did not return to competitions and 24 of them (75%) achieved the competition level of sports activities. After the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of contralatera knee, 6 (18.8%) did not return to trainings, while 26 (81.3%) did; 15 patients (46.9%) did not return to competitions, while 17 (53.1% continued to compete without restrictions. The average values of questionnaire scores were between 95.1-98.2 points. Discussion and CONCLUSION: Resuming the same or higher level of sports activitie., after the first reconstruction is one of the preconditions for the same injury of another knee. An athlete looses more than two and a half years of competitions on average. Operations of additional meniscu ruptures do not play a crucial role in restitution of sports activities Although we achieved good operative results, only every seconc athlete with bilateral injury has returned to sports activities withou restrictions after the bilateral anterior cruciate reconstructions.

Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: noncopers versus potential copers.

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary-analysis, longitudinal cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To compare kinesiophobia levels in noncopers and potential copers at time points spanning pre- and post-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to examine the association between changes in kinesiophobia levels and clinical measures. BACKGROUND: After ACL injury, a screening examination may be used to classify patients as potential copers or noncopers based on dynamic knee stability. Quadriceps strength, single-leg hop performance, and self-reported knee function are worse in noncopers. High kinesiophobia levels after ACL reconstruction are associated with poorer self-reported knee function and lower return-to-sport rates. Kinesiophobia levels have not been examined before ACL reconstruction, across the transition from presurgery to postsurgery, or based on potential coper and noncoper classification. METHODS: Quadriceps strength indexes, single-leg hop score indexes, self-reported knee function (Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living subscale, global rating scale), and kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia [TSK-11]) scores were compiled for potential copers (n = 50) and noncopers (n = 61) from 2 clinical trial databases. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare TSK-11 scores between groups and across 4 time points (before preoperative treatment, after preoperative treatment, 6 months post-ACL reconstruction, and 12 months post-ACL reconstruction). Correlations determined the association of kinesiophobia levels with other clinical measures. RESULTS: Presurgery TSK-11 scores were significantly higher in noncopers than in potential copers. Postsurgery, no group differences existed. TSK-11 scores in both groups decreased across all time points; however, TSK-11 scores decreased more in noncopers in the interval between presurgery and postsurgery. In noncopers, the decreases in TSK-11 scores from presurgery to postsurgery and after surgery were related to improvements in the Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living subscale, whereas the association was only present in potential copers after surgery. CONCLUSION: Kinesiophobia levels were high in both noncopers and potential copers preoperatively. Restoration of mechanical knee stability with surgery might have contributed to decreased kinesiophobia levels in noncopers. Kinesiophobia is related to knee function after surgery, regardless of preoperative classification as a potential coper or noncoper.

[Effect of continuous passive motion for cartilage regenerative surgery - a systematic literature review]. / Wirkung von passiven Motorbewegungsschienen nach knorpelregenerativen Eingriffen - eine systematische Literaturübersicht.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate treatment effects of continuous passive motion (CPM) after surgical cartilage repair. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MEDLINE, Trip Database and in bibliographies of included studies. Two independent researchers evaluated the quality of original investigations by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Systematic reviews were checked by the CBO/Dutch Cochrane Centre Guideline. RESULTS: A total of 1541 studies was initially retrieved from the databases. After screening for inclusion criteria, one review and ten original papers could be included for further evaluation. Studies showed methodological weaknesses. Heterogeneity of outcome measures and the fact that 6 of 9 studies with an one-group pre-post design measured the combined effect of surgical treatment and CPM prevented a meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Three studies described significant improvements with regard to subjective outcome such as pain, swelling, Quality Life Survey, Knee Society score, WOMAC score or rating Cincinnati due to the surgical treatment and the CPM intervention of cartilage defects in the knee. Six (case) studies suggested an enhanced cartilage quality of the patients after CPM. More high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to provide high level evidence.

Fear of reinjury (kinesiophobia) and persistent knee symptoms are common factors for lack of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine patient-cited reasons for lack of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by 2 surgeons from 2007 to 2008 (N = 171) were contacted for a telephone interview. Patients who did not return to preinjury levels by self-assessment were then asked to cite contributing factors from a predetermined list. These included non-knee-related life events, persistent knee symptoms, fear of reinjury (kinesiophobia), and choice-related options (such as lack of interest or time). RESULTS: Of the 135 patients who completed the interview, 62 (46%) reported a return to preinjury activity levels (returners) whereas 73 (54%) did not (non-returners). Returners (26.4 ± 10.9 years) were younger than non-returners (30.0 ± 9.8 years) (P = .04). Persistent knee symptoms (68%) and kinesiophobia (52%) were more commonly cited as reasons for not returning to sport than non-knee-related life events (29%), including children, job/education, or health problems (P < .001 for symptoms and P = .004 for kinesiophobia). Among non-returners who cited knee symptoms, 50% concurrently cited kinesiophobia and 24% cited life events. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of return to preinjury activity levels is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A majority of patients who do not return to their preinjury activities cite persistent knee symptoms, particularly pain, as a contributing factor, and only a minority of patients cite job and family demands or a lack of interest. Finally, fear of reinjury was cited by half of the patients who did not return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.